Alvin Bragg Needs A Friend

Apparently there’s a difference between tweeting how bad the president is, and trying to shoehorn a legal fantasy into reality, making a joke out of the whole anti-Trump aesthetic.

posted by Eddie Scarry at The Federalist

You don’t have to immerse yourself in the dry legal details of the criminal charges against Donald Trump to determine whether the case is strong. Just measure the miles that Washington and New York elites are placing between them and the unfortunately named Alvin Bragg.

Bragg exhibits all of the qualities that would typically have major newspaper and glossy magazine editors tripping over themselves to have their publications associated with him, eager to photograph Bragg dramatically lit, defiantly staring at the camera. He’s a Democrat. He makes a big show about opposing Trump. He’s a minority. He’s even fat.

And yet there’s been nothing. No gauzy cable news profiles. No photoshoots. No late-night TV tributes to his bravery.

Bragg will forever go down in history as the first man to criminally prosecute a former U.S. president. And not just any former president— Donald Trump!

And nothing?! Stacey Abrams got more respect for losing two elections (three, if you count her sad campaign to get picked as Joe Biden’s running mate).

It’s not as though Bragg isn’t doing something monumental. He has the right idea: Confront Trump in the most theatrical setting possible (preferably as a black or Latinx person, or at least a woman, to raise the “oppressed but brave minority” dynamic) and then field the slew of high-profile media opportunities that inevitably follow.

It worked for Khizr Khan. It worked for “The Squad.” It worked for Liz Cheney, of all people.

It even worked for Michael Avenatti — a white man!

But apparently there’s a difference between tweeting how bad the president is and trying to shoehorn a legal fantasy into reality, making a joke out of the whole anti-Trump aesthetic.

As historical as his contribution to The Resistance may be, Bragg has taken it too far, even for the corrupt national media. He’s like the guy telling dirty jokes at a party, but in his state of over-confidence, he says something like, “Then I anally raped your mom!”

Um… Yeah… We’re gonna go ahead and go…

There is supposed to be at least some plausibility if you’re going to partake in the media’s Trump fame game. Khizr Khan is a Muslim, and Trump previously proposed a Muslim ban. The Squad includes a Somali refugee, and Trump had tweeted that she should “go back.” Liz Cheney is a registered Republican, and Trump is head of the party.

See how it works?

Cue Bragg: Let’s put Trump in jail by arguing he lied on business records to quietly settle a personal matter!

Okay, Bragg, but was there a victim, or was it a ridiculously large sum of money? Has this even been tried before?

Bragg: Not at all!

Um… Yeah… We’re gonna go ahead and go.

X22, Christian Patriot News, and more- April 6

 

Our French Revolution ~ VDH

America now has three potential futures 

and two are bad. 

by Victor Davis Hanson for American Greatness

We are in a Jacobin Revolution of the sort that in 1793-94 nearly destroyed France. And things are getting scary. 

The Democratic Party vanished sometime in 2020. 

It was absorbed by hard-left ideologues. They were bent on radically altering, or hijacking, existing institutions to force radical, equality-of-result agendas that otherwise do not earn majority support. 

The American people want affordable power and fuel and energy autonomy. They do not want a Green New Deal that results in dependence on the Middle East. 

They want fiscal sobriety, not a permanent stagflationary economy marked by bank failures, soaring interest rates, crony capitalism, and subsidies for those who choose not to work. 

They know no country can exist without a border, much less while offering blank checks to foreign cartels that kill 100,000 Americans yearly. 

They demand realist deterrence abroad, not the current woke military whose erosion is spelling the end American credibility and global stability. 

Racialists are eerily embracing discredited Neo-Confederate notions of racial chauvinism, discrimination, segregation, and the old-one-drop rule of racial obsession. They are turning America toward a Balkanized war-of-all-against-all. 

To implement such an unpopular program, the new Left must radically alter our institutions. 

So the “Democrats” periodically threaten to pack the courts, end the filibuster, destroy the Electoral College, and override the states’ prerogatives to establish balloting laws. 

They deny the committee assignments of the House minority leader. They engage in stunts like tearing up the State of the Union address on national television. With impunity they mob the homes of Supreme Court justices to leverage their decisions. 

This revolution is run by elites and is a top-down operation. 

University deans all but prompt students to disrupt invited campus speakers. District attorneys release violent arrested criminals without bail. Woke generals call their Chinese counterparts to warn them against their own commander-in-chief. 

