Sunday, June 27, 2021

Jim Acosta's Obsession With Marjorie Taylor Greene Takes a Really Weird Turn


Bonchie reporting for RedState 

CNN’s Jim Acosta is not a journalist. That’s been thoroughly established over the last several years, from his wild, partisan rantings as a White House correspondent during the Trump era to his profanity-filled tirades on the low-rated weekend show he now anchors. This is a man with serious issues, and those issues have been exacerbated by his obsession with January 6th, and by proxy, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Apparently, the stalwart newsman decided he’d go to Capitol Hill to “get answers” about the now almost seven-month-old incident. You know, because no one has talked about January 6th to this point. We obviously need more “answers.”

Things just get weird from there.

The problem here is obvious. Why is Acosta continuing to stalk Greene, a back-bencher representative he can’t seem to ever stop talking about, to demand answers from her, if he apparently already has them? If he’s so invested in and sure of the idea that Donald Trump is directly responsible for what happened on January 6th, what else is he hoping to learn by asking the same question over and over? Greene, regardless of how any personal opinions about her, doesn’t owe Acosta a repetition of his talking points.

This entire exchange just comes across like a child throwing a tantrum because he doesn’t get what he wants. If Acosta wants to be a journalist, then be a journalist. Ask questions, get answers, and report on those answers — regardless of what you think personally of the person you are interviewing. But as I said, Acosta is not a journalist. Rather, he’s a hack, partisan operative who isn’t even talented enough to mask his biases, thus his demotion to playing roving weekend reporter with a show that gets out-rated by reruns of “Pawn Stars.”

Everything about his interaction with Greene is just odd. The way he approaches her, his inability to accept that she might have different opinions, and his absolute obsession with January 6th in general. It’s like he believes it’s his mission in life to “prove” that Trump caused a few hours of trespassing and vandalism that culminated in a Trump supporter being shot by police.

That will never be proven, though, because it doesn’t match the facts in evidence nor is he applying a standard he holds any Democrat politician to. Has Acosta ever accused Rep. Maxine Waters of causing violence despite the fact that she pretty clearly called for it? No, he hasn’t, because this is an entirely partisan pursuit for him.

When Acosta later went after Rep. Mo Brooks with the same nonsense, he got the reception he truly deserved.

That’s how Greene should have handled him. She should have said “wait, who do you work for?” and then laughed in his face at the idea that she’d answer any questions. Republicans do not owe these people anything. Acosta and the like wouldn’t know the truth if it slapped them in the face, and they certainly aren’t going to report honestly on anything that doesn’t line up directly with their political worldview.

Meanwhile, almost all of America could not care less about this stuff. They are too busy dealing with out-of-control inflation and an economy that has been kneecapped by Democrat power. Continual recriminations involving January 6th are the domain of beltway-dwelling partisans who don’t have to operate in the real world.

Acosta simply can’t let go of the Trump era. It was his entire identity, and obsessing over Greene is just an extension of that. There’s something rather sad about that. It’s long past time for someone to stage an intervention. This man needs help.


Hypocritical Race Theory

 


Article by Derek Hunter in Townhall


Hypocritical Race Theory

There are few things liberals love more than crying racism, but not many. Money from perverts, abusing power, and maybe some of their families, but that’s about it. Crying racism is oxygen to the average Democrat, but it’s heroin for elected and media Democrats and the addiction they have for it makes Hunter Biden’s love of crack and hookers seem like passionate indifference. It is their precious and these Gollums will do anything to ensure its use is their exclusive domain. Unfortunately for them, its practice is also their exclusive domain.

The Nazis were not as dogged as Democrats are in their pursuit of purity. Everything is either racist or progressive. But the lie between the two is no line at all, it’s a fence around both because the two are symbiotic – progressivism and progressives are racists, at their very core.

The thing about leftists is they do show you exactly who they are, all you have to do is watch and listen. When then candidate Joe Biden said “Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids,” he was accidentally admitting he equates being poor with being black. It wasn’t a revelation, either to Joe or anyone who has followed his long career of casual but insistent racism, but it was quickly glossed over and forgotten. 

The racism from the left is ignored, which is a shame because it’s where racism truly lives in the halls of power. Rhode Island Democrat Senator Sheldon Whiteprivilege, er, Whitehouse, is a member of at least 3 organizations that, while not explicitly laid out in their charters, do not allow for minority membership. Whiteguy, er, Whitehouse acts as woke as they come in Senate hearings, and is always quick to attack Republicans as racists. Yet, Whitepower, er, Whitehouse’s membership in restricted, or as the left-wing media calls them “exclusive,” clubs has been known since 2006.

