Thursday, January 12, 2023

The Warnings Are Everywhere; We Ignore Them at Our Peril


The study of human history reveals plenty of ideologies that have led to oppression, war, the rise of dictatorial regimes, the destruction of economies, and the deaths of millions of people. There were, of course, those who tried to warn the public. They were ignored, silenced, or even eliminated.

That same pattern is playing out in the United States and other western nations. The warning signs of looming disaster are evident across our most significant cultural institutions, and they are being widely ignored. 

These warnings fall into four basic categories.

The first is deception: The powerful tell lies of increasing severity with no compunction and no consequences.

COVID-19 is a textbook example. 

The "wet market" theory of the virus's origin never made sense, and those who were most insistent upon it were preventing inquiry into alternative theories. Those caught dissembling about the virus's origins (and the U.S.' funding of the dangerous "gain of function" research in China) were equally adamant that inexpensive and readily available drugs to treat COVID-19 symptoms were suddenly ineffective and dangerous, despite physicians' experience to the contrary.

The experimental mRNA "vaccines," however, were "safe and effective." We were told to ignore the increasing numbers of vaccinated people contracting and transmitting the virus; those (especially the young, healthy, athletic) developing serious health problems including myocarditis and pericarditis; people collapsing and dying "suddenly" from heart attacks and strokes; the long, fibroid "clots" being pulled from corpses. Anyone pointing out those facts, the defective VAERS reports, or the drug companies' insistence upon keeping all vaccine data sealed for 75 years were called "kooks" and "conspiracy theorists."

Other "official" stories have been proven to be egregious lies with expensive and damaging consequences: the story of Trump's "collusion" with Russia to win the 2016 election was a complete fabrication; the damning information on Hunter Biden's laptop was not Russian "disinformation" (and the FBI knew it all along); the southern border is not "secure."

The deception goes hand-in-hand with censorship. The recently released internal Twitter documents prove that the FBI and the intelligence community have been actively involved in censorship of truthful information and selective release of pre-approved dis-information by Twitter and the other social media companies (Google, YouTube, Facebook).

The second warning sign is corruption within law enforcement and the legal system.

America's major cities are eliminating bail and putting criminals back on the streets. Theft goes unpunished and innocent business owners are expected to absorb the losses.

Inconsistent legal standards depend upon political viewpoints. While most of the country was under pandemic lockdowns, Antifa and Black Live Matter activists were permitted massive protests, even when those turned into violent mobs that did billions of dollars in damage and destruction. 

Former President Donald Trump had his Florida home raided because of allegedly confidential documents in his possession. But when it was discovered that President Joe Biden was in possession of confidential documents from his time as vice president, no armed FBI SWAT team went rummaging through Jill Biden's lingerie drawers.

Innocent citizens are threatened. In Loudon County, Virginia (and elsewhere), incensed parents showed up at school board meetings to complain about policies and curricula that threaten their children's well-being. U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland published a threatening letter whose message was clear: If you object to the sexualization of your children and undermining of your values, we will treat you as "domestic terrorists.

The imprisonment of Jan. 6 protesters in a Washington, D.C. jail, deprived of their constitutional and basic human rights sends an equally clear message: Leftists can riot, loot, and burn, but if you protest what you believe to be systemic corruption, we will treat you as "domestic terrorists" and "insurrectionists." 

Kyle Rittenhouse was attacked trying to protect local businesses during the 2020 riots in Kenosha, Wisconsin. He shot his attackers. The media's lies and his prosecution for murder send yet another threatening message: If the government won't protect you, and you attempt to protect yourselves, we will treat you as "white supremacists" and "murderers.

The third warning sign is control. In the name of "climate change," the powerful seek to control every aspect of our lives: our lightbulbs, toilets, washing machines, cars, and homes. They intend to ban gas stoves. A little item tucked into the recent "infrastructure" bill mandates "kill switches" in all new cars sold after 2026, which could enable third parties to shut down your vehicle. The "digital dollar" would give the government control over your bank accounts. Cellphones, "smart" appliances, and even public streetlights are engaged in constant surveillance, which further facilitates control.

