Friday, June 3, 2022

Yes, They’re Coming for Your Guns

What the un-American Left really wants is to destroy the American people’s right to self-defense.


Perhaps, like me, you’ve always had a sneaking suspicion that the un-American Left is ignorant of many things. But then they open their mouths and remove all doubt. 

The most recent example comes from the gaping maw of Elie Mystal on MSNBC, where he claimed that, like everything else in this country apparently, the Second Amendment is the creation of long-dead, racist white supremacists who supported it for the sole purpose of putting down slave revolts keeping the enslaved populations in bondage. Of course, there is as much “truth” to that as there is in the 1619 Project. Progressives use such revisionist history to discredit the founders so that they can dismantle the founders’ republic.

The basic history lesson the Left seems to have missed while being indoctrinated in our schools is this: the founders believed in natural inherent rights—ones that were given to human beings by their Creator. As these were rights given by a transcendent source. They understood that no earthly power—say, a despotic British empire—could legitimately take them away. Among those rights were life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and property, but that was just a start to their list. In fact, Alexander Hamilton didn’t think a Constitution could ever be written that could fully enumerate all human rights. 

In this discussion of rights, understand that the founders also viewed as inherent the right to property. As Madison wrote, “There is a right to property and a property in rights.” These beliefs informed the founders’ construction of the machinery of government in our Constitution and Bill of Rights, which are really nothing more than an attempt to spell out and codify higher, transcendent law so it can be formed into a workable form of earthly government. Because of that, the founders also believed that a free populace had the right, if not the responsibility, to protect their God-given rights with anything and everything at their disposal; to not defend their natural rights was to shame their Maker.

It was to that end the Second Amendment was written. When all arguments and words failed in the defense of natural rights, the last defense is an armed one. The Second Amendment is for when the talking is done and the shooting begins. A “well-regulated militia” did not mean, as Progressives insist it does, some formal government entity, the membership of which is determined by the government. The founders simply meant that citizens needed to have the right to possess weapons sufficient to organize themselves into militias. In no way did they imagine government regulation of who gets a gun or who doesn’t. 

The founders defined a well-regulated militia as one well armed with the best muskets, supplied with copious amounts of ammunition, and regularly drilled to maintain proficiency with those weapons. Again, revisionists want to define words in terms suited to their altered telling of history, but that’s antithetical to the historical method, real history, and the founders’ use of the terms.

All of which is to say that I am pretty sure the founders would have advocated Stingers, Javelins, and machine guns (and, yes, even tanks) for private citizens to use in defense of their rights today. They were all for the people being as well-armed as any government in order that they would serve as a bulwark against the government becoming despotic and attempting to take away their rights. 

Case in point: When the founders were confronting an increasingly draconian British government, and all attempts at dialogue with the Empire failed, they were simultaneously and actively smuggling and stealing cannons and gunpowder; dare I say, actively smuggling and arming with “weapons of war.”

So all this talk from Progressives about why the Second Amendment is really just a well-regulated, government-sponsored militia can be summed up in one word: gibberish.

What the un-American Left really wants is to destroy the American people’s right to self-defense. Why? Because it’s much, much harder to send people to reeducation camps where “conscience reformation” can happen when those people are shooting back at you. 

In watching recent events unfold, I’ve concluded the irreligious, un-American Left simply hates you and your rights. Don’t fall into the trap of thinking they don’t, that somehow they’re rational human beings who can be reasoned with, or that ultimately they want what’s best for the American people. If they did, then Joe Biden would never have just admitted that his administration had no interest in hardening schools against potential attacks in the future. They want to take away your rights and your ability to defend yourself. Period.

If you want to ignore what is happening and where it will ultimately end if we’re not careful, it’s a free country and that is your prerogative. Just don’t whine when the country is no longer free and they come knocking at your door and you have no means of resisting them when they tell you to get on the trains headed to reeducation camps.



And we Know, On the Fringe, and more- June 3

 



Evening. Here's tonight's news:


COVID restrictions stunted kids' immune systems, could explain surge of other illnesses

One of Dr. Anthony Fauci's scientists blames lockdowns, masking, distancing, "widespread use of disinfectants" for weakened immunity, possible role in surge of RSV and pediatric hepatitis.

