Tuesday, May 17, 2022

Agriculture, Fuel Costs, and the Price Hikes to Come

There is nothing green for the farming community in the era of the Green New Deal: only red ink and high costs, which means the cost of food will continue to rise.


I am an aerial applicator from Nebraska. What the heck is that, you might ask? I apply pesticides and fertilizer to crops throughout the summer months with an airplane to help farmers maximize their yields. This allows them to feed not only the United States, but also half the world. Aircraft are just another tool for farmers to keep our food supply affordable, plentiful, and safe. Aerial application is very common throughout the United States and the rest of the world. Anywhere there is commercial agriculture, you will more than likely see an airplane or helicopter flying back and forth doing their thing with precision and skill. 

There are approximately 2,500 ag pilots in the United States who cover millions of acres each year from California to Florida and everywhere else in between. Ag aircraft are useful for everything from spreading dry fertilizer and seeding crops such as rice to applying liquid pesticides and fertilizers. They are even called upon to fight fires by dropping borate or water to extinguish wildfires and save property and lives.      

The ag aircraft I operate run on Jet-A fuel, which is the same fuel used in airliners and is a refined form of diesel fuel. Americans concerned about rising food prices should know that my cost for Jet-A has gone up 200 percent over past year. The last 8,600-gallon tanker load I purchased was $4.65 a gallon, which cost me $40,000. Naturally, the truck driver wanted a check before he left. 

During the height of spray season, my company will operate three aircraft, each burning around 60 gallons per hour. That is one gallon of fuel burned per minutefor each aircraft for a total of between 160-180 gallons an hour. This year, it will cost me around $900 an hour and could easily be $10,000 for the day in fuel costs alone. This cost will be passed along to the farmer, or to a corporate farm operation, both of which will try to pass this onto the end consumer—which is you. That means your food costs will go up dramatically. 

Probably not what you wanted to hear but this is the reality we are all living in now.

Fuel is not the only thing that has increased dramatically in cost in recent months. So have the costs of pesticides and the fertilizers we apply for the farmers. Take, for example, glyphosate which almost every non-organic commercial farmer in this country uses. This is a broad-spectrum herbicide used to desiccate invasive weeds and grasses that would compete for vital moisture and nutrients needed to grow healthy, high-yielding crops. Last year this herbicide cost the farmer around $20 a gallon. This year it cost upward of $70 a gallon and because of supply chain disruptions, it is in very limited supply. 

Every input cost for the farmer has increased substantially this year. This inevitably leads to the question, “Why don’t farmers just grow organic crops and do away with all the pesticide and fertilizer costs?” The simple answer is this: “How much of your income do you want to spend on groceries, and which poor countries will we decide to let starve??” 

Unless people grow it themselves, organic food is a luxury that wealthy people in countries such as the United States can afford simply because some have enough disposable income to spend on such items. The poorest countries, which make up the bulk of the population of the world, just want something to eat. The only way we can produce enough food to feed a big part of the world is by using traditional farming practices that involve pesticides, fertilizers, GMOs—and, of course, aerial application.  

So why the war on fossil fuels? Why did Joe Biden cancel the Keystone XL Pipeline as soon as he took office? Given all that we’ve seen, I have to assume the current administration wants high fuel prices. I have seen nothing to give me hope fuel prices are going down anytime soon. 

Is the point to make everyone get excited to go out and buy a new electric car? If so, I have news for them. I can’t go out and purchase a new electric ag plane. They don’t exist. Until Elon Musk can figure out how to make batteries lighter and hold enough charge to produce 750 horsepower all day long, my ag plane will be burning fossil fuels. 

The drive to eliminate fossil feuls and “decarbonize” the economy is unsustainable and will have consequences most Americans have not even considered. If we don’t change course, it has the potential to absolutely destroy our economy and country. Fossil fuels are the lifeblood of any modern economy and will be for the foreseeable future. To think we can just eliminate them by willing it so is the stuff of fantasyland. There is nothing green for the farming community in the era of the Green New Deal: only red ink and high costs, which means the cost of food will continue to increase.



X22, On the Fringe, and more- May 17

 



5 state primaries tonight! Here's a handy dandy list of candidates to keep an eye out for: (hope it's handy dandy, cuz Gateway tends to make easy errors)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/trump-endorsed-candidates-tuesdays-state-primary-elections-get-vote/

Godspeed to all conservatives out there tonight! 

Here's tonight's news:


No Data Supports Threat of ‘White Supremacists’

Joe Biden will use the blood of innocents to paint millions of Americans as “white supremacists” and wannabe terrorists simply for supporting the opposite political party.


Joe Biden will travel to Buffalo on Tuesday, ostensibly to join the upstate New York community in mourning the murders of 10 people at a local grocery store over the weekend. It is, of course, appropriate for Biden in his role as president to grieve with Americans devastated by such a brutal massacre of innocents, especially an attack that from all accounts was racially motivated.

What’s not appropriate is for Biden to use the atrocity as a platform to fuel even more hatred and division in a country ripping apart at the seams in so many ways—but that’s exactly what he will do. The man who launched his 2020 campaign for president touting the lie that Donald Trump commended “very fine” white supremacists after a 2017 protest in Charlottesville can be expected to promote another lie; violent white supremacists and domestic extremists pose a heightened threat to the country.

That tired mantra remains an animating feature of the Biden regime. On his second full day in office, Biden instructed his national security team to devise a whole-of-government approach to combat “domestic terrorism,” largely using the events of January 6, 2021 as the pretext. White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki promised a “fact-based analysis upon which we can shape policy” when she announced the initiative on January 22, 2021.

But the 32-page report, issued by Merrick Garland’s Justice Department during a public ceremony in June, was long on rhetoric and very short on facts. 

While noting mass shootings committed by white men in Charleston, Pittsburgh, and El Paso, the analysis failed to prove what it described as a “persistent and emerging” threat of domestic terrorism. (The authors also claimed the “victims [of] the U.S. Capitol” join the “tragic history” of American terror attacks including the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing which killed 168 people including children.)

Further, the unrelated handful of acts took place over a six-year period, hardly representative of a systemic pattern of white-on-black violence. Horrible and sickening? Yes. Carnage that merits the harshest punishment possible for the perpetrators? Yes.

But is it representative of a pervasive threat requiring the use of intrusive government and private sector surveillance tools once reserved for foreign terrorists? No.

Of course, “domestic violent extremists” or “white supremacists” is political code for Trump supporters. What else could explain the report’s omission of violent extremists associated with Black Lives Matter or Antifa? It’s not an accident that on the one-year anniversary of the most destructive riots in the nation’s history, Biden’s missive failed to make a single mention of the damage, death, or nationwide campaign of terror unleashed in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death in 2020.

No matter how hard Democrats, the news media, and establishment Republicans such as U.S. Representative Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.)—who blamed Republican House leaders on Monday morning for enabling “white nationalism, [and] white supremacy”—try to twist the matter, the data simply does not support these accusations. 

The most current figures available are from 2020, one of the most tumultuous years in U.S. history. And rather than telling the story of a country under siege by bloodthirsty white supremacists, the metrics, if accurate—and that’s a big ifconsidering the designation of a hate crime is based on the subjective determination of the charging agency—contradict the narrative. With more than 15,000 local law enforcement agencies reporting, the FBI tallied 8,263 hate crime incidents for that year.

Roughly half, according to the FBI’s crime data explorer, were motivated by anti-black or anti-African American sentiment. And of the 4,082 offenses against blacks in 2020, the top offense was “intimidation.” A little more than 1,200 offenses were for assault; just five were categorized as murder or manslaughter.

And 1,710 out of 2,353 perpetrators were white.

Racially motivated crime would be nonexistent in an ideal world, however, that’s not the world in which we live—particularly as the ruling class, corporate news organizations, and social media platforms bang the drums of a race war on a daily basis. The individual cases may be troubling but in no way do they incriminate an entire race or political party, much less do they support the narrative of a rampant “white supremacist” crime spree.

