Monday, November 21, 2022

For the Left, Politics Is a Full-Time Job

The Right has an overly restrictive view of politics. 
But for the Left, politics occupies the same place that religion does for most people.


The midterm results were surprising. Dismal economic conditions and widespread public sentiment suggested a wave, and the Republicans did get more votes, but they barely won the House and failed to carry the Senate. There are reasons for all of this, including Democrat-friendly election procedures, but it is still very disappointing. 

Republicans like to think of politics as something you do every few years in the same manner as nominal Christians who go to church on Christmas and Easter. When it comes to politics, the Left are the fundamentalists. For them, it is full-time, dictating what needs to happen with everything and everyone, everywhere.

Leftism Invades Every Sphere

This is why so many things we now call politicized are just alternate facets of the leftist propaganda apparatus. Every business, every school, every pharmaceutical product, every TV show, every movie, and every interaction reflects the leftist value system. Those fat, sloppy mannequins now at the mall are there for a reason. Think of the choices behind shows like “Modern Family, “Will and Grace,” and now “nonbinary” Transformers. Think of how rare it is to see a couple in an advertisement that is not mixed race. 

None of this is accidental. None of this is apolitical. None of this involves an election. 

Gillette lost tons of customers a few years ago with an advertisement, ostensibly selling razor blades, that basically mocked and insulted their core customers. These trends continue, because the decision-makers in the business world are first filtered through the campus because of mandatory degree requirements. Profits are becoming secondary to those so indoctrinated. They aren’t selling burgers or grooming products, they’re selling salvation and religion. 

While Republicans strategize about economics, public policy, candidate quality, mail-in voting systems, and a host of other policy issues, the Left is busy doing real politics in schoolswith your kidsat the borderon the TV, and within the military

This is why there is such a significant skew towards the Left among young people. From what they learn in school to what they absorb on TikTok, they are fully immersed in a steady stream of heavy-handed propaganda. The relentless messaging has an impact. 

In the recent midterm, two-thirds of Gen Z voted for Democrats. But with regard to their lifestyles, the results are even more dramatic. In one study, a total of 40 percent of Gen Z say they are LGBT. Over 1 percent claim to be transsexuals (300 percent higher than older cohorts). For Gen Z, 27 percent do not want kids, and more than half say they are not patriotic.

Urban, childless, unmarried, indebted, brain-dead people are ideal consumers and ideal activists. Simply by living this lifestyle, they are laying the groundwork to make themselves loyal servants of the unified financial-political-technological system, permanently agnostic about the future and hostile to the past. 

Aloof Conservatism Will Conserve Nothing

Normie conservatives are loath to talk about this. They consider noticing replacement immigration or socially engineered voting demographics to be déclassé and divisive. They think of themselves as above it all, dismissing campus antics as something people grow out of as they mature. 

Regarding indoctrination, many consider worries about television and media to be alarmist, akin to the adults fretting about heavy metal or comic books when they were young. But this is simply wishful thinking, as those mild forms of teenage rebellion did not, generally speaking, act in the service of a worldview shared by everyone from George Soros to your local community college professor. 

Wishful thinking is not a strategy. The world is changing, and it is changing according to a plan. One side is conducting its “march through the institutions,” and the other side is mostly asleep, assuming their gated communities, pockets of normalcy, and occasional electoral victory will be allowed to continue

The Left Is a Religion on a Crusade

The Right has an overly restrictive view of politics. For the Left, politics occupies a different place in their mental and spiritual landscape, the same place that religion does for most people. 

What is religion? For most, it’s a grand unifying philosophy that ties the present to the past and the future, including the afterlife. It provides moral rules and ideals and lends deeper meaning to what otherwise would be a mundane existence. It provides structure and spiritual sustenance during difficult times.

American conservatives believe in a limited politics. For us, the goal of political life is to create space and security for commerce, family life, private pursuits, and actual religion. Thus, conservative politics is prosaic, limited in scope, and rooted in a deep recognition of fallible man living in a fallen world. In short, it is fundamentally humble.

For the Left, by contrast, politics is the main event. It’s a high-minded affair that aims, ultimately, to eliminate injustice and save the world. It proposes to do this by transforming humanity into a superior kind of being through superior political conditions and indoctrination into correct beliefs. The end state is one where we are supposed to be less tribal, less selfish, and more equal. The Left’s obsession with healthcare and vaccinations suggests we may transcend death itself, given enough technology and resources. 

