Friday, August 19, 2022

The Woman Who Trounced Cheney is a Fighter

America needs more of Wyoming’s old-fashioned individualism 
and Harriet Hageman will bring that to Washington.


Wyoming didn’t just vote against Liz Cheney to express support for Donald Trump. Like President Trump, Harriet Hageman is not a politician. She is a fighter for the country. She ran because there is a big job to be done and she is a big enough person to step up and take it on. 

Hageman, the woman who on Tuesday trounced U.S. Representative Liz Cheney in the Wyoming Republican primary, is one of the nation’s top water and land rights lawyers, able to notch her belt with major wins against the EPA and radical environmental groups on behalf of ordinary people. She knows the administrative state for the monster that it is and has ideas about how to stop it from devouring our freedoms and our Constitution.

She was able to beat the powerful Cheney-Bush machine for the same reasons that Donald Trump won in 2016, 2020 and will win again in 2024. Hageman loves America. She is unafraid and incorruptible. She fights to win. She thinks out of the box and goes on offense. She had a positive and optimistic message based on America’s strengths. She is also a much harder worker than her opponent. And she is a smart person offering practical, common-sense policies that will return us to freedom and prosperity.

Sounds like Donald Trump himself, doesn’t she?

As a pampered child of the political elite, Cheney completely underestimated that a non-politician on a budget campaign would be a formidable—indeed unstoppable—opponent.  

Cheney offered nothing but NeverTrump hatred. Wyoming voters—and I am one—rightly turned on her for her delusional beliefs in a January 6 “insurrection.” We didn’t care for the stench of her self-righteous love of power. 

But we did more than that. We know we live in perilous times. This isn’t a horse race; it is a fight for America’s destiny. We are sending to Washington a top-flight representative to stand for our interests. She’s someone who can be a key helper to Trump when he cleans house of the deep state—the biggest challenge facing our nation. Hageman was not just fighting the Cheney-Bush cartel. She is fighting for America.

Think Wyoming is unimportant cowboy country? Think again. Wyoming is one of the top 10 states crucial for our national prosperity. It is the working heart of America, an America that elites ignore, but can’t survive without. Wyoming is our No. 2 energy powerhouse, right behind Texas. It produces more coal than the next six coal-mining states combined. Wyoming’s Powder River Basin is one of the greatest coal fields in the world, but Americans have never heard of it. 

If Wyoming stopped producing coal, natural gas, and uranium, 30 states would go dark.

It is one of the largest states in the nation, the emptiest and most wild—and most regulated. Half the state is owned by the federal government—U. S. Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and national parks. Mining and ranching, the mainstays of the state’s economy, require federal permission for much of what they do. Wyomingites understand Washington’s bureaucratic tyrants. And they understand the importance of fossil fuel to run the modern world.

As Hageman would say in her campaign speeches, she will not only represent Wyoming, she is Wyoming. 

What does this mean? 

It’s basic. Hageman grew up differently than most Americans, a childhood familiar to her voters. Harriet learned to drive when she was 4 years old. She would steer the family pickup across open ranchland, avoiding bumps and ditches, while her Dad stood in the back throwing out bales of hay for the cattle. Her childhood had more freedom, more responsibility, and more hard work than city and suburban families can imagine. It harks back to an earlier century. These are real Wyoming credentials. These are also values and the strengths the country needs, and needs badly.

To the self-annointed Uniparty, country people like Hageman are supposed to be dumb hicks. Ha! Harriet is smart—really smart, not ordinary smart. She is not self-conscious about being a powerful personality nor having a brilliant mind. She expects her audience to share this attitude of rolling up your sleeves to drill down into the problems to overcome, no matter how challenging. She can be surprisingly wonky on the campaign trail, educating her campaign audiences on what she calls “Regulation without Representation.”  It is a deep dive into the deep state, which she understands as well or better than most people in Washington.