For two years and counting, the scientific and medical establishments have urged Americans at all risk levels to limit their exposure to the microbial world to effectively reduce the spread of COVID-19, rather than focus on protecting the vulnerable.

The unexpected surge of other pathogens starting last summer, however, has challenged the wisdom of frequent sanitizing, social distancing, remote work and education, and routine mask-wearing, especially applied to children.

Infectious disease experts who waged a lonely crusade against the evasion consensus are now finding more mainstream attention for their arguments. Another is even calling for the CDC to be stripped of power for failure to properly study the effectiveness of various COVID mitigations.

Societies that tried to avoid COVID have "far less recently acquired immunity" and now face "wonkiness" in immune responses to routinely circulating pathogens, epidemics journalist and onetime CDC embed Helen Braswell wrote in health publisher STAT last week.

The evasion strategy may help explain the untimely surges of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in kids last summer and this spring's flu hospitalizations, as well as monkeypox's spread far beyond Africa, she said. An otherwise mild adenovirus may have played a role in an unprecedented spate of "severe hepatitis in healthy young children."

Dutch scientists told STAT that children are at particular risk because so many have barely had microbial exposure beyond their households. 

Marion Koopman's team at Erasmus Medical Center's Department of Viroscience found a dearth of antibodies to common respiratory viruses in young children's blood, while clinical virologist Hubert Nesters suspects pregnant mothers who sheltered more than usual passed on fewer antibodies to children born during the pandemic.

Lockdowns, masking, distancing and "widespread use of disinfectants" worsened a long-term trend of decreasing "microbial diversity" partly caused by already "ubiquitous" sanitizing protocols and likely contributed to the pediatric RSV and hepatitis surges, according to National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases scientist Margery Smelkinson, a recurring thorn in the side of Anthony Fauci, and zoonotic disease researcher Leslie Bienen.

"Children are excluded from school because they have runny noses, when it is precisely children's exposure to other kids with runny noses that creates a robust immune system when they reach adulthood," they wrote in Future Tense, a partnership of Slate, New America and Arizona State University.

"Ironically, staying inside where we are exposed to fewer microbes and fewer people ... likely contributes to the poor immunity" against COVID, even apart from related weight gain and higher alcohol consumption, said the duo, which has previously collaborated.

NIAID didn't answer a request to respond to its scientist's criticism of the general approach promoted by the agency's leader. (Smelkinson previously told Just the News she doesn't include her affiliation in her writing because most publications won't include a government-required disclaimer.)

The CDC should lose its regulatory powers for failure to conduct cluster randomized controlled trials on COVID mitigation measures such as masking kids, "3 vs 6 ft distancing" if at all, and the effect of open windows and plexiglass on transmission, University of California San Francisco epidemiologist Vinay Prasad wrote in his newsletter Thursday.

"A federal agency that makes policy that refuses to conduct studies is not one that follows science," he said. "It follows politics."

The CDC didn't answer a request for its response to Prasad's criticism.

Bienen, who teaches in the public health school jointly run by Oregon Health and Science University and Portland State, told Just the News she's "not super hopeful" that policies will shift away from "COVID as the only metric" and consider what frontline workers are seeing. 

She noted U.K. researcher Alasdair Munro just observed "a children's emergency department shift full of cases of bronchiolitis, RSV wheeze and gastroenteritis. IN THE SUMMER." Bienen suspects the second consecutive summer of RSV is likely due to children leaving another school year of strict COVID mitigation.

Her own Portland is seeing "a bit of slippage" away from strict personal COVID mitigation and toward more socializing even with COVID cases surprisingly highin the region, which has low natural infection and high vaccination rates, though hospitalizations are less so. Bienen said she's pleased that school mask mandates haven't come back.

University of Guelph viral immunologist Byram Bridle, who warned about lockdown's risk to children's immune systems a year ago, challenged the renewed masking of children, by mandate and parental choice, in his newsletter this week.

"Isolating a young child from non-dangerous microbes in their environment compromises the 'immunoregulatory' components of their immune system" and puts them at heightened risk from "allergies, asthma, and autoimmune diseases," he wrote. 

The whole complement of COVID mitigations is producing "a micro-generation of children who will have been isolated like no other human beings in history," Bridle said.

In a recent newsletter on "Germophobes to the Left and Right," Indiana University immunologist Steve Templeton said microbial fears seem to increase as "major improvements in sanitation and antimicrobial therapies" become available.

Last summer's pediatric RSV surge is "a perfect example of how viral infections weren't eliminated by social distancing, merely delayed," he told Just the News.

While it's good to see most people "go back to the pre-pandemic normal way of thinking about their risks of infection," a subset will "continue to amplify the risks of transmission, mild infection, or even any microbial exposure," Templeton said. Exposure to "reassuring information" like Smelkinson and Bienen's essay can help these people "out of this cycle of destructive thinking."



Joe Biden's Approval Hits Another Record Low, His Answer Is to Call You Stupid


Bonchie reporting for RedState 

Joe Biden has hit a brand new low in approval, not just in a single poll that someone could claim is an outlier, but in the overall average. RealClearPolitics now has the president clocking in at -14.9 percent net job approval with a topline result of just 40.0 percent.

In the last ten polls taken, Biden managed to break 43 percent a single time (YouGov, a notoriously friendly pollster has him at 44 percent). In around half of the ten polls listed, he is approval is in the 30s.

What we are seeing in regards to public opinion on the president is uncharted territory. Yes, Donald Trump had some really bad polling results, but he typically hung out in the low to mid-40s with a differential somewhere around -10 percent. That’s nothing to brag about, but Biden has somehow managed to do worse, not just for a short period, but consistently.

Worse for the White House — and Democrats running in November — is that there’s no hope on the horizon. Because the economy was driven off such a cliff, stagflation is going to be a reality for some time as interest rates rise to tame price increases.

I have good news, though. Biden has come up with a solution: Calling you stupid.

The purpose of the June pivot appears threefold:

1. To convince skeptical voters that, despite their current misgivings, the economy is actually doing quite well.

2. To calm fears about inflation and reassure both everyday Americans and major economic players that Biden has a plan to address it.

3. To thwart GOP efforts to try to hang inflation like an albatross around Democrats ahead of the midterms — and maybe even go on offense by accusing the GOP of pushing policies that will make the economy worse.

“The economy is actually doing quite well” they scream as inflation crushes everyone, GDP shrinks, and interest rates rise. Sure, you are paying 20 percent more for groceries, and gas prices are high enough to make you cry, but things are just grand, according to the Biden administration. In other words, you are just too stupid to understand that what you are feeling and experiencing on a daily basis isn’t real, even though it’s objectively real.

As to Biden having a plan to tamp down inflation, he has no plan. It’s abundantly clear he has no plan, and I know that because he admits he has no plan. Reaffirming the “independence” of the fed is not a plan. Forgiving student loan debt is not a plan. In fact, the latter will just increase inflation.

In the face of all this bad news, the administration wants to gaslight you, telling you to not believe your lying eyes. That’s a bold messaging strategy. Let’s see how it works out for them.



US World War II veterans return to Normandy to mark 78th anniversary of D-Day

 U.S. veterans of World War II, many in their mid-90s, touched down Thursday in Normandy, France, as part of the upcoming 78th anniversary of the D-Day landings. This is the first time some of the veterans have returned to France since the Normandy landings on June 6, 1944.  


U.S. veterans of World War II touched down Thursday in Normandy, France, as part of the upcoming 78th anniversary of the D-Day landings. The former soldiers, many of them in their mid-90s, arrived on a Delta Air Lines nonstop flight from Atlanta to Deauville Airport, the first time a U.S. passenger airline has flown there nonstop.

“Delta is privileged to have played our part in bringing these brave veterans back to Northern France with members of their families for this special week of remembrance," said Bob Somers, Delta's S.V.P. of Global Sales. "We are very proud of our partnership with Best Defense Foundation. Their philosophy of taking care of those who took care of us is wholeheartedly shared by Delta and our employees."  


This is the first time some of the veterans have returned to France since the Normandy landings on June 6, 1944, which marked a significant turning point for the Allies in World War II.

In partnership with community partner Best Defense Foundation, the World War II veterans, accompanied by veterans from Delta and Michelin, were greeted by local dignitaries at a special welcome event that opened a week-long program of remembrance to mark the D-Day landings.

“We're honored to welcome back U.S. veterans to our beautiful coastal town," said Phillipe Augier, mayor of Deauville and first V.P. of the Syndicat Mixte of Deauville Normandy Airport. "This place holds deeply personal memories of their time here, and we are forever grateful to them.”  

Sophie Gaugain, V.P. of the Normandy region, noted the critical role the veterans played "has a special place in French hearts and in our region's history. It is the resting place for the many servicemen who laid down their lives for our future, and we are honored to welcome them back to our region today.”

U.S. Ambassador Denise Campbell Bauer echoed that sentiment: "They played a critical role in ensuring that the bonds that bind our nations together and our common desire for freedom - even through turbulent times - remain stronger than ever.” 

During their stay, a number of the veterans will receive the French Légion d'honneur, the highest French order of merit. Other official commemoration events include parades in the towns of Sainte-Mère-Église and Carentan and a commemorative parachute jump at La Fière. This once-in-a-lifetime trip is supported by Delta Air Lines and Michelin, as part of a shared long-standing commitment to veterans. Michelin, the leading mobility company, will be sponsoring two dining receptions for the veterans.  

“Three generations have grown up since the landings took place," said Donnie Edwards, founder and president of the Best Defense Foundation. "Yet, 78 years on, today is just as important as the first anniversary. We thank these veterans for their service, and the freedom for which they fought."  




https://news.delta.com/us-world-war-ii-veterans-return-normandy-mark-78th-anniversary-d-day

CNN Delivers Devastating Blow to Biden and the Dems' Dreams for Midterms


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

Joe Biden is just getting killed in the approval numbers, when it comes to what Americans think of him.

As we’ve seen, Biden is throwing a tantrum over the fact that his numbers are now lower than those of President Donald Trump–when it’s Trump who is constantly attacked by the media.

A lot of that low rating is tied to inflation, and we’ve seen how horrible the Biden team’s response has been on that. They have no competent response.

But when you’ve lost CNN, you know you’re in trouble if you’re a Democrat.

One of the few people who doesn’t seem afraid to lay out all the bad facts over there is Harry Enten, their senior data guy. What was surprising was Jake Tapper seemed to be asking the right questions of Enten. Together, they produced a devastating takedown of Joe Biden — what Americans think of him when it comes to gas prices and inflation — and what that means for the midterms.


Enten noted the percentage that gas prices up from the prior year in prior midterms. He noted that it was 53 percent over last year — the highest in any midterm cycle since 1994. Then he dropped the hammer, showing the result of what that meant in the elections for the next two highest numbers in 2006 and 2010, where there were major gains for the opposition party.

Enten then explained Biden’s job approval on gas prices is 31 percent, with 68 percent disapproval.

“On inflation, it’s 28 percent; with 68 percent disapproving. That is a very, very, very, very, very bad number,” Enten explained, when Americans say that the most urgent issue to them is inflation, at 33 percent–far and away outpacing abortion. So, if Democrats thought that pro-abortion anger was going to win it for them, they might need to think again.

Enten notes that Republicans are “wisely” focusing on inflation. Meanwhile, what are Democrats doing? Pushing radical social issues, a move which makes Americans all the more convinced that Biden and the Democrats don’t care about how Americans are being crushed by Biden’s policies.

“Tell us more about what happens when voters have this dismal a view of the economy,” Tapper asked. That’s when Enten lowered the boom. He explained that 85 percent thought the economy was only fair or poor (worst result since 2011), and 77 percent (the worst since 2009) thought it was getting worse. “These are historic numbers,” he declared.

So, just how bad is that red tsunami going to wipe out the Democrats? When 75 percent think the economy is just fair or poor, “The White House lost.” In 2014, they lost 13 seats, in 2010 it was 63 seats, and in 1994, it was 54 seats.

I previously reported how Cook Political Report believes Republicans are going to pick-up between 20 to 35 seats. I think they’re too conservative, and it’s more in line with the wipeouts in 1994 and 2010. But either way, it’s going to be a devastating blow to the hopes and dreams of the Democrats and Joe Biden in November.



Gas Prices Set 16th New Record High Since Biden’s Release From Emergency Oil Reserves



Gas prices maintained their post-Memorial Day surge Thursday, soaring past new records beyond the holiday peak.

According to the AAA travel agency’s gas tracker, the nationwide average for a gallon of regular unleaded on Thursday was $4.71, a four-cent spike from Wednesday, at $4.67, which was up five cents from an average $4.62 on Tuesday. Diesel prices remained high Thursday at $5.55 per gallon, just two cents from its all-time high set in mid-May at $5.57.

Gas prices had already climbed upward with record-setting prices nearly every day for more than two weeks straight, as of last week. These most recent spikes mark the 16th new record since Biden’s release of oil reserves.

In Japan last week, President Joe Biden celebrated the rising gas prices as “an incredible transition.”

“When it’s over, we’ll be stronger and the world will be stronger and less reliant on fossil fuels,” the president said, days after the administration canceled more oil and gas projects from Alaska to the Gulf of Mexico.

Americans are confronting the high gas prices as they cope with inflation at a four-decade high at the same time. According to the Department of Labor, overall prices are up 8.3 percent from last year. Energy prices are up more than 30 percent with Biden to blame for the economic turbulence now threatening to send us into a recession.

High power prices drive up inflation with increased costs for transportation and manufacturing. Prices for diesel, critical for tankers, trains, trucks, and farming machinery, will hit Americans downstream after drivers suffer sticker shock at the pump. Analysts at JPMorgan Chase estimate Americans could pay an average $6.20 per gallon of regular unleaded by August. Residents in California already eclipsed that number this week, now paying $6.21 per gallon on average. No other state is paying more than $5.50, and residents in Georgia are enjoying the lowest prices at $4.19 per gallon, according to AAA.

To artificially suppress gas prices, President Biden ordered the “unprecedented” release of 1 million barrels of oil per day from the nation’s emergency petroleum reserves for 180 days. The release began on May 15 and will run through November to coincide with the fall midterms. Gas prices, however, reached new daily consecutive records for more than a week immediately following the release, and continue to surge after the traditional spring peak on Memorial Day.

According to the Energy Information Administration, Americans use about 20 million barrels of oil per day. 



Bill Barr's New Remarks About Durham Make Peter Strzok Melt Down


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

Former Attorney General Bill Barr is still backing Special Counsel John Durham, despite the jury returning a not guilty verdict in the case against Michael Sussmann for lying to the FBI about not having a client when he brought them the debunked Alfa Bank smear against the Trump team.

Barr praised Durham and the job he did. He also said that while Durham didn’t get a conviction against Sussmann, he brought out some important truths.

“I’m very proud of John Durham. And I do take responsibility for his appointment,” Barr told Fox News host Jesse Watters. “I think he and his team did an exceptionally able job both digging out very important facts and presenting a compelling case to the jury.” [….]

“First, I think he crystallized the central role played by the Hillary campaign and launching as a dirty trick the whole Russiagate collusion narrative and fanning the flames of it,” he said. “And, second, I think he exposed really dreadful behavior by the supervisors in the FBI, the senior ranks of the FBI, who knowingly used this information to start an investigation of Trump and then duped their own agents by lying to them and refusing to tell them what the real source of that information was. And that was appalling.”

Barr continued.

Pressed by Watters on the frustration of people who “feel like they were cheated out of accountability” by Durham not getting a conviction, Barr stressed that criminal liability isn’t the only factor at play in the special counsel inquiry.

“People have done, I think, a very good job trying to develop this case in the face of very strong headwinds,” Barr said. “And part of this operation is to try to get the real story out. And I have said from the beginning, you know, if we can get convictions, if they are achievable, then John Durham will achieve them. But the other aspect of this is to get the story out. And I think the Danchenko prosecution is going to further amplify these themes and the role that the FBI leadership played in this, which is increasingly looking fishy and explicable.” [….]

“The FBI was aware that the primary source of it — they had suspected of being a Russian intelligence agent,” Barr said. “So the prospect that this was Russian disinformation fed through Hillary’s campaign is very real and was never looked into by Mueller even though he had all the relevant facts.”

Barr had previously also termed “seditious” what was done to the Trump team and the United States on the head of this.

Perhaps cold comfort when we’re looking to hold people accountable and when we wish Barr would have brought all this out when he was in office. But Barr is right that there’s a greater point that was proven here — that the Clinton campaign was behind smearing Trump to the media and Sussmann spread this to the FBI. Mook admitted Clinton authorized the smear to the media. So they can no longer get around it.

The Danchenko indictment is still pending and it has appeared that Durham is trying to lay the groundwork to get the smaller folks first to flip on the bigger fish. Danchenko was the key source behind the Steele dossier and that prosecution is likely to bring out more about the start of the investigation.

Danchenko, a United States-based and Soviet Union-born researcher, allegedly relied on a network of Russian contacts and undermined key Trump-Russia collusion claims when interviewed by the FBI. He was previously investigated as a possible threat to national security due to potential Russian intelligence contacts, per documents declassified by Barr and released in September 2020. Danchenko anonymously sourced a claim about Trump 2016 campaign manager Paul Manafort to longtime Clinton ally Chuck Dolan, who spent many years, including 2016, doing work for Russian businesses and the Russian government, according to Durham’s false statements charges.

We also may yet see a “Durham report” that lays it all out because Durham’s appointment laid out that he would submit a final report for “public dissemination.”

But guess who piped up, spreading disinformation about Barr’s remarks? Disgraced, fired former FBI official Peter Strzok.

Durham’s charge wasn’t only to get “convictions”; it was also to get to the truth and he’s done that. That’s what the Clinton team and the people on the left are upset about. Strzok claiming that Durham was getting out a “false Russia narrative” after all the evidence presented that showed the Clinton team’s involvement in the smear is laughable and once again, it shows how compromised he was. He can’t handle the truth.

Strzok got leveled by many for his spin, including by Svetlana Lokhova. We’ve written before about Lokhova, here.

But his response shows how invested they are in still spreading bull, even after the truth has been exposed.



Absolute Chaos Inside the White House Ensues, as the Backstabbing Begins


Bonchie reporting for RedState 

Over the last several days, a deluge of insider stories dropped about the inner workings of the White House. Needless to say, none of them have painted a positive picture.

On Wednesday, news of infighting between Joe Biden and his staff broke, leaving the obvious question of who is actually in charge. One complaint revolved around the president’s handlers constantly coming behind him to change his statements. Another centered on Biden being so ill-informed about the various, mostly self-inflicted crises that have plagued his tenure.

Now, another report via CNN is offering more details about just how chaotic things are. With the White House adrift, the backstabbing has commenced.

That’s in between pointing fingers at each other for whose fault it is. They have the same internal meetings over and over, insisting that they need to change up their whole approach to how they’re using Biden – and then each time watch as nothing changes.

Older aides dismiss the younger aides as being too caught up in the tweet-by-tweet thinking they say lost the 2020 election for everyone else. Younger aides give up – what’s the point of working up innovative ideas, they ask themselves, if the ideas constantly get knocked down and the aides get looked down on for suggesting them?

The division between the younger and older staffers is notable. Biden has long surrounded himself with a squad of yes men, including current Chief of Staff Ron Klain, that have always told him what he wants to hear. Over the decades, they’ve grown incredibly controlling as well. Those who joined the administration to fill out its ranks have found themselves constantly being shot down, while the older generation of Biden apparatchiks plods ahead doing things the way they’ve always done them.

That’s not to say that the younger staffers are right in their strategic suggestions. Sometimes, there is no right answer because the president is an addled, senile man who is clearly incapable of fulfilling the duties of his office. Are more social media hits going to help Biden’s approval? Of course not, and color me skeptical that there’s some magic elixir of messaging and image crafting that will fix what ails the administration.

Regardless, the divisions run deep, and nothing in CNN’s write-up on the situation should lead anyone to believe there’s light at the end of the tunnel.

They’ll say he’s answering reporters’ questions whenever he’s asked, while nixing interview requests to avoid the hours of prep and possible clean-up. They’ll acknowledge that Biden himself feels shut off enough that he’s quietly had a half-dozen sessions with favored writers since the fall, like last month’s lunch with the New York Times’ Tom Friedman, in which the columnist shared his own impressions of Biden’s off-the-record thoughts, with only the tuna sandwich, fruit bowl and milkshake approved for publication.

In a January memo, White House chief of staff Ron Klain offered a compromise plan, to have Biden do one town hall each month to at least grab some unscripted moments and media exposure. That got sucked into the maw of blaming and dysfunction like so much else: Some aides embraced the idea for at least shaking things up a little, some mocked it for being an outdated idea, some complained that the logistics of making that happen would be impossibly time consuming.

In the end, not a single town hall was scheduled. A White House aide said Wednesday that now more town halls are expected in the near future.

Klain’s idea to do town halls is not surprising, given how politically inept he is. The last thing that will help Biden is propping him up for an hour a month on cable news–having him repeat the same tired talking points–while delivering nothing but negative results for the American people. Again, I tend to look past the disagreement among his staffers being described here, coming to the conclusion that the president himself is the problem.

That’s made obvious by the mention that they won’t let him do interviews for fear of having to do hours of “clean-up.” When the man in charge can’t even be trusted to sit down with friendly media, it should be obvious how much trouble the administration is.

Still, I’d frame all of these insider reports as mostly deflections. Take this paragraph as an example.

At the center is a president still trying to calibrate himself to the office. The country is pulling itself apart, pandemic infections keep coming, inflation keeps rising, a new crisis on top of new crisis arrives daily and Biden can’t see a way to address that while also being the looser, happier, more sympathetic, lovingly Onion-parody inspiring, aviator-wearing, vanilla chip cone-licking guy – an image that was the core of why he got elected in the first place.

“He has to speak to very serious things,” explained one White House aide, “and you can’t do that getting ice cream.”

Yes, the chaos is real. Yes, Biden has serious staffing issues. Yet, the biggest problem remains the man sitting on the set of his fake Oval Office. This isn’t a messaging problem. It’s not bad luck. Rather, Biden is just a horrible, arrogant leader who can’t get out of his own way. Thinking that slapping aviators on him and having him eat ice cream is going to change public perception is delusional.

On the other hand, putting him on national TV with his serious face on isn’t going to do anything either. Because again, Biden himself is the problem. Even the best strategy in the world can’t take a mouse and turn it into a lion.



JPMorgan Chase CEO Warns to Prepare for Economic Hurricane as Biden Admin Switches U.S. Economy to Green New Deal Agenda


JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon warned of a “hurricane” as the economy struggles against fiscally induced growth, quantitative tightening and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Mr Dimon was delivering remarks at a conference sponsored by Alliance Bernstein Holdings Wednesday.

Higher oil prices, higher fuel prices, higher energy prices and much higher food prices are all looming over the horizon as the Biden administration switches the baseline for the U.S economy from oil and gas to the Green New Deal energy program. Things are going to get worse, the question is, how much worse? WATCH:


The White House is pretending the U.S. government does not have full control over what is happening in the economy.  The media are pretending not to know that the White House is avoiding admitting the agenda and economic pain is intentional and unavoidable.  The republican politicians are pretending the Biden economic transition program is because the White House is incompetent.  All of these -and so many more- are just pretenses.

What is being done by the government, in this decision to switch from an oil and gas economy into a wind and solar economy, is being done on purpose. Yes, everyone at every level of government, both political parties and every agency within it, and the entirety of the corporate media are pretending not to know this is the Green New Deal taking place.