The idiom of leftist politics is analogous to that of the not-quite-conservative, puritan faction on the American Right. Both aim to purify a fallen and sinful world, and thus employ politics to encroach upon realms that otherwise have their own unplanned trajectories: private opinion, business, art, music, food, courtship, family life, and religion itself. 

Whether one likes it or not, the enemy has a vote, and the enemy sometimes gets to choose the terrain on which battle is conducted. The Right can no longer afford to ignore the schools, the boardroom, the doctor’s office, or movies, music, and social media. While some thought we were dealing with distinct spheres with distinct logic—commerce or education or medicine or entertainment—the Left has decided that in every area we are dealing with politics. We must do politics that way too.

What this means in practical terms has to be worked out. For starters, it requires awareness. Worries about being “divisive” or condemnations of “identity politics” prevent us from staking out territory and conducting our own identity politics. Consider how so many on the Right still want to give corporate America a pass, as if these mercantilist behemoths are our allies or have anything in common with small, entrepreneurial businesses. The Right needs to get comfortable with rewarding its friends and punishing its enemies. The Right needs either to destroy, coopt, starve, or frustrate institutions in the hands of the enemy or build parallel institutions of its own when that proves impossible. 

Too many on the Right “want to grill” and ignore the gathering storm. Lost and disappointing elections should concern us, but only because they reveal that one avenue of politics may not be available. Even with such losses, and even if such losses continue into the indefinite future, we still have some power in how we live, where we shop, what we read and watch, and whom we choose to associate and organize with. 

We can still be dissidents. We can still resist. This also is politics. Today, everything is.




Christian Patriot News, On the Fringe, and more- Nov 21

 



Got a surprise for all of you down below: 1 of the videos below is NOT a podcast! In fact, it's a brand new trailer for a much anticipated new holiday movie that premieres THIS Sunday! Hope you enjoy it!

Here's tonight's news:


The Case For Ron DeSantis 2024


The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent this site.

It’s going to be King Kong vs. Godzilla and, while a few pipsqueak Rodan's might be flapping around (Hi Mike Pence), this bout is the battle royale. The 2024 primary will be Donald Trump v. Ron DeSantis. Everyone else is barely relevant – can you feel the Larry Hoganmania?

Not unless you are Larry Hogan or one of the 1% of Republicans eager to set fire to stacks of Never Trump donor dollars.

Back in June, I wrote, “The Case For Donald Trump 2024” (I followed that up with “The Case Against Donald Trump,” just as this Thursday I will offer “The Case Against Ron DeSantis”). My goal was not to provide some panegyric to the then-potential candidate but to objectively assess his strengths and his weaknesses. We must be cold-eyed and ruthless in our candidate analysis – 2024 is too important to risk by following our hearts and embracing tired clichés. We cannot exploit strengths we have not specified, and we cannot mitigate weaknesses we have not identified. 2024 is the whole enchilada, and it is too important to play it by ear. We must be strategic, and we must select the candidate most likely to win in the general. That means assessing both good points and bad points. And we must undertake the process for Donald Trump as well as his number one competitor.

And Ron DeSantis is Trump’s number one competitor precisely because of his greatest strength – competence. Not just competence in running his dinosaur-ridden state but in turning it bright red and annihilating the competition. “Competence” is going to be the watchword in 2024, along with “normality.” People want to go back to “normal,” which some think of as American life before the drama that began when Donald Trump came down the escalator (note that these people do not necessarily see Trump as the cause of the abnormality; his rise is seen by many as a reaction to the abnormality). But many of us older folks see “normal” as the America we grew up in, before 9/11 and the 2000 election (an election that was A-OK to deny because of reasons and shut up you transphobe). We want a prosperous America and an America that is not constantly in turmoil and at war, facing alleged (and not-so-alleged) existential threats from outside and within. We want an America where weird perversions are not declared awesome and where those of us who oppose groomers waving their tu-tu-clad man-butts in the faces of kindergarteners are not declared dangerous terrorist bigots. We would prefer a country where mean tweets don’t happen because they are not necessary since the ruling caste is functioning and not in need of radical push-back.

