Wednesday, September 22, 2021

The F-Word Biden’s Play for the Courts


Biden’s fascist COVID order is not a 
serious effort to stem the tide of the pandemic.


Biden’s fascist COVID order is not a serious effort to stem the tide of the pandemic.

In his remarks justifying his vaccine mandate, Joe Biden gave the most fascistic speech ever delivered by a president of the United States. It demanded unconstitutional and illegal powers and replaced the rule of law with partisanship, timed solely to distract attention from his Afghanistan fiasco. 

In overthrowing the notion of law as the embodiment of objective reason, he has made a mockery of the American concept of the rule of law. He has replaced the constitution and law with the willfulness of a king, and a raging one at that. In that regard, I wish his critics would cease calling him a dotard, as that completely distorts the seriousness of the moment. I do not make this charge of fascism lightly, but since no one else deigns to do it, here it is. 

Before going into detail, let me compare Biden’s remarks with a worthy competitor for most fascist speech: Franklin Roosevelt’s first inaugural (March 4, 1933). In it he compared the powers he needed to deal with the crisis of the Depression with those of a general in time of war. By Roosevelt’s reckoning, the American people are his privates to order about. (Recall these were the times during which we saw the rise of tyrants in Europe and Asia.) FDR compared himself with God’s anointed and Jesus Christ (having driven “the money-changers . . . from their high seats in the temple of our civilization”).

Two presidential elections later, in his 1944 State of the Union address, Roosevelt compared the victory of Republicans who opposed him (for his third and what would be his fourth terms) to Republicans of the 1920s and insisted this showed them as yielding “to the spirit of Fascism here at home.”  FDR, in other words, was assailing Calvin Coolidge as an American Hitler! “[I]f history were to repeat itself and we were to return to the so-called ‘normalcy’ of the 1920s—then it is certain that even though we shall have conquered our enemies on the battlefields abroad, we shall have yielded to the spirit of Fascism here at home.” 

The man who was an eloquent wartime president unleashed partisan vitriol at fellow Americans dying for the country in Europe and the Pacific. Thus, “the view that the New Deal was ‘fascism without the billy clubs’ was well-nigh universal among FDR’s opponents on the Left (e.g. Norman Thomas), as well as on the Right (Herbert Hoover)” as Angelo Codevilla has pointed out.   

Recall, too, that Roosevelt’s vice president in his fourth presidential campaign later that year would be Harry Truman who, when he ascended to the throne, threatened to draft striking union workers and accused his 1948 Republican opponents of being front men for fascists, racists, and anti-religious bigots. 

Truman is also responsible for the fascist seizure of steel mills on the pretext of national security, the Korean War. Although the Supreme Court, even while still bearing the stamp and the stomps of Franklin Roosevelt, slapped Truman down for this outrage, he still got three votes for his unlawful and unconstitutional action. 

The racist charge had to be cut back somewhat with the victory of Nazi-conqueror Eisenhower but quickly resumed with his successors. In the decades that followed, as Democrats lost their New Deal grip on national power in both the presidency and in Congress, they panicked and their denunciations reached further lows in the crisis of the rise of Donald Trump. The forcefulness of FDR’s first inaugural abided across party lines with unfortunate results in both domestic and foreign policy.

We should have expected such impulsive behavior from Biden. After all, he bore a well-deserved reputation as a moral fanatic, especially on the subject of race. We witnessed that decades ago in the mudslinging during the 1987 Judge Bork confirmation hearings, as well as in the horrifying 1991 Clarence Thomas hearings

There has never been a federal law, let alone an executive order, mandating or requiring vaccination. Even the state law mandating vaccination, which the Supreme Court upheld in 1905, had a provision allowing the payment of $5 to avoid vaccination. The Occupational and Safety Health Administration (OSHA), which would apply the order, has never demanded vaccinations or regulated employees outside the workplace. In fact, the demand that all federal contractors (and their subcontractors) must comply or have their contracts withdrawn is laughable, as I discovered when I worked at the Department of Labor. Firings or employer penalties never happen, as the effect on the workers would be intolerable, and the unions would have to respond against the government, which won’t threaten to draft them. This is not to mention the difficulty of compliance in determining who is a subcontractor. It may take years to find out. 

Fortunately, constitutional means exist to resist this coup. Elements of the old constitution, however enfeebled, still exist—the separation of powers, federalism, the courts, and, we hope, elections. All are supported by the basic document of the United States, the Declaration of Independence, in its natural rights and its sober admonition to “suffer, while evils are sufferable . . . ”

But there is absolutely no precedent for what Biden demands. Obamacare may have required the purchase of health insurance (at the cost of incurring a modest fine), but requiring vaccination by executive order is a whole different level of power-grab and burden on individuals.