Information from the Justice Department is even more unconvincing. On its hate crime home page, the agency listed 30 examples of federal hate crime cases for 2021. Of the nine offenses related to race, four took place in 2021; the rest occured in previous years but were adjudicated in 2021—hardly a compelling trove of evidence for a department attempting to persuade the public that dangerous white supremacist terrorists are ready to strike at any moment.

More specific data isn’t forthcoming. Overall crime statistics for 2021, including racially motivated crimes, may not be made available to the public this year—a timely gift to Democrats as voters continue to list crime as their top concern ahead of the 2022 midterm elections. 

Since the FBI switched to a new reporting system, many local law enforcement entities are opting out of the voluntary program, bringing the agency participation well below the mandatory 60 percent threshold. The FBI already skipped the first quarterly report of 2022, usually issued in late March. If participation doesn’t increase, there’s a chance subsequent reports will be missed, too.

How convenient.

There is, of course, a more political reason why the FBI won’t release crime statistics from last year; the results will contradict the administration. According to an independent analysis of three dozen police departments, hate crimes rose by 39 percent in the nation’s largest cities in 2021 with the top 10 metropolitan areas reporting a staggering 54 percent increase over 2020.

The rise, however, is due to a huge uptick in hate crimes against Asians and Jews. Data crunched by the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino shows a 224 percent increase in anti-Asian hate crimes; a 58 percent increase in anti-Jewish hate crimes; and a 51 percent increase in anti-gay hate crimes. News reports out of major cities support the data; a wave of recent attacks in Dallas has the city’s Asian business community in a panic. Police are looking now for a black man suspected of shooting three Korean women at a hair salon last week.

But Joe Biden will not discuss any of those facts during his visit to Buffalo on Tuesday. Instead, Biden will rage against an imaginary menace. He will blame Republicans and Fox News. And he’ll demand more stringent measures, including online censorship, to prevent another attack. Biden will use the blood of innocents to paint millions of Americans as “white supremacists” and wannabe terrorists simply for supporting the other political party. Rather than comfort the heartbroken loved ones, Biden will exploit their loss for his own gratification.

There is no stoop too low for old Joe.



Biden’s Afghanistan Failure Continues

Biden’s Afghanistan Failure Continues 


The terrorist clock is still ticking in Taliban land, but that’s of no concern to our nation’s president.


Nine months after President Biden withdrew U.S. forces from Afghanistan — which happened after nearly twenty years of war there — we seem to have already unlearned all the lessons of that war and the debacle Biden created in quitting the field.

Far more importantly, as the congressional testimony of Biden administration officials demonstrates, we have not — as Biden claimed — eliminated al-Qaeda’s (and other terrorist networks’) capacity to mount attacks on the U.S. from Afghanistan.

Colin Kahl, undersecretary of defense for policy, told the Senate Armed Services Committee in October that the Islamic State in Khorasan province (ISIS-K) could generate the capability to mount terrorist attacks against us in six to twelve months. It’s been seven months since that testimony.

Last week, Lt. Gen. Scott Berrier, head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, and Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines both told the Senate Armed Services Committee that terrorist groups were six months to a year away from being able to mount terrorist attacks against the United States.

Both seemed more concerned about ISIS-K than about al-Qaeda. Berrier said it would take ISIS-K about a year and al-Qaeda a bit longer to reach that capability. (ISIS-K is supposedly an enemy of the Taliban and mounted many attacks on the Taliban while U.S. troops were in Afghanistan. That enmity is apparently at an end.)

Haines, speaking of ISIS-K, said, “They could build that capability over time, and they certainly have the intent to do so.”

It’s simply undeniable that al-Qaeda and other terrorist networks have that same intent. 

Let’s make the anti-historical assumption that our intelligence community is correct and that it’s giving us the straight scoop. What both sets of testimony mean is that, as this column has stated many times, the Afghanistan war didn’t end just because President Biden decided to quit the fight.

Then-president Trump signed a peace agreement with the Taliban on February 29, 2020. It was a lousy deal. It boiled down to two points. First, that we would withdraw all of our coalition forces from Afghanistan by the end of 2020. Second, that the Taliban would ensure that Afghanistan would no longer give terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda and ISIS-K safe havens so that they could mount terrorist attacks against the U.S. and Coalition allies.

As I wrote at the time, there was no possibility that the Taliban would live up to their obligations under the agreement. That’s because, as I’ve written more often than I care to recall, in the war in Afghanistan, and the other wars we have fought in Iraq and Syria, we faced and failed to defeat religiously motivated enemies either kinetically or ideologically. Their ideology compels their war against us. Until that ideological war is won, the war goes on regardless of what we say or do.

Trump’s agreement was full of holes. The deadline for our withdrawal was extended to May 2021. Biden decided — against the facts on the ground — to precipitously withdraw all Coalition forces from Afghanistan in August of last year.

The withdrawal was a debacle. The Afghanistan security forces folded far more quickly than our intelligence community said they would, Ashraf Ghani, Afghanistan’s president, fled the country before Kabul fell to the Taliban, and thirteen U.S. soldiers were killed in a bombing attack at the Kabul airport.

Thousands of U.S. civilians were abandoned by Biden. Their fate is still unknown.

On August 31, 2021, Biden gave a speech that declared the withdrawal an “extraordinary success.” He said we remained committed to getting the rest of our civilians out and that one hundred countries had joined us in our determination to do so.

Biden said, “We will maintain the fight against terrorism in Afghanistan and other countries. We just don’t need to fight a ground war to do it. We have what’s called over-the-horizon capabilities, which means we can strike terrorists and targets without American boots on the ground — or very few, if needed.”

The problem with Biden’s “over-the-horizon” strategy, as I pointed out at the time, is that we now lack the in-country intelligence that would make that strategy possible. One of the reasons for that is that it takes hours for a military strike to reach Afghanistan from another nation or from our ships at sea. Those hours can easily mean a miss rather than a hit.

The other main problem with Biden’s strategy is that someone — Biden — has to pull the trigger on any such strike. And he hasn’t.

Afghanistan is about the size of Texas. It’s a mountainous country ruled by the Taliban and the many tribes sympathetic to the Taliban. There are thousands of places for terrorists to hide, train, and to mount terrorist attacks against the U.S. and our allies. It has reverted to its pre-9/11 policy of giving safe haven to terrorist networks.

Even without in-country intelligence gathering capabilities, we can still provide some semblance of terror suppression in Afghanistan.

We can, and should, permanently position at least a couple of spy satellites over Afghanistan. They would enable us in real time to see and listen to what the terrorist networks are doing there. But satellites are limited. They cannot give us the kind of penetrating intelligence that real spies on the ground can. Flights over Afghanistan by U-2 aircraft would help gather that kind of intelligence.

We can, if Biden were willing to authorize such strikes, use the various kinds of cruise missiles to destroy terrorist training camps as they arise. Bill Clinton infamously declined to kill Osama bin Laden when the CIA had him literally in its sights.

Biden won’t do that because he’s still congratulating himself on ending the war in Afghanistan. He won’t, by authorizing cruise missile strikes, admit that the war there isn’t over.

Hamza bin Laden, Osama’s son, was killed in a 2019 raid authorized by former president Trump. But Ayman al-Zawahiri, bin Laden’s second in command, is still at large. Al-Qaeda is reorganizing in Afghanistan with the goal of perpetrating attacks as devastating as the 9/11 attacks. So are ISIS-K and other terrorist networks. And we’re not doing a damned thing to stop them.


GAC to launch Great American Community this September


 


Source: https://www.nexttv.com/news/bill-abbotts-gac-plans-dtc-app-with-original-content-social-functions

Former Hallmark Channel head Bill Abbott, whose family-friendly GAC Media has started to build an ardent following, plans to launch a direct-to-consumer app called Great American Community that will give fans original short-form content and a social-media forum to interact with GAC’s talent.

The new app will help GAC Media get into the over-the-top space, augmenting its cable networks GAC Family and GAC Living and enabling Abbott, who started out as an ad sales exec, to offer sponsors cross-platform packages in the fall holiday season after Great American Community debuts in September.

Abbott told Broadcasting+Cable that GAC is spending about $1 million to develop the app. 

It will feature about 200 hours of content that will be exclusive to the app. Initial contributors will include Debbie Matenopoulos, Cameron Mathison, Shirley Bovshow, Kym Douglas, Maria Provenzano, Larissa Wohl, Lawrence Zarian, Toya Boudy, Amber Kemp-Gerstel, Emily Hutchinson, Mahaila McKellar, Jamie Tarence, Jen Lilley, Jill Wagner, Danica McKellar and Trevor Donovan. More are expected to join in.

At launch Great American Community will probably be free to consumers, but GAC is considering creating additional content and features that might appear on a premium tier.

“We're hopeful that we'd have a million people over the course of the quarter that would interact with the site and sign up and be part of it,” Abbott said. “It's amazing how  these fans are so passionate about the movie content and the talent. If we can provide ways in which they can interact and watch them it will be really well received.”

Great American Community will also be home to GAC Giving and Caring, a new digital series that focuses on the many ways that GAC Family talent gives back. GAC Giving and Caring will raise awareness for important causes supported by GAC stars, such as bullying prevention and pet adoption, and will encourage fans to get involved to make a difference in their communities.

GAC Media CEO Bill Abbott

Bill Abbott (Image credit: GAC Media)

Abbott started GAC Media last year, buying the cable networks Great American Country and Ride TV and converting them into family-friendly GAC Family and GAC Living. Following the Hallmark playbook, he packed GAC Family with original holiday movies featuring many stars popular with viewers of Hallmark movies and series.

The app will be a different business from the channels featuring different, short-form content, some of it from the networks’ familiar faces.

“Fans are interacting with content in different ways and we think this is the perfect time for this type of app to enter the scene,” Abbott said. “I don’t think it’s ever been done in this way. We can pull this together because of our talent relationship, a really unique group that will be creating a lot of content for us.”

GAC will promote the app on its channels, and the app will help promote the channels, their movies and other programming.

“In a world, where awareness is very hard to gain, having a platform like this does a lot of good things for the brand and organizationally for us that we need right now,” Abbott said.

The app is expected to be available in all of the major mobile app stores and on connected TV devices.

USER EXPERIENCE

Abbott said that users will sign on with a user name and password. They’ll be asked for a very limited amount of personal information.

One they’ve signed they’ll have a choice of watching a FAST-channel like feed of the app’s original channel or taking a more on demand approach to what they want to see and do.

Users will be able to search for content by talent or by categories such as cooking or decorating. There will also be seconds dedicated to seasons, holidays and the networks’ theme weeks, such as pumpkin picking in October or picking out a Christmas tree in December.

Other content on the app might include a book club, master classes and podcasts.

“We want to provide as many different entry points as we can into people's passion and interests,” Abbott said.

Programming on the app will be run by Tracy Verna, who was executive producer of Hallmark’s Home & Family daytime show under Abbott.

SOCIAL STATS

GAC fans are already active on social media. GAC Family has more than 1 million followers on Facebook, almost 300,000 followers on Twitter and 73,600 followers on Instagram. Abbott’s own handle has 12,400 followers on Twitter. Candace Cameron Bure, who signed an extensive content deal with GAC, has 5.5 million followers on Instagram and 3.6 million followers on Facebook.

The app will tap into that with a social area where fans can talk to each other and to GAC’s on-screen talent.

“That's why we call it community,” Abbott said. “We want it to be relentlessly positive. We want to take the negativity and the polarization out of the social element.”

Abbott said he’s aware of the pitfalls that can happen on a social platform and is prepared to moderate comments on the app. He said GAC has hosted movie pre-parties and after parties, and in that limited sample, there was been a minimum of negative commentary. “Unfortunately that’s the way of the world,” he said. “If you’re really looking to be negative there are other places you can go,” he said.

UPFRONT INTERACTION

Abbott has included Great American Community in GAC’s upfront pitch to advertisers. The app creates additional ways for sponsors to align or integrate with holiday-themed content. Abbott envisions the app featuring shopping tips from Debbie Matenopoolis or Christmas decorating tips from Cameron Mathison.

“If you integrate into that, and then you add the linear platform and potential sponsorship of a movie, an advertiser can really put together a cohesive strategy around getting a message with a family-friendly brand and tap into that equity for their brand,” Abbott said. “The reaction has just been universally positive from the advertising side.”

Abbott has been working out deals with GAC talent to provide content for the app. Most will be producing two short-form videos a week.

GIVING AND CARING

The app will give GAC and its talent more opportunities to promote causes through Giving And Caring.

“This is going to allow us to work with our talent to spotlight their initiatives and to educate people on things like Trevor Donovan's anti-bullying campaign,” Abbott said.

The linear model restricts how many initiatives a channel can support at one time, he said.

“At Hallmark, we had our pet rescue initiative but there were many others that we wanted to do, from autism to breast cancer, and yet, your promotional ability is really limited,” Abbot said. “In digital, it's unlimited what you can do and Giving and Caring gives us an opportunity to give back in a way that is a big part of our corporate culture. Ultimately, we have a plan to donate a certain amount of our profit back to different charities. We think that we can do a lot of good in that way.”

GAC Media is working with tech firm Yupp to build the app.

“It’s a beast to manage because you're dealing with a lot of short form content that you're rolling out consistently. It's going to be critical that we keep this content fresh and that there are new elements every day. That's a heavy lift,” Abbott said.

Yupp has been” really terrific on the tech side and how we make all of that work,” he said. ■


Liz Cheney Weaponizes Racial Division For Political Power, Baselessly Labeling GOP Leadership White Supremacist

Cheney’s post marked another milestone in her transition from a center-right lawmaker to a full-blown collaborator in the left’s cultural revolution.



Wyoming Republican Congresswoman Liz Cheney reached a new milestone in her transition from a center-right lawmaker to a full-blown collaborator in the left’s cultural revolution within 18 months. On Monday, Cheney claimed, without evidence, members of GOP House leadership where she was expelled last May are enablers of white supremacy.

“The House GOP leadership has enabled white nationalism, white supremacy, and antisemitism,” Cheney wrote on Twitter. “History has taught us that what begins with words ends in far worse. [GOP] leaders must renounce and reject these views and those who hold them.”

The post was published Monday morning after an 18-year-old shooter allegedly killed 10 people in a Buffalo supermarket on Saturday. Moments before the killing spree, in which the majority of victims were black, the white shooter published an online “manifesto” airing antisemitic grievances in 180 pages where he also showcased anxiety over “replacement.”

The racial circumstances of the tragedy make the event ripe for leftists and their allies in the corporate media and government to stoke their routine race war, smearing political dissidents as complicit in the latest episode of domestic terrorism. Those allies now include Cheney, whose competitive re-election campaign has been endorsed by Occupy Democrats and funded by the Lincoln Project.

Corporate outlets that were quick to move on from the Waukesha Christmas Massacre last fall — when a black suspect motivated by anti-white racism allegedly rammed an SUV through a holiday parade, brutally killing at least six — have been even quicker to place blame for this weekend’s New York shooting on Fox News.

The New York Times ran a 2,000-word piece Sunday tying the Buffalo attack to the modern Republican Party, Fox News, and the network’s lead prime-time host, Tucker Carlson.

