Sunday, July 10, 2022

Our Young Guns

It is tough to find younger candidates who embody the right philosophy, who have the ability to win a hard campaign, and who will excel for their constituents and country when they reach office.


It is a maxim of business and sports that you are “only as good as your bench.”

That means you’d better have younger, talented people coming up the ranks who can jump in and take over when the time comes. Without them, you will lose or fail to perform. It is that simple. Many a team and company, in my experience, has put all their eggs in one basket, so to speak, only to find that they get injured, lose it, are traded away, or just don’t live up to high expectations. I could give you hundreds of examples. The landscape is littered with also-rans.

This is even more true in the hypercompetitive blood sport of politics.

The pipeline of young candidates coming up and through the ranks, at every level and for every office, determines the quality and quantity of seats a political party will hold—not just in the next election but far into the future.

Recall Edmund Burke, who championed what he called “a manly, moral, regulated liberty.” Liberty well understood, he argued, recognizes the power of self-interest but emphasizes self-restraint. I know “manly” is now considered sexist, but Burke lived in the 18th century of greater gentility. Just think of it as muscular.

Political liberty values calculation, planning, and ambitious state undertakings but attaches great significance to the steady development of sentiments, manners, and morals over centuries. Such liberty depends on a “science of government—of constructing, conserving, and reforming the state”—that according to Burke, involves “a deep knowledge of human nature and human necessities, and of the things which facilitate or obstruct the various ends which are to be pursued by the mechanism of civil institutions.” It recognizes that “the little platoons we belong to in society”—family, religious community, village, or town—are the original source of “public affections” and furnish the schools in which we develop “a love to our country and to mankind.” Today, we would sum this up as patriotism and, in Americans’ experience recently, Trumpism.

This kind of conservatism rejects theoreticians’ and intellectuals’ definitions of “the rights of men,” when they endorse license without limits. Instead, liberty well understood affirms “the real natural rights of men,” grounded in the advantages for which civil society was formed, including the right to live under the rule of law; to own and acquire property and to pass it on to one’s children; and generally, to live with one’s family as “one sees fit provided one does not trespass on the rights of others.”

Where are the young, patriotic candidates in 2022? The National Republican Congressional Committee announced that 32 candidates in 24 House districts have qualified for the first tier of its “Young Guns” recruitment and support program. The list includes more than a dozen candidates who ran and lost in 2020 and two former members, Maine’s Bruce Poliquin and Montana’s Ryan Zinke, who are attempting comebacks. 

“Recruitment is very strong across the board for Republicans, and this number of candidates this early, signals that,” NRCC spokesman Michael McAdams said. 

Republicans are largely on offense this election cycle as they attempt to capitalize on historical midterm trends and advantages in the redistricting process to win back the House of Representatives. They only need five seats to do that but with a Red Wave coming, they could take 50 to 75 seats in a midterm rout and realignment based on the failure of the Biden presidency and the out-of-touch leftward-bound Democratic Party on every policy front. We hear that a full 85 percent of all Americans think the country is headed in the wrong direction. Something has to change.  

As an illustration, let’s look at a handful of these races and candidates as possibilities for what is coming. 

Monica De La Cruz grew up in the Rio Grande Valley in the border town of Brownsville, Texas. She and her brother were raised by a single mom. She had a simple life that was built around faith, hard work, and family. Her mother raised her with a strong love of country as her grandfather served in the Navy in World War II and her brother served honorably 20 years in the Air Force. Monica and her husband own three successful small businesses and are examples of the American Dream. She believes in giving back to her community and has strong ties through her work with various community service organizations. Monica has three children and resides in Edinburg, Texas. She looks like just one of three Hispanic Republican women who will sweep into office this November. She is a real Top Gun.

Zach Nunn and his family have a track record of serving with action and delivering results for the country. Zach is a combat veteran who served three deployments to Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom, where he led forces in battle. He served as chief of operations for counterintelligence on Russia and China, helping to forge national security policy on the White House’s National Security Council. When government stopped caring about his community, Zach ran for office and won a seat in the state legislature, beating an entrenched Democratic incumbent by 12 points. Zach stuck to his principles: leading and passing Iowa’s largest tax cut for working families, protecting Second Amendment rights for Iowans, and delivering Iowa as the “#1 Best-Managed” state in the country, with a vibrant economic forecast and rainy-day surplus in the state’s budget. 