Competence goes with normality. It is the ability to perform one’s job with a high level of skill, and Ron DeSantis has done that as governor. His state is secure and prosperous. His handling of Hurricane Ian was stellar. The storm response was planned and executed flawlessly, so flawlessly that once the wind died down you never heard about it again. And what you did not hear, if you did not live there, was how the power came back fast and how bridges got rebuilt in days. You would have heard all about it if those things didn’t happen. Now, especially if they live in a hellhole like California, people look at the construction jobs that clog the freeways for months or years and they know that it does not have to be this way.

Ron DeSantis checks the most important box – he can do the job of the president if elected, though that desiccated old pervert in the Oval Office has set the bar so low that a mediocre hamster could do it better.

Then there are the intangibles. DeSantis is a fighter, and we’re not in the mood for another so-called gentleman who loses then turns on us and talks smack about us to his country club cronies. The Florida governor is a political honey-badger. He does not care. The garbage media attacks him and he either ignores it (which drives it nuts) or pushes back. What he does not do is give a damn about what they say – why should he? He’s got results. But it is more than just treating the regime media like the steaming cesspool that it is. It is understood that it is a steaming cesspool. For DeSantis, this is not a pose that he fakes for the rubes. It’s real. He thinks the media is scum. He does not secretly long for its acceptance or approval. He will never have long talks with Maggie Haberman. He doesn’t give a Schiff who Maggie Haberman is.

That’s key. Ron DeSantis knows what time it is. He is based. This means that at a foundational level, he understands that we are in the midst of an existential cultural/political struggle with people who want to disenfranchise, enslave, or even destroy us. The left does not want to be our friend. It wants to be our master. The bad guys are serious about winning, and so is Ron DeSantis.

This translates into a willingness to take on the enemy, but also to pick fights that he can win instead of spraying and praying venom and hoping it sort of all works out. Look at the Disney fight. He correctly assessed that his opponent was a paper mouse. Disney was big and deeply embedded in Florida culture, so deeply that it felt it could bully the state into accepting its bizarre gender/woke nonsense. And some Republicans were afraid. But DeSantis correctly determined that Disney’s huge Florida footprint was not a strength but a weakness. Disney had not trapped Florida; Disney was trapped in Florida. Disney World is not moving to blue Massachusetts anytime soon. It could not generate the political muscle to stop DeSantis from taking it down a peg or a dozen. Disney folded, and DeSantis became a hero not just for resisting corporate wokeness but for showing that Republicans need not – in fact, better not – keep sucking up to big corporations at the expense of normal voters.

All the policy and all the owning of the libs is useless Toobin Zooming if you cannot get the votes. DeSantis gets the votes. He’s a solid candidate with a solid resume – Navy, lawyer, and congressman in the Freedom Caucus. He’s personally inoffensive – he does not turn off normal people. Libs, yes, but they called everyone since Reagan “Hitler” so they don’t count. He has improved markedly as a speaker and knows how to motivate a crowd. He is also not stiff. I met him in person one time, being introduced as “Colonel,” and said, “Hi governor, the Navy sucks.” He laughed at my interservice ribbing. You need to be thick-skinned in this game, and he is.

Governor DeSantis has a nice family and his wife Casey is a real asset. DeSantis can raise serious money, and big donors like him. He is also appropriately ruthless when it comes to such basics as gerrymandering and reforming election systems. His work fixing the hanging chad stage’s disastrous election system earned him some more competence kudos during the Red Squirt, where Florida finished counting votes before California and Arizona managed to get their pants on.

Ron DeSantis also appeals across political and ethnic lines. He won in the big cities, which is unheard of for a Republican. He also won Hispanic voters. Now, let’s not fall into the liberal trap of thinking all Hispanics are identical – Cubans are not Mexicans are not Venezuelans are not Hondurans – but DeSantis went after these votes and won them. That is huge.

And GOP voters generally like him. The ridiculously early polls are showing that the voters’ interest is at least piqued, and he is certainly in the game. Some state polls even show him leading Trump – he is viewed as Trump sans baggage. As people pay attention, they are likely to come around in increasing numbers. 

And, finally, Ron DeSantis is disciplined. You can be smart and you can be savvy, but if you are undisciplined you are going to have problems. DeSantis is scarily disciplined. Trump taunted him and he did not return fire (at least not directly – he’s still at the letting his results speak for themselves stage). He just keeps moving forward, building the best political team in the business, and demanding performance. If he runs, you will find out when he is good and ready and when the announcement will have the maximum impact. Until then, you will get nothing about 2024 from him or his people; he will go on running the freest state in the union. His unspoken offer will be: “All America can be Florida if you vote for me.” And America might do that.