Given these enforcement burdens and the outrage they stir, I don’t think Biden is really concerned foremost about COVID. After all, the latest data about the recent surge, supposedly caused by the delta variant, shows considerable weakening. Biden should have taken the offensive on his vaccine mandate weeks ago, before it got confused with the mask mandate squabbles. 

The originality career plagiarist Biden brings to this fascism is in his peculiar racial appeal: it is not the racism or nationalism characteristic of European fascism but a peculiar racial identity based on self-hatred, making all problems of the human condition attributable to the white race—a collective guilt many of his supporters leap at embracing.

The chief reason Biden is fanatical about his vaccine mandate is that he knows perfectly well that the courts will have to declare them both illegal and unconstitutional. This will then, he must scheme, give him more authority among the gullible to justify transforming the judiciary—expanding the Supreme Court and altering the appellate powers of the federal courts of appeal. At the very least he might fantasize about getting Justice Stephen Breyer to resign and maybe persuade a couple liberal justices to support his actions. 

Thus, Biden, as he has so often before, wants to create a crisis: he wants an enraged public to condemn as immoral a court that would  strike down his executive orders and condemn to death the lives of vulnerable Americans.Such an evil institution should itself be declared unconstitutional. It must be healed immediately, before it sentences more vulnerable Americans to death. But he’s dealing with a court headed by a chief justice who knows how to be a graceful bullfighter.

In the meantime, the proper response to Biden’s coup against the rule of law is the F-word: fascist.


X22, Red Pill news, and more-Sept 22


 

Evening. Here's tonight's news:


Embrace Therapeutic Treatments for Covid, Because Science


Smug dismissals of therapeutic treatments for SARS-CoV-2 by the professional pundit class on the right, generally take the shape of posited psychological profiles of rubes who believe they’ve uncovered “secret knowledge” and so are especially susceptible to conspiracy theories…

…This kind of analysis is lazy and reliant on the animating caricatures that pre-determine the conclusion; it also gives the game away: though “those kinds of people” share a party kinship with the more thoughtful and evidence-based elect (as they fancy themselves to be), …

…there exists a demarcation that allows for an Othering within the politically-aligned collective. 

In this way, our self-styled “smart set” can create a barrier between themselves and the rubes awash in their fantasies of having found the “cure they don’t want you to know…

“…about”.

It’s a self-serving contrivance to bolster their already outsized belief in their own intellectual superiority — and as I noted previously, it’s an especially lazy and self-congratulatory one — so in that regard it’s a useful fiction. 

What it is not, however, is…

…a substantive rebuttal to those who’ve argued for early treatment protocols. In fact, it doesn’t address the issue in any honest way whatsoever. 

Let me explain to sneering chin-strokers like @JonahDispatch, or @DavidAFrench, or @davidfrum, or @CathyYoung63, or @Tracinski …

…what exactly it is we conspiracy-minded simpletons do and do not believe. 

First, and most importantly, those of us who have advocated for an early sequential treatment protocol don’t believe — and never have believed — in a “magic pill” to “cure” Covid-19. This…

…cartoonish suggestion began with Orange Man bad having mentioned HCQ, and the absolute determination of Very Serious Never Trumpers to cast doubt on anything the former President said that might prove both true and beneficial. The fact is, though, that Pfizer itself noted…

…HCQ’s efficacy, and the US had smartly stockpiled the drug after it showed effectiveness against other nascent corona viruses. 

The denunciations and medical lies told about HCQ were an obvious and unfortunate proxy for Trump hate, and many hundreds of thousands of our …

…fellow Americans have died unnecessarily as a result of the hubris and pettiness of the smart set, who joined with the health bureaucracies and praetorian guard media to denigrate a perfectly safe drug. 

The idea behind using HCQ — never alone as a treatment, but rather as…

…a component of a multi-drug approach to treating a respiratory virus, much as we learned to do with AIDS, after another failed Fauci-driven attempt to vaccinate out of existence — was simple and not at all medically controversial: HCQ is an excellent ionophore, which allows…

…for a crucial component of early treatment to work. That crucial component is zinc, which destroys certain enzymes that allow the virus to replicate with cells. But zinc alone cannot get inside cells, which is why the ionophore was necessary. A zpack was added to protect…

…against potential secondary bacterial infections like pneumonia. Vitamin D and Vitamin C were added as frontline doctors treating the virus noticed deficiencies in patients being hit hardest by the virus. 

