Friday, September 3, 2021

The Progressive Campaign to Keep White Americans Hating Themselves

Until America regains its moral compass, realizes hate is not an argument, 
and white Americans stop accepting the supposed evils of their whiteness, 
we will all continue to be stuck in our wounds.


Cultures, like people, have a sense of life, which Ayn Rand once characterized as, “an emotional atmosphere created by its dominant philosophy, by its view of man and of existence,” that “represents a culture’s dominant values and serves as a leitmotif of a given age.”

Today, we live in an age of hatred—not only for America, its founders, its documents, and its history, but also for what Progressives contend are the common denominators in those iniquities: white Americans and their very “whiteness.”

Despite more than 60 years of transformative racial reconciliation and redress, the far-Left seeks to change America’s understanding of itself by inflaming racial animus and rolling out a cornucopia of holy causes dressed up as history. From invisible and immeasurable memes of systemic and institutional racism to glib, bumper sticker tropes of white supremacy and white privilege to specious postulations of white fragility, critical race theory, even climate racism—these obsessive hatreds seek to undo civil society as we know it.

The result is a dangerous, neo-Marxist movement that is willing to mobilize racial hatred as a blunt instrument to rally half of America to abandon their principles for hollow, short-term victories while sacrificing the very substantive values they purport to defend. In the end, we are witness to an inverted morality where freedom is used to destroy freedom; equality is used to destroy equality; sexuality is used to destroy sexuality; hate is used to destroy hate; racism is used to destroy racism.

To this end, Ibram X. Kendi, author of How to be an Antiracist and director of Boston University’s Center for Antiracist Research, openly asserts, “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.”

More troubling than Kendi’s radical-chic activism, weighing in at $20,000 per hour for virtual presentations, is the Progressive movement’s most unexpected ally—white Americans hating themselves and other white Americans precisely for being white.

Consider Robert Jensen, author of The Heart of Whiteness: Confronting Race, Racism and White Privilege and an early proponent and practitioner of white self-loathing: “So, I hate myself, which is appropriate. . . . We should hate whiteness and be accountable for our own complicity with whiteness. . . . Whiteness is depraved and degraded. To accept whiteness . . . is to deform oneself.” Accordingly, to Jensen, white America must face the inescapable conclusion: “Whiteness—the whole constellation of practices, beliefs, attitudes, emotions that are mixed up with being white—is the problem. . . . The real White People’s Burden is to civilize ourselves.”

HBO comedian Bill Maher sees the phenomenon from a different perspective: “Lifting up those who society has cheated or forsaken, that’s liberalism. Hating all things white is just tedious virtue signaling.” Maher’s solution is a purely capitalist one—if white progressives “really feel this bad about the whole race thing . . . let’s tax whiteness. . . . We’ll do it like carbon offsets. We’ll calculate your exact level of white blameness [sic],” and “come up with just the right dollar figure to offset the exact amount of you being a f—ing loser.”

As for guilt-ridden white suburban housewives and Hollywood celebrities such as Rosanna Arquette—“I’m sorry I was born white and privileged. It disgusts me and I feel so much shame.”—Maher opines, “Do you think it’s hard being a black man in a white man’s world? Try being a white woman who feels bad about you being a black man in a white man’s world.”

Similarly, BET founder Robert Johnson says whites who tear down statues, cancel TV shows, and fire unwoke professors “have the mistaken assumption that black people are sitting around cheering for them saying, ‘Oh, my God, look at these white people—they’re doing something so important to us.’” In reality, Johnson says, “black people laugh at white people who do this. . . .” And “the notion that a celebrity could get on a Twitter feed and say, ‘Oh, my God, I’m so sorry that I’m white’—that, to me, is the silliest expression of white privilege that exists in this country,” the thought being, “I gotta do something for the Negroes to make them feel better. . . . It’s tantamount to rearranging the deck chairs on a racial Titanic. It absolutely means nothing.”

