Monday, July 31, 2023

Wagner mercenaries in Belarus move closer to the Polish border, Poland’s prime minister says


WARSAW, Poland — Over 100 mercenaries belonging to the Russian-linked Wagner group in Belarus have moved close to the border with Poland, the Polish prime minister said Saturday.

Mateusz Morawiecki said at a news conference that the mercenaries had moved close to the Suwalki Gap, a strategic stretch of Polish territory situated between Belarus and Kaliningrad, a Russian territory separated from the mainland.

Poland is a member of both the European Union and NATO, and it has worried about its security with Russian ally Belarus and Ukraine on its eastern border.



Those fears have grown since Wagner group mercenaries arrived in Belarus since the group’s short-lived rebellion earlier this summer.

The Poland-Belarus border has already been a tense place for a couple of years, ever since large numbers of immigrants from the Middle East and Africa began arriving, seeking to enter the EU by crossing into Poland, as well as Lithuania.

Poland‘s government accuses Russia and Belarus of using the migrants to destabilize Poland and other EU countries. It calls the migration a form of hybrid warfare, and has responded by building a high wall along part of its border with Belarus.

“Now the situation becomes even more dangerous,” Morawiecki told reporters.

He added that “this is certainly a step towards a further hybrid attack on Polish territory.”

Morawiecki spoke during a visit to an arms factory in Gliwice, in southern Poland, where Leopard tanks used by the Ukrainian army are being repaired.



#Winning: Sound of Freedom to hit theaters in 20 countries. 🎉

 


Source: https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2023/07/31/sound-of-freedom-going-global-to-hit-theaters-in-over-20-countries-after-nearly-150-million-at-domestic-box-office/

The anti-trafficking drama Sound of Freedom will be hitting theaters worldwide in over 20 countries next month, after raking in nearly $150 million at the domestic box office.

“You ask, we answer. ‘Sound of Freedom’ is on its way around the world,” the production company Angel Studios announced on Wednesday.

Sound of Freedom will open first in South Africa on August 18, then in Australia and New Zealand on August 24.

On August 31, the film will hit theaters in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Belize, Panama, Columbia, Venezuela, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia, Chile, Peru, Ecuador, and Costa Rica.

Then, on September 1, Sound of Freedom will be shown in the United Kingdom and Ireland, and then in Spain on October 11.

The movie has been a great success, blowing away expectations with a nearly $20 million opening, despite the mainstream media attacking the film, as well as its viewers.

As Breitbart News reported last week, after three weekends in release, Sound of Freedom out-grossed Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One‘s second weekend in release. And what’s even more incredible is the fact the film has accomplished this in more than a thousand fewer theaters.

“The people are tired of just being entertained,” anti-human trafficking activist and author Tim Ballard said. “They want to have purpose to what they’re looking at — and this has purpose.”

Watch Below:

The film’s lead actor, Jim Caviezel, responded to backlash from the mainstream media, saying journalists fear Sound of Freedom‘s success and message.

“They’re scared. Quaking in their boots. And it’s because the public are listening to their hearts, which is what this film tells you to do,” Caviezel said.

Sound of Freedom is based on a true story about Ballard’s efforts to rescue a child victim of sex-traffickers.

The film shows how Ballard, without the sanction or support of the U.S. government, inserts himself as a “client” into the world of modern child-slavery, locates the young girl, and liberates her and her fellow prisoners from a Colombian “pleasure island.”

Watch the film’s trailer below:


X22, And we Know, and more- July 31

 




Enough With Half Measures, Throw All U.S. Code at Trump

Are we sure that Trump, well known as a New York real estate developer, has strictly abided by all the provisions of the law?


I have a suggestion for Jack Smith, one of Joe Biden’s official Rottweilers in charge of taking out Donald Trump. Throw the book at him. I mean the whole book.

So far, Smith has taken a sort of piecemeal approach to suffocating the former president. His opening gambit was a 37-count felony indictment over Trump’s possession and handling of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach. A couple of days ago, he added three more counts and yet another defendant, Trump employee Carlos De Oliveira, to the list.

But I say: enough with half measures. The obscenely bloated, contradictory, and embarrassing compendium of the laws that supposedly govern this country is known as the U.S. Code. Among other things, it is a monument to the malevolent frivolousness of the people we elect to govern us. The Greek lawgiver Solon believed that a good society should have few laws but that those laws ought to be strictly and impartially enforced.

Our anti-Solons believe in the indiscriminate, rabbit-like multiplication of laws, the more the merrier, in order to increase the potential for obfuscation and partisan deployment. Currently, the U.S. Code contains thousands upon thousands of laws regarding everything from agriculture and the armed forces to telecommunications, space programs, and voting.

Who knows how many of the provisions contained in that Leviathan’s Bible Trump may have violated? For example, chapter 15 of Title 48 (“Territories and Insular Possessions”) concerns “Conveyance Of Submerged Lands To Territories.” Section §1707 of that chapter has this to say about “Payment of rents, royalties, and fees to local government”:

“On and after the date of enactment of this Act, all rents, royalties, or fees from leases, permits, or use rights, issued prior to such date of enactment by the United States with respect to the land conveyed by this Act, or by the amendment made by this Act, and rights of action for damages for trespass occupancies of such lands shall accrue and belong to the appropriate local government under whose jurisdiction the land is located.”

Are we sure that Donald Trump, well known as a New York real estate developer, has strictly abided by all the provisions of the law? Has he snagged any rents, royalties, or fees from any lands covered by this act? If so, has he handed the pelf over to the “appropriate local government under whose jurisdiction the land is located?” How do you know?

In this country, it is a hallowed principle that a person is innocent until indicted. You hear people say that all the time. They say it in jest, or half in jest. But they know that it is true. But they overcome the resulting cognitive dissonance by pretending that it is only half true, that really, “deep down,” we are still a “nation of laws, not men” and that the FBI, for example, actually acts in the service of the public, not as the semi-secret police force of the Democratic party. If they’re on TV they say it with a straight face.

Among the most amusing video clips I have seen recently was Jack Smith’s first announcement of his indictment of Trump. “We have one set of laws in this country,” Smith said, face straight as a meter stick, “and they apply to everyone.” I’m not sure when I have laughed so hard.

Hunter Biden was unavailable for comment. So was his dear old Dad, “the Big Guy.” So, for that matter, was Sam Bankman-Fried, swindler and mega donor to the Democrats, who just saw a campaign finance violation against him dropped because, like Hunter, he is a member of a protected class. Did I mention that Bankman-Fried was the number 2 top donor (after George Soros) to the Dems, having contributed some $70 million to its coffers over 18 months?

Anyway, I have two suggestions for Jack Smith. One is to broaden his indictment against Trump to include all the provisions contained in the U.S. Code. Again: this is no time for half measures. If we are really going to achieve full banana republic status before the next election, it is essential that the chief political rival of the Democrats be publicly reviled and jailed. Trump is sure to have violated some provisions of the U.S. Code. As Harvey Silverglate pointed out in his book Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent, we all have. Let’s mobilize more lawyers to comb through those thousands of pages and cook up some original indictments.

My second suggestion may seem more modest, but connoisseurs of weaponizing the law for partisan ends will understand that it is a robust insurance policy, if I may employ a phrase made famous by disgraced FBI love bird Peter Strzok. Comprehensive though the U.S. Code is, with its 54 Titles, and thousands of individual clauses, there is at present no single clause dealing specifically with Donald Trump. That is an important oversight that needs to be corrected.

Some Roman emperors practiced what came to be called “damnatio memoriae,” erasing from the public record all trace of people they disliked (Augustus did it with Mark Antony, for example, Caracalla did it with his brother Geta). But that was an ex-post facto expedient. How much more effective to deal in advance with someone who poses such a serious threat to the Regime as Donald Trump does. Edward I gloried in the nickname “Malleus Scotorum,” “Hammer of the Scots.” Jack Smith ought to take a page from Eddie’s book and put it about that he is “Malleus Donaldi,” “Hammer of the Donald.” With a little effort he ought to be able to convince the powers that be to add a few pages to the U.S. Code specifically proscribing Donald Trump. The future of Our Democracy™ (not to mention Our Rule of Law™) demands it.



Xi Jinping’s ‘Disappearing’ Acts Leave No Doubt He’s A Dictator

The mysterious ’disappearance’ of China’s top diplomat is the latest proof that Xi is a ruthless dictator.  



After President Joe Biden called Xi Jinping, the head of the Chinese Communist Party, a “dictator” at a fundraising event last month, Beijing vehemently protested, accusing Biden’s remarks of being “extremely absurd,” “irresponsible,” and “an open political provocation.”

The mysterious “disappearance” of China’s top diplomat Qin Gang and his eventual removal, however, is the latest proof that Xi is a ruthless dictator.  

Qin Gang was a rising star within the CCP. He was a spokesman for China’s Foreign Ministry from 2005 to 2010 and served as China’s ambassador to the United States between 2021 and 2022. He was one of China’s most vocal “wolf diplomats.” He was combative and antagonistic and willing to break diplomatic protocols and damage relationships to promote Beijing’s agenda and narratives. In one of his interviews with NPR, then-Ambassador Qin denied that the Chinese government’s treatment of Uyghur Muslims amounted to genocide.  

Xi promoted Qin to minister of China’s Foreign Affairs Ministry seven months ago. Then this March, Qin was elevated to state councilor and joined the Communist Party’s Central Committee.Many suspected that Qin’s rapid promotion was a sign that he had the full backing of Xi and that Xi might be grooming Qin to be his successor.  

Before Secretary of State Antony Blinken began his trip to China, Qin blamed the U.S. for the two nations’ worsening relationship and told Blinken to “stop interfering in China’s internal affairs.” One of Qin’s employees, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman, warned, “The U.S. should not have the illusion of dealing with China from a position of strength.” 

Five days after Biden called Xi a “dictator,” Qin mysteriously “disappeared” from the public eye, and all his scheduled diplomatic meetings and trips have been canceled since June 26. After being bombarded with questions about Qin’s whereabouts from foreign media, one of China’s Foreign Ministry spokesmen mentioned that Qin experienced “health issues” without elaborating on any details. Since then, the Chinese government has not answered any questions regarding Qin. 

The Chinese government’s unwillingness to offer a credible explanation for the disappearance of its highest-ranked diplomat only fueled domestic and international rumor mills. An increasingly likely speculation promoted by longtime China watcher Bill Bishop and others is that Qin had an extramarital affair with a well-known female TV anchor, Fu Xiaotian, who is likely in the U.S. with the couple’s love child. 

Qin’s political rivals probably laid bare the alleged affair to cast doubts on his loyalty to the party, especially to Xi. If this were the case, then Qin would be under house arrest or already in jail while an internal investigation occurs. We can be sure only one man is responsible for Qin’s disappearance: Xi himself. 

Almost a month after Qin’s disappearance, the Chinese government announced this week that Qin was removed from his foreign minister position and that his former boss, Wang Yi, who was elevated to the powerful Politburo, the CCP’s decision-making body, would take over Qin’s title and responsibility. Sharp-eyed observers soon noticed that information related to Qin has been erased from the Foreign Ministry’s website. Twitter users jokingly referred to Qin Gang as “Qin Gone.” 

Imagine if Blinken vanished for several weeks and the White House offered no explanation. Then suddenly, Biden appointed Susan Rice, a former U.S. ambassador to the U.N., to replace Blinken. The State Department’s website erased all photos and mentions of Blinken as if he were never there. That’s why Qin’s mysterious disappearance and subsequent removal have sent shockwaves through the international diplomatic community. 

The CCP is known for secrecy and lack of transparency, especially in its decision-making process and personnel choices. Since its inception, the party has had a history of fierce power struggles. Losers, often along with their families, are usually eliminated in the most horrible ways.  

Chairman Mao Zedong perfected this internal power struggle. He never hesitated to forcefully remove his lieutenants, including his hand-picked successors, when he felt someone got too close to his power center, or that he needed to make an example out of somebody to warn others. Several of his top generals were tortured to death during the Cultural Revolution. Mao’s heir-apparent, Lin Biao, and several of his family members were killed in a mysterious plane crash in 1972. 

Xi is the most authoritarian leader China has had since Mao. Xi modeled his dictatorial rule after Mao’s: He adopted the Maoist cult of personality, having his books and portraits displayed beside Mao’s. Xi purged his rivals and became the chairman of everything through the so-called anti-corruption campaign. In 2017, Xi abolished the presidential term limit established by his predecessor, Deng Xiaoping, and became China’s dictator for life. 

Xi is especially fond of “disappearing” people, from well-known business tycoons to actresses, sports stars, human rights activists, religious believers, and government officials. Businessman Jack Ma, the founder of China’s most successful e-commerce company Alibaba, was allowed to “reappear” after he gave up control of his company. But former Interpol President Meng Hongwei was sentenced to more than a decade in prison after vanishing on a trip to China.

Through the “disappearing” and controlled “reappearing” of prominent figures and dissidents, Xi makes it clear he alone is in charge and will mercilessly eliminate any real or imagined threat.  Everyone else is expendable, including the dictator’s once-closest lieutenants. Xi probably hasn’t realized (or maybe he doesn’t care) how much the secrecy and abruptness of Qin’s removal have damaged China’s international reputation and Chinese officials’ credibility.  

One China watcher told the South China Morning Post: “If a vice-national-level leader can just disappear without much of an explanation, people find it difficult to trust and count on any Chinese leader or official and their positions. … [The incident] casts much uncertainty and confusion over the consistency, stability, and credibility of Beijing’s decision-making.”

The Qin saga will likely further erode investors’ confidence in China when China desperately needs foreign investment to rescue its faltering economy and stubbornly high youth unemployment rate

The lesson for the Biden administration is that it must stop treating Xi as if he were a regular head of state. Biden was right to call Xi a dictator. When Biden administration officials visit China, they should stop bowing to Xi and his underlings and begging for cooperation on issues that matter little to Xi, such as climate change and the control of fentanyl exports.

A dictator who is cruel to his own people doesn’t care about our people’s well-being. He will not hesitate to harm America and our allies’ interests. The sooner the Biden administration recognizes the true nature of Xi and his regime and develops appropriate policy responses, the better we can protect ourselves and our allies.   



Merrick Garland Must Appoint a Special Counsel in Hunter Biden Probe, or Congress Should Impeach Him


Jeff Charles reporting for RedState 

Will the public ever learn more about the myriad of scandals surrounding the Biden family? A number of whistleblowers from various agencies have come forward spilling the tea on President Joe Biden, his son Hunter, and officials working in the government, and it seems that daily there are new stories about what’s contained on Hunter’s laptop from Hell. Democrats claim that that’s all been investigated, but it’s quite apparent that it hasn’t.

One of the whistleblowers, IRS criminal investigator Joseph Ziegler, recently testified before Congress and detailed how elements in the agency scuttled an investigation into Hunter. He alleged that these individuals concealed potential malfeasance to protect the younger Biden from legal troubles.

Ziegler published an op-ed in the WSJ Thursday, in which he made the argument that the Justice Department should appoint a Special Counsel to investigate Hunter and look into allegations that federal agencies tried to protect him:

Hunter Biden’s plea deal on gun and tax charges fell apart Wednesday, most likely because the Justice Department rushed to charge the case and failed to follow standard investigative processes. I urge Attorney General Merrick Garland to appoint a special counsel so an independent reviewer can examine what I believe were deficient investigative steps and improper decisions.

Justice officials prevented investigators from following the evidence. Appointing a special counsel would create a path for the investigation to continue with integrity. I hope transparency will restore public confidence in the idea that every U.S. taxpayer receives equal treatment under the law. Sweetheart deals shouldn’t be handed out like candy to the rich, powerful and politically connected.

Ziegler explained that the reason he decided to come forward was because “Hunter Biden received preferential treatment” from IRS officials tasked with investigating him. “Although some in Congress tried to explain away my concerns, what I saw during the investigation was entirely outside the norm,” he wrote.

The official continued, detailing “disagreements between prosecutors and investigators” during the probe into Hunter’s activities. He recounted how “[t]hings reached a breaking point” when he and fellow whistleblower Gary Shapley were “sidelined” after clashing with U.S. Attorney David Weiss:

Four assigned prosecutors and Mr. Weiss had agreed to recommend the approval of misdemeanor and felony charges for 2017-19 before Mr. Weiss ultimately claimed he wasn’t the deciding person on whether to file charges. When Biden-appointed U.S. attorneys in the District of Columbia and the Central District of California declined the case after only a brief review, and refused to allow Mr. Shapley or me to brief them on our findings, I knew I had to blow the whistle.

He later concluded the piece by noting that he has “no regrets” about blowing the whistle and urged others to also come forward if they witness corruption.

I’ll just get this part out of the way.

If former President Donald Trump were still in office, and there were similar allegations about the Trump family, members of the activist media would be calling every day for a special prosecutor to be appointed. Democrats in Congress would be caterwauling about how these suspicions warrant an impartial investigation into the matter of the Orange Man What Is Bad™ and the rest of the family.

Is it not slightly odd that this is not happening with President Joe Biden’s son? Shouldn’t the press be at least a little curious about claims that folks at the IRS and FBI worked to shield members of the Biden family from legal scrutiny?

Well, not really, at least if you have been paying attention over the past decade.

Nevertheless, if there was ever a situation that called for the appointment of a Special Counsel, it would be this one. It would make for a more thorough and fair investigation. Going this route would decrease the likelihood that biased elements in the government would try to get Hunter off.

Moreover, a Special Counsel would promote greater transparency. Both the IRS and FBI tried to conceal allegations against Hunter to protect him. Even after an FBI official came forward exposing the existence of an official document detailing allegations that a Ukrainian businessman bribed Hunter and Joe Biden, the agency seemed to sweep it under the rug.

Most importantly, a Special Counsel investigation could unearth more details about corruption in the federal government that are important for the public to know – and bring criminal charges in any jurisdiction in the country without needing approval from that state’s U.S. Attorney. This whole situation is bigger than the Biden crime family; if the allegations are true, it is about people using the power of the state to protect political allies while targeting the opposition. It’s the stuff movies are made of. As we’ve seen through the ongoing indictments coming out of Jack Smith’s investigation, a Special Counsel can and will indict people alleged to have covered for their main target. In this case, that could include people in the FBI or Department of Justice, or even the White House.

Unfortunately, President Biden and his merry band of Democrats know this. Therefore, they are about as likely to support the appointment of a Special Counsel as snow is to fall on the Sahara. The very last thing these people want is for government corruption to be exposed in such a manner.

Moreover, they definitely don’t want their president’s dirty laundry aired.

Attorney General Merrick Garland assured Congress during his confirmation hearings that the investigation into Hunter Biden’s business dealings wouldn’t be impeded by politics, and he’s doubled down on that promise, and since the IRS whistleblowers came forward, claiming that everything has been above-board. The public, judging by polls, highly doubts Garland’s sincerity. Congressional Republicans need to stand behind these whistleblowers and demand that Garland appoint a Special Counsel we can all trust, and even dangle the possibility of filing articles of impeachment against Garland himself if he doesn’t.



World Seeks to Bypass Surrogacy Laws By Renting Wombs in War-Torn Ukraine

The desire to commission children has either blinded people to the tragedies of Ukraine’s womb rental service or numbed them to it.



Ukraine may be embroiled in what could be the beginning of another world war, but its babymaking and womb-rental business is booming.

More than 2,000 babies are born to Ukrainian surrogates each year. Despite the country’s ongoing violent conflict with Russia, that number doesn’t seem to be slowing down.

“We’ve been trying to make the dream of having our own child come true for 10 years. It won’t be the bombs or the war that will stop us,” one Italian couple seeking a surrogate in Ukraine told The Guardian.

In Italy, much like most of Western Europe, surrogacy is illegal, and the Italian parliament is on its way to criminalizing commercial surrogacy arrangements abroad. Where surrogacy bans and restrictions fail, however, shady and exploitative Ukrainian fertility firms prevail.

Ukraine is a popular destination for people looking to buy eggs or rent a womb because of its lax assisted reproductive technology (ART) laws and cheap labor. Customers mostly come from countries in Western Europe, South America, and Asia where ART and commercial surrogacy are heavily restricted, if not banned. But even American couples who have access to one of the most unregulated fertility industries in the world seek the help of Eastern European companies and women to grow and deliver their babies.

Conducting reproductive business overseas, however, is no easy task. As Politico highlighted in a report this week, one California woman and her husband paid $10,000 to ship two of their embryos to Kyiv in an effort to avoid skyrocketing surrogacy costs in the U.S. The popular Ukrainian fertility firm BioTexCom confirmed it received the shipment but quickly told 45-year-old Tanya that transferring the embryos to a rented womb failed.

When Tanya’s husband, who happened to be on business in Ukraine at the time, stopped in to ask questions, BioTexCom reportedly “immediately thanked him for donating their embryos to another couple.” That was in 2017. To this day, even after filing complaints with Interpol, Tanya and her husband still do not know what happened to their unborn babies.

“The unfortunate part is there’s so little that we could do about it, you know?” Tanya recalled in her interview with Politico. “That was a very traumatic situation. … We’re five years down the road from the situation and I think I only came to terms with it about a year ago.”

BioTexCom, which is reported to control “one fourth of the global surrogacy market and 70 percent of the market in Ukraine” and has more than 10,000 eggs in storage, denies Tanya’s story, but her account is not the only tragedy born of this international babymaking business.

Profiting Off of Poverty and Pain

Ukraine’s most popular surrogacy company is plagued with allegations of exploitation, medical neglect, and misconduct that have led to the switching of babies at birth, deaths of unborn babies, surrogate mothers, life-threatening early deliveries, and heartbreak for all of the parties involved in the transaction.

Ukrainian agencies like BioTexCom prey on young, cash-strapped women who can’t even afford to keep their children to birth someone else’s in exchange for money. Some of these women, drawn into the industry by the myriad of advertisements plastered on public transportation, don’t understand why they have to give the children up and ask their agencies if they can keep the baby they are carrying.

“It’s a terrible thing when a grown person does not belong to herself,” one Ukrainian surrogate told to the parents of the child she was carrying.

One unforeseen disaster of BioTexCom’s sale of outsourced reproduction was the creation of “stateless” babies like Bridget. She was born to a Ukrainian surrogate in the early 2010s due to complications but was never picked up by her American parents. Despite paying big bucks to commission the child, the U.S. citizens didn’t want to bring home a disabled daughter, which left her stranded at a children’s home and unavailable for adoption until the Ukrainian government chose to grant her citizenship years later.

Even European and American parents who intended to pick up their children faced obstacles due to Covid-19. During the height of the world’s pandemic panic, surrogates in Kyiv and its surrounding area birthed, nursed, and cared for the marooned children they carried for months because the biological parents could not travel to Ukraine.

Right when the Covid calamity began to die down, tensions between Russia and Ukraine flared up and made international travel into the area dangerous and difficult. Hundreds more babies were stranded and designated to the care of “nannies” as bombs destroyed the land around them.

Albert Tochilovsky, BioTexCom’s owner, often deflects criticism about situations like these by denying allegations or blaming other fertility firms for his company’s mistakes. Yet, over and over, investigations conclude that Ukraine’s surrogacy industry, no matter how popular, is not physically, legally, or morally sustainable.

Even Tochilovsky admits that his top priority is not ethics or even the prevailing narrative that he’s helping families have children; it’s “to prohibit the intervention of law enforcement agencies into our work.”

Despite BioTexCom’s scandalous track record, medical tourists flock to its headquarters with hopes of fulfilling their desires to start a family.

The increasingly infertile world’s yearning to commission children has either blinded them to the tragedies that lie at the heart of Ukraine’s womb rental service or numbed them to it.

There’s a reason so many of BioTexCom’s customers hail from countries where commercial surrogacy is banned. The practice is demonstrably harmful to the unborn baby, the surrogate mother, and the intended parents. Countries that allow it and customers who pay for it to continue, especially in such a lawless way, are only exacerbating those problems.



Pee-wee Herman actor Paul Reubens dies

 

US actor Paul Reubens, who came to fame in the 1980s as children's TV star Pee-wee Herman, has died.

The 70-year-old died overnight after a years-long battle with cancer, his team said on Monday.

A statement describing Reubens as an "iconic American actor, comedian, writer and producer" was posted to his Facebook account.

It said: "Last night we said farewell to Paul Reubens, an iconic American actor, comedian, writer and producer whose beloved character Pee-wee Herman delighted generations of children and adults with his positivity, whimsy and belief in the importance of kindness.  


"Paul bravely and privately fought cancer for years with his trademark tenacity and wit. A gifted and prolific talent, he will forever live in the comedy pantheon and in our hearts as a treasured friend and man of remarkable character and generosity of spirit."

Pee-Wee Herman was a nerdy character who wore a grey suit and red bow tie while delighting children with his distinctive "heh heh heh" laugh  


https://news.sky.com/story/pee-wee-herman-actor-paul-reubens-dies-12931402   




Expect Climate Alarmism To Heat Up In California This Wildfire Season

California’s forests are now up to 600 percent denser than 150 years ago, with high tree density making trees more vulnerable to insects, disease, and fire.  



There’s been a lot of focus on the weather recently. It’s summer, so it’s hot in some parts. But the official line is that the temperatures are unprecedented and the result of — you guessed it — climate change.  

Like clockwork, the Biden White House uses summer to trot out alarmist claims about “extreme heat waves” and the “climate crisis” to justify spending billions on pet projects.  

Facts, of course, don’t matter. As meteorology student Chris Martz points out, the first 53 of 92 days of summer in the Lower 48 have been a little cooler than average so far.  

Heat domes and the jet stream tend to do that. It’s called “weather.”  

Meanwhile, water vapor, which accounts for 97 percent of greenhouse gases in our atmosphere, got a massive 13 percent boost in our stratosphere by the January 2022 eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai, a submarine volcano in the southern Pacific — with the natural greenhouse gas likely to stay aloft for several years. Meanwhile, our nearest star is waking up with Solar Cycle 25, and the Pacific Ocean shifted from La Niña to El Niño in June.  

In California, the leftmost pole in the dipole climate alarmism system (D.C. being the other), cries of drought blamed on human action drown out the inconvenient fact of a lack of water storage due to human inaction. Oddly, the state is out of its drought now, temporarily depriving insincere actors like Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom of a major talking point.  

But California is a land of both historic drought and a Mediterranean climate.  

In 850 AD, 1,052 years before Willis Haviland Carrier invented the modern air conditioner, California was hit with a megadrought that lasted 240 years. Only 50 years later, a second drought struck that stretched another 180 years. Goodness knows what the climate crisis-industrial complex would say today if California were in the middle of a 10-year dry spell.  

The Mediterranean aspect of California’s weather patterns is poorly appreciated by most of the rest of the nation — and even among Californians. The practical effect is two-fold: First, it makes for a dry, pleasant climate for seven months out of the year, with 75 percent of precipitation falling in the five months between November and March. And come the end of summer, no matter how much snow and rain fell the prior winter, it gets tinder dry, setting the stage for fire season. (I retired as the deputy J1 of the California National Guard in 2007. We used to joke that the Golden State had four seasons: flood, fire, earthquake, and riot.) 

Thus, even though California enjoyed a heavy winter, with much of the key Sierra snowpack at 200 percent of normal, the inevitable dry months will prime Democrat news releases for linking wildfires to greenhouse emissions by August.  

The problem with connecting California’s wildfires to climate change is that it’s just another fable that serves to cover up the real culprit: terrible forest management practices by both state and federal officials.  

When gold was discovered in California in 1848, the rush to the West brought photographers. George E. Gruell, a wildlife biologist, developed the idea to compare photos taken in the Sierra Nevada forest then with contemporary views today. What he found was remarkable. In the 1850s, fire routinely shaped California’s landscape. Native American tribes often purposefully set fires because they knew that forests were a poor source of food compared to grassland. Most of the indigenous residents of California at the time were nomadic. If fire threatened them, then they could move.  

This was not so for the new pioneers who tended to build permanent, if mostly flammable, structures. Burning the forests shifted quickly to harvesting the trees and suppressing the fires. By the 1990s, environmental policies curtailed the harvesting aspect but left in place the fire suppression efforts.  

But, in an average year, California forests grow about 3.8 billion board feet of new timber — more when the winter’s wet. And if that timber doesn’t get cut and used, it must, in time, burn. It’s the tyranny of photosynthetic math: Water plus carbon dioxide equals megatons of flammable cellulose.  

Forest mismanagement became so entrenched in California that its state legislature voted to study the forests’ carbon sequestration capability. The resulting report said that forests protected from commercial timber harvests were now net greenhouse gas emitters due to fires and trees killed by insects and disease. California’s forests are now up to 600 percent denser than 150 years ago, with high tree density increasing water stress and making trees more vulnerable to insects, disease, and fire.  

The wildfires that will sweep California in a few months will be put to good use in service of climate alarmist propaganda. Newsom and his corporate media allies will see to that.  

But never fear. Rather than tackling the problem, California will continue to go down the road of banning internal combustion engines while trying to guilt the rest of us into walking to work.