One thing is clear – Ron DeSantis respects Trump, but he is not afraid of Trump. And if Trump wants to be president, he has fights on his hands.




Why Is The Government Arming More Federal Bureaucrats Than US Marines?

The idea that agencies are empowered to effectively create their own laws and go out and enforce them with armed federal agents should be alarming.



When Congress authorized $80 billion this year to beef up Internal Revenue Service enforcement and staffing, Republican House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy warned that “Democrats’ new army of 87,000 IRS agents will be coming for you.”

A video quickly went viral racking up millions of views, purporting to show a bunch of clumsy bureaucrats receiving firearms training, prompting alarm that the IRS would be engaged in military-style raids of taxpayers. The GOP claims were widely attacked as exaggerations — since the video, though from the IRS, didn’t show official agent training — but the criticism has shed light on a growing trend: the rapid arming of the federal government.

A report issued last year by the watchdog group Open The Books, “The Militarization of The U.S. Executive Agencies,” found that more than 200,000 federal bureaucrats now have been granted the authority to carry guns and make arrests — more than the 186,000 Americans serving in the U.S. Marine Corps. “One hundred three executive agencies outside of the Department of Defense spent $2.7 billion on guns, ammunition, and military-style equipment between fiscal years 2006 and 2019 (inflation adjusted),” notes the report. “Nearly $1 billion ($944.9 million) was spent between fiscal years 2015 and 2019 alone.”

The watchdog reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has 1,300 guns including one shotgun, five submachine guns, and 189 automatic firearms. NASA has its own fully outfitted SWAT team, with all the attendant weaponry, including armored vehicles, submachine guns, and breeching shotguns. The Environmental Protection Agency has purchased drones, GPS trackers, radar equipment, and night vision goggles, and stockpiled firearms.

2018 Government Accountability Office report noted that the IRS had 4,487 guns and 5,062,006 rounds of ammunition in inventory at the end of 2017 — before the enforcement funding boost this year. The IRS did not respond to requests for information, though the IRS’s Criminal Investigation division does put out an annual report detailing basic information such as how many warrants the agency is executing in a given year.

More than a hundred executive agencies have armed investigators, and apparently no independent authority is monitoring or tracking the use of force across the federal government. Agencies contacted by RealClearInvestigations from HHS to EPA declined to provide, or said they did not have, comprehensive statistics on how often their firearms are used, or details on how they conduct armed operations.

“I would be amazed if that data exists in any way,” said Trevor Burrus, a research fellow in constitutional and criminal law at the libertarian Cato Institute. “Over the years of working on this, it’s quite shocking how much they try to not have their stuff tracked on any level.”

All this weaponry raises questions about whether the 200,000 armed federal agents are getting adequate weapons and safety training. HHS did not respond to a request for comment on the $14 million in guns, ammunition, and military equipment it purchased between 2015 and 2019 or its new National Training Operations Center within the Washington, D.C. Beltway. Another government agency — Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers — also declined to speak with RCI for this article.

According to Burrus, recent history helps explain the militarization of the federal government. “This is 20 years of the war on terror, with the production of an excessive amount of access to weaponry,” he says.

The Homeland Security Act of 2002 extended law enforcement authority to special agents of 24 Offices of Inspectors General in agencies throughout the government, with provisions to enable other OIGs to qualify for law enforcement authority. As a result, even obscure agencies such as the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board’s Office of Inspector General now have armed federal agents. This summer, before the expansion of the IRS was approved by Congress, Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz singled out the RRB as an example of the excesses of an armed bureaucracy. He introduced a bill to stop federal agencies from stockpiling ammunition.

Federal agencies doing their own criminal investigations raises important constitutional and civil rights questions. Last year, the EPA raided a number of small auto shops across the country for allegedly selling equipment that helped car owners circumvent emissions regulations.

“It was 12 armed federal agents, and they had little EPA badges on and everything,” John Lund, the owner of Lund Racing in West Chester, Pennsylvania, told the Washington Examiner. The EPA did not respond to a request for comment.

While it’s hardly a new complaint that federal bureaucracies are overstepping their rulemaking authority, the idea that executive agencies are broadly empowered to effectively create their own laws and go out and enforce them with armed federal agents is another matter.