Ultimately, to hate oneself and to align that hate with a divisive and often violent racial movement is a powerful and dangerous unifying agent. It lures those harboring fanatical grievance away from themselves and offers them a commonality of meaning and purpose—to a cause and to their lives. Today’s progressive crusade has exploited these hatreds to form alliances, kinships, and consensuses—not only with like-minded people, but also a compliant media, corporations, and academia—all in the hope of shepherding forth a social and racial revolution deemed inevitable and necessary for some ill-defined “restorative justice.” One can only wonder about the fate of dissidents and “oppressors” inside their new American Marxist utopia.

Consequently, Americans of all stripes feel our society is unraveling before our eyes because we have lost our common culture and our common values. E pluribus unum is little more than an anachronistic slogan—a vestige of a dark time that belongs on the scrap heap of history like so many toppled statues of our now-disgraced forebears.

Until America regains its moral compass, realizes hate is not an argument, and white Americans stop accepting the supposed evils of their whiteness, we will all continue to be stuck in our wounds.


X22, SGT Report, and more-Sept 3rd

 




Made it through another week, everyone! Here's tonight's news:


Something Missing


Just a short note of something rather insignificant in the grand scheme of things….

We are told by the powers that be – that approximately 6,000 to 7,000 American citizens were rescued by daring efforts of the U.S. State Department and U.S. military in evacuations from Kabul airport.  Okay, fair enough… that’s a good outcome.  Happy to hear it; we can debate the other 116,000 at a later time.

However, it seems a little odd now that there’s no videos of the survivors of the Afghan crisis arriving at airports.   No crowds or families greeting the extracted American residents; no human interest stories and local broadcasted news coverage of relieved Americans, husbands, wives, daughters or sons arriving back in their hometown…. nothing.

Six to seven thousand Americans saved from the clutches of the Taliban, and not a single story of those Americans arriving home to the waiting arms of their loving family.

Just weird.

Carry on.


A Disturbance in the Force

By focusing too much on Joe Biden and his bad decisions during the withdrawal, the politicians, generals, and experts responsible for these preliminary failures are let off the hook.


From the moment he was nominated until the last few weeks, the media carried a lot of water for Joe Biden. In spite of his apparent lack of energy or brains, we were regaled with tales of his experience, good judgment, and, above all, his empathy

America was back. The adults were now in charge. No more “mean tweets.” Biden’s presidency would be a time of competence and compassion. 

Reality Has a Vote

When Biden blew past the May 1 deadline to withdraw from Afghanistan, there was little national discussion. When signs of an imminent Taliban victory appeared by mid-summer, he assured the country the withdrawal would go smoothly and scoffed at the idea we might see “the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country.” 

At that time, there was minor grumbling about the decision to withdraw, but there was not a big media push to oppose it. Perhaps, the future Raytheon executives (i.e., the generals) assumed Afghanistan would go like Syria and Iraq, a withdrawal-in-name-only, with a paramilitarized embassy and an army of contractors left behind to continue the war effort.

Then it all went to hell. 

Biden’s recent claim that the Afghan evacuation was all a well-planned effort or a victory for humanitarianism appeared, at best, to be a post hoc rationalization. There was no way to reconcile the swift collapse of the Afghan government and the hordes of refugees crowding the Kabul airport with his optimistic speech made only six weeks ago. His simultaneous blame of Trump for the withdrawal deal and praise of himself for how well it was conducted did not make a lot of sense.

Now, almost all of Biden’s sources of support have turned on him. The press has been the most aggressive, finally noticing his incorrect prognostications, apparent dementia, as well as his tendency towards snapping and prickliness.

A Struggle Within the Ruling Class

Under ordinary circumstances, renewed scrutiny from the press might signal a return to normal accountability. But we should not be deceived; this is not the start of a new era. Rather, this signals a temporary, internal dispute among factions of the ruling class. 

On one side is the Obama cohort, from whom Biden obtains most of his support. Obama was something of a realist and preferred (at least in his first term) to reduce foreign policy commitments. He famously withdrew our forces from Iraq. This only changed in his second term, when he was persuaded to pursue campaigns in Syria and Libya. This faction still supports Biden.

