Monday, October 17, 2022

The Establishment is Still Terrified of Donald Trump

Far from being a threat to democracy, Trump and his movement represent an unvanquished pocket of democratic resistance to the bureaucratic tyranny of globalism.


Barring intervention from the justice system, Donald Trump will be the Republican presidential nominee in 2024. His odds of defeating an abject, potato-brained failure like Joe Biden are looking better every day. Whether they admit it or not, the establishment is starting to dread the very real possibility of Trump returning to power through the normal operations of what we used to call democracy, or what’s left of it, anyway.

This is really all we need to know about the continued hysteria over January 6 and the government’s fishing expedition relating to some files Trump was keeping at Mar-a-Lago without permission from ideologically compromised librarians at the National Archives. The apparatchiks in the permanent administrative state see Trump not as a threat to democracy, as they claim, but as a threat to themselves and their power. While the bureaucrats have made significant inroads under the lawless Biden regime, they have not, at least not yet, been able to make Trump and the people he represents go away. This terrifies and angers them. As long as dissent is a possibility, they won’t be satisfied.

The regime mouthpiece, Washington Post, expressed the anxiety of the nomenklatura in a recent hand-wringing screed depicting the doomsday scenario of Trump’s restoration. What more could Trump possibly do, after winning an election he wasn’t supposed to win in 2016 and then almost stealing another with help from QAnon, to harm “Our Democracy™”? Well, he could install “loyalists” in the federal government (as opposed to the disloyal bureaucrats from his last administration who went on TV to testify against him in partisan show trials). He could “politicize the FBI” with “endless” investigations into his opponents. Just imagine! A president using the justice system as a political weapon? That would be shocking.

Trump might even use the military to maintain public order if “widespread street protests erupt against Trump and his policies, or if disputes over future elections turn violent,” [emphasis added]As the good democracy defenders at the Post see it, Trump would be obligated to just let this hypothetical anti-Trump insurrection happen. Of course, this scenario pretty much already took place in the summer of 2020, when insubordinate generals overruled his desire to quell the nationwide anarchy that forced Trump to take shelter, as the media simultaneously mocked him and portrayed him as a scary authoritarian. 

Let’s check in on how “democracy” is doing under Joe Biden. Let’s see: just a few weeks ago, Biden gave a nasty speech in which he declared that people who don’t vote for him are enemies of the state. The FBI is conducting SWAT raids against conservative protesters. Lest we forget, Biden came into power with the apparent aid of covert and overt suppression of true information about his family. Dare to acknowledge any of this, and you’ll be shouted down as an “election denier.” 

Speaking of election denial, has anyone been held accountable for the Russian collusion myth that kneecapped Trump’s presidency and sent millions into a tailspin of terminal partisan derangement?

If Trump wins in 2024, it will be despite years of relentless efforts by his enemies to undermine democracy. His presidential campaign was spied on. He was booted from social media while still a sitting president. Now, the attorney general of Trump’s dubiously elected rival and successor is under mounting pressure to put Trump in a cell. This is necessary to save “democracy,” which apparently no longer has anything to do with letting the people choose their own leaders. 

The growing clamor to charge Trump suggests the bureaucrats believe the struggle of the past six years is nearly decided, but they are right to fear if it is not. Trump has acquired the status of a heroic dissident to a large part of the country. Here is one advantage that Trump has over protégé Florida Governor Ron DeSantis: to quote a favorite song of his, Trump has taken the blows. He understands America is in a struggle for liberation against tyrants that goes beyond ordinary politics, a struggle which, for Trump, is personal.   

Feckless nobodies like former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) say Trump is “unelectable,” but this is not only incorrect, it shows a poverty of political vision. Far from being a threat to American democracy, Trump and his movement represent an unvanquished pocket of democratic resistance to the bureaucratic tyranny of globalism. If there is any hope for American democracy, it lies with Trump overcoming this administrative hydra and its chokehold on our constitutional government.



X22, Badlands Media, and more- Oct 17

 



4 days left until #GreatAmericanChristmas begins! Here's tonight's news:


The Tentacles of the Social Media Octopus ~ VDH

The wits of Silicon Valley know that if the public sees their products as toxic extensions of left-wing groupthink, the majority of Americans will shun them.


A shared theme in all dystopian explorations of future and current totalitarian regimes—whether China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, or Cuba—is government control of all media information, fueled by electronic surveillance. 

A skeptical public learns to say one thing publicly but quite another privately. It nervously nods yes at the news while at work, but at home cynically assumes the opposite of whatever is publicly said to be true.  

RIP, First Amendment

Such electronic propaganda has sadly become characteristic of the world’s oldest consensual government. 

In America we once believed our First Amendment prevented a government monopoly on information. But in the age of globalization, the Internet, and social media, the state has become the enemy—not the protector—of free speech. 

One obvious sign is that the Biden Administration keeps trying to create new sorts of ministries of truth or “Disinformation Governance Boards.” It alleges such Orwellian censors must combat “disinformation” and “misinformation.” In fact, these bureaucracies are designed to criminalize unwanted free expression while also advancing state propaganda. 

Among our Washington officials, the following myths were once declared the official version of the “truth”: 

  • Mounted border patrol agents “whipped” innocent illegal aliens.
  • Officer Brian Sicknick was violently “killed” by Trump protestors.
  • An “armed” insurrection sought to stage a pre-planned coup on January 6 designed to overthrow the government by violent means.
  • Christopher Steele’s dossier was a factual, well-researched compilation.
  • Justice Brett Kavanaugh was a serial sexual assaulter.
  • Jussie Smollett in Chicago’s wee hours valiantly fought off white, racist MAGA-hatted thugs.
  • Hunter Biden’s laptop was abject Russian disinformation.
  • And Joe Biden does not suffer from serious cognitive issues. 

What is unique about these lies is not that the government and its media partners advanced them, but that to this day, some continue to disseminate such untruths in spite of widespread and publicly available information discrediting them. 

California Governor Gavin Newsom just signed into law a bill criminalizing the work of doctors who express public doubts about medical orthodoxy. Specifically, the law warns that so-called dissident opinion is synonymous with “misinformation.” It is now a crime for doctors to spread “false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care.” 

If we were to criminalize all of history’s doctors who “contradicted scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care” then Hippocrates, Edward Jenner, Louis Pasteur, and Marie Curie would have been felons in their day. 

In America at one time “contemporary scientific consensus” assured us that cigarettes were not inherently carcinogenic, that H. pylori played no role in stomach ulcers, and that 120/80 is the perfect desired blood pressure. 

In contrast, if recent orthodoxy and “contemporary scientific consensus” is defined by the sayings of the now sainted Anthony Fauci, and if we canonized all his social media-spread misrepresentations, then today we would believe the following: 

  • The Wuhan lab had no role in the birth of the COVID epidemic;
  • The United States did not subsidize gain-of-function research in China;
  • No masks, one mask, and two masks are advisable;
  • Travel bans were unwise during a pandemic but cruises were acceptable;
  • Variously, two mRNA shots, three shots, four shots, and now five shots are needed for immunity from COVID;
  • and shutting down the entire economy and the schools was far less costly than keeping both open during the COVID epidemic. 

Big Tech and D.C. Fusion

The war on free expression is occurring not just because the government arbitrarily decided to brand some ideas criminal and others orthodox and then to mete out rewards and punishments accordingly.

It has also de facto fused with the multitrillion-dollar, left-wing media monopolies of Silicon Valley to help ensure that progressives benefit from such fusion misinformation while its opponents suffer. Cyberspace is a public domain. Those companies who use it to profit are public utilities. And yet California leftists who once regulated the power company Pacific Gas and Electric into insolvency mysteriously exempt tech utilities with far more life-and-death power over the public. 

Silicon Valley and both the Washington media and government assured us that the Russian collusion hoax was a slam-dunk conspiracy. Indeed, it would be quickly exposed by old Bob Mueller and his “dream team” run by zealot Andrew Weissmann. Twenty-two months and $40 million later it was exposed as a complete fraud. The fantasy ended with the bathos of a doddering Bob Mueller claiming he had no knowledge of Fusion GPS or the Steele dossier, the twin catalysts for his special counsel appointment. 

We soon learned that an FBI lawyer confessed to altering court documents to frame an innocent citizen. The bureau operatives also admitted to offering a $1 million payoff to Steele if he could just prove anything in his otherwise concocted dossier that the FBI nonetheless would knowingly continue to pass on as gospel to the FISA judges. 

Certain topics have become taboo on social media and government-sanctioned monopolies—most egregiously any discussion of alternative COVID-19 policies and treatments deemed antithetical to those advanced by Drs. Fauci or Deborah Birx. 

To suggest that January 6 was not an insurrection but a buffoonish riot of a few violent idiots who stormed the Capitol chambers (dwarfed in magnitude by 120 days of continuous looting, rioting, arson, and violence that killed 35-40, injured 1500 police officers, and accounted for $2 billion in damage) was punished by denial of the right of communication. To suggest that the 2020 election was essentially decided in Spring 2020 when left-wing fusion groups, against the laws of state legislatures, changed the voting laws in swing states under the pretense of the COVID pandemic, earned cancellation. 

More specifically, the twin monopolies of Twitter and Facebook both helped to suppress the truth and spread the lie about the provenance of the Hunter Biden laptop and thereby warped the 2020 election news coverage. 

Progressive Molly Ball’s infamous Time  braggadocious essay boasted of the fusion efforts to ensure a Biden victory in 2020 (e.g., “There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes”). Indeed, she gushed, the conspiracy “both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs.” And of that media-government-left-wing fusion, Ball further bragged, “That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.” (Emphasis added).

Mark Zuckerberg did not just use his companies to modulate and censor information for political purposes or collude with the FBI media teams. He also infused $419 (tax-deductible) million into supposedly nonpartisan, tax-exempt political groups that were created to absorb or fuse with the work of registrars in key left-wing precincts to warp and expand the Biden vote. 

Upstarts vs. Startups 

The California political clout and media monopolies of Apple, Facebook, Google, and Twitter are not that much different from the infamous “Big Four,” whose monopolies and capital ran the late 19th century Central Pacific Railroad—and with it, California. Like the old railroad, Silicon Valley usually insults the efforts of fledgling rivals and alternative social media as pathetic, insignificant, doomed to failure, amateurish, irrelevant, incompetent, and of no concern—all as the proper prelude to their paranoid efforts to abort them.

In the case of kindred left-wing “start-ups,” Big Tech buys them out and absorbs them. In contrast, they seek to destroy the tiny few “up-starts” on the Right by denying them platforms and application access or bleeding them out in court. Their modus operandi is similar to what Frank Norris once outlined in his 1901 novel The Octopus: A Story of California. 

The story of California’s demise is largely the use and abuse of Silicon Valley’s billions of dollars to pass crack-pot laws and regulations that exempt their elite creators at the expense of the middle class. Remember, cool left-wing hipsters with nose rings, T-shirts, tattoos, and flip-flops are the most ruthless monopolistic, crony capitalists in America’s history. They make a Jay Gould or William Randolph Hearst look like pikers in comparison. 

How does such an octopus continue to grow? 

First, there is the Big Tech two-step. When a Republican administration takes power, any effort to break apart the monopolies immediately is met with shrieks of “government attacks on the free-enterprise system!” Thus, to conservative administrations, CEOs of Silicon Valley pose as veritable Milton Friedmans, eager to claim ideological affinities with 19th century free-market, good ol’ American success stories. 

To left-wing administrations, they revert to form and assure that mega-profits will pour into the campaign coffers of hard-Left Democrats while six-figure jobs await revolving-door Washington left-wing apparatchiks. 

Second, true to its railroad octopus model, Silicon Valley is adept at suffocating any competitor that threatens its status-quo strangleholds over electronic communications or is deemed an ideological contrarian. And the powers of the corporate Valley are unlimited, enjoying the greatest concentration of wealth in the history of civilization, with some $11 trillion in market capitalization between San Francisco and San Jose alone. 

Google, Apple, and Facebook themselves are worth multi-trillions of dollars. Google controls 90 percent of all Internet searches. Over half the world’s smartphones are Apple branded. Facebook claims nearly 3 billion monthly users, almost half the world’s population. Along with Amazon and Twitter, these mega-corporations decide who can disseminate the news and how. 

After Trump was banned from social media, he and millions of his followers poured into the only existing alternative, the upstart rival to Twitter, Parler. That effort lasted just hours. Almost immediately, Apple, Amazon, and Google, on Washington’s prompt, suspended Parler’s social media platforms—claiming it was a conduit for January 6-like “insurrectionary” activity. 

None of them remembered that the 120 days of 2020 rioting, arson, looting and death were often carefully planned and coordinated by BLM and Antifa on left-wing social media platforms. We now know that Facebook, to take one example, censors content in a manner that the FBI or Pfizer—or other agencies and corporations—directs. 

Third, a revolving door ensures that those in left-wing administrations retire to and then reemerge from these media entities—earning fabulous salaries and stock options. The subtext is that their past federal service to the octopus should be rewarded, even as these political hires will at some time re-enter government and continue their left-wing Big Tech advocacy. 

Currently, 13 top White House aides to Joe Biden previously worked for Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Lyft, Microsoft, Twitter, or Uber. And 50 or more “senior officials” in the Biden Administration worked for Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, or Microsoft. It is now impossible for a Democratic administration to oversee Silicon Valley, when so many of its top-ranking appointees were enriched by Big Tech and likely will be again upon completion of their brief tenures. Currently, Biden grandees like Alejandro Mayorkas or Antony Blinken can claim prior dutiful legal service for Facebook, and likely will soon return to do work for their former paymasters.

Target Truth Social

We end with the latest example of Truth Social, the demonized Trump effort to provide a social media alternative to Twitter and other social media, currently run by the bête noir of America’s left wing, former California Republican Representative Devin Nunes.

Note that all media coverage of Truth Social is by definition negative. It is almost as if the new company had nefariously worked hand-in-glove with the FBI to censor opinion or had sent millions of dollars into election precincts to warp voting, or was removing participants for suggesting mRNA vaccines do not stop the spread of COVID. Oh, wait . . . 

Instead, in perfect fusion fashion—prompted especially by the New York Times and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—the SEC and apparently the Department of Justice are combining to “investigate” Digital World Acquisition Corp (DWAC). That investment company had been planning to merge with Trump Media and Technology Group, and then to take the new aggregate company public to obtain critical investment. 

Naturally, the Biden Administration is attempting to slow down or block the merger of Truth Social, and thereby starve the company of critical operating capital. After bitter complaints, and the bad publicity that followed the Parler strangulation, Apple and Google recently allowed Truth Social apps to be sold in their online application stores. And the result? Within hours of Google’s about-face, Truth Social became its number one app seller. 

Truth Social earns state and corporate hatred in a trifecta fashion: one, for allowing coverage of anti-woke subjects; two, for being run by CEO Devin Nunes who was despised by the Left for early on exposing the nature of the its Clinton-FBI-fed, Russian collusion hoax as a naked attempt to ruin the Trump presidency; and three, because Truth Social is now the social media home of Donald Trump himself—along with his reported 4 million followers. 

Even in their infancies and against daunting odds, companies like Truth Social offer alternative news. They can offer some reassurance that artistic or political expression in America can at least still reach the public. The frequently banned and ostracized “Libs of TikTok” or the journalists of Project Veritas found in Truth Social a temporary refuge in which to continue to communicate freely.  

Edgy entertainment expression—whether the hounded country-western star John Rich’s release of his patriotic, anti-woke song “Progress” (number one on the charts for two weeks) or Breitbart’s debut of “My Son Hunter”—have alike found sanctuary in Truth Social. 

As long as there are at least some alternatives to Twitter and Facebook, like a Truth Social or a Parler, that can escape the media-D.C. tentacles, these monopolies at least have to be cognizant that their own repressive and anti-constitutional practices have the potential to fuel the growth of dynamic competitors.

The sharper wits of Silicon Valley rightly assume that if their commercial products are finally imprinted in the public mind as toxic extensions of their left-wing groupthink, then the majority of Americans will shun them—and that is why they seek to ensure that the public has no such alternatives.



Empowering Mexican Cartels With Biden’s Open Border Is Even Worse Than You Think

Mexico’s paramilitary armies have an unprecedented amount of military-grade weaponry, paid for by millions of illegal border crossers.



Mexico is a war zone again. But anyone who believes that’s just Mexico’s problem, think again; American national interests are at unprecedented risk.

Cartels’ smuggling syndicates are at each other’s throats along Mexico’s northern border and in Pacific states known as the Tierra Caliente (Hot Zone) as Mexico sends in its military. The warfare has left hundreds dead and whole city blocks scorched, vehicles burning, and citizens taking shelter from hours-long gun-battles. Millions of Mexicans are readying for worse to come.

But so too should Americans. Because, unlike past drug war conflicts in Mexico, the paramilitary armies are swollen like never before with military-grade weaponry bought and paid for by millions of foreign nationals who answered the siren call of President Joe Biden’s open-doors border over the last 20 months, paying cartels huge amounts of money to cross into the United States. The cartels’ growing arsenals and Mount Everest-sized piles of new cash may inalterably compromise Mexico’s central and state governments like never before.

The very real prospect that America would lose even its current imperfect, wanting partnership with Mexico’s government portends serious security, public safety, and even wide-ranging economic impacts on the American people.

I’m not alone in my estimation that Biden’s cartel-enriching mass migration crisis poses serious threats to important U.S. national interests, including many that are rarely discussed out loud, such as Mexican oil and auto-parts exports.

“The criminal organizations in Mexico have made a lot of money off our lax border enforcement, and it stands to reason they’d invest a substantial percentage of that money into the thing that gives them their power,” Christopher Landau, ambassador to Mexico from 2019 to 2021, told me in a recent telephone interview. “Their power is measured in terms of money and weapons. The more money and weapons they have, the larger stick they’ll be carrying and the more influence they carry in Mexico.”

“It stands to reason that anything that increases the power of the cartels in Mexico is adverse to our interests,” he said.

The U.S. needs at least a minimally reliable Mexican government partner for matters of tracking fugitives, controlling illegal immigration when desired, interdicting drug trafficking, and intelligence-sharing for bi-national criminal investigations, and on a wide range of other national security matters.

Empowered Cartels Might Threaten Exports to US

In the past, the cartels avoided actions most likely to provoke U.S. demands that Mexico conduct military crackdowns, raids, arrests, and (worst of all) extraditions of cartel suspects to the United States for prosecution. All of that was bad for business.

But what happens when what is left of Mexican government autonomy is reduced any further, or entirely, too intimidated or bought off to retaliate on behalf of America?

The probability that Mexico’s newly muscular cartels become true puppet masters of Mexico’s central government stands at a high water mark, only rising the longer Biden allows his mass migration over the southern border to continue fabulously enriching them.

Dare anyone finally say this aloud, but: the more militarily powerful the cartels become compared to Mexico’s military, the more likely they will feel free to press a thumb down on the 212 million barrels of Mexican heavy crude oil the U.S. imported in 2021, and nearly a million barrels a day now. Perhaps, for any number of petty reasons of their own — say the U.S. incarcerates a beloved drug-trafficking relative — vengeful paramilitary overlords might want to meddle in Mexico’s huge auto part export business upon which American car makers heavily depend.

Cartel puppet masters less worried about American-ordered retaliations against them inside Mexico might feel emboldened to make thousands of American companies feel less secure operating in the country. Or they might do the same to the hundreds of thousands of American expatriates who make their homes and lives in Mexico. More Americans are concentrated in Mexico than anywhere else outside the U.S., an estimated 1.6 million.

When cartel power and whim to target American communities in Mexico overtakes the power and autonomy of Mexico’s central government to protect and deter on their behalf, what then?

“Your hypothesis does not seem far-fetched to me, in that the more power these groups have in Mexico, the less we can count on Mexico as a partner and the greater the challenge for us on everything dealing with Mexico,” Landeau said. “Even on energy … on auto component supply. It’s conceivable. Our economy is very bound up with Mexico.”

Cartels Own Enormous Amounts of Weaponry

It’s impossible to know how much military hardware the Biden border crisis bought and paid for, but the cartels are clearly reinvesting their massive profits into the sort recently uncovered in historic amounts from a northern State of Sonora raid. Inside four houses controlled by a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel, the Mexican army recovered 2.8 million rounds of ammunition, 89 hand grenades, 20 machine guns, six .50 caliber sniper rifles, more than 150 handguns and automatic rifles, and bulletproof vests.

The list of seizures involving high-grade military weapons is far too long to list here. The cartels have gone on an international shopping spree for weaponry that includes land mines, shoulder-fired rocket launchers, and belt-fed fully automatic machine guns. They make their own tanks and bomb-dropping drones. Their soldiers are as well-equipped and trained as any first-world nation’s, arguably better than those of the Mexican military.

In recent months, for instance, the Sinaloa Cartel has shifted major weapons acquisition activity southward into Central American black trade routes through which they are collecting the Israeli-made Galil ACE rifle made in Colombia, and automatic M16s and 5.56 mm rifles in El Salvador. But the weaponry is coming in from every direction, including from Mexico’s own military, its corrupted personnel selling advanced firepower to the cartels.

In May 2022, U.S. authorities broke up a Cartel del Noreste scheme to buy $500,000 worth of machine guns, grenades, and rocket-propelled launchers to be smuggled south from the U.S. into Mexico. An August 2022 report showed that the state of Tamaulipas seized 257 shop-built armored “narco-tanks” from the cartels in recent years, so-called “monsters” made of semis, SUVs, or pickup trucks encased in thick steel with machine-gun ports. Video shows well-kitted masked cartel soldiers filling them.

These are armies, with highly trained special forces units, supported by professional intelligence operations and run by warlords. They threaten one of the most important partners in the economic well-being of all Americans.

Debate has swirled for many years around the question of whether Mexico long ago fell into failed statehood. The reality is that the United States made do with a fairly compromised Mexico that was hanging in there. The sub-state paramilitary cartel armies reduced the Mexican government’s ability to act for America, but usually not enough to stop business continuity over the American border.

“In the past, when the criminal elements have gotten emboldened, the Mexican government has taken them on,” former Ambassador Landau told me. “But it’s not clear that’s in the cards right now. It’s far from clear, and I think the impacts will be massive.” 

Millions of Border Crossers Paying Fees to Cross

Biden’s election brought big change to cartel fortunes. Whereas before Biden, the cartels concentrated on smuggling drugs into America, they took a passive interest in the human smuggling business. They’d typically have third-party smugglers move migrants over the border areas they controlled and take a small cut for the crossing. But the gully washers of new human traffic that Biden spurred after his election — in their unprecedented millions — commanded their full attention. The potential earnings were far too great to be ignored, said retired Texas Department of Public Safety Capt. Jaeson Jones, probably one of the nation’s most knowledgeable cartel experts.

“People became the gift that just keeps giving,” he said. Like real estate yielding extremely high rent or toll roads, “They look at it as the best kind of commodity. It’s a commodity that can be told to move on its own and then it does, and at the same time, have to pay just for the crossing.”

Biden’s open-door border policies lured in more than 4 million foreign nationals since Inauguration Day 2021 to date apprehended by Border Patrol and another million who got through to become “got-aways.” Biden created a Frankenstein of a mass migration crisis, the largest in American history by every metric.

The majority of those 5 million would have had to pay. For the first time in memory, reporting indicates that human smuggling had become a multi-billion-dollar business in 2021 and may even have surpassed drug smuggling proceeds in 2022.

No one knows how much cartels really make, but Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) intelligence has taken stabs at it. ICE’s Acting Deputy Director Patrick Lechleitner told Congress the human smuggling industry was generating somewhere in the neighborhood of $500 million a year for the cartels prior to 2018. That revenue went as high as $13 billion through the end of 2021. A lower estimate came from John Condon, acting assistant director of international operations at ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations. He told a congressional committee the revenue ranged between $2 billion to $6 billion per year.

How much they earn is murky because smuggling fees can range widely, depending on how far an immigrant is traveling and nationality.

Immigrants have told me they’ve paid anywhere from a few hundred dollars just to swim the river to $12,000 per head to travel from Guatemala or Honduras. Cartels adapt prices and pricing strategy quickly to changes in American practice and policy.

Border Patrol agents tell me, for instance, that the Gulf Cartel came up with a pricing strategy to account for the pandemic-related rapid expulsion measure under Title 42. Illegal aliens returned multiple times could not be expected to pay $1,500-$2,500 each time. So the cartels offered Title 42 package deals, where a couple of thousand dollars buys a package of three guaranteed post-expulsion crossings.

In those areas, the migrants are all required to buy plastic bracelets proving payment, like at a water park. This innovation reflected a recognition that cartels can be overrun and that they simply created an inventory control system to capture the revenue.

That’s what legitimate business owners call a good problem to have.

Outgunning the Mexican Government?

As the next cartel war kicks into overdrive, the thing to watch is whether the cartels totally dominate Mexico’s central government with their new bribery cash and firepower.

Will the Mexican military, which is now deployed, be able or willing to bring the cartel warfare under control? Recent history shows that Mexico’s military, at least under President Andrés Manuel Lopez-Obrador, will accede to back-channel cartel demands at the point of their guns.

Consider an incident in 2019, when the Mexican army stormed a house in the Sinaloan city of Culiacan and arrested the 28-year-old son of convicted Sinaloa Cartel “Los Chapitos” faction boss Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman. The eldest son, Ivan Guzman, quickly mustered a very significant private army and retook the entire city with armored vehicles and .50 caliber sniper rifles. They outmaneuvered and outfought the Mexican forces during hours of gun battles and took families hostages. They threatened a bloodbath if Guzman’s son was not released.

The Mexican government capitulated and released Guzman’s son in what was widely regarded as a humiliating military defeat at the hands of a mere paramilitary group.

When we see more such defeats — or perhaps worse, no effort to even try — we’ll know to worry.




Rep. Adam Kinzinger Engages in Some Delusional, Wishful Thinking on Trump, Jan. 6 Committee


Jeff Charles reporting for RedState 

As you already know, Democrats and anti-Trump Republicans like Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) have been putting their hopes on the left’s House Select Jan. 6 Committee, which is ostensibly designed to get to the bottom of what led to the riot at the U.S. Capitol building on that day. It’s one of the few weapons Democrats have, since they have little to run on.

Rep. Kinzinger, who is on his way out of Congress, has been using the last days of his stint in the legislature to oppose the Orange Man What Is Bad™. His PAC has supported a number of Democrats running against Republicans who question the outcome of the 2020 presidential elections. But now, he appears to be under the flawed impression that the committee will squash all questions of what happened two years ago, when all is said and done.

During a Sunday appearance on ABC’s “This Week,” Kinzinger said:

Our mandate is to tell the American people the truth, come up with fixes. I know that my kid and I know that the craziest conspiracy theories kid in 10 years is going to believe that it was Donald Trump that started January 6. So all these conspiracies today will go away largely because of the work we’ve done.

When host George Stephanopoulos asked if the committee will make a criminal referral, Kinzinger hemmed and hawed a bit:

Look, again, I think the question of criminal referral really doesn’t have much of a point because DOJ is moving forward anyway. It’s not a mandate, but I think we’re certainly going to address that issue, and we’ll have more to come on that when we make that decision but regardless, it looks like DOJ has already begun this investigation.

I’ve got some bad news for Kinzinger – the Democrats’ House Select Committee will do nothing to erase questions about the result of the 2020 race. Very few Americans actually take these proceedings seriously. Indeed, most – including Democrats – believe it to be a politically-motivated circus designed to politically damage Trump, in a way that prevents him from running for president again in 2024.

The reason the committee is even in the news at this point is that everyone knows it is entering into its last days. If and when the GOP retakes the House, the committee will go the way of CNN Plus. This means House Democrats must make a last-ditch effort to use whatever means they have to smear the former president, which was the whole reason they started it in the first place. Unfortunately for them, Americans are far more focused on the price of gas and groceries than they are on what happened on Jan. 6, 2021.




The Triggering: Arizona Candidate Kari Lake -vs- CNN Dana Bash

John King’s ex wife on CNN, narrative engineer Dana Bash, was well prepared to target Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake on Sunday.  However, with a solid foundation grounded in pragmatic common sense, Mrs Lake eviscerated the effort of Ms. Bash.   Kari Lake continues to impress.

Dana Bash began the interview with a constructed strawman argument about how Kari Lake as governor would address the Joe Biden inflation crisis.  Kari Lake swatted the issue away with a strong policy position to eliminate state rental tax and taxes on groceries in Arizona.  Bash didn’t expect it, and never quite recoveredWATCH: 


⁙ ⁙ ⁙

Libs Freak After Kari Lake Runs Over Dana Bash on CNN


Kari Lake was at it again on Sunday, appearing with CNN’s Dana Bash. In an interview that provided multiple viral clips, the Arizona gubernatorial candidate demonstrated exactly how you handle a hostile press.

As expected, Bash channeled the greater media’s obsession with 2020, trying to spin an “election denier” narrative into her questions. Lake was prepared, though.

The way Bash tries to gloss over Democrat election denial, pointing out that Al Gore eventually conceded is par for the course. Of course, Gore only conceded after multiple attempts to overturn the election. Is that supposed to make him somehow superior? Never mind that Democrats then voted against certification after the 2004 and 2016 elections as well. Does Trump question elections in a more colorful, bombastic fashion? Sure, but you can’t say it’s fine for one side to question elections just because they do it more underhandedly.

Regardless, Bash tried again, this time asking Lake the most boring question imaginable: Will she accept the results of the coming election?

Lake demonstrated in that clip that sometimes, the best way to deal with the press is to simply get your message out there at all costs. Instead of letting Bash continue to push her narrative about “election denial,” Lake hits her with multiple examples of Democrat hypocrisy before dropping a burner of a line about accepting the election results.

Naturally, the libs freaked.

Again, these are the most boring people in the world. Inflation is through the roof, the border is in crisis, the stock market is crashing, and violent crime is up, among other things. Yet, the best these clowns can muster is trying to “translate” a political zinger delivered by Lake about accepting election results.

Absolutely no one outside of the beltway and Manhattan cares about this. They want answers on illegal immigration and the price of groceries. Anyone in Arizona basing their vote on supposed 2020 “election denial” was already going to vote Democrat. There was nothing new to be gleaned by Bash continuing to focus on that over far more pressing issues.

To be fair to Bash, she did ask about illegal immigration at one point, and in doing so, she desperately tried to push White House talking points.

It’s astonishing to me that any supposed journalist would go with that as a counter to a candidate pointing out that criminals abuse our open border. One, DHS is controlled by the Biden administration. That makes it not at all an unbiased source of information. Two, even if you take the stat at face value, it is impossible to actually vet most illegal immigrants because they are coming from uncooperative, third-world countries that don’t keep proper records.

To her credit, Lake handles the exchange fine, but it’s still frustrating. Real people are dying because of the border crisis. That includes both the illegal immigrants themselves and the Americans who will later be victimized. To continue to downplay that in an attempt to cover for Joe Biden is morally reprehensible. Bash and the rest of the mainstream media would do well to remember that.