Friday, August 13, 2021

Taliban Now Control Majority of Afghanistan, Kabul Likely to Fall in Days –

State Dept. Evacuating U.S. Embassy

The Taliban in Afghanistan have been taking back territory and attacking U.S. allied forces ever since the U.S. military began a withdrawal. On July 8th Joe Biden was asked if the U.S. embassy in Kabul would be evacuated giving a familiar reference to the U.S. collapse in Vietnam.  In July he said no.  Biden was leaving 650 military personnel in Kabul to guard the embassy and diplomats.

Two days ago Biden announced sending 3,000 U.S. troops to begin the embassy evacuation. That is correct.  Biden is sending 3,000 soldiers back to Afghanistan to help evacuate Americans. Another 3,500 soldiers will be on standby. Biden is sending more soldiers back to Afghanistan than the 2,500 he withdrew to begin with.

Considering that Joe Biden has a documented political history of getting everything exactly wrong; meaning the outcomes are exactly the opposite of every contention he has ever made; it is worth noting what Biden claims will not happen – because this is exactly what is likely to happen.  WATCH:


As if on cue from divine or karmic providence, exactly what Joe Biden said in July would not occur, is exactly what is occurring in August….  Afghanistan’s second and third largest cities, Kandahar and Herat, fell to the Taliban on Thursday and Friday.

(CNN) – […] In a statement Friday, the Taliban said they had taken control of the governor’s office, police headquarters, as well as other key operational centers throughout the city of Kandahar. “Hundreds of weapons, vehicles and ammunition were seized,” the Taliban statement said.

Kamin said he and many others had made their way to a military base close to the city’s international airport and were awaiting a flight out. “Many (government) soldiers surrendered and the rest fled,” Kamin said.

Kamin had earlier told CNN that Taliban fighters had been able to break through the city’s frontline and were engaging in sporadic confrontation with government forces.

Kandahar, which lies on the junction of three major highways, is of particular strategic importance and was formerly a major hub for US military operations. Its seizure marks the most significant gain yet for the Taliban.

Elsewhere on Friday, the government lost control of the nearby capital of Urozgan province, Tarin Kot. (read more)

Biden announced the withdrawal of 2,500 troops in April.

In June and July those troops started leaving.

In July Biden swears the embassy in Kabul will not fall.

In August Biden sends 3,000 troops back to Afghanistan.

Watch what happens in Kabul….

We will see helicopters emergency airlifting embassy personnel and rescuing people.

And somehow this is all going to be Trump’s fault.



SGT Report and Stew Peters Show-August 13

 



Evening folks. Here's tonight's lineup of news from the 'good guys side' (X22 doesn't often post on Friday, so if there's nothing from them by now, probably stuck waiting until Sunday.)

The Biden Administration’s Extremism Is Fuel For Domestic Unrest

Establishment gaslighting and threats from the Biden regime’s increasingly
 unhinged national security surrogates is itself becoming a radicalizing agent.



Recently, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki announced the White House is working with various social media companies to flag and remove alleged COVID-19 misinformation. Psaki went so far as to suggest that if distributors of “misinformation”—as defined by the administration—were censored from one platform, they should be censored from all platforms. The Biden regime is getting serious about removing your access to the public square—all for your safety and security.

Likewise, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and their big-tech enablers are on the hunt for domestic extremists and general all-around infidels from the church of neo-Marxist globalism. So far they’ve had a fairly easy go of it, rounding up the January 6 protesters, deplatforming the distributors of so-called extremist misinformation, and blacklisting individual citizens who publicly speak against the Biden regime’s ideologies. All of this was made easy because the offending citizens, thinking they had constitutional rights, used digital platforms to challenge questionable claims from our ruling elites, their duplicitous medical “experts,” and the courtesans in the White House and Congress.

Just so we’re on the same sheet of music, because there’s a bunch of protesters sitting in solitary in a DC jail who didn’t get the message: The government is using the social media postings and digital communications of American citizens to target them for speaking against the establishment.

You are now the target of the enormous and deadly mass surveillance and security state you voted for back when you couldn’t have imagined that neo-Marxist elites would gain control of the government. Consider using digital countermeasures to protect yourself. For pointers, see herehere, and here.

Blacklisting for Sport and Profit

Last week, PayPal announced it is partnering with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to investigate and close accounts the ADL has deemed as belonging to extremists. In February, PayPal had already begun closing accounts flagged by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) for allegedly being associated with “extremists” and “hate” groups. This is the same SPLC that runs a giant hate-grift that funnels donations to private Cayman Islands accounts and blacklists conservative organizations like the Family Research Council and media personalities like Tucker Carlson.

It appears PayPal is setting up a blacklist to deny banking and commercial payment services to individuals and businesses that fall outside woke culture. In an essay by PayPal co-founder David Sacks on Bari Weiss’s Substack, Sacks details the dangers of financial institutions blacklisting businesses and individuals who have been labeled as “extremist” by unaccountable and often partisan private organizations, like the ADL and SPLC. In Sacks’s foreboding words, “Silenced voices and empty stomachs are fuel for the very extremism you claim to oppose.”

In the digital public square, giants such as Facebook, Twitter, and Google have begun working with The Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT) to identify and remove what they consider extremist online content. Since 2017, the GIFCT has served as a private database of extremist and terrorist online content.

Like many of the post-9/11 NGOs that monitored online terrorist activity, GIFCT started out documenting content created by, or supportive of, al-Qaeda, ISIS, and the Taliban. The GIFCT is now shifting its focus to U.S. domestic extremists and white supremacists—as identified by activist groups like the SPLC. GIFCT is also working with Amazon, Dropbox, Mailchimp, and LinkedIn, to name just a few. What could possibly go wrong here?

Hanlon’s Razor

Those in Washington, DC, whether at the White House or the Capitol building, continuously bombard Americans with scary talk about domestic terrorism and extremism, as if we were living in 2006 Iraq. Last month the White House even unveiled a new domestic counterterrorism strategy to deal with this epidemic of uncooperative subjects. However, these “experts” in DC seem to have forgotten one of the maxims of counterterrorism strategy: Counterterrorism strategy should not produce more terrorism than existed before the strategy was implemented.

Calling the 1/6 non-surrection an attack worse than 9/11 is idiotic. The vast majority of those arrested are charged with misdemeanors yet rotting in jail for months under extreme conditions.

Placing hundreds of sad-sack Trump supporters in pre-trial solitary confinement for misdemeanor trespassing charges, denying access to exculpatory evidence, then delaying their show trials for 12-24 months is not exactly what the Founders had in mind when they ratified the Bill of Rights that contains the Sixth Amendment guarantee to a speedy trial and the ability to face your accuser and the evidence against you. I’m sure the DC judges and federal prosecutors got a good chuckle out of their manipulation of habeus corpus, but we see what they did there.

The FBI instigating and amplifying terror plots, which allows them to ride to the rescue, bag some promotions, justify their enormous budget, and provide their political benefactors scary stories to frighten the public—well, we see that too. Like with arsonist firefighters, however, if you start the fire, it doesn’t count.

Establishment gaslighting and threatening wonky-talk from the Biden regime’s increasingly unhinged national security surrogates is itself becoming a radicalizing agent across much of America. But to the likes of Biden’s Domestic Policy Advisor Susan Rice, is that a bug or a feature?

Hanlon’s Razor states to never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity, and Rice has a long tradition of, well, flawed judgement. Perhaps there is more at play here than Hanlon can account for.

Afraid of Americans

Our national security apparatus—namely, the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, their partners in law enforcement, the U.S. Postal Service (again, why?) and big tech—are busy monitoring social media looking for the next III% patch-wearing dupe they can peg as a dangerous Hawaiian shirt-clad terrorist. This seems like a waste of time.

I doubt a real terrorist is going to publicize his evil plots or conduct operational planning on Instagram or Facebook Messenger. As we plainly saw with the Gov. Gretchen Witmer faux-kidnapping plot, most people on social media talking about violence are LARPers, foreign influence operations, and government informants.

I’m not saying there are not dangerous men and women in America. Absolutely there are. After all, America was founded and made the world’s greatest superpower through the sacrifice of dangerous men and women, but modern versions of these dangerous men and women aren’t on social media jabbering about violence or overthrowing the government.

These dangerous men and women have jobs, they have families to support and mortgages to pay. They’re focused on trying to pay for their kid’s braces or college tuition while keeping an increasingly woke and hostile mob at bay.

They are hard men and women, many of them combat veterans, who are not afraid to do what it takes to protect what is theirs. More importantly, they are not a threat—unless someone makes them one.

The establishment elites are now moving to do exactly that by depriving Americans of their employment, access to financial services, free speech, liberty, and their way of life. You won’t hear these dangerous men and women whining about it or talking tough on social media, but rest assured, they see what these elites are doing.

Targeting Political Opponents

In this country of 330 million people, actual political violence is a statistical anomaly. There just isn’t enough white supremacy or extremist activity to justify the entire bloated domestic terrorism industry of Joint Terrorism Task Forces, Fusion Centers, and “Countering Violent Extremism” NGO contracts. In post-9/11 fear, we incentivized a national security apparatus that now sees traditional Americans as the greatest threat to establishment power—and that’s a problem.

Our national security apparatus desperately needs a threat to justify its existence. The Biden administration has promised them one: dissident America.

Corporate media and various Biden regime surrogates are openly discussing making second-class citizens of the vaccine wary, effectively establishing a medical caste system. Companies are putting on unemployment lines people who won’t take an experimental medical therapy. Others are advocating vaccine mandates for employmentgovernment benefits, and medical care. All while government, corporations, and nonprofits are working to remove citizens’ access to financial, e-commerce, and internet services because of their political beliefs.

If one wanted to create a particularly ferocious enemy out of a normally respectful and amenable segment of the population—an enemy that would aggressively fight back in response to maltreatment, thus providing a pretext for all manner of draconian security measures, budget increases, and “emergency” powers, I can think of no better way than to make them hungry, broke, powerless, and persecuted second-class citizens. One might label this method intentional radicalization.

Radicalization. Sometimes it’s more than just a word. Sometimes, for the tyrant, it’s a strategy.


Holland Awards Pride Picture For Being ICONIC

 The Post Millennial


A photo from a Pride event in Holland won an award for being "iconic" and the "most aesthetic." It shows a a small child smiling while surrounded by men in bondage gear. The men, in harnesses and shiny black hot pants, are gathered outdoors on a porch where a little girl plays with a swing set.

The Post Millennial's Andy Ngo shared the photo, saying that a "woman claiming to be the girl's mother" had "opened her home for the men to change." The photo is called "Celebrating Diversity," and was snapped by Jan van Breda.

In selecting van Breda's photo, the jury stated that "This photo, in its composition - child in the foreground, men preparing for Canal Parade in the background, everyone busy with their own activities and fascinations - sublimely depicts what will hopefully remain self-evident: that we, unhampered by prejudices , and almost unsuspectingly, all may and can exist side by side."

What do you think of the photo?
Should children be exposed to adult fetish behaviours?
A local councilwoman endorsed the photos and proudly stated men like this should be able to marry in the church. Do you agree?

Shocking New Study Blows Away the…

 Shocking New Study Blows Away the Narrative That Vaccine Hesitancy Is for the Uneducated

AP Photo/Marta Lavandier

Watching the media and viewing online forums, you’d assume the group of people with the most hesitancy to get the vaccine would be the uneducated or even conspiracy theorists who think they’re injecting 5G magnets into the arm so the government can track you.

You’ll be surprised to find that this isn’t the case.

While people with low levels of education are still high on the charts for refusing to get the vaccine, it’s the people with the highest education levels that comprise the largest group of those who are vaccine-hesitant.

According to a study by Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburg, 20.8 percent of the population with a high school level of education or less aren’t too keen on getting the vaccine. The group with some college has 18.3 percent of their group holding back. The numbers continue to dwindle to those with master’s degrees, but begin to rise again on the education level.

The group with Ph.D.’s shows that 23.9 percent of people are hesitant to get the vaccine.



One has to wonder why the most educated people in America aren’t too keen on getting the vaccine being pushed so hard by “educated” circles. To be sure, there’s more information to be gleaned here. According to the study, reasons for refusal to get the vaccine are wide-ranging, be they political beliefs to health concerns.

Where many of those with high levels of education stand on the matter weren’t covered and more information is needed before actual conclusions can be drawn.

Regardless, this is very surprising information. The popular narrative in our society is that those who are refusing the vaccine are only doing so for foolish reasons. Vaccine hesitancy is often associated with conspiracy theorists or stupid people, but it would appear this is far from the truth. The higher in education level you go, the more hesitancy you’ll find.

Interestingly, according to a physician response survey conducted in June, nearly 60 percent of doctors said they weren’t fully vaccinated against the COVID-19 virus.

Back in January, CBS News reported that a significant amount of doctors and other healthcare workers were refusing the get the vaccine as well. Many reported being uneasy with how fast the vaccine was rushed out, or just a standard lack of information about it:

That hesitancy can be surprisingly stubborn to overcome. Surgo polled more than 2,500 U.S. health care workers to assess their comfort in getting vaccinated. At the time of the survey, administered from December 17 to 30, 53% of respondents had been offered the vaccine. Of those workers, 15%, or almost 200 people polled, said they had refused to take the vaccine, with many claiming there is insufficient evidence the treatments are effective, despite assurances otherwise by federal and state health agencies and major pharmaceutical companies.


Another 24% cited personal safety concerns, while 16% said they thought the approval process was too rushed.

Keep in mind that Ph.D. doesn’t necessarily mean a medical degree. One can achieve that level of education in a myriad of subjects so many with this level of education aren’t fully knowledgeable about the ins and outs of medicine. Regardless, hesitancy isn’t the realm of the uneducated. In fact, the highly educated own it even more.



Toward An American Revivalism

 Toward An American Revivalism



It’s time to say “goodbye” to conservatism.


To state the obvious, there is something going on out there on the Right which is a little different.

You see it clearly at the grass-roots level. It shows up brightly in the resistance to the latest round of COVID stupidity — mask mandates for school kids, vaccination discrimination in the workplace, and so on. But you’re even seeing it at the higher levels here and there.

What you’re seeing is that Bush Republicanism, to use one of the terms to describe it, is dead. It might still be twitching, mind you; the abject stupidity of the “bipartisan” infrastructure bill passing with 19 weak GOP Senators signing on demonstrates that it’s still showing spasmodic activity. But it’s off life support, and the prognosis ain’t good.

Something else has taken its place.

You can largely thank Donald Trump for that. Trump was hardly the only one who saw that the post-Reagan GOP mindset, driven as it was by think tanks and other organizations which had long since proven out Eric Hoffer’s famous maxim that “Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket,” had outlived its utility. But Trump understood how to inject life back into the party. For all his faults, Trump reoriented the Right into something else, and now that something is larger than Trump.

I’ve said this before: Trump was never a conservative. He showed more fealty to center-right ideology than any of his national political predecessors, at least since Reagan, but that didn’t make him a conservative. Trump is much more accurately described as a radical centrist. He saw a number of things that both parties were hideously wrong about and he campaigned, and won, on those.

The border was an obvious one. Republican border policy had been made in slavish obeisance to the corporate donor class, which valued cheap labor above all, while Democrats favored open borders because they see millions of slavish Democrat voters on the horizon. Trump came along and broke that wheel, demanding that the border be enforced. And he was right.

He was right on China. He was right on trade policy. He was right on minority outreach. He was right on the endless wars. He was right on the culture. Trump was right in opposing all kinds of issues the “conservative” smart set had put forth as orthodoxy for years as the party declined — and as the country declined.

I’ve also said Trump is less the “messiah” his enemies (and some of his friends) want to cast him as so much as he’s a John the Baptist figure. Trump is the guy who sets the table but perhaps doesn’t serve the meal. That isn’t an indictment of Trump so much as it’s an indictment of where we are as a country.

Where we are isn’t good. Where we are can’t be fixed by one man. It has to be fixed by all of us, and it’s going to take a while. We’ll be at this a lot longer than Trump will be around.

And conservatives, if that label is going to fit a broad swath of people within the Republican Party who have presided over loss after loss since 1992, can’t fix it. We’ve seen that.

When you’ve gone from surrendering on gay marriage to failing to summon up convincing arguments for obvious things like “boys shouldn’t play on girls’ sports teams” or that the least racist nation on planet Earth was founded to promote slavery, you aren’t really conserving much of anything anymore, are you?

When you went from failing to reform government programs like Social Security and Medicare, when it was patently obvious they would eventually bankrupt the government, to signing off on a trillion-dollar bacchanal of “infrastructure” spending only a quarter of which can reasonably fit in that definition, you’re not a fiscal conservative.

When you progressed from creating a security state capable of spying on everyone in the world with marginal accountability to having little to say when that security state gets politicized and nearly effects a coup d’etat on a duly-elected American president, we can’t really say you’re conserving our liberty.

So what are you conserving? And why shouldn’t we snicker when we call you a conservative?

Particularly when it’s clear very few of these politicians who talk a good game during election season bother to deliver when the chips are down. That goes for your local school board which accedes to mandated masks for your kindergartner, your state legislature which won’t ban the corruption of Zuckerbucks blowing up your state’s election integrity, or your governor who’s too worried that Woke Corporate America or the NCAA might punish your state if he or she takes a stand on a trans invasion of the girls’ track teams to do what’s right.

Conservatism is taking on the stench of a dead movement. The racket has ratcheted downward into the muck.

We need something else. We need something new.

America is an idea more than a nation. Our founding principles are what makes us great. They made our people great. Talk to any legal immigrant and they’ll re-orient you along those lines because they know what it’s like in Venezuela, Vietnam, or South Africa. But there is nothing genetic about Americans which makes us better than anybody else.

If we lose those founding principles, we become just another declining, flaccid, pathetic Western country whose best days are past, and whose leaders are busy auctioning themselves off to the ChiComs.

The conservatives haven’t conserved our founding principles. They’ve lost on the culture, the economy, civil liberties, limited government, ethics, the rule of law. Defeat after defeat, and now, while the country is by no means gone as it would surely have been were it not for the incompetence and insanity of the Left, there isn’t as much remaining of those principles as we need there to be.

We don’t need conservation. You don’t conserve the forest after the forest fire. What we need is revival.

Ben Domenech of The Federalist and Fox News had an interesting set of broadcasts as he hosted Fox News Primetime last week. Domenech brought up a long-forgotten footnote in American history, that of the “wide-awakes.” Those folks were a vast fraternity of militant reformers who sprung up across the country in the late 1850s as a reaction to a corrupt and leaderless America. They held marches, they started baseball leagues, they ran voter registration drives, and they provided event security for Abraham Lincoln’s presidential campaign. The wide-awakes rushed into the Union Army when the Civil War broke out. They saved the union and helped build America into the gleaming powerhouse it became in the late 19th and 20th century.

Domenech suggested America needs a fresh batch of “wide-awakes.” He’s not wrong. America needs new energy. It needs revival.

We think of religion when we think of revival. And yes, we need that. Particularly given that this is and has always been a religious nation, but the problem is that political and cultural power now marinates in a decadent, godless, factless religion of climate change, critical race theory, gender as a social construct, and cancel culture. Reclaiming society for the Judeo-Christian faith which created it, rather than this nouveau pagan heresy which is destroying it, is simply a matter of will. It isn’t a matter of merit.

But it’s more than just a religious revival we need. It’s a societal revival. We need to learn to love one another again. To persuade each other rather than to scream. To refound our communities and the civil society we’ve lost. To cultivate the values which made us great rather than indoctrinate each other into endless, pointless, destructive critiques of them.

It isn’t enough to embrace the Benedict Option. It isn’t enough to retreat to the periphery and congratulate yourself for keeping lit the flame of civilization in the hills and hollows of the hinterlands. Staying on defense won’t win the game. We need revivalists who will fight tooth and nail for the country, who will talk big and act bigger. Who will outsmart, outfight, and outplay the tyrants and grifters of the Left and who will inspire the “conservatives” to follow.

To follow, I say. Because they cannot lead. They’ve proven that.

Revivalists don’t make deals with the Left — or if they do, they insist that it’s the Left who puts a pound of their own flesh on the table. No more “win-win” negotiations with “win-lose” counterparts. You walk away from that and then you begin to apply the same kinds of pressure on them that they’ve been applying on those Bush Republicans through the years.

Revivalists don’t push for school choice. Revivalists push for every dime of taxpayer cash spent on education to be controlled by the parents of school kids. Revivalists have no use for scared entry-level politicians on school boards who won’t stand up to teachers’ unions; they want the market to disrupt, destroy, and remake the entire idea of public education. Revivalists are the most pro-teacher folks around; they want to turn that profession into something like that of lawyers or engineers. Lawyers and engineers don’t need unions, by the way.

Revivalists insist on taking the fight to China. Not militarily; this war has been going on for a long time, and its theaters are cultural, economic, and digital. The Left is with the Chinese. Conservatives can’t figure out what their position is. Revivalists remember Reagan: “We win, they lose.”

Revivalists want that border under control. Revivalists have no problem with immigration, though immigration policy has to be made on behalf of American interests, not those of the immigrants. Revivalists refuse to obey much of anything Joe Biden or the Democrats demand of us until that border is brought back under the rule of law. Revivalists will consent to be governed, but never ruled.

Revivalists don’t give a damn about politicians’ problems. Revivalists insist that officeholders be public servants, not members of some privileged elite. For that matter, revivalists couldn’t give a damn about the elite at all; the elite are the people who engineered this mess in the first place.

Revivalists know that America is covered in ripoffs, from higher education to Big Tech to Fannie Mae to pop culture. Revivalists don’t just reject the corruption of the grifters; they insist on reopening America to competitors, to entrepreneurs, to disruptors and dreamers. If the forest fire is to come for our traditions, let it burn away all of the other side’s corrupt incumbents as well.

Revivalists love America. Revivalists aren’t bothered by the fact this country isn’t perfect. No country is. To the critical theory crowd, revivalists demand first that they offer something better rather than constant bitching and grifting. And then revivalists argue that grifting and bitching are not sufficient résumé items for leadership. What has Ibram X. Kendi ever done to help the black community?

Revivalists revere our historical figures. Revivalists demand more statues, not fewer. Revivalists want to learn from the rich history of our country and all of Western civilization, and even other civilizations. Revivalists will buy a Jeep Cherokee to pay tribute to the heritage of the Cherokee. Revivalists think the Cleveland Guardians is a soulless, lifeless team name undeserving of respect. And revivalists see in Megan Rapinoe everything the Left, with the tacit acquiescence of the conservatives, has done to this country.

Revivalists are bookmarking Rumble and Bitchute in response to Rand Paul being banned from YouTube for rightly pointing out that masks don’t work. Revivalists remember when Google’s motto was “Don’t be evil” and laugh at how pathetic a joke that has become.

Revivalists know there are only two genders. Revivalists also know that the people insisting otherwise demand an end to the discussion because their arguments are bullshit.

And revivalists know that America isn’t dead. America won’t die until the fight for the principles that made us is over. And revivalists will never, evergive up that fight. Revivalists will raise the stakes as high as necessary to keep it going, until it’s the other side who quits.

Be a revivalist. Let’s roll. We have a lot of work to do.


Why Do Capitol Hill Police Keep Turning Up Dead?

Our country is becoming fact-blind as politicized and 
often erroneous reporting crowds out real news.


On the day of the January 6 Capitol unrest, the Capitol Police force numbered approximately 2,300. Of those, only a few hundred were on duty when the breach took place. Four officers have since died from apparent suicide.

That might seem like a point of grim trivia until one considers how atypical these suicides are. The military has long fretted over the tragically high suicide rate among our veterans, roughly “27.5 per 100,000 individuals in 2018 . . . By comparison, among all U.S. adults, the suicide rate per 100,000 was 18.3.” According to the Centers for Disease Control, men engaged in professions related to mining, quarrying, oil and gas, have the highest suicide rates of any profession (even above our veterans) at 52.2 per 100,000 per year.

Assume for discussion that rather than just a few hundred, half of the Capitol Police force responded to the January 6 breach. All four of the officers who apparently committed suicide were among the responding officers. Four suicides in roughly six months among a sample of 1,150 suggests a suicide rate of 695 suicides per 100,000 per year. That would mean that since January 6, the Capitol Police commit suicide at a rate that’s more than 10 times the most suicide-prone profession and more than 20 times the rate among U.S. veterans. But since only a few hundred showed up to the Capitol breach, the rate must be much higher than even that!

That’s a disturbing pattern and it should be investigated.

Why is this happening? The media narrative holds that these officers are delayed casualties of the January 6 breach incident. The legislation awarding gold medals to the responding officers declared, “It is the sense of the Congress that the United States Mint should expedite production of the gold medals . . . under this Act, so that the sacrifices of fallen officers and their families, . . . who answered the call of duty on January 6, 2021, can be recognized and honored in a timely manner.” 

Clearly, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) counts officer suicides as casualties of the January 6 events.

But that’s a very unsatisfying explanation. The riot ended that same day and it hasn’t been repeated. The officers undoubtedly were under stress as the events unfolded. But they have not been through the kind of daily immediate physical danger experienced by a soldier patrolling in Afghanistan or a miner risking his life under millions of tons of rock. 

D.C. is a cocoon of anti-Trump culture. The media and D.C.-based politicians have publicly heaped praise and support on the responding officers. The Capitol Police budget is set to balloon and already exceeds the budget of police forces in most major American cities. The entire event was relatively short-lived and the D.C. Police have mobilized counselors and mental health services to mitigate the supposed stress of the event. There has to be another contributing factor to these apparent suicides.

Shortly after the incident, the Associated Press revealed that 31 of the suspects who breached the Capitol were also law enforcement officers. Business Insider reported that police departments were facing “pressure to weed out white nationalists.” While there was no suggestion that any of the protesters were off-duty Capitol police, the headline strongly suggests that the Capitol Police force itself has begun to look into the politics of its officers. How do the political commissars hunting “white nationalists” define their quarry? Within D.C., the term basically means “Republican.”

Can any of these suicides be linked to an effort to purge the Capitol Police? Were any of the four officers confronted with threats of public humiliation for their private politics? One cannot ignore that the highly publicized effort to weed out “white nationalists” within law enforcement coincided with the sudden rash of suicides.

I’ve found no reference in any article to a suicide note or other direct evidence that might help shed light on the motives of the officers believed to have taken their own lives. Instead, as always, the tragedies were simply shoehorned into the greater political narrative—namely, that the January 6 protestors killed police officers, directly or indirectly.

This is not the first time the media distorted the facts to reinforce the January 6 narrative. 

In April, the New York Times revised a January 8, 2021 article that previously claimed a Trump supporter used a fire extinguisher to murder Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick. Sicknick died of a stroke on January 7 and the medical examiner found no link to any injury allegedly sustained during the melee the day before. Yet the Times continues to claim, without evidence, that Sicknick, “died on Thursday night from injuries sustained while physically engaging with pro-Trump rioters who descended on the U.S. Capitol the day before.” In spite of the thousands of cameras that recorded events from every angle, no suspect has ever been charged with inflicting the injuries that supposedly caused Sicknick’s death.

Adding to the puzzle are the other mysterious deaths among the protestors. In addition to the shooting death of Ashli Babbitt, the Times reported that three other protestors died of “natural causes.” 

The reporting on the January 6 Capitol incursion is a symptom of an accelerating trend—a kind of journalistic macular degeneration. Like an elderly person slowly losing her eyesight, our country is becoming fact-blind as politicized and often erroneous reporting crowds out real news. How many more officers need to die before we start looking at what might be causing this tragic pattern?


Joe Biden Weighs Mandating Vaccines for Interstate Travel

 

President Joe Biden is weighing vaccines mandates for interstate travel, according to the Associated Press (AP) on Thursday.

“Still, while more severe [coronavirus] measures — such as mandating vaccines for interstate travel or changing how the federal government reimburses treatment for those who are unvaccinated and become ill with COVID-19 — have been discussed,” the AP writes, “the administration worried that they would be too polarizing for the moment.”

 

 

For the time being, the White House seems content with shaming those who are unvaccinated, while demanding private companies mandate vaccinations for their employees.

For instance, Biden told churchgoers April 1, they were being ungodly if they did not become vaccinated. “I think this is the godly thing to do. Protect your brother and sister,” he said. “That’s what this is about. It’s about protecting people.”

On July 2, Biden explained that black Tuskegee airmen “were almost like guinea pigs,” when answering a question about vaccine hesitancy in the black community:

You know, you go back just to — even World War II, African Americans were used as experimental — they were almost like guinea pigs in terms of — they were — anyway, it — and your mom and dad remember that and your grandparents remember that.

Likewise, Biden stated June 24, it was hard to get all Hispanics in America vaccinated for the coronavirus because of their fear of getting deported. “It’s awful hard to get Latinx vaccinated as well,” Biden said about all Latinos. “Why? They’re worried that they’ll be vaccinated and deported.”

Vice President Kamala Harris warned Americans July 19 that if they did not conform and get vaccinated, they would cause continued mask mandates. “No one likes wearing masks… people need to get vaccinated. That’s the only way we’re going to cut this off,” she explained. “Nobody likes wearing a mask.”

Meanwhile, Biden’s push to have private business mandate masks continued Wednesday with airline executives. But Reuters reported, “companies have wrestled with the extent of their authority to require shots.”

“Among the concerns is the possibility that companies will be exposed to discrimination lawsuits as they call staff back to their desks after 18 months of pandemic-induced work from home,” the report added.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/08/13/joe-biden-vaccines-interstate-travel/ 

 

 


 

COVID-19, The Color Revolution, The Intelligence Branch and Over a Decade of Test Nudges


It has been almost ten years since CTH first outlined the 1984 interview between Yuri Bezmenov and G. Edward Griffin titled “Deception was My Job”.  [2013 CTH Article Here] However, it is worth revisiting the interview as we find ourselves increasingly influenced by a deliberate effort to control U.S. society.

Mr. Yuri Bezmenov was a Soviet informant and KGB operative who defected to the United States in the early 70s.  Within the interview [full video here], Bezmenov lays out the four stages of “ideological subversion” created by radical Marxists to indoctrinate and weaken nations from within.

It is my contention the Chicago Marxists aligned with Barack Obama (revolutionary communists) were/are following this ‘four stage’ roadmap.  The U.S. State Department is filled with like-minded travelers who align with this approach.

Some researchers have identified the objective as connected to the Fabian Socialist goal, others have called it “The Color Revolution”, but the names do not matter much; what matters is the map they follow, the four stages:

♦Stage One: Demoralization – Elimination of American Exceptionalism, fundamental change of national identity, structural deconstruction of foundational principles, elimination of religion. Embedding a new societal design upon the psyche of generations through ideological academia. Peer pressure by elites upon academics and society to convince that prior values were inherently flawed, racist, prejudiced etc. National identity is diluted with aspersions toward historical references. National history is re-written, re-defined, and molded to fit the new intended behavioral model and create the new values.

♦Stage Two: Crisis – Creation of economic, financial, and national security crisis. Also includes social crisis and breakdown of previous self-evident restrictions on moral behavior. Cloward Piven approach to overloading the system, ie more takers than producers. The crisis produces benevolent leaders who will promise to deliver “things” (Hope and Change) to meet people’s needs through Social and Economic Justice. False illusions that the situation is under control if certain strategic directions are followed (Bailouts, Stimulus, Jobs Bills, Regulations of industry, Unconstitutional Power Grabs, Dismissal of Historical Laws, Changes in legislative processes, Changes in checks and balances of power etc).

