Monday, December 19, 2022

SCOTUS Places Temporary Hold on Lifting of Title 42


Susie Moore reportng for RedState 

As RedState has been reporting, Title 42 is set to expire on Wednesday. The provision, invoked during the Trump administration, allowed for the swift expulsion of immigrants at the border due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Thousands of immigrants have been amassing at the US border and even entering the interior in anticipation of its expiration, prompting the Mayor of El Paso to declare a state of emergency.

Several states appealed to the US Supreme Court in a last-ditch effort to halt the lifting of the provision. Late Monday afternoon, the Court placed a temporary hold on the matter. Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced the Court’s action on Twitter:

The brief Order, signed by Chief Justice John Roberts, places a stay on the November 15, 2022 Order issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia:

UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicants,

IT IS ORDERED that the November 15, 2022 order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, case No. 1:21-cv-00100, is hereby stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court. It is further ordered that a response to the application be filed on or before Tuesday, December 20, 2022, by 5 p.m. (EST).

Per NBC:

[Chief Justice] Roberts ordered that the federal district court ruling, which was due to go into effect on Wednesday, be put on hold until the Supreme Court acts. He asked the Biden administration and groups challenging the policy to file a response to the states’ request by Tuesday afternoon.

Nineteen states led by Arizona and Louisiana filed an emergency request after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit last week rejected their request to intervene in the case in a bid to prevent the policy, known as Title 42, being wound down.

“Getting rid of Title 42 will recklessly and needlessly endanger more Americans and migrants by exacerbating the catastrophe that is occurring at our southern border,” Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said in a statement.

Per the Order, a response is due Tuesday afternoon.

Obviously, this is a continuing story and we will provide updates as they become available.




Will the Democrats Dump Biden in 2024?


Short answer: no. I am 100% convinced that, if the man is still breathing, the Democratic Party will re-nominate the Biden-Harris ticket in 2024. Even though polls indicate that a majority of Democrats don’t want Biden to run again, the party leaders aren’t going to pay any attention to what the party faithful want. The Republican Party leadership never does, and neither will the Democratic brain trust. Biden is a shoo-in.

I mean, he has given them everything they want. Why WOULDN’T they re-nominate him? Are they going to nominate somebody who will do what Republicans want to be done? Not hardly.

Admittedly, he is old, and he does have a tough job. Going back and forth to Delaware every weekend must be taxing. Speaking of taxing, taxing the middle-class and everybody else in sight also is surely tiring. Hosting drag shows at the White House and approving of new ways for perverts to spread their filth around the country does have to strain what non-existent brain power he has. Meeting with Hunter’s business partners and counting the money he makes from those deals is time-consuming, and shaking hands with people who don’t exist could exhaust someone half his age. Eating tons of ice creams must create fatigue. Living with Taco Jill…well, I’ll leave that one be.  

Being President isn’t easy. He might not last much longer.

But, if he does, he will be the nominee. Not surprisingly, I have some historical reasons for believing such.

Only once in American history has a political party failed to re-nominate an elected President who sought four more years (Franklin Pierce, 1856. A few VPs who ascended at the death of the elected President didn’t get the next nomination.). Herbert Hoover, the Republican President (elected in 1928) who got hit with the Great Depression and was clueless about what to do about it, was re-nominated (and slaughtered) in 1932. Jimmy Carter, the abysmal flop from 1976 to 1980, was back on top of the ticket in 1980 (and slaughtered). Even a very popular Teddy Roosevelt couldn’t unseat an unhappy and mediocre William Howard Taft for the Republican nomination in 1912; TR decided to run on a third-party ticket and only succeeded in throwing the election to the Democrat Woodrow Wilson, and America suffered from TR’s deplorable decision ever since. A political party doesn’t remove a popularly-elected President. A few Presidents (e.g., James Polk, and James Buchanan) honored their commitment to only serve one term and did not seek re-election. But, only Pierce was elected and then booted off the ticket the next go-round. 

It just isn’t done. Because of the primary system, it would be blaming the party faithful for giving the country an idiot. “Don’t be so stupid, give us somebody better this time!” is not something you want to throw at your party members.

The Vice-Presidency is not quite as secure, but almost. No political party has removed a sitting VP from the ticket since FDR did it in 1944 and gave us Harry Truman instead of Henry Wallace (not the last of Roosevelt’s innumerable mistakes). Since then, the Vice-President has been safe for the second term. Again, it would be admitting a huge blunder if the incumbent were removed. And we all know politicians NEVER make mistakes. At least not big ones like that.

Biden could step down “voluntarily,” of course. I put “voluntarily” in quotation marks because that is how it would be sold to the public. He actually would have been forced out by worried Democratic leadership, but they—and their media accomplices—would spin it as “President Biden has decided not to run for re-election. He wants to spend more time with Hunter…” Well, maybe not the last sentence, but it would be Biden’s “decision,” (age might be used), not a forced retirement. Lyndon Johnson decided not to seek re-election in 1968, and that didn’t appear to be forced upon him, but one can never be sure what evil lurks in the back halls of political caucuses.  

But Biden will never leave the Presidency voluntarily. The man is too arrogant, narcissistic, and uncaring about the welfare of the American people to give up power by himself. He will leave the White House only to be defeated in 2024 or a pine box. Or, when his second term is over in 2028. Never, sans serious illness, of his own volition.

And Kamala will be his giggling lap dog to the end.   

The Democratic Party leadership might be able, behind those closed caucus doors, to compel Biden to retire. And they might threaten him somehow if he says no. That is if they want another candidate. Again, I’m not sure why the Democratic Party leadership would want Biden out of the White House, given what he has done for the country, i.e., how effectively he is destroying it by their ideology and plan. But if they seriously sense possible defeat in 2024 because the American people are fed up with Biden, they WILL drive him out. Biden isn’t strong enough to defeat the entirety of the Democratic Party moguldom.

But if things are no worse than they are now (how can they be, and things are great to Democrats), and if Biden wants the presidency again, and if the Democrats think they can steal another election for him, he will get the nomination in 2024. Of course, that is over a year away and a lot could happen. But right now, he is the Democratic Party nominee in the next election.

Of course, if they needed to, the Dems could replace Biden with John Fetterman and nobody would be able to tell there had been a switch.



X22, Christian Patriot News, and more- December 19

 



ICYMI: https://wwwp-lives.blogspot.com/2022/12/great-american-christmas-year-2-review.html

Here's tonight's news:


Only Ron DeSantis Can Win in 2024

Ron DeSantis’ time is not in 2028. 
It is now, heading into 2024. 
Or it will never happen.


In a head-to-head match-up, Florida’s Republican Governor Ron DeSantis defeats former U.S. President Donald J. Trump. If one were to produce a trendline of the last years’ worth of polling on DeSantis and Trump, one would see that DeSantis’ support among Republican voters has increased whereas Trump’s has declined

Some colleagues of mine in MAGA-world insist that it won’t matter who wins the Republican nomination in 2024 until voter fraud is addressed. While I certainly agree that our elections have been corrupted by the Left, how can one say that our elections are hopelessly—systemically—rigged against Republicans and then spend so much time and effort worrying that Donald Trump won’t be our nominee? If things were that hopeless, why would anyone care? 

As with most Trumpworld criticisms of DeSantis, that argument displays deep cognitive dissonance. 

The biggest issue our federal elections face is not absentee and/or early voting, which has been with us in one form another as long ago as 1980. and historically has benefited Republican candidates. The problem, as others have rightly assessed, is in the fact that many swing states in 2020 lowered their standards for mail-in voting as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. When those changes to mail-in-voting occurred in the spring of 2020, Trump—the president at the time—did little more than complain about the problem at some of his rallies. 

Meanwhile, there was one Republican leader who spent the last two years addressing the problems in our election system at the state level: Ron DeSantis. Because of his visionary leadership, Florida had the cleanest election in the country in 2022. Imagine scaling his policies up and making them national as would happen if he were president. 

Another argument the budding “Never DeSantis” movement is making is the false claim that DeSantis must “wait for 2028.” Destiny does not wait. Imagine if the founders had waited to declare independence from the British Empire until a more opportune time had arisen (spoiler alert: life rarely presents perfect moments of the kind Trumpists think DeSantis should wait for).

These arguments bely a dangerous degree of decadence on the part of those making such specious claims. Imagine the chutzpah it takes for one to insist, as everything is burning, that our best and brightest should “wait their turn” to step forward. Simply to protect the bruised ego of a former president whose negative attributes now outstrip his positive ones in the eyes of most voters? 

What’s more, the country needs both competence and courage from its potential presidents. I can’t think of a greater sign of courage than that of the upstart Ron DeSantis (David) challenging a deeply flawed and rapidly aging giant, like Donald Trump (Goliath) for the party’s nomination in 2024.  

An even more cringe variation of the “wait ’til ’28” argument goes that “Florida needs” DeSantis in 2024. What the Boomer transplants from the North who argue this clearly don’t know is that DeSantis is term limited as governor. Unless Florida law is changed, he cannot run for a third term. As an actual Floridian (who was raised in this state and lives in the hometown he was raised in), I do not fancy changing my state’s constitution just to appease the Boomer Northerners who want to see their fellow Boomer New Yorker, Trump, back in office by not being challenged from a younger, more popular, and disciplined Ron DeSantis.

Alas, carpetbaggers usually don’t understand the states south of the Mason-Dixon to which they routinely condescend. And that’s precisely what that argument is: rank condescension. The fact an argument like that is so often coming from Trump supporters who were subjected to similar condescension from the elitist, globalist Bush Family side of the Republican Party in 2016 is especially disheartening. They should know better.

The last several presidential cycles have begun a minimum of two years before the actual campaign took place. In that time, those who wanted to run usually began organizing for their runs while they held office or continued working at their day jobs. Trump himself has already announced his bid for the presidency and there’s nothing stopping a politician from running while holding another office. In fact, that’s how most candidates have to run.  

One other overwrought accusation Trump supporters wrongly lob at DeSantis is that he’s somehow a tool of the “globalists.” They say that because Ken Griffith, a wealthy hedge funder who has a history of bankrolling Republican political campaigns, is behind DeSantis now that is evidence of his perfidy. Of course, these same voices completely ignore the fact that Trump has spent his entire presidency sucking up to big Republican donors. In fact, he staffed most of his administration with the same swamp creatures he was sent to defeat!

Others of these pundits claim that supporting DeSantis is a “trap” the elites have set for us foolish yokels. They never address the fact that DeSantis’ record as governor is more Trumpian than even President Trump’s was. Want to see a state that ended its COVID lockdowns or refused to impose vaccine mandates? How about a government that took on corrupt mega corporations and their satanic social agenda—rather than just rage tweet about it? It wasn’t the Trump Administration that did these things. It was DeSantis’ Florida. 

Nor do these DeSantis opponents seem to be aware that there’s no public figure who can galvanize record numbers of people to vote against him than Trump. 

DeSantis’ detractors on the Right often bring up the fact that the likes of former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) or Senator Mitt Romney (R-Utah) have all made positive statements about DeSantis’ potential presidential bid. However, they refuse to close that particular mental loop by acknowledging that basically every conservative with a voice has uttered some form of support for DeSantis’ eventual run. 

Beyond that, DeSantis’ critics on the Right neglect to acknowledge that as president, Trump happily handed his legislative agenda over to the likes of Paul Ryan and endeavored to make Mitt Romney his secretary of state (which is one reason why the Trump Administration failed to build a wall but easily gave us more tax cuts and Mideast bombing missions).

For his third presidential run, Trump is the weakest he’s ever been politically. He’s also going to be in his mid-70s. Trump’s record is mixed at best. His heart is in the right place. Sadly, he has consistently shown his inability to overcome his own political inexperience or his own personality quirks to achieve the great task of bringing the administrative state to heel. 

This is not the case for Ron DeSantis. His time is not in 2028. It is now, heading into 2024. Or it will never happen.




10 Steps to Save America ~ VDH

Yes, there is a way. But is there the will?

Most Americans know something has gone terribly wrong—and very abruptly—with the United States. They are certain that our wounds are almost all self-inflicted. The current pathologies are not a result of a natural disaster, an exhaustion of natural resources, plagues, or an existential war. 

Crushing national debt and annual deficits, spiraling food and fuel costs amid “normal” seven-percent-plus annual inflation, bread-and-circuses entitlements, a nonexistent border, a resurgence of racial tribalism, pandemic violent criminality, and humiliation abroad—all these pathologies are easily cited as symptoms of a sick patient. Our crises are not as the Left maintains—a nine-person Supreme Court, the Electoral College, or the filibuster—all distractions from existential problems the Left largely created. 

So, what are the therapies and prognoses for America?

In the spirit of constructive rather than blanket criticism, here is a partial, 10-point plan of national recovery.

Cut the Debt 

Americans’ national debt is now $31 trillion. That is about 123 percent of current GDP. The liabilities are unsustainable. We run annual deficits of $1.6 trillion. These financial obligations will eventually ensure that rising interest rates to service the debt crowd out essential spending for national defense and the general welfare. 

Or in extremis, in the not too distant future, the government will be forced to default on what it owes the “rich” bondholders and foreign debt holders. Or the government will be forced to confiscate private wealth, as for example occasional crazy suggestions to nationalize and absorb 401(k)k retirement plans into the soon-to-be-insolvent Social Security system. Or the state will simply print millions of dollars to pay off obligations, Weimar-style.

In addict style, the more we come to realize that our binging habit cannot go on, the less we can practice self-restraint. And the more it is the case that those who receive government redistributions outnumber those who pay the majority of federal income taxes, the less hope there remains to avoid insolvency.

In 2010 then-President Barack Obama appointed a bipartisan “National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform.” More commonly  remembered as the Simpson-Bowles commission, after chairmen Senators Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) and Erskine Bowles (D-N.C.), it included private citizens and elected officials. 

The commission recommended radical tax simplifications and some cuts—along with reductions in tax deductions and credits, an increase in the gas tax, restraints on entitlement spending, and various spending caps. 

Obama and Congress ultimately rejected the recommendations and the commission’s blueprint died. But had it succeeded, the current debt would have long been frozen at the 2014 level of $17 trillion—with annual reductions ensuring that this coming year 2023 the debt would have plunged to $10 trillion and then disappeared in another decade. 

Something like Simpson-Bowles could still stop the madness and avoid the natural corrective on the horizon of financial collapse. Note that federal tax revenue has increased almost every year since 2010. Sometimes it grows by nearly a half-trillion dollars per annum, even as we sink deeper in debt. Our crisis, then, is one of spending what we do not have rather than one of declining revenue.

Secure the Border 

We no longer have a southern border. There have been 5 million illegal border crossings just since Joe Biden took office. He intentionally destroyed immigration law for cheap political advantage. Nearly 50 million current American residents were not born in the United States. Well over 20 million—and perhaps 30 million—are illegal aliens. Old melting-pot efforts at assimilation and integration eroded into the salad-bowl metaphor that has just become tribalism—even as intermarriage is at an all-time high. 

The Left brags that “demography is destiny” as it cheers the changes in the electorate aimed at ensuring its political dominance. And simultaneously, it smears conservatives who agree with its triumphalism as “great replacement theory” conspiracists. 

Yet we finally found a solution in 2019-2020. Had we continued replacing rickety border fencing with an effective wall and then completed it along the entire border, had we stopped catch-and-release, had we continued demanding that refugee status be obtained before entry, had we forced Mexico and Central American governments to stop exporting human capital and subjected them to taxes on more than $60 billion in annual remittances (along with trade penalties) for their complicity with the situation at the border, had we continued to deport those who entered illegally, had we returned to assimilation and integration on the theory any who entered America did so because they wanted to become Americans, then a desired legal, meritocratic, and diverse immigration policy might easily have assimilated and absorbed perhaps 200,000 skilled and legal immigrants per year. 

Again, we had the outlines of a solution and then simply destroyed it for liberal political agendas and cheap corporate labor. 

Tap Natural Resources 

Similarly, by 2020, the United States enjoyed inexpensive fuel. It was all but independent in gas and oil. It had become the world largest combined gas and oil producer. That status radically curtailed the need for optional military engagements in the Middle East. It gave America enormous clout against hostile oil exporters like Russia, Iran, and Venezuela. And such independence helped reduce vast trade deficits. 

Again, the Biden Administration simply exploded the idea of fossil-fuel independence as a gradual transition to sustainable energy. So simply doing the opposite of its policies would correct the pathology almost immediately: Issue more federal gas and oil leases, approve the Keystone and Constitution pipelines, reopen the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, and build nuclear power plants. The present course of high-priced and scarce gasoline and oil is eroding the middle class, spiking inflation, widening class divisions, and reducing American autonomy abroad. 

Oppose Discrimination

Never has the United States seen more evidence of progress in racial relations, and never has such progress given way to more tribalism. If we do not return to a Martin Luther King, Jr. “content of our character” policy—one that views race as incidental rather than essential to who we are—then our future is a sectarian one with echoes of the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, and Iraq. 

Affirmative action was never envisioned as permanent quotas and race-based reverse-discrimination. Yet after over a half-century it has ballooned under the idea of “diversity” to invent a victim class of nearly a third of the nation, absurdly and loosely defined—in an age of commonplace intermarriage—as “non-white.” 

Help for the underprivileged should be race-neutral and entirely based on class and income, given numerous ethnicities exceed the so-called white medium income. The labyrinth of racial categories grows unfathomable. The identity politics mess logically results, on the one hand, with rank iconic frauds like Elizabeth Warren, Ward Churchill, and Rachel Dolezal, and, the other hand, with well-off poseur victims in the manner of a Meghan Markle, Colin Kaepernick, or Jussie Smollett. 

Substitution of racial criteria for merit, rather than aiding the poor of all races, is creating a commissar-like drag on the economy, spiking racial and ethnic tensions, and ensuring that every group will eventually, for its survival, go tribal on the basis of the same logic that applies to nuclear proliferation. Again, the remedy? Just enforce civil rights statutes that prohibit racial discrimination and consider the Pavlovian shriek of “racism!” as the revealing projection of racists.

Disrupt and Reform Higher Education 

Our universities are failing to produce competent graduates essential to a meritocratic nation engaged in fierce global competition. Increasingly, students are politicized, largely ignorant, indebted, bitter, and unable to ensure American preeminence in basic science, technology, engineering, and math. 

Yet the solutions are again simple: get the government out of the student-loan business that ensures escalating tuition hikes greater than the rate of inflation. Eliminate faculty tenure and replace it with five-year contracts that require demonstrable achievement. Subject large endowments to taxation on their interest income to curb their wasted spending. Allow public schools to hire either those with school of education credentials or one-year master’s degrees that focused solely on academic study. Require standardized exit tests, in the fashion of erstwhile SAT and ACT entry tests, for the certification of the bachelor’s degree. Force universities to follow the Bill of Rights on campus, regarding due process and freedom of expression. 

These are not radical suggestions. Yet the likely fierce faculty opposition to them is proof that the Left envisions higher education as it views Silicon Valley—another private monopoly that helps to maintain political power in lieu of popular support.

Revive the Armed Forces 

Our military is in dire straits. It is overcommitted, under-resourced, and without any geo-political strategy other than ad hoc responses without defined objectives. It has become politically weaponized and, inevitably, unable to meet recruitment goals. The Pentagon remains obsessed with exorbitantly priced weapons that cannot be produced in sufficient numbers in an age of hostile swarms of cheap, mass-produced drones and thousands of batteries of ground-to-air and shore-to-ship missiles. 

Constant profiling, racial, and gender quotas and obsessions over proportional representation and disparate impact increasingly apply to training, education, and promotion—to everything except worries over the disproportionate profile of those killed in battle. The Pentagon has become adept in publishing racial data on every aspect of military service to emphasize disparity and bias—except concerning the combat dead. 

To address the changes, retiring high-ranking officers should refrain from board memberships on contracting corporations for at least five years upon leaving the military. The uniform code of military justice must be strictly enforced, including article 88 which prohibits retired officers from attacking in personal terms high-ranking elected officials, and in particular their commander-in-chief. 

Woke training is destroying morale and battlefield efficacy. The military must return to a race and gender neutral stance that does not erode meritocratic standards to fit political agendas. We should never again witness a chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff virtue signaling to Congress and the nation his intention to understand “white rage” in the ranks, without supplying any confirmatory evidence or data for his apparent allegation of systemic racism in the ranks—particularly not while the greatest U.S. defeat and humiliation in a half-century was unfolding on the horizon in Kabul. Any high-ranking military officer who informs his Chinese counterpart of his own psychiatric diagnosis that his commander-in-chief is unhinged and thus U.S. strategic intentions will first be relayed to Beijing should be summarily dismissed.

Fix Voting 

Elections are a mess. The greatest political revolution in our election history has been the change—accelerated under the cover of COVID and the George Floyd riots—in many key estates from a 20-30 percent “absentee ballot” vote to 70-80 percent early/mail-in balloting. In a mere four years we have all but destroyed Election Day voting and Election Night final tabulations as we had known them for decades. 

All discussions of voter IDs, fraud, and charges and countercharges of election denialism are irrelevant if there is no real mechanism to validate the authenticity of mail-in ballots that have incomplete or false addresses, names, and signatures, or do not match registration rolls. Third-party ballot harvesting and ballot curing should be outlawed at the federal level, and we should return to the requirement of requesting absentee ballots rather than automatically sending them out. Otherwise, no future election will again win the confidence of a majority of Americans. And without trust in balloting, consensual government becomes nonexistent.

Drain the Swamp 

Americans distrust the “swamp,” administrative state, or deep state. Call what you will, the Washington nexus of bureaucracies, media, and lobbyists has created a huge, unelected permanent army of auditors, regulators, investigators, and punishers, all mostly exempt from audit and accountability and without fear of their elected overseers. 

The easiest solution is to break up concentrations of power. Transfer out of Washington, in this age of zoom and telecommunications, major cabinet departments like Health and Human Services, Energy, or Agriculture into the hinterland. Restore the idea that lying to Congress, feigning amnesia, or pleading ignorance under oath to Congress or federal investigators or in depositions is a prosecutable felony with jail time. 

Had we restored equality under the law, then an Andrew McCabe, James Clapper, and John Brennan would not have dared lie under oath. And a Robert Mueller, James Comey, Anthony Fauci, or Jack Dorsey might have not so easily believed they simply could plead memory loss or mislead in a fashion that no American would dare to do with the IRS. 

Being forced to tell the truth would be a powerful deterrent against bureaucratic overreach. 

Finally, ossified centralized agencies like the FBI need to be broken up and their bureaus redistributed through the cabinet-level departments to avoid past pathologies resulting from a concentration of power.

Upend the Welfare State 

The number of those receiving federal and state subsidies is beginning to match the number of those who subsidize them. “No one wants to work anymore” is now a common public lament. Inflation and recession may come and go, but workers are now scarce whether we are in boom or bust times. Labor non-participation remains at an all-time high. Soon only 60 percent of the available labor force will be working. Trillion-dollar COVID subsidies have accelerated the idea that Americans need not work full-time to maintain a living. 

We can easily return to the “workfare” championed by a triangulating Bill Clinton in the 1990s that demanded healthy and able recipients to be gainfully employed upon receipt of state and federal cash. In the context of the homeless, we need to return to pre-Reagan norms of institutionalizing the mentally ill and creating hospitals and safe spaces away from American downtowns to house those who either cannot or will not take care of themselves. Defecating, urinating, injecting, and fornicating on city-streets are not victimless crimes, but assaults on civilized life as we once knew it.

Restore Norms 

Fact is, few public norms are left. Rather than the current therapeutic obsessions that seek to divide Americans into binaries of oppressors and the oppressed, we are in desperate need of civic education in K-12 that acquaints all children and teens with American institutions, key events like Gettysburg or D-Day, and familiarity with the Constitution and the duties of the citizen. We will get nowhere basing our understanding of the world on psychodramas and therapeutics. 

Neither journalists nor elites understand, much less appreciate, the First Amendment, and in ignorance despises the Second.

Like it or not, the nuclear family remains the bulwark of the American nation, which will not survive if current fertility rates of below 1.7 children per woman continue to diminish and age the population. The government must incentivize childbearing and child raising. 

Without clear punishment for violent crimes, deterrence is lost, and the innocent become victims of the exempt criminal class. Critical race theory, critical legal theory, and critical criminology theory are euphemisms for unleashing lawbreakers upon the vulnerable. We are in a strange cycle in which we deliberately do not enforce gun laws in our cities and then when murder reaches near historic proportions we blame unenforced guns laws rather than the criminals who are exempt in using deadly weapons as the cause. 

These are just a few of the many ways that the United States could stop the present madness—which, after all, was entirely self-created.




Why Are Communists Determined to Destroy the US?

Communism is everywhere in our society, 
attacking, attacking, attacking. Here's why.

To fight pornography in the schools, a Texas housewife recently appeared at a school board meeting.  She lectured the officials: "I do not want my children to learn about anal sex in middle school. ... I want you to start focusing on education, not public health."

Education, as we'll see, is the first refuge of scoundrels.  Do you imagine that this school board is hip and cutting-edge?  In fact, liberals have had few new ideas in more than a century.  During World War 1, the communist government of Hungary "imposed a system of pornographic sex education on Hungarian school pupils."  Ever since, communists have tried the same pervy tricks again and again.

During World War 1, the deputy people's commissar for culture and education was an extreme Marxist named György Lukács, then considered the most brilliant communist since Marx himself.  He advocated promiscuity, denounced the family, and encouraged children to mock their parents and religion.  The question Lukács posed was, "Who will save us from Western civilization?"

Marxist theory circa 1900 said that if Europe ever erupted in war, the working classes in every European country would rise in revolt and create a new communist Europe.  Instead, the workers in every country lined up by the millions to fight their country's enemies. 

Why is Marxist theory incorrect?  Two leading Marxist intellectuals, Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Lukács in Hungary, independently came up with the same answer.  They said that Western culture and the Christian religion had so blinded the working class to its true, Marxist class interests, that a communist revolution was impossible in the West until both could be destroyed.  That objective, established as cultural Marxism's goal at the beginning, has never changed.

When WW1 was over, Marxists set about devising strategies specifically aimed at conquering Western civilization, which is still their main obsession.

In 1918, Lukács continued refining what he called "cultural terrorism."  One component was to create sexual education courses in schools that would work to distort traditional sexual morality.  "He came to the conclusion that if sexual morals could be compromised and undermined when Christians were still children, then Christianity itself could be destroyed."

Always remember that Marx had predicted inevitable communist revolution caused by economic factors.  Now it turns out that, as a first step, the revolutionaries have to dismantle the entire Christian revolution.  Bottom line, this new Marxism had little resemblance to the older Marxism except a hatred for everything that disagreed with them.

Lukács concluded that in order to get people to accept communism, the people would need to be culturally aligned with atheism, the irrelevance of the family, the acceptance of diversity, and the tolerance of multiculturalism.  In order to achieve this, he would need to undermine the Christian family structure by promoting teenage promiscuity, teenage rebellion, and arrested development.

During 1919, he set plans in motion to de-Christianize Hungary with a program of "non-judgmental tolerance."  He reasoned that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the church would be dealt a crippling blow.

To achieve his objective, Lukács launched a radical sex education program in the schools.  Sex lectures were organized and literature handed out that graphically instructed youth in free love and sexual intercourse, while simultaneously encouraging them to deride and reject Christian ethics, monogamy, and parental and church authority.  All of this was accompanied by a reign of cultural terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and dissenters.  And all of this happened about 104 years ago.

In 1923, Lukács founded the Institute for Marxism at Frankfurt University in Weimar Germany along with fellow Marxists Herbert Marcuse and Theodor Adorno. 

Cultural Marxists came to realize that their true intentions would be better concealed if they changed the name to the Institute of Social Research, which is popularly referred to as the Frankfurt School.  Its primary goal was to translate Marxism from economic terms to cultural terms, or Freudian terms.  It would use multidisciplinary methods to indoctrinate and manufacture new groups of oppressed proletarians such as homosexuals and transsexuals.

The intellectuals tinkered and revised, but the new theories failed.  They reinvented Marxism on the fly, until it was nothing that Marx would recognize.  Their broad strategy came down to this desperate gambit: any time they encountered something honest and decent, they tried to undermine it with something sacrilegious or shocking.

After 1932, as Stalin hammered down on his masses and the Nazis became more threatening, the Bolsheviks in Germany fled to safety in the United States.  Many of the big names ended up in American universities, where they plotted how to destroy traditional views.  Pick a fad of the last hundred years, and you will find the influence of  Lukács and Gramsci, with some modification by Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse, Walter Benjamin, and Eric Fromm. (Short history of modern Marxism.)

The big point is, Marxist intellectuals pretend to seek truth and wisdom.  Nonsense.  For them, politics is war.  They are seeking your weak spots so they can destroy you.

As a result, communism is everywhere in our society, attacking, attacking, attacking.  A few decades back, communism operated under the title "political correctness."  Now it maneuvers under the title "woke."  One thing every school should inaugurate is Communism Studies . These fanatics never take a day off.  They won't be happy until you're unhappy.

Mark Levin summarized the saga best: "Democrats are hellbent on destroying our country."



Musk and Taibbi Demand Answers About FBI Asking Twitter to Track Americans, Nail Ted Lieu in Troubling Admission


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

Journalist Matt Taibbi dropped the sixth installment of the Twitter Files on Friday, showing the close relationship between the FBI and Twitter, with regular contacts from the FBI to Twitter flagging speech to take action against, as well as regular weekly meetings between Twitter and the FBI, DHS and other agencies. According to Matt Taibbi, 80 agents were assigned to this task.

The FBI responded as though this was a completely normal thing.

“The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities. Private sector entities independently make decisions about what, if any, action they take on their platforms and for their customers after the FBI has notified them.”

Taibbi tweeted that agents were being tasked to flag people for tweets rather than going after people for things like being child sex predators.

That’s when Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Ca) responded and things went over the edge. He claimed that he was on the House Judiciary Committee which has oversight and Taibbi was lying.

That’s when Taibbi dropped the bomb on Lieu.

Taibbi said:

Being on that committee you should know:
– How much has been spent, and how many DHS/DOJ employees have been assigned, to monitoring and flagging social media?
– Why is the FBI asking for “location information” about ordinary Americans and media outlets like @RSBNetwork?
– What “law enforcement” objective is served by asking for Billy Baldwin’s location information?
– Why is the FBI/DHS in the business of analyzing and flagging social media content at all? When were these programs created and who approved them?

So the FBI wasn’t just flagging tweets they didn’t like, such as jokes about when the election was, for action, but they were also asking Twitter to provide them the location of the people behind the tweets, including Right Side Broadcasting and Billy Baldwin. What can even begin to justify that?

Twitter owner Elon Musk called those “good questions” and asked Ted Lieu what the explanation for this was.

That’s when Lieu stepped into it and gave up the game.

Dear @elonmusk: Simple answer, have you tried reading FBI’s mission? From 2017 program: “The FBI considers strategic engagement with U.S. technology companies, including threat indicator sharing, to be important in combating foreign influence actors.”

Lieu then admitted he was aware of the program.

So there’s not only government involvement in going after speech but the FBI tracking Americans for speech that didn’t even come close to a crime, under the guise of trying to go after “foreign influence” and threats. And Lieu is admitting he knew and trying to justify it.

What were they going to do when they got the location of people, like Billy Baldwin? Designate manpower to follow people for joking about the election? Last time I checked, Billy Baldwin didn’t represent much of a threat except to people’s sensibilities for his bad acting. But he, just like everyone else that they were going after, deserves basic constitutional protections.

Can we scream out how much this needs to stop, what a constitutional problem it is, and how much we need answers on this? Just as a coda, maybe part of the problem is that so many FBI officials became Twitter officials.