“By his own account, the Buffalo suspect, Payton S. Gendron, followed a lonelier path to radicalization, immersing himself in replacement theory and other kinds of racist and antisemitic content easily found on internet forums, and casting Black Americans, like Hispanic immigrants, as ‘replacers’ of white Americans,” the Times wrote. “No public figure has promoted replacement theory more loudly or relentlessly than the Fox host Tucker Carlson, who has made elite-led demographic change a central theme of his show since joining Fox’s prime-time lineup in 2016.”

Never mind that the “manifesto” from the weekend shooting’s suspect showcased his own contempt for conservatism and Fox News while never mentioning Carlson.

That didn’t stop other outlets from following suit, capitalizing on the episode to amplify their predetermined narrative that the Republican Party, its leadership, and rival networks are to blame for another episode of politically motivated violence. The Washington Post targeted House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik in particular, who replaced Cheney in GOP leadership a year ago.

“Stefanik echoed racist theory allegedly espoused by Buffalo suspect,” headlined the paper, referring to the New York congresswoman’s objections to unchecked immigration — legitimate concerns that were even given credence by Politico.

Stefanik was indicted by the Post as a lawmaker captured by “Replacement Theory,” an idea declared conspiracy by legacy media hellbent on smearing Republicans who merely repeat the open desires of left-wing activists. Former Trump communications adviser Michael Anton outlined the irony as “The Celebration Parallax” in the American Mind.

The Left insists that concerns from certain quarters that immigration policy in America (and Europe) amounts to a ‘great replacement’ is a ‘dangerous,’ ‘evil,’ ‘racist,’ ‘false’ ‘conspiracy theory.’ But a leftist New York Times columnist can write an article entitled ‘We Can Replace Them‘ and … nothing. Same fundamental point, except she’s all for it and her targets aren’t. A U.S. Senator can exult that demographic change will doom Republicans. Joe Biden himself can refer to an ‘unrelenting stream of immigration.’ Except they’re celebrating it and calling for it. Anyone on the Right who uses the exact same words will not merely be denounced; the very fact pattern that is affirmed when Biden says it will be denied when the Rightist repeats it.

The knee-jerk reaction to cast anyone on the right as agitators of extremist violence — nuance be darned and leftist attacks be whitewashed when the profile of the suspect and the victims don’t fit the right demographics — has now drawn Cheney as new recruit, adopting the left’s double standards.

Cheney joined the media chorus to smear opponents in leadership as responsible for spilled blood in Buffalo despite the fact that House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., was almost killed by a leftist “Bernie Bro” five years ago who wanted to “terminate the Republican Party.” But yes, Liz Cheney wants you to think that Scalise is a cheerleader for extremist violence.

Wyoming’s sole representative was coopted by Democrats last summer when she enthusiastically accepted a request from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to vice chair the Select Committee on Jan. 6. Cheney’s appointment replaced Republicans selected by GOP House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, who were barred from fulfilling their congressional service by the speaker.

One of 10 Republicans in the lower chamber who supported former President Donald Trump’s second impeachment, Cheney has carved out antagonism of Republican voters as a hallmark of her time in Congress.

Cheney faces a primary challenge from Trump-endorsed attorney Harriet Hageman in August.



Inflation: The Price You Pay for Biden’s Delusions

 Inflation: 

The Price You Pay for Biden’s Delusions

Our president’s proclivity for self-deception is wreaking havoc on the economy.

When the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that inflation had risen at an annual rate of 8.3 percent in April, the White House and many news outlets made much of the minuscule decrease from the 8.5 percent rate reported for March. President Biden issued a statement, for example, that called the infinitesimal decline “heartening.” CNN ran a story titled, “US inflation slowed last month for the first time since August.” This wasn’t terribly comforting, however, considering that the inflation rate has nearly doubled since last April while real wages declined by 2.6 percent.

Nor is it “heartening” to see that Biden is still in denial about the role his administration’s spending has played in igniting inflation. Here’s a typically delusional claim he made last week in response to a reporter’s question concerning how much responsibility he accepts for the inflation spike: “I think our policies help, not hurt.… Economists think that this is going to be a real tough problem to solve, but it’s not because of spending.” That claim conflicts with the opinions of most economists, including progressives like Obama economic advisor Steven Rattner, who wrote the following in the New York Times during November of 2021:

The original sin was the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, passed in March. The bill — almost completely unfunded — sought to counter the effects of the Covid pandemic by focusing on demand-side stimulus rather than on investment. That has contributed materially to today’s inflation levels.… So the administration should come clean with voters about the impact of its spending plans on inflation.

Biden’s preposterous response to April’s inflation figures suggests that he is unlikely to do that. He still insists, for example, that high inflation in our country is symptomatic of a global trend. However, as my American Spectator colleague Daniel J. Flynn recently pointed out, this is fiction. A rational president would have stopped peddling this whopper months ago, when the Federal Reserve compared the core inflation rate in the U.S. to the rates experienced in other OECD nations and concluded, “The United States is experiencing higher rates of inflation than other advanced economies.” The chart below tells you all you need to know:

As out of touch as Biden is about the causes of inflation, his plan to fix the problem is even more delusional. Predictably, one of its major features involves tax increases. Biden takes credit for last year’s modest decrease in the federal deficit, and maintains that making corporations and the wealthy “pay their fair share” will reduce it further. But the Wall Street Journal reveals the dirty little secret about that reduction — it happened because Americans are already paying more in taxes: “Federal receipts through April rose an astonishing $843 billion from a year earlier, or 39% … Individual income taxes rose $698 billion, or 68%.”

A large part of that spike in individual income taxes is the result of illusory wage increases caused by inflation. Nominal wages have indeed increased but, as noted above, real wages have declined. Consequently, millions of individuals have incurred higher tax liabilities during the past year because their nominal incomes have gone up enough to trigger “bracket creep.” The IRS couldn’t care less if the buying power of your paycheck is lower than it was last year before you got your fake salary increase. If your “higher” salary pushed you into a more extortionate tax bracket, tough. But hey, the deficit might decrease a little. Feel better now? No?

What about Biden’s plan to lower gas prices? It’s obvious that he has no plan to ameliorate America’s pain at the pump — and the public knows it. A recent Rasmussen poll found that most voters (76 percent of Republicans, 54 percent of Independents, and 24 percent of Democrats) blame Biden for high gas prices. Yet, last week he was still insinuatingthat the problem is oil company price-gouging: “The fact is the average cost of a barrel of oil has been steady for weeks. So why do gas prices keep going up so high?” This question betrays Biden’s reality-challenged notion of how the oil market works. As another Federal Reserve report explains:

Since only 1 percent of service stations in the U.S. are owned by companies that also produce oil, U.S. oil producers are in no position to control retail gasoline prices.… Rather, the elevated retail gasoline prices must be attributed to events in the U.S. retail gasoline market beyond the control of oil producers.… Moreover, the asymmetry of the response of retail gasoline prices need not be evidence of price gouging.

In other words, Big Oil doesn’t set the amount Americans pay at the pump. The prices you are paying for gasoline today are the result of blunders Biden committed in early 2021. He declared war on fossil fuels on his first day in office. By killing the Keystone XL pipeline and restricting access to oil and gas sources like ANWR, he incentivized energy producers to be very cautious about new investments in exploration and production. As recently as last week, his administration canceled the sale of oil and gas leases in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico, thus signaling producers that they are still operating in a hostile political environment.

Biden says inflation is now his “top priority.” That’s exactly what Jimmy Carter said the last time skyrocketing prices endangered the economy. As the New York Times reported on April 11, 1978: “President Carter’s speech today elevated the fight on inflation to top priority on his list of economic problems.” At that time, the rate stood at 6.6 percent. When the voters fired Carter in November of 1980, it had risen to 12.6 percent. Biden can’t be voted out yet, so the only way to control his delusional economic policies is to fire his congressional enablers in November. He can’t spend the country into bankruptcy if the loyal opposition controls Congress.