The Pentagon lectures the country on its supposed innate racism—even as the United States continues to lose wars abroad, abandons billions of dollars of equipment to terrorists, and allows communist China to surveille domestic American military bases with complete impunity. 

Words change their meanings. “Racist” now means “don’t dare object.” “White” became the pejorative stereotype used by racists. “Diversity” means tired orthodoxy. “Equity” is a synonym for bias. “Inclusion” ensures exclusion. 

Institutions are no longer recognizable. The FBI as we knew it no longer exists. Three former FBI directors either lied under oath to federal investigators, or pleaded amnesia in congressional testimonies. 

Our highest former national intelligence officers lied under oath to the Senate. The IRS is weaponized against political opponents of the Democrats. The Department of Justice is more likely to send the FBI after grammar school parents than mobs threatening the homes of Supreme Court justices. 

Still, to thoroughly erase America, our Jacobins must radically alter our customs and traditions. 

So under the cover of the COVID quarantines, Election Day was made irrelevant. In the new America, 70 percent did not vote on the designated day but, fueled by third-party vote harvesting and relaxation of audits of non-Election-Day ballots, extended the vote over a period of several weeks. 

Like the Jacobins, names and dates had to be radically transformed. 1619, not 1776, is now America’s birthdate and, we are told, it was an ignominious one. 

Statues are toppled, careers Trotskyized. 

Biological males suddenly have hijacked women’s sports—destroying five decades of women’s hard-won efforts to achieve equal treatment and respect in athletics. 

What triggered the collective madness and this Jacobin takeover? 

The Left’s perfect storm of the 120 days of riot, death, arson and looting of 2020? The COVID pandemic? The disastrous two-year lockdown? The 2016 election of the outsider Donald Trump? 

All those catalysts and more. 

As the country collapses under leftist nihilism, the revolution’s last gasp is to destroy Donald Trump—by empowering him. That is, the leftist legal vendetta is designed to win him just enough empathy to be nominated the Republican Party’s presidential candidate, but then to keep on indicting, gagging, and hemorrhaging him legally until Election Day 2024. 

Trump was the first president to be impeached twice, to be tried by the Senate as a private citizen, and to have his private home raided by the FBI. Now he is the first president to have been indicted, effectively ending America’s moral authority abroad.

America now has three potential futures and two are bad. 

First, the Jacobins have two more years to finish what they started as the founders’ dream descends into our worst nightmare. 

Second, the revolution has so warped our legal system, our voting on Election Day, and the FBI, the CIA, the Justice Department, and the IRS, that even a despised, unpopular Left will “win” elections. 

The third is that New York prosecutor Alan Bragg has jumped the shark. 

His pathetic prosecution is so patently incoherent, illiberal, and in spirit anti-American, that two-thirds of the country will soon conclude the center is not holding. The Jacobins’ reign of terror is unsustainable. And so in 2024 the Left will not be defeated, but so defeated so that it is utterly discredited. 

The choice is ours.

Trans-Militants and Their Supporters

The tolerance for political violence from approved minority communities will only fuel more radicalism, and more left-wing extremism.

by Kyle Shideler for American Greatness

On March 27, Aubrey Hale, a 28-year-old female who identified as a man, opened fire on students and staff at the Covenant School, a private Christian school in Nashville, Tennessee. Hale murdered three children and three adults, before being shot dead by responding law enforcement officers. Nashville Police confirmed that Hale’s transgenderism was believed to have played a role in her motivation for the attack, but specifics are scarce. Police reportedly have a manifesto found in Hale’s vehicle at the scene, but it has not been made available to the public. 

Tennessee has been in the news in recent months following the passage of legislation intended to prevent the chemical or surgical transition of minors and to prohibit sexually explicit drag show performances before audiences of children. In response to such legislative efforts taking place nationwide, a Trans Day of Vengeance was being promoted by a variety of militant trans liberation groups and known Antifa groups on social media and included efforts to raise funds for armed training to transgender individuals. The attack took place only days prior to the Trans Day of Vengeance, which itself was scheduled to coincide with a “Trans Day of Visibility.” Terrorists will sometimes schedule attacks to coincide with dates ideologically significant to their cause, so it is prudent that any potential linkage between the dates should be investigated.

There has been a growing militancy within the trans-liberation movement and an alignment with Antifa and similar armed anarcho-communist groups.

Black-garbed Antifa, wearing body armor and armed with AR-15 or AK-model rifles, now routinely appear at protests and counter-protests related to the drag show and transition debate. Sharp-eyed observers might have noticed these individuals wearing patches, flags, and stickers displaying the transgender flag overlaid with an AR- or AK- style rifle. 

Other iconography includes t-shirts like the one worn by Minnesota’s Lt. Governor Peggy Flanagan featuring a dagger with the command “Protect Trans Kids,” although from what they should be protected is not explained. Another popular shirt displays various types of firearms before issuing the threat “trans rights . . . or else.” Such materials have been increasingly mainstreamed and are even available for purchase on Amazon(dot)com.

A simple online search of the term TERF (which stands for Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist, meaning a woman typically on the Left who opposes men presenting as women and taking advantage of rights or advantages won by feminists) provides nearly endless examples of transgender exhortations to vivid or stylized violence. 

As journalist Andy Ngo has noted, a statistically significant number of transgender individuals have affiliated with (primarily left-wing) extremism. Yet it is not immediately obvious why this should be so. 

What is the link between transgenderism and the promotion of Antifa-style violence? Why do the rifle and the trans flag go together?

To begin with, dispense with the notion that this trend has anything to do with the Second Amendment. Every American citizen regardless of gender or sexual preference has the inalienable right granted by our Creator and enshrined in the Bill of Rights to bear arms in their own defense. But these are not the rights being demanded with the elliptical “or else.”

In this context, self-defense is understood not as the right of an individual to protect his or her life and property but rather as a collective right used to assert the “defense of communities as such.” This means that bearing arms can be used by self-appointed “community defense” groups to enforce the “political demands of people of color, women, immigrants, queers, and poor people.” 

In the same way Antifa members saw themselves as obligated to use force in support of Black Lives Matter in the George Floyd Riots of 2020, these trans groups also see themselves as obligated to defended the transgender “community” against the will of the majority of Americans and their elected representatives in those states which pass laws to protect children.

This overt conflation of physical safety and political demands has been deeply embedded in the political discourse surrounding transgenderism. Its advocates insist that to pass laws prohibiting the irreversible medical transitioning of children is equivalent to “trans genocide” because of suicide rates among self-identified transgender youth. This is despite evidence that transitioning children does not actually work to improve mental health outcomes and the growing numbers of detransitioners who have come forward to criticize youth transitioning efforts. 

Still this rhetoric of genocide has been increasingly normalized, in effect justifying political violence against those perceived as opposing the transgender movement’s demands.

Furthermore, state legislative efforts to counter the most extreme gender identity ideology, ranging from preventing pornographic books from being displayed in school libraries to banning the medical transitioning of minor children, are a rare example of effective conservative political activism. That their opponents might successfully organize politically, hold rallies or protests, conduct campaigns, and achieve legislative success is anathema to Antifa and its ilk. Their fundamental reason for existing is to prevent political opponents from organizing politically. 

The other link between modern left-wing extremist obsession with transgenderism has to do with another type of “trans,” namely transgression. The need to break down and overcome American societal norms is deeply embedded within the tradition of the American New Left radicals from the late 1960s and early 1970s. Breaking through and abandoning their own “privilege” was an obsession for middle class white radicals of the 1960s. As former Communist Party member Ted Allen wrote in “Can the White Radicals be Radicalized,” “If in doubt at first, just make a list of the privileges and start violating them.” 

The Weather Underground (the direct linear antecedent of today’s modern Antifa) deliberately introduced sexual practices including group sex and homosexuality as part of their “Smash Monogamy” campaign. The effort was intended to strengthen unity among the Weather collective and break down the remnants of its members’ patriarchal and heteronormative worldviews. 

By abandoning their middle-class “white privilege” through transgressive sexuality they could thus render themselves more able to fulfill the needs of the revolution. Or so it was thought. The effort had the added benefit of making the group harder for law enforcement to infiltrate. 

Today the adoption of a transgender identity breaks norms not merely in a symbolic way (as the Weather Underground orgies were thought to do) but allows the radical to adopt a physical identity which is consistent with the Left’s political hierarchy of oppressed classes.

This mindset of constructed classes of oppressed and oppressor dominates even the mainstream liberal Democrat establishment, causing it to adopt what is effectively Antifa-style language. 

The Biden Administration has repeatedly reinforced its support for such language, defining state legislatures passing laws in accordance with their constituents’ wishes as literally “fascism.” Only days after a transgender individual murdered Christian children, the Biden Administration rushed to the defense of the transgender movement, issuing a statement calling elected state legislators “MAGA extremists” and the democratic passage of state laws “un-American attacks.” The administration’s rhetoric has been mirrored across the media and cultural spectrum, effectively rewarding terrorist violence with a nationwide platform. 

