Are The Vaccines Future Generational Birth Control?

 A couple weeks ago Project Veritas made blaring headlines that they had obtain military documents showing that DARPA was presented with a proposal asking for funding to go into bat caves and spray bats to keep bats from spreading the dangerous Sars strains. Outside of the "we got them now" quotes seen on many blogs, that, and James O'Keefe seen in a video standing in a courtroom hallway declaring he was a happy healthy person who didn't want to kill himself right before going off to testify how he came about the paperwork, that's about the extent that most people paid any attention to the release.

Anyone taking deep dives into all the information that's out there would have stopped to ask themselves how this plays into other information that has been put out. In this instance it runs counter to materials put forth by Dr. David Martin via patented records presented to German investigators/scientist/doctors preparing a case to go before the world court. According to Dr. Martin Sars Cov 2 is a computer sequenced generated virus.

Coronavirus is malleable and can be synthetically modified in the laboratory using gene sequencing technologies to turn computer code into a pathogen (initially funded as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine) [10:30] 

Furthermore according to Dr Martin corona virus was harmless to humans prior to scientist experimenting with it.  That would lead to one asking if it was harmless than why were they in bat caves spraying bats. My personal opinion is at this point chances were that they weren't, bats just became the scape goat. When you think of over the eight hundred claimed trips into bat caves all over the world looking for this particular virus that to this day scientist said cannot be found that leads to even more credence that the whole spraying of bats in a bat cave probably never happened. If you were of curious mind than you'd ask yourself if they are claiming they were in bat caves than exactly what are they claiming they were doing in them.

Well evidently they were trying to vaccinate the bats against corona virus. I guess that's a good endeavor all in itself but unless they had an endless trial of money to keep going into bat caves into infinity to vaccinate bats what good does it do if future generations of bats don't get vaccinated, or what if they miss a few bats. Herein lies the crux of the situation. If you read the paperwork the attempted vaccination was to modify the gene in the bats so the offspring of bats couldn't or wouldn't produce the deadly pathogen.  According to Dr Martin there was never a deadly pathogen to begin with. So inquiring minds would want to know exactly what is up with all this. It doesn't make any logical sense that supposedly they'd be making request to spend millions of dollars to go into bat caves to altar the gene of bats who don't harbor a dangerous pathogen. Exactly what are bats being used as a potential scape goat for.

That brings your mind back to reading the Japanese study where they found the spike protein in all organs of the body, with a particular high amount in the ovaries. I am not saying there is any real correlation here, I am not a scientist, but it did make me think about past attempts used by the globalist Bill Gates that immunization led to some woman ending up sterile, unable to have kids. I am not saying that was intentional either, from what I can remember they ended up being sued over it and if I remember correctly they were found guilty. If you look at that failure then going back to the chalk board would ensue in any quest to obtain universal vaccine birth control. Think about the possibility they could have realized this would have to be a second generation attempt, that somehow they'd have to figure out a way to alter the next generations genes. By the time these kids grew up these guys will long be gone from the earth but universal population control would have been met.

Seriously there's no other logical explanation as to why they'd be exploring scientifically how to altar the genome of future generations if there wasn't a serious pathogen threat from bats to begin with then obviously they were after something else and bats just ended up being the scape goat or their deflection away from the truth. This would also explain why they'd be so sick as to want to give an experimental vaccine to children, and now even tiny babies. To give infants an experimental vaccines is about as sick and demented as it can get. To do something as sinister as this is you really don't think these people wouldn't kill you? That brings me to touch on the next topic of conversation.

I admit I've only seen before this current release one other video of Senator Ron Johnson. This current release though, in my opinion, depicts him as a clown.  Excuse me if you want but some people just get lost in the moment. I think we are all there at times because we are so sick and tired of it, the deception, deceit, dishonesty, lies being told and we truly want to believe there are the hero's out there somewhere going to come rushing in on their white horses to save us. When I watch this man disrupt the doctor in the video about to spill the beans on the vaccines and exactly how in scientific terms they can create cancer only to have clown face disrupt him at that exact moment that tells me something, that and his clown face expressions. As soon as the Jewish hat doctor says "be cancer caus... Ron Johnson disrupts him at that exact moment with:

Your certainly telling us you are qualified but I don't know what your talking about.

Well the lady doctor sitting next him wasn't having any of it and interjects to explain exactly what it is he don't understand.