♦Stage Three: Normalization – The uncomfortable feelings of change including losses of freedom are absorbed and accepted. Lost national identity becomes accepted as the norm within the new societal model. A period of national rebranding transition where people are so overwhelmed by the change they become numb and begin to accept a ‘new normal’. This period of normalization lasts indefinitely as the progression is continually advanced and acceptance takes place in small controlled doses. (New limits on behavior, Regulations, TSA Patdowns, Intrusions into privacy, Controls into daily life) These things begin to be accepted as “just the way it is now”..

♦Stage Four: Destabilization – Unlike the period of “Crisis” the people who helped orchestrate the change are now no longer needed. The new overarching centralized governmental model begins to take control. Leftist usurpers who initially thought they were going to be part of the new power structure begin to realize they were used and manipulated and they themselves become the new enemy. Because they have first hand knowledge of the agenda they are the primary target for elimination. They may simply be disregarded, obfuscated, thrown out, or they may be collected, imprisoned, or worse killed. There is no longer room for dissention. Dissent is only possible within the free system that has now been deconstructed. Therefore the leftist purpose is served once the destabilization is complete. Totalitarian Government takes control.



Perhaps a reasonable person would argue that elimination of economic capacity (to live freely) is just as restrictive as living inside a walled camp. If you cannot live freely, earn a living freely, move about without restrictions, and determine for yourself your choices, then what really is the difference between being thrown in an internment camp and having the invisible chain link fence of diminished freedom built around your home?

If government can control your income through taxation, employment and redistribution; tell you what to eat by deciding your choices for you; tell you how much energy you are allowed to consume through rules and regulation; tell you what kind of car you can be allowed to drive; tell you what type of toilet you can buy; tell you what kind of detergent you may wash with; determine what information you have access to through the TV media and internet access; and then control your capacity to receive the healthcare of your choice; then really what is the difference between living in a collective camp under such rules and living where you are now but following the same rules ?

I would argue that we are solidly in the middle of stage #3 (normalization), while all around us Stage Four (destabilization) is beginning, perhaps as planned. We talk about the new “isms” all the time. Heck, most of what we discuss is our reluctance to engage in acceptance of the “normalization”, and our seeming frustration to be able to influence “it” to stop presenting us with new acceptance challenges.

♦Everything you just read above was written in 2013.  If we consider the constant nudges, probes and pushes from the leftists in government and society (BLM, Antifa, Occupy Wall Street, etc.), we can consider them as different approaches, tests or probes per se’, toward the same totalitarian outcome.  Then if we overlay the weaponization of COVID-19 fear as the biggest effort so far, well, from that perspective SARS-CoV-2 takes on a new strategic dimension.

FOLLOW THE DOTS […] Through the Dept of State (DoS) the intelligence apparatus began working on their first steps to align Big Tech with a larger domestic institutional objective. Those of you who remember the “Arab Spring”, some say “Islamist Spring”, will remember it was triggered by Barack Obama’s speech in Cairo – his first foreign trip. The State Department worked with grassroots organizers (mostly Muslim Brotherhood) in Egypt, Syria, Bahrain, Qatar and Libya. Obama leaned heavily on the organizational network of Turkish President Recep Erdogan for contacts and support.

Why does this aspect matter to us? Well, you might remember how much effort the Obama administration put into recruiting Facebook and Twitter as resources for the various mid-east rebellions the White House and DoS supported. This was the point of modern merge between the U.S. intelligence community and Big Tech social media.

In many ways the coordinated political outcomes in Libya and Egypt were the beta test for the coordinated domestic political outcomes we saw in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The U.S. intelligence community working with social media platforms and political operatives.  (continue reading)

Overlay climate change as a tool, a sociological tool.  How many easily manipulated minds really believe in climate change?  How many people around the world genuinely believe, as their very core essence and worldview,  that man-made climate change is a threat to our species?

Putting aside the fact the behavior of global elites does not reflect their belief in the very Climate Change agenda they sell, what would a weaponized Climate Change agenda really look like?   And…. if humans really were the extinction level threat that many now accept as true, what would the sheeple masses be willing to accept in order to stop it?

Through those multi-dimensional prisms of manipulation – the four stage processes that Yuri Bezmenov describes in the interview could be viewed as steps toward fulfillment of the actual agenda.

What stands in their way?

Us…