The fourth warning is arrogance, the lynchpin of all destruction. 

It would be bad enough if the aspiring autocrats were omniscient. But they aren't. The same class of people seeking to rule the planet was completely gaga over fraudsters Bernie Madoff, Elizabeth Holmes, Adam Neumann, and (most recently) Sam Bankman-Fried. They ran with sexual predators Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein. They tend to pooh-pooh faith in God but worship "intellectuals" espousing failed philosophies, often with ruinous consequences. They are vain and foolish, too impressed with themselves and others like them. Even scientists and scholars -- who should know better -- have tried to marginalize research and data that debunk their theories about nutrition, treatments for Alzheimer's, gender dysphoria, and -- most of all -- "climate change."

The ultimate problem is human failure combined with too much power: The power to force flawed ideologies on others. The power to crush opposition and forbid alternatives. The power to spread lies. The power to silence and punish those trying to provide the public with the truth. 

There is only one way out of this mess, and it is to claw back power from the institutions that have acquired too much of it: government, corporations, academia, the media, and the entertainment industry.

The warning signs are there. We ignore them at our peril.



X22, And we Know, and more- Jan 12

 



Things that are making me laugh and shake my head today: NCIS LA's FB page posted that incredible message from Hetty today, and this a-hole that used to talk on my site's threads until my optimism was too much for her eternal depression/anger bubble is all over the thread sprouting junk like: 'That was a younger Hetty', 'That was a deep fake', 'Time to find her body already', 'No one recognized her voice because they don't care about her anymore', 'She's nothing but a trafficker who deserves to be dead and forgotten about for her crimes', 'She's not really a mystery, she's just a child trafficker'.

I'm not joking guys, These kind of comments actually exist on that thread! Like, how much do you have to hate someone to even think this kind of baloney?! This idiot is clearly not very smart. Because if she was, she'd know that Hetty is in no means any kind of trafficker, and that if that really was someone else's voice, it would be credited on IMDB, and I don't believe there's any credit on IMDB that says 'Distorted Hetty voice'! 

If you hate someone to the point where you 100% believe she's dead even when there's a voice recording sent to OPS that was clearly her voice, then you have not been watching the same show as everyone else, and you clearly have a very, very low IQ!! (Oh, I can just imagine the look on this loony's face when a brand new photo of Hetty eventually shows up somewhere. She'll probably go off saying 'THIS IS CLEARLY A FAKE!!! THAT ISN'T ACTUALLY HER!!!! SHE'S DEAD!!!!'. 🤣🤣🤣🤣). And the biggest proof of all that that really was her: The clues she gave them helped them solve their case. Only Hetty would give them clues to help them. BAM!! 💪

Here's tonight's news:



What Caused the Political Hysteria? ~ VDH

Karma, Nemesis, payback . . . and all that stuff.


The Left has gone mad over Donald J. Trump—past, present, and future. 

The current Democratic Party and NeverTrump “conservatives” assumed that Trump was and remains so obviously toxic that they do not have to define exactly what his evil entails. 

Accordingly, they believe that any means necessary are justified to stop him. And furthermore, these zealots, when out of power, insist such extraordinary measures should not be emulated and institutionalized by their opponents, much less ever boomeranged back upon their creators. 

In this context, the Republicans retaking control of  the House of Representatives once again raises the question whether they should reply in kind. 

Given the current investigation following the Mar-a-Lago raid, should there also be a mirror-image special prosecutor to examine President Biden’s lost stash of classified documents in his insecure office following his vice presidency? 

Can House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) ever be considered too inflammatory, given that his predecessor, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) tore up the president’s State of the Union address on national television? 

How many Democratic House members should be denied committee assignments to remind the Congress that Pelosi’s rejection of Republican nominees was a terrible precedent? 

How many congressional subpoenas with threats of criminal prosecution and performance-art arrests should be issued to Democratic politicos to stop the criminalization of political differences? 