Zach is a grateful husband and devoted father. He and his wife, Kelly, have four kids, and when called upon, fostered two more. Together, Kelly and Zach own and operate a small business serving their hometown community. He understands and lives American Greatness.

John James, an African American, has lived his life placing service before self. As a teenager, John decided to serve his country in the U.S Army. He became a Ranger-qualified aviation officer after graduating from West Point. John served with distinction in Operation Iraqi Freedom where he logged more than 753 combat flight hours, leading two Apache helicopter platoons. He earned a Combat Action Badge (CAB) and two Air Medals during his service. During his time in Iraq, John began taking graduate courses, and later graduated with a master’s degree in supply chain management from Penn State University and an MBA from the University of Michigan. After eight years of service to the nation, James was honorably discharged and returned to Michigan to work in the family business, James Group International. James grew the company into a major logistics and supply chain partner with Michigan’s auto industry. John and his wife, Liz, love raising their three boys together. Throughout his life, John James found ways to serve his nation and his community, as a soldier, job creator, and Christian. Now, John looks forward to serving his community in Congress for Michigan’s new 10th Congressional District. He is the real thing.

Jen Kiggans is a state senator, geriatric nurse practitioner, U.S. Navy veteran, mother, Navy wife, and Republican candidate for Congress in Virginia’s 2nd District. In 2019, Jen was elected to the Virginia State Senate representing District 7, which includes parts of both Virginia Beach and Norfolk. In Richmond, Jen has stood up to the liberal one-party rule and has been a champion for veterans, active-duty military, the unborn, seniors, patients, and working families. She has fought for local job creation, lower healthcare costs, less wasteful spending, and more secure elections. Jen is a member of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, Virginia Geriatrics Society, American Nurses Association, and the American Legion Post 110. She is a recipient of the Boston University Scarlet Key Award for exceptional leadership and is a graduate of the University of Virginia’s Sorensen Institute for Political Leadership. She lives in Virginia Beach, Virginia with her four kids and husband, Steve, who is a retired U.S. Navy F-18 pilot.

My favorite addition to this list is Corey Gustafson, running in California’s reformatted 50th Congressional District, which is heavily Democrat. Since he was a former student of mine and a Claremont graduate under the great conservative, Charles Kesler, he is well qualified and very sure on his feet. He is a lifelong San Diegan who remembers when families could afford to live there, when they could count on the schools to provide quality education to their children, and when they could trust the local leaders to put San Diegans first. And in that process, they loved America and put it first, as well. San Diego has a rich Navy history and Corey honors it. 

Corey is running for Congress because he believes we need change. He has never run for office before. Instead of pursuing a career in politics, he co-founded a small business that provides good jobs for local workers. He has the kind of real-world experience needed in Congress. He can balance a profit-and-loss statement. He is also a university lecturer, teaching students the truth of the American Dream and the importance of American civics and history. His beliefs are grounded in individual liberty, opportunity, limited government, and American Exceptionalism. 

It is tough to find younger candidates who embody the right philosophy, who have the ability to win a hard campaign, and who will excel for their constituents and country when they reach office. Tough, but not impossible. As Lord Acton bemoaned, it is the rare politician, who doesn’t let power or privilege go to their head. Neither party in America has done a perfectly splendid job in this regard and incumbency and indeed, senility, seem to rule the day when it comes to elected officials from the president to the Congress. All the more critical to find and elect capable young blood.

And all the more important for the future of conservatism also that the party, the Republican National Committee, and all its local and state appendages, go out of their way to cultivate and nurture such future leaders. The “Young Guns” program is one way the party attempts to do precisely that.



X22, Christian Patriot News, and more- July 10

 



13 weeks until Hetty's team returns. (and I still need a real reason to get excited about it.). Here's tonight's news:


Trumped Up J6 Hearings Pump Trump Up

If Trump is the candidate, Americans will vote for him not in spite of January 6, but in part because of it—especially the deep-state response to it.