I want to clarify, people have said mRNA vaccines, mRNA only goes to protein and we can't do anything. First we know people have reverse transcriptase (I think that's the word she used), yes it can make DNA, yes it can go back into the DNA but there's some thing else about RNA, RNA can make little hairpin loops, RNA can regulate your DNA so when you put an mRNA or RNA into your body it can get in and it can be alternatively sliced bind to your DNA and it can regulate it for positive or negative. It can change your gene expression and there's stuff in there that can do that intentionally or unintentionally and we don't know, it's completely unethical because we are just beginning to understand mRNA silencing where these RNA molecules regulate our DNA, it's completely unethical to use this technology.

Then Dr Peter McCullough goes on to state the fact that more studies need to be done. Which brings me back to Dr. Ryan Coles pleas that they need funding to be able to find out why cancers are on the rise among the vaccinated, he stated that they know the spike protein can bind to these receptors and can activate them, they can bind to cancer promoting sites, in essence they can dispute what he called P53 which is the guardian of our genome. Upon which the lady doctor stated that is what they expect is going on with women who have breast cancer, the spike protein is blocking the crucial role of P53.

Honestly folks I don't know exactly what's going on here and it certainly doesn't help that at this point we have a senator who has spent months on this claiming he doesn't either. When I watch this video I see three, four of these doctors who have made claims they actually got the poison jab, so exactly whom is it that I am to believe? We have a senator with a golly gee look on his face surrounded by a room half filled with the same faces showing up on talk shows telling us all the vaccines are safe, stop severe disease sitting in a room half filled with doctors who are saving they are not. 

We had James O'Keefe who got busted by the feds all of a sudden coming up with supposed top secret but not classified military information along with a letter from someone inside the military claiming if he could so easily get the information then others could get it just as easily so he moved to have it classified. The scary part of that is is the part that no one read, if you look at what did get released, and that was some bat shit crazy stuff then ask yourself exactly what it was that was so alarming that we didn't get to see that he moved to get classified.

People need to start getting a lot more in depth in their digging instead of being distracted by clown face denials and O'Keefe characters saying the cute stuff. Because if it's true that they are working on a new vaccine technology that basically lets them interchange the spike heads something tells me we are in for a lot more surprises. More on that to come as I keep digging, remember, the truth lies behind what they are saying not up front in their deflections.

******

Links to information in the article can be found inside the op piece on my blog at:

https://hive.blog/deepdives/@sunlit7/r6s9ez

or by following the links below:

banned. video/watch?id=61f08a740388fd1a8a6afca9

assets.ctfassets.net/syq3snmxclc9/4NFC6M83ewzKLf6DvAygb4/0cf477f75646e718afb332b7ac6c3cd1/defuse-proposal_watermark_Redacted.pdf

archive. org/details/the-fauci-covid-19-dossier-by-david-e-martin-ph-d/page/n3/mode/2up

X22, Christian Patriot News, and more-Feb 4

 

Hetty withdrawal is an ugly phase, especially when there's a hiatus during winter that feels like 1 giant extended summer hiatus when its not supposed to feel like that.

But enough of my grumbling, here's tonight's news:

Truckers vs. Tyrants

The only power the tyrant has is the power we grant him if we comply.

by Drew Allen for American Greatness

As a caravan of Canadian truckers, composed of thousands and stretching 45 miles, made its way to the Canadian capital of Ottawa in protest of leftist tyranny, the propagandist media moved swiftly to downplay the size and scope of it all. A USA Today “fact checker” wrote: “Canada truck convoy not an official Guinness World record.”

The current Guinness record for the longest “truck parade” is 480 vehicles stretching across 4.6 miles. The 45-mile-long Canadian freedom caravan would easily have beaten the current Guinness record by a factor of 10 had protest organizers applied to beat the record. But setting a Guinness record was not at the top of the freedom truckers’ agenda. Instead, the brave truckers were going to Ottawa to protest against tyranny and its Canadian poster child, Justin Trudeau.

So while USA Today’s “fact check” was technically true, it was nothing more than a desperate, pedantic effort to dismiss the overwhelming size and significance of the freedom caravan. 

Other propagandists simply lied.A Washington Post writer claimed the caravan was made up of “hundreds of trucks and personal vehicles.” The same Post propagandist described the protestors as a “fringe group” and “unfortunate minority.” Prime Minister-in-hiding Justin Trudeau repeated the totalitarian talking point, condemning the protestors as a “small fringe minority.” 

