Tuesday, November 22, 2022

A New Age of American Politics

It’s time to hit ballot harvesting hard or die trying.


After sifting through the rubble from election night, and having done some soul searching on my basic knowledge of politics, I’ve come to a few conclusions: American politics has entered a new age. All that has gone before—polls, historical trends, message, issues, candidate quality, traditional get-out-the-vote efforts, candidate debates, voter persuasion—means almost nothing and is extremely insignificant. 

The thing—the only thing—that truly matters now is a “ballots out, ballots in” machine.

With that perfected, you could elect a random name in a phone book, or a dead man, or a vegetable. Or both a dead man and a vegetable, as Pennsylvania recently demonstrated.

This epiphany is at once startling and obvious, particularly since we saw a prelude to this moment in the 2020 election cycle. So how was it missed by so many of us until after the midterms? Recent success leading to overconfidence is the answer. The Virginia results, in a blue state that went for Biden by 10 points in 2020, blunted my skepticism and made me over confident. Republicans won everything in Virginia in 2021: governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, and the House of Delegates. 

Coming out of Virginia, the conclusions—the wrong conclusions—were that we could beat whatever Democrats did in 2020 with a great focus on mid- to low-propensity voters, drive them to the polls, and overcome the rigging and manipulation. Not only did the Virginia success lead to the wrong conclusions for 2022, I’m convinced that Virginia, and even New Jersey for that matter, rang the Left’s alarm bells in a manner sufficient enough to stir them to amp up their efforts. They realized after 2021 it was time to dial in the 2020 mail-in, ballot-harvesting machine and so they did; and in all the right places.

That’s what the 2022 elections were all about. I don’t want to hear anyone crying, “Well maybe it was the abortion issue.” Nope. “Maybe it was candidate quality.” Nope (please see my previous comments on a dead man and a vegetable). “Do people really want lawlessness and inflation?” Nope. “Maybe it was extreme America First candidates turning off moderate Republican and Independent voters.” Wrong again.

It had everything to do with numbers, but not polling numbers or inflation numbers. It was about who got the most ballots sent out and who collected the most. That’s it. That’s the 2022 midterms in a nutshell.

Crass? Crude, impersonal, rife with potential fraud and corruption? 100 percent. And, in many states, perfectly legal. If conservatives and Republicans want to win again, we had better adopt the only-ballots-matter approach at least in the short term or die. I have zero ethical problems with it, none whatsoever. This is now the modern-day political battlefield in America, the rules of the game. One can either howl at the moon about it or beat the Left at it. 

So I’m going to figure out how to beat the Left at its own game in 2023 and 2024. It’s either that or we find ourselves on trains to reeducation camps in the near future. While that might sound like hyperbole, is it really when you can envision America as a one-party state? We barely squeaked out the House of Representatives in a highly advantageous midterm. Unless we figure out our ballot-out, ballot-in machine, I don’t see us winning the White House or much of anything else in 2024. And if that happens, expect the Left to come very hard for many of us.

The good news is we already have something of a model in Florida, sans the ballot harvesting and ballot drop boxes. Ask yourself how Republicans kept on winning for decades in a state that had a Democratic voter registration advantage until very recently. The answer is that Florida Republicans perfected the art of early voting, mail-in voting, and absentee ballot chasing before Election Day. While Republicans would never win the early voting and mail-in fight, they largely mitigated the damage and then crushed Democrats on Election Day. It’s what Brian Kemp did in Georgia this year, also, in beating Stacey Abrams.

So it’s time to hit this breach hard, folks. Time to get churches and gun shows to ballot harvest wherever it is legal. Time to send harvesters into rest homes where it is legal. Time to get Republican county clerks to send out mass absentee ballots, whether requested or not and then track them all. Time to create a dialed-in absentee ballot chase program where we are sending people door-to-door to collect them. We can talk about reforms after we gain political power, but we’d better invest significant sums into this now or the GOP will lose in 2024. We have seen our future. Embrace it. It can either be the republic’s death or its success.




X22, And we Know, and more- Nov 22

 



Surprisingly, I don't have anything witty to say. (other then a rant in my head about how those NCIS LA anti Hetty/Callen nuts who are still dumb enough to think Callen needs to cut her out of his life for good after he finds her need to fucking grow up and accept that it'll never happen), so, yo. Here's tonight's news:


The Same Old, Same Old Deja Vu ~ VDH


Attorney General Merrick Garland has just announced the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith.