On the other side of the ruling class are the humanitarian interventionists. For them, war is best when it serves no national interest, showcasing our purity. This group is made up of the Clinton gang mostly, along with neoconservatives and uniformed military allies of convenience. It also includes the “duty to protect” crowd, which made up a large part of the State Department during Hillary Clinton’s watch. 

They engineered the Libya and Syria debacles and have never seen a war from which they would like to withdraw. Many fellow travelers are found among the media, and they may not let up when this blows over. 

There is a way forward for them. While witless and unpopular, Kamala Harris is decidedly in the Clinton camp and has done her best to avoid being associated with the small and large embarrassments of the Afghanistan withdrawal and evacuation. 

Finally, there are the Republican establishment types. Junior partners in the ruling class at best, some superficially endorsed an America First policy during the Trump years, but many more were critical of Trump’s efforts to reduce our military presence in the Middle East and elsewhere. Republicans are now pouncing on Biden mostly for partisan reasons, often contradicting their earlier support for the planned withdrawal from the never-ending Afghanistan war. 

Republican criticisms have an incoherent, saccharine quality. While all are taking pot shots at the rushed withdrawal and the bad optics of the Taliban victory, Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) and others are stressing the fate of the translators and the Afghans in general, echoing the Bush-era rhetoric of liberation and open borders. Even Trump himself has gotten in on the act and sounds like a born-again neoconservative

Perhaps this grandstanding is meant merely to diminish Biden—pure partisan spite. But the maudlin talk about the poor Afghans suggests that Republicans do not have a vocabulary with which to think about foreign policy, even though Trump showed the way in 2016 with his America First rhetoric. 

Republicans have gone back to “fight them over there, so we don’t have to fight them over here.” They are insufficiently attentive to the fact that we just brought over 100,000 unvetted Afghans into our homeland after fighting them over there.

Failure, the Orphan

The endless dissection of the withdrawal distracts from the bigger scandal of the Afghanistan campaign. This war itself was a bipartisan failure. The problems did not begin in 2021. The chaos of the last few weeks simply manifested the types of problems that always plagued the campaign: flawed strategy, excessive reliance on unreliable proxies, unpopular promotion of western political and social attitudes, and massive amounts of waste, fraud, and abuse. 

The reliance problem first showed itself in the failure to capture Bin Laden at Tora Bora. Twenty years later, the ease of the Taliban takeover revealed our total confusion about the human terrain in Afghanistan, including the unpopularity of the programs we were promoting and the rulers we supported. Finally, the swift collapse of the Afghan security forces was a testament to how trillions of dollars can be spent to accomplish nothing, while making contractors (and select locals) filthy rich. 

While there was some candor behind closed doors, the deep state and the national security “blob” continued along the same path for two decades and spent a lot of its energy concealing the real state of affairs from the American people. No one is being held accountable for this stunning waste of money, lives, and time, other than one brave lieutenant colonel who spoke out about the hypocrisy. Similar wars in Iraq, Libya, and Syria all had the same flaws, and all of them ended in smaller-scale failures and excuse-making.

In addition to the infighting among elected officials, different parts of the managerial class are pointing their fingers at one another, with the state department, the military, and the intelligence community all deflecting blame. This blame-shifting obscures the fact that there is one American state. Each of these groups are simply departments within it. Back when it could have done some good, none of the departments was sounding the alarm on the failures of the others. Rather, each supported, lied, and covered up the problems in Afghanistan for two decades. 

By focusing too much on Biden and his bad decisions during the withdrawal, the politicians, generals, and experts responsible for these preliminary failures are let off the hook. It is an alibi and a distraction, which does not point the way forward.

The deep state is the problem. The Republicans and the Democrats are the problem. As Trump recognized in 2016, the problem is the swamp. 

The Forgotten

In the Soviet Union, the double catastrophes of Chernobyl and its ignominious withdrawal from Afghanistan had much to do with the ultimate collapse of the regime. The two events in rapid succession called into question the Communist elite’s claims of competence, which was the foundation of their legitimacy.

In the emerging national states of the dissolving Soviet Union, Afghanistan veterans loomed large. They were men with the right combination of military experience and alienation from the ruling class. They formed the cadres around which citizens organized and resisted the central government. 

Approximately 800,000 Americans served in Afghanistan. Another 2 million or so served in Iraq. While these wars were not victories, they did serve to train and anneal these men. These experiences also served to disillusion them from the myth of governmental competence and good will. It would be hard for any honest person to participate in either campaign and think we have a good government run by wise people concerned about the future of our country. 

With the ruling class and the various arms of the government engaged in recriminations and stricken by temporary disunity, such men would be a useful foundation for a genuine movement to bring down our own corrupt, incompetent, and venal ruling class. The veterans of the “forever wars” have the knowledge and the skills and the anger.

Hard times call for hard men. 


How To Have A Normal, Friendly Conversation: A Guide For Race-Obsessed White Leftists



The New York Times recently introduced a monthly advice column wherein a woman named Jenée Desmond-Harris answers questions by white leftists racked with anxiety about being white and interacting with minorities.

It’s truly a case study in how delusional, narcissistic, and anti-social the mind of the modern left really is

This month’s column is headlined, “How Should I Respond to Creepy Questions About My Friend’s Race?” and the submission is centered on the troubles of a white lady who doesn’t know what to do when white men inquire about her female friend, who is of Asian descent.

“On several occasions,” wrote the poor woman, “I’ve been at a bar or party with an Asian-American friend and when my friend is getting a drink or off to the bathroom, a man (it’s always a man) will ask me, ‘Where is she from’ or ‘What type of Asian is she?'”

You can almost see her sweating now, unsure whether to lecture the offending party or start flipping over tables.

“I really don’t know how to deal with this situation productively as an ally,” she continued. “I usually don’t mention it to my friend both because I feel it’s my responsibility to deal with it and because we’ll probably never see the offending person again.”

Note that “as an ally,” this white leftist carries the weight of the world on her shoulders in such high-stakes moments. This is her responsibility and she desperately needs answers.

“How should I handle these sorts of perpetual-foreigner questions?” she asked. “Should I tell my friend when it happens?”

If you aren’t suspended in awe by this scenario all too common for white leftists, the advice Desmond-Harris offers should really get your gears turning.

Desmond-Harris answers the reader by first explaining that the men asking about her friend are “at least to some extent fetishizing your friend’s ethnicity,” suffering from a thing called “yellow fever.”

She advises the reader to “find out how your friend sees these kinds of questions,” but cautions her not to “act as if you’re breaking news when you share what’s been happening.” She further suggests asking the friend if a response to the curious men along the lines of, “My friend doesn’t like it when guys fixate on her ethnicity, so I’m not going to talk about it with you” would be sufficient.

None of this is a joke. This reader question and the accompanying advice actually appeared in our country’s most important newspaper. And that helpful tip from Desmond-Harris is precisely why the left is so anti-social. They don’t know how to have normal encounters because everything to them is a fight, usually over race or gender or sexual identity or some other trivial matter.

Here’s some real advice for people like this fraught white woman: Your friend is probably attractive and that’s why men are curious about her. If you’re the ugly friend, don’t take the overtures as opportunities to quash the potential for love. Nobody likes a cock block.

Instead, consider telling the men that they should ask your friend about her background themselves. Or perhaps simply tell them that she’s from whatever American city but that her past relatives immigrated from whatever Asiatic country. When your friend returns, let her know that you and the gentleman were just discussing her upbringing. Everyone likes talking about themselves to some degree. This is called socializing.

One last piece of advice for white leftists: Relax. It’s not your job to rescue your minority friends from people who find them interesting.


9 Great Career Options For Laid-Off Abortion Doctors In Texas



With Texas's abortion law stopping many abortions in the state, a lot of abortion doctors are going to be out of work. Luckily, this is still the United States of America, even though you can't kill your baby after six weeks in Texas anymore. Abortion doctors should consider one of these nine alternate career choices: 

1. Axe murderer - Abortion doctors are well-prepared for this kind of thing. They won't even have to wash the blood off their hands to get started!

2. Learn to code - There are lots of free resources for learning to program software!

3. Become a hitman - Shave your head, get a suit, and start working for the mob.

4. Move to China where you can perform abortions with impunity - China will welcome you with open arms, as they kill babies just for being the wrong gender.

5. Puppy abortion doctor - The skills are very transferrable.

6. Build a candy shop in the woods and lure children in to eat them - It's the same moral principle, except you're killing fewer kids per day.

7. Collect the Infinity Stones and snap your fingers to wipe out all the babies - MUAHAHAHAHA!

8. Build some solar panels - Plenty of opportunities here.

9. Repent of your sins, trust in Christ for forgiveness, and do something productive with your life instead of killing babies. - Do it. Now.

Here's to a new career and second chances! Go get 'em tiger!


Our Defeat In Afghanistan Is Only The Beginning

As the post-9/11 chapter closes, a new one begins, marked above all by the end of American deterrence and the eclipse of American power.



Our total defeat and ignominious, disastrous withdrawal in Afghanistan, after 20 years of war and nation-building, closes a chapter on post-9/11 America — and opens another.

What comes next is to some extent uncertain, but you don’t need to be a grand strategist to see the broad outlines of what is already taking shape.

First and most obvious, Afghanistan will revert to being a terrorist haven. The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, by its very nature, will not keep to itself, the erstwhile assurances of Taliban officials notwithstanding. Every committed jihadist on earth who can get to Afghanistan is headed that way now or making plans to do so.

Our military leaders have already admitted as much. Two weeks ago, well before the suicide bombing attacks that took the lives of 13 American soldiers and scores of Afghans, the Pentagon told U.S. senators that the collapse of the Afghan government and the Taliban takeover means terrorist groups will reconstitute in Afghanistan more quickly than was previously estimated.

On an August 15 phone call with top Biden officials and senators from both parties, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley said the previous assessment, back in June, was that there was a “medium” risk that terrorist groups would form in Afghanistan within two years of the U.S. withdrawal. Asked if he believed that timeline would have to be moved up in light of recent events, Milley reportedly responded, “Yes.”

In practical terms, this means in the years to come we’re almost certainly going to see a resurgence of Islamist terrorism worldwide, and likely another attack on American soil. Why? Because for al-Qaeda, and for jihadists the world over, the Taliban’s victory in Afghanistan is a vindication of 9/11, a strategic victory. After 20 hard years, they won and we lost. 

Osama bin Laden predicted something like this would happen. Not long after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, bin Laden issued a “letter to the American people,” in which he declared that, like the Soviet invasion of an earlier generation, the Americans would eventually leave in defeat:

If the Americans refuse to listen to our advice and the goodness, guidance and righteousness that we call them to, then be aware that you will lose this Crusade Bush began, just like the other previous Crusades in which you were humiliated by the hands of the Mujahideen, fleeing to your home in great silence and disgrace. If the Americans do not respond, then their fate will be that of the Soviets who fled from Afghanistan to deal with their military defeat, political breakup, ideological downfall, and economic bankruptcy.

Bin Laden and those who planned 9/11 recognized the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan for the strategic error it has proven to be. All of them understood the collapse of the Soviet Union as a direct consequence of the USSR’s failed invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and credited the mujahadeen with the collapse of the communist superpower. It might take time, they thought, but the same would happen to the United States should it be foolish and arrogant enough to invade and occupy the country. And we were.

For all that, a Soviet-style collapse of the U.S. won’t happen. But our humiliation in Afghanistan will have global reverberations. The military power of the United States was the last institution of public life Americans really trusted, and it was the foundation of other nations’ trust in us — or fear of us.

Our adversaries will react accordingly. China, above all, will understand our defeat in Afghanistan as the end of American deterrence and a chance to press its irredentist agenda in Taiwan and the South China Sea. Moscow and Tehran will come to similar conclusions, as will Pyongyang.