The tolerance for political violence from approved minority communities, will only fuel more radicalism, and more left-wing extremism.

People suspected of living illegally in UK to have bank accounts closed

 

Banking checks on accounts opened by people suspected to be living in the UK illegally have been restarted by the Home Office, as officials relaunch a controversial hostile environment policy that was suspended following the Windrush scandal.

The current accounts will be closed in a new data-sharing agreement with the financial sector. The initiative is part of a package of measures designed to deter illegal migration and illegal working, by making it harder for people without confirmed immigration status to be paid.

The measure was initially rolled out in January 2018, but was suspended a few months later by the then home secretary, Sajid Javid, amid doubts over the reliability of the checks after the government acknowledged that it had misclassified thousands of members of the Windrush generation as illegal immigrants, when it became clear that the Home Office was unable to distinguish accurately between people living in the UK legally and those without the correct immigration status.

Announcing the decision to suspend the programme five years ago, the Home Office said: “It is right, in light of Windrush, that we review existing safeguards to ensure that those who are here lawfully are not inadvertently disadvantaged by measures put in place to tackle illegal migration.”

The decision to relaunch the banking checks was condemned by the human rights organisation Amnesty, which warned that people “with good claims and even rights” to be in the UK could be prevented from banking by the measure.  

A Home Office statement said: “Making it more difficult for unlawful migrants to access financial services is an important tool to help deter illegal migration.”

The immigration minister, Robert Jenrick, said there would be “robust safeguards in place to prevent wrongful account closures”, adding: “Only those known to be here unlawfully or those who have absconded from immigration control will have their details shared.” 

The measures do not require bank staff to check customers’ documents and assess their immigration status; instead, the Home Office will share details of people they believe to be ineligible for banking services in the UK via an anti-fraud organisation. Banks and building societies will then be obliged to check their current account holders against these lists.  

Bank accounts will only be closed when the Home Office has made a further manual check to ensure that that the customer is in the UK without permission to stay, officials said.

“We are committed to going further and faster to prevent the abuse of our laws and borders. Illegal working causes untold harm to our communities, cheating honest workers of employment and defrauding the public purse,” Jenrick said.

Steve Valdez-Symonds, the refugee and migrant rights programme director at Amnesty UK, said the policy was “intended to indiscriminately exclude and socially isolate a mass of people – many of whom with good claims and even rights to be in the country, and others bearing little or no culpability in how they have come to be here without permission”.  

The relaunch of the initiative came as Windrush campaigners marked the fifth anniversary of the scandal by handing a petition signed by 50,000 people to Downing Street, calling on the government to rethink a decision to drop several key reform recommendations made in the wake of the scandal.

The letter, whose signatories include the actor David Harewood and the singer Beverley Knight, described the axing of these recommendations as a “kick in the teeth to the Windrush generation, to whom our country owes such a huge debt of gratitude”. A vigil was later held at Windrush Square in Brixton, south London, and candles lit in memory of those people who were affected by the Home Office’s mistakes but who died before receiving compensation.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/06/people-suspected-of-living-illegally-in-uk-to-have-bank-accounts-closed?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter   

A Message

posted by Sundance at Conservative Treehouse 

I’ve never reached out to anyone in the orbit of Donald Trump, and I do not consider myself of any importance to do so. However, if I could send one message it would be this….

[Image Credit, Joshua Youngbluth]

We need a big picture focus right now. Do not be distracted by the smallness of men and their constructs.

The landscape of our national challenge is in a much bigger focus. Connect to the sense surrounding the instability that everyone, even globally, feels amid their lives.

Give direction, context and understanding to that sense, then connect directly to it.

Expand and elevate beyond the schemes, frauds and manipulations.

Lead that level of victory. The rest will follow.

Which brings me to another point….

The number one question people ask is a variation on ‘what can we do?’ 

It is a natural and logical question, from an audience that: (1) understands the scope of the challenge at hand; and (2) wants to engage in tangible action to solve the problem.

However, keep in mind YOU are in the rare space of an intellectual discernment in the top tier knowledge base.

Having spent several weeks in prayer over this very specific question, let me reframe the dynamic in a way I feel compelled -by outcome of that prayer- to answer.

Put your thoughts into the form of a vessel, willing to deliver in just about any way possible.  What do you want me to do?

Now, let me outline context for this question.