It’s worth noting that the early treatment protocol has evolved and…

…strengthened as the challenges of a new variant emerged. 

The next great enemy of science then became Ivermectin, which showed clinical promise in a number of countries and is in several of those a first line defense. 

Ivermectin is a wonder drug — like HCQ, it is a WHO…

…essential medicine (meaning it is safe and effective) — that won 2 doctors the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015 for its treatment of River blindness. 

It is an anti-parasitic that is used in both humans and animals at dosages based on weight. Just as the anti-malarial HCQ…

…proved effective as an ionophore, an anti-inflammatory for rheumatoid arthritis, and even for treating dry eyes, IVM showed off-label promise in vitro as an anti-viral. 

But IVM’s most important role in early sequential treatment — and perhaps it’s worth pausing here to…

…describe the viral phases: viral infection in the nasal pharynx; replication; virus entering the respiratory system where it causes cytokine storm, leading to inflammation of organs; then micro-clotting, which destroys the lungs — is that it acts as a competitive…

…binding agent that shortens the replication phase and reduces viral load by blocking the virus from entering healthy cells. It can also disrupt viral replication intercellularly, augmenting the zinc. 

These medications, given early, cut down on the severity of infection…

…In fact, in my case, I began treatment after prophylaxis so early that the virus largely didn’t get into my chest. 

But say you didn’t start treatment immediately? Say you present with cytokine storm. While not ideal in terms of patient comfort, the next phase of sequential…

…treatment involves corticosteroids to reduce inflammation. Inhaled budesinide, prednisone, etc., address the issue and are then augmented with anti-coagulants to prevent the micro-clotting that can prove lethal. A regular dose aspirin or something similar will do the trick…

…As the months have progressed, and as treating doctors have learned more about the virus, additional therapies have shown promise, be it as prophylaxis or treatment. The gout medicine colchicine is an excellent and effective anti-inflammatory, a Canadian study showed; …

…fluvoxamine has shown to be effective against spike proteins that cross the blood-brain barrier. Concentrated Vitamin D that bypasses the liver to quickly raise levels is often used in later treatment. Lysine is being looked at. 

The point is, frontline doctors who have…

…treated the virus — and there aren’t many of them, for regulatory reasons that are as frightening as they are corrupt and insidious — have created alliances, shared research, and presented their findings of clinical application. The various early treatment protocols may use…

…a few different drugs or nutraceuticals, but they all share the same basic principal: treat the virus early and in sequence of viral progression. 

And yet this approach has been demonized and mocked — often by people who profess to distrust big government and in other…

…arenas preach individual liberty. They’ll bang the table telling you to build your own Google, but when it comes to medical freedom, they have stuck like plump sinecured barnacles to the dictates of the bureaucratic State. “Take the vaccine ffs,” Jonah will tell you, fresh…

…from penning another lazy horse-paste joke. 

But what people like Jonah and the “follow the science” cult never do is answer any real questions. For instance, why — after 19 months — do we still only have an inpatient treatment protocol (save mAB… [end part one]


Stop Le Steal: France’s Macron is Quietly Changing Election Dates and Pushing Mail-In Voting to Hold onto Power.

 

France’s summer was marred by the rollout of a national vaccine passport and the ensuing protests which continue to take place every Saturday across the country. In the midst of this social tension, a politically significant event was given little note.

In July, the French Interior Ministry – responsible for organizing national elections – presented the official dates for the upcoming and much anticipated 2022 Presidential election. While every French Presidential election runoff has occurred in early May since 1974, the government, with the approval of the nation’s council of Ministers, opted to advance the dates of the election to April 10th for the first round and April 24th for the runoff vote.

This change is significant because it conflicts with national public holidays.

French families typically align their vacations with the public school holidays. In fact, employers frequently require their employees to take their vacations during these breaks as a way of managing workflow.

 

 

School holiday dates are staggered depending on the different administrative regions of the country to avoid overcrowding of the domestic transportation system, and French workers often make use of their time off by traveling outside their home town to visit family and friends. During holiday seasons, certain regions experience an outflow of residents.

As a consequence, if a vote is scheduled during one of these periods, turnout is lower in regions where employees are on holiday because there is no early voting in France.

By scheduling the runoff election in early May when the workforce isn’t on break, the government was able to avoid conflicts with national holidays. Alternatively, when the dates did create a conflict, the government selected weeks when all regions’ vacations overlapped so as not to create regional discrepancies. This Presidential election will be different however because only a third of the country will be on holiday at the time of the vote. It’s the makeup of the regions which are on break during the runoff that gives rise to concern among the French opposition.