Indeed, over the weekend, the Wall Street Journal reported that North Korea has resumed operation of its plutonium-producing reactor at Yongbyon, which had been inactive since December 2018. The operation of the reactor has apparently coincided with signs that North Korea has also begun to separate plutonium from spent fuel previously removed from the reactor.

For our allies, the end of American deterrence will likely prompt a strategic recalibration. Why would Taiwan, which this week issued a dire warning that China’s armed forces could “paralyze” Taiwan’s defenses, put its faith in an alliance with the United States? Why would Ukraine or Poland?

As we learn more in the coming weeks and months about the fecklessness and deceit of the Biden administration’s Afghanistan withdrawal — including Biden’s appalling conversation with then-President Ashraf Ghani, urging him to “project a different picture” of the fight against the Taliban, “whether it is true or not” — every nation in the world will take note of what our promises are worth.

Some of these developments will take decades to mature, but others will move rapidly. By the end of Biden’s term, assuming he’s able to see it through, we might well long for the days when all we had to worry about was our humiliation in Afghanistan. We’ll certainly come to see the events of the past few weeks in a stark new light: as the beginning of a dark chapter in world history, marked above all by the eclipse of American power and influence in an increasingly dangerous world.


A Rebel in Dallas Throws Sand in The Machine


A free-range citizen made it through the filtration process and appeared on livestream before the Dallas City Council.  His rigorous advocacy for the totalitarian mandates and forced vaccines was welcome amid the tribe…. until he started helping them a little too much.  WATCH:


White House Occupant Sees Horrible Plummeting Approval Amid Nation Suffering The Consequences of His Installation


Polls are generally worthless; media polls even more so.  However, when the ultra far-left NPR produces a manipulated poll that can only get Joe Biden a 43% approval rating, you know things are bad… horrible for the White House occupant. [Polling Data Here]

The latest NPR/Marist poll shows Joe Biden with a 43% approval overall, and that’s with a proclaimed 85% of Democrats still sticking with him {insert eyeroll here}.   64% of Independents disapprove of Biden’s job performance and 95% of Republicans disapprove.

The polling was D+7 [pdf here] to achieve an overall 43% approval rating.

In related news perhaps Joe Biden will be campaigning for Liz Cheney.


The White House Hopes We Can All Forget Afghanistan (And The Press Will Help)

 


Baghdad Bob in his new role as WH propagandist


Article by Christopher Bedford in The Federalist


The White House Hopes We Can All Forget Afghanistan (And The Press Will Help)

The right people want to see this administration get back to the things they elected them to do -- and so they're going to. It's as simple as that.
 

“Look, we’ve closed the chapter on Afghanistan. And now we’re committed to America. We want to put the past behind us and are committed to build back better and infrastructure.”

“We want to focus on people, on jobs, on working-class Americans struggling to pay the bills.”

“We’re not dwelling on the past.”

None of these are quotes — yet. Already by the time you read this, that might have changed.

Because even while the frantic Kabul evacuation effort was ongoing the White House preferred to talk about anything at all other than their deadly and disastrous retreat. And we all heard Tuesday afternoon’s angry, 20-minute speech by the president: The retreat was a great success, a real Joe-Eagle example of this administration keeping its promises — and it’s all the fault of that dastardly Donald Trump and the cowardly Afghan government.

The White House will face some obstacles in changing the narrative. This, for instance, is the first story since Super Tuesday that’s seen a largely complicit corporate media really go after the administration for any of its numerous and demonstrable failures.

It’s the first story that’s seen the same corporate media that virtually propped up now-President Joe Biden’s limp and barely responsive person begin to wonder aloud if his public mental decay might be a sign of — shock — mental decay.

Finally, there are still hundreds of Americans and many more American-aligned Afghans stranded in the country — and likely hostages of a vengeful and merciless foe.

But in the end, there’s a high chance it will work.

Why? Let’s start with ability: The White House Press Corps, for instance, is largely made up of camera-ready vanity projects more interested in their Instagram followers and TV outfits than holding to account an administration they’re politically aligned with.