Trudeau and the media know the protestors aren’t a “fringe minority.” On the contrary, these tyrants know it is they who are the fringe minority. But they also understand that what power they have is derived exclusively from a fearful and obedient patriotic majority; a majority, which accepts the tyrants’ big lie that they are a powerless and outnumbered minority.

As I said on my latest podcast, those of us standing against tyranny are like a 6-foot-2, 185-pound boxer. Before we’ve even seen our opponent, the media—acting as our tyrannical opponent’s surrogates—tell us that we’re about to get into the ring with a 6-foot-6, 250-pound monster, who is going to annihilate us. It’s a lie intended thoroughly to dispirit us by sowing doubt, insecurity, and fear in our minds in the hope that we will give up even before we get in the ring.

But if we climb into the ring and face our opponent, we find ourselves staring down at a 4-foot-11 coward, who has neither the strength nor stomach to beat us. That’s exactly what the brave Canadian truckers discovered when they climbed into the ring and the mighty Justin Trudeau fled the scene, going into Canada’s witness protection program.

The Canadian protestors have brought the Left’s “fringe minority” narrative crashing to the ground. Since the tyrants can’t ignore the movement, they are now engaged in an effort to smear both the movement and the protestors themselves. The Left is trying to “J-6” the Canadian protestors.

The same lies and mischaracterizations used to attack the MAGA movement and Trump are now being used to attack the Canadians. The Washington Post called the Canadian freedom convoy “toxic.” Trudeau has accused the protestors of representing “anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, anti-black racism, homophobia, and transphobia”—none of which is true.

Despite the peaceful nature of the Canadian protests and complete absence of violence in Ottawa, the media continues to claim the movement is “extreme” and “dangerous.” An image of one lone and likely left-wing activist provocateur carrying a crisp, newly purchased Confederate flag, for example, was justification enough for the media to denounce the entire movement as racist. Never mind the fact that the crowd of truckers surrounding the masked Confederate can be heard shaming him and telling him to leave.

The strategy of the intolerant Left, of course, is this: If you can’t prevent a movement, just smear it. The objective of this intentional mischaracterization is obvious—to distract or divert attention away from the justified and truthful objections to vaccine mandates and tyranny.

Like the Democrats in America, Trudeau and the Canadian ruling class are likely already scheming to use the protests in Ottawa as a means to punish and discourage any future protests against tyranny in Canada. 

How closely Trudeau will follow the Democratic Party’s J6 playbook is unknown, but we do know the courage of the 50,000 Canadian truckers has inspired a convoy of American truckers to follow suit. Soon, a U.S. convoy would travel from California to Washington, D.C. to protest our own tyrants and their unconstitutional mandates.

I am hopeful the end is near for our tyrannical abusers—both in the United States and Canada. I am certain, freedom and the patriotic majority will be victorious if we just step inside the ring. After all, the only power the tyrant has is the power we grant him when we comply. When our compliance ends, so too does the “power” of the ruling minority.

Boomers, Meet the Based

There’s a generation gap on the Right, and it’s hurting us.

by Glenn Ellmers & Josiah Lippincott for American Greatness

“Divide and conquer” is the guiding strategy of the woke oligarchy. The regime is trying to marginalize Red America as illegitimate, to separate us from “the mainstream,” and thus declare us undeserving of the rights and privileges of citizenship. But beyond that, the woke regime is also exploiting a generation gap on the right (which is partly but not wholly a factor of age), through double-speak and mixed messages.

Contrary to some prejudices among the younger Right, not every self-identified conservative over 50 is deluded and useless. Likewise, older conservatives need to know that not every young, right-wing provocateur on Twitter is a racist anarchist. But a lot of people on either side see each other that way, largely because the regime’s vast propaganda machine is able to reenforce both of these prejudices.

It’s hard to know whether this multi-pronged media campaign by the Left is a carefully planned psy-ops strategy, or just the net effect of simultaneously asserting contradictory arguments depending on whatever seems expedient. Either way, a generation gap on the right is being exacerbated, in part because each side is reacting to the Blue regime’s propaganda.

The older generation grew up in an America where, on the surface, institutions were trustworthy, or at the very least, not actively at war with the people. That façade crumbled for those who grew up after 9/11. Decades of pointless war in the Middle East, the financial crisis in which not a single banker on Wall Street went to jail, and the ever-skyrocketing cost of living, soured the generation that grew up under George W. Bush and Barack Obama. The promise of racial reconciliation never materialized and the constant screams of crisis (climate change! COVID!) have further radicalized a growing youth faction on the right.

Reinforcing Narratives

Young people get almost all their news online, which gives them a broad array of information sources and makes them far less likely to accept any “official” narratives. At times, they may almost be too skeptical, embracing odd and outlandish theories simply because they are outside the mainstream. Insisting that the sky is pink just because Ibram X. Kendi says it is blue is not a sign of independent thinking.

Americans over 50 tend to be less active on social media, less frequent consumers of alternative news sites, and more dependent on the legacy media of newspapers and television networks. Of course, many older conservatives know that the establishment media is heavily skewed to the left, yet the publications they turn to correct this imbalance are, let us say, rather tame and conventional. As far as the younger dissident right is concerned, most old-line “conservative” publications are part of the same corrupt media establishment.

The more staid and authoritative style of the New York Times and the network news (which the Times heavily influences) tends to reinforce the Boomers’ inclination to believe that our institutions are still functioning normally and the system is working. Our political gerontocracy contributes to this problem: nothing makes a Boomer feel young like seeing Congress run by people in their 80s.

News stories that create enormous controversy online often get much less attention in the legacy media. Thus, conservatives among the older generation may have little familiarity with the details of events and scandals that lead millennials to be alarmed and cynical. The treatment of those arrested in connection with January 6 is a good example. Right-wingers under 40 tend to know much more about the mistreatment of these prisoners, and thus tend to be more sympathetic, compared to conservatives over 50, who were alarmed and repelled by the events of January 6, and thus are usually much less concerned with or attentive to those who have been arrested.

When a clear case of left-wing excess does leak into the mainstream news—about Critical Race Theory being taught in schools, for example—the legacy media will quickly offer an authoritative source to deny or downplay the revelations. This tactic works, up to a point, for those with more limited access to alternative news sources, but it only hardens the disgust and skepticism of those who are mostly online, who quickly learn about the dishonesty and hypocrisy of such denials.

What the Boomers Need to Know about the Based

Let’s clear up a few of the most common questions or suspicions older conservatives have about the so-called dissident Right:

Do you hate America and want it to fail? 

A lot of younger right-wingers would say yes . . . in a certain sense, they do. And they have reasons for saying that. What young man with any sense wants to die for the Joe Biden regime in the Ukraine? Who wants to pay taxes so Kamala Harris can shower money on illegal immigrants and left-wing shock troops?

That’s a hard message to hear for anyone who lived through the 1960s and the Cold War. For a long time, to be on the Right—to defend liberty and morality and decency—meant to be a patriot and to love America. And it still does. But the enemies of freedom and decency who hate America are no longer godless communists abroad, they are the godless leftists at home who are currently in power.

If America means transgender rights and suffocating biomedical security measures, then those who love freedom will come to hate America—or, to be more specific, the current regime that has taken control of what used to be America.

Young people on the Right don’t hate liberty and morality and decency; they despise woke ideology. The older idea of “America” that the Boomers love is gone, as far as the younger generation is concerned. Most Boomers will never share this antipathy, but they must learn to distinguish between America the nation and America the state. The American state—as the COVID lockdowns, Russiagate hoax, and the political prosecution of the January 6 protestors show—is at war with the American people. (Many older conservatives recognized this distinction and gave Rush Limbaugh a pass when he famously remarked on air that he hoped Barack Obama would fail.)

What’s with all the vulgar humor and symbolism?

Young men full of spirit and life don’t want to be screeched at by the shamans and witches of the ruling class. The authoritative piety of our time—antiracism—reeks of the worst excesses of cultish fanaticism. The young men of the right can’t help but mock these mindless dogmatists. A schoolmarmish concern with “civility,” feelings, and “hateful rhetoric” will never convince young men to abandon a life of freedom in thought and action. Political correctness about race and ethnicity smacks of self-righteousness and hypocrisy.

Younger people were born into an America that has no racist laws, that offers racial preferences in hiring and education, and which has elevated figures from the civil rights movement to the level of secular saints. The idea that the Ku Klux Klan or the American Nazi Party are a major threat to anyone today is rightly seen as hysterical nonsense.