On April 24th 2022, the date of the runoff election, the northern region of France called “Hauts-de-France” and the southeastern region of “Provence-Alpes-Côte D’Azur” will be on holiday. Significantly, these are the two most unfavorable regions for the incumbent President Macron.

 

 On the one hand, the north of France is very blue-collar, a consequence of the dying heavy industry and mining sectors of the country. The electorate is very sympathetic to the populist political platforms advocated for by Marine Le Pen as well as the national left-wing opposition to Macron. The southeast on the other hand is a conservative bastion and favors the traditional right wing parties and Marine Le Pen over the incumbent President.

 

 

In France’s regional elections this past June, President Macron’s party did not make it into the runoff round in the north of France. His party achieved a meager nine percent of the vote despite even the French Attorney General campaigning on behalf of the President. In the southeast, Macron’s party decided not to field a candidate at all because the polls were so unfavorable.

During the 2017 French Presidential election, these two regions were the areas where Marine Le Pen performed the most favorably against Macron. Polls concerning the 2022 election suggest the runoff will once again pit these candidates against one another.

If Le Pen is to stand a chance of defeating the incumbent, she needs very high turnout in both the north and southeast of the country. It is unsurprising, therefore, that she has expressed concern about the election date and has called for the schedule to be modified.

Over the past two decades, voter turnout has been on the decline in France. Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, elections have seen the lowest participation levels in the country’s history.

 

 

According to political commentators and public officials, it is critical that the 2022 Presidential election see high voter turnout. The health of the country’s democracy depends on the perceived legitimacy of this election because of its central importance under the current constitution. The incumbent French administration’s decision to advance the runoff vote date coincides with talks of allowing for mail-in ballots which have been banned in the country since the 1970s because of the risk of fraud.

These moves by Macron’s government open the door to allegations of voter suppression and manipulation by the opposition which further polarizes and already tense French political landscape.

 

https://thenationalpulse.com/news/stop-le-steal-frances-macron-is-quietly-changing-election-dates-and-pushing-mail-in-voting-to-hold-onto-power/ 

 


 

HHS Whistleblower Calls Federal Government’s COVID Policies ‘Evil at the Highest Level’


A medical professional who works for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is blowing the whistle on the federal government for pushing dangerous experimental vaccines on an unsuspecting public, calling the malfeasance “evil at the highest level.”

“You have the FDA, you have the CDC, that are both supposed to be protecting us, Registered Nurse Jodi O’Malley told Project Veritas founder and CEO James O’Keefe, “and everything that we’ve done so far is unscientific.”

The whistleblower works at Phoenix Indian Medical Center, an Arizona hospital run by the Indian Health branch of HHS, but perhaps not for long. After contacting O’Keefe, she recorded some of her HHS colleagues raising concerns about the COVID vaccines. Putting her faith in God, O’Malley said that after everything she had witnessed, she was willing to lose her job to expose the federal government’s counterproductive and destructive COVID policies. 

O’Malley said the straw that broke the camel’s back for her was seeing a friend and colleague at the hospital be coerced against her will to get “the jab,” and then having to watch her die from a severe reaction days later.

According to the RN, “dozens” of people have come to the facility with adverse reactions to the vaccines. Another nurse explained on hidden camera that most of the cases aren’t reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) because it takes more time than most doctors are willing to take.

O’Malley’s hidden video features Dr. Maria Gonzales, an HHS ER physician, who complained that the department isn’t bothering to do any antibody testing, and no one is talking about it.

“The problem in here is that they are not doing the studies. People that had it [COVID] and the people that have been vaccinated — they’re not doing any antibody testing,” Gonzales said. “Everybody is quiet with that. Why?” the doctor asked plaintively.

O’Malley told Gonzales about a new patient, a 30-year-old man, who had come in with congestive heart failure after getting the second dose of the vaccine.

“Now, you got this guy in Room Four who got his second dose of the [COVID] vaccine on Tuesday and has been short of breath. Okay?” she said, adding that the patient was showing alarming results in several diagnostic tests.

“He’s probably got myocarditis!” Dr. Gonzales replied, adding, “All this is bullshit. Now probably myocarditis due to the vaccine.”

The doctor noted that “they are not going to blame the vaccine.”

O’Malley said that the patient’s doctor has an obligation to report the adverse reaction to the VAERS database, but Gonzales said doctors have not been doing that. 

“They have got to,” Gonzales said.

“But how many are reporting?” O’Malley asked.

