Tuesday, March 7, 2023

Personal Sacrifice Is Nourishment for the Soul


"A sad soul can kill you quicker, far quicker, than a germ," John Steinbeck tenderly wrote.  To look around America today is to see the painful proof of this truth.  COVID and other pathogens have nothing on the deleterious effects of hopelessness and despair.  When people give up on themselves, their towns, and their futures, they look as if they're treading water against the current, seeking any reason just to stop kicking and sink.

I don't know if there's a politician in Washington who actually knows what ails America.  If there are any, I'm not sure they even care.  Politics is a profession predicated on creating new problems, blaming them on someone else, pretending to solve them, and getting paid while they get worse.  For half a century or more, Americans have begged politicians to secure their borders, end the heartbreaking genocide wrought by drug cartels, and protect blue-collar towns from extinction.  The politicians have given them open borders, intergenerational drug addiction, cultural degradation, lost communities, and bleak prospects.  

Many people placed their faith in the false notion that electing a president because of his darker skin would somehow translate into policies that would help those with dark skin, too.  Instead, those who clamored for "hope and change" found only more violence and murder, greater dependency, fewer opportunities, and further misery.  Because politicians cultivate power by creating endless social division, they cannot ever lead desperate people toward salvation.  A peaceful, happy society is a society that can be neither exploited nor tamed.  Only by first breaking the people from their will to live can those with power profit from their submission.

While elected officials and judges have spent decades purging religious teachings, classical virtues, and civic responsibilities from schools and the public square, they have filled those empty spaces with celebrations of sin, vice, and self-indulgence.  By first creating a spiritual wasteland for America's youth and then filling that desolation with the rancid filth of a toxic junkyard, generations of Americans cannot now distinguish between what is rotten and what is priceless.  Family, faith, friendship, fellowship, and freedom have slipped away for so many, while politicians distract them with the sparkly trinkets of self-gratification, sexual confusion, grievance, animosity, and the slowly suffocating weight of welfare's chains.  Rather than beseech citizens to live good lives, politicians whisper devilishly, "Take what's not yours."  Instead of encouraging citizens to find spiritual meaning, politicians preach that nothing means anything at all.  They vilify religion and repentance, while constructing altars against racism, climate change, hate speech, and free will, so that the lost and hopeless have new things to blame or lead them astray.  In carefully constructed, seductive words, America's politicians blaspheme, "God is dead; worship us instead."

Then some of those same destroyers of lives look at the agony sweeping across America and incredulously wonder why things have gotten so bad.  A sad soul kills far quicker than a germ.  Not COVID, nor climate change, nor income inequality, nor global war kills so coldly as those who drown their countrymen with lies, extinguish purpose from their lives, and sap a nation's spirit of meaning.

Political philosopher Thomas Hobbes argued that without powerful government, life in a state of nature would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short."  Men would kill each other, take what they want, and build nothing new.  Yet those with caring families or resilient small towns know that not to be true.  Furthermore, anyone who has either lived through war or has loved ones who have knows that violence does not come easily for most.  One look inside a veterans' hospital or a homeless encampment filled with warriors struggling from PTSD would convince anyone that battle and bloodshed scar both mind and soul.  Men quite naturally avoid violence, while governments quite naturally unleash it.  Take a hard look around the country today.  Under the biggest, most expensive government in the history of the world, Americans are suffering through unforgiving epidemics of loneliness, poverty, incivility, criminality, confusion, self-mutilation, suicide, and defeat.

Neither politicians nor the government they revere will ever fix what troubles America.  Only fools would expect those who have caused the damage capable of furnishing the repairs.  What is broken cannot be restored through endless money-printing, false promises, pantomime investigations, superficial overhauls, or fake tears.  If government is not the answer, though, then nobody need waste time waiting for government solutions that will never appear.

Ask yourself how America has gone from a confident, capable, energetic nation of hard workers looking to be free and spread good to a country lost in its way; starving for purpose; and led by petty tyrants, backstabbing misanthropes, and chickenhawk cowards.  How have American courage, ingenuity, and grit become eclipsed by pusillanimity, dullness, and lily-livered fear?  A nation without spirit has no future, and a people without hearty souls can provide no spirit.

The politicians may have broken the people, but only the people can heal themselves.  That's good news.

Does thinking about America's future in those terms change things?  Yes.  When we refuse to cede our fates to those we abhor and instead claim total responsibility for a future of our own making, then the things that do not matter disappear, and the things that matter most can be seen clearly.  For this nation to long endure, its people must live again, and for the American people to live again, they must live beyond today.  They must feel that tingle down their spines, as they remember that an Almighty God keeps them from ever being alone.  They must feel that choke in the back of their throats as the inescapable truth sets in that every life has purpose.  With hungry souls in desperate need of spiritual food, Americans must open their hearts and minds to the proposition that they are completely known by a loving and forgiving God graciously offering salvation.

Followers of Jesus Christ learn a striking lesson from His teachings.  Two thousand years ago, people lived in basic homes without modern comforts.  Hunger and disease were rampant, as they still are in too many places around the world today.  Political turmoil, violence, and war regularly destroyed lives, as they still do now.  Most people were illiterate and had little time to create or enjoy art.  Looking around at the fallen world, though, God did not send humanity an engineer, plumber, biologist, inventor, military general, author, or artist — at least not in the strictest sense of those words.  More than all of the other problems plaguing this world, it is mankind's suffering from sin and desperation for forgiveness that touch everything.  In agony, we wretched sinners long for absolution, and in answering our prayers, God sent a Savior to offer redemption.

Imagine if our political leaders spoke of forgiveness and redemption as much as they do division, blame, and hate.  Society would have a completely different outlook and direction if Americans ignored those who choose to set us against each other and instead recognized that within all of us lies common suffering.  The world would dance to a different tune if citizens worried about their souls as much as politicians worry about their power.

That requires personal sacrifice — a conscious choice to follow the hard path, even when the easy one beckons.  There's a secret, though, that politicians don't know and would never tell you.  When humans follow the voice inside their heads, sacrifice comes naturally.  You see it on the battlefield, when a spouse loves unconditionally, and when those wronged choose to forgive wholeheartedly.  Humans know what's right and wrong and can help save themselves when acting accordingly.



X22, Christian Patriot News, and more- March 7

 



For those looking for a real good ditty to cheer yourself up with, here is 1 of the best things South Park gave us:


‘Twitter Files’ Show More Groups Used Hamilton 68’s Bogus Methodology To Sell The Russia Hoax

The government pushed for censorship based on bogus analyses from outsiders claiming accounts were pushing ‘foreign disinformation.’



The federal government and the think tanks it funds asked Twitter to censor tens of thousands of users based on bogus analyses that pegged the accounts as pushing “foreign disinformation,” the latest installment of the “Twitter Files” reveals. 

On Thursday, independent journalist Matt Taibbi revealed that in addition to the fraudulent Hamilton 68 dashboard, at least three other groups pushed faulty “foreign disinformation” models, including the State Department’s Global Engagement Center, the Atlantic Council’s Forensic Research Lab, and the now-disband scandal-plagued group, New Knowledge, raising new questions about the breadth of the tangled Censorship Complex web.

The Global Engagement Center

The Global Engagement Center is an interagency center, housed in the State Department, that was tasked in 2016 with leading the federal government’s efforts to counter what it called “disinformation.” While the Global Engagement Center previously made several appearances in the “Twitter Files,” last week’s release of internal Twitter communications exposed a bigger scandal: The Global Engagement Center’s “ecosystem” approach to detecting supposed foreign disinformation was a “laughable” “crock,” according to Twitter’s experts.

To identify supposedly foreign disinformation accounts, the Global Engagement Center looked at hashtags and connections. “If you retweet a news source linked to Russia, you become Russia-linked,” one Twitter executive scoffed, adding: “Does not exactly resonate as a sound research approach.” 

Other emails showed Twitter’s team bemused at the ridiculous rationales the Global Engagement Center offered to support censorship requests. For instance, it equated a high volume of tweets with being a bot, connected involvement in the “yellow vest” movement in France with being a Russia-aligned account, and concluded that pro-China accounts were Russia-linked — except anti-China sentiments expressed in Italy were considered Russia-connected as well. And the Global Engagement Center saw “a surge in accounts that agreed with Moscow-aligned narratives” as meaning “Moscow controlled.” 

The Global Engagement Center’s accusations of foreign disinformation are “unverified” and “can’t be replicated by either external academics or by Twitter — so they aren’t operating with the greatest of credibility when they make pronouncements about accounts/widespread disinfo,” read another internal Twitter email. 

“Anyone can make unsubstantiated allegations, and if they release their” data, “they will likely get laughed out of the room by real researchers,” is how the Twitter team saw the “evidence” of foreign disinformation peddled by the Global Engagement Center.

Did It Follow Hamilton 68’s Methods?

One person working as a contractor for the Global Engagement Center until June 2017 was J.M. Berger, who helped develop the Hamilton 68 dashboard that purported to track Russian disinformation. Berger stressed to Taibbi, however, that at no point “did GEC have any input or involvement whatsoever with the Hamilton dashboard.” 

Even if the Global Engagement Center wasn’t involved with the Hamilton 68 dashboard, that’s only half the equation. What about Berger’s work with the Global Engagement Center? 

Given that in creating Hamilton 68, the Alliance for Securing Democracy “employed social network analytical techniques largely developed by J.M. Berger and Jonathon Morgan,” and that the dashboard has been outed as a sham, Berger’s work with the State Department raises serious questions. Did Berger share the same flawed methodologies used for the Hamilton 68 project with the Global Engagement Center?

New Knowledge Is the New Hamilton 68

Berger’s work with Morgan on the faulty Hamilton 68 dashboard triggers further questions about a disinformation report prepared by “New Knowledge,” the cybersecurity company Morgan founded in 2015 that also made an appearance in Thursday’s “Twitter Files.”

The New Knowledge team, led by supposed “disinformation” experts — Renee DiResta, the then-director of research at New Knowledge, and Jonathan Albright, an academic out of Columbia University’s Tow Center for Digital Journalism — prepared a 101-page report for the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee that purported to reveal “the scope of Russia’s efforts during the 2016 election to cause discord among American citizens and sway the election.” 

Morgan claimed New Knowledge “deployed” its “technology in collaboration with Clint Watts, J.M. Berger, and Andrew Weisburd for the Securing Democracy Project’s Hamilton68 dashboard.” This raises the obvious question: Was New Knowledge’s report to the Senate Intelligence Committee another Hamilton 68 disinformation sham?

Twitter’s internal communications published last week also reveal the tech giant questioning the expertise of these players. When asked by a New York Times reporter why Twitter hadn’t hired “independent researchers” like DiResta, Albright, and Morgan, one executive retorted, “The word ‘researcher’ has taken on a very broad meaning.” 

The Atlantic Council’s Forensic Research Lab

Another player in what Twitter executives called the misinformation “cottage industry,” was the Atlantic Council. While the Atlantic Council’s involvement in the disinformation business was previously known, the most recent release of the “Twitter Files” now reveals the group’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, or DFRLab, pushed censorship requests based on bogus research.

In June of 2021, an analyst from the DFRLab wrote to Twitter claiming its researchers suspected “around 40k twitter accounts” of “engaging in inauthentic behavior … and Hindu nationalism more broadly.” It also provided Twitter with a spreadsheet of those accounts. Those 40,000 accounts, the DFRLab said, are suspected of being “paid employees or possibly volunteers” of India’s Bharatiya Janata Party.

“But the list was full of ordinary Americans, many with no connection to India,” Taibbi stressed. And an email response from Twitter’s then-head of trust and safety, Yoel Roth, confirmed he had “spot-checked a number of these accounts, and virtually all appear to be real people.”

While the Atlantic Council now claims it didn’t publish the “former researcher’s” report on the 40,000 accounts, “because we lacked confidence in its findings,” the fact that the Atlantic Council’s lab sent Twitter faulty research raises yet more questions given the group’s relationship with two other players in the Censorship Complex: the Election Integrity Partnership and the Global Disinformation Index.

During the 2020 election, the Election Integrity Partnership, of which the Atlantic Council was one of four members, fed censorship requests of supposed disinformation to Twitter. Did the Atlantic Council provide the Election Integrity Partnership with similarly unsupported claims of foreign disinformation related to the 2020 election? Did the Election Integrity Partnership then pass those censorship requests on to Twitter? And did Twitter respond by blocking the accounts?

The Atlantic Council’s DFRLab also shares a connection to the Global Disinformation Index, which was recently outed for publishing a blacklist for advertisers that targeted conservative outlets. The lab’s founder and a former senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, Ben Nimmo, who is now the global lead at Meta, served as an advisory panel member for the Global Disinformation Index. In conducting its “research,” did the Global Disinformation Index incorporate any of the flawed methodologies or techniques used by the DFRLab?

Likewise, the Atlantic Council connects back to the State Department and the Global Engagement Center, with the latter funding the DFRLab. The director at the Atlantic Council, Graham Brookie, however, denied its lab “uses tax money to track Americans, saying its GEC grants have ‘an exclusively international focus.’” 

Of course, cash is fungible, but beyond the government funding of the Atlantic Council’s DFRLab, Americans should be concerned by the breadth of disinformation being spread about disinformation. Now a total of four players in the Censorship Complex — the Atlantic Council’s DFRLab, the Global Engagement Center, New Knowledge, and the Alliance for Securing Democracy’s Hamilton 68 dashboard — are shown to have spread false charges of foreign disinformation. And that number is likely much higher, as Roth made clear in an email released last week that it is not “technologically possible to accurately identify potential Russian fingerprints on Twitter accounts through our public-facing” system. 

Yet the government, directly and through government-funded think tanks, pushed for censorship based on bogus analyses from outsiders claiming accounts were pushing “foreign disinformation.” And so, a cottage industry was launched based on disinformation about disinformation.




BEWARE, Here Comes the Intel Community Laying Groundwork for FISA 702 Renewal


Ugh, it makes me sick to see these schemes as they are constructed and yet feel helpless to stop them from organizing.  Remember which media outlets push the PR campaigns of the U.S. Govt.  (1) CNN drives Dept of State; (2) Washington Post drives CIA; and (3) NYT/Politico advance the interests of the domestic intelligence apparatus.

With that in mind, here comes the Intelligence Community laying the groundwork for reauthorization of the FISA-702 surveillance system on American citizens.

They are so damned transparent in their agenda, the stenographers have even dropped “FISA,” the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, as the term within the construct.  Now they are just calling it “702 reauthorization.”

(VIA POLITICO) – The intelligence community has a critical congressional ally in its bid to reauthorize a sweeping warrantless surveillance program. However, even he thinks its officials aren’t making a convincing enough case.

“One of the things the community’s got to do a better job of is explaining, in practical non-classified terms, how valuable this tool is,” Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Mark Warner (D-Va.) said in a recent brief interview. “And they’ve not done that as well as they should.”

Warner sits at the heart of what will be a months-long, knockout debate about whether to reauthorize the warrantless surveillance program, known as Section 702, by the end-of-year deadline. The program is designed to gather the electronic communications of foreigners abroad, but has the potential to sweep up those of Americans.

The Virginian, who argues continuing the program in some form is essential but is open to changes, will have his work cut out for him. Influential and newly emboldened House Republicans have made it clear they won’t let Section 702 stay alive without significant changes — if they support reauthorization at all — amid an all-time-low relationship with the Justice Department and the FBI.

And the intelligence community can also count Section 702 critics among House Democrats and senators in both parties, many of whom believe this is their best chance to force more limits on the program. (read more)

As most people are now aware, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) sits at the epicenter of how the surveillance state is weaponized against American citizens.  It is the SSCI who helped create the surveillance network, and it is the SSCI who now seek to defend the unconstitutional system they have created.

Pretenses are being dropped, and you will note how in this reauthorization schedule they are dropping “foreign” communication with American citizens, as a limitation on the authority they have already usurped.  Yes, it is factually true the ‘foreign’ aspect was always a ruse, a false premise, that granted the Dept of Justice, National Security Division (DOJ-NSD), and FBI legal authority to conduct intrusive Title-1 surveillance on any American citizen.

Well beyond the “cell phone metadata,” in the era of your portable transponder having internet and social media connection, just about everyone has metadata connected to a foreign person or entity.  Use the Twitter app on your phone, you are connected to foreign entities.  Use Instagram or Facebook, WhatsApp or Telegram, same/same/same/same.

TicTok? Fughetaboudit.  The auspices of only looking at U.S. persons engaged in foreign contacts is totally moot.

The “702 authorities,” which is an innocuous term for a “U.S. Person“, permit DHS, DOJ, FBI and any national security apparatchik to open up your data and check you out. This is the reality of the modern era.  This total surveillance reauthorization is what the SSCI wants to permit.  It must be stopped completely.  It cannot be “reformed.”

4th Amendment – “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Either you are secure from federal search of your “private papers,” as outlined in the United States Constitution, or you are not.

There is no aspect of this “702” nonsense, where a secret court grants a secret authorization, to engage in secret surveillance, by some secret entity of government – which might be a contractor, just to “see if” you might be doing something suspicious, or against the interests of the federal government.  The premise behind “702” reauthorization is unconstitutional.

How strongly do I feel about this?

I will openly campaign against any politician or candidate who does not fully endorse the elimination of FISA 702 Authorization in sum and total.  I don’t care who the candidate is, or what his/her political affiliation might be.

I am sick and tired of having to construct communication systems, to engage in ordinary conversation and/or communication, knowing the biggest challenge is to construct the system to defend ordinary people against unconstitutional searches and seizures.  Ironically, this includes the very commenting system you are using to share any opinion of this outline.  This domestic surveillance system just needs to be stopped.

Steps off soapbox.

Love to all, but sheesh this is frustrating….


How Did All of this Happen?

How Did All of this Happen?

For almost three years I’ve been researching Covid topics. Based on this deep dive, I feel qualified to offer opinions on the question of how all the events of the last three years actually materialized.

Stated differently, how did all of this madness actually happen?

I quickly identified several big themes or pivotal events that help explain how so many nonsensical and harmful policies became a reality.

Readers can identify other features that were important in getting us to where we are today. As always, feedback is appreciated and welcome.

Note: “They” = public health officials, establishment authority figures and leaders, myriad vested interests who were all “on the same page” when it comes to Covid policies and narratives.

My partial list:

They sold fear … hard, incessantly, shamelessly, brazenly, unapologetically.

In short, hyper fear of a novel (and “deadly”) virus was THE prerequisite for everything that followed. So how was this mass fear/panic actually produced?

The groundwork must have begun many months and years before the “Wuhan outbreak.”

Multiple “table top” exercises (like Event 201) were conducted to lay the groundwork for what would follow

All the key “stakeholders” were recruited to participate in these events, often organized by groups like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Politicians, bureaucrats, key media members, physicians, scientists, and representatives of all the key agencies and organizations were recruited and then participated in these exercises.

Main-Takeaway: Advance “buy in” had already been achieved regarding the key premises of these table-top planning exercises. An event like Covid-19 had already been predicted and this was the blueprint for dealing with this … if you were going to be a part of the enlightened group that was going to help save the world.

Significantly, no participants ever questioned any of the assumptions built in to these exercises and when Covid was announced nobody wanted to challenge any of the responses. 

Appeals to authority, groupthink, wanting to support the “current thing” (to protect your status and career advancement opportunities) helped ensure that no significant dissenting voices would come forward to thwart or block the agreed-upon course of action.

Logistical and legislative actions had already been implemented to ensure nothing or no one could block the response.  “Emergency orders” of bureaucrats trumped the need for legislative votes, which were not even required to implement policies that turned the world upside down.

It now seems that the Department of Defense played a larger role (than most realized) in making the key decisions. 

Still, Fauci, Birx (a former military doctor), and Collins played a large role in orchestrating policy and getting the president to go along with their recommendations.

At some point, China’s response – locking down parts of their country – was endorsed as the bold and effective solution that should be used everywhere. The outbreak in northern Italy helped create more fear.

“There’s still time to stop the spread”

I’ve written many articles about “early spread.” However, one of the key planks explaining how what happened in America actually happened was the widespread belief that “late spread” of this virus was occurring. 

That is, the virus had not yet spread through America (and other countries) and thus it was wise and proactive to implement draconian lockdowns and non-pharmaceutical interventions to slow or stop the spread of the virus. The public was told that that they could “flatten the curve” with just two weeks of inconvenience.

Significantly, nobody in official capacity or the mainstream press ever questioned whether the virus may have already spread throughout much of the country or the world (even though cases of influenza-like illness were rampant in many sections of the country/world).

Getting physicians groups on board was key …

Organizers of the response, per their table top exercises and research, knew that physicians were among the “most trusted” people in the world. Officials quickly got all the leading medical associations to sign off on the grave threat.

Once the physicians groups were on board, the guidance or marketing became “listen to your physicians.”

The vast majority of leading scientists also quickly came on board … perhaps because they knew going against Anthony Fauci would jeopardize their future research grants.

No one in the mainstream press ever questioned the doomsday scenarios and indeed actively promoted the “this-must-be-done” narrative.

Censorship and cancellation of dissenting voices slowly and then rapidly became a priority. All social media, Big Tech and legacy media companies implemented “misinformation” guidelines that had rarely if ever been utilized.

Seeding, funding and establishing “misinformation” experts had actually begun months or years earlier. Almost all at once, these disinformation gurus sprung into action, further muzzling any significant “pushback” against the authorized narrative.

The Ivy League (of course) led the way …

I think a key event, rarely mentioned or remembered, was the decision of the Ivy League to cancel its conference basketball tournament in early March. The Ivy League is supposedly a repository of the brightest minds in the world. Once the Ivy League did this, the NBA and other organizations (The PGA cancelled a big golf tournament after one round) quickly followed. The dominoes started to fall and the momentum was set in motion.

Lesson: Be wary of the actions of the Ivy League or elite colleges.

The federal government actually could not compel any citizen, state or city to comply with its “guidance” but this didn’t matter as governors and mayors almost all at once implemented their own, more specific, lockdown orders. Or: They simply followed the federal “guidance.”

In retrospect, it’s fascinating that almost 100 percent of state and local officials “signed off” on such draconian mandates. It’s also worth noting that Gov. Ron DeSantis, the one prominent politician who did challenge the narrative, became a political superstar almost overnight.

Spreading the money …

To make it more likely that hospitals and medical clinics signed off on the various treatment guidelines and protocols, the federal government came up with numerous financial incentives (payouts) to get the hospitals and doctors to go along with their program. So hospitals received extra money for treating Covid patients or if someone was placed on a ventilator.

Congress enacted emergency funding to mollify many groups that might otherwise have suffered economic damages. New money was printed out of thin air. State governments were compensated for implementing the federal program.

Media organizations began to receive advertising funding for promoting Covid safety and, later promoting the vaccines.

Mandatory masking was ordered, which further promoted the requisite fear of the virus.

All big companies signed off on the Covid edicts even while many of their smaller competitors were put out of business, which was fine with the big guys. 

Somehow the churches put up no resistance. No influential or important organization put up any resistance. 

Psychology truisms were important ….

How did the organizers get virtually 100-percent compliance from all key stakeholders? The answer is found in psychological and sociological reasons: Nobody in a “leadership” role wanted to be a contrarian as this would be dangerous to their careers.

“We are all in this together” was the implied or explicit message. This was a great event in history (like fighting WWII) and the only way to defeat the “enemy” (the virus) was for all citizens to act together … and do what the experts said must be done. In other words, comply.

The fear was ramped up to a new level thanks to 40 to 45-cycle PCR tests suddenly flooding the market (as well as mandatory testing).

The media daily reported “new cases” and “new deaths,” most of which probably weren’t caused by this novel coronavirus.

It was rarely if ever mentioned that the average age of death of a Covid victim was around 82 – which is at or beyond the average life expectancy. 

Anyone who questioned the narrative was met with a rejoinder that “XXX,000” people have already died. Unspoken was the fact very few people personally knew one person under the age of 60 who had died, and these official deaths “from” Covid were massively inflated.

In late March 2020 through April 2020 huge spikes of deaths in certain cities like New York City, New Orleans, and Detroit received massive media coverage. 

Receiving virtually no media attention was the hundreds of other hospitals that were almost ghost towns.

The lockdowns lasted many months (even years) in some states … not “two weeks.” 

Nobody questioned why the check-out girls at the “essential” grocery stores were not becoming casualties of Covid even though they came in close contact with hundreds of customers every day and touched every item customers had put in their buggies.

Setting everyone up for ‘the most important thing’ – the vaccines 

At some point, the narrative (pushed by the experts) became that the only thing that would stop or end this pandemic was mass vaccination … so people just had to hold on until Pfizer and Moderna saved the world and ended the pandemic.

The vaccines arrived in “warp speed” and the world got a non-stop dose of this is a “pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated” stories.

People were fired for not getting vaccinated or pressured into getting vaccinated (although after the non-stop fear campaign, 75 percent of the country was rushing to their pharmacy to get their shots). Plus, all the medical experts recommended this and everyone trusted their doctors.

At some point, officials no longer needed to pressure the public into “fighting Covid.” Citizens took up the charge themselves. America became an “us against them” society – and the skeptics were the mangy dog “thems.” 

When people continued to get sick or infected after vaccination, the narrative became the shots lowered the likelihood you’d have a “severe case.”

The fact the vaccines did not work as advertised actually didn’t damper enthusiasm for the vaccines at all. The Covid vaccines became the only product in world history that was a colossal bust – but still generated record sales and demand.

A spike in “all-cause” deaths began days, weeks or months after the rollout of the vaccines, but these spikes in deaths were either not reported or were blamed on Covid. Never mentioned was that the vaccines were supposed to make Covid deaths an impossibility.

The “narrative” that the vaccines were “safe and effective” – probably repeated a billion times – was never challenged by anyone in official capacity. In many states and cities, the lockdowns and restrictions were never challenged.

In Conclusion …

In a nutshell, Project Massive Fear worked. 

All the key stakeholders “bought in.” Even if some people eventually realized some of the narratives may have been dubious or false, they’d already risked their reputations and careers by zealously pushing or endorsing these narratives … so they weren’t going to suddenly admit they might have been wrong.

In retrospect, how “they” made all the madness happen was surprisingly easy.

Republished from the author’s Substack