Today’s youth mock the shibboleths of the regime as a provocation, and they see the growth of the biomedical security state, suppressing dissent in the name of “health,” as a far more pressing threat to liberty.

What’s the weird obsession with weightlifting, aesthetics, “physiognomy,” etc.?

That the body and the mind are connected is a radical statement in a world where a man can claim to be a woman because his spirit is “actually” female. The body reveals the soul. The youth movement on the Right has turned toward self-overcoming and a love of beauty and physical improvement to spite the left-wing despisers of the body.

America’s left-wing corporations and culture want people to be fat, slow, and stupid. The youth on the Right are therefore zagging, where the Left wants them to zig. The instincts are more important than the ideas. The youth movement, at least in this regard, is Nietzschean—turning against what they regard as the Socratic word factory of “facts and logic.” In the spiritual war against ugliness and decline, they see mockery and fighting spirit as much better weapons.

Why are you so angry?

The youth movement on the Right has watched for years as their elders let the country collapse around them. Unrestricted immigration has unmoored traditional happy communities. Stagnant wages and skyrocketing home prices have made family formation economically difficult. Divorce law and feminist hectoring have undercut traditional, long-term marriages.

A generation of young men—especially young and talented white men from the middle class—find themselves denied access to the institutions of power (they’re too privileged) but are still expected to hitch themselves to the plow of economic productivity and keep the regime functioning. More and more of these young men are checking out. They don’t want to die for Joe Biden and gay rights in the Ukraine. They aren’t interested in sacrificing for a regime that hates them.

Moreover, they suspect that many older conservatives, with their comparative financial security, are too insulated from the current crisis. Boomers have “made it” and will likely not live long enough to suffer the consequences of a financial or political collapse; they have seized the lifeboats and left the young to fend for themselves.

What the Based Need to Know about the Boomers

Why are you so complacent?

Well, the older generation doesn’t see itself as complacent, of course. The young are correct to despise Clown World; but Boomers see them as petulant and self-pitying when they insist that the United States today is worse in every possible way compared to anything that has ever existed. That’s melodramatic and unhelpful.

And Boomers aren’t, in fact, complacent. Walk into any county Republican party meeting and it will be filled with high-energy members of the 65-and-up crowd eager to save their country. The problem for the young is their focus. Boomers still believe in the institutions they grew up with. Many believe that if only we pass a balanced budget amendment and term limits, or hold an Article V constitutional convention, the nation’s problems can be solved. They don’t seem to appreciate fully how the Left has dramatically transformed the country in their lifetimes.

Many of these changes have been so dramatic, even shocking, that the older generation simply cannot process what has been done to the land that they love. Mass immigration, in particular, has radically altered our national character and given the Left an enormous electoral advantage. Each year, the nation’s cities become more and more alienated from its suburbs and rural heartland. That’s not the kind of political problem that can be solved with a few pieces of legislation and imploring calls to treat each other with respect and decency.

The Boomers point out that as bad as the riots of 2020 were—and they clearly were not the “mostly peaceful protests” described by the state media—Americans who lived through the 1960s and early ’70s witnessed far more, and far more violent, radicalism than anything that has (yet) happened in contemporary America. The ’60s included widespread fires and bombings on campuses, occupations by armed radicals, gun battles erupting in courtrooms, political kidnappings, and assassinations.

As if that were not enough, the next decade was even worse in some ways, with its urban decay, crime, filth, and stagflation of the 1970s—not to mention the self-humiliation of Jimmy Carter’s foreign policy. What’s happening today is, in certain ways, not new for the Boomers. Yet, America came through all that, and even won the Cold War! (And living through the Cold War itself, especially at its height, is another experience that the Based can’t quite relate to, which makes today’s crisis seem less like an existential threat.)

So simply on the basis of their experience, older conservatives are far more likely to have a certain faith that America can turn things around, can rescue herself, yet again. That opinion may be wrong or misguided, but it’s not automatic proof of moral cowardice or bad faith.

Why did you fail so miserably to strangle the infant wokeism in its crib, and hand us this crappy society we have today?

If Boomers are going to be accused of living forever in Ronald Reagan’s 1980s, they might respond to this charge with a line from the classic ’80s movie Stripes: “Lighten up, Francis.”

More seriously, the older generation can say with much validity that they didn’t create this mess we are in. Its intellectual origins can be traced back to the importation of German political science in the late 1800s. Reagan, and even Richard Nixon, campaigned against a liberal establishment that was already well-entrenched; so the failures of the conservative resistance to stop encroaching leftism can’t be pinned entirely on George Will or anyone else alive today. Long before Reagan and William F. Buckley, Jr., waged their own (unsuccessful) battle against political correctness, conservatives like Robert Taft and Albert Jay Nock failed to overturn FDR’s New Deal. Going back even farther, Elihu Root and Henry Cabot Lodge were unable to stop the Progressive Movement. There’s plenty of blame to go around for our present predicament. What all these old fogies—living and dead—can legitimately say is that absent the resistance that was mounted, America’s decline would have happened even faster.

Of course, a failure to solve problems is one thing. And the Boomers may have a reasonable defense there. A failure to see problems, however, is less excusable. The inability or unwillingness to acknowledge how radically the country has changed, and to accept (however hard this may be) that no simple remedies or accommodation within the current system seem possible, is the source of the younger generation’s greatest impatience and frustration.

Combining Experience and Energy

Plenty of lost Boomers cling to the dream of a dying past and far too many cynical young radicals are too “black-pilled” to take useful action. But the solution isn’t intergenerational finger-pointing. What is needed is a return to a united front politics that merges Boomer resources with youthful talent and energy. And for that, the Right needs another leader like Donald Trump, or perhaps even Trump himself to return to the potent politics of national renewal that won in 2016.

This right-wing youth movement has skepticism of the regime in spades. What it needs is a way to focus this energy toward accomplishing some great end. Trump was the flash of lightning that gave a jolt of energy and life to the moribund conservative movement. Young men who were drowning in cynicism and boredom found in Trump a leader who could inspire them. The “meme war” waged on Trump’s behalf by his mischievous and youthful followers made an enormous difference in the election. Here, we see a model of the kind of alliance between the Boomers and the “based” that the Right needs as it struggles against the schoolmarm dictatorship.

The youth movement on the Right shouldn’t jettison the Boomers as out-of-touch losers. It is imperative that the members and pranksters that make up the vanguard of the new right find a way to connect their searing cultural commentary and humor to older Americans. It has been done before, especially in 2015, and it can be done again.

Our message to the young: Stay away from intergenerational blame games. Many older Americans simply didn’t understand what was happening to their country as they grew up. Their 401k’s were growing, they could still grill in peace. Life was good! That things have deteriorated so quickly in almost every way is still very difficult for this generation to process.

To the Boomers: Understand that the youthful right-wing provocateurs have a place. If you want a better country for you and your children and grandchildren, you need those who can use humor and mockery to disarm the Left. Facts and logic will not save America, but a spiritual war against the high priests of wokeness can. For that, conservatives need to do more than just throw policy papers at their enemies. If winning policy debates was enough, then Washington would not be the leftist Leviathan it is now. Older Americans should embrace or at least learn to appreciate the joys of trolling the ever-living daylights out of woke communists and liberals. These digital ju-jitsu maneuvers can effectively leverage Big Tech’s massive weight against its sanctimonious overlords and undermine their ideological pretensions. Both older and younger citizens on the Right agree on the alarming power of Silicon Valley, and the way it distorts our political life and public discourse.

The old and the young must join forces for the good of the country. Experience and energy, the Boomers and the Based, must stand together in defense of freedom and against our degenerate ruling class.

High School Senior Leads Students in Maskless Protest into School

 

Source: https://welovetrump.com/2022/02/04/watch-high-school-senior-leads-students-in-maskless-protest-into-school/

We’ve heard this expression a thousand times:

“Children are the future.”

Sometimes that thought can be a little scary, due to the fact that schools have been indoctrinating children for a long time.

If a group of students from a Washington High School have there way, the future may still be bright.

A video has gone viral from Washougal High School, in which a student led several of his classmates in a maskless protest into the school.

The student addressed his peers before entering the school, asking them to remain respectful to teachers while protesting:

“This is not an excuse for any of you freshmen and sophomores to disrespect your teachers. If I hear of anybody disrespecting teachers or staff tomorrow, that makes us look bad. We want this to be a peaceful, respectful movement; we are just trying to gain back our rights as citizens.”