It’s been an eventful week. Boris Johnson, the prime minister of the United Kingdom, was forced to resign. Shinzo Abe, the former prime minister of Japan, was shot dead while delivering a campaign speech. And Ranil Wickremesinghe, the Sri Lankin prime minister, offered to resign after thousands of protestors stormed his residence and burned it to the ground. 

On the home front, various groups unhappy with some recent rulings by the Supreme Court have offered bounties for people who report on the whereabouts of the justices. A 73-year-old man in North Philadelphia was set upon and beaten to death by a pod of rampaging black teens. And it was widely reported that Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida, would be traveling to Utah to meet with conservative donors. 

It was that last item that really set the collective heart of the punditocracy all pit-a-pat. You could tell this by the number of reporters who breathlessly described the event as a meeting with “mega-donors,” “mega” being the favored intensifier du jour. It means, “This is serious. Pay attention.”

For those with an active imagination, what that event signaled was the prospect—glorious or terrifying, depending on the political coloration of the reporter—of a DeSantis candidacy for president in 2024. 

That would suit me just fine. I think DeSantis is one of the very best governors in the United States. He is also the one most often spoken of together with the word “president.” The prospect terrifies anyone on the Left who preserves even a slender tether to reality, for it is clear that set against a drooling, senile puppet such as Joe Biden or a clownish relative of Nancy Pelosi like Gavin Newsom, DeSantis would wipe the floor, dry the dishes, and tidy up the laundry with them. 

For many on the Right, DeSantis is the handkerchief with which they can mop their furrowed brow. For he is conservative. He is quick on his feet. And, above all, he is not Donald Trump. 

People often say that Trump lives “rent-free” in his opponents’ minds. This is true. But he has some impressive waterfront property in the minds of some of his supporters as well. They supported Trump in 2016. They say, many of them (most of them if truth be told), that they will support him again in 2024 if he is the candidate. But deep down they don’t want him to run. He is too “divisive,” you see. He doesn’t know how to govern. And—the coup de grace—January 6. 

Until a few weeks ago when Loopy Liz Cheney (R-RINO) really got going with her show trial entertainment, the word was that DeSantis would not run if Trump did. 

I say “the word was.” What I mean is that someone said that and many people repeated it. Who knows if it was true. It was part of The Narrative. But many of Trump’s fair-weather friends—Mick Mulvaney, for example—have stuck their fingers in the air and believe the breezes are blowing against Trump. Maybe they are. 

But the point is this: many of the people who Bill Kristol apostrophized with the phrase “decent and elevated conservative” don’t want Donald Trump to run. I understand their anxiety. For most of the 2016 campaign, I was anti-Trump. Ted Cruz was my guy. I wrote a dozen or more columns making fun of or warning about Donald Trump. 

Then Cruz dropped out. The contest then was between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. As I think I wrote then (if I didn’t, I should have), I would have voted for the terrier who lived across the street from me before I would vote for Hillary Clinton, at that time the most corrupt person ever to make a serious run for the presidency. (It’s possible that Joe Biden has her beat on that trophy: the jury is still out.) To me, it was no contest. One had to (well, I had to) support Trump

At first, I was pro-Trump faute de mieuxHe wasn’t Hillary. That was enough. But the more I paid attention to what he said, the more I liked what I heard. On judges. On energy policy. On immigration. On Democratic-run cities. On identity politics. On “the swamp.” And above all, on “Making America Great Again.” The more I saw of him, the more I liked him. I admired his energy. To me, the “mean tweets” were a feature, not a bug. I thought he gave some of the best presidential speeches, in form as well as substance, in modern history. And his tenure: as I said over and over again, I thought he had the most successful term of any president in recent memory, maybe ever. 

But what about now? Do we even know whether Trump will run? I always haul out Harold Wilson’s remark that “a week is a long time in politics” on such occasions. No, we do not know. Unexpected things happen. But if we are right in extrapolating from current trends; if the midterms go as expected; if Trump’s health remains strong: then, yes, I think he will run. Another indication, just in: he just repainted and renovated his Boeing 757, known the world over as “Trump Force One.” Why would he do that if he wasn’t planning to put it to work? 