Beyond the keystrokes, I have traveled in this journey. I have been into the heart of the beast several times. I have researched, investigated, discussed, questioned, dug into and reviewed just about every possible angle of our current state of government at issue.  I have written about those discoveries, some open – some oblique, in a myriad of articles explaining the dynamic as it presents; not as we wish it exists, but in the raw reality of the issue as it manifests & sits afore us.

As an outcome of this journey, I have been investigated, threatened, questioned, subpoenaed and brought before tribunals for inquisition as to the substantive claims of my affirmations.

What I have learned is a simple but powerful truism; the truth of the thing is a defense to every attack against the messenger of the thing.

Those who retain lies and deceptions as a matter of policy, institutional structure or motive, want nothing to do with these simple calloused hands with genuine questions and a research library filled with citations, evidence and supportive documentation, dragged out from within the silos they attempt to hide.

Believe me, there are very few good people in/around our body politic that want anything to do with the truth and evidence of the corruption within it.

In my experience, when you lay naked evidence of the wretchedness and corruption, even the honorable people amid the various institutions recoil in fear of it.  How does that recoil manifest?  They quit.  Straight up true.  They quit.

I have witnessed multiple people in tenured positions of power and influence  just up and quit their position once they realize the sunlight is visible not only to me, but to everyone else who might choose to do the investigative legwork.

Simultaneous to this aversion, media constructs -and I do mean all of them- who operate a business model dependent on discussing the corruption, have no interest in actually outlining the scale and apolitical nature of the corruption, let alone participate in the solving of it.

If media were to get to the root of the issue, then outline it and pour sunlight upon it, they would have exhausted their stash upon which they build the very foundation of their business model.

Considering the aforementioned experiences, when Mike Lindell smiles and says, “I wish they would sue me or indict me”, I totally relate to why he feels that way.

The opposition is weak, filled with fraud and their constructs are easily dismissed; better yet, when attacked they collapse.  That’s why you never see the professional republicans attacking those constructs.

As long as the corrupt pretenses are retained, there is always something to rail against.  This is the business model of DC’s congressional representation.

Two wings of the same vulture. The RNC wants money. The DNC wants power. The RNC uses power to get money. The DNC uses money to get power. The donor activity of the RNC drives their ideology. The ideology of the DNC drives their donor activity. This is the essential difference in the business models of both wings.

Our national politics is only one aspect to the dynamic of the systems that seem to surround us.  Those pretenses are in place, specifically to give us a place to focus our attention as the puppets dance.   Take away the money and the music stops.  The money behind the Potemkin stage is what drives the script of the pantomime we watch.

So here’s the question in context.  Given the nature of the increased attack against the one entity who I feel well inclined to believe is the only non-participating entity in this performance, namely Donald J. Trump, I have situated myself to do just about anything in support of removing or exposing the fraud.  What would you have me do?

I offer myself to you as a vessel, ready willing and able to do just about anything that would ultimately change the dynamic of the issues that surround us.  I can travel, meet, discuss, deliver, challenge, confront and present just about anything to anyone.  Their sh!t doesn’t scare me.

Additionally, I have just enough contacts, albeit with some effort and markers called, to reach into just about any system or institution and get positioned at the heart of the matter.  And I stand ready willing and able to take you with me and outline the journey in almost real time as it takes place, with good, bad or indifferent results presented with brutal honesty.

From your perspective, what, where, when, and to whom would this effort be best deployed?

Let me know your suggestions and advice.  Upvote each idea in the comments section as you find merit to the proposition.

We all know the goals; perhaps I know the enemy encampments better than most, and perhaps I carry a totally different arsenal.

You are in the top intellectual class of everyone. You operate cognitively in the rarefied air of wisdom, intellect, discernment and logic that few can fathom. You are smart, brilliant, loyal, insightful, patriotic and you love this country.  We are the furnace; they are the gnats.  It is important for you to feel that power in your bones.  Weaponize me…

I will review every response and ultimately, I will quite literally take the action anticipated to deliver the best possible outcome.

“His Kind” Is YOU !

posted by Sundance at Conservative Treehouse 

Now it’s Glen Youngkin.  Virginia Governor Youngkin said in a release on Tuesday that he will lead a Virginia delegation to Taipei City, Taiwan, Tokyo, and Seoul, South Korea, from April 24-29.

Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis, John Bolton, Asa Hutchinson, Glen Youngkin… The Republican wing of the UniParty is throwing everything possible and pulling every level within their control, including last night’s outcome in Wisconsin, in order to retain the illusion of political parties as the source/solution within a nation collapsing.

None of what DC Democrats, Republicans, the RNC or DNC presents is true or real within the landscape of the conflict tearing our nation apart.  This is where the battle between pretending and reality is taking shape.  I am not sure how we get this message communicated when the communication networks are purchased as part of the fraud.

On the positive side, every day more people are becoming aware of their false assumptions.  Every day the social compact between citizens and elected officials is being scrutinized.  Every day more people are starting to realize everything they thought about the construct of government in the United States is something entirely different.

We send politicians to stop the madness of government, but nothing changes.  Why?

Washington DC is a Potemkin village.

We focus on the visible, but the constructs that impact us do not originate from the false facade.  There’s something behind that facade, and what we see is…. entirely… a facade.  That’s why sending the politicians doesn’t change the outcome.  To get to the core of the issue, we must first stop looking at the Potemkin village, and instead look behind it.

Legislation, rules, regulations and laws are not written by congress.  The paperwork comes from the assembly of legal and lobbyist foot soldiers on K-Street.  That’s where the ink is put to the paper, and the legislative outcomes first originate.  K-Street is where the corporations, multinationals and financial organizations control the process.

If the corporations behind the DC facade want to shift the money, they proactively write the rules, regulations and laws that steer the actual policy outcomes to their financial target or destination.  Their wealth expands, and they reward the participants, the politicians.

Most of the entry level politicians are oblivious to where the corporations have proactively moved; however, a few of the politicians -the leadership groups- know exactly where the destination of the legislative intent is going.  The latter are tenured in the power structure behind the facade.

Two private domestic corporations, completely unaffiliated with the constructs of constitutional government, known as the RNC and DNC, require membership in order to participate in the pretense of American democracy.  The same financial entities that fund the K-Street operation, fund the private political clubs.

We The People, voters, are engaging in their construct to send ‘representatives’ into a political construct that is a facade.  The financial entities on K-Street, those who position wealth and generate the rules to maintain it, are the same financial entities that fund the mechanisms of the two private corporations (RNC/DNC).

The United States system of government is now operating to maintain this construct of common benefit.

The institutions within our government are now operating with the primary purpose of maintaining this system.  Maintaining the Potemkin village is their first line of defense, to stop any larger awakening from recognizing the futility of sending ‘representatives‘ into the woodchipper.

All of the institutions we discuss are mission-focused on preserving the system as described.  The intelligence community, the federal police, the federal courts and every institution and subsidiary agency within this construct now operate to preserve the DC system.  A system where the core of the originating activity does not take place in the Potemkin village of our focus.

The two political parties, two private corporations, funded by the multinationals and financial interests, are intended to keep us focused on the village.  As long as we focus on the false front, the system can operate as designed.  The financial institutions behind the village retain and hold the power; the politicians -many unwittingly- fulfill their role, and the bread and circuses are maintained.   This is the baseline for what comes next.

In 2016 we disrupted the system.  We threw an anvil into the woodchipper when we nominated then elected, Donald J. Trump.

“His kind” is you!

Trump didn’t come with the private club approvals.  The private RNC corporation, meaning the people within it who control the operations of it, was not okay with the non-approved member getting the 2016 nomination.   The multinationals and financial donor institutions who control the RNC corporation were furious.

The DC corporations who are at the epicenter of the power structure in Washington DC, did not and do not approve.

The woodchipper could not handle the anvil we threw in it.

Immediately, all of the mechanisms of the system, a system entirely designed to defend and protect itself, were laser focused on removing that anvil.

This battle is not an issue about political parties. The same interests that are funding Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley or even Glen Younkin are not focused on political parties.

The multinationals, billionaire donors, corporate constructs and Wall Street financiers are not concerned about political parties. Their issue of priority is self-preservation of a system, this system – built and exploited upon the backs of American workers, created to keep We The People within controllable boundaries, while preserving their status.

This fight, within the American system of government, is not an issue of political parties. The same people funding Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley or Glen Youngkin will just as quickly support California Governor Gavin Newsom or Former U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice in the general election of 2024.

Their unified opposition, the only person they cannot permit to succeed, is the one person who threatens the system they seek to preserve. That person is Donald John Trump.

Removing Donald Trump from the equation is not about political battles between parties. Removing Donald Trump from the equation is mitigating the existential threat he represents because his specific policies and outlooks are focused on America First.

President Trump represents the interests of the American people; that makes him dangerous to Big Club’s life of affluence, influence and control.

Republicans and Democrats cannot permit Trump to succeed, but the powers these interests use to achieve their goals are derived from We The People.

We can change the dynamic.  They can be defeated if we withdraw our consent.