The brief glimpses the public was treated to over the past two weeks of, say, the Pentagon reporters asking real questions and demanding answers might have been an impetus to improve if the average pretty face at the White House had either the shame or the ability to do so. But they don’t, and they won’t.

Can’t be too hard on the White House press corps, though, they’re just doing their jobs, and despite what they might claim, for most that job is really just looking good on TV, making friends, and, when the cameras were rolling, yelling at Trump while he colored Easter eggs with little kids.

In reality, a lot of people in Washington and New York are just doing their jobs. Take the average news anchor — first in line to defend the tenacity of her journalism, to trumpet the sacred nature of his career. Their job isn’t easy — they have to read off a teleprompter for hours on end in between questioning random faces popping up on a screen for two minutes at a time — but it’s not exactly shoe-leather journalism.

Can’t be too hard on them, either: They’re far from the only ones. What do you think is going to happen to the editors of The New York Times if the Biden loyalists who make up their readership think they’ve focused a bit too long on those American hostages in Afghanistan? What do you think is going to happen if a Republican is elected because of it? We know what happened last time they felt responsible: A lot of long public confessions; a lot of tears; a lot of feelings.

Readers aside, it wouldn’t sit too well with the reporters editors answer to these days either. Those reporters, after all, have friendships to maintain, and above and beyond that, self-worth to uphold. When you don’t have religion, your status in the Resistance is nearly as crucial as your sexual identity in assessing your self-worth. What will your wife’s boyfriend think of you?

Laughs aside, this isn’t a joke: The American corporate press isn’t broken in the normal sense, it’s simply and grotesquely changed: It isn’t seeking truth, but views and clicks and, above even that, approval from the right people.

Those right people, in corporate media and elsewhere, want to see this administration get back to the things they elected them to do — and so they’re going to, and it’s as simple as that. The White House is so confident in this, they’ve already laid out their plan to Politico.

“The path forward for them in the fall remains Covid and infrastructure,” a chosen outside source explained. “The most important facts about Afghanistan remain that he got the U.S. out, in terms of what the public cares about.”

The administration — and its media friends — are going to do their best to make sure that happens. Nevermind the hundreds of Americans confirmed left behind. It’s essentially their own fault: you heard the president say it. And if the Taliban doesn’t start filming beheadings, it might even stay as quiet as the White House hopes.

When the Vietnam War ended, America was desperate to move on. The tumult at home, the dead abroad, the first real defeat in American history — all weighed on us, but rather than confront why we fought, how we fought — or even any of the people responsible for so much death and turmoil — we chose to forget.

There were casualties in this. The returning American G.I. was left alone and forsaken. Just as the military veteran suicide hotlines have been flooded these past two weeks, these men struggled desperately for closure and meaning in a country that seemed hellbent on denying them any.

Even more than those who came home, those who flew home to be buried or were left behind in rice paddies were forsaken by an America that chose willfully to forget. These men had answered, but back at home when we heard the call to simply clear our eyes, learn from our mistakes, and honor their sacrifice as we moved forward, we instead let its sound linger for decades.

We’d rather make movies about what a waste it all was; we called that real. And we made sure to thank every veteran who returned from Iraq and Afghanistan. How nice. If we really want to thank them, we’ll answer some hard questions.

Alex Plitsas is a decorated Army combat and intelligence veteran who, as a civilian in the final days of evacuation, worked day and night to help get as many Americans and green-card holders out of that country as he could. “This,” he wrote Monday, “is the question I keep getting from those who remain stranded in Afghanistan, ‘What’s next?'”

Sadly, we know what they want to come next.

“Look, we’ve closed the chapter on Afghanistan. And now we’re committed to America. We want to put the past behind us and are committed to build back better and infrastructure.”

“We want to focus on people, on jobs, on working-class Americans struggling to pay the bills.”

“We’re not dwelling on the past.”

They’ll almost sound patriotic.

 

https://thefederalist.com/2021/09/01/the-white-house-hopes-we-can-all-forget-afghanistan-and-the-press-will-help/ 



Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage