White House Extends National Election Emergency Authority for Federal Agencies to Enter State Election Databases for Mid-Term Election

Sundance reporting for Conservative Treehouse

In the lead-up to the critical 2018 mid-term elections, President Trump’s political opposition needed a control mechanism in order to remove him from office and support the impeachment path.  The administrative state -writ large- produced an overwhelming narrative leading to the issuance of a Executive Declaration of A National Emergency to Avoid Foreign Interference in Our Elections.

At the time the narrative was framed (mid-2018), the argument was: if President Trump did not declare the emergency, and grant the federal intelligence community the right to enter state election databases and “monitor” the activity therein, that refusal itself would be proof Donald Trump was a Russian asset.  Remember, the Mueller investigation was at its apex and the office of the president was surrounded by administration officials like Mike Pence (VP), Jeff Sessions, Rod Rosenstein (DOJ), Alexander Vindman (NSC), Dana Boente (FBI), Dan Coats (DNI), Michael Attkinson (ICIG), et al; all of them carrying ulterior motives.

President Trump signed the emergency declaration and granted the Intelligence Branch of Government full access to the state-level election systems.

In short, President Trump was forced by his Machiavellian captors to seal his own fate.  Yes, this is how the DC apparatus works.  The Intelligence Branch of Government works with their political agents within the legislative branch and simultaneously coordinate with their media operatives to surround the target with fire until the action they need is executed.   In the fall of 2018, the unrelenting pressure worked exactly as designed.  [Federal Register]

It was not coincidental that most of the new 2018 Democrat candidates for office came from former and/or current CIA and intelligence agencies.   A few people wondered why so many ‘new’ DNC approved candidates were from the intelligence agencies of the government.  Some even coined the phrase “CIA Democrats“, but for the most part it was ignored.  The 2018 federal election outcome was delivered exactly as planned.  Democrats took control of the House of Representatives and paved the way for Mueller to deliver what they needed for articles of impeachment.

Fast forward to 2020, and the same Federal Declaration of a National Election Emergency was used to support the COVID mail-in ballot narrative, while the same intelligence branch operatives coordinated with state-level political activists to manipulate the outcome.

Just like Antifa could not exist without the support of the FBI, so too could the five state, seven county, plan not have been successful without coordinated support at the federal level.  Someone had to trigger the “all stop” at 1:00am ET on the morning of 11/4/20 in order to evaluate how many ballots would be needed to change the direction of the current vote as recorded at that moment.  In my opinion, that directing agency was federal…. with database access as an outcome of the previous Emergency Declaration.

“(d) the term “election infrastructure” means information and communications technology and systems used by or on behalf of the Federal Government or a State or local government in managing the election process, including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting tabulation equipment, and equipment for the secure transmission of election results;” (Link to Fed Register)

So here we are, September 7, 2021, with a mid-term federal election coming again.  The scale of what took place in 2018 and 2020 was transparently massive.   Now, think about how many people currently stand against the Biden administration.  Think about the current scale of his drop in support that was mostly cardboard cutouts and fake voters to begin with.   Think about how much more manipulation will be needed in this 2022 mid-term….  not to win, but rather just to control and stem the severity of the loss?

That’s the backdrop for this announcement from the White House:

[…] “Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcomes or vote tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system.” …  “For this reason, the national emergency declared on September 12, 2018, must continue in effect beyond September 12, 2021. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13848 with respect to the threat of foreign interference in or undermining public confidence in United States elections.”  (LINK)

Any state that is granting the federal government permission to “electronically monitor” their voting system is granting the Intelligence Branch of the U.S. Government full control to modify, manipulate and change the actual voting results.

You see, once the government takes an action that is so drastic, so consequential and so corrupt in scale, they enter a place where there is no upper limit on what actions need to be taken in order to protect the prior lawlessness.   This same zero-sum principle was applied during the Obama-era surveillance operation against candidate Trump.  Once the Obama team weaponized the intelligence apparatus, specifically by accessing the NSA database to conduct monitoring of electronic communication, they entered a world where there was no way to exit.

That same corrupt snowball is still rolling…

[Understand the Fourth Branch Here]

NCIS Hawaii new promo and NCIS LA info from TV Line

 

Today has been a busy day for with NCIS franchise info! Today, CBS released a new promo for NCIS Hawaii (it's down below). Looks amazing!

And a few hours ago, TV Line released 2 new spoilers for NCIS LA Season 13:

The 19th episode is supposed to be the milestone 300th episode. Given how good the 250th episode was, I have high hopes for this episode next year.

What do you all think?

NCIS Hawaii starts Sept 20 (11 days from now!)

NCIS LA Season 13 starts Oct 10

Does The Definition Of ‘Fascism’ Apply To The Biden Administration?

Erasing the line between government and private enterprise. 

Ensuring only government-approved messages are heard. 

Squashing dissent. Intruding government into every aspect of our lives.

by Ben Carson for The Federalist

Here is a challenge: Define fascism without reference to a historical event or proper noun.

It’s harder than it seems. Most people associate fascism with European dictatorships of the 1920s and ’30s. That is with good reason: those were the first fascist regimes.

The term itself originated in Italy to describe the political philosophy of Benito Mussolini, who borrowed from the Italian word fascio, literally meaning “bundle” (usually of rods or sticks). Mussolini used the term to mean a group of people who are stronger together than individually, such as how a bundle of sticks bound together is much more difficult to snap than any individual stick.

While most fascist regimes had racial or nationalist elements, it was not racism or nationalism that defined them; there have been plenty of racist or nationalist governing structures that do not merit the label “fascism.” Rather, the necessary ingredient for fascism is the state’s total domination of all aspects of life, including economic life.

Mussolini defined “fascism” as “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.” Consistent with this, the American Heritage Dictionary includes in its definition of fascism “a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls.” By hook or by crook, and many times using violence, a fascist government will brook no dissent and will enlist all of the country’s institutions to further its ends.

During the Trump administration, the left took every opportunity to falsely claim that fascism was descending upon the land. But anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear knew those claims were outlandish.

There was plenty “outside the State” and “against the State” during the Trump administration (he is still banned on all major social media platforms, for example) and plenty of dissent. There were plenty of institutions that explicitly declared themselves in opposition to the aims of the government.

Nothing Outside of or Against the Regime

Fully cognizant of George Orwell’s quip that “Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies ‘something not desirable,’” I am becoming concerned that what many claimed to be happening under the Trump administration is becoming reality under the Biden administration.

I do not make that statement lightly. But events over the past several weeks suggest that the Biden administration, in concert with powerful American institutions, is working to ensure that there is nothing outside of or against the official government line.

Last month White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki admitted the administration works closely with Facebook and other social media companies to identify posts it deems objectionable. While Psaki claimed the White House does not “take anything down” or “block anything,” there would be no reason for the White House to point out these statements if not in the hope of social media platforms taking action against posts contrary to the government’s preferred narrative.

Also, more news continues to come out about how the Biden administration is coordinating with private businesses to further its agenda. According to Politico, the White House is “back channeling” with various media organizations about COVID coverage, particularly arguing that the media’s focus on breakthrough infections of people who have already been vaccinated undermines the administration’s efforts to get more people vaccinated. Relatedly, the New York Times has reported the administration “continues to pressure private companies to introduce coronavirus vaccine mandates to help the U.S. raise its inoculation rates.”

Using Private Businesses to Implement Policy

Regardless of what anyone thinks of the wisdom of the administration’s policies, it should be concerning to all to have the White House directly involved in the operations of private companies. This is especially true when the White House’s focus is on heavily regulated companies, such as broadcast networks. Those are the companies least likely to be able to resist government requests, which always carry the implicit terms of, “Nice business you got there; it would be a shame if anything happened to it.”

It is all the more troubling that the White House is leaning on private companies to do that which the federal government cannot do itself, namely censoring individuals from expressing opinions contrary to the government’s preferred message, and mandating that everyone in America take a certain medicine. This should concern everyone because once you have endorsed the idea that the federal government can and should use private businesses as a tool to implement policy it cannot establish through legal means, there is no limiting principle. Should the government “pressure private companies” to not hire women who have had abortions? Not hire anyone who supported Trump?

It is not enough to claim the administration is doing this only in response to the COVID emergency. Washington is full of programs that were instituted in response to an “emergency” that has well since passed. This fusion of government goals and private action will just find a new problem to solve. Today it is COVID. Tomorrow it will be climate change or systemic racism.

You do not need to take my word for it: in just the past few days the administration announced “goals” for the adoption of electric vehicles in the United States (why it is the federal government’s business to set “goals” for consumer behavior was left unsaid). Standing there right behind the administration were the largest automakers in the country, cheering on the policy so long as there were sufficient government-funded “investments” and “consumer incentives” (read: subsidies). This hand-in-glove cooperation between big government and big business is exactly the kind of “corporatism” that was an essential feature of fascist states of the past.

Erasing the line between government and private enterprise. Ensuring only government-approved messages are heard. Squashing dissent. Intruding government into every aspect of our lives. The Biden administration’s actions are nothing less than creeping fascism.

I pray that the administration, and the American people, recognize this and change course before it is too late.

X22, Red Pill news, and more-Sept 9

 

I know today has been difficult for everyone who has a job, but I hope tonight's videos help.

#WeWillNotComply

White House Occupant Announces Mandatory Vaccines for American Workers

The disposable White House occupant delivered remarks on his unconstitutional objective to force vaccinations for all American workers. His ulterior objective was apparently to turn Americans against each other by telling the vaxxed people that all their problems can be blamed on the unvaxxed. 

Democrats Skate to Where the Puck Was

 Democrats Skate to Where the Puck Was

Erick-Woods Erickson22 hr ago

This is a transcript from my radio show. 

---

Wayne Gretzky had a quote that Steve Jobs embraced for Apple, "Skate to where the puck is going to be." Apple doesn’t always get it right. They got it very wrong with one of their Macbook Pros a number of years ago. But they skate to where the puck is going to be by envisioning where the world is heading and designing products the world does not yet know it needs.

The problem with the Democrats' bill, whatever you want to call, their infrastructure bill, their reconciliation bill, their domestic spending bill, their climate bill, they're skating to where the puck was... not where it's going to be. Let me again read you this. This is now from Jonathan Weisman at the New York Times breaking down what is going to be, with excerpts in the Politico.

"To grasp the intended measure scope, consider a life, from conception to death, Democrats intend to fund paid family and medical leave to allow a parent to take some time off during pregnancy and after a child's birth. When that parent is ready to return to work, expanded funding for childcare would kick in to help cover daycare costs. When the child turns three, another part of the bill, universal pre-kindergarten, would ensure public education can begin at an earlier age regardless of where that child lives. Most families with children would continue to receive federal income supplements each month in the form of an expanded child tax credit that was created temporarily by Mr. Biden's pandemic rescue law and would be extended by the new social policy bill.

"School nutrition programs expanded on an emergency basis during the pandemic would continue to offer more children free and reduced-price meals long after the coronavirus retreats. And at high school graduation, most students would be guaranteed two years of higher education through our expanded federal financial aid geared towards community colleges. Even after that, income supplements and generous workforce training programs would keep the government present in many adult lives. In old age, people would be helped by tax credits to offset the cost of elder care by the expansion of Medicare to cover dental, hearing, and vision."

They're skating to where the puck was, and what I mean by that is the pandemic has unquestionably and objectively changed our society. If you've paid attention to any of the trendline research that's out there right now, across the board... it doesn't matter whether you're getting it from a liberal think tank, a conservative think tank, a nonpartisan think tank, or the government itself. It shows moms aren't going back to work. It's one of the reasons we're having a labor shortage in this country. Moms are not going back to work.

They've decided, particularly in married households, they can actually survive on one income or can do something from home. Many have started Etsy shops or gotten into crafts and can sell stuff online and supplement the family income. They're not going back to work. So they don't need paid family time off because they're not working anyway. 

But wait, there's more. Parents, liberal and conservative, are checking out of public schools, so a federal school lunch program doesn't really amount to much when your kid's not in public school. Universal pre-K doesn't really amount to much when your kid's not in pre-K. Extra education funding for elementary and secondary school doesn't really amount to much when your kid's not in public school.

The virus, the fallout from the virus, and the government's response to the virus has caused an upending of the American way of life. We have a labor shortage in this country. We've got a surplus of jobs and not enough people to fill them right now in the country. Some of it has to do with extended unemployment, but not all of it. Some of it is families realized in the pandemic under lockdown that they are perfectly fine living on one income. They made cutbacks and are okay. Many families decided their kids are better off not in the woke public school system and opted for private school, homeschooling, or a homeschool alliance.

Meanwhile, the Democrats have prepared a $3.5 trillion budget program based on the way the world worked before the virus affected everyone's life. That's not functional. But more importantly, it just doesn't pan out. It doesn't work. It's not a viable option for people, because to take advantage of it, you must re-embrace a lifestyle that you rejected during the pandemic that you don't want to go back to.

Parents who started homeschooling their kids realized they're having a meaningful impact on their kids and would have to give it all up and send them back to the failing public schools, the government-run schools with common core, drugs, wokeness, and all that nonsense. The Democrats have failed to be imaginative. They've got lots of creative things in here for climate change, and it's all very disruptive to the American economy. But they fail to be imaginative when it comes to the way the family is going to look and operate. They fail to recognize the needs of the modern family, and this is part of the problem.

When the Democratic Party and the upper echelons of the Democratic Party are taking leadership direction from a bunch of childless Progressives, you can't really understand the way that families working. And yes, I'm not trying to be pejorative or mean, but at the upper echelons of the policy-making factions of the Democratic Party now, you've got a host of people who are childless, and you've got a bunch of young congressional staffers shaping this legislation who have no intention of having a kid unless they can have one to be able to abort it to say they've had an abortion. They're the ones who want to set social policy for the rest of us. You can't do that. You're not skating to where the puck is going to be. You're skating to where the puck was before lockdowns happened, before COVID happened.

They want to foist a $3 trillion package on us in this way. That's not going to be sustainable. It's not going to work. Families are not going to rearrange their lives according to the government. The government needs to rearrange its priorities according to the way families have rearranged their lives. This is going to lead inevitably to a war on homeschooling. We're going to eventually see the left come for homeschools in ways they have not before. They have certainly come for homeschools, but not in the way they're about to. They've got to get kids back into public schools because of these programs.

They're going to try to force a square peg into a round hole, and it's going to have cataclysmic problems for the Democrats. But on top of that, they may not even be able to get it passed altogether anyway. They may not be able to get it passed because they can only lose three Democrats in the House. They're beginning to balk at the price tag. Joe Manchin in the Senate has come out and said, "Whoa, Whoa, wait a second, guys. Maybe this is too much. Maybe we've gone too far. Maybe we shouldn't be doing this".

They're going to have problems with the politics. They're going to have problems with the votes. They're going to have problems with the policies themselves. When you're shaping society through federal legislation, $3.5 trillion worth of federal legislation, and you're shaping that society based on the way the world no longer works, you can't expect society to embrace it and you can't expect your Democratic members in the House or the Senate, who are up for election next year, to want to fall on the sword to placate a bunch of public policy prognosticators who are prognosticating based on where the puck was in society, not where it's going to be. You can't ask them to do. Now they're going to ask them to do it, but it's going to be suicide for Joe Biden's agenda.

And here's the thing. This is Joe Biden's agenda. He wants to be the second coming of JFK. He's already given us Vietnam and Afghanistan, and now he wants to give us the bankrupting great society. He is fixated on LBJ and LBJ's legacy, but it's not going to work. We're not living in 2021 like we were in 2019. And I realize, that's a lot for public policymakers to keep up with. Public policymakers tend to grasp something and hold onto it for a decade past irrelevance. We're now two years past irrelevance and they can't adapt quick enough. I get that. I'm sympathetic to it. Whether it's Republican or Democrat, they run into these problems.

But it's very obvious, based on the current trendlines of data, more mothers are staying home, more women are getting married, staying married, having kids, and decided they don't need to be work-at-home or work-from-work moms. You're having more and more people homeschooling their kids or sending their kids to homeschool cooperatives or sending their kids to private schools, not public schools. Public schools are showing a year-over-year decline, and the Democrats' entire framework for this $3.5 trillion spending project is outdated based on the data. Yet they want Democrats to vote for it. They want you to embrace it and vote for them based on giving you a massive public handout that you can't even take advantage of anymore because you're not going back to work and your kids aren't going to public school. It's not going to work out well for them.

The Ronacoaster, Once You Get in the Vaccine Car You Ain’t Getting Off Until The Ride’s Over

posted by Sundance at Conservative Treehouse

For several months I have been dispassionately following multiple data-streams about the SARS-CoV-2 virus, aka COVID-19, the vaccinations and the variants.  Just following data; just following discussions of data; just looking at public statements by those who generate information about the data.  All of it from a generally ambivalent position, willing to hear, review, contemplate and give consideration to any possibility.

♦ Should I get Vaccinated? – Like a bubble on a level, the outcome of analysis sometimes goes in one direction, sometimes goes in the other.  However, for approximately 8 weeks the level has tilted.  While there is still a possibility something drastic might change the big picture outcome, the weight of the data is only going in one direction now.

A recent public release from the Los Angeles County Public Health department [link here] is yet another data-point in an assembly of larger data-points, but it is time to accept that alternative data-points are not likely to tilt the analytical level back in the pro-jab direction.   It seems innocuous, but look at the highlight within the statement:

(SOURCE LINK)

Essentially, the LA public health officials are stating the exact same thing that Dr. Anthony Fauci said last Sunday on CBS Face The Nation.   The Mu variant is showing greater infectious transmissibility, and simultaneously the data shows this variant -yet again- has an ability to evade the vaccine induced specific antibodies.

The Delta variant had the same set of traits as described above for Mu.   Greater transmissibility, greater ability to avoid vaccine induced antibodies, but less deadly than the original virus.  This mutation (ie variant) is why vaccinated persons were later discovered to be capable of being infected (with higher loads of virus) and transmitting or shedding the variant at higher levels.  Thus, the need for a booster to target the Delta variant (shot 3).

The Lambda variant had the same set of traits as the Delta variant.  Greater transmissibility, greater ability to avoid vaccine induced antibodies, but less deadly than the Delta strain.  This mutation (ie variant) is why vaccinated persons (2 shots) who also had the booster (shot 3) were capable of being infected and transmitting the next variant.  Thus the need for booster shot 4 (see Israel).

The Mu variant now has the same set of traits as the Lambda and Delta variant.  Greater tranmissibiltiy, greater ability to avoid vaccine induced antibodies, but likely less deadly than the Delta and Lambda strain.   It is yet to be determined if booster shot 5 will be needed (Israel beta-test), or if BigPharma can blend, or as Dr. Fauci stated Sunday “mix and match”, vaccine ingredients from Delta and Mu into one mRNA booster in the U.S. which would technically be called booster one (shot three).

Bottom line, the vaccine makers are chasing variants and modifying the “vaccine” shots to keep up.

The COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, virus was created in a lab.  The vaccine was created to address that virus. However, the vaccine created variants.  The variants require boosters…. which generate variants…. which require boosters…. which generate variants.   It seems like one long ronacoaster that you get locked into once you take the vaccine, and you ain’t getting off until the strain of the variant gets so weak that it no longer requires a booster to chase it.

If you accept the virus was created in a lab, then this quest to chase its variants does actually make sense.

This was the warning message sent out by renowned vaccine researcher Geert Vanden Bossche [SEE HERE], who received his DVM from the University of Ghent, Belgium, and his PhD degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany.  Dr. Bossche sent an early warning letter about this exact scenario to the World Health Organization.  [pdf LETTER HERE].

Dr. Bossche is not alone in his research and opinion.  This is now a widely distributed discussion amid the small world of vaccinologists, vaccine researchers and vaccine creators. The man-made nature of the virus (it was not naturally occurring, combined with a man-made mRNA approach to a vaccine as a solution, has resulted in a process that is dangerously undermining the human bodies’ natural immunity process.

Again, bottom line.  The vaccines are likely creating more danger, through mutations, than the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself.

Below are two videos to explain the dynamic at work.  The first video is a recap of Dr. Bossche warning, with a metaphor to put the issue into a context that might be more familiar {Direct Rumble Link} and WATCH:

The second video is the full discussion with Dr. Bossche {Direct Rumble Link}, and the discussion includes what could happen if the vaccines are mandated to the entire world population.  WATCH:

 

  " If Milley and Austin are in, keep your kids out. They need to learn."

 

Article by Kurt Schlichter in Townhall

Send the Incompetent Brass a Message: Don't Enlist

Sometimes they need to learn by pain. There are only two ways we patriots can force our failed military leadership to learn its lesson until 2024, when we get a real president in office who is not bedazzled by medals and impressed by a bunch of guys who had two decades to exterminate a crew of fanatical banditos and failed. We can starve the brass of treasure, but expecting the Republicans to impose that penalty in the wake of the Afghanistan debacle is – to evoke another famous failure of planning and arrogance – a bridge too far. Or we can starve them of blood – our kids’ blood, which for too long has been put at unnecessary risk by unserious military senior leaders consumed by unserious elite fetishes like “white rage” and “climate change” at the same time the Chi Coms are seriously prepping a slaughter of our troops that you can barely conceive of.

Don’t enlist or recommend others enlist, not until there is a real change in the collective mind of the military leadership that indicates that they have learned their lesson. But words cannot be enough – we need to see the same kind of massive convulsion and reform that we saw after the last Democrat/Pentagon betrayal in Vietnam. My generation of officers learned from the guys who rebuilt a ruined military, torn by careerism, lethargy, internal dissension, and the incorporation of society’s low standards in an effort to entice recruits with bribes instead of offering the rigors of service. During the Gulf War, I watched those reformers move a half million Americans (including me and my heavily armed carwash platoon) halfway around the world to the middle of a desert and then sweep an entire national army off the battlefield in 100 hours. But that was 30 years ago. This year, I watched our military bumble our way out of a disaster of our own making, leaving behind our citizens and our credibility while bringing home 13 heroes in metal cases.

The brass, insulated and utterly unaccountable, won’t learn until they see the steady stream of patriots dry up and stop, not because the next generation of warriors is unpatriotic but precisely because they love their country and will sacrifice their dreams of serving her in order to force this desperately-needed change.

We need to go on strike. We need to go on strike against a failed establishment that concerns itself with trendy nonsense, fails in spectacular fashion by making mistakes (like giving up Bagram) that a E1 recruit or a precocious third-grader could anticipate, and that eschews any accountability.

Who has been fired for this fiasco? Well, there was that Marine lieutenant colonel fired for pointing out no one had been held accountable. No one else. Enough. If Milley and Austin are in, keep your kids out. They need to learn. 

The alternative is for our Republican reps to force change by cutting the military budget, which is a disaster in and of itself. But that’s not going to happen anytime soon, despite being one of the rare times the party out of power has some leverage, here by working with progressives who want to cut the budget because they hate the military since it defends America. But, again, that is not going to happen anytime soon – it was hard enough for even a critical mass of our reps in the GOP to get past their forever war mindset. I know how hard it was to stop being a reflexive hawk – I was one of them, and even after two deployments it was still a major 180 to get my head around the idea that maybe we don’t need to be everywhere all the time.

We, the slice of America that supplies the critical mass of the men and women who make up our military, have got to do this ourselves. After all, the military is, largely, us. You don’t see recruiting stations in Beverly Hills – you see them in places the swells don’t go lest they be soiled by contact with those Jesus gun people who like flags and believe there are only two genders. The military is us, and if we go on strike, the brass has to take notice. There aren’t enough gender studies princesses and other cultural detritus to fill the ranks. We need a strike. We need it now, not to destroy the military but to save it.

Now, the strike is already underway from the inside. Those of us vets with a high profile have been inundated with communications from all levels of the military about how morale is at the rock bottom due to the total absence of real leadership at the top. Careerism is rampant. Wokeism has replaced warfighting. And the idiotic vaccine mandate – for a healthy population whose real risks come from suicide and terrorism enabled by inept planning – is going to lead to a flood of trained, experienced troops leaving and taking their training and experience with them. That talent and skill will take years to replace; the generals and admirals have squandered it. 

In the next war with China, if this decline continues, the first day will see a bloodbath that will stagger your imagination. The Chinese are serious. They are not playing, and they have no time for frivolous nonsense about trans soldiers and the scary, scary weather. They will sweep the seas of our ships, wipe out our land installations, and plant their flag over the whole western Pacific.

I am sure, though, that the mainstream media will dutifully pass on the excuses du jour and that it will all be attributed to Trump, patriarchy, and anti-vaxxers.

Don’t play. Don’t sign up. Not until this nonsense stops.

I’m not alone. Vets across the country are recommending that young people put off or forgo service altogether and not be cannon fodder for bemedaled clowns. Brace for the backlash – the trash response will be that we’re unpatriotic, that we hate America. Whatever. We are utterly indifferent to what these incompetents think. They need to go.

This is not what we wanted. We loved the military we served in, and are proud of being a part of it. For decades I recommended enlistment, wholeheartedly and eagerly. I still hear from folks I swore in. So, calling for a strike breaks our hearts. 

Now, there will be some that hear what I say and enlist anyway. To them, I say that I am bursting with pride. We patriots will always support our troops – always. But their current leadership? They need to be overseeing a snow cone operation at some radar station outside Nome, Alaska.

Only a strike has a chance to break this paradigm of failure prior to the inauguration of a new and competent commander in chief. If it does, it is worth it. And the military can come back. It seemed to become a joke overnight because, as a hierarchical organization, the troops do what the commander checks. Our commanders decided their priority was currying favor with their civilian masters and reading Ibram X. Kendi rather than building war-winning forces and reading Sun Tzu. Change the mindset, start checking warfighting capability, and the military will shape up. I just hope it can do it before the Chinese pounce on America.

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2021/09/09/send-the-incompetent-brass-a-message-dont-enlist-n2595526 

Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage

The CDC Suddenly Changes the Definition of ‘Vaccine’ and ‘Vaccination'

Nick Arama reporting for RedState

Matt Margolis over at our sister site PJ Media has picked up on a very interesting change on the CDC website when it comes to the definitions for “vaccine” and “vaccination.”

The timing of the change is very interesting.

He notes that it would appear that the CDC is trying to change how we understand the concept of vaccinations.

He highlights the definition of terms on August 26, 2021.

Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.

Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.

Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.

Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.

That had been their definition since at least May 16, 2018, according to PJ Media.

But then, come September 1, suddenly there was a big change.

Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.

Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.

Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.

Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.

Why are they trying to back off of what the definitions used to be? Now they are talking about a vaccine stimulating the immune response but not to “produce immunity.” Now they’re saying a vaccination doesn’t produce immunity but will “produce protection.”

They appear to be changing the definition to fit what we’re being told about the COVID-19 vaccines — that they don’t necessarily provide immunity but just “protection” from more serious illness. Meanwhile, it fits with the push for more “booster” shots, to keep up the continued “protection.” So they’ve changed the definition of vaccines so that it no longer means preventing the disease or producing immunity. Whereas before it wouldn’t necessarily meet their definition of a vaccine, now it meets the new definition.

We’ve seen the CDC have wrong (bigger) numbers for COVID deaths in Florida (what a coincidence). We’ve seen them falsely claim that the Delta variant is as contagious as chicken pox. Now we see them redefining words to better fit what they’re pushing with the COVID “vaccine.” Is this one more effort to control the narrative?