“So many of the regulations that can be enforced at the point of a gun have almost nothing to do with what people would normally call dangerous crime, that would be the kind of thing where you might want armed agents there,” said Burrus. “And especially coming from agencies such as the EPA and other agencies that are more quality-of-life agencies dealing with regulatory infractions, rather than involved in solving real crimes.”




Jen Psaki's Weak Attempt to Avoid Subpoena Gets Mocked


Bonchie reporting for RedState 

You’ve probably noticed by now that the goalposts are constantly moving when it comes to our governmental system. To give one example, when the president is a Democrat, it’s the Republican House that is responsible for government shutdowns. Of course, when the president is a Republican, it’s the president that is responsible for government shutdowns because they refused to accept whatever excrement sandwich the Democrat House sent over. Neat trick, right?

The same applies to investigations of corruption. When Democrats hold the levers of power, they love subpoenas. In fact, subpoenas are sacrosanct and must be obeyed, lest the DOJ enforce previously unenforced laws to make sure they are obeyed. But when the shoe goes on the other foot, everything changes.

Enter Jen Psaki, a formerly great respecter of subpoenas, who once lectured the nation on the Trump administration being the only one in modern history to not possess executive privilege. As RedState previously reported, Psaki is facing a subpoena in a lawsuit charging that she and other government officials coordinated with social media companies to suppress information. Now, a judge has “openly scoffed” at her weak attempt to avoid it.

That comes via Jazz Shaw over at Hot Air.

A federal magistrate judge in Virginia openly scoffed Friday at White House press secretary Jen Psaki’s efforts to escape a deposition in a suit over alleged pressure on social media firms to censor posts on topics like Covid-19 vaccines and election fraud.

The request is being sent back to a court in Louisiana where Psaki will likely face a final defeat in her quest to stop the consequences sitting on her doorstep. What makes the situation outright comedic, though, is the reason she gave to try to avoid the subpoena. According to Shaw, Psaki believes that it would be an “undue burden” for her to be deposed in the lawsuit…because she works for MSNBC and has kids.

I mean, I’m not a lawyer, but I’m not sure it’s viable to try to skip out on a subpoena because you might have to miss a day of work. I’m also pretty sure people with kids and jobs aren’t usually allowed to avoid lawsuits they are named in, just because they don’t want to travel. Yet, here we are, with one of the main pushers of “accountability” while she was in Washington wanting to avoid accountability. What a shocker.

Let’s hope this lawsuit goes somewhere. Attempts to quash have been defeated at every turn to this point, and it’s important those that who possibly violated the rights of Americans by proxy are held accountable in some way.




Polling Contradicts Negative Nancy Narrative on the GOP House


Bonchie reporting for RedState 

One of the biggest oddities of the last election wasn’t that the polling was way off, leading to a surprise Republican victory. Instead, it was that the polling was largely correct, leading to a surprise Republican disappointment.

Contrary to the impression most have of how the last mid-terms went, something of a red wave did appear. It just happened to be the most inefficient, badly spaced-out red wave in modern history, with Republicans winning the national popular vote for a few percentage points, just as the generic ballot polling average predicted.

The failure in expectations (and to be sure, overall, the election was a disaster for Republicans) came elsewhere. Namely, the extremely complicated dynamics of individual districts that not even the GOP’s most well-paid analysts were able to crack. That’s a really long way of saying that outright dismissing polling probably isn’t the best idea, and a new poll is out countering the negative Nancy narrative surrounding the incoming Republican House of Representatives.

Take this as an example of what I’m talking about.

Likewise, Ben Shapiro and other conservative commentators also questioned the wisdom of the GOP caucus announcing a series of investigations, many of which they have been promising for years. Well, here’s the counter to that.

Here’s the thing. The idea that the public punishes parties for investigating the other party just isn’t backed by evidence. Often, Bill Clinton’s impeachment is brought up, but that occurred in December of 1998. Who won the next election? That would be the Republicans. Trek forward to the period before the 2016 election when the Benghazi investigation was going on, targeting Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Who won the next election? That would be the Republicans.

This works both ways. During the first two years of the Trump administration, the Democrats went gangbusters with investigations into the then-current president. Who won the next election? That would be Democrats. We could keep playing this out all the way until the 2022 election, where Democrats well over-performed expectations despite spending all their time promoting the January 6th committee.

In short, there is no reason to believe that the GOP House actually respecting its base enough to keep its promises on investigating Hunter Biden is somehow going to cost them the 2024 election. Quite the contrary, especially if the investigation produces valuable information showing the Biden family’s corruption. The Harvard/Harris poll posted above bolsters that assertion, with large majorities thirsty for actual accountability in Washington.

Yes, there will be time to talk about tax cuts and healthcare. It’s important Republicans lay out solid agendas on a variety of meat and potatoes topics prior to the next election. But the existence of those topics should not preclude doing the only real thing the GOP has the power to do right now, which is to investigate the malfeasance of many in the Democrat Party. It’s not just about turn about being fair play, though that’s a part of it. It’s about doing what’s right, and if Republicans take that path, I believe they’ll be helped more than harmed by it. It’s a good thing to do what you said you were going to do.




Democrat Confirms Intent to Transfer Materials to Special Counsel During Lame Duck for Targeting of Republicans


If you doubted the intent of the primary function of the appointment for Special Counsel John Smith, you can put that doubt to rest now.  Appearing on CBS FtN Democrat Rep Zoe Lofgren confirms the intent of the Garland appointment is to receive evidence from the J6 Committee and utilize that evidence in the targeting operation against Republicans in congress.

Read the carefully worded statements from Lofgren and compare them to the background we previously outlined.  Everything is clear.  WATCH:


Primary goal, create enough of a legal mess as to obstruct any republican legislative effort against the Biden White House.  Additionally, if Smith’s DC team can pick-off a few republican House members under charges of “supporting an insurrection“, the political power will revert back to the Democrats in office.

They didn’t just think this up overnight.

This is why the January 6 committee never ended.  They are using J6 as a weapon against their losing the House to republicans.  The Democrats are now structurally targeting Republicans with the appointment of Jack Smith.  It’s actually a brilliant move.  The executive is now investigating the legislative branch; the legal structure of this eliminates the separation of powers issue.

The DOJ is not investigating republicans, they are investigating defined criminals; insurrectionists that are national security threats, that happen to be republicans.  See how that works?

[Transcript] – MARGARET BRENNAN: We turn now to California Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren. She serves on the Judiciary Committee and the Select Committee investigating January 6. Good morning to you, Congresswoman. I want to get straight to it. Does the refusal of the Vice President and the former president to comply with your investigation in any way impede the impact or outcome?

REP. ZOE LOFGREN: Well, we wish they had come in. Certainly other Presidents have come in when asked by the Congress, including Gerald Ford, Teddy Roosevelt, many others. It is almost Thanksgiving, and the committee turns into a pumpkin at the end of December. So we don’t have time to litigate this. But I think they’ve cheated history. And they should have done otherwise. We, on the other hand, have received substantial information from other sources. And we’re in the process of, as I’m sure you know, writing our report now, and —

MARGARET BRENNAN: You’re continuing to gather information, as I understand it, speaking to two Secret Service officials recently. What more do you need? And are you still sharing that information with the Justice Department?

LOFGREN: Well, we’re not sharing information with the Justice Department. We’re doing our own investigation. However, we anticipate when our report is released, to release all of the evidence that we have assembled so the public can see it, including the Department of Justice.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, what do you have? I understand the committee has released documents to the Department of Justice, is that not the case?

LOFGREN: Well, we’re not – we’re no, we’re, we’re, we’re doing our own investigation.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.

LOFGREN: And within a month, they – the public will have everything that we’ve found, all the evidence. For good or ill. And I think we’ve, as we’ve shown in our hearings, made a compelling presentation, that the former president was at the center of the effort to overturn a duly elected election, assembled the mob, sent it over to Congress to try and interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. It’s pretty shocking.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, as we know, the Justice Department has its own investigation. And that’s what led us to the Attorney General making news just a few days ago with this special counsel to take up the events surrounding January 6. But what does putting this in the hands of a Special Counsel accomplish here? Do you think it actually removes politics? Or does it still just keep it there since the Attorney General will still have oversight of the special counsel?

LOFGREN: Well, I think from what the Attorney General said he sought to depoliticize this investigation. Obviously, career professionals are doing it and to have a special counsel overseeing it. But you know, the right wing never fails, up is down and down is up. The effort to depoliticize they are now criticizing is somehow a political measure. So, you know, the effort to say segregated the investigation from the Attorney General himself, is in the eye of the beholder. And of course, the former president is saying he won’t partake as if you know, it’s a – it’s a slice of pizza. I mean, it’s not up to him. He is being investigated for these offenses, and we’ll see what they find.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You sit on the Judiciary Committee, you just heard Rod Rosenstein say that he thinks the US Attorney in Delaware is sufficient in terms of being able to independently decide on what to do with Hunter Biden and that case. I wonder if you agree with that, or if you think your Republican colleagues are right to ask for a special counsel to deal with the current president’s son?

LOFGREN: Well, I don’t know anything about that case. Certainly, in the case of –

MARGARET BRENNAN: But you do have oversight of the Justice Department?

LOFGREN: Yeah. Yes, but we don’t, you know, I served with Mike Pence on the Judiciary Committee. We don’t oversee and interfere with individual investigations in cases. That would be improper in terms of oversight. You know, if if the president’s son has committed offenses, then, you know, there’ll be a judgment on whether to prosecute or not, and that’s the rule of law. Just as the rule of law applies to the former president, people in this country have to adhere to the law. And, you know, if you don’t, if you commit an offense and the facts are there, then there’ll be a prosecution. And that’s what it’s about living in a country where the rule of law, not just politics, leads us. That’s about our democratic republic.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, the issue of what to do with Hunter Biden will come before your committee as the chair – the incoming chair of it has said along with the head of oversight, they want to lead investigations.

LOFGREN: There’s nothing – no role for the legislative body and a prosecution.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Understood, but are you prepared as Democrats for this knife fight?

LOFGREN: Well, I mean, we’re going to be there and the incoming Judiciary Committee Chair has a history of playing fast and loose with the truth. We’re aware of that. And we will be there as truth-sayers.

MARGARET BRENNAN: We will be watching Congresswoman. Thank you.

[End Transcript]

The overarching Lawfare framework has been transparently created by President Obama’s former White House Legal Counsel and current U.S. Asst Attorney General Lisa Monaco.

In essence, the J6 investigation – with an emphasis on congress – transfers to Special Counsel Jack Smith:

The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the ongoing investigation into whether any person or entity violated the law in connection with efforts to interfere with the lawful transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election or the certification of the Electoral College vote held on or about January 6, 2021, as well as any matters that arose or might arise directly from this investigation or that are within the scope of [Special Counsel Regulations 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)]. (pdf)

This is an extension of the January 6th Committee special investigation that transfers the committee’s investigative findings, ie phone records, text messages, transcripts, emails, prior testimony and all evidentiary records, into the newly appointed Special Counsel.

However, all prior and current DOJ prosecutions against citizen individuals will remain within the control and direction of Main Justice.  This structure frees up Jack Smith to target the new republican controlled congressional members, their staff, families and/or communication network.   Main Justice keeps focus on the citizen insurrectionists, Jack Smith now appointed to go after the public officials.

J6 Committee staff, committee investigators, FBI agents and DOJ lawyers will now transfer from the committee to the special counsel office.

As you can see from the simple (non-pretending) explanation of what is being done, the Lawfare process becomes clear.

Everything a republican congress now begins to question falls under the protective blanket of an “ongoing investigation,” exactly as we predicted.  Plus, you get the additional Lawfare elements of congressional leadership under investigation which provides an entirely new ‘conflict of interest dynamic’ to the political equation.

Then you have the congressional representatives under investigation and search warrants on their phones, text messages, emails, etc…. AND the added benefit of using DOJ-NSD defined terms of “national security threat” (that’s why they emphasized insurrection) to gain FISA warrants on an entire incoming congressional delegation.

How slick is that? 

All of the congressional J6 and DOJ main justice teams will now assemble in new DC offices to set up the 2023 targeting operation.  The announcement was made a few days ago, but the planning of the construct has been in place for months, contingent upon the number of actual House seats that could flip.  The Lawfare design is transparent when you stop looking at the obfuscation reporting from mainstream media.

Think of it like the legal ideology of the United Nations (democracy as defined by progressives) prosecuting members of the United States government for acts of rebellion under the framework of a constitutional republican form of government they abhor.  That’s Jack Smith.

In addition, the same ideological Lawfare elements will be targeting the threat represented by U.S. nationalist politician Donald J Trump.   It’s like The Great Reset crew inserting an operative inside a corrupt and friendly United States Dept of Justice, with the intent to remove the threat Donald J Trump represents to their interests.

On the multinational corporate side, while all this is special counsel stuff is taking place, the Wall Street billionaires and multinationals -those who control the two Big Clubs known as the DNC and RNC- will be providing the illusion of choice for the American electorate.

More on that aspect coming soon…..