When he first ran in 2006, Whiterage, er, Whitehouse said he would quit his whites only beach club. He didn’t. When confronted about it again in 2017, he said the all-white club was making progress on diversity. How, exactly, you can “make progress” on diversity without actually opening the club up to black people or adding any real diversity is not known, nor is it known how Whitebread, er, Whitehouse could claim the subject was beyond his control when his wife is a major stockholder in the club and could, if Sheldon insisted, immediately bring about the change the club has somehow been working unsuccessfully on for at least 2 decades.

That Sheldon Crackerhome, er, Whitehouse is a hypocritical racist pile of garbage isn’t the shocking revelation in this story (I mean, come on, his NAME is Sheldon Whitehouse, for crying out loud). No, the most disturbing part of this story is the fact that he’s gotten away with it all his entire career. 

Sheldon’s “whites only” affinities were known in 2006 and don’t appear to have been an issue he was even asked about again until 2017. After that, they went away again until what is basically a local blog bothered to confront him on it again last week. 

Leftist media has a hair-trigger when it comes to accusing non-leftist people of racism – they absolutely love it. But when one of their own actually is a racist, it’s not a story. Of all the liberal networks – MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC – only CNN mentioned the story at all on air this week, exactly twice (with one of those times occurring in the wee hours of the morning). 

Meanwhile, these same media Democrats spend hour after hour simultaneously claiming Critical Race Theory is not being taught in schools while claiming to be offended that the use of Critical Race Theory in schools is being banned. Why would they care if something that isn’t happening is banned? 

MSNBC’s senior fellow in being a racist fraud, Joy Reid, invited Christopher Rufo on her show this week on the very subject of CRT and would not let the man speak. Reid, a well-documented dumpster fire of ethics scandals and outright lies, spoke over and interrupted Rufo to prevent her audience from hearing any semblance of a differing opinion. She truly is the Tokyo Rosé of the modern Klan – the progressive left’s attempt at conformity through the purifying of thoughts and actions by repeatedly lying. Some might as a series of “big lies.”

When it comes to race, its weaponization is what the left does. The hypocritical race theory belched out by Democrats is nearly as offensive as the racism that defines their existence. It saturates their body to the bone. From the United States Senate to the studios of elite cable channels to the halls of once-great institutions of higher learning all the way up to the Oval Office, the conga line of hypocritical liberals never stops beating the drum of racism. I wonder if they realize they’re beating it for themselves? 

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2021/06/27/hypocritical-race-theory-n2591634 


Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


Club Moves, Pence and Haley Coordinating With Establishment GOP


The one issue that frustrates me personally; amid the known deep weeds and moves of the RNC as a club and their vitriolic hatred for the Tea Party before and MAGA movement now; is why President Trump continues to express confidence in Ronna McDaniel.

Yes, there is always going to be intra-party factions within the Republican system as a whole.  However, the (at best) 10 to 20% of the club establishment, the Wall Street Multinational faction, are toxic to the objectives of restorative Americanism.  The club elites, and this includes current RNC head Ronna McDaniel, simply hate the vulgarian middle-class and the base of the movement.  Yet, for some unknown reason Donald Trump allows this to continue.

McDaniel is working against the interests of the MAGA base.  The head of the RNC does nothing to highlight demonstrable election fraud; she stands aside and watches as media frame an extremist narrative against the base of the party she is supposed to represent.  McDaniel does nothing to support the legal alliance needed to push back against election fraud; and worse yet she does nothing to support the recruitment of MAGA minded candidates to lead the middle-class working revolution against the corrupt political system.  Yet, amid these brutally obvious realities no-one ever seems to call it out.

Where is McDaniel in support of the Maricopa audit: or the Fulton County Georgia legal battle; or the Pennsylvania legislative effort to strengthen their legislative reform efforts?  Or closer to home, where was/is McDaniel when clear evidence of voting corruption exists in her home state of Michigan and Antrim County?   No-one except CTH ever seems to point out the total absence of the RNC support in these grassroot efforts to have secure and authentic elections.  WHY?

But this article really isn’t about McDaniel insofar as she is merely a representative -albeit stark- example of the brutally obvious issues within the false premise of the two party system…. the two club system.  CTH readers have an exhaustive library of specific facts, events, documents and statements that show how the club is operating against our interests; the example above is just a reminder to pause amid the granular fight and say “what a minute, where’s the damn RNC, ain’t this their job?”

Here’s the rub.  The RNC club has a visible set of priorities and an invisible set of standards that apply only to the top donor class, the BlackRock Republicans within the party, and they work intentionally and willfully to keep those standards and priorities clouded from the electoral base.  The RNC actively works against our interests, and yet so many within the MAGA community cannot see it, even though they feel it… they know it to be true, but they cannot accept it.

Let me give you an example of how the “club” is quietly operating using Mike Pence and Nikki Haley as an example and a warning.

You might remember a few months ago when former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley said:

“I don’t think [Trump’s] going to be in the picture,” she said, matter-of-factly. “I don’t think he can. He’s fallen so far.” […] “We need to acknowledge he let us down,” she said. “He went down a path he shouldn’t have, and we shouldn’t have followed him, and we shouldn’t have listened to him. And we can’t let that ever happen again.”  (link)

Yet yesterday the conniving creature of the club said the exact opposite in an effort to get back into position of influence.

WEST DES MOINES, Iowa — Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley reaffirmed her support for former President Donald Trump in a speech Thursday night, just months after flaying him for his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot and predicting that his political career was finished.

The potential 2024 presidential candidate lavished praise on Trump during an evening appearance before the Iowa Republican Party’s Lincoln Dinner, a major party gathering in the all-important, first-in-the-nation caucus state. (more)

Don’t miss the motive here.  The people behind the club are positioning Nikki Haley and Mike Pence as a defense against MAGA.  They do not care about winning the election in 2022, 2024 or any other election.  What they care about is their money and power.  They want to retain their Wall Street and Multinational investment programs to keep their wealth growing and remain atop the pyramid.

Both Nikki Haley and Mike Pence are tools for the Wall Street class of republicans, the $8 trillion BlackRock investment class to retain wealth and power.  They are positioning to take down Trump and then step in to grab the flag and keep the base from recognizing their deceptive agenda.  Haley and Pence support the DOJ and current federal government effort to destroy Donald J Trump and by extension the MAGA movement.

At the same time Haley is delivering her conniving Brutus speech to the Iowa audience, her comrade in arms is delivering a similar message to an audience in California.

These are evil, yes I said that word “evil” conniving people.  These are not allies aligned with an earnest middle class fight against the elitist system that controls the levers of power.  These are the gaslighting foot-soldiers for the same system that wants to see us destroyed.  WATCH Pence:

“The presidency belongs to the American people and the American people alone and I will always be proud that we did our part on that tragic day to reconvene the Congress and fulfilled our duty under the Constitution…There’s more at stake than our party and our political fortunes in this moment. If we lose faith in the Constitution, we won’t just lose elections. We will lose our country. So now more than ever, America needs the Republican Party to be the party of the Constitution.”



From the tailgate of a pickup truck while I remain unwashed with dirty fingernails I swear you this: “I despise these people with the heat of a thousand supernovas.”  They are the most vile and Machiavellian manipulators within our nation. They are no different than Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and any other breed of self-indulgent political class that defines themselves by the affluence they gain from the backs of the American middle-class.

In another day and age they would be covered in hot tar and feathers and ridiculed out of town… alas, today we watch the audience clap like seals while shaking our head at the insufferable stupidity of our brothers and sisters not to be able to see the scheme for what it is.

Eight years ago CTH spent almost two years following, tracking and researching their RNC club moves.  We had sources and moles all around them in every meeting.

Six years ago CTH outlined the playbook they use to control election outcomes and we specifically mapped out the ‘splitter strategy‘ they would deploy, AGAIN, to execute their scheme.  In 2016 they triggered every single tripwire we predicted in the exact and specific sequence we outlined they would…. And I am telling you right now,…

….the Club is at it again.

No F**king Quarter!


Drug firms giving MPs ‘hidden’ funding, research shows

 Pharmaceutical industry has “hidden web of policy influence” over dozens of all-party parliamentary groups

 

 

 

Drug companies are giving groups of MPs and peers that campaign on health issues hundreds of thousands of pounds a year in “hidden” funding that could hand them “undue influence”, research has found.

The pharmaceutical industry has built up a “hidden web of policy influence” over dozens of all-party parliamentary groups (APPGs) at Westminster by making hundreds of “non-transparent” payments to them, as part of the industry’s wider effort to lobby those in power, researchers claim.

The findings raise questions about the independence of APPGs, the voluntary special interest cross-party groups of members of both houses of parliament that seek to influence ministers and government departments through reports, inquiries and meetings at Westminster.

Fifty-eight APPGs focusing on different aspects of health received 468 payments totalling just under £2.2m in direct and indirect funding from pharmaceutical firms between 2012 and 2018, academics from the University of Bath found. APPGs receive no money from parliament to support their activities, which often involve ministers being questioned and being sent reports.

“In the context of health-related APPGs, payments from the pharmaceutical industry represent institutional conflicts of interest as they create circumstances where the primary interest, policymaking in the interests of public health, is at risk of being unduly influenced by he secondary interest, the pharmaceutical industry’s goal of maximising profits”, the authors conclude, in a paper published on Thursday evening in the medical journal PLOS One.

 

 

 

Drug companies can use their close relationship with APPGs to contribute to their inquiries, argue for policies that favour their commercial interests and have that reflected in reports, all without the public knowing about those links, according to Emily Rickard and Dr Piotr Ozieranski, from Bath University’s department of social and policy sciences.

They uncovered the long history of funding by examining parliament’s register of APPGs and drug company payment disclosure reports. Both sources contain information about big pharma’s funding of APPGs, and also its financing of health charities, which often act as the secretariat for APPGs. But the details given were often vague, incomplete and hard to understand, the authors said.

 

 

Their research found:

  • 16 health-related APPGs received 168 payments from 35 drug firms worth £1.2m in 2012-18 – one-sixth of their total funding

  • Two APPGs, on health and cancer, accepted more than £600,000 in that time

  • 50 health-focused APPGs received almost another £1m in 304 payments from patient organisations or health charities, which themselves take sums of money from big pharma

“We are not attacking any APPG or alleging any impropriety. However, there is a dilemma. The APPGs are a key part of policymaking and it is clear that corporate money is entering the APPG bloodstream”, Rickard and Ozieranski told the Guardian.

“Something must be done to mitigate against potential influence which normal citizens or NGOs won’t be able to exert.”

The revelations led to calls for greater openness about where APPG funding comes from.

“APPGs have an important role to play in holding the government to account and shaping policy by bringing together voices from across the political spectrum and from a range of stakeholders”, said Dr John Chisholm, the chair of the British Medical Association’s medical ethics committee.

 

 

 

“However, it is vitally important that there is full transparency around who is behind these groups and what is driving their calls for change. This is especially important for the development of health policy, which must be underpinned by the principle of improving the health of the population, and not risk being swayed by other conflicting interests.”

Justin Madders, a shadow health minister, said: “It is hugely concerning if big pharma and other vested interests are using the cover of these groups, which were set up with the best of intentions, to circumvent the normal rules on probity and transparency.

“There is a need for clearer rules on funding and conflicts of interest to ensure important health issues are not used as a vehicle to push private interests.”

But Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, a Labour peer and the treasurer of the all-party parliamentary health group, countered that APPGs’ lack of funding from parliament left them reliant on external organisations.

“APPGs need a lot of support to be run effectively. There is no funding available so its inevitable that outside organisations are asked to fund”, he said.

“In these circumstances it is an imperative on the parliamentarians who serve as honorary officers to make sure that financial sponsors do not improperly influence the outcome of APPG work.

“That is certainly the case with the APPG on health, where the sponsors come nowhere near our decisions on programmes.”

 

 

Elliot Dunster of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry said: “APPGs facilitate discussions between MPs, peers and stakeholders in an open and transparent way. A number of these groups are supported by charities, trade associations and companies to carry out research, reports and meetings.

“There is strict parliamentary guidance on APPGs and a complete register – there is no hidden funding from pharmaceutical companies for MPs.”

On Having Whiteness


 

 Potrzebie!!!!

 

Article by Donald Moss in PubMed.Gov /  The National Library of Medicine
 

On Having Whiteness

Abstract

Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has-a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which "white" people have a particular susceptibility. The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one's body, in one's mind, and in one's world. Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts' appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples. Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate. Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness's infiltrated appetites-to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation. When remembered and represented, the ravages wreaked by the chronic condition can function either as warning ("never again") or as temptation ("great again"). Memorialization alone, therefore, is no guarantee against regression. There is not yet a permanent cure.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34039063/ 

 




Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


Election Integrity: The Firewall That Keeps America Free


During the last year and a half it’s become obvious to anyone whose head is not in the sand that America has been under assault on multiple levels from within. There is no denying that the COVID-19 viral invasion was a catalyst for so much of the disruption of 2020, culminating in election irregularity in November.

By spring 2020 normal activities and businesses were largely shut down nationwide by federal and local governments’ response to Covid-19. Antifa and BLM protests and riots in May and June brought the most costly manmade damage to American property in history.

Then the cancel culture, already ensconced and in control of college and university campuses, came to the streets and parks of America in the tearing down of historic monuments—all the while law enforcement was coming under severe attack with numerous police departments facing prospects of defunding.

This lockdown-crisis environment gave Democrats an opportunity to push for change in state election rules to their advantage, such as allowing wholesale distribution of mail-in ballots, extension of deadlines for counting those ballots, and legal challenges to voter ID and signature verification laws. And we all now know the result: the Nov. 3 election was characterized by unprecedented election irregularities and charges of vote fraud in more states than any prior election.

Four Stages of Communism

The confluence of all this has certainly brought on confusion for many Americans. But a significant group of people believe they see things with clarity.

Where I live in South Florida it’s an incredible melting pot of people—immigrants from all over the world. Many of my acquaintances and friends—from Eastern and Slavic Europe and Russia, Latin America, and Southeast Asia—have commented that what they see going on in America is a fairly classic communist-type subversion.

They believe that the takedown of America is well-advanced and now poses a real threat to continuation of the United States as a free nation.

My immigrant and refugee friends point out that the communist playbook is really quite easy to understand. Several who lived under communist systems commented that communist revolutionaries are masters at using false fronts, whether critical race theory or social justice Marxist theories of wealth redistribution to advance their real objective which is one-party rule and total control of society. While my friends see this so clearly, they are dumbfounded and mystified that so many American people remain so naïve and passive in the face of cancel culture, censorship, and creeping cultural totalitarianism that is so obviously and rapidly redefining the country.

While there are minor differences in theory amongst the victims of communism, they basically agree that communists generally target four primary institutions to break down and replace: 1) the Family unit; 2) Religion and in particular Christianity; 3) Individuality and independent thinking (which is supplanted by collectivist group think); and 4) Loyalty to the nation state (which is supplanted by global and internationalist affinities).

My friends also agree on the four steps or stages that communists employ to take over targeted peoples and nations. First, communists seek to bring about “demoralization,” which takes many years—a generation or two—of brainwashing to destroy the moral fiber and integrity of the target people or country.

The second stage, which is shorter, is to bring about “destabilization,” and targets the weakening of the country’s economy, justice system and law enforcement, and its defense capabilities.

The third stage is to bring about a “crisis.” This is the last major step in the communist playbook, which usually involves a cataclysmic event that upsets and divides the country—pitting large groups against each other, creating either civil war or simply chaos and panic.

The fourth and final stage in the realization of the communist-type society is what is called “normalization,” and it is generally irreversible. That is the final stage where the new powerbrokers take over and the populace of the target country loses all its remaining freedoms, its connection to its past, while the new state employs censorship and propaganda to enforce acquiescence to the new reality imposed by the communist state.

According to the “four stages of communist revolution,” the United States is clearly in the third Crisis Stage, with division making the country nearly ungovernable and revolutionary change being manifest in a fraudulent election.

Not only is Joe Biden’s election legitimacy as President in question, but his fundamental trustworthiness is in question because of son Hunter taking large monetary sums on behalf of the Biden family from corrupt foreign countries, with China being the largest benefactor.

Soft Coup

The greatest crime against the American people and the U.S. Constitution is the soft coup of election fraud.

We all sense that many people in high places in the U.S. government have for many years violated their oaths of office and became compromised by gaming the system to gain wealth and stature. And with America now sometimes seeming to have a corrupt two-tiered justice system that gives cover and protection to a favored political party and its chosen figures, it is only free and fair elections that are the peoples’ chief Constitutional check on corruption. When election integrity is lost, the country will be lost.

Our communist enemies likely view the forensic audits of election results in Arizona and elsewhere as a means of keeping the Crisis Stage going. Regardless of the facts, the mainstream and social media will in all probability either ignore or discredit audit outcome results that are contrary to their narrative that denies the existence of 2020 election fraud. And with probably 40 percent of the American population being brainwashed and demoralized, the Crisis Stage in America is clearly a high-risk period.

While this late-stage challenge is frightening, America has overcome many equally daunting challenges throughout its past. And, historically, Americans have exhibited a tendency to wake up and rally at the 11th hour.

The good news is that a greater number of American are now more informed and better prepared to accept election audit findings and consequences than they would have been in the two and a half months immediately after the election, when Trump was still in office.

What is critical now is that the people fully realize that the freedoms they have enjoyed under the democratic constitutional republic of the United States can only be guaranteed at this point by election integrity. There simply is no substitute for victory in the fight to restore and protect the honesty of our electoral system. Election integrity is the indispensable firewall to keep America a free nation.


Who Will Benefit Long-Term from Ending the Filibuster?

Eliminating the Senate procedure could be a key step
 in dismantling the progressive administrative state. 


The filibuster compels moderation and helps protect the country from wild swings between opposing policy poles,” U.S. Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) wrote in the Washington Post last week. “To those who want to eliminate the legislative filibuster to empower federal agencies to better protect the environment or strengthen education: Would it be good for our country if we did, only to see federal agencies and programs shrunk, starved of resources, or abolished a few years from now? 

Sinema is half-right: without the filibuster, there could be wild swings in favor of repealing progressive policies and restoring constitutional government. 

From the first day of a constitutionalist president, the progressive administrative state would be comprehensively blocked. In one session of a constitutionalist-majority Congress, the progressive state would be fully repealed. 

Sinema is wrong that these massive increases in freedom would be followed by wild swings back to progressive coercion. 

Fact is, it has taken since 1894—127 years and counting—to build up the progressive state to its current mass. 

Eliminating the progressive state would put tens of thousands of government employees out of work, so this would undoubtedly feel like a disaster to Sinema’s friends. 

But it would return a substantial fraction of taxpayer dollars back to the people. Outside the D.C. and progressive media bubbles, such efforts would be wildly popular, to an extent that might catch many progressive politicians totally off guard. 

The last time we managed to keep for ourselves a stimulus of this magnitude, first the American colonies’ people substantially outpaced the world-power England’s people in purchasing power. Next, the new nation’s people rapidly grew to become the world power ourselves. 

Freedom brings good results fast, and good results are self-reinforcing. Freedoms were restored to various degrees in the nations of the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. In 25 years and counting, the restored freedom almost never fell back, even temporarily. What differed among these nations was only how fully various freedoms were restored, and how quickly. 

Sinema is dead wrong to think that once we restored some freedom, we would swing, wildly, back to tyranny. It didn’t happen that way in America in the first place, it didn’t happen that way in the nations of the former Soviet Union, and it wouldn’t happen that way in America in the future. 

Unfortunately, Sinema also is likely wrong that the progressive state might be abolished a few years from now, at least by her current Republican colleagues. 

Examples abound, from Republican majorities’ failure to repeal Obamacare, to Republicans’ near-universal embracing of an obscure Juneteenth holiday that permanently rewards Progressives for the 2020-2021 jailbreaks and the Black Lives Matter/Antifa riots, destruction, attacks of nonblacks, and killings of nonblacks. 

Even the five-year-average Conservative Review Liberty Scores show that among the Republican senators, the swing voter—Susan Collins of Maine—casts major votes on behalf of the Progressive state 88 percent of the time. 

The current Republicans, who failed to repeal Obamacare, who embraced Juneteenth, and whose legislative votes are decided by Collins, wouldn’t even begin to abolish the progressive state, at least according to what clues we can glean from their abysmal track records. Abolishing the progressive state would take either new actions by Republicans newly threatened with reelection defeats, or new Republicans elected in their places. 

Consider that Republican state legislators, all through the 2020 election, and even now, have done nothing effective to defend their constitutional duty to direct the manner of appointment of presidential electors. It would be one step up from this inaction, and another step up beyond that, for Republican state legislators to push back effectively against a progressive H.R.1/S.1 or H.R.4 statute that attempts to nationalize election law (right after 2020 election-safeguarding state laws were openly defied by state executives, state judges, and national judges). 

But then, desperate times do call for desperate measures. Also, current legislators can be voted out of office. 

Consider that a Republican president and Republican legislators, when most recently in power, tried to push through their own brand of Obamacare, ceded power to so-called “public health” bureaucrats who proceeded to disrupt the use of the existing antiviral medications hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, and passed massive “stimulus” bills. It would be something new for a Republican president and Republican legislators to repeal and not replace Progressive orders adopting critical race theory racist socialism and green energy socialism, and a step far beyond that for these Republicans to also repeal long-standing progressive edifices. 

Despite the majority-Progressive histories of current Republicans, Sinema is right to fear that an opposition could one day rise up. 

In reality, the very thing that would push an opposition to rise up the fastest would be for the current opposition-in-name-only Republicans to be deprived of their go-to rationalization for not taking constitutional action: the filibuster. 

Arguably, the filibuster is unconstitutional. It unconstitutionally treats 40 minority votes as equivalent to 60 majority votes. It unconstitutionally deprives vice presidents of their power to cast tie-breaking votes. It defies these rules in the Constitution, which is the nation’s supreme law, and elevates the Senate’s rules, which are inferior to the supreme law. 

In practice, the filibuster ratchets into place the progressive state. 

Constitutionalists should take every opportunity to eliminate this ratchet, and let the chips fall where they may in the near term. Freedom will rise back as strong as ever.


Rise of the Homeschool Mom

 


Article by Kathleen Bustamante in The American Conservative


Rise of the Homeschool Mom

The lockdowns have encouraged the renaissance of family-provided education.

Over a year has passed since millions of Americans were thrust into the unfamiliar territory of homeschooling, transforming parents into educators overnight. For many, the role of educator lasted an entire school year in districts across the country, thus turning our collective assumption about homeschooling on its head. 

I, too, was plunged into the role of homeschool educator when the pandemic reached my home state of Oregon. I struggled to balance my jobs as freelance writer and college writing instructor with educating a first grader and a fifth grader. Minimal contact with my children’s teachers who were equally unprepared for a global pandemic required patience and flexibility on my part.

Our family survived the spring, but as fall 2020 crept closer, I realized Oregon schools would remain virtual for the foreseeable future. So, I decided to invest in a homeschool curriculum and serve as their primary educator. The decision was a terrifying one. Although I am a teacher by profession, my only classroom experience has been among adults. I felt ill-equipped to teach my own children; still, I joined the throngs of Americans who pulled their kids from traditional school to give homeschooling a try.  

Additionally, I signed up for two weekly homeschool cooperatives. These experiences forever changed my perspective on the intelligence and abilities of homeschool parents who provide a top-notch education for their children. 

The U.S. Census Bureau reports that homeschooling more than doubled in 2020, and that “those who increased home-schooling spanned across all demographics. Notably, among Black households, the proportion of home-schooling increased slightly more than five-fold, from 3.3 percent to 16.1 percent within a three-to five-month time span.” 

These statistics worry some including Elizabeth Bartholet, a Wasserstein public interest professor of law and faculty director of the Law School’s Child Advocacy Program. In June 2020, a Harvard Magazinearticle quoted Bartholet who claims that “Only about a dozen states have rules about the level of education needed by parents who homeschool.” She adds, “That means, effectively, that people can homeschool who’ve never gone to school themselves, who don’t read or write themselves.” She also asserts that “surveys of homeschoolers show that a majority of such families (by some estimates, up to 90 percent) are driven by conservative Christian beliefs and seek to remove their children from mainstream culture.”

After participating in homeschool co-ops over the past year, I would argue that Bartholet’s assertions couldn’t be less accurate.

According to a 2017 report by the National Center for Education Statistics, “the highest percentage of homeschooled students had parents who said that a concern about the environment of other schools, such as safety, drugs, or negative peer pressure was one reason to homeschool (80 percent).” The next highest percentage of parents surveyed (34 percent) were concerned about the environment of other schools. Seventeen percent reported dissatisfaction with academic instruction at other schools. And 16 percent chose homeschooling to provide religious instruction to their kids.

A study published in 2019 by the same agency shows that in a survey of homeschool parents between 2012 and 2016, the highest number of homeschool educators had a vocational/technical or some college background. The next largest group of homeschool educators possessed a bachelor’s or higher degree. This study suggests that homeschool parents are not the uneducated, survivalist types Bartholet warns of in her article, and while Bartholet’s statement that “people can homeschool who’ve never gone to school themselves, who don’t read or write themselves” is technically possible, statistics do not support her claims. 

My involvement with various homeschool communities has exposed me to intelligent and motivated supermoms who miraculously manage to oversee the education of their children while running a household—an impressive feat. Another shocker: not only are these women educated, some even juggle careers in their fields while teaching their kids. 

Leila Lopes has four children between the ages of ten and two months old and she recently finished her fourth year homeschooling her oldest two. She is also a registered nurse of 14 years and is specially trained in oncology nursing. She recognizes that her degree and career in healthcare have aided in her homeschool journey, noting, “Anatomy and Physiology is my favorite subject at home. I can share my knowledge as a nurse and help the kids understand how our bodies work. I can share examples of patients I have cared for that have had pathologies of various body systems. I think it helps the kids understand the practical implications of illness or injury to our health and how that plays out in real life.”

Another mother of four, Alex Tarpo, began homeschooling her oldest child, who is seven years old, as a result of the pandemic. Tarpo holds a Bachelor’s of Science and a Doctorate in Physical Therapy and says she recognizes the ways her education and experience have benefitted her in educating her children, but she also finds that being well-rounded not only in knowledge, but also in her faith, makes her a strong educator: “ultimately my science-based knowledge and learned work ethic will help in aiding my children to learn certain subjects and concepts, as well as skills and techniques for success.”

As homeschooling becomes more normalized in American society, parents realize they are already equipped with the tools necessary to teach their children because of their educational background or experience. 

Brianne Happel, director of a Classical Conversations homeschool community in Tigard, Oregon, and a decade-long homeschool educator, says she knows homeschool moms who currently work in their degree fields while also homeschooling their kids and that real-world, hands-on experience impacts their educational abilities while teaching their children. She states, [block/]Any experience we have as humans impacts what we impart to others. Our careers, our interactions with neighbors, dealing with our aging parents; we cannot compartmentalize the various circles of our lives; they all intersect. The working homeschool moms I know have to carefully manage their time. They also spend more time experiencing the very thing they are often aspiring to change. They want their children to become adults who can thrive in various situations, who can think for themselves and think well, who love to learn and tackle new challenges.[/block]

School districts and teacher unions are beginning to grasp the ramifications of slipping control. Attacks on Christian homeschoolers are on the rise as many families exchange traditional schools for nontraditional education. A Huffington Post article by Senior Editor Rebecca Klein equates Christian homeschoolers with “white Christian nationalists,” claiming language in some curriculum popular among Christian homeschoolers “overlaps with the rhetoric of Christian nationalism, often with overtones of nativism, militarism and racism as well.”

Happel calls these attacks absurd. She notes, “they are trying to evoke an emotional response in their readers based on a false and predetermined view of homeschoolers. There is a substantial and growing population of homeschooling families today, all unique, with vastly different beliefs and reasons for why they homeschool. Sure, there are probably people who fit into their pigeonhole, but there are likely just as many or more of those ‘extreme religious ideologues’ promoting bad ideas in private and government schools alike.” She adds, “I know none of these characters. As a Classical Conversations director, my mission is to help parents educate their children to become life-long learners. To experience the world around them as a classroom where the end of learning could never possibly be reached. Our goal is to teach children how to think, not what to think. Can the government schools today say the same for their educational goals?” 

The perception by critics that homeschool parents are uneducated, homogenous extremists was toppled over the past year. In fact, according to Brian D. Ray of the National Home Education Research Institute: “Homeschooling is quickly growing in popularity among minorities. About 41% of homeschool families are non-white/non-Hispanic (i.e., not white/Anglo).” 

Although many mothers choose not to work, instead focusing solely on educating their children, the reality is that homeschooling is no longer an either-or situation, nor is it a subpar education mill fabricating miniature white supremacists or Christian nationalists. 

Perhaps the truth behind claims made by homeschooling critics like Bartholet and Klein stems from the threat public schools face as parents finally recognize facts. Public schools no longer simply teach reading, writing, and arithmetic. Instead they indoctrinate children through critical race theory and have begun grooming them as early as kindergarten through comprehensive sexual education. Another possible reason for resistance by homeschooling critics results from parents observing firsthand America’s failing public school system, while homeschoolers consistently score higher than their public school counterparts in standardized testing.  

While COVID-19 disrupted the lives of millions, it also delivered a surprising blessing. Thanks to the pandemic, the shift from parental observers to at-home educators has illuminated the innate ability of parents to effectively teach their children well and produce a new generation of intelligent, capable human beings. Rather than creating the “white Christian nationalists” and “extreme religious ideologues” that homeschooling opponents desperately fear, parents are taking back control of their children’s education to produce critical thinkers and the future leaders that our country desperately needs.  

 

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/rise-of-the-homeschool-mom/





Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage