Friday, April 15, 2022

Major endorsement in very competitive Ohio Senate race

 



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/just-trump-endorses-j-d-vance-ohio-senate-race/

President Trump on Friday endorsed J.D. Vance in the very competitive Ohio Senate race.

Trump: “It is time for the entire MAGA movement, the greatest in the history of our Country, to unite behind J.D.’s campaign … he will put America First. In other words, J.D. Vance has my Complete and Total Endorsement. He will not let you down. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

“I’m incredibly honored to have President Trump’s support. He was an incredible fighter for hard working Americans in the White House, he will be again, and I’ll fight for the America First Agenda in the Senate.” J.D. Vance said on Friday.

Recall, J.D. Vance boldly called for mass civil disobedience last year when Joe Biden announced his unconstitutional Covid vaccine mandates.

Last September Biden declared war on vaccinated Americans and demanded that ALL federal employees be vaccinated.

Biden also announced he will be forcing companies with more than 100 employees to either test workers or prove they are vaccinated.

“Do not comply with the mandates. Do not pay the government fines. Don’t allow yourself to be bullied and controlled. Only mass civil disobedience will save us from Joe Biden’s naked authoritarianism,” J.D. Vance said.

** You can donate to J.D. Vance for Senate here.

The Democrats’ BATA Boom


This donkey still kicks.


The Democrats’ approval ratings are plummeting faster than Will Smith’s movie career. In light of the looming electoral crisis in November, a midnight gathering of the Democratic family has the potential to make the tired old donkey scamper like a colt. 

Imagine the scene unfolding . . .

12:00 a.m. The chamber has a celebratory vibe as Speaker Nancy Pelosi gavels the House of Representatives to order. In attendance is every Democrat member and their rainbow of guests, plus Liz Cheney. Apparently, no other Republican member checks email after 11 p.m.

12:01 a.m. Pelosi announces her resignation, effective immediately. “I need more time with my melting portfolio,” she says. 

12:02 a.m. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson administers Barack Obama’s oath as speaker of the House. He makes history as the first former president to serve as speaker—and, by virtue of his race and his real estate holdings in Martha’s Vineyard, Hawaii, and D.C., he was clearly the correct diversity choice to succeed the pale Catholic birthing person who resigned a minute earlier. 

12:03 a.m. Kamala Harris resigns. “I need more time at the border,” she says. She thanks Speaker Obama, Joe Biden, “and many others, you know who you are,” for positioning her to become the first XX-chromosomed Jamaican-Indian American to live in Nelson Rockefeller’s old house. “I really love that house,” she sighs. 

12:04 a.m. Joe Biden resigns. “I need more time with my neurologist,” he says from the Potemkin Oval Office via Zoom. He thanks Obama, Dr. Jill Biden, and 81 million mostly peaceful, mostly living, mostly American voters for letting him fly on Marine One and tell old 18-wheeler stories

12:05 a.m. In accordance with the 25th Amendment’s line of succession, Justice Jackson administers Obama’s third presidential oath of office. He says his ascent is earthly work, constitutionally mandated, and shouldn’t be confused with the Resurrection. The assembly cheers, when someone catcalls, “At least you won’t have to speak through an earpiece all day.” 

12:06 a.m. Nancy Pelosi is reelected speaker. “I need more time perfecting democracy,” she says. “It was my ice cream melting, not my stocks! But both will be solid under the newest New Deal that our once-and-future president began during the five minutes I was away.”         

12:07 a.m. Obama promises to complete his long-stated mission of “fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” Speaking to the half-filled chamber, he says: “I will bring America together again.” Then he dons a blue baseball cap embroidered with the slogan in white letters: “BATA: Bring America Together Again.” The House rocks.

12:08 a.m. Obama meets his wife Michelle’s steady gaze, saying, “I don’t have permission to name her publicly yet, but expect the next vice president—subject to the approval of a majority of both the House and the Senate, of course—to be a spirited double-X African American icon who can be my intimate understudy and succeed me without missing a BATA beat.”  

He adds, “And Kamala could be great running the U.N. in New York, where Nelson Rockefeller had a bunch of old houses.” 

12:10 a.m. Michelle Obama fist-pumps her heart and says she has never been prouder of her country. “The first job of BATA is restoring civility and inclusivity,” she announces. The chamber rocks some more as the Obamas depart for BATA rallies in Texas and Florida.  

Obama leaves on the speaker’s podium a list of talking points titled, “BATA BOOM.” Here they are: 

  • Everyone please apologize to everyone else for insensitive word choices that inadvertently hurt feelings during and since the 2016 election. 
  • Everyone please express regret for acts of censorship or personal cancellation you inadvertently extorted, demanded, or applauded since 2020. Stop doing these things immediately or as soon as reasonably possible. 
  • President Obama will pardon almost everyone for almost everything, except spreading misinformation on subjects that John Brennan may identify from time to time. Pardons will include relatives of former presidents who left private email servers, diaries and/or laptops lying around for Russians to fabricate. 
  • President Obama will reach far across the aisle to do the people’s business with humility and mutual respect. Today, for example, Senators Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Mitt Romney are flying to Houston with the president and first lady to explore what some Republican senator might need to confirm the next vice president. 
  • No, we’re not joking! Honest!

A whole ’nother donkey could be just minutes away. The mechanics would be as cringeworthy as a Putin-Medvedev round-robin, but it would be a slam dunk legally. Remember, the Constitution only limits a president’s eligibility for election. The 25th Amendment names the speaker of the House as successor to a vacant presidency when no vice president is in line. And, as others havepointed out before, neither the Constitution nor any House rule requires the speaker to be an elected member. The Supreme Court would approve as the donkeys bray, the elephants charge . . . and the ghosts of the founders weep. 


X22, On the Fringe, and more-April 15

 



Hope you all had a nice Good Friday. Here's tonight's news:


Dem Strategists Warn Of ‘Biblical Disaster’ At Midterms…

Dem Strategists Warn Of 'Biblical Disaster' At Midterms After Doing 'F**king Horrible Job'

Zero Hedge

Between the botched Afghanistan withdrawal, hobbling domestic energy production, rampant inflation following a tsunami of stimmies, politicized pandemic 'science,' and dismal approval ratings that reflect the entire quagmire, left-wing strategists are predicting doom for Democrats come midterms. 

As of Tuesday, Biden's approval rating was dragging along at 40.6%, according to RealClear Politics.

"I think this is going to be a biblical disaster," one Democratic staffer told The Hill on condition of anonymity. "This is the reality we are in as Democrats and no one wants to face it."

Democrats know the bitter taste of bad midterm results. The party fared dismally during the first midterm elections of President Clinton and President Obama. In 1994, with Clinton in the White House, Democrats lost a net 54 House seats. In 2010, under Obama, they lost 63 seats.

An increasingly gerrymandered Congress makes that kind of wipeout hard to see this year. 

But around Washington, virtually no one expects Democrats to retain their slim House majority. One useful point of comparison is 1982, when inflation was rampant as it is now and Republicans lost a net 26 House seats with President Reagan in the White House. -The Hill

Another issue plaguing Democrats is a flood of immigrants crossing the southern US border - with as many as 18,000 per day anticipated by the Department of Homeland Security after the Biden administration abandons the use of Title 42 in late May - a Trump-era measure which was used to deny entry to migrants during the pandemic.

Meanwhile, Biden's aggressive stance against the Russian invasion of Ukraine hasn't translated to a significant polling boost - suggesting Americans aren't looking forward to a long war of attrition.

"We are in a very chaotic moment right now," said Democratic strategist Joel Payne. "There’s COVID, Afghanistan was just last year, now there’s the war in Ukraine, and the economy is up or down depending on who you are. There is this general instability that sunk Donald Trump a mere 18 or 20 months ago, and it is now Joe Biden’s problem, Joe Biden’s challenge."

Inside the DNC, Democrats are blaming 'bad messaging' for their abysmal polling.

"Look, I’m not going to BS. We’ve done a f—ing horrible job and sometimes I think we deserve to lose big in November," said another anonymous Democratic strategist to The Hill. "Democrats can say whatever they want but it’s not honest."

"The narrative here doesn’t exist," they added. "We need to wake up fast."

Strategists aren’t the only ones giving Democrats poor marks. Earlier this month, Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, said Democrats need to do a better job touting their achievements.  

“I’m not quite sure what the disconnect is between the accomplishments of the administration, and this Congress, and the understanding of what’s been done, and the impact it will have on the American public, and some of the polling and the ongoing hand-wringing,” Clinton said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”   

She said the party has “a good case to make if we get our focus in the right place to do it,” arguing Democrats have “a lot of good accomplishments to be putting up on the board. And the Democrats in office and out need to be doing a better job of making the case.” -The Hill

Former President Barack Obama also criticized his party for bad messaging.

"We got a story to tell, just got to tell it," he said - as if it will solve the slow-motion train-wreck we're witnessing.

It's all about inflation

According to former Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chair Steve Israel, "The problem is that voters would rather feel that the economy is improving than read about it. And in this hyperpartisan environment even if the statistics tell you you’re doing better, you’re not going to give Joe Biden credit for that. Which means Democrats have a message marathon, not a sprint. They’ll be forcing votes on core economic issues that force a contrast and that contrast will be drawn in potent thirty second ads in the midterm election this fall."

Former Obama White House aide and Democratic strategist Ben LaBolt suggested that with the pandemic and supply chain woes causing a surge in prices, "it’s a challenging time for leaders around the world."

"Their approval ratings have been impacted," he added.

Not all strategists agree on 'messaging' right now.

Former Harry Reid (D-NV) strategist Rodell Mollineau said Democratic consultants are "tone deaf" to suggest boasting about accomplishments during a crisis.

Instead, he says Dems need to "start rallying around the president because if his numbers are soft, then that’s going to affect the midterms as well," adding "And for once, row in the same direction."


White House restarting federal oil, gas lease sales next week

White House restarting federal oil, gas lease sales next week

A flare burns excess natural gas at an oil well on Aug. 26, 2021, in Watford City, N.D.
The Biden administration plans on returning the sale of gas leases on federal land. AP Photo/Matthew Brown, File

The Biden administration quietly announced Friday that it was restarting the sale of oil and gas leases on federal land next week — almost exactly 15 months after President Biden imposed a moratorium on such sales upon taking office. 

The Interior Department announced that its Bureau of Land Management would make approximately 144,000 acres of federal land available for lease beginning Monday — an 80% reduction in the acreage of land that had originally been considered for oil and gas exploration. 

The Department also announced that energy companies will have to pay the government royalties amounting to 18.75% of the value of what they extract from their lease, up from 12.5%. 

Biden imposed a moratorium on the sale of new leases one week after his inauguration, but the order was later blocked by a Louisiana federal judge who granted a preliminary injunction to 13 states that claimed they would suffer “irreparable injury” by the White House move. 

US District Judge Terry Doughty ruled that only Congress has the power to pause offshore oil and gas leases and ordered that plans be resumed for delayed lease sales for the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska.

This is a developing story


The Other Fednapping Plot

The same FBI operation that ginned up the phony kidnapping plot in Michigan also tried to coax a Virginia man to participate in a similar scheme against Governor Ralph Northam.


In the spring of 2020, President Donald Trump posted three tweets in a row aimed at Democratic governors continuing to impose draconian lockdowns amid the COVID-19 pandemic. “LIBERATE MINNESOTA!” Trump tweeted on the morning of April 17, 2020. A few moments later, he tweeted “LIBERATE MICHIGAN!” and “LIBERATE VIRGINIA!”

His tweets coincided with anti-lockdown rallies in several states, including a blockade around the Michigan Capitol building in Lansing a few days prior. As usual, the media expressed shock and horror at the innocuous tweets, insisting the president was encouraging violence against his political rivals. 

“One shudders to contemplate what sorts of actions right-wing protesters might take if they interpret Trump’s call for them to ‘LIBERATE’ their states seriously,” perpetual drama queen Aaron Rupar wrote at Vox. Over at the Washington Post, Mary McCord, a former top official for Obama’s Justice Department who now serves as a legal advisor to the January 6 Select Committee, claimed Trump advocated “the overthrow of democracy” and “incited insurrection” with his tweets—a stunningly prescient observation considering how the events of January 6 would later be described.

“The president is fomenting domestic rebellion and spreading lies,” Washington Governor Jay Inslee tweeted on April 17, also foreshadowing terms subsequently applied to the Capitol protest.

Less than six months later, Trump’s critics appeared vindicated when law enforcement authorities arrested several men for conspiring to kidnap and possibly kill Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer ahead of the 2020 presidential election, a plan now exposed as a case of FBI entrapment. A Michigan jury acquitted two defendants last week and could not reach a verdict on two other defendants in what the government considered one of the largest domestic terrorism investigations ever. (The Justice Department just announced it will retry Adam Fox and Barry Croft, Jr., who remain in jail.)

Defense attorneys successfully argued that multiple FBI agents and informants attempted to induce the men to commit the crimes and blasted the government in closing arguments. 

“That’s unacceptable in America,” Fox’s attorney, Christopher Gibbons, told the jury on April 1. “That’s not how it works. They don’t make terrorists so we can arrest them.”

But the government not only attempted to manufacture “terrorists” in the Whitmer kidnapping hoax—the same FBI operation also tried to coax a man in Virginia to participate in the same sort of plot against Virginia Governor Ralph Northam. That scheme didn’t fully materialize, but the FBI’s attempt to pull off a similar stunt in Virginia reveals just how far agents were willing to go to bolster FBI Director Christopher Wray’s false warning that domestic extremists planned to “kill and assassinate” public officials.

In summer 2020, Dan Chappel, the main informant in the Whitmer fednapping who was compensated at least $60,000 by the FBI for his services, targeted a man named Frank Butler, a disabled veteran in his late 60s and an alleged militia member. Taking instructions from Jayson Chambers, one of his FBI handling agents, Chappel used the same playbook in Virginia.

“Dan suggests to Frank that he engage in acts of domestic terror,” defense attorneys wrote in a joint motion filed last year in the Whitmer case. “Like the defendants in this case, Dan suggested to Frank that he attack the governor of Virginia.”

Screenshots submitted into evidence show a jaw dropping exchange between Chappel and Chambers in August 2020. “Goin [sic] to call frank butler today,” Chappel texted Chambers, asking for direction on what he should say to his target.

“Mission is to kill the governor specifically,” Chambers replied.

Just as in the Whitmer plot, Chappel lured Frank Butler into attempting to build an explosive device. Another text exchange in September 2020 shows Chappel and Chambers discussing a “recipe” for a bomb that Chappel can provide to Butler. After passing along the information to Butler, Chappel texted Chambers to tell him Frank planned on purchasing bomb-making supplies. “Awesome. Excellent work,” Chambers told Chappel.

Chappel also invited Butler to a field training exercise in Wisconsin during the last weekend in October, an excursion attended by some defendants in the Whitmer caper. 

“This event, like all the others,” defense attorneys wrote, “was conceived, planned, and conducted by the federal investigative team of agents and undercover informants working together to provide a stage upon which to manipulate their targets into acting out ostensibly incriminating behavior the government hoped to elicit in its bid to develop and then ‘interrupt’ the operation of a ‘domestic terrorist organization.’”

Butler, who cannot drive due to disabilities, did not participate. And to date, he has not been charged with any crime.

Northam, like Whitmer, made the most of the imaginary threat against him. Also like Whitmer, Northam repeatedly blamed Trump for the FBI-concocted plot, adding to nonstop news coverage as Americans were already voting for president. 

“Words matter,” Northam said during an October 14, 2020 interview on CNN, echoing the talking points being used by Joe Biden on the campaign stump at the time. “People take their marching orders from people like the president and it needs to stop.” Northam accused Trump of emboldening “white supremacists” and fueling “hatred and bigotry.”

Northam’s spokeswoman also got in on the act. “The President regularly encourages violence against those who disagree with him,” Alena Yarmosky said in a statement to reporters. “The rhetoric coming out of this White House has serious and potentially deadly consequences.”

But she also told reporters that Northam’s security team had been briefed “throughout the course of the investigation” by the FBI. Whitmer clearly knew about the plot because the FBI testified during the trial that investigators installed surveillance cameras around her vacation cottage, the potential scene of the fake crime.

So, now that the kidnapping plots have been exposed as an elaborate case of FBI entrapment, the public deserves to know how the governors were “briefed” on the sting operation. In an earlier column, I named a few government officials who need to account for their knowledge and/or participation in the scheme.

Ralph Northam should be on that list.


Homeschooling surge continues despite schools reopening

Homeschooling surge continues despite schools reopening


The coronavirus pandemic ushered in what may be the most rapid rise in homeschooling the U.S. has ever seen

April 14, 2022, 8:37 AM


BUFFALO, N.Y. -- The coronavirus pandemic ushered in what may be the most rapid rise in homeschooling the U.S. has ever seen. Two years later, even after schools reopened and vaccines became widely available, many parents have chosen to continue directing their children’s educations themselves.

Homeschooling numbers this year dipped from last year's all-time high, but are still significantly above pre-pandemic levels, according to data obtained and analyzed by The Associated Press.

Families that may have turned to homeschooling as an alternative to hastily assembled remote learning plans have stuck with it — reasons include health concerns, disagreement with school policies and a desire to keep what has worked for their children.

In 18 states that shared data through the current school year, the number of homeschooling students increased by 63% in the 2020-2021 school year, then fell by only 17% in the 2021-2022 school year.

Around 3% of U.S. students were homeschooled before the pandemic-induced surge, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. The rising numbers have cut into public school enrollment in ways that affect future funding and renewed debates over how closely homeschooling should be regulated. What remains unknown is whether this year’s small decrease signals a step toward pre-pandemic levels — or a sign that homeschooling is becoming more mainstream.

Linda McCarthy, a suburban Buffalo mother of two, says her children are never going back to traditional school.

Unimpressed with the lessons offered remotely when schools abruptly closed their doors in spring 2020, she began homeschooling her then fifth- and seventh-grade children that fall. McCarthy, who had been working as a teacher's aide, said she knew she could do better herself. She said her children have thrived with lessons tailored to their interests, learning styles and schedules.

“There’s no more homework 'til the wee hours of the morning, no more tears because we couldn’t get things done,” McCarthy said.

Once a relatively rare practice chosen most often for reasons related to instruction on religion, homeschooling grew rapidly in popularity following the turn of the century before leveled off at around 3.3%, or about 2 million students, in the years before the pandemic, according to the Census. Surveys have indicated factors including dissatisfaction with neighborhood schools, concerns about school environment and the appeal of customizing an education.

In the absence of federal guidelines, there is little uniformity in reporting requirements. Some states, including Connecticut and Nevada, require little or no information from parents, while New York, Massachusetts and some others require parents to submit instruction plans and comply with assessment rules.

The new surge in homeschooling numbers has led state legislatures around the country to consider measures either to ease regulations on homeschool families or impose new ones — debates have gone on for years. Proponents of more oversight point to the potential for undetected cases of child abuse and neglect while others argue for less in the name of parental rights.

All of the 28 state education departments that provided homeschooling data to the AP reported that homeschooling spiked in 2020-21, when fears of infection kept many school buildings closed. Of the 18 states whose enrollment data included the current school year, all but one state said homeschooling declined from the previous year but remained well above pre-pandemic levels. (The exception, South Dakota, recently changed the way it collects data).

Minnesota, for example, reported that 27,801 students are being homeschooled now, compared to 30,955 during the last school year. Before the pandemic, homeschool figures were around 20,000 or less.

Black families make up many of the homeschool converts. The proportion of Black families homeschooling their children increased by five times, from 3.3% to 16.1%, from spring 2020 to the fall, while the proportion about doubled across other groups, according to U.S. Census surveys.

Raleigh, North Carolina, mother Laine Bradley said the school system's shortcomings became more evident to families like hers when remote learning began.

“I think a lot of Black families realized that when we had to go to remote learning, they realized exactly what was being taught. And a lot of that doesn’t involve us,” said Bradley, who decided to homeschool her 7-, 10- and 11-year-old children. “My kids have a lot of questions about different things. I’m like, 'Didn't you learn that in school?' They're like, ‘No.’”

Bradley, who works in financial services, converted her dining room into a classroom and rearranged her work schedule to take over her children's education, adding lessons on financial literacy, Black history and Caribbean history important to her heritage.

“I can incorporate things that I feel like they should know,” she said. Her husband, Vince, who retired from the Air Force last year, steps in at times. The couple also have a 14-month-old. They plan to continue homeschooling for as long as their children want it. Her social media posts about her experience have drawn so much interest that Bradley recently created an online community called Black Moms Do Homeschool to share resources and experiences.

Boston University researcher Andrew Bacher-Hicks said data showed that while homeschool rates rose across the board during the last school year, the increase was greater in school districts that reverted to in-person learning, perhaps before some parents were ready to send their children back.

He said the same health concerns that drove those increases are likely behind the continued elevated rates, despite additional upheaval in schools as parents and policy-makers debate issues surrounding race and gender and which books should be in libraries.

“It’s really hard to disentangle those two things because all of this is kind of happening at the same time,” he said. “But my my guess would be that a large part of the decisions to exit from the system do have to do with COVID-related issues as opposed to political issues, because those things come up frequently and we’ve never seen an increase in homeschooling rates like this before.”

He said parents also may be concerned about the quality of education delivered by schools that have had to rely heavily on substitute teachers amid pandemic-caused staffing shortages.

McCarthy, the mom from suburban Buffalo, said it was a combination of everything, with the pandemic compounding the misgivings she had already held about the public school system, including her philosophical differences over the need for vaccine and mask mandates and academic priorities.

The pandemic, she said, “was kind of — they say the straw that broke the camel’s back — but the camel’s back was probably already broken.”

“There are kids that don’t know basic English structure but they want to push other things on children, and it can be blatant but it can be, and mostly is, very subtle, very, very subtle,” McCarthy said. “So we were ready to pull them and will never send them back to traditional school. It’s just not a fit for us.”

“It's just a whole new world that is a much better world for us,” she said.


In His Own Words, Elon Musk Explains Why He Tendered an Offer to Purchase Twitter (Video)


Appearing on Stage in Vancouver yesterday with the head of TED Chris Anderson, Elon Musk discusses why he has made a financial bid to purchase the social media platform Twitter.  The video is prompted to 11:40 when Musk takes the stage, the first part of the conversation surrounds the Twitter announcement that had made global headlines only a few hours earlier.  WATCH:






China to Hollywood: Don’t Say Gay! Hollywood: Yes Sir!

China to Hollywood: 

Don't Say Gay! 

Hollywood: Yes Sir!

China to Hollywood: Don't Say Gay! Hollywood: Yes Sir!

We already knew that Hollywood and corporate America are filled with total frauds on issues related to "human dignity" and "social justice," but here's your latest example. Before I get to that punchline, recall that the entertainment industry made a big show of opposing Florida's (popular) new parental rights law (which I've addressed several times). Boycotts were threatened, Disney blessed an employee "walkout" while weighing in heavily, and other forms of public pressure were applied. At the Oscars, the three emcees "said gay" onstage – the Florida bill in no way bars the saying of gay, but such details are beside the point – to loud audience cheers. This was before The Slap, of course. Stunning and brave: 

Hollywood stands firmly behind the LGBTQ community, you see. Queer erasure will not stand. We say gay!*

*Exceptions apply

References to a gay relationship in “Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore” were edited out of the movie by Warner Bros. for the film’s release in China. Only six seconds of the movie’s 142-minute runtime were removed. Dialogue that was edited out alluded to the romantic past between male characters Dumbledore (Jude Law) and Grindelwald (Mads Mikkelsen). “Harry Potter” author J.K. Rowling revealed Dumbledore was gay in 2009, but the movies had never explicitly referenced the character’s sexuality until this third “Fantastic Beasts” entry. Warner Bros. accepted China’s request to remove six seconds from the movie. The dialogue lines “because I was in love with you” and “the summer Gellert and I fell in love” were cut from “The Secrets of Dumbledore” release. The rest of the film remained intact...

“As a studio, we’re committed to safeguarding the integrity of every film we release, and that extends to circumstances that necessitate making nuanced cuts in order to respond sensitively to a variety of in-market factors,” Warner Bros. said in a statement to Variety. “Our hope is to release our features worldwide as released by their creators but historically we have faced small edits made in local markets.” “In the case of ‘Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore,’ a six-second cut was requested and Warner Bros. accepted those changes to comply with local requirements but the spirit of the film remains intact,” the statement added. “We want audiences everywhere in the world to see and enjoy this film, and it’s important to us that Chinese audiences have the opportunity to experience it as well, even with these minor edits.”

What a statement. "Nuanced" and "minor" edits were "necessitated" by "local requirements." But don't worry: "The spirit" of the film, with the LGBT references carefully excised, remains in place. And mission accomplished: The film debuted in China before it was released in the United States (meaning that the "don't say gay" version appeared on silver screens over there before Americans could see the uncensored original), it won the Chinese box office in its opening weekend, and the studio raked in millions – despite the minor complication of 25 million people in Shanghai being forbidden from leaving their homes, by government decree. Those people might be slowly starving, but other regions carried the Warner Brother release to a multi-million-dollar victory. Nice "win" for Hollywood. Audiences in Xinjiang providence, ground zero of the ongoing CCP genocide, were unavailable for comment. 

The Chinese Communist Party demands gay characters be literally erased from movies before they're shown to domestic audiences. Hollywood, which preens and postures on these issues back home, eagerly salutes – as it does on various censorship orders from Beijing. Will Disney encourage its Chinese employees to walk out of work in protest of this? At least the ones who haven't been forcibly locked into their apartments for weeks? Will we get a statement from the CEO lamenting another industry heavyweight bowing to systemic homophobia? Absolutely not. This is a company, after all, that thanked the CCP for the privilege of shooting a film near concentration camps holding millions of ethnic and religious minorities. They censored other content to whitewash China's human rights abuses. So they'll say gay all day, so long as it's within the context of appeasing woke activists and domestic employees eager to attack the Republican governor of Florida. They'll sit down and shut up the nanosecond Chairman Xi tells them to. While we're on the subject of sniveling hypocrisy, will any major Western corporate sponsors have anything to say about the upcoming FIFA World Cup? 

Adidas, for example, made a big show of running a trans athlete ad during March Madness. Are they comfortable sponsoring the upcoming overt bigotry at the World Cup, based on their own alleged "values"? Or does their "commitment" to the cause stop the moment their bottom line is potentially threatened? We all know the answer. After all, we just saw the same farce play out with Woke Corporations' bankrolling of Beijing's Genocide Games. Believe whatever you'd like about the Florida law. But performative opponents who say nothing in the face of bona fide oppression and bigotry when it suits their financial interests should be ignored, if not aggressively called out. Silence is violence – is it not, activists? I'll leave you with my radio monologue on all of this: 


Secret Service Agent Upset With Dog-gone Lies From the Biden Team


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

The Biden Administration seems to be setting a new standard for blatant lies.

We saw how White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki lied about Kamala Harris wearing a mask inside and socially distancing from Joe Biden, despite video showing that wasn’t the case.

When they make such easily debunked lies, how much more are they lying about the things that are important and that are not as easy to see?

They are even lying about dog bites. Imagine when they go to that level to even cover that up.

You may recall the stories in March of 2021 of Major Biden, the Biden’s dog, supposedly nipping someone. Now, according to records obtained by Judicial Watch, we find out there was a lot more to the story.

Here was Psaki downplaying it then, noting just one incident where someone “surprised” the dog (translate: even for the dog, in the Biden family it’s never their fault).

But it turns out, the White House wasn’t being transparent. As we reported in August of last year, it wasn’t just one nip, Major bit members of the Secret Service eight days in a row in early March — though only the one incident was publicly acknowledged. The agent who was bit in the incident that Psaki referred to was furious about how she downplayed the problem.

The March 8 bite actually was the final attack in an eight-day streak and the injured agent — whose injuries were categorized as “severe” by a colleague — fumed about Psaki’s spin.

“NO I didn’t surprise the dog doing my job by being at [redacted] as the press secretary just said! Now I’m pissed,” the agent wrote to a co-worker.

The colleague replied, “SMH. .. hope you didn’t get hurt to [sic] bad.”

Another message written by an unknown Secret Service employee refers to photos of the bite area and said the “injury cannot be described in any other term than ‘severe.’”

The incident occurred at about 7 a.m. March 8 as the agent was in the second-floor White House residential area with first lady Jill Biden.

“Without warning or provocation, Major barked loudly at [the agent] … and charged” is how a newly released, heavily redacted incident report describes what happened.

“Having no time to seek cover from the attack, [the agent] turned away from the dog as he bit into [redacted] right leg,” the account added.

The agent was also bitten a second time by Major, according to the records.

The records also show another incident in May, when the dog charged another agent.

A Secret Service agent wrote in an email that on May 12, “Out of nowhere the dog jumps and bites the sleeve of my suit jacket missing my arm (front teeth just scratching the top of the skin). As I lift my arm up the dog was still attached to my suit jacket and the First Lady was attempting to pull the dog off of me via the leash.”

There were also two biting incidents in February as well.

The records show that when the agent in the incident Psaki referenced put in for reimbursement for his coat that was ripped by the dog, he was chastised for putting in too much detail about the attack and told to cut out the details if he wanted to have his request processed.

“As Major came around the corner, he attacked me unprovoked, tearing the wool overcoat I was wearing that evening,” the agent wrote in a first-hand account two months later as he sought reimbursement. “This attack occurred through no fault of my own and I could not avoid this unusual circumstance due to the nature and requirements of my position.”

An unidentified Secret Service employee reprimanded the agent, writing, “Please submit with the language that has been approved by [the legal office]. Unless you dispute anything in the verbiage that was presented to you, there shouldn’t be a need to embellish with additional details that aren’t required for approval.”

“If you would like to submit a separate memo to- memorializing the events of 3/6 in great
detail, you certainly may. But your added language on the [form] provides more specificity that what [the legal office] requested. I have been told that if you update the [request] with the approved verbiage, your request will be processed.”

Ultimately, the agent took back the request for reimbursement, saying he didn’t want the government to reimburse him since that would come out of the pocket of the taxpayers — that he wanted the owners of the dogs [the Biden family] to be responsible for it.

“After some deep thought and reflection, I don’t believe the USSS should be responsible for the damage to my coat as the cause was not under their control. To be compensated in this manner would essentially have the cost borne by the tax payer and this would be unjust,” the agent wrote, adding: “the responsibility should lie with the party responsible for the wrong doing (i.e. tort), and that of course would be the dog owner/s.”

It’s not clear what happened after that.

But the incident shows that the Biden team was far more concerned with downplaying the incident than they were about the safety of the agents who were being put at risk by the dog — that they didn’t want the details to get out and blow up the problem even more. Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said the White House was still holding back information, and they haven’t responded yet to these new revelations.

This is the way they treat the people to whom they owe so much for providing them protection? That says so much about Joe Biden.



Good Friday and Passover: Remembering Freedom

Good Friday and Passover: 

Remembering Freedom

(AP Photo/Fernando Llano)

This weekend is the holiest weekend of the year for Christians and Jews alike all over the world.

For Christians, it’s the weekend we commemorate the crucifixion and celebrate the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of God. Jewish people celebrate the beginning of the seven-day festival of Passover, remembering how God freed the Hebrews from the bondage of slavery in Egypt.

Both days are pivotal moments in the Bible, and I’ve always been fascinated by the way God ties both testaments together to tell one big story about redemption and freedom.

A few years ago, I wrote a Communion meditation for an event where a group of friends worshiped and celebrated the Lord’s Supper together. I’d like to share it here because I think it ties together the remembrance of freedom from bondage that both Passover and Good Friday represent.

The Hebrews had had enough of the yoke of slavery. Gone were the days of Joseph and the special relationship the Hebrews had with the royal leadership of Egypt, and in its place was the relationship of slaves to their master. The Lord had raised up a deliverer for His people — one of their own, yet raised in the finery of the palace along the Nile.

But Pharaoh didn’t listen — in fact, God hardened his heart. Every request and each demand came along with a disgusting plague that shook Egypt to its core, but time and again, Pharaoh said no. It turns out God was setting the stage for the most dramatic plague of all.

Through Moses, the Lord told His people (in Exodus 11): “About midnight I will go out in the midst of Egypt, and every firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh who sits on his throne, even to the firstborn of the slave girl who is behind the handmill, and all the firstborn of the cattle. There shall be a great cry throughout all the land of Egypt, such as there has never been, nor ever will be again. But not a dog shall growl against any of the people of Israel, either man or beast, that you may know that the Lord makes a distinction between Egypt and Israel.”

There would be a signal: the Hebrews were to sacrifice an unblemished lamb and paint its blood upon the doorframes of the house — then they were to prepare to be on the move! God passed over Egypt and destroyed the firstborn of man and beast, but He saved the Hebrews because they had obeyed Him. Every firstborn in a family that had painted the blood on the doorframes survived. This event was to become a festival the Jewish people would remember every year forever — the Passover.

Jesus and His disciples celebrated the Passover meal. In that upper room, they followed the age-old traditions of the Passover Seder. But as Jesus led His inner circle through the Seder — after having demonstrated true servanthood by washing their feet — He added a whole new dimension to the redeeming story of the Passover.

From Matthew 26: “Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said, ‘Take, eat; this is my body.’ And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying, ‘Drink of it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. I tell you I will not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.’

Hours later, Jesus would hang on a cross, dying the gruesome death of a criminal. Days later, he would emerge from the tomb triumphant over death. Jesus would become the true Passover Lamb, dying once and for all to sin for those who would call on His name. 

This weekend, billions of Christians and Jews the world over will remember the day that God rescued His people from physical bondage as well as the day when God sent His Son to rescue all of those who call upon His name from the spiritual bondage of sin. Some Christians will celebrate next weekend instead, but no matter the day, the sentiment is the same.

For those of you who are celebrating this weekend (or next), may your weekend be filled with gratitude for the freedom that God grants to His people.