Dr. Gonzales replied:  “They are not reporting … because they want to shove it under the mat.”

O’Malley told O’Keefe that she’d seen many instances of adverse side effects to the vaccines that were not reported.

“I’ve seen dozens of people come in with adverse reactions,” she said. One of those patients, O’Malley noted, was a 15-year-old boy who presented with blood clots. The teen had just gotten his first dose of the Pfizer vaccine three weeks ago.

“This is a 15-year-old, normal weight, healthy child. No reason for him to have a blood clot,” she explained.

O’Malley tearfully shared with O’Keefe the heartbreaking story that led her to blow the whistle on the federal government.

“What prompted me to do this was when I was House Supervisor one night, and one of my coworkers had taken the vaccine two weeks ago, and she didn’t want to. She went throughout this entire pandemic working in the intensive care unit, which pretty much was a COVID unit,” she said.

“She didn’t want to take [the COVID vaccine] because of her religious beliefs and she was coerced into taking it,” O’Malley said, fighting tears. “It’s like nobody — nobody should have to decide between their livelihood, being ‘a part of the team in the hospital,’ or take the [COVID] vaccine.”

Deanna Paris, another HHS RN told O’Malley on hidden camera that “it’s a shame that they’re not treating people like they’re supposed to—like they should.” The HHS insider shared an opinion that is nothing less than chilling. “I think they want people to die,” she said.

Paris told O’Malley that she has seen “a lot” of sick vaccinated patients at the hospital, but “nobody” was reporting the critical information about vaccine side effects to VAERS because “it takes over a half an hour to fill out the damn thing.”

O’Malley said that because the vaccines are still in stage 3 clinical trials, every medical facility should be collecting data. 

“So, what the responsibility on everyone is — is to gather that data and report it. If we’re not gathering [COVID vaccine] data and reporting it, then how are we going to say that this is safe and approved for use?” she asked.

The whistleblower also recorded an ER doctor defending the federal government’s handling of COVID research and reporting.

“So how come after 18 months, we haven’t had any research? Isn’t that fishy to you?” O’Malley asked

Gonzales agreed. “It does — it is fishy,” she responded.

But Dr. Dale McGee said, “it’s not that it hasn’t been done. It hasn’t been published, that’s why.”

Gonzales shot back: “It hasn’t probably been done because the government doesn’t want to show that the darn vaccine is full of sh—t.”

O’Malley also filmed medical staff confirming that hospital policy forbids the use of “off label” medical treatments like hydroxychloroquine, and Ivermectin. 

A hospital pharmacist told O’Malley that she was not allowed to fill a doctor’s prescription for Ivermectin, an ant-parasite drug that has been proven in multiple studies to be a helpful treatment for patients with mild to moderate cases of the coronavirus.

“I am stuck. I am told that you are absolutely not to use it under any circumstances whatsoever for somebody with COVID, unless you don’t want to have a job,” HHS pharmacist Gayle Lundberg said on hidden video. “I am not going to lose my job over this.”

O’Malley opined that people throughout the country are being driven by fear.

“Are you afraid?” O’Keefe asked the nurse.

“It’s my career, you know?,” she replied. “It’s how I help people. But am I afraid? I wouldn’t necessarily say I am afraid because my faith lies in God and not man. So, I have two older kids that are on their own, and I have a twelve-year-old at home that I care for on my own, but you know, what kind of person would I be if I knew all of this — this is evil. This is evil at the highest level. You have the FDA, you have the CDC, that are both supposed to be protecting us, but they are under the government, and everything that we’ve done so far is unscientific.”

O’Keefe asked the whistleblower if she was afraid she would be retaliated against.

“Yeah. I’m a federal employee. What other federal employees do you see coming out?” she asked rhetorically.

“But you put your faith in God,” O’Keefe noted.

“Amen, O’Malley responded. “At the end of the day, it’s about your health, and you can never get that back — and about your freedom, and about living in a peaceful society, and I’m like, ‘no.’ No. This is the hill that I will die on.”


Update:

An official from the Phoenix Medical Center sent out an email to members acknowledging that the video is “distressing,” and urging them to come forward if they “have information to share.”

Tuesday morning, Facebook and Instagram took down all posts sharing Project Veritas’ story, saying it went against their “community standards on misinformation that could cause physical harm.”

O’Keefe read Instagram’s message to him in a video streamed live on his and Project Veritas’ Instagram accounts.

“We encourage free expression, but don’t allow false information about COVID that could contribute to physical harm,” the message read, according to O’Keefe.

“This is a real person working for the federal government. Nobody’s ever done this before,” the muckraker pointed out. “Who filmed an ER doctor—this is not pretend, it’s not fake. This is real information! People in their own words [in] undercover videos! It’s not fake, it’s not false—it’s real! But they’re saying it’s false!” O’Keefe exclaimed.

Project Veritas’ “HHS Insider” video remains on YouTube for now, and currently has 2,268,041 views.


Hey, the Hunter-laptop story was legit after all

 Politico Playbook: 

Hey, the Hunter-laptop story was legit after all

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, Pool

The deuce you say. Maybe the rest of the national media shouldn’t have rushed to bury the story of Hunter Biden’s laptop in the first place, huh? A new book from a Politico reporter belatedly clears the decks for a reassessment of the Bidens, especially Hunter and his nexus between powerful interests and “the big guy”:

FIRST IN PLAYBOOK — Ben Schreckinger’s “The Bidens: Inside the First Family’s Fifty-Year Rise to Power,” out today, finds evidence that some of the purported HUNTER BIDEN laptop material is genuine, including two emails at the center of last October’s controversy.

A person who had independent access to Hunter Biden’s emails confirmed he did receive a 2015 email from a Ukrainian businessman thanking him for the chance to meet Joe Biden. The same goes for a 2017 email in which a proposed equity breakdown of a venture with Chinese energy executives includes the line, “10 held by H for the big guy?” (This person recalled seeing both emails, but was not in a position to compare the leaked emails word-for-word to the originals.)

MORE: Emails released by a Swedish government agency also match emails in the leaked cache, and two people who corresponded with Hunter Biden confirmed emails from the cache were genuine.

Gee, just imagine if the national media had taken an interest in asking these questions eleven months ago. Instead, not only did these outlets immediately dismiss the Hunter-laptop story as fake news, social media platforms began blocking any discussion of it — to the point of suspending the New York Post’s Twitter accounts. Facebook not only suppressed it, but bragged about creating an algorithm to automatically suppress it. We’ll get back to that point in the end.

In fairness, Schreckinger had been among the few journalists to cast a critical eye on the Bidens and their fortunes, literal and figurative. I believe he coined the term “Biden Inc” to describe the cashing-in strategies of Hunter and his uncles on connections made by Joe Biden in his political capacities. That began in earnest two months before the Post’s stories about Hunter’s laptop, although Schreckinger had begun this thread in March with James Biden’s Americore health-industry cash-in.

National media outlets had plenty of context regarding corruption issues within Biden Inc before the NY Post revealed the contents of Hunter’s laptop. Had they bothered to pay a fraction of the attention Schreckinger did to those corruption issues, the laptop story would have made much more sense. (As it did to those of us who had paid attention to Biden Inc.) Instead, they practically broke their figurative ankles in a rush to bury the story, perhaps out of political bias, or perhaps out of embarrassment for having been caught napping on the story. Maybe it was a blend of both.

And now we find out, thanks to Schreckinger again, that the details in the core laptop story could have been confirmed if anyone had bothered to ask. That prompts the question I just asked — why didn’t national news outlets bother to ask? The answer, one presumes, is that they preferred a corrupt Biden to a cantankerous Trump. That’s a legitimate choice for voters, but it’s an unconscionable ethical violation for a free press.

That’s the point that Glenn Greenwald is making today on this revelation:

Funny about that, eh?


Only Nine Months In And The Biden Presidency Has Failed Spectacularly



It’s hard to keep up the illusion that you’re the answer to an entire country’s ills when seemingly everything you touch falls apart. President Joe Biden is learning this lesson the hard way, with his endeavors regarding the coronavirus, foreign policy, and national security all wreaking havoc simultaneously.

As the Associated Press documented, in one single hour on Friday afternoon, Biden and his team failed spectacularly on Afghanistan, ate crow on their next attempted COVID-19 milestone, and ticked off the United States’ longest ally. 

For starters, the Pentagon revealed that the Kabul drone strike that Biden authorized in late August after the failed Afghanistan withdrawal not only wasn’t successful in taking out terrorists but instead killed 10 innocent civilians, including seven children. This is the airstrike that Gen. Mark Milley, who is under fire for making potentially treasonous phone calls to his communist Chinese counterpart, originally called “righteous.” It’s the drone strike that the administration falsely claimed had killed two “high-profile” terrorists.

But that wasn’t true. “The strike was a tragic mistake,” Marine Gen. Frank McKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, admitted during a Friday news conference.

Then there was the vote by a panel advising the Food and Drug administration — a vote that wasn’t even close, by the way — not to recommend COVID vaccine booster shots for everyone over age 16. So much for Biden’s “trust the science” vaccine ambitions.

Finally, an angry France, a country that’s been a U.S. ally since 1778, announced it was pulling its ambassador to the United States after some submarine deal that Biden struck with Australia and the United Kingdom. According to the French foreign ministry, it’s never recalled its ambassador to the U.S. until now.

That all happened on the same afternoon. “It was an hour President Joe Biden would no doubt like to forget,” the AP narrated.

It’s an afternoon President Joe Biden no doubt did forget while it was still happening, given his recent track record on mental fortitude. And it’s an afternoon the corrupt press “forgot” as soon as it happened too, with a handful of Sunday news shows not even mentioning the report about the “tragic mistake” of a drone strike, according to Fox News.

But as these life-and-death failures continue to pile up in the Biden administration’s “L” column, the American people should not so soon forget.

This is the man who promised a return to normal but is instead pressuring private establishments to require vaccines and pushing government agencies to roll out boosters, science be damned. This is the president who promised an end to America’s endless wars but instead got 13 U.S. service members killed in his disaster of a withdrawal, green-lighted a drone strike that left little boys and girls dead, and keeps telling the stories of his own personal tragedies to garner sympathy for himself. This is the president who promised America was “back at the table” and “back in the business of leading the world” but instead angers America’s allies and does business with our enemies.

With a campaign slogan devoid of meaning, Joe Biden promised he would “build back better.” Instead, with this commander-in-chief, it’s one step forward, 10 steps back, plus human casualties and lost liberties all along the way. Joe Biden’s hour of mayhem on Friday wasn’t a fluke of his administration; it was a feature. And though his team and the media would no doubt like to forget it, we’d all do well to remember.


Germany Wants To Force Gab To Censor, It’s Not Happening


This week we received a huge packet of documents with fines and legal threats from the nation state of Germany. Gab is refusing, and has refused for many years, to comply with the German Network Enforcement Act. Gab is a US company and as such we are under zero obligation to obey foreign laws from tyrannical governments.

For those unfamiliar, the Network Enforcement Act is a draconian German law aimed at combatting “fake news” on social networking websites. “Fake news” is of course, whatever the German Government says it is.

For example this week Facebook deleted 150 accounts belonging to an anti-lockdown movement in Germany, likely at the behest of the German government under the Network Enforcement Act.

Because of Gab’s unwillingness to participate in State-mandated censorship of free speech, the German government is now coming after our bootstrapped tech startup with heavy fines and other legal action.

 Gab is not a lawless website. We work diligently to stop and prevent illegal activity from taking place on our platform. We have great relationships with many foreign countries who understand and respect our position on free speech and appreciate our zero tolerance for criminal activity. The German government isn’t concerned about any actual criminal activity, they are concerned with Thought Criminals who dare to dissent against their globalist regime.

According to our legal team, who has been working with us on this issue for several months, we have three choices.

1) Obey German censorship laws and start censoring content that the German Government doesn’t like (this is not going to happen)

2) Disobey German censorship laws and pick a fight with the nation state of Germany (I likely wouldn’t ever be able to leave the US again, they would come at us from every possible angle through state-sponsored deplatforming, heavy fines, they would possibly leverage contacts in the Biden Admin to come after Gab in other ways, and Lord knows what else.)  

3) Temporarily stop providing this service in Germany by blocking German IPs.

I hate everything about these choices, which is why we went public with this information to gather feedback and consensus from our community on the topic.

The overwhelming majority of people have been very supportive of the third option. Our lawyers are suggesting this option. Our community is suggesting this option. I’ve had many people email me and reach out privately to say that this is our best course of action. We seem to have a consensus.

Yet it doesn’t sit right with me.

Ultimately as the CEO of Gab I alone need to make this decision. These are the types of decisions that define a man and make history. If we block German IPs to appease the German government that sets a precedent that other countries will want to follow. We are not IP blocking ourselves into a corner here. If the German government wants to stop German IPs from accessing Gab they can block us themselves.

Why should we block an entire country from accessing Gab because their government is sending us fines we won’t pay and veiled legal threats that mean nothing to Gab as a US corporation? I won’t be able to travel to Europe anyway because I’m not getting injected with an experimental substance. On the bright side I now have a huge stack of kindling paper for my wood stove this winter.

The reality is the German government has zero authority or jurisdiction over how we operate Gab. We have no corporate entity in Germany, we have no employees in Germany, and we are not German citizens. We are Americans.

In America you play by our rules, we don’t play by yours. Germany is a guest in our community and they will respect our values and way of doing things, not the other way around. I have nothing but love for the German people and they too deserve the fundamental human right to speak freely on the internet.

Our mission is to defend free speech online for all people, everywhere. Including in Germany. We will continue to do that, regardless of any threats from foreign governments. If we bow to Germany today, what’s to stop us from bowing to literal tyrants, such as those in Russia (like Google and Apple did just last week) or China (as Apple has done for years)?  

In matters pertaining to serious crime, German police forces already know how to reach us, as indeed they have done many times in the past. We will continue to respond to those requests and provide prompt assistance to those police forces on a voluntary basis. What we will not do is restrict access to, or remove, content which is legal in the United States on or from servers in the United States.

As I write this today is the day the American Constitution was signed over 234 years ago. We must stand up now to defend it and fight for the freedoms enshrined in it, which come from God, for all nations.

I’m not sure what will come of this decision, but I will not make an important choice like this from a position of fear. I leave the outcomes of this decision in the hands of God Almighty and I pray that the German people will take back their country and freedoms very soon.

Until then: wir werden nicht nachgeben, “Nuts!”. (we will not comply, Nuts!)

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab.com
Only Jesus Saves  






Why Freedom is in Serious Jeopardy

 Why Freedom is in Serious Jeopardy



Disunity and the acceptance of authoritarianism.

There are many ways in which to divide humanity — the decent and the indecent, the happy and the unhappy, the cowardly and the courageous, those who lead and those who follow, etc.

Two major divisions that are less often noted but highly consequential are between those who want to control others and those who have little interest in controlling others, and between the related categories of those who are comfortable with being controlled by others and those who detest being controlled by others.

Those who seek to control others and those who seek to be controlled by others would seem to be on opposite ends of the political spectrum. But they are not. Both groups are overwhelmingly populated by individuals on the Left.

They currently dominate four of the five English-speaking countries (the United Kingdom may be the one exception). The ease with which Australians, Canadians and New Zealanders have accepted the loss of liberty in their respective countries has been the saddest and most frightening development since the rise of totalitarianism in the early 20th century.

Even sadder and more frightening has been the acceptance of authoritarianism by half of the American people. America has been the beacon of liberty in the world. America was the country to which France gave the Statue of Liberty. America has been, as President Abraham Lincoln characterized it, "the last best hope of Earth." America's self-image has been that of a "sweet land of liberty" and of "the land of the free and home of the brave."

Then came a new virus (one with a survival rate in the 99% range for nearly all age groups except older adults who are also very sick), and suddenly, in the name of "public health," no amount of suppression of liberty, no matter how irrational, has been resisted by the majority of Americans or almost any citizens of the other English-speaking countries.

The citizens of Australia's biggest states are not allowed to leave their homes for more than a few hours a day, not allowed to congregate with other citizens even outdoors, not allowed even to speak with one another outdoors. For more than a year and a half, Australians have not been allowed to leave their country without the express permission of their government, which will decide whether they have a good enough reason. And, of course, church services are forbidden. Australians, Canadians and New Zealanders, most of whom are thoroughly secular, have only contempt for their compatriots who wish to attend religious services.

In many arenas of life, most Australians have fewer rights than most Soviet citizens did. Like Australians, Soviet citizens could not leave their country without permission, but they were allowed to leave their homes, to speak with people in the street and to visit dying relatives in hospitals.

Meanwhile, a large percentage of Americans support a president of the United States who offers government and an enormous number of private-entity workers a choice between getting vaccinated — no matter how young they are, and whether they already had COVID-19 — or losing their job. In other words, many Americans support firing any unvaccinated fellow citizens who work for the government, the medical professions or privately owned companies with 100 or more employees.

Half of America supports a president who portrays the other half of America as an enemy, their fellow Americans as people for whom they should have hatred. No American president has ever given as divisive a speech as the one in which President Joe Biden announced his vaccine mandates (something he denied wanting to impose only nine months ago, in December of 2020). Lincoln, despite the Civil War, a war in which more Americans were killed than in all other American wars combined, called on Americans to have "malice toward none." Biden, as mean-spirited a president as this country has ever had, has called for malice toward 100 million Americans, declaring, "our patience is wearing thin."

There is a three-pronged left-wing assault on liberty: in the name of public health (COVID-19); in the name of "anti-racism"; and in the name of saving the planet (climate change). By ratcheting up fear and hysteria, the Left is using each to end individual liberty, including freedom of speech, for the first time in American history.

Will the Left succeed?

Unless Americans fight the Left as hard as the Union fought the slave states, the answer is yes.