In our current age, will all former president’s private homes, closets, and drawers now be subject to FBI raids to ensure that “classified” documents were not wrongly stored there? 

Are Joe Biden’s current homes also a logical target, given his sloppy handling of classified foreign policy papers—eerily reminiscent of an abandoned laptop belonging to son Hunter Biden and daughter Ashley Biden’s lost diary? 

Was it ever a good idea to impeach a first-term president the moment he lost his party’s majority in the House—but without any hope of a conviction in the Senate? Would such a similar impeachment send a warning to Biden to honor his oath of office and start enforcing U.S. immigration law? 

Does a phone call now an impeachment make, on the grounds that Trump mixed domestic politics with foreign policy? 

But was Trump’s Ukrainian call that much different from Barack Obama’s 2012 quid pro quo in Seoul, South Korea, where he asked the Russian president to convey a deal to Vladmir Putin: stay calm and give Obama space during his reelection bid while Obama in turn would be flexible on missile defense. 

Putin did just that and put off invading Ukraine until Obama was reelected. And Obama made sure there was no joint missile defense projects in Eastern Europe. Was that deal in America’s interest, or Obama’s own and thus similarly impeachable? 

Or consider Joe Biden mixing foreign policy and politics on the eve of the midterm elections. For example, he kept draining the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to dangerously low levels while begging hostile foreign dictators to pump more oil. 

Thereby Biden sought to win votes from angry commuters buffeted by high fuel prices. And he also appeased the Left by not ordering more drilling for gas and oil. Was that gambit in the nation’s—or Joe Biden’s—best interest? 

What is wrong with the House investigating whether the FBI infiltrated and contracted social media companies to warp news coverage and suppress free expression of American citizens? 

The Left certainly thought it was necessary in 1975 for the Church Committee to investigate the CIA. That committee found the agency was contracting new organizations to front for its covert operations, while partnering with telecommunications corporations to monitor the data of citizens on CIA watch lists. Sound familiar to today’s FBI? 

Was it a good idea for the Democratic House to release Trump’s tax returns? 

If the Republican House were to do the same with the Biden consortium’s tax records, would the result be far more incriminating? 

There was much talk once in Congress of evoking the 25th Amendment to remove a supposedly mentally impaired Trump. A Yale psychiatrist was even paraded before Congress to attest the president was dangerously unbalanced. Calls for aptitude testing resulted in Trump acing the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. 

Should the House now follow the Democrats’ precedent? Should medical professionals review all of Biden’s incoherent utterances, his fantasy biographic tales, and his often physical fragility and determine whether he is non compos mentis? Is that a precedent we wish to follow? 

When a defeated first-term president leaves office and vows to return in four years, is it wise to impeach and try him as a private citizen? 

Did not the House impeach Trump in part because he warned the Ukrainians that Joe Biden, a possible opponent in 2020, was likely corrupt? Do the endless Democratic efforts to go after Trump, a possible Biden opponent in 2024, constitute far more than a Trump single phone call to the president of Ukraine? 

Somehow supposedly worldly and sophisticated partisans in their self-righteousness ignored ancient laws of what goes around comes around, of Karma, of Nemesis, of payback’s a bit—h, and all that stuff.






7 Reasons High Inflation Isn’t Likely To Go Away Any Time Soon

The people who have created American misery are the same people in charge of solving it. That’s going to go well.



A recession is coming in 2023, concluded more than two-thirds of the economists at big financial institutions recently surveyed by The Wall Street Journal. Inflation is also likely to remain high. Measuring year-over-year inflation by the U.S. government’s 1980s methodology put it at 15.23 percent in November 2022 instead of the government’s claimed 7.11 percent, according to economist John Williams.

Many commentators, including me, were wrong when we previously claimed our grandkids will be paying off America’s massively unaffordable welfare state. We are all paying for it right now and are likely to be for much of our lives in inflation and other economic devastation.

Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman’s maxim that “inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon” — meaning, inflation is always caused by government overspending — predicts continued inflation for at least the next five years, if not longer.

That’s because government entities are continuing to engage in seriously inflationary actions. They’re doing this partly because of ideology, partly to buy votes, and partly because they prefer eating away Americans’ savings to paying off the unprecedented government debt that politicians have accumulated in the last 70 years enriching their friends and buying off voters.

Inflation is Them Stealing from You

A 2021 Politico profile of a former U.S. Federal Reserve member noted, “Between 2008 and 2014, the Federal Reserve printed more than $3.5 trillion in new bills. To put that in perspective, it’s roughly triple the amount of money that the Fed created in its first 95 years of existence. Three centuries’ worth of growth in the money supply was crammed into a few short years.”

That dissenting former Federal Reserve committee member, Thomas Hoenig, “was worried primarily that the Fed was taking a risky path that would deepen income inequality, stoke dangerous asset bubbles and enrich the biggest banks over everyone else,” the profile says. “He also warned that it would suck the Fed into a money-printing quagmire that the central bank would not be able to escape without destabilizing the entire financial system.”

Essentially, the Federal Reserve has been helping Congress manufacture money to buy up the public debt they contracted by promising Americans more stuff than we can pay for. That’s been ongoing since the 1960s Great Society, which basically paid Americans with unaffordable entitlements to shut up about the steady loss of their constitutional freedoms, according to scholar Christopher Caldwell.

The Borrowing Will Go On Until It Can’t

In 2021, 41 percent of federal spending depended on borrowing. In 2022, 22 percent did. This means raising the cost of debt by hiking interest rates, as the Fed is now doing, could provoke a crisis because it would make Congress’s unsustainable behavior even more painful.

As a Manhattan Institute analysis by economist Brian Riedl notes, “rising interest rates risk pushing government interest costs, annual budget deficits, and total government debt to unsustainable levels … once the debt surges, even modest interest-rate movements can impose stratospheric costs.”

This would call years of government bluffing about the state of federal finances and institutions. It would require Congress not only to stop spending but to cut programs, which means angering voters. It would usher in the unavoidable and painful new era of managing America’s decline.

“Once a debt-and-interest-rate spiral begins, it is nearly impossible to escape without drastic inflation or fiscal consolidation,” Riedl notes.

However this ends, it is likely to include a lot of economic pain, one way or another. Here are just a few of the many indicators that inflationary times are not going away fast.

1. ‘Covid’ Spending Until at Least 2024

The funds for the sixth waste-packed “Covid relief bill” will be distributed to big-government donors, states, and local governments through the end of presidential election year 2024. Yes, the American Rescue Plan Act from Covid-tide sends states and local governments $350 billion that is still being rolled out — by design.

That law’s total spending comprises more than 100 times states’ 2020 budget shortfalls, and many state and local governments can hardly figure out what to do with all the money. As they take years to spend it, that money will keep juicing inflationary pressure. A similar effect is occurring with all the so-called Covid relief bills, which together sent $6 trillion spinning through the economy, devaluing our currency. Much of this wild inflationary deficit spending has been electronically printed through the Federal Reserve.

Together, 2020s federal spending allegedly in response to Covid was more than double the inflation-adjusted federal response to the 1930s Great Depression. We’re already seeing the inflationary effects of all this so-called Covid spending, and it’s not over yet.

2. UniParty Recently Went on Even More Inflationary Spending Binges

In conjunction with Democrats’ mega-spending “infrastructure” and “green energy” bills soon after Covid that also helped them win Congress and the presidency in 2020, all this extra spending is projected to increase the federal debt by an unprecedented $6.5 trillion, costing more than the 20 years of U.S. occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, according to Riedl.

“In other words, the U.S. government is in the early stages of what is projected to be the largest government debt binge in world history,” Riedl notes.

That doesn’t even include the massive federal spending expansions to support a large army of grifters profiting off the human suffering of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022. Congress spent more on the first four months of Ukraine’s war than it did on the first five years of its undeclared war in Afghanistan.