This approach was lighting up the audience one evening when I heard her speak—the audience was nodding and at times groaning or laughing out loud. 

You wouldn’t guess Hageman grew up outside of a town of 350 people 100 miles north of Cheyenne. Her family met the normal challenges of ranch life—a mountain lion killing stock, her father bucked off his horse and breaking his back. In other ways, her family was exceptional. Hageman tells me:

[My parents] sent all six of their children to college, they adopted or took legal guardianship of three other children, and they took in over 40 foster children over a 25-year period. They believed in public service and instilled their beliefs in all of us. I’m eternally hopeful and optimistic. We can solve these problems if Wyoming can pull our constitutional rights back from the feds to control our own destiny. My message—why launder money through D.C. when we can improve things right here at home for our own citizens? Washington does not have Wyoming citizens’ interests in mind. If we could keep even 30 percent of the money Washington takes from our state in taxes and fees, we could do a better job than the feds. We have to get away from a central planning model.

With a Harriet Hageman victory, the GOP Congress would be getting another spine implant. 

America needs Wyoming’s voice. America needs Harriet Hageman’s voice. It needs to hear from Wyoming on energy, on how to win free from federal overregulation, on Wyoming’s lived principles of personal responsibility—helping neighbors and taking care of one’s own family. America needs more of Wyoming’s old-fashioned individualism. Hageman has the potential to be that voice on the national stage.




X22, On the Fringe, and more- August 19

 



ICYMI from last night: https://wwwp-lives.blogspot.com/2022/08/hetty-has-finally-been-mentioned-by.html

No, that's not really the article I really wanted to write. The 1 I've had pictured in my head all month involves me blowing up the new Hetty pics as big as I can get them, lots of caps locks and sirens, and basically a lot of joyful yelling like I just won the lottery. 😉 Maybe I'll get to write that kind of thing in the next 2 months. 🤞

Here's tonight's news:


Shame the FBI or Abuses Will Escalate

If the FBI can selectively leak portions of the affidavit agents used to justify the search of Mar-a-Lago, then why should it be allowed to conceal the rest of the affidavit?


I have been unable to locate any condemnation by the FBI of the leaks to the New York Times of the “highly sensitive information about witnesses, including witnesses interviewed by the government,” in connection with the Mar-a-Lago raid. That’s strange because only a day earlier the Justice Department told a federal judge that releasing the names of these witnesses would, “jeopardize the integrity of this national security investigation.” The silence is deafening. 

On Monday, the Department of Justice filed an opposition to the release of the affidavit the FBI used to justify its “panty raid” on Mar-a-Lago.“Disclosure at this juncture of the affidavit supporting probable cause would, by contrast, cause significant and irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation,”  the government argued. “As the Court is aware from its review of the affidavit, it contains, among other critically important and detailed investigative facts: highly sensitive information about witnesses, including witnesses interviewed by the government.”

The very next day, within 24 hours, the Times published an article exposing “Pat A. Cipollone and Patrick F. Philbin, the White House counsel and his deputy under President Donald J. Trump,” as the very witnesses whose identity the Department of Justice said it wanted to protect. If this were a real investigation, the target would now be warned to be careful talking to these two witnesses. 

The source for the Times article? “Three people familiar with the matter.” It’s conceivable that at the very moment a Justice Department lawyer wrote the warning to the court about revealing witness identities, three of the involved FBI agents were doing just that. 

Of course, there will be no condemnation of the leaks of the identity of these witnesses because it’s part of the FBI’s public relations campaign and election interference strategy. In spite of the FBI constantly seeking secrecy to protect its “sources and methods,” it’s more than happy to leak its sources as one of its very dirty methods. 

If all of this seems vaguely familiar, it’s probably because of the many developing parallels between the FBI’s Mar-a-Lago panty raid and its Russian collusion hoax perpetrated to obtain a FISA warrant. Then, as now, the FBI leaked supposedly secret details of its investigation to mount a politically inspired public relations campaign against Trump. The election-year leaks accusing Trump campaign figure Carter Page of being a Russian spy became so flagrant that Page wrote an open letter to the FBI demanding an opportunity to clear his name. He wrote

I am writing to request the FBI’s prompt end of the reported inquiry regarding my personal trip to Russia in July 2016—an investigation which has been widely mentioned in the media . . . Although I have not been contacted by any member of your team in recent months, I would eagerly await their call to discuss any final questions they might possibly have in the interest of helping them put these outrageous allegations to rest while allowing each of us to shift our attention to relevant matters.

In the case of the Carter Page FISA warrants, the FBI fought a vigorous battle to protect the supporting affidavits from public view. No wonder. While it claimed then that it was merely protecting “sources and methods,” it turned out that its sources included the debunked Steele dossier procured by Hillary Clinton and its “methods” included lying to the FISA court to get the warrant. 

The FBI’s most flagrant lie to the FISA court was its certification that intrusive electronic surveillance was the only way the FBI could gather information about Page’s Russia-related activities. Worse yet, when the Justice Department finally did cough up a sacrificial lamb, Kevin Clinesmith, he revealed during a court hearing that he had informed his unidentified and still uncharged superiors of the fabricated FISA court evidence and they chose to file it anyway. 

As  the New York Times reported, “Mr. Clinesmith’s lawyers also argued that their client did not try to hide the C.I.A. email from other law enforcement officials as they sought the final renewal of the Page wiretap. Mr. Clinesmith had provided the unchanged C.I.A. email to Crossfire Hurricane agents and the Justice Department lawyer drafting the original wiretap application.” 

That forged email helped conceal Page’s history of voluntarily giving the U.S. government accurate intelligence about his trips to Russia. The FBI could have asked Page anything without spying on him. That’s why the search was illegal and that’s why the FBI lied to the court.

Clinesmith, of course, never served a day in jail and has had his law license reinstated despite facilitating a fraudulent warrant application. So if the FBI has a proven history of lying in four FISA warrant applications to spy on Trump through Page and, further, does not punish the wrongdoers when they’re caught, we have ample reason not to take the FBI’s good intentions as a given in this case.

Since the FBI’s Mar-a-Lago panty raid, it has embarked on an orgy of leaking to shore up the public relations nightmare. It has argued, implausibly, that national security interests demanded the raid to retrieve sensitive nuclear secrets. Yet somehow the FBI vacuum cleaner scooped up Donald Trump’s passports, which clearly were not the property of the government nor “classified” in any way. 

Speaking of sources, the FBI appears to have activated its many allies, including some Republicans, to come to its defense. Former Vice President Mike Pence, according to the Times, “called on Republicans to stop attacking the nation’s top law enforcement agencies over the F.B.I.’s search of Mar-a-Lago.” Other “moderates,” says the Times, “chastised their colleagues for the broadsides against law enforcement.” That’s absurd. 

The FBI must feel the hot sting of public condemnation or the abuses will continue to escalate. There are many peaceful and legal avenues the public can and should take to push back against the FBI. Further, we should pay close attention to the names of Republicans who feel a mysterious compulsion to defend this clearly indefensible raid. It might be worth asking whether any FBI personnel contacted any public official to lobby for public relations support and whether anything was said to help motivate these public figures.

We now know the Justice Department likely has lost its bid to continue concealing the affidavit. As of Thursday, the same magistrate who signed the warrant has now ordered the Justice Department to make redactions to the affidavit in anticipation of a potential ruling releasing at least a partial copy of the warrant. It is unclear whether the magistrate considered the FBI’s strategic leaking as a sort of waiver of the government’s interest in secrecy. But the government has already signaled that it will redact aggressively. The magistrate promised to rule on those redactions next Thursday.

This isn’t 2016 anymore. The public is getting wise to the FBI’s dirty tricks. If the FBI can selectively leak portions of the affidavit used to justify the search of Mar-a-Lago, then why should it be allowed to conceal the rest of the affidavit? Let’s see what the FBI told the judge and fact check those claims. To paraphrase so many FBI agents, why not tell us if you have nothing to hide?



How Much Of The U.S. Has China Already Infiltrated Right Under Our Noses?

Through land grabs, media partners, and spies, the Chinese assault is less of a swift invasion and more of an endless infiltration.



Numerous pieces have been published discussing the inexorable rise of China, and the likelihood of the Chinese economy overtaking the United States’ economy. More concerning, though, is the fact that Chinese companies closely aligned with Beijing are directly influencing operations in the United States. They are buying up land, influencing news and media networks, and shaping the narratives on college campuses. The Chinese assault is less of a swift invasion and more of an endless infiltration.

Land Grabs

Fufeng Group, a company with close ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), recently acquired 300 acres of prime farmland in North Dakota for $2.6 million. China now owns well over 192,000 agricultural acres in the United States.

On July 25, obviously concerned by Fufeng’s purchase, Doug Burgum, the governor of North Dakota asked the U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin to “provide clarity on whether this land purchase has national security implications.”

Burgum’s fears are most definitely warranted. Over the last decade, Chinese ownership of farmland in the United States has increased dramatically. To compound matters, only a handful of states ban foreign ownership of farmland. Since 2016, a mysterious billionaire by the name of Sun Guangxinhas spent tens of millions of dollars buying land in Texas. Sun’s ties to the CCP are well known. 

In truth, Chinese ownership of American farmland is just one part of the disturbing equation. Residential real estate is the second part. China now accounts for roughly a quarter of total foreign investment, in U.S. residential real estate, according to Market Watch. The Chinese are now the largest foreign buyers of U.S. homes and this has been the case for close to a decade. 

Chinese Media Partners

The next step in Chinese infiltration involves corporate media. Take CNN, for example. It’s owned by CNN Global, which is part of Warner Bros. Discovery. This multinational mass media and entertainment conglomerate has close ties to China.

Three other highly influential networks, NBC News, CNBC, and MSNBC, are owned by Comcast. As Harold L. Vogel, a former professor of finance and economics at Columbia, wrote last year, Comcast’s reliance on the Chinese market cannot be emphasized enough. From “major feature film releases to a theme park, and to NBA basketball games,” Comcast is beholden to the CCP.

Furthermore, Comcast owns Universal Pictures. In 2016, Universal announced that it was partnering with Perfect World, a Chinese entertainment company. It has co-financed dozens of movies with Universal, including “Jason Bourne” and “The Northman“, one of the biggest movies of 2022. The Chinese connection runs even deeper. Last year, Universal Studios opened a theme park in China’s capital, Beijing.

Then, there’s ABC News, owned by The Walt Disney Company. The American multinational may very well be headquartered in Burbank, California, but it can currently be found residing in China’s pocket.

Spies on College Campuses

Ownership comes in many forms. It’s not just farmland, real estate, media empires, but also ownership of minds. This is where Confucius Institutes come into play. These public educational and cultural promotion programs are funded and arranged currently by the Chinese International Education Foundation, a shady organization affiliated with the CCP.

During his time in office, Donald Trump made a genuine effort to close as many of these institutes as possible. However, despite warnings from numerous Republican lawmakers, the Biden administration undid some of Trump’s work. According to a recent piece published by Voice of America (VOA), at least 28 institutes that were previously closed have recently reopened under new names.

As the VOA piece notes, On July 1 of last year, “one day after its Confucius Institute closed, the College of William and Mary established the W&M-BNU Collaborative Partnership with Beijing Normal University.” The Chinese university, we’re told, “was the American school’s former Confucius Institute partner.” Nothing, it seems, has changed but the name. New face, same dangerous ideas and philosophies. 

The Daily Signal recently reported the CCP-backed institutes have simply rebranded themselves. They have “retained their function of promoting the interests of the Chinese Communist Party in the United States.” These institutes are synonymous with espionage.  According to Christopher Wray, the 8th and current director of the FBI, Chinese spying in the U.S. has become so problematic that the FBI now launches at least two counterintelligence investigations every day in an effort to nullify the threat from Beijing.

How did we get here? How did we get to a place where a country that never tires of threatening the United States now molds the minds of students across the country, shapes the narratives dished out by major media outlets, and owns huge amounts of American farmland and real estate?

Would the CCP allow the United States to influence China in a similar manner? No, of course not. A lethal mixture of inattention, nonchalance, and poor policies has landed us in the hottest of waters. Cutting the Gordian knot won’t be easy. In fact, it might prove to be impossible.




Trump Derangement Syndrome Is Real and It Needs to be Studied


Brandon Morse reporting for RedState 

The concept of “Trump Derangement Syndrome” may have started as a joke to describe the over-reaction of hatred toward Trump, but after years of people upending good sense and their own principles in order to get at this man, I’m pretty convinced it’s real and that scientists need to study this in the future.

I see it every single day and as we drift closer and closer to the 2024 presidential election, I have a feeling we’re going to see it even more and in big ways.

Right now, the most popular example of it comes from Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, who just lost her reelection campaign by 37 points. The congresswoman had seemed to completely forget that she was there to represent the people of Wyoming and, instead, focused on taking down Trump through her January 6 committee. It probably didn’t help that Cheney’s husband’s law firm represents Hunter Biden in the grand jury probe and that Trump’s reelection may result in making her husband’s job all that much harder, but her hatred of Trump seemed even more personal that that.

Speaking of Hunter Biden, here’s a modern-day philosopher and podcast host Sam Harris saying that Biden literally could have had dead children in his basement and he’d dismiss it if it meant Trump would never be in office again. He also admitted fully that he’s completely fine with a conspiracy to stop Trump from being democratically elected.

I also see it on social media daily. Any disagreement with a leftist figure, no matter who, always results in the same replies about me being a Trump-obsessed drone, MAGA extremist, Trump-humper, etc., etc.

Trump seems to be all they can think about. It’s an obsession they can’t get past. He could literally rescue them, their children, and their pets from a burning building and they’d walk themselves and their family back into the fire to spite him. Like Harris, they would upend our Republic and embrace tyrannical corruption of government in order to stop him from ever getting back into office.

I’m not kidding when I say that if he does win in 2024, I would not at all be surprised to hear about a few suicides.

Does Trump have obsessed fans that believe he can do no wrong? Absolutely, and they’re just as annoying. Trump is not an infallible person and he should never be viewed as such. His faults are many, but he did a good job as President. When you compare his work to that of the current one, the differences in success are night and day. It’s not a question as to who was better.

Yet, there are some who will craft an entire fantasy world around them where Trump was a great evil who never did anything but great evil and will do nothing but great evil in the future. In their minds, he must be stopped at all costs, even if that cost means ditching firmly held principles. I’ve seen this kind of mentality before in personal situations, but never on a mass scale such as this.

Decades from now, when we’ve left this age behind, I truly hope scientists and clinical psychologists study this moment. I truly believe that this is something of a shared madness that has ruined the minds and relationships of many people. It’s caused them to debase themselves and become unreasonable. I hope future generations look back at this and learn from it because I fear if we don’t then this problem will just fester, and I’d hate to see how this could get any worse.




The Corrupt Media Can’t Wish A Successful Biden Into Existence



It’s as if everyone in the national media read the part in “Peter Pan” where he tells Wendy, “You just think lovely wonderful thoughts and they lift you up in the air!” and decided that’s their new strategy to aid Joe Biden’s awful presidency. 

New York Times fashion writer Vanessa Friedman on Tuesday heralded the return of “Aviator Joe,” who is — get this — wearing sunglasses again. She quoted Lis Smith, the woman most responsible for the harassment of America via the creation of “Pete 2020,” claiming Biden is “having a good month” because he’s “day after day wearing his aviators.”

In that same paper last week, columnist Charles Blow deemed the past month for Biden to have been “stellar.” (The accompanying photo was of Biden in aviator sunglasses.)

CNN’s Biden fangirl John Harwood also noted the newly ubiquitous sunglasses. “A winning streak does that for you,” he said. An article at Politico once again featured an image in the aviators and declared the president to be “piling up wins.”

It all might leave you with the impression that something has changed, but I assure you, everything still sucks. And the journalists who are trying to convince you otherwise didn’t read Peter Pan. They talked to the same White House official who phoned around Washington to get them all to say the same thing. 

Here is Biden’s “winning streak”: The national average price for a gallon of gas is down $.50 since last month (still nearly $1 higher than it was a year ago), and he signed into law legislation that pours billions into environmental (scam) projects and supersizes the IRS.

Don’t you feel those wins piling up?! What’s wrong with you?!

The bar is admittedly low for this president, but it can’t be that low. We’re still sending billions of dollars to Ukraine for a war Biden helped start. We’re still witnessing obscene numbers of Latin America’s destitute flood into the country through the southern border. We’re still dealing with record inflation, labor and supply shortages, and, yes, a recession. 

They can think happy thoughts all day. It’s not taking us anywhere. 




Oliver’s Twist, Policymakers Legislating Against the People – It’s Not About Going Green, It’s About Going Without


Last Saturday’s weekly monologue by Neil Oliver was a tremendous hit, helping to awaken millions of people from multiple nations about the true intent of this new governing system as promoted by policymakers on behalf of corporate interests [SEE HERE].

Earlier today (UK time) GBNews host Mark Steyn had Mr Oliver appear in studio to expand the conversation.  What results from Steyn and Oliver is a brilliant segment outlining the nature of this new governing system.  A system structured on the standard that disconnected policymakers are legislating to the needs of corporations.

When you remove the old “representative democracy” scales from your outlook and replace the lens with an understanding that representation now means representing the needs of multinational interests, almost all of the contradictions reconcile.

From that perspective, the Build Back Better or Green New Deal (climate change) agenda is not about replacing the system of energy production with a green system that duplicates the output. The intent of the new program is to produce less energy and then modify the uses of the now limited resource.  In one of the examples given, 30 million gasoline powered cars are not expected to be replaced by electric vehicles, a personal transportation system of far fewer vehicles is the goal.  WATCH (prompted):



 


Former CIA Director Says Republicans are More ‘Nihilistic’ and ‘Dangerous’ Than Terrorist Groups


Jeff Charles reporting for RedState 

Isn’t it funny how the folks telling us not to criticize the FBI because it will cause violence have no problem using the same type of heated rhetoric against conservatives? It might be a bit funny – but it is not surprising. This is politics, after all, and progressives are feeling particularly hypocritical at the moment.

Enter Edward Luce, associate editor at the Financial Times, who posted a rather braindead tweet about the GOP. He wrote:

I’ve covered extremism and violent ideologies around the world over my career. Have never come across a political force more nihilistic, dangerous & contemptible than today’s Republicans. Nothing close.

As if that wasn’t egregious enough, former CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden chimed in, expressing his agreement with Luce’s sentiment. “I agree.  And I was the CIA Director,” he tweeted.

In essence, Luce and Hayden contend that Republicans are worse than al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Rosie O’Donnell, who are among the detestable folks on Earth. The radical Islamic terrorist groups, in particular, have tortured and slaughtered innocent people all across the world. But the Republican Party is somehow worse in 2022.

Of course, neither of these people actually believe this. They are just saying this hoping their audience will be gullible enough to buy into it – and they might be right in many cases. But journalist Matt Taibbi pulled their tickets when he called them out for being disingenuous. He tweeted:

So “today’s Republicans” are more dangerous than ISIS, Al-Qaeda, etc? Given that you used drones to assassinate members of the latter groups, do you think that’s indicated here?

The bottom line is that the GOP is not an extremist group, nor do most of them hold extreme views. But Luce and Hayden still chose to engage in their clumsy attempt to demonize folks just for disagreeing with their politics.

But this isn’t the first time, right? It wasn’t that long ago when a major teachers union colluded with the Justice Department to label parents protesting critical race theory as “domestic terrorists,” right?

Even now, progressives are throwing out the term “stochastic terrorist” to describe those criticizing or questioning the FBI’s search of former President Donald Trump’s home. They are coming up with new and creative ways to stoke fear by villainizing those who don’t buy into their political beliefs. I suppose this means this is a day ending in the letter “y.”




James Carville Says You Are 'Stupid' and 'Evil' and the Media Is Too Nice to You


Joe Cunningham reporting for RedState 

Long-time Democratic strategist James Carville had strong words for Democrats and the far-left, but much stronger words for Republicans and their voters.

In an interview with The Hill, Carville lambasted members of his own party for their “ability to irritate” by espousing their desire to defund the police and other extreme ideas.

“These people have the ability to irritate,” he said in the interview. “They have the ability to come up with really stupid things, like ‘Defund the Police,’ the three worst words ever in the English language, maybe. And you know, ‘Let’s get rid of Abraham Lincoln.’ That takes a really smart person to come up with that.”

“So we pay while huge majorities of the Republican Party don’t believe in evolution,” he added. “Alright, huge majorities of the Republican Party followed Donald Trump. But somehow or another, we pay a greater price for 11% of our people than they do for 65% of their people.”

But, according to the Democratic strategist, “People that believe that the election was stolen and have a right to storm the Capitol, which is a substantial number of people in the Republican Party, are evil.” He continued, “Our people are kind of silly. Their people are actually evil. Racism is evil. Alright. Misogyny is evil. I’m sorry.”

James Carville
Photo by Colin Young-Wolff/Invision/AP

He even gave a nod to the woke progressive movement by adding “A pronoun is, to me is, ok, fine.”

“That’s not the same thing,” he concluded. “It is not, yet the media is addicted to both-sidesism.”

I’m… I’m sorry? The media is addicted to equally comparing both sides?

Some things are forever, I suppose, like the Clinton Era belief that the media is all-in on attacking Democrats. Never mind that the media has made it a point to actively attack giving any positive coverage to Republicans. I mean, as Fox News points out, Brian Stelter exists.

Various liberal journalists have called on the mainstream media to stop reporting on “both sides” of a political issue, suggesting that Republicans deserve harsher treatment. CNN’s Brian Stelter promoted a Los Angeles Times column that claimed journalists were failing the public because of “both-siderism.”

We have covered media bias extensively here at RedState. There isn’t a day that goes by where Republicans don’t get the brunt of negative coverage, and certainly more of it than Democrats. And that’s not me saying some Republicans don’t deserve it, but consider that, just yesterday, the media spent the entire day lamenting that their favorite Republican, Liz Cheney, was defeated and that the Republican Party had truly fallen into the hands of the extremists in the base. There is no similar lament when any centrist Democrats lose to far-left candidates, is there?

Carville doesn’t say anything publicly that isn’t to be interpreted as “You guys need to be saying this constantly.” It was Carville’s own advice to the Democrats over a year ago saying that they should make the midterms about January 6. He is also trying to get the party to accept that the far-left wokes are killing their election chances. He makes appearances solely to message to the rest of the party. This is another of those.

But in this message, it’s clear that this isn’t about politics or policy. It’s about straight-up division and demonization. This is the very rhetoric that leads to the political violence the left says it decries. Highly irresponsible.