But what about the protests at the Capitol on January 6, 2021? Were they not an inexpugnable blot upon Trump’s escutcheon? Should we not, as Loopy Liz Cheney wants us to do, recoil in horror? 

No, I don’t think so. And here’s where the great Stan Evans comes in. Evans was one of the most insightful, and certainly one of the funniest, political commentators of his generation. He specialized in saying outrageous things that at first seemed like comical exaggeration but, on reflection, appeared as sober reality. For example, Evans said he never really liked Richard Nixon until Watergate. Only then did he warm to him. 

I liked plenty of things—most things, actually—that Trump did as president. But it is really only in the aftermath of January 6, I see now, that his true greatness takes shape. 

The January 6 show trial is, as every honest person knows, simply an extension of the Mueller Russia-Collusion hoax. It is another effort by the Swamp to destroy not just Trump but the entire populist spirit that he gave voice to. 

That is why our Stasi—what used to be known as the FBI (secret police are always changing their name: what is now the FSB in Russia was the KGB and before that the NKVD in the Soviet Union)—has been so assiduous in rounding up and jailing people who were in or around the Capitol that day. (See Julie Kelly’s superb reporting on this outrageous violation of constitutional rights.)

Drunk with power, Cheney arranges for dawn raids and sudden arrests of people associated with Trump. It is disgusting. It is evidence of the extent to which America has slid into the fetid precincts of the police state. The Star Chamber over which she presides is not a “hearing.” It is a show trial with one multifaceted goal: to destroy Trump and the populist revolt he instantiated. It is a malodorous, deep-state initiative that has nothing to do with “finding the truth” and everything to do with pursuing a partisan vendetta. 

Everything associated with it should be vomited out of the mouths of the body politic. Only thus will the poison of the anti-Trump, which means the anti-American, pathology be purged. Cheney’s aim is to forge a tablet of shame to hang around Trump’s neck. I say, celebrate it. Trump had nothing to do with his (unarmed) supporters traipsing through the Capitol. But the more we see of Cheney and her unhinged lieutenants, the better those protestors look. If Trump is the candidate, I’ll vote for him not in spite of January 6, but in part because of it, especially the deep-state response to it. I know Stan Evans would have wanted me to.



Rep. Victoria Spartz, Who Emigrated From Ukraine, Tells Biden, Zelenskyy to 'Stop Playing Politics' Over War Aid


Levon Satamian reporting for RedState 

Congresswoman Victoria Spartz (R-IN) emigrated from Ukraine, and she is sending a somber message to Presidents Biden and Volodymyr Zelenskyy about the billions of dollars being shipped to Ukraine amid the ongoing war with Russia.

Spartz, in a new, exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, warns that Russia has a “strategic interest” in taking over Ukraine’s intellectual property and raw materials. She also speaks about the “reluctant and slow” reaction by Biden and Zelenskyy to take action to reduce Russia’s military, propaganda, and intelligence successes in Ukraine.

One solution, she argues, is for Congress and Biden to adopt “urgent action items” for the aid we’re giving Ukraine, adding that Biden must “have a clear strategy” — and he and Zelenskyy need to “stop playing politics with people’s lives.”

So far, the U.S. has sent about $7.3 billion of aid to Ukraine since February. Spartz says that Congress has a duty and responsibility to make sure there is “transparency and oversight” of taxpayer money.

“We need to be able to make sure that this money is spent efficiently and also that we have ability to be accountable to our taxpayers. And I think that is a must that Congress has to establish … It’s very unusual situation since we really don’t have our people on the ground. So we have to be creative. But I’m sure, as a former auditor, I can give a few suggestions and get it done very easy. So it’s not that hard to do. We can get it done, and I think we must have it done.”

She admits that how the situation has been handled so far leaves her “kind of embarrassed”:

“As a proud American, first and foremost, I’m kind of embarrassed that we let [Russia] get away with so much. But I think there is no time for games and politics right now. And our leaders and President Zelenskyy need to learn.”

She calls on Zelenskyy to transition Ukraine entirely into “war mode,” instead of acting as if life was normal at a time of war.

“It’s not a rebuilding mode right now. [The] country [is] in the middle of a major war. And you have to treat it as the war. You cannot have life as usual, unfortunately, or you have it a very long time, and it’s going to be very bad.”

Spartz concludes by urging Biden to “work with Republicans” on an issue like national security, “where Congress can come together if the president wants to lead”:

“So he needs to start governing and work with Republicans if he wants to work, because there are a lot of divisive issues. There are a lot of issues we’re going to be in the trenches fighting. But I think national security, this is an issue where Congress can come together if the president wants to lead, and he needs to stop being afraid to lead.”

It is clear that the United States will continue to support Ukraine in its war with Russia, but as Spartz noted, the Oversight Committee needs to make sure the money is spent efficiently. That will ensure Ukraine has strong standing, and taxpayer money is being used effectively.




The Decline Of The American Work Ethic Will Exacerbate The Oncoming Recession

Americans have clearly gotten used to not working and have chosen to live off the pandemic welfare that remains rather than return to the workforce.



The Atlanta Federal Reserve recently projected that second-quarter GDP fell by 1.9 percent. If its model proves correct, the U.S. economy has fallen into a recession with GDP shrinking for two consecutive quarters. Whether we are technically in a recession is far less important than the reality of the recession Americans have been experiencing for months. At this point, with ongoing historic inflation, Americans are also likely enduring stagflation.

The Biden administration’s bad economic policies bear much of the responsibility. So, the administration and congressional Democrats are trying to distract from the contracting economy and runaway prices by pointing to the supposedly strong labor market. They argue that the country is not in a recession as long as the unemployment rate stays low. As with so much, we’ve heard from this administration, it’s just not true.

On Friday, the Labor Department announced that the economy created 372,000 jobs in June and the unemployment rate held at 3.6 percent. President Biden has continually bragged about the supposed historic job creation under his watch taking credit for people returning to work following the pandemic.

Yet the labor market isn’t as rosy as the topline unemployment rate suggests. There are still over 500,000 fewer people working today than before the pandemic despite the V-shaped recovery Biden inherited from President Trump. 

Yet, employers are desperate to hire. There are 11.3 million unfilled jobs nationwide. That’s nearly 2 jobs for every unemployed person. This obviously raises the question: why are fewer people working than was the case pre-pandemic?

Well, the answer is equally obvious. Not enough Americans are willing to work. The labor force participation rate remains well below its pre-pandemic standard. In fact, were labor participation today the same as when the pandemic began, the unemployment rate would be 5.5 percent. It’s only 3.6 percent because fewer people are working or actively looking for work.

Generous social welfare programs, expanded during the Covid-19 pandemic, help explain this labor market paradox.

During most of 2021, supplemental federal unemployment benefits and boosted child tax credits, distributed monthly, paid most entry-level workers more to stay home than return to work. A June 2021 study by economists at the Committee to Unleash prosperity found that a family of four with two parents out of work earned around $72,000 in unemployment benefits, more than the national median household income. 

These programs have ended thanks to brave, primarily Republican, policymakers who recognized their unintended economic consequences. While these programs were necessary during the pandemic when state governments told people they could not work, their corrosive impact on the American work ethic remains. It’s hard to deny the reality that some Americans have clearly gotten used to not working and have chosen to live off the welfare that remains rather than return to the workforce.

This is not a criticism of people genuinely in need of government assistance. We are a rich nation. We should, and we do, help those in need. But the able-bodied should work both for society’s benefit and for their personal benefit, their dignity, and sense of self-worth. President Clinton and Newt Gingrich affirmed this notion when they imposed work requirements for welfare recipients to great effect in the late 1990s. It’s a simple notion – those who can work should.  

Pandemic-era welfare enhancements still in place have aided the current disinclination to work ethic. For instance, Congress expanded food stamps and removed work requirements to receive them. The United States Department of Agriculture gave states “emergency allotments” of food stamps that have continued long after the pandemic emergency ended.

In October, the Biden administration implemented the largest permanent increase in food stamps in the program’s history. The average food stamp benefit is now nearly double what it was in 2019. Unsurprisingly, the number of households on food stamps has not meaningfully declined since the pandemic ended. 

The public health emergency also allowed states to increase Medicaid enrollment by 20 percent and forbade them from removing residents from the program even though many likely no longer qualify. They cannot do so until the Biden administration declares an end to the public health emergency.

These welfare expansions are in addition to the smorgasbord of public benefits out-of-work Americans already receive, including unemployment insurance, housing vouchers, energy subsidies, childcare subsidies, and direct cash assistance. In addition, states offer their own social programs. Together, they amount to a government-dependency trap, disincentivizing work.

Employers across the country tell me that their employees routinely make the rational decision to drop out of the workforce entirely – or at least take a break from it – cushioned by this generous aid.

Again, we should help people who cannot help themselves as these programs do when properly distributed. But incentives matter and those who can work should. 

Congress must immediately roll back this expanded welfare, reinstate associated work requirements, and reform longstanding programs to help the labor market reach and exceed its pre-pandemic peak – which would help reduce inflation as employers staff their businesses and replenish the supply chain allowing the economy to recover to everyone’s benefit.

However, public policy solutions may be insufficient if we delay taking action. Employers also tell me of a degraded work ethic among a large group of younger Americans today that transcends financial considerations. These workers are quick to quit at the first challenge they encounter. They are unwilling to put in the effort to learn and improve. And they regularly turn down shifts and even opportunities for overtime pay. If you think I’m being unnecessarily critical, go talk to a local employer.

Fully reestablishing the American work ethic is a long-term project. Unfortunately, the economic problems the country is facing are here and now. If our elected leaders are unwilling to acknowledge the problem, let alone address it, expect the recession to be deeper and longer as a result. If we do not restore the American work ethic, expect much worse.



Retired Army General Gets in Trouble for Tweet to Jill Biden


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

Jill Biden was trending on Twitter on Saturday, and not just because of what her stepson Hunter called her in his texts.

It’s because once again, we seem to have one of those situations where there are two sets of rules — in this case, if you come up on the wrong side of the Bidens, it’s not going to end well for you.

The Army has suspended a retired three-star general, Gary Volesky — a man who earned the silver star for valor while serving in Iraq–while it conducts an investigation. He was still working for the Army in a contract capacity, advising active-duty officers as a mentor for $92 an hour.

What did he do that earned him a suspension and an investigation? He responded to a tweet from Jill Biden.

“For nearly 50 years, women have had the right to make our own decisions about our bodies,” Jill said. “Today, that right was stolen from us.”

That, of course, was a lie. The Supreme Court decision found there was no constitutional right and sent the question back to the states, so Americans could vote on it. But talking about norms–this was Jill Biden, whose husband was supposed to be upholding the constitutional order, attacking the Supreme Court.

Volesky responded to the tweet, “Glad to see you finally know what a woman is.” Hardly the most scandalous thing in the world and certainly funny, as well as on target.

But they suspended him over that, and are now investigating if it “violated decorum rules for retired officers.”

So, I have a few questions.

If this is somehow offensive for wading into politics, I’d like to know how they characterize this attack from the Department of Defense under Joe Biden against Tucker Carlson?

They also had people in uniform from official accounts going after Tucker Carlson because he raised a question about Joe Biden’s focus being “maternity flight suits and updating requirements for hairstyles.” That was seemingly no problem of decorum.

So, it’s proper to talk about smiting a Fox host and all the remarks on diversity are just fine, but a light remark about Joe Biden’s wife isn’t?

Please don’t pretend that you’re not being involved in politics–when you’re hip-deep in it and spreading it thick.

We know the problem here is because it was directed at Jill Biden and because Volesky showed that he might have the wrong politics. If Volesky’s comment had been suitably leftist and directed at Tucker Carlson or a Republican politician, we know it would have been no problem. That’s an issue with our military now, which isn’t supposed to be politicized. But we can see it in real-time as it’s happening.




The Governing Class Discovers that People Owning Nothing Does Not Make Them Happy


In his weekly monologue Neil Oliver gives his perspective on the changing of the guard at #10 Downing Street.  Meet the potential new boss, same as the old boss etc.   While drawing attention to the detached and aloof viewpoints of the self-installed ‘ruling class’, Oliver riffs one of the best lines from this week:

“Two years ago, I gave scant thought to acronyms like WHO, UN, WEF.  Now I watch them with the same attention I give to dogs that look like they might bite.”

Damned if that isn’t the truth.  WATCH:


[Transcript] – The running of this country has precious little to do with we, the people – that much becomes more obvious every day. Ever more blatantly the powers that be are treating us like the sitting tenants in a property they want to knock down so they can sell the plot for profit to their pals and assorted foreign carpet baggers.

We the people, with our individual opinions and ambitions and dreams are just in the way of their anti-human fantasy of a so-called progressive future. They got fed up waiting for us to die of old age in our armchairs, in front of three bar electric fires we can’t afford to switch on, and have set about demolishing the old place while we’re still living in it.

Love him or loathe him – and I’ve been no fan of him or of any of the leaders we find ourselves saddled with in the West – PM Boris Johnson was brought down last week not by the millions who had voted for him, as might have been appropriate given any meaningful understanding of the concept of democracy – but by a hellish coupling of media and the self-worshipping political class that appointed themselves judge, jury and executioner. Together they wanted Johnson gone, and so he was gone.

The party atmosphere after his resignation – the glee and the gloating by those journalists that had conspired and shared in the taking of his scalp was plain to see. I really don’t think it’s supposed to be that way.

In the aftermath of Johnson’s defenestration there was a suggestion from former Tory PM John Major that the process of anointing the next leader of the Conservatives should bypass party members altogether – presumably in case troublesome proles with their taste for Brexit and borders, even for Britain itself, picked the wrong person again. Far better, thought the likes of Major, if Tory MPs just exercised their superior intellects and morals and did the choosing for them.

Hoary old Tory and arch-remainer Michael Heseltine’s cage was evidently rattled by all the noise and in predictable style he was instantly crowing that the passing of Johnson should mean the end of Brexit.

Once more the proof that those regarding themselves as our intellectual superiors still regard a decision made by an undeniable majority of British people only as evidence of the stupidity of the great unwashed.

In displays of audacity and temerity that are beyond the reach of adjectives, those that plotted Johnson’s demise are falling over one another to take his place. It’s like looking through a microscope at something revolting happening in a petri dish. Former chancellor Rishi Sunak had his slick and glossy show reel ready for broadcast before his former boss had delivered his resignation speech. I wonder when he performed for that instead of doing more damage to the economy. I don’t feel like having any of their names in my mouth, I really don’t.

So I will just say that for me the thought of any that stood for lockdowns, for damaging children’s physical and mental wellbeing, that oversaw the crashing of the economy, watched uncounted lives physically and mentally destroyed, advocated mask wearing on the street and cheer led the unholy pressure to take experimental injections or lose jobs and or reputations as a consequence … that called for digital vaccine passports or anything like them … that won’t shout from the highest hill that the green agenda and Net Zero are a disaster and must be scrapped immediately … the thought of any that demanded it all, or stayed silent while it all played out, should now occupy No. 10 and contemplate more of the same in the months ahead makes me sick to my stomach.

For me the change of PM is nothing more than a change of drivers on a train. The train we’re on is going where it’s scheduled and timetabled to go, on rails already laid, and in the face of its forward momentum we the people, it would seem, count for nothing.

From behind one podium after another, western leaders and their lackeys talk more and more openly about a liberal world order – even a rules-based liberal world order. The more I hear and see about a world ordered by self-described liberals and their rules, the less I like it. I certainly don’t recall ever being invited to vote for it. Two years ago I gave scant thought to acronyms like WHO, UN, WEF. Now I watch them with the same attention I give to dogs that look like they might bite.

At some point in the past – and I missed that point too, whenever it was, I will freely admit – the governing class decided they were done with serving us and that they own us and rule us instead. That cancerous thought has metastasized in recent years, so that it’s not just governments and their bureaucrats and preferred scientists who presume to lord it over us, to tell us what to do, what to think.

That same deranged thought is there throughout the greediest capitalist corporations now as well. The technocrats took free speech by the throat long ago, so as to preserve and push their own self-described progressive ideologies. Now that same superiority complex is everywhere else as well.

Halifax bank got on their high horse about pronouns and loftily declared that customers who didn’t like seeing staff wearing such on their badges should take their business elsewhere. And so, customers duly did, right enough, taking their hard-earned cash with them.

Since when did money-grubbing corporations decide it was appropriate to start telling customers what to think about sex and gender?

Ice Cream vendors Ben and Jerrys got on their soap box to criticize the British government’s plan to offshore asylum seekers to Rwanda – when surely their time would be better spent learning more about obesity and diabetes and their likeliest causes.

So here we are – we the British people are held in low regard not just by politicians and their ilk, not just by the awkward savants of the search engines and social media platforms, but even by High Street banks and ice cream vendors.

It feels like there is a club somewhere, or a positive feedback loop, in which everyone involved, and it’s definitely not us – politicians of all stripes, faceless bureaucrats, journalists, bankers and corporations – feels entitled to make all the decisions about every aspect of our lives and then to tell us how it’s going to be. We the people are to be downtrodden, demoralized and deceived.

In the wider world, it is farmers who are the latest citizens pushed beyond breaking point. In a replay of the Truckers’ protest in Canada that so captivated many of us, gave us hope however brief that an end to the deliberately destructive madness might be in sight, there are tractor protests in the Netherlands, in Germany, in Italy, in Poland.

When those who grow and raise the food we eat are angry and scared enough to down tools and take to the streets to fight for their very existence, when those who drive the trucks that bring us everything we depend upon for our daily lives have done likewise … perhaps it’s finally time to pay attention to the unfolding catastrophe.

Among the Dutch farmers the anger was pushed above boiling point by government diktats regarding emissions of nitrogen and ammonia into the environment. Plans to reduce those emissions by as much as 70 percent will, farmers say, put many of them out of business altogether. They say it’s not about saving nature, but about leftist government plans to change land use in the Netherlands, forcing farmers to sell their land and to cut the national cattle herd by as much as 50 per cent.

Dutch farmers are among the most productive in the world – exporting 100 billion dollars worth of dairy and crops every year. Their banners say No farmers, no food.

The world is in a time of food insecurity and still governments would apparently prefer to contemplate a future in which people will suffer in every conceivable way. And in the future presently shaping up, people will most definitely suffer. Those governments are plainly not in the business of fixing anything, rather making matters worse.

Canadian PM Justin Trudeau – he that forcibly shut down the truckers’ protest in his own county and seized their bank accounts – has his country on a similar path to that of the Dutch. In a time of global food insecurity – blamed in part on war in Ukraine – ideologically driven administrations are stamping their metaphorical boots down upon their farmers’ backs.

In Holland, shots have been fired – allegedly by police, at one tractor. This is how basic things are becoming, how near the bone. Here in the west, in the 21st century, we are being prepared not just for a future without cars, but a future of less energy… less warmth… and even less food.

I knew there was something badly wrong with all that’s going on when I realized my response to what was happening, to all that we were being told, was physical. All of this actually makes me feel ill, to my bones.

I have never in my life before listened to government policy – and to the policies of governments all around the world – and felt endangered. But I do now. If you feel that too – a deep physiological response to the last two years, and a growing sense of something malevolent – then you are not alone. Sometimes it feels like society itself has been poisoned – and that all that society is being offered is yet more poisonous nonsense.

We should notice that it is from among us, the ordinary people, that the farmers and the truckers come – so that it is we who really have the power that matters in the end.

In Sri Lanka, they’re quite a bit further down the line than us – although hardly out of sight. Thousands of people, driven beyond endurance by economic collapse and the worst food and fuel shortages in living memory, found they had nothing left to lose. I read this morning about protestors there storming and occupying their president’s official residence in the city of Colombo.

Desperate people and desperate measures. It’s interesting to note that, contrary to what Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum might think … it turns out that when some people find they actually do own nothing anymore – they’re really not very happy at all. (LINK)