With Joe Biden in the White House you can expect to hear the name “Blackrock” in the headlines connected to a variety of issues from real estate purchasing to green energy projects with massive domestic and international investments.
BlackRock, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries) is a massive publicly traded multinational investment firm with over $8.68 trillion in assets under management [December 31, 2020 financial statement] in more than 100 countries across the globe. To say that Blackrock is invested in globalism, climate change and leftist politics, would be a severe understatement {See Here}. Larry Fink is the CEO and people like Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton’s attorney of record, are on the board.
Inside BlackRock there is a division called the BlackRock Investment Institute (BII) {See Here}.
Essentially the role of the BII is to tell BlackRock what is going to happen around the globe, and be the tip-of-the-spear in directing BlackRock where to invest money by predicting political events.
The Chairman of the BlackRock Investment Institute is Tom Donilon, President Obama’s former National Security Advisor (before Susan Rice), and a key advisor to Joe Biden throughout his career in politics.
You cannot get more deeply connected in the swamp financial schemes than Tom Donilon.
Donilon has been in/around government for 35+ years, deeply connected. Before joining the Obama administration Donilon was a registered lobbyist from 1999 through 2005 for O’Melvney & Myers. {Bio Here} Tom’s sole client was Fannie Mae. Fannie Mae is a government-backed private corporation that sells mortgages to investors.
Donilon took the lobbying gig because he was previously Executive Vice President for Law and Policy at Fannie Mae where he was responsible for Fannie Mae’s legal, regulatory, government affairs, and public policy issues. Tom Donilon’s BlackRock Biography reads like a who’s-who of connections to the swamp {READ HERE}
Here’s where it really gets interesting.
♦Tom Donilon’s brother, Mike Donilon is a Senior Advisor to Joe Biden {link} providing guidance on what policies should be implemented within the administration. Mike Donilon guides the focus of spending, budgets, regulation and white house policy from his position of Senior Advisor to the President.
♦Tom Donilon’s wife, Catherine Russell, is the White House Personnel Director {link}. In that position Donilon’s wife controls every hire in the Office of the Presidency.
♦Tom Donilon’s daughter, Sarah Donilon, who graduated college in 2019, now works on the White House National Security Council {link}
So let me just summarize this…. The Chairman of the BlackRock Investment Institute, the guy who tells the $8.7 trillion investment firm BlackRock where to put their money, has a brother who is the Senior Advisor to Joe Biden; has a wife who is the White House Personnel Director; and has a daughter who is now on the National Security Council.
Put another way… Tom Donilon’s literal job description for BlackRock is to: “leverage the firm’s expertise and generate proprietary research to provide insights on the global economy, markets, geopolitics and long-term asset allocation,” and his wife is in charge of White House personnel, his brother is Senior Advisor to the President, and his daughter is on the National Security Council.
You seeing this? Conflicts and insider information much?
The only thing missing is Hunter Biden being moved to the BlackRock board.
Now, I say again:.
Watch Where “BlackRock” and Biden Put Their Money…
A black man went on a multistate shooting spree last weekend. The suspected gunman, Justin Tyran Williams,said he specifically targeted white men in his rampage that left five wounded. “Basically, [Williams] explained throughout his life, specifically white males had taken from him, and also what he described as military-looking white males had taken from him,” Columbus (Georgia) Police detective Brandon Lockhart testified Monday.
A racially motivated mass shooting would be the number one news story on CNN . . . were the races reversed. But a black man intentionally shooting white men is just not that interesting to those outside of conservative media.
One could dwell on the lack of coverage or how it’s closer to the average mass shooting than the stereotype pushed by the media. (The majority of mass shooters are actually black.) But the most heinous aspect about this crime is the shooter’s motivation. It would be easy to dismiss it as the fixation of one deranged individual. Antiwhite resentment, however, is actively encouraged by the prevailing ideology in our schools and institutions. Critical race theory wants all of its adherents to think the same way as Justin Tyran Williams.
Most likely, Williams didn’t learn his violent hatred from critical race theory or in school. But it can’t be denied that CRT teaches that white men take everything from nonwhites and the reason why minorities fail is due to white supremacy. It encourages its adherents to hate whites and possibly even wish violence upon them.
Just take a gander at the latest examples of antiwhite racism promoted by our institutions. The Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, a respected outlet in the field of psychology,published an article that claimed “whiteness” is “a malignant, parasitic-like condition” that effectively turns its white hosts into “perverse” monsters who attack non-whites. The article grimly concludes that there is no “permanent cure” for this condition.
Last week, a Fairfax County, Virginia school board membertold graduating high school seniors that they must wage “jihad” against the world of “white supremacy” that surrounds them.
The prestigious Spence School in New York Cityshows middle schoolers videos that humiliate and mock white women as racist “Karens,” further encouraging racial animus among minorities and racial guilt among whites.
Portland, Oregon-area schools (among many others)teach students that whites are born “racist,” America was built on “white supremacy, institutional racism, racial hierarchy, and oppression,” and that students must become revolutionaries to take down this racist system. Needless to say, much of the curriculum in these schools centers on the apparent atrocities committed by all white people, from colonialism to redlining. The impression given of whites is not a kind one.
There are even respectable people who openly share Williams’ murderous fantasies. Psychiatrist Aruna Khilananidelivered a Yale lecture in April on “The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind.” In the speech, she vented about how whites make her blood boil and how evil they are for simply existing. She even shared this daydream with her audience: “I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body, and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step. Like I did the world a fucking favor.” In a subsequent interview, Khilanani said minorities need to be more racist towards whites. She also said in that same interview that her lecture was well-received by the Yale audience.
There is some controversy over whether state-taught racial grievance will lead to violence. Both sides in this dispute agree that CRT is bad, but differ as to the extent of its consequences. Commentator James Lindsay recently suggested that CRT teaching would lead to real-world violence against white people. That suggestion drew the ire of Quillette editor Claire Lehmann, who said it amounted to “White Genocide Theory” and would lead to white violence against non-whites.
But Lindsay has the better part of the argument in this dispute. People who are told that a certain group of people did terrible things to their ancestors and continue to oppress them will come to hate that specific group. They may even entertain violence against that enemy class, especially if things go wrong in their own lives. Who better than “whitey” to blame for all of life’s misfortunes?
Critical race theory isn’t just bad because it diminishes education and critical thinking—it’s downright evil because it encourages racial prejudice against whites. And it’s not hard to see a connection between state-sanctioned hate and actual violence. When every kid is taught that whites are evil people, unfairly hoarding power and wealth, you can expect more anti-white mass shooters.
The conservation body said other nurses were also identified as a result.
The
photos featured in an episode of the long-running BBC programme that
was filmed at the English Heritage site in Silsoe in 2018.
No formal records exist of the hundreds of nurses who worked there.
English
Heritage said Wrest Park was believed to have been the first wartime
country house hospital and it operated from 1914 until a fire forced its
closure in 1916.
In September, Ms Jephson told the charity she had identified her relative as she watched the Canadian broadcast.
"During their discussion about the history of Wrest Park, I was very surprised to see a photo of my grandmother," she said.
"It
is wonderful that my grandmother's collection will now also become part
of the archive and it is especially lovely that several other nurses
will be recognised as well."
Ms
Jephson also shared the contents of her grandmother's autograph book
with English Heritage, which included information about wounds and
personal messages.
One
soldier wrote Ms Buller a poem on 9 November 1915, which described her
as being "as sweet as sugar" and her presence as "a pleasure".
Andrew
Hann, English Heritage lead properties historian, said the women had
been "forgotten", but they were "the backbone of the hospital and a
crucial part of the war effort".
"Being able to identify Olive Buller and others helps us better understand life at Wrest Park during the war," he said.
"It's incredible we've found these answers all the way across the Atlantic and we're grateful to Carol for coming forward."
We have a cultural imperative to teach boys how to be men, but we have just as much need to teach girls what masculinity looks like, and to respect and expect it from the men in their lives.
When I read “To Kill A Mockingbird” for the first time — and every time since — I invariably pictured my father as Atticus Finch. It didn’t hurt that he’s a lawyer and looks like Gregory Peck, with glasses, determined features, and dark hair falling over his forehead. But the resemblance was deeper.
After I read of how Atticus gently sat Scout down on the porch swing and explained our imperfect world to her childish ears, I thought of each time my dad would do the same when I discovered some new hurt or crisis. His explanations of the deep obligations of integrity sounded like the heartfelt lessons in which my dad explained to me the importance of doing what’s right.
Like my dad, Atticus was enduringly wise and capable of solving anything. He carried the weight of the world on his shoulders, in the selfless hope of making it better for his children.
It’s easy to idolize your parents as a child, and of course no one is flawless. But as an adult, I continue to look up to my dad greatly. He taught me about the world, and about the integrity and sacrifice necessary to live well in it. In doing so, he also taught me, his daughter, a great deal about manhood.
It’s been observed plenty that the American leftist cultural narrative doesn’t teach boys what they should be learning about manhood. It goes without saying that teaching boys how to be good men is an indispensable part of a flourishing society.
But the public sphere’s masculinity vacuum hurts girls too. Women have no shortage of interactions with men — we marry them, work with them, go to church with them, grow up with them, and raise them. We have a cultural imperative to teach boys how to be men, but we have just as much need to teach girls what masculinity looks like, and to expect it from the men in their lives.
My dad taught me to respect and expect integrity, sacrifice, and wisdom from men. A man worth his salt doesn’t let fear or pressure intimidate him out of doing the right thing, condemning evil, or standing up for those who can’t defend themselves.
Through his example of going to a taxing and wearisome job every day, then coming home to help my mom with dinner, fix a broken sink, or work in the yard, my dad showed me good men make sacrifices. Women aren’t exempt from the obligation to live sacrificially too, of course. But what separates men from boys (and women from girls) is an eager and persistent decision to place others’ needs above their own. To listen patiently even after a long day, to place duty above pleasure, and to do so out of love.
As he’s made those sacrifices, my dad has also shown me how much a man should value his family. He and my mom have cultivated our family as a great source and depository for each other’s encouragement, support, fun, and rest.
I’ve also learned from watching him that manhood includes a strong sense of duty. In high school, my favorite thing to watch with Dad was HBO’s “Band of Brothers,” and each episode prompted deep discussions about duty and leadership. Out of a sense of sacred obligation to God, loved ones, and country flow daily sacrifices and the motivation to continue them. Inseparable from that duty, too, is a strong sense of loyalty toward those to whom love obligates you.
Dad also instilled in me that men should be — and women should appreciate them being — capable. From knowing political and historical details to being able to change a tire or fix things around the house with his hands, I could always trust his expertise. When I was little, he was the one who could make my skinned knees magically better through a sly or funny change of subject I didn’t even realize had happened.
Not all men have to be history buffs or amateur carpenters, of course, but there is something deeply admirable about being a capable and knowledgeable problem-solver. For all of the elite sneers about “mansplaining,” capability is a quality we should be careful not to devalue.
So is wisdom. Problem-solving isn’t limited to fixing appliances. It also includes thoughtful insight and discerning counsel. As a woman, there are few virtues I’ve learned to admire more in men than good judgment and its wise application.
I also learned from my dad to expect, but also earn, respect. He took me on daddy-daughter dates and always opened the door for me. I remember him making a special point to dance with me at my cousin’s wedding when I was little. From preschool to my professional life, he has always celebrated my victories but never let me be complacent with success or gave empty praise.
There’s plenty more to admire about my dad, like the matchless sense of style he’s sported since the 1980s. But as he’s helped teach me to be a principled and well-rounded person — and thus a better woman — he’s also shown me what strong masculinity looks like. His example has equipped me to expect and celebrate genuine masculinity in my own friendships and interactions. And more than anything, it prompts me to be grateful for such an exemplar — this Father’s Day and every day.
American-born William Joyce, AKA Lord Haw-Haw, Nazi radio propagandist
Article by Clarice Feldman in The American Thinker
There’s Nothing New About the Effort to Propagandize the Military
More years ago than I care to remember, I was a college intern
working on Capitol Hill. As part of our experience, various members of
Congress came to speak to us. One of them as I recall was Strom
Thurmond, at that time the Democratic senator from South Carolina, and a
strong segregationist. He was pushing his plan to propagandize the
military in something he called “Americanism.” Most of the interns in my
class were well-socialized kids from northeast colleges like Yale and
Mount Holyoke and such and they listened politely without objection. I
wasn’t. I said I could understand how you could propagandize Soviet
troops in Marxism, but except for basic civics lessons, there was such a
broad range of views on what were the appropriate policies to follow,
it seemed to me that what he was really promoting was a plan to convert
the military to his own political views. He was angered by the dissent
and said he thought there probably were far left people in that very
room, glaring at me when he said it. In any event his plan failed. (The
next near brush I had with him was when we moved into a cooperative
apartment building where both he and Hubert Humphrey were also owners.
The first day we moved in I was taken aside by the older women
residents. ”Never get into an elevator with Strom, they warned.”)
At the moment, under claims of diversity
and using the preposterous Critical Race Theory, this administration is
trying to propagandize the military, and it is clear the plan is to
demonize Donald J. Trump, Republicans, and white people. And while it
looks momentarily like they are succeeding in this plan, there is every
evidence that Americans will not put up with this much longer. There’s
good reason not to. It’s impossible to imagine anything more likely to
destroy the cohesion military operations need to succeed. Nor can I see
how any program can do more to destroy the morale of the troops than
this does.
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin III is at the top of
the pyramid and a look at his policies is enough to see that he is
misguided and presents a real danger to national security. The point of a
military is to defend the country, and it boggles the mind to conceive
of any way such divisive pap as Critical Race Theory can encourage men
and women to risk their lives to defend a country which your commanders
portray to you as a racist hellhole. David Horowitz at Frontpage magazine has published a thorough article on Austin, his views, and his appointees working to carry out such a repulsive plot.
Secretary
Austin’s appointment of Bishop Garrison to head the newly created
Countering Extremism Working Group is a major giveaway. As Horowitz
reports:
In July 2019, for example, Garrison said in
a tweet: “Support for him [Trump], a racist, is support for ALL his
beliefs. He’s dragging a lot of bad actors (misogynist, extremists,
other racists) out into the light, normalizing their actions. If you
support the President, you support that.” “There is no room for nuance
with this,” Garrison added. “There is no more ‘but I’m not like that’
talk.” This is the man in charge of purifying our military.
Austin's decision to appoint Garrison to head the CEWG is
even more significant in light of the fact that Garrison is a vocal
supporter of the 1619 Project. Garrison put forth a passionate defense of the 1619 Project in an August 2019 essay in which he wrote that
America's “hatred of communities of color and other vulnerable groups”
is “deeply rooted in slavery, the treatment of African slaves, and the
continued struggle of the black American community for equal treatment.”
No acknowledgement, of course, of the tremendous contributions to
racial equality for blacks in the founders’ declaration of equality for
all, the ultimate sacrifices made by President Lincoln and 350,000 Union
soldiers to free the slaves, or the white majorities in Congress who
passed the Civil Rights Acts. Instead: “Now, arguably more than at any
time in recent history, we need to recognize that extremism, racist
policies, and white supremacy stand as existential threats not only to
American life but to the future of our country and others around the
globe,” added Garrison. No evidence needed of racist policies of white
supremacy or the “existential threats” they are alleged to pose to
America and the globe.
Austin has already purged hundreds of Trump appointees
from Pentagon advisory boards and panels. He believes, says Horowitz,
that racism is America’s most “salient and enduring feature.” His
emphasis on purging extremists from the military merits consideration of
what he considers “extremist,” and a close look indicates “the scary
catch-all term “extremist” refers not to Islamic fundamentalists or
Antifa anarchists or pro-Chinese infiltrators (none of whom the current
administration regards as a national security problem) but to the 75+
million supporters of former President Trump, Republicans, and anyone
who resists the anti-white racism currently rampant in our political
discourse.”
When Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier, commander
of a critical squadron of the U.S. Space Force, warned that Marxism
and critical race theory (which after all is simply Marxism that
replaces class with race as the boogeyman) was gaining a foothold in the
military and “would erode the trust and confidence these young people
have in their country and in the Constitution,’ he was removed from that
post.
Two members of Congress have pushed back: Senator Tom
Cotton (R-AR) and Congressman Jim Banks (R-IN). Cotton reported to
Austin that he’d received several hundred whistleblower complaints
concerning the propagandizing about systematic racism and fake history,
reports about “plummeting morale, growing mistrust between the races and
the sexes … and unexpected separations and retirements
based on these training alone.” Austin tried to sidestep that with
pablum about diversity and Cotton wasn’t buying it. ”This is not about
diversity in general, though. This is about a very specific kind of
anti-American indoctrination that it sweeping into some parts of our
military…”
In like manner, Jim Banks
tore into Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday for
recommending to every sailor a book by Ibram X. Kendi (previously known
as Henry Rogers) on Critical Race Theory in which he contends you can
either be a racist or an anti-racist and to be an anti-racist you have
to follow his directives.
I don’t want to get on too much of a
bandwagon about this, but when Gilday insists that making it the policy
of the US Navy to allow officers, petty officers, and sailors to be
degraded and humiliated based on race will create a stronger and more
cohesive force, he is either mentally deranged (I’m open to that
excuse), trying to gaslight Congress and the American people and the
Navy, or indulging in recreational pharmacology. Or any combination
thereof. You can’t expect sailors who’ve been forced to sit through the
bullsh** Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity classes (they aren’t called
DIE for nothing) to work together cooperatively or to socialize off duty
or to even care about the service that is telling them that their worth
is limited to their skin color and sexual preferences and preferred
pronouns.
l’l leave the last words on this to be the salty Kurt Schlichter.
Everyone hates CRT, critical race theory, that bizarre, ridiculous,
and morally illiterate hodge-podge of Marxist mumbo-jumbo blended with a
healthy dose of the kind of racial hash that would make Democrat David
Duke beam. Even the lib wine moms, who were so ecstatic about the recent
lack of mean tweeting -- ironic that the only man able to give them
pleasure was Donald Trump, and he does it by not doing anything
-- despise this Marxist pestilence. The guys in the campaign business I
talk to are giddy and often burst into spontaneous jigs of pure glee at
the poll numbers they are seeing. Hey Congress, congratulations! Thanks
to CRT, there’s something America hates even more than you! [snip] We
conservatives should actually be glad about the left’s CRT fetish. After
all, these dummies have handed us a giant Louisville Slugger to use to
pummel them. The best part is that they are surprised we’re upset. Maybe
they should get out more. Maybe they should meet some normal people.
And it’s not just normal people of pallor who are on their last nerve.
It’s all sorts of normal people - black, white, yellow, brown, whatever,
united in their refusal to hate their neighbors in order to provide a
short-term political edge to a pack of elite fools and scammers. It’s
not merely that normal people understand that Balkanization leads to the
Balkans, and that the Balkans are not a role model (I was there – trust
me, you do not want a society where ethnicity is everything). It’s that
normal people know that this is evil, that to judge one by the color of
his skin instead of the content of his character is un-American and
un-Judeo-Christian, and probably un-every other religion except Marxism.
I’d be ashamed that some in our society were drawn toward the siren
song of bigotry if I wasn’t so proud of my countrymen for so
overwhelmingly rejecting hate in favor of truth, liberty, and
Americanism.
Schlichter and I are not the only ones sensing a strong
pushback against this obviously hateful drive to divide us. Over at the
NY Post, Glenn Reynolds details the tide turning against the woke idiocy including CRT and defunding the police.
Parents
are joining together to fight it in schools and even late-night comics
are decrying it. Let’s hope that it is as disastrous to the Democrats
2022 dreams as I think it will be
The Lawfare activists are screaming foul because the Arizona Senate is not turning over documents from ongoing investigative measures taking place during the audit of Maricopa County. The group known as American Oversight is a Lawfare group working on behalf of the DNC and allied left-wing activists. They have filed suit against the Arizona senate trying to find evidence they can use to marginalize the audit before the findings are made public.
Seemingly pretending not to know about the separation of power between the state legislative body and the state judicial branch, the activists are filing suits to get access to the evidence in an ongoing Senate investigation. Essentially, this is akin to demanding to sue for legislative content before the Senate can create the law and/or the harm from that law.
It is a clear Lawfare fishing expedition.
Remember, in order for far-left ideologues to advance their ideology, and/or ideological narratives, they must pretend not to know things. Another way to look at this is the Arizona Senate subpoena -which initiated the audit- is akin to an ongoing investigation. The Lawfare group are trying to get custody of details of the investigative techniques being used (forensic audit) in order to undermine the investigation itself.
To advance this narrative the leftists are using another Alinsky maneuver: “make your opposition live up to their own rules”. The Lawfare tribe is accusing the Arizona Senate of not being transparent in their process.
An easy smack-down (with a current familiarity) would be to juxtapose this Lawfare demand against the House Judiciary Committee as they worked to assemble the articles of impeachment behind closed doors. The leftist tribe would clutch their pearls if anyone sued them to find out in advance what details were being assembled in the articles before they were made public…. but that’s essentially what their demand is in Arizona.
PHOENIX — Senate President Karen Fann is taking the position that Arizona courts cannot force her or any other member of the Arizona Legislature to comply with the state’s Public Records Act.
In a new court filing, attorney Kory Langhofer, who represents the Prescott Republican and the entire Senate, is asking Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Michael Kemp to throw out a claim by a self-described nonpartisan watchdog group to get access to all documents and materials related to the Senate’s audit of the 2020 election results.
The Senate has, or will produce documents in its possession, Langhofer said. Ditto with those in the possession of Ken Bennett, who was tapped by Fann to be her liaison with Cyber Ninjas, the private company hired to conduct the audit. The only exception, Langhofer said, are those documents protected as privileged or confidential.
He said, though, what American Oversight wants are documents that are in the hands of Cyber Ninjas or other companies it has, in turn, hired as subcontractors. Langhofer said the Public Records Act does not apply to private companies. And he rejected arguments by attorney Roopali Desai that the records are public because the only reason Cyber Ninjas got the materials in the first place was because they were subpoenaed by the Senate.
But Langhofer has a backup legal argument just in case the judge does not read the scope of the Public Records Act as narrowly as he does. He told Kemp he has no jurisdiction in the fight.
The Arizona law spells out that public records and other matters in the custody of any officers “shall be open to inspection by any person at all times during office hours.” Langhofer concedes that the Senate is a “public body” and lawmakers are “public officers” who, in any other circumstance, would be covered by the law. Only thing is, he said, they are not subject to it.
“The Arizona Constitution entrusts each house of the Legislature plenary power to order its own internal procedures and affairs,” Langhofer wrote. (read more)
Despite many people thinking an audit in Pennsylvania would be too difficult to initiate the State Senate Chairman of the Government Committee, Dave Argall, has said an audit is “a very real possibility” after hearing from residents and constituents.
PENNSYLVANIA – The Pennsylvania state Senate committee chair in charge of overseeing elections said a forensic audit was a “very real possibility” Thursday after meeting with activists Wednesday.
Senate State Government Committee Chairman Dave Argall, R-Schuylkill, told the Capital-Star that he was considering subpoenas for ballot information, but had not considered which jurisdictions would be subpoenaed yet. “There are a lot of things under consideration right now, and I told them to check back in a week or two and we hope to have some more detail,” Argall told the Capital-Star of the meeting. (READ MORE)
This will not please U.S. Attorney Merrick Garland who has announced his intention to double the number of lawyers in the DOJ Civil Rights Division (hired from Lawfare ranks) to fight any effort to reveal election fraud.
If fully exposed, the globalists will declare Martial Law to smear Americans and protect their power
Article by Wayne Allyn Root in Townhall
What Difference Does Proving a Stolen Election Make? All the Difference in the World
Remember that famous Hillary Clinton line about Benghazi? She asked,
"What difference does it make?" She meant it's over; it's old news; why
rehash it now? Nothing will change. Of course, that was convenient for
Clinton and former President Barack Obama. They lied, and heroes died at
Benghazi. The last thing Clinton or Obama wanted was an investigation.
Democrats
are saying the same thing now about the 2020 election. They say: "What
difference does it make? Donald Trump lost. It's over. The election is
certified. Joe Biden is the president. Nothing will change. You're all
wasting your time." Again, that's pretty convenient.
We are a
nation of laws. That's what made America the greatest nation in world
history. Without laws, investigations, arrests and convictions, we might
as well be Haiti, or Cuba, or Venezuela, or Zimbabwe, or Mexico or any
other lawless socialist hellhole around the world. Where people live in
misery and malaise, with no rights, while the government, despots and
ruthless criminals do whatever they want to the people.
We are America. We can't let that happen. We must investigate and pursue justice, no matter where it leads.
Forensic
audits will uncover the truth. And the truth will set us free. The
truth will prove -- even to Democrats and dummies (I know, I repeat
myself) -- that we were right. Trump was cheated. The election was
rigged and stolen. Trump is the real president. Biden is not the
rightful president of the United States.
You can feel it. The tide has turned. We are so close to
proving Arizona and Georgia were stolen. Some legislators from other
states want to plan forensic audits. Soon all the dominoes will fall.
Proving
the election was stolen will make all the difference in the world. Of
course, Democrats and the fake news media frauds know that. That's
precisely what they're so afraid of. They're scared to death the truth
is about to come out.
And yes, they're scared to death because
they don't know where this will lead; they don't know what the citizens
will do once they realize the election was rigged and stolen.
Democrats
will say it's too late. They will argue: "Nothing can be done. Stolen
election or not, Biden is president, end of story. Tough luck." I'm not
an elections lawyer or a constitutional scholar. I'll leave the question
of whether Trump can be reinstated as president up to legal experts.
But
I know this: Bad things will happen to the Democrats if it's proven
they stole the election. All hell will break loose. Democrats are in a
world of trouble, and they know it.
On the minor scale, here's some of the things I could imagine happening next:
Once
we can prove the election was stolen, Democrats are finished. This is
like when a famous business mogul and philanthropist is found to be a
criminal who stole everyone's money. Ask Bernie Madoff. Everyone hates
you for the rest of all time. You can never walk out of your home again.
You can't show your face in public. People scream "shame" at you
wherever you go. Your legacy is destroyed forever.
Lawsuits will fly. Legal fees will cripple the Biden administration and the Democratic Party. Donations will dry up.
Biden
will be the lame duck of all lame ducks. He will never pass another
piece of legislation. He won't be able to leave the White House. He
might as well be a convicted criminal. The White House will be his
prison cell.
Republicans will win a landslide in 2022. The GOP
will control both houses of Congress. Even voters who don't like Trump
will feel guilty that his presidency was stolen. Trump will be a lock to
win back the presidency in 2024.
That's all separate from massive protests, million-man-marches on
Washington, unrest, civil disobedience and the prospect of 74 million
Trump voters withholding taxes to bring the Biden government to its
knees and force Biden's resignation.
And then there are the
criminal charges. Thousands of Democrats were involved, in multiple
states, in the greatest theft in America's history. I call this treason.
That's life in prison, or worse. This won't end well for Democrats.
So, now you know why they're panicking. Wouldn't you?
So,
yes, proving the election was stolen is the whole ball of wax. It's the
whole kitchen sink. It changes both the history and the future of
America.
God bless the forensic audits. And God help the Democrats when the American people see proof the election was stolen.
Inside BlackRock there is a division called the BlackRock Investment Institute (BII) {See Here}.
Seemingly pretending not to know about the separation of power between the state legislative body and the state judicial branch, the activists are filing suits to get access to the evidence in an ongoing Senate investigation. Essentially, this is akin to demanding to sue for legislative content before the Senate can create the law and/or the harm from that law.
PENNSYLVANIA