But Smith's team will not look into the Biden family quid pro quo syndicate nor its incriminating confessionals on Hunter Biden's laptop.

Instead, it will further investigate Donald Trump's possession of presidential records that were hauled off from Mar-a-Lago, as well as his purported role in the January 6 "insurrection."

We know the script that will follow because we suffered through it for 22 months and spent $40 million for it under Robert Mueller's special counsel team.

First, the Smith investigation will bear no resemblance to special counsel John Durham's probes. The media ignored Durham. His team did not leak to the press. And neither a Washington, D.C. nor northern Virginia jury was ever likely to convict any perceived enemy of Trump.

Second, upon the announcement of Smith's legal staffers, the media will grow giddy that their resumes portend another "dream team," "all-stars," or "a hunter-killer team."

Puff pieces will blanket the media. They will attest, just like "good Ol' Bob Mueller," that the former Obama Justice Department public integrity unit lawyer Smith is "an old hand," "tough but fair," "nonpartisan," and a "prosecutor's prosecutor."

Weeks into the investigation, the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, or MSNBC will darkly inform their audiences that "unnamed sources close to the investigation tell us that "a bombshell" is about to go off.

Perhaps the "stunning development" will be similar to the fake "walls are closing in" scoop about the conspiratorial pinging in Trump tower from the Alfa Bank in Russia, or the "game-changer" Christopher Steele-fed, pee-pee, Moscow hotel room fable.

Yet one thing that will be different this time around is that the Biden administration is in power. Garland remains an unapologetic, embittered partisan. He is fresh off siccing a now-weaponized FBI on school kids' parents and various MAGA enemies of the state.

After two prior failed impeachment trials, a failed special counsel's investigation, and a failed and biased January 6 committee probe, Washington government lawyers know that their last and only Wile E. Coyote chance of catching the Roadrunner and now presidential candidate Trump is to get at least something into the hands of a Washington, D.C. jury.

We also know the script of the 2024 election from the last two elections. Election Day 2004 will be an afterthought. Election Night will be an introduction to Election Month.

Sudden ballot "drops" will start pouring in during the wee hours. Voters who went to bed watching many Republican candidates with sizable leads will awake to magical Democratic "comebacks."

We will again suffer through early voting, mail-in voting, ranked-choice voting, and majority-only voting. The more who vote, the more we will be warned of "voter suppression" and "election deniers."

"Get out the vote" left-wing, electronically fueled projects like this year's "Mind the Gap" involving Sam Bankman-Fried's family, or Mark Zuckerberg's 2020 $419 million de facto absorption of balloting collection in key precincts, will merely be replaced by new names.

There will be new, even richer virtue-signaling billionaires. But otherwise, the same old Silicon Valley-Wall Street font will vastly out-raise pathetic Republican efforts.

Unfortunately for Americans, the 2024 economy will likely still be wounded by nearly four years of inflation. High-interest rate correctives will still have choked off the housing market.

Unemployment and stagflation will still be termed "transitory." Growth will continue to be slow but dubbed "steady." High gas and energy prices will be near permanent but "coming down." A wide-open border will still be termed "secure." Talk of historic crime rates will still be "racist."

President Joe Biden will still shake imaginary hands, talk of passing legislation through the Congress that he bypassed with executive orders, and still claim gas was $5 a gallon when he entered office. Fact-checkers will ignore all that mythology and still obsess over Republican "lies."

The left-wing nexus will still warn of back-alley abortions that threaten millions of women, of children still likely to die if "Mega-MAGA" voters win, of yet another January 6 in the wings, and of the dangers of "semi-fascist" Trump.

There will be more pre-election October surprises, such as the spurious narrative that the man who assaulted Paul Pelosi - David DePape - was a captive of right-wingers. Who knew that the hemp-jewelry maker, illegal alien, nudist, and resident of a BLM/Pride-flagged commune was supposedly addled by "un-American" Trumpism?

There will also be more post-election, November surprises -- like the mysteriously sudden discovery just days after the voting that Sam Bankman-Fried was a multibillion-dollar con artist and huge Democratic Party donor, and the appointment of special counsel to investigate Trump.

Who would have known that prior to November 8, Trump's Mar-a-Lago presidential papers proved neither "nuclear secrets" nor designed for his personal sale after all?

Yet the only mystery will be why Republicans will still be shocked by deja vu.



Strong-State Federalism Is The Best Path Forward Right Now For The GOP (And The Country)

Arguably, Ron DeSantis has done more good for conservatives as a governor than national Republican leaders have in the past two years.



The 2022 midterms were as much an indictment of bloated national leadership on both sides of the aisle as they were of anything. People didn’t vote overwhelmingly for incumbents because they think the country is headed in a good direction (more than 7 in 10 Americans say it isn’t).

Many Democrats voted for Democrats because they were told Republicans will destroy democracy and practically enslave women. Republicans largely voted for Republicans because they were fed up with the Biden administration’s results, from inflation to transgendering kids. Mainstream Americans have lost faith in Washington — it’s what propelled Trump’s outsider win in 2016 and now what’s materialized in the heels-dug-in results of last week’s election.

None of the GOP Midterm Momentum Was National

The most interesting elements of the midterms weren’t in the fight over control in Congress (no one has much faith in Mitch McConnell, least of all many in his own coalition). They were the elections for state office that saw massive momentum build around longshot Republican challengers from New York to Michigan to even Oregon. Even though GOP gubernatorial candidates in those states didn’t oust their incumbent-party opponents, they tapped into an energy that national Republicans have failed to generate.

In the weeks before the election, Politico observed that gubernatorial candidates were helping to carry their Senate counterparts, from Republican Brian Kemp in Georgia to Democrat Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania. The most momentum anywhere, of course, was behind Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis — who has built his brand on proactive state leadership and pitting his state’s successes against the Biden administration and particularly its Covid bureaucracy.

There was no singular reason for the GOP to flail in the midterms, but the election did make at least these two things clear: The national, establishment GOP has failed to rally behind a resonant, positive national agenda that motivates voters, and it failed to fight effectively enough against the Democrat vote-harvesting machinery that’s been put in place in states that were, until recently, swing states.

Republicans in Congress and especially in leadership have joined with Democrats to pass leftist wishlists, from gun control to gay marriage. Meanwhile, they’ve continued to pump dollars toward GOP consultants while failing to match Democrats’ ground game in elections — perhaps the largest cause of Republicans’ disappointing midterm results.

Arguably, the GOP will either have to reform election laws (banning no-excuse mail-in voting, ballot harvesting and curing, etc.), or match Democrats’ efforts to harvest ballots where it’s legal, before a Republican can hope to win the White House again. If Republicans stand idle while Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Michigan continue to let Democrats abuse election laws to collect more ballots, a Republican nominee will have practically no shot at gaining 270 electoral votes. And strengthening the integrity of elections begins by advancing state-level candidates who will pass and implement strong election laws.

Covid Exposed the Importance of State Governance

Voters also appear to place more hope and enthusiasm in state-level leaders than in Washington. (Donald Trump in 2016 is a clear outlier, but he explicitly ran as the opposite of an “insider” and was more exciting and relatable as a result.) Credit a myriad of factors for DeSantis’s blowout win in Florida earlier this month, but he’s certainly become a model figure for strong state leadership that reminds the federal government: Checks and balances work between states and Washington too.

Covid lockdowns showed voters more clearly than they’d seen in years how critical state governance is. Blue states shuttered church services, stole years of children’s education, and imprisoned nursing home residents, while red states offered freer communities. Many people packed up and moved as a result.

In Virginia and nationwide, scandal after scandal in the classroom awakened many parents to realize how important their local school boards were. Americans learned (or remembered) that local politics — from school boards to governors’ mansions — can affect their daily lives just as much or more than who occupies the White House. While Republicans should still fight for influence in Washington to slow the advance of far-left agenda items and to make progress on breaking up the bureaucratic cartel, the reality of national politics is often gridlock. That’s by design, and a good thing; we call it checks and balances.

Change Comes from Without

But in our current political climate, at least, it also means that Republicans are never going to save the country by winning majorities that put McConnell in charge of the Senate. The most momentous way forward against the excesses of our gargantuan national government right now is from Main Street to 50 different state capitals, not Pennsylvania Avenue.

With respect for the true conservatives doing badly needed maintenance and damage control in Congress, the best way to fix the system is from outside, via steady pressure from states reminding the federal government it can’t boss their citizens around. That’s why, arguably, DeSantis has done more good for conservatives as a governor than national Republican leaders have in the past two years. Imagine if the 26 states that emerged from the midterms with Republican governors were each led by a DeSantis-style Republican who directed coordinating fire at federal powermongers.

Conservative strategists and donors should gear their efforts toward boosting strong state leaders who aren’t afraid to push back against big bureaucracy, big corporate, Big Tech, and big media. That’s not limited to governors: Secretaries of state and attorneys general are vital for administering strong elections and fighting back against federal excesses, respectively. Voters should demand conservative state leaders go to bat for their interests against the Washington machine, not the other way around.

In Federalist No. 45, James Madison wrote:

The State governments may be regarded as constituent and essential parts of the federal government; whilst the latter is nowise essential to the operation or organization of the former. … [E]ach of the principal branches of the federal government will owe its existence more or less to the favor of the State governments, and must consequently feel a dependence [on them]…

Madison argued that dependence was “much more likely to beget a disposition too obsequious than too overbearing” from the federal to state governments. That hope is laughable in our current balance of power.

Even relentless effort from state leaders to reestablish the authority and leverage over the federal government their constituents once had might not be feasible. The divide between red states and blue states that it would deepen might break the country apart. There may not be enough freedom-loving citizens left to vote for reembracing responsibilities long pawned off on federal grifters. But it’s a better bet than ever expecting the rot in Washington to see itself out.




'He Is Nowhere Near 218': A Scenario Is Emerging That Ends With Kevin McCarthy Not Being Elected Speaker of the House


Teri Christoph reporting for RedState 

As Republicans make plans for taking control of the House of Representatives in January, members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus are warning that Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who won the GOP’s nomination for Speaker of the House last week, may not actually have enough votes to earn him the Speaker’s gavel.

Just because he won the Republican nomination doesn’t mean Kevin McCarthy automatically becomes Speaker; he essentially needs the backing of every GOP House member when the entire chamber votes early next year. Here are the numbers:

  • 219: The projected number of seats that Republicans will hold in the new Congress.
  • 218: The number of votes a candidate needs to become Speaker of the House.
  • 188: The number of votes Kevin McCarthy received to earn the GOP nomination to become Speaker of the House.
  • 31: The number of Republicans that did not vote for Kevin McCarthy to be their nominee for Speaker of the House.
  • 30: The number of Republican (or Democrat!) votes Kevin McCarthy needs to earn by January 3, 2023, in order to become the next Speaker of the House.

Freedom Caucus member Andy Biggs (R-AZ) has been one of the most vocal opponents of McCarthy’s ascending to the speakership. He appeared on Dana Loesch’s radio show today and confirmed that McCarthy is short of the votes he needs, tweeting:

Biggs, himself, confirmed to Dana that he is still in the running to become Speaker, having been nominated by fellow Freedom Caucus member Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) last week in a speech ahead of the GOP speaker vote:

“You’re not going to change anything if you keep doing the same stuff. That’s the truth.” “Will Republicans stand for change? Or will Republicans stand up for the continuation of the status quo?” “The status quo ain’t working.”

Roy’s comments are in line with Biggs’ own complaints about House Republicans, led by McCarthy as Minority Leader, failing to take aggressive action on an agenda that excites American voters. As RedState reported last week, Biggs stated:

“… I think Americans want us to actually bring the budget under control, they wanted to secure the border, they want us to just find a way to reduce oil and gas prices, attack inflation, all of that. And you can’t do that by being a passive sideliner or sitting there acquiescing to the Biden administration or trying to get along, you’re going to have to be tough.”

According to The Hill, a “Never Kevin” faction is growing in the GOP ranks, with Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) saying, “The hard thing for Kevin, realistically, is there are a fair number of people who have said very publicly they’re ‘Never Kevin.’ Like, there’s nothing that Kevin can do to get their vote.” This should be very concerning for Kevin McCarthy.

Interestingly, the Speaker of the House does not have to be a sitting member, meaning anyone could, conceivably, be elected. Even former representative Justin Amash, who came out of the woodwork to express his desire to be a “nonpartisan” Speaker of the House:

Kevin McCarthy, who is backed by former president Donald Trump and the recently reelected Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), isn’t likely to create an opening for someone like Amash to be a spoiler. After winning the nomination last week, McCarthy said, “Look, we have our work cut out for us. We’ve got to have a small majority. We’ve got to listen to everybody in our conference.”

In an effort to shore up support in his conference, McCarthy seems to be setting his sights on issues important to the more conservative members of his party. He is vowing, for instance, to “move meetings” to the border “so the Democrats can no longer ignore the problem, so the American public can actually have the information.” A move that certainly seems to align with the Freedom Caucus agenda. And there are sure to be more as he works toward that critical 218 number.

We’ll find out on January 3 if his efforts are successful.




'The View' Mixes in Some Old Fashioned Heresy During Its Usual Ranting


Bonchie reporting for RedState 

Amidst their many supposed talents, apparently, the ladies of “The View” are also theologians now. I know what you are thinking, but take it from Sunny Hostin. She knows exactly what Jesus would do, and she doesn’t even have to wear the armband.

According to Hostin, Jesus, the Savior of the world, would be the “grand marshal at the pride parade” if he hadn’t ascended into Heaven.

There’s nothing quite like starting the day off with some good ole fashioned heresy, and “The View” is in no way an unexpected place to find it. After all, we are talking about the same show that treats the killing of children in the womb as a sacrament and insists there are no moral boundaries whatsoever on essentially any front. So why wouldn’t they go ahead and misrepresent Jesus as some kind of free-wheeling hippie with no moral authority at all?

Seriously, though, this is a common trope trotted out by the left, many of which haven’t seen the inside of a church for something other than a funeral since they were kids. It’s this idea that Christians have Jesus all wrong, and that it’s actually un-Biblical to believe Biblical values. Because if you do, then you are “judging,” and you aren’t supposed to “judge.”

Of course, that’s a complete misreading of scripture and what it means to judge someone. It’s also a complete misrepresentation of Jesus’ interactions with sinners. Yes, he approached with love and kindness in most cases (though, he cracked the whip a time or two, especially dealing with the Pharisees), but he didn’t reinforce sinful behavior. Certainly, he didn’t parade about, celebrating it. Rather, Jesus pushed people to repentance, urging them to leave their old life behind and follow him and his ways.

He didn’t go to the sinner and say “it’s all good, just keep on keeping on.” That doesn’t mean you approach others with hateful judgment. To do so would be sinful in and of itself. But it does mean you speak the truth, whatever it may bring.

Regardless, even if you put aside the arguments over the LGBT agenda and the Church, Jesus also wasn’t much for the whole “pride” thing. In fact, he pretty roundly condemned it. For that reason alone, I’m certain he wouldn’t be interested in leading a “Pride Parade” as Hostin proclaims.

Understand that this is going to continue to happen, though. The left isn’t content with just being left alone. Instead, it wants to completely wreck your belief system, forcing you to bend to its bastardized view of the world. The further we head down that path, the more complicated being a Christian in America is going to get. Everyone should be prepared because things aren’t going to get better.




Special Counsel Investigating Trump Has an Eyebrow-Raising History


Bonchie reporting for RedState 

As RedState reported, former President Donald Trump is in for yet another special counsel investigation, this time centering on his possession of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. The special counsel will also focus on crimes surrounding the events of January 6th, though that mandate appears to be broader than just dealing with the former president.

So who was appointed? His name is Jack Smith, and he currently serves as a war crimes prosecutor for The Hauge, a globalist court that purports to enforce international law. Prior to that, Smith was at the DOJ, and his history at the department is raising eyebrows.

For example, according to Just The News, Smith led the corrupt prosecution of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell. The DOJ went to such absurd lengths to broaden the federal bribery statute to target the Republican politician that the Supreme Court eventually overturned the conviction.

Naturally, because our federal bureaucracies are a joke, Smith was actually rewarded by being made the DOJ’s head of its “public integrity” section. There is no accountability in government. Failing up is not the exception, it’s the rule.

Smith’s problems don’t stop there, though. He also found himself embroiled in the scandal surrounding the IRS targeting conservative groups under former President Barack Obama.

In 2014, the House Oversight Committee concluded that during Smith’s earlier stint at DOJ he set up a critical meeting between his department and IRS official Lois Lerner that set in motion the targeting of conservative nonprofits that became one of the signature scandals of the Obama administration.

The Oversight Committee obtained testimony from a DOJ official named Richard Pilger in 2014 that showed Smith set up a meeting with Lerner to discuss more aggressive enforcement of regulations prohibiting tax-exempt groups from engaging in politics in the aftermath of the landmark Citizens United free speech Supreme Court case.

“According to Mr. Pilger, the Justice Department convened a meeting with former IRS official Lois Lerner in October 2010 to discuss how the IRS could assist in the criminal enforcement of campaign-finance laws against politically active nonprofits,” the committee wrote in a 2014 letter to DOJ. “This meeting was arranged at the direction of Public Integrity Section Chief Jack Smith.”

That “aggressive enforcement” formed the basis of the IRS attacking conservative non-profits for engaging in protected political speech. Again, Smith was never held accountable nor was anyone at the IRS. To this day, the scandal is brushed off as a right-wing obsession despite the agency being forced to admit its wrongdoing.

And yet, people wonder why so many Americans have so little trust in our institutions. It’s because people like Jack Smith, who spend their careers bending the rules, never face any repercussions. Instead, they only continue to advance until they retire and begin to collect their fat public pensions.

There’s no reason to believe Smith will be a fair arbiter while investigating Trump. Many of the same things being said about him (i.e. that he’s a straight shooter) were said about Robert Mueller, and we all saw how that turned out, with Andrew Weissman being allowed to run wild before moving on to becoming a far-left loon on MSNBC.

The right move here was for the DOJ to put up or shut up on charging Trump. If they had the evidence, they were welcome to pull the trigger. If they didn’t have it, then there was no reason to appoint this special counsel unless the point is to engage in another fishing expedition. And what a coincidence that it will drag out well into the 2024 election season, right?




Another Ridiculous Criminal Investigation of Donald Trump Emerges


Bonchie reporting for RedState 

Yet another criminal investigation of Donald Trump is about to kick off. According to The New York Times, the Manhattan district attorney’s office is looking to restart its criminal probe of the former president. That comes on the heels of the Department of Justice announcing a special counsel targeting Trump over his taking of classified documents.

Back in April, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg decided to essentially shutter the investigation into an alleged “hush-money” payment to porn worker Stormy Daniels due to a lack of progress. Two of the office’s top prosecutors working on the case resigned in protest, running to the media to proclaim that Trump was a criminal being let off the hook. It was a stunning mask-off moment, showcasing the lawfare that takes place so often in institutions we are asked to trust.

Apparently, the pressure was just too much, though. Now, that criminal investigation is back on, and prosecutors are searching for ways to send the bad orange man to jail.

The Manhattan district attorney’s office has moved to jump-start its criminal investigation into Donald Trump, according to people with knowledge of the matter, seeking to breathe new life into an inquiry that once seemed to have reached a dead end.

Under the new district attorney, Alvin Bragg, the prosecutors have returned to the long-running investigation’s original focus: a hush-money payment to a porn star who said she had an affair with Trump.

What makes this so insidious is the fact that it’s so obviously a fishing expedition meant to push partisan aims. For years, the DA’s office has been unable to build a case around the hush-money payment. In fact, their case was so weak that they were thinking about relying on a completely unproven legal theory. Bragg booted that idea when he took office. Now, the “zombie theory,” which is apparently what in-office prosecutors call it, is back.

Does this sound like how the legal system is supposed to work?

The idea of building a case around the hush money had resurfaced with such regularity in recent years that prosecutors came to refer to it as the “zombie theory,” an idea that just wouldn’t die, one of the people said.

Under Bragg’s predecessor, the district attorney’s office rejected the idea of focusing a case solely on the hush money, concluding, with the help of outside legal experts, that it would hinge on a largely untested and therefore risky legal theory. And if Bragg were to charge Trump without uncovering any new evidence or relying on a more conventional theory, he would risk having a judge or appellate court throw out the case.

According to the Times, the plan here is to once again try to get Allen Weisselberg to “flip.” In fact, prosecutors are getting ready to bring more charges against the former Trump associate in an unrelated case in order to apply more pressure. Again, does that sound like how a fair and unbiased justice system operates?

I’m not even sure what the criminal allegation is supposed to be here, and I’m not sure the Manhattan DA knows either. The sole motivation appears to be a desperate desire to take down Trump, no matter how legally questionable that pursuit might be. The collective forces of government are flooding the zone to reach that goal.

I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating. If you live in a blue area with a blue district attorney, you need to think about moving. Because if you don’t hold the right political views, whether we are talking about a situation like Trump’s or Kyle Rittenhouse’s, they will try to destroy you. And the full force of government is nothing to play with.




The Case For Booting Adam Schiff From The House Intel Committee

After a four-year reign, California Democrat  Adam Schiff’s days as chair of the House Intelligence Committee are numbered.



After a four-year reign, California Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff’s days as chair of the House Intelligence Committee, marked by abuse and grotesque politicization, are finally numbered. But it’s not just Schiff’s chairmanship headed out the door with the incoming Republican majority; it’s his seat on the committee altogether.

On Sunday, GOP House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy made clear a trio of liberal lawmakers were on the chopping block for their assignments after the chamber took the unprecedented step of dictating minority committee appointments under Democrat rule. Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene was kicked off of her committees just a month after her congressional inauguration.

“Should you become speaker of the House in January, what are you going to do in terms of these Democrats that you have on such important committees?” asked Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo on Sunday. “You’ve talked in the past about removing Ilhan Omar, you’ve talked about removing Adam Schiff, about Eric Swalwell. Will you deliver?”

In January, McCarthy told Breitbart News each would be removed from their respective positions on the Intelligence Committee and Foreign Affairs Committee if he were elected speaker with a Republican majority.

“I’ll keep that promise,” McCarthy told Bartiromo. McCarthy had already been calling for Swalwell’s resignation from the House Intelligence Committee since details surfaced of the Democrat’s close relationship with a since-vanished Chinese spy.

“Eric Swalwell cannot get a security clearance in the public sector,” McCarthy said Sunday. “Why would we ever give him a security clearance and the secrets to America?”

“Adam Schiff, who had lied to the American public time and again, we will not allow him to be on the Intel Committee either,” McCarthy added.

Schiff’s Rise from Russia

Schiff was appointed ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee six months before Donald Trump descended on the golden escalator in 2015. By the time Trump captured the White House, Schiff had become the Democrats’ point man on their prime conspiracy to take down the president and undermine democracy in the form of the Russia hoax. In fact, Schiff was the original Russia hoaxer who claimed repeatedly for years to have evidence that Trump colluded with Russia.

Schiff used his perch on the Intelligence Committee to foment fear that the new Republican president was in fact a Russian agent who colluded with the Kremlin for command of the Oval Office. He did so through leaks and testimony to the media which published claims unchecked, making Schiff’s office an apparent ground zero for the false and damaging narrative of Russian collusion.

In March 2017, Schiff said on MSNBC “there is more than circumstantial evidence” that Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russian government. Two months later, the Justice Department appointed a special counsel investigation to probe whether Trump was indeed guilty of collusion. The two-year investigation run with unlimited resources would eventually come up short of finding one person on the Trump campaign, let alone Trump himself, that colluded with the Kremlin. Schiff responded to Trump’s exoneration by castigating House Republicans and foreshadowing more to emerge that would implicate Trump in an apparent crime.

“In the coming weeks and months, new information will continue to be exposed through enterprising journalism, indictments by the Special Counsel, or continued investigative work by Committee Democrats and our counterparts in the Senate,” Schiff said in a press release. “And each time this new information becomes public, Republicans will be held accountable for abandoning a critical investigation of such vital national importance.”

Schiff was right on the money when he claimed more would emerge surrounding the politicized investigations of President Trump, but it’s not Republicans who would end up requiring accountability.

Subsequent revelations from courtrooms, The Federalist’s reporting, and the DOJ inspector general would find gross misconduct by the FBI as deep state actors themselves worked in cahoots with Russian operatives to undermine a presidential administration. The FBI even paid for Russian disinformation to frame President Trump.

[READThink The FBI Deserves The Benefit Of The Doubt? This Laundry List Of Corruption Should Make You Think Again]

As a 2019 report from the DOJ inspector general showed, Schiff himself had been lying about Russian collusion since the inception of the hoax. Booting Schiff from his gig as chairman of the Intelligence Committee is just the start of said accountability. Cutting his time short on the committee altogether is the bare minimum.

From Russia to Ukraine

Once the Democrats’ collusion narrative collapsed under its own weight, despite being bolstered by the Beltway press corps, government bureaucrats, and lawmakers from both parties on Capitol Hill, Schiff took the lead role in amplifying another fabricated scandal to accomplish the top item of their policy agenda: President Trump’s impeachment.

In 2019, Schiff became chair of the Intelligence Committee when Democrats reclaimed the House majority. By the fall, Democrats drew articles of impeachment to indict Trump on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress with claims the president illegally harnessed U.S. military aid to extract concessions from the corrupt foreign government in Ukraine. Trump, the story went, withheld $400 million in military aid from Ukraine until President Volodymyr Zelensky pledged to investigate his own country’s role in the Russia hoax which did irreparable harm to the United States. That investigation would inevitably center around Hunter Biden, son of now-President Joe Biden, who raked in tens of thousands of dollars in excess compensation for a seat on the board of a Ukrainian energy company despite no prior industry experience.

Schiff presided over the House impeachment hearings as if withholding hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars in foreign aid until its recipients act in American interests was even a bad thing, let alone worthy of impeachment. As chair, Schiff’s deposition hearings were held behind closed doors while the committee selectively leaked snippets of testimony to amplify their own narratives to a complicit press. In fact, leaking on the Intelligence Committee became a favorite practice of the congressman, whose habitual leaks made their way uncritically into the pages of The New York Times.

When he wasn’t leaking to the allied press machine, Schiff was making up his own evidence to promote the Democrats’ fabricated narratives. In September 2019, Schiff created his own transcript of the phone call between Trump and Zelensky which was supposed to be the smoking gun that warranted impeachment. In his own rendition, Schiff framed Trump as someone demanding a favor the president never actually requested, but he offered the media a storyline the press ran with, slicing and dicing Trump’s words to fit the pro-impeachment narrative.

Over the course of the first Trump impeachment saga, Schiff also flip-flopped on demanding testimony from the whistleblower who reported details of the presidential phone call to Schiff’s office on Capitol Hill.

“We’re in touch with counsel and look forward to the whistleblower’s testimony as soon as this week,” Schiff wrote in a Sept. 24, 2019 tweet. In fact, Schiff demanded the whistleblower’s testimony repeatedly until details became public that the whistleblower had coordinated with the California lawmaker, in discussions that were omitted from the official whistleblower process. It was then that Schiff moved to prevent testimony.

Schiff went on to be an impeachment manager litigating the case for Trump’s removal in the upper chamber. Trump was ultimately acquitted of all charges by the Senate, only to be impeached again a year later in a circus trial over the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021.

Schiff Is a J6 Hoaxer

Schiff has remained laser-focused on Trump’s criminal conviction even after the president left office. True to form, the California Democrat and member of the Select Committee on Jan. 6 went on CNN in June as the panel proceeded with summer show trials to foreshadow evidence of culpability that never came.

“We’ll show evidence of the President’s involvement in this scheme,” Schiff said, presumably in reference to the plans Trump openly supported to halt certification of the Electoral College votes on Jan. 6, 2021, as if it were a cover-up for something illegal. (Never mind that Democrats objected to certification in 2001, 2005, and 2017.) Schiff refused to reveal his “evidence,” however, because he didn’t “want to get ahead” of the upcoming hearing.

It was routine commentary from the California congressman who has been at the center of practically every fabricated scandal against President Trump since the pair began to emerge into the national spotlight in 2015. Schiff’s work on the Jan. 6 probe, which wrapped up its hearings this fall with nothing to show, highlights the dishonesty of his tenure.

In December, Schiff doctored text messages between GOP Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan and former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. Schiff manipulated messages presented at an official hearing to expose “a lawmaker” pressing the vice president to unilaterally deny certification of the electoral college votes as unconstitutional. The message, however, actually came from Washington attorney and former Department of Defense Inspector General Joseph Schmitz, and was merely forwarded by the Ohio congressman.

The message, which Schiff took out of context with added punctuation to make it appear complete and illustrated with a cooked-up graphic, was part of a four-page document that outlined Schmitz’s legal arguments for Vice President Mike Pence’s authority to object to electoral certification from a handful of states. The document was published publicly ahead of Jan. 6 on everylegalvote.com.

The Jan. 6 Committee even conceded that Schiff’s messages were manipulated.

McCarthy isn’t just within his rights as speaker to kick Schiff from the Intelligence Committee, but it would be irresponsible not to.