He continued:

“The teachers, in the end, are just doing their jobs. It doesn’t come from them; it comes from the state.”

Follow on Telegram @WeLoveTrumpNoah

A follow up video showed students entering the school while respectfully declining to wear masks.

Our friends at the Daily Wire shared this uplifting story of bravery among our youth:

This week, a viral video was triggered when a student at Washougal High School in Washougal, Washington, spoke before students to instruct them how they would go maskless in school to protest against mask rules, saying, “What we’re hoping is that they kick us out … because they have to report that attendance to the state, and if the state sees a day where 100 or however many kids are here or absent, they’re going to start asking questions.”

“Everybody, shut up,” he started as he addressed like-minded students. “This is not an excuse for any of you freshmen and sophomores to disrespect your teachers. If I hear of anybody disrespecting teachers or staff tomorrow, that makes us look bad. We want this to be a peaceful, respectful movement; we are just trying to gain back our rights as citizens. We do not care — the teachers, in the end, are just doing their jobs. It doesn’t come from them; it comes from the state.”

“Now, what we’re hoping is that they kick us out,” he explained. “This sounds bad, but we’re hoping that they kick us out, because they have to report that attendance to the state, and if the state sees a day where 100 or however many kids are here are absent, they’re going to start asking questions. Our hope is that we can get this state-wide.”

Check out the clip:

In this follow up video, students politely refuse the teacher trying to get them to put masks on:

The students, especially the young man who led them, are now being hailed for their bravery and the respectful way they went about the protest:

Was Hillary Clinton Paying Michael Avenatti?

As the creepy porn lawyer faces fines and jail time, questions about his operation—and who was financing it—linger.

by Mark Judge for American Greatness

Did Hillary Clinton or the Democratic National Committee ever pay Michael Avenatti?

The question isn’t exactly new. It was at least hinted at as early as May 10, 2018. That day, Mark Penn, a former advisor to President Bill Clinton, published an op-ed in The Hill newspaper. At the time, the news was filled with the rantings of Avenatti, who gained his fame and notoriety representing former porn star Stormy Daniels. Daniels was claiming she was paid to cover up an affair with Donald Trump before he was elected president.

Penn’s column raised several good questions. They have become even more relevant now that Avenatti, on trial for allegedly stealing money from Daniels, is back in the news. 

Penn asked:

So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on ‘60 Minutes’ despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

Finally, Penn ended with this haymaker:

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Avenatti has been given a free, unfettered media perch on TV to spread his stuff without the networks forcing him to meet any disclosure requirements, saying that he is Daniels’s attorney when someone else entirely is paying for this operation is not true disclosure that allows the viewer to evaluate the source and potential conflicts. He is now being given deference as though he is a journalist interested in protecting unverified sources while he makes headline-grabbing pronouncements. Lawyers need to disclose the source of their evidence.

I have some personal experience with Avenatti, the man Tucker Carlson calls “the creepy porn lawyer.” In fall 2018, the political Left and the media tried to destroy Brett Kavanaugh, a high school friend of mine. Central to their effort was Michael John Avenatti. 

The creepy porn lawyer lived on television (he was interviewed 147 times in one week alone), and was fawned over by journalists who claim to possess street smarts, yet couldn’t find their way out of their own bathrooms without help. 

Fueled by opposition research, extortion threats and an attempted honey trap, politicians and the media climbed aboard the S.S. Avenatti, the direct lineal descendant of the Titanic. 

In the fall of 2018, a woman named Christine Blasey Ford accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her in 1982 when we were all in high school. Ford claimed that I was in the room when the incident allegedly happened. Ford, who had every intention of going public, was a bad actor, in both senses of the term. 

“Sloppy” doesn’t begin to describe the corporate-Left’s reporting about the claims against Kavanaugh and me. Vanity Fair had to issue a correction admitting that a woman who’d said we went to college together in fact had attended a different school. The Washington Post withheld exonerating evidence presented by a witness they excluded from their explosive first story about Ford’s allegations. Reporters used as sources people who had never so much as laid eyes on Kavanaugh or me.

Then came Avenatti. On September 24, 2018, I got a nasty message on my phone from someone saying, “You like [expletive] with people? I like [expletive] with people, too. Give me a call.” I still don’t know who the call was from, but I did give the number to the FBI. 

Words I had learned as a kid watching “The Exorcist” came back to me: “Do not talk to the demon. The demon is a liar.”