Atop all this, more deficit spending is likely to come. In August 2022, Democrats confirmed yet again that historic levels of inflation that year were no impediment to their big-spending aims when Biden announced that he’d force taxpayers to assume up to nearly $1 trillion in student loans taken on by largely higher-income professionals. That spending is tied up in court and could be allowed at any time.

This all means that the source of inflation — government overspending — is at an unprecedented rate and pace, and even with the House Freedom Caucus’ negotiated limits on congressional spending activity, trillions in new spending is already locked in.

3. Build Back Bankrupt Shoveled Yet More Out the Door for Years to Come

In 2022, the Biden administration managed to get its top-priority grab-bag of increased government spending signed into law. By spending more money the government does not have and imposing more taxes, the ridiculously named Inflation Reduction Act is likely to increase inflation, said a Tax Foundation analysis.

“By increasing spending, the bill worsens inflation, especially in the first four years, as revenue raisers take time to ramp up and the deficit increases,” the foundation’s analysis says. “We find that budget deficits would increase from 2023 to 2026, potentially worsening inflation.”

Continuing to shovel money to cronies while ignoring major structural problems in the U.S. economy and federal budget process has become a hallmark of Congress in the 2000s. This has to end at some point, but until that point comes reasonable people can only expect such legislation to continue to pass, and to continue to worsen inflationary pressures.

Given how reckless both parties have been for decades on fiscal matters, it is likely this norm of spending money Congress can’t actually appropriate will continue until a major disaster ends their ability to fake.

4. FedGov Destroying the People’s Trust

Inflation happens “When money is no longer a trustworthy measure of value,” note Steve Forbes, Nathan Lewis, and Elizabeth Ames in their 2022 book, “Inflation.” Inflation is at least partly about a crisis of confidence in government — a warranted one, usually, because major inflation occurs as a result of politician malfeasance. Unfortunately, U.S. government officials are doing nothing to restore the people’s lost confidence in them — in fact, just the opposite.

In 2022, federal officials spent months denying inflation was happening. They also denied the United States was in a recession, insisting the traditional definition of two economic quarters in contraction was false when it was applied under Democrat rule. They’ve switched how they measure inflation to hide a large part of it.

U.S. leaders also refuse to stabilize our currency, instead taking actions that further erode Americans’ ability to put food on the table and get ahead through legitimately productive honest labor (as opposed to bullsh-t jobs). This does the opposite of what is needed: restore confidence in our markets by announcing strong steps to strengthen the U.S. dollar. They are also engaging in other activities that only erode confidence in the U.S. financial system, such as monetizing the federal debt and refusing to stop massive deficit spending.

Because politicians have created this situation and keep refusing to actually address it, Americans increasingly don’t trust their government or our debt-driven financial system. Polling shows public trust repeatedly hitting new record lows for every social and political institution. That’s an economic problem as well as a political and cultural problem, because a lack of confidence in markets can trigger economic growth, recession, and panics.

Usually, such crises build under the surface for a long time and then burst out into the open all of a sudden. As Hoover Institution economist John Cochrane said during a panel discussion, “Debt crises are like the Spanish Inquisition; no one expects them to come. If you knew they were coming, they would have already happened.”

5. FedGov Is Effectively Bankrupt and Inflation Helps It Hide That

The on-books U.S. national debt of $31.5 trillion is just the tip of the iceberg. Our entitlement systems are about to start going bankrupt, adding trillions in additional financial burdens on taxpayers. Riedl notes, “The U.S. government is projected to run a staggering $112 trillion in budget deficits over the next three decades, driven mostly by Social Security and Medicare commitments that are already set in law.” 

If one adds unfunded and other liabilities that government officials keep off the books such as Federal Reserve debt, the amount the U.S. national government owes is more than $200 trillion. That doesn’t include what state and local governments owe, and many of them are also bankrupt or getting there.

“No matter what interest rate you use, the U.S. needs to immediately and permanently raise every federal tax by at least one third to pay, through time, for what our government plans to spend,” Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff wrote with fellow economist John Goodman in 2021. “The alternative? Massive spending cuts. And, no, the Federal Reserve can’t make this problem go away by printing the money needed by the Treasury. This would end where it always does — in hyperinflation.”

U.S. debt, deficits, and unfunded liabilities — which together form a total picture of U.S. national economic entrapment — are the largest ever measured in world history. Besides Japan, which isn’t spending the majority of its debt on entitlements like the United States is, “Greece and Italy are the only other OECD countries with a total government debt exceeding that of the United States,” Riedl notes. Greece and Italy have had major sovereign debt crises that have destroyed their standards of living and brought their economies into long-term decline.

“When you look at these numbers, you realize we’re Argentina in 1910,” Kotlikoff told CNBC in 2018, before the alarmist Covid response and Biden presidency made things much worse. All it will take for these scary structural problems to become visible and impossible to ignore is a financial panic or another major event like a war. Oh, look, Congress is also pushing us ever-toward open war with Russia instead of toward peace. Brilliant.

6. Child Scarcity Will Drive Higher Prices

In March 2022, The Wall Street Journal reported the opinion of retired British central banker Charles Goodhart that global structural factors will drive higher inflation for years to come. Goodhart helped Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher break inflation in the 1980s. He told the Journal that the rising global crisis of child scarcity will also push inflation up for decades.

As labor becomes more scarce, he maintained, workers will push for higher wages, in turn driving up prices. At the same time, businesses will manufacture and invest more locally to help offset both labor shortages and the nationalist and geopolitical pressures curbing globalized supply chains. That will increase production costs and local workers’ bargaining power. Global savings will fall as older people consume more than they produce, spending particularly on healthcare. All that will push up interest rates, he predicted.

A meeting of global central bankers in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, in August 2022 for the first time since 2019 found the bankers publicly reflecting a similar assessment, the Journal reported. “I don’t think that we are going to go back to that environment of low inflation,” European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said on a panel.

7. Those Who Did This Are Still in Charge

This reality applies to nearly every major political problem: The same people who have created these messes are the same people who largely retain the power to respond to them. The same people writing massive spending bills that divert our economy away from productive labor and into rent-seekers’ pockets are still largely in charge of government spending.

There might have been a slight shift of power in the House, but there hasn’t in the Senate, nor in the presidency. The same guy who claims the power to “pen and phone” a trillion dollars in student loan bailouts is in office, and all his K Street and Wall Street buddies still have gleefully effective access. You can be sure this cabal of crooks isn’t going to be looking out for your best interests now that we’re about to have a potentially dangerous recession.

That may be the most significant systemic reason to expect our markets to be heading for an even rougher ride in 2023 than we’ve had from 2020 to 2022.



The Conservatives’ Game of Chicken Pays Off, We Hope


With the advantage of a week of hindsight, the resolution of the Speaker fight was always pretty clear. The Speaker, for a variety of reasons, needed to be Kevin McCarthy, and he needed to agree to rules and other arrangements that ensured that the house would no longer be the ironfisted, establishment-friendly Speaktatorship of Boehner, Ryan, and Pelosi. McCarthy had to compromise, and the Rebels had to accept a compromise, and the standoff had to end. And it did. And the new rules were passed. Ever the optimist, in retrospect we Republicans may be off to strong start.

Or the GOP could blow it. As Wesley Snipes famously said in “Passenger 57,” “Always bet on Republicans to screw up.

Or black. Whatever.

In any case, I am just a little surprised they managed to pull off a deal in five days. It could have dragged on and on and ended up with some pinko installed by Dems and collaborators. I am glad about the outcome. I do not trust McCarthy – or anyone else who would want that miserable job (though Paul Ryan claimed not to want it and it is hard to imagine someone else sucking worse than him) – and therefore I want McCarthy neutered by the conservatives. Now we can go forward to a future of owning the libs, and hopefully not as before when they owned us.

Let’s assign kudos and criticism.

This was all McCarthy’s fault – but you will be confused further on as I critique the Rebels so let me explain the legal concept of joint and several liability. Basically, in some cases, the law provides that a variety of people can all be equally to blame, here for whatever negative results (if any) came from the short public phase of the fight. 

McCarthy wanted the job, and it was on him to earn it. He did get it eventually, so he won. He was the only one who really ever could win enough votes – no one else who could have possibly won and not turned our conservative stomachs would have taken it. It’s a terrible job. You have to be one like of those weirdos who put aside girls and beer to try to be student body president. McCarthy is. This was his dream, which I was perfectly content to see his dream die if it became necessary. He wanted to be the guy on the phone 18 hours a day trying to wring a few bucks out of donors. He is undeniably good at that. And he wanted it. More power to him. Well, less power, actually.

Anyway, as January 3rd approached, McCarthy had not yet wrapped up the vote. There were only two dozen Rebels, but there were enough. While he increased the GOP House caucus in 2020 and 2022 (meeting the minimal threshold for his leadership position of having won elections, something RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel has failed to do in five election – learn how to retire her at www.HireHarmeet.com), McCarthy did not increase his caucus enough to dictate the terms of his accession. That’s on him. Coffee is for closers, and so is not having to grovel before the off-putting likes of Matt Gaetz.

Next time win more seats. In any case, McCarthy eventually caved, and that’s good. I wanted him emasculated because if he was not gelded, we would see more last-minute Omnibuses and secret deals and never get back to anything like regular order.

He also blew it by not getting this dispute resolved back in November. This schism was always real, but it seemed like he was in denial and felt the Rebels would roll over when they actually had to vote. If McCarthy wanted to avoid a floor fight – because it was not clear the Rebels did – he needed to figure out how to avoid it. If that meant giving in earlier, so be it. Again, McCarthy wanted the job and to the extent he only got it after some brutal public sausage-making, that was on him.

McCarthy’s allies were not always helpful. Mike Rogers probably should have controlled himself and not created the evocative but unrepresentative photo of that other guy grabbing him. And people needed not to throw gas on the fire. Dan Crenshaw was a great SEAL, but his SEALness does not always translate well to what he needs to do in Congress. Calling terrorists” terrorists” and shooting them – good. Calling other Republicans “terrorists” on the shows – not good. His emotions got involved, spinning up their emotions. Take it from somebody who negotiates for a living – ticking people off is a tool, but not your only one and it is frankly rarely the one to use when trying to get a deal. Crenshaw is already on the wrong side of many conservatives; he has a safe district, but Senate? I think many Lone Star conservatives would prefer John Cornyn to him and that tube supported gun control. Chill, Dan.

Now the Rebels. I like some of them and I supported their demands. The issue was, to some extent, their acting ability. Negotiation is acting. You strike a pose and maybe you will move, but maybe you won’t. With some of the Rebels it was hard to tell. They had to say no, nope, never, but the question was whether that was for real or an act to get concessions. Frankly, some of the Rebels made it seem so personal that it was unclear that any concessions could work. Part of the panic was that people believed that they would never, ever vote for McCarthy, or at least not against him. They acted too well. The smirkiness did not help. That went far to make what was a necessary and proper debate into something that looks like chaotic Calvinball. 

The Rebels should have produced a public list of their requirements to get McCarthy elected, in writing with their signatures, so it was all there, in the open, and there was no question of them trying to wheedle personal goodies out of the Speaker-in-waiting. They needed to make sure that the regime media could not blue-wash a substantive rules debate into a personal spat, or at least minimize that predictable narrative. Otherwise, without an unequivocal list of asks, we were supposed to simply trust them. I don’t trust anybody. To the extent they looked like they were out for attention, that’s on them.

The Rebels were a mixed lot. There was a mix of showboatery, smirking, and seriousness. Chip Roy is a sober and smart legislator who had a majority of the Rebels willing to get to “Yes” if McCarthy met his demands. And McCarthy did. Roy made it happen. We owe him.

I hear good things about Bob Good. I get that he hates McCarthy personally. He came around for the good of the caucus when he got the right compromises. Scott Perry is a former general and fellow Army War College grad, so I immediately assumed the worst, but he came around too when he got what he needed. 

Matt Rosendale came off like a crank and a jerk, especially when he did the “Kevin- psyche!” thing during one roll call. Not cool, and not funny. The Montana Senate primary will be lit enough without him in it.

One person who deserves respect is Lauren Boebert. She’s a serious legislator who cares not just about the big stuff that gets TV hits but the minutiae that matters to getting conservative policies enacted. She did not win big and her district is definitely not safe, but she fought at great personal risk that the other Rebels in safe seats did not face. And when she got her deal, she took it though it is clear she is no McCarthy fan.

Finally, let’s talk about Matt Gaetz. First, his shameful treatment by the FBI and DOJ was a major disgrace that was fully in line with their total abdication of any trust or credibility. No one deserved what he has endured with remarkable poise and good humor. Second, some more real talk. Most people find him slightly creepy. I care about politicians only to the extent they are useful, so his vibe matters to me only to that extent. But he does give normal the shivers for whatever reason and that makes him hurt our brand when he is the face of things. That did not help here.

This fight had to happen. We cannot have another business-as-usual GOP House. The establishment did not win big enough to do it without the conservatives, and the conservatives got their price. It was not clear they would ever get to “Yes,” but they did. Did the fight – which was always going to be played by the regime media as chaos – have to happen this way? No, McCarthy could have had it out of sight months ago. He did not, and the Rebels did not back down. Did it go on too long? I thought it was headed that way, and I was frankly unsure whether it was going to end before a bunch of moderates got with Hakeem Jeffries and sold us out to elect some “compromise unity” GOP Speaker who would essentially be Hakeem Jeffries in a Republican skinsuit. You rarely go wrong overestimating the stupidity of the Republican Party.

This whole “THE GOP CANNOT EVEN ELECT A SPEAKER” thing will fade, to be followed by “THE GOP IS UNABLE TO GOVERN” thing that will follow when conservatives flex their new-found muscles. There are going to be more fights, and while we should not engage in dumb ones, some fights are necessary.

Was this one? Yes, maybe not exactly as it went down, but in the end, we got the right Speaker and the right rules. I was not sure we would. So, it’s a good beginning. I hope.



Swalwell Gets Busted About Why He's Being Kicked off Intel Committee

Swalwell Gets Busted About Why He's Being Kicked off Intel Committee

Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

We reported on the fireworks when Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) went on Joy Reid’s show. Among the things that they spoke about was that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has committed to kicking three of the Democrats off their committees: Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) off the Intel Committee, and Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) off of the Foreign Affairs Committee.

But Swalwell tried to sell Americans on why he was being kicked off. He claimed that Donalds admitted to Reid that he was being kicked off “purely out of vengeance.”

Now, that was a complete lie, as the transcript showed. Donalds wasn’t the one talking about “vengeance,” that was Reid’s ridiculous spin.

What Donalds did say was that if Democrats want to change the rules [about refusing people for committees], they would “live by your rules.”

Former House Speaker changed the rules when she refused to put the appointees that Republicans proposed onto the Jan. 6 Committee, she also “changed the rules” by booting people off committees like Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA). Joy Reid was quiet about the “vengeance” there when that was all about trying to make the Committee as “anti-Trump” as it could possibly be to go after him.

Not only didn’t Donalds talk about vengeance, but he also didn’t say it was “purely” because of the way Democrats had changed things. As McCarthy pointed out, there were very good reasons to boot Swalwell, because he couldn’t even get a security clearance [because of his prior relationship with a Chinese spy] so he wasn’t going to leave him on such an important committee.

But that says something about Swalwell right there: Either he isn’t able to discern what he heard on the Reid show or he’s lying to the public. Either way that makes him a poor candidate for the Intel Committee, on top of the problem of not being able to figure out a Chinese spy.

Swalwell got a talking to by a large part of the internet, when he tried to sell them with the “reason” for his booting. No one was buying what he was trying to sell and he got ratioed into next week.

Dave Rubin posted the interview that he did with Kevin McCarthy and McCarthy went to town on Swalwell out of the gate.