Later that same day, Avenatti went on TV where he appeared apoplectic and said my name 13 times within a span of two minutes. He was flustered. Extortion wasn’t working, as it would fail with Nike. Avenatti had figured out that I was too street smart to hand him the shiv to plant into my back. I was not about to give into the mob. 

Then the creepy porn lawyer produced a woman named Julie Swetnick. Swetnick claimed that Brett and I had attended 10 parties in high school where girls were drugged and gang raped. She claimed that she herself was the victim of a gang rape.

The story was too good to check. In a move that would have gotten an intern fired, NBC’s Kate Snow not only put Swetnick on air without any vetting, she also withheld information that would have damaged Avenatti. 

During the first week of October, when Kavanaugh still had not been confirmed, Avenatti claimed he had a woman who would corroborate Swetnick’s claims. It was a lie. 

From NBC News: 

Reached by phone independently from Avenatti on Oct. 3, the woman said she only ‘skimmed’ the declaration [Avenatti had written for her]. After reviewing the statement, she wrote in a text on Oct. 4 to NBC News: ‘It is incorrect that I saw Brett spike the punch. I didn’t see anyone spike the punch . . . I was very clear with Michael Avenatti from day one.’

There was more: “I would not ever allow anyone to be abusive in my presence. Male or female,” the woman told NBC. “I will definitely talk to you again and no longer Avenatti. I do not like that he twisted my words,” she wrote.

Rather than report this news at the time, which would have helped Judge Kavanaugh, NBC sat on the story for several weeks. From Fox News on October 26, 2018: 

NBC News is under fire for sitting on information that would have cast serious doubt on wild claims about now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh just when the unsubstantiated allegations were rocking the judge’s confirmation to the high court.

Controversial attorney Michael Avenatti and client Julie Swetnick claimed last month Kavanaugh took part in high school gang rapes just as Kavanaugh was defending himself against a separate, uncorroborated claim. Avenatti connected NBC News with an anonymous woman he claimed could corroborate Swetnick’s allegations, but instead accused the lawyer of ‘twisting’ her words. Still, NBC went with Swetnick’s story without disclosing the exculpatory reporting.

On Thursday, nearly three weeks after Kavanaugh’s confirmation, NBC News published an article headlined, ‘New questions raised about Avenatti claims regarding Kavanaugh,’ that detailed ‘inconsistencies’ with Swetnick’s claims. In the article, NBC News admitted the unidentified woman repudiated the sworn statement Avenatti provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee on her behalf to corroborate Swetnick’s claims.

Kavanaugh’s polarizing confirmation proceedings ended on Oct. 6, when the Senate voted 50-48 to confirm him to the high court.

Swetnick had once been represented by attorney Debra Katz, who also represented Christine Blasey Ford. From the CNN website on September 26, 2018: 

Two sources told CNN that Swetnick filed a sexual harassment complaint against a former employer a decade ago and was represented in the matter by a lawyer from Katz’s firm. Swetnick is currently represented by attorney Michael Avenatti, who rose to prominence earlier this year for representing Stormy Daniels. A source familiar with the matter confirmed that a lawyer at Katz’s firm did represent Swetnick, but that it was not Katz herself. The source said Katz never represented Swetnick and that the firm did not refer Swetnick to Avenatti for representation.

I guess that settles that.

The scam of 2018 was an opposition research dump made up of an unholy trinity. It was journalists working with lawyers and opposition researchers, who in turn were working with the lawyers and politicians. The whole thing was one reckless, self-perpetuating, toxic scrum. The Left cast a net over the Washington metropolitan area (it included my high school yearbook). Anything they dragged up was used against us. I was called a drunk, a racist, a misogynist—even a fan of Benny Hill.

It was the kind of thing that happens in totalitarian states. The people who set it up may go to jail or go to therapy or return to their high paying media jobs. They will also die without honor.

At his sentencing in 2021, Avenatti wept. “Your honor, I’ve learned that all the fame, notoriety and money in the world is meaningless. TV and Twitter, your honor, mean nothing,” he said. He then mentioned his three children, including two teenage daughters who wrote letters to the judge. “Every father wants their children to be proud of them. I want mine to be ashamed. Because if they are ashamed, it means their moral compass is exactly where it should be.”

That’s fine, fraud. Now who paid you?