Tuesday, May 18, 2021

Shawshank for January 6 Detainees

The government argues the events of January 6 along with the defendants’ skepticism about the outcome of the 2020 election are evidence the accused are a threat to society. 


I've been in solitary confinement for a hundred days now and haven’t been convicted of any crime with no end in sight.”

That was part of a lengthy message Jacob Lang sent to his father, Ned, the last week of April. Jacob was arrested on January 16 in New York and charged with several crimes related to his activity in Washington, D.C. on January 6. Lang, who turned 25 while incarcerated, is accused of assaulting police officers using a dangerous or deadly weapon. The government’s evidence against him appears to be strong. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

But Lang and dozens of January 6 defendants already have been convicted by Joe Biden’s Justice Department and sentenced by federal judges—presumed guilty until proven innocent—awaiting trials that won’t begin for months. It’s all part of what Attorney General Merrick Garland promised is his “top priority”—the sprawling investigation into the alleged insurrection—and what another top prosecutor boasted is the “shock and awe” campaign to punish Americans protesting the results of the 2020 presidential election.

So far, more than 400 people have been arrested in the nationwide manhunt with more charges to come, and at the same time, emerging evidence proves law enforcement allowed protestors to enter and remain in the building.

At the direction of Biden’s Justice Department, at least 50 defendants have been transported from their home states to a D.C. jail, a purely punitive move since all court hearings into the foreseeable future are virtual. In several cases, federal prosecutors successfully argued against release orders issued by local judges. The government repeatedly cites the overall events of January 6 in addition to the defendants’ skepticism about the outcome of the 2020 presidential election as evidence the accused are a threat to society.

“He armed himself and assaulted law enforcement with the intent to unlawfully enter the U.S. Capitol and stop the functioning of our government as it met to certify election results,” one assistant U.S. attorney wrote in the government’s pre-trial detention motion for Lang. “The defendant was a spoke in the wheel that caused the historic events of January 6, 2021, and he is thus a danger to our society and a threat to the peaceful functioning of our community.”

Of course, that sort of dramatic rhetoric has nothing to do with keeping people safe and everything to do with punishing law-abiding Americans who have the audacity to doubt the outcome of last year’s election. It’s guilt-by-association—anyone who supports Donald Trump is guilty of challenging the regime and must pay the price.

Which is why so many January 6 detainees now languish in solitary confinement conditions, some reportedly abused by prison guards, denied routine access to family members and defense attorneys. While there’s no doubt most of those behind bars awaiting delayed trials face the most serious charges related to the Capitol breach, the double standard of justice is in clear view. The same Justice Department dropping cases against Portland rioters, including those charged with assaulting federal officers, is treating January 6 defendants as hardened criminals even though most have no criminal records. 

Lang told his father his fellow detainees are being tortured “mentally, physically, socially, emotionally, legally, and spiritually.”

The jail allows them to leave their cells for an hour a day. Religious services are not allowed; they can’t exercise and access to personal hygiene such as showers is nearly nonexistent, according to defense lawyers and relatives I’ve spoken with. The detainees, before a single moment of their trial has begun, suffer the same harsh treatment as convicted criminals incarcerated in the D.C. prison system—pandemic-justified conditions recently condemned by elected officials of both parties. 

The treatment is so bad that the detainees have found advocates in two unlikely allies: Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Richard Durbin (D-Ill.). “Solitary confinement is a form of punishment that is cruel and psychologically damaging,” Warren told Politico last month. “And we’re talking about people who haven’t been convicted of anything yet.” Durbin expressed surprise at how the January 6 detainees were being held and urged progressives to “amplify their criminal justice reform calls even on behalf of Donald Trump supporters who besieged the entire legislative branch in January.”

When Richard Barnett, the man photographed in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office, finally was released from the D.C. jail after being held for nearly four months, the first thing he asked for was a nail clipper. “All the inmates had to share one nail clipper and it was never cleaned,” Barnett’s attorney, Steven Metcalf, told me. “He hadn’t cut his nails in four months.”

Barnett turned himself in to law enforcement after he arrived home to Arkansas on January 8; news photographers had been positioned inside Pelosi’s office to take pictures and the image of Barnett went viral immediately, leading to death threats against his family. Although he had no criminal history, D.C. District Court Judge Beryl Howell agreed with the government that Barnett was a danger to society. In addition to a few misdemeanor charges, he is accused of carrying—not using—a walking stick that can be used as a stun gun.

“Defendant’s involvement in the Capitol assault and brazen conduct inside the Capitol and offices of the Speaker of the House pose an obvious danger,” Howell wrote on January 29. “The court finds that the defendant poses a danger to the community because of his brazenly illegal conduct . . . and access to firearms and weapons, like a stun gun, that remain missing.” (Howell, a former Democratic Senate staffer and Obama appointee, has been a major Trump antagonist from the bench.)

Howell’s prejudicial conclusion that Barnett engaged in “illegal” activity based solely on the government’s initial evidence is just one example of how January 6 defendants are “being treated as though they’ve already been sentenced,” Metcalf said.

Prison guards “instill fear” in the detainees, Metcalf said. Ryan Samsel, behind bars since January, allegedly was beaten by prison guards who handcuffed him with zip ties. “He has definitely suffered serious injuries, including a shattered orbital floor, a broken orbital bone, his jaw was broken, his nose was broken,” his lawyer said in an interview last month. Samsel, she said, is currently unable to see out of his right eye and may permanently lose his vision.

Further, those held in the D.C. jail cannot participate in their own defense, a clear violation of basic constitutional protections.

“It’s impossible to have a free-flowing conversation with your clients,” Metcalf said. “Meetings are in open cages where there is no confidentiality, everyone can hear the conversations including prison guards.” If a detainee meets with a lawyer in person at the jail, he must then quarantine for 14 days as “retaliation,” Metcalf said. Attorney-client privilege is nonexistent.

The government, with the consent of federal judges as I wrote last week, is using every legal trick necessary to keep Capitol surveillance footage from January 6 under wraps from both defendants and legal counsel. The video captured by the Capitol’s security system and used against Lang and other defendants to support pretrial detention motions is considered “highly sensitive” and concealed by protective orders. Defendants only have access to the clips created by the Justice Department, not full recordings; the videos can be viewed in a supervised setting. Defendants and lawyers cannot download, copy, or share the clips.

Last week, Jacob Lang, according to a text message sent to his mother on Sunday, was placed in an empty cell for at least 14 hours as punishment for advising other detainees against accepting plea deals. (Only one person has so far accepted a plea arrangement. All other defendants have pleaded not guilty.) According to the message, shared by his father to me, Jacob had “no water, nothing in my cell, no chair to sit, no blanket, no Bible, no toothbrush, no toilet paper . . . and no human contact.” Jacob said the water is brown and comes out “in chunks.”

His next court hearing is June 15.

“They are literally torturing me exactly like they do to political prisoners in China,” he wrote his mother. “I’m a united states [sic] citizen and Constitutional patriot and they are . . . torturing me. I’m not even convicted of a crime!! This is how they treat ‘innocent until proven guilty people in America???”

Only, as Lang and his fellow detainees are learning the hard way, if you’re on the wrong side of American politics.


Janet Yellen Sells…

 Janet Yellen Sells Big Business on Big Government

The treasury secretary told the Chamber of Commerce that an activist government funded by higher corporate taxes would be a boon for business too.

|

reason-yellen

( CNP/AdMedia/Newscom) 

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen came out swinging against small government today in a speech intended to sell business leader on President Joe Biden's massive $2.3 trillion American Jobs Plan and the corporate tax hike that'll be needed to pay for it.

"For decades, the prevailing focus has been on the need to decrease and then limit the size of government as a share of the economy," said Yellen in remarks before the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. "This approach to U.S. fiscal policy, founded on a distrust of government motives and effectiveness, along with resistance to higher taxes, has had profound effects on our nation and our people."

Anyone paying attention to ever-growing federal spending and the national debt might be confused by the supposed era of fiscal restraint Yellen is describing.

Yellen concedes that spending on entitlements, like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, has only continued to grow, as has military spending. But increased largesse on those particular budget priorities, when combined with a supposed consensus about shrinking the size of government, says Yellen, means that "discretionary spending has been compressed as a consequence."

Yellen caveats this point, too, by saying that "exceptions have been made, most often in the form of temporary support for the economy following shocks and in times of recession."

Non-defense discretionary spending—which includes federal outlays for transportation, education, and low-income support programs—spiked in response to the Great Recession and, particularly, during the pandemic. In between these two crises, however, that particular slice of federal funding did fall to a post-1962 low when compared to the size of the overall economy, according to the progressive Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.

If one focuses just on non-defense discretionary spending part of the budget, it looks almost like we've been living in a small government paradise, argues Yellen, saying "ambitious and valuable initiatives like the Affordable Care Act engendered enough controversy to foreclose at that time the possibility of broadening the agenda."

Yellen goes on to list a number of ills resulting from this supposed fiscal restraint, including deteriorating, out-of-date infrastructure, an education system that hasn't kept up with technological change, and a lack of support services for families, including childcare. Big picture problems like economic inequality and climate change have only gotten worse in the absence of an activist, ever-growing government, she adds.

"That is why the President proposed the American Jobs Plan and the American Families Plan," says Yellen. "These policies will promote a dynamic economy with greater opportunity for workers, higher living standards, and, over time, reduced inequality."

The massive increase in federal spending envisioned in both plans—and the corporate tax increases the administration is pushing to pay for it—will also be a boon for business, Yellen told the chamber, saying, "We are confident that the investments and tax proposals in the Jobs Plan, taken as a package, will enhance the net profitability of our corporations and improve their global competitiveness."

The promise of increased corporate profitability is obviously a necessary ploy to get the business community on board with the Biden administration's agenda. Yellen went much further in her remarks by arguing for a permanent expansion of the size and scope of the federal government.

"It is the time to recommit our government to playing a more active and smarter role in the economy. The administration's planned actions are not fiscal stimulus in the way we have seen in the past," she said. "Nor are they intended to target a particular size of government."

Yellen's remarks fit squarely into what the Wall Street Journal's Greg Ip has termed "Bidenomics," which calls for massive federal spending aimed at reshaping the economy and society without heeding traditional concerns about inflation, deficits, and the potential "crowding out" of private investment.

Interestingly enough, the details of the American Jobs Plan fall short of the expansive vision Yellen outlined in her speech. Biden is relying on a corporate tax hike to cover the entirety of the $2.3 trillion in American Jobs Plan spending in an effort to keep his promise not to raise taxes on Americans making under $400,000 a year. To make that math work, the spending will have to sunset after eight years, while those corporate taxes will have to last for 15 years.

Yellen's remarks, however, seem to suggest that Biden's budget gimmickry has much more to do with political expediency than any real desire on the part of the administration to pay for its spending proposals or have them lapse eventually.

The era of small government has been over for a while. The only question now is what constraints government will impose on itself absent a healthy fear of excessive government debt.


Men Give Birth. America Was Founded in 1619. And Israel Is the Aggressor.


Article by Dennis Prager in Townhall


Men Give Birth. America Was Founded in 1619. And Israel Is the Aggressor.

When you meditate for a moment on what the left expects honest and decent people to believe, you confront the world of absurdities and lies in which we live.

The left demands we believe and announce that men menstruate and give birth and that it is in no way unfair to girls and women when biological men compete in girls' and women's sports.

In tens of thousands of American schools, students are brainwashed to believe that America was not founded in 1776 but in 1619, the year the first Africans were brought to North America as indentured servants or slaves. This is the "1619 Project" lie: It was labeled a lie by almost every leading historian of early America, many of whom are Democrats and liberals who supported the impeachment of former President Donald Trump.

And now, with Hamas -- a totalitarian theocratic Islamist terror group -- unleashing thousands of rockets on Israel's civilian population and Israel responding to this latest of repeated attempts at mass murder, the world's left demands that we believe Israel is the villain and Hamas is the victim.

The left's condemnation of Israel and sympathy for Hamas is just another example of the morally inverted world the left has constructed.

We live in a world in which the mass media and academia -- all nothing more than mouthpieces of the left -- repeatedly tell the world that America fought the Revolutionary War in order to preserve slavery, that men menstruate, and that Hamas is a victim of Israeli aggression.

How such gargantuan lies have become mainstream truths is a question for another column. Suffice it to say they are all as absurd as they are mendacious.

The reason there is a war right now between Israel and Hamas is that Israel exists. It has nothing to do with anything Israel has actually done. Hamas and its backers in Iran do not have disputes with Israel. They have a dispute with Israel's existence.

There is, therefore, nothing Israel can do that would satisfy its enemies except agree to destroy itself as the one Jewish state in the world.

For most (not all) Muslims and for most (not all) Muslim states and for the left, there is room in the world for 22 Arab countries and for more than 50 Muslim countries, but there is no room for one Jewish state, even one the size of New Jersey and smaller than El Salvador.

Hamas and its supporters in Iran regularly announce they seek Israel's destruction. There is no parallel to this in the world. No groups or nations seek the obliteration of any other nation in the world. This is in keeping with the history of anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism is not just another ethnic or racial bigotry. I wish it were. Anti-Semitism, unlike every other form of racism or ethnic bigotry, is exterminationist. Jew-haters don't merely hate Jews; they want Jews dead. That is one of the many reasons that every honest person understands that anti-Zionism is merely the latest expression of anti-Semitism. The anti-Zionist claim is that Israel's existence as a Jewish state is illegitimate.

Why do those on the left (again, as I always point out, leftists; not liberals) deny this?

Because the left hates the good and often supports the enemies of the good. Leftism is a moral sickness in the human condition. As I have previously written, it is not even an issue of the left having a broken moral compass. A broken moral compass is occasionally accurate. The left's moral compass always shows north as south and east as west.

That is why the left hates America. Precisely because it has been, in Abraham Lincoln's incomparable words, "the last best hope of earth." And that is why the left hates Israel. With all its flaws, Israel, too, has been a moral beacon. Israel's prime minister has just tweeted out a video made by Col. Richard Kemp, the former commander of British forces in Afghanistan, released by PragerU shortly after the last Israel-Hamas war in 2014. The title of the video says it all: "Israel: The World's Most Moral Army."

In Colonel Kemp's words: "I was the commander of British Forces in Afghanistan. I have fought in combat zones around the world, including Northern Ireland, Bosnia, Macedonia, and Iraq. I was also present throughout the conflict in Gaza in 2014.

"Based on my experience and on my observations, the Israel Defense Force, the IDF, does more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare."

Which is why the left hates Israel. It is morally better than its neighbors, not to mention its enemies. Just as America has been. But if you believe America was founded in 1619 and that men give birth, you will also believe Israel is the villain in its war with Hamas.

https://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2021/05/18/men-give-birth-america-was-founded-in-1619-and-israel-is-the-aggressor-n2589606 



Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


Ceuta: Spain sends troops as 6,000 migrants enter enclave

 

Spain has deployed troops after record numbers of migrants entered its enclave of Ceuta from neighbouring Morocco.

At least 6,000 people reached Ceuta in a single day, Spanish officials say.

They say the migrants - who include about 1,500 minors - either swam around the border fences that jut out into the sea or walked across at low tide.

Spain's Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez has vowed to restore order. Spain says it has already sent some 2,700 migrants back - but not the minors.

Most of the migrants are said to be from Morocco.

The Spanish forces troops have been deployed to the beach to help border police at Ceuta's main entry point - Tarajal, on the enclave's south side.

Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska said 200 troops, plus 200 extra police were going to assist Ceuta's normal 1,100-strong border force. The enclave has some 80,000 inhabitants.

Spain's Ceuta and Melilla enclaves have become magnets for African migrants.

 

 

 

On Tuesday, Moroccan security forces at Fnideq, the adjacent town to Ceuta, fired tear gas to disperse a large crowd of migrants at the border fence, AFP news agency reported.

Mr Sánchez has cancelled a trip to Paris - he was to attend a French-led summit on financial aid for Africa. Instead, he is focusing on the Ceuta crisis, and he promised "maximum firmness" in restoring normality to the enclave.

He has received support from senior EU officials, with European Council President Charles Michel tweeting: "Spain's borders are the European Union's borders."

EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Ylva Johansson described the number of arrivals in Ceuta as "unprecedented" and "worrying", noting that "a big number of them [are] children".

 

 

 

At the other enclave, Melilla, 86 sub-Saharan Africans entered on Tuesday via its southern jetty, which marks the border with Morocco.

Melilla has a formidable border fence, and several hundred more migrants were blocked by security forces, Spain's Efe news agency reports.

Spanish officials quoted by Efe said Moroccan guards had helped the Spanish forces in Melilla. Some migrants threw stones at the Spanish forces, they said.

Spanish media said it was different in Ceuta, where Moroccan border guards stood by and watched as migrants took to the sea to try to reach the enclave.

Most of the migrants were said to be young men, but there were also several families. Many had used inflatable rings and rubber dinghies.

They started arriving in Ceuta at 02:00 (midnight GMT) on Monday, but the number soared during the day. At least one died during the crossing.

Last month, more than 100 migrants arrived at Ceuta's Tarajal entry point. Most were sent back, except about 30 minors whose ages were confirmed by medical tests.
 
 
 

Since the 17th Century both Ceuta and Melilla have been under Spanish rule, though they are long claimed by Morocco. The port cities now form the EU's only land border with Africa. They have semi-autonomous status, like some regions of mainland Spain.

President Trump returning to stage in upcoming convention, rallies

 

OAN Newsroom

UPDATED 7:13 AM PT – Tuesday, May 18, 2021

An adviser to President Trump confirmed his signature MAGA rallies are making a comeback in just a few weeks. That’s according to The Hill Monday, which also reported two events are set to be held in June and one in early July. The rallies have not yet been formally announced, but they are expected to resemble President Trump’s airport rallies during his 2020 reelection campaign.

President Trump is also slated to visit North Carolina to address the state’s GOP convention. The state’s party chairman confirmed the news in a statement Monday, saying the organization is honored to welcome the 45th president to the June convention. He added, the president promised to put America first, in turn, winning over North Carolina in 2020 by keeping that promise.

 

 

The 45th president continues to have a strong grip on the Republican Party as he has made various endorsements of Republicans in upcoming races.

President Trump’s address will be his first outside of his Mar-a-Lago resort since his speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference. The event is geared towards helping the Republican Party take back control of the Senate and House of Representatives.

Meanwhile, Texas Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R) issued a warning to anti-Trump Republicans hoping to push President Trump out of the party. He weighed in on the landscape of the GOP during an interview over the weekend as some of his colleagues, such as Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney (R) and Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R), work to erase Trump’s influence within the GOP.

Crenshaw said he believes President Trump will continue to be an influential figure among Republicans.

“I believe that you’re not going to excommunicate a former president and I refuse to go into this sort of black and white thinking…these are complex human relationships that involve millions of people,” he explained. “I’m a rational human being about this…I refuse to allow this drama to engulf us.”

Crenshaw went on to say he agrees with Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) in terms of not letting the party get engulfed by what he called “drama.” He added, party outliers won’t be successful at getting others to agree with them when it comes to Trump

 

 

https://www.oann.com/president-trump-returning-to-stage-in-upcoming-convention-rallies/ 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our
W3P Homepage

Pompeo, Haley slam Biden’s foreign policy decisions

 

OAN Newsroom

UPDATED 2:31 PM PT – Monday, May 17, 2021

Joe Biden is coming under immense scrutiny over several foreign policy decisions his administration could have handled better.

On Sunday, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo spoke out against the current White House’s efforts to reenter the failed Obama-era nuclear deal with Iran. He stressed that the Trump administration worked hard to restore peace in the Middle East while pointing to the Abraham Accords that centered regional relationships around Israel.

Instead, America’s former top diplomat warned American and Israeli lives are at risk because of Biden’s cozy relationship with the Iranian regime. His comments came one day after former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, also took aim at the Biden administration. She argued Biden is focusing too much on partisan issues like the Georgia voting laws and not enough on threats to our national security.

“(Vladimir ) Putin’s challenging Biden to a debate, you’ve got Kim (Jong-un) starting to test ballistic missiles and, by the way, Biden is going to reduce the funding to our military when China is modernizing theirs,” Haley stated. “They have the largest naval fleet in the world, they have more air defense systems than we do and what are we doing?”

Haley went on to criticize the White House’s response to the DarksSide hack that led officials to shut down the Colonial Pipeline. The infamous hacking group allegedly infiltrated the gasoline company with ransomware and demanded $5 million. White House officials, who almost uniformly described the group simply as hackers and not terrorists, said they would not interfere with Colonial’s decision to pay the ransom.

 

 

Haley claimed she experienced similar situations when she was governor of South Carolina, where she did not negotiate with the alleged terrorists. She said she got the public and private sectors together to find solutions on how to deter future cyber attacks.

Haley urged the Biden administration to bolster America’s cyber security, believing the Colonial Pipeline hacking is only the beginning of an all out cyber war. She cited increasing hacking efforts from America’s adversaries, including China, Iran and North Korea. Haley added, America needs to be ready for possible cyber attacks that could affect our air traffic control systems and utility grids.

 

 

https://www.oann.com/pompeo-haley-slam-bidens-foreign-policy-decisions/ 

 

 


 

Mollie Hemingway Breaks Down the 'Big Lie' of Dems and Media


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

Media and the Democrats have been quick to term questioning the 2020 election as “the big lie.”

The narrative is that any questioning is evil and anti-democracy.

So The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway just did a great tweet thread about how truly hypocritical this all is given what the Democrats and some of the media have done for the past four years.

Hillary Clinton has not stopped questioning the 2016 election. She even made a lot of incredible false claims, including the whopper that “the Russians were in the county election systems of every county in Florida.”

While many are familiar with Hillary Clinton’s claims constantly questioning President Donald Trump’s legitimacy, many others including Jimmy Carter did, as well. “I think a full investigation would show that Trump didn’t actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf,” Carter said in 2019.

Indeed. Many Democrats believe it to this day. Many don’t understand the involvement of the Democrats and Clinton team in paying for the Steele dossier (through the cut-out of a law firm) that helped spread some of this misinformation.

While the story about the Afghan bounties went everywhere, the debunking of it didn’t get the same coverage. The NY Post story about an email indicating Joe Biden may have met with one of Hunter Biden’s foreign business associates after he claimed he knew nothing about his son’s business was blocked on Twitter in October, at a critical time just before the election. Twitter later admitted it was a mistake to block the URL. Funny how those mistakes only tend to work in one way.

Talk about a big lie.


Latest Science Now Says We All Must Wear Masks To Prevent Global Warming


U.S.—A new study from very credible scientists has revealed that science wants everyone to continue to wear masks for the foreseeable future. This is due to brand new evidence from real science that masks actually prevent global warming. 

"The best thing we can do to slow the spread of climate change and sea-level rise is to wear a mask," said Dr. Antonio Grouci, the newly appointed head of the EPA. "You breathe out deadly CO2 all day and that makes the planet sad. If there's a chance masks could catch even one CO2 particle and prevent it from entering the atmosphere, we must take that precaution."

CNN then breathlessly reported that masks must now be worn by all people who don't want to die in a cataclysmic flood or a killer volcano due to climate change. 

Several states are also issuing lockdown orders to prevent people from going outside and polluting the atmosphere with their existence.

Several liberals who were interviewed said they were just happy to have a scientific reason to wear a mask again. 


Dear Prince Harry: Go home

 

 

Harry and Me-gain

 

Article by Jazz Shaw in HotAir

 

Dear Prince Harry: Go home

The British royal formerly known as Prince Harry has taken a new position with the Aspen Institute. He’s going to be serving on a “Commission on Information Disorder,” where he will supposedly be studying the spread of incorrect information throughout America. He went on Dax Shepard’s podcast recently to discuss his new role. After dumping out a sizable serving of word salad and catch phrases, Harry decided to share some of his feelings about the First Amendment and how there might be “loopholes” in it to prevent such misinformation from being promulgated. Oh, and he thinks that the constitutional provision that assures Americans the right to free speech is kind of “bonkers.” (Daily Caller)

When discussing the spread of misinformation, Prince Harry expressed confusion with the First Amendment.

“I’ve got so much I want to say about the First Amendment as I sort of understand it, but it is bonkers. I don’t want to start going down the First Amendment route because that’s a huge subject and one which I don’t understand because I’ve only been here a short time,” Prince Harry said. “But, you can find a loophole in anything. You can capitalize or exploit what’s not said rather than uphold what is said.”

Prince Harry’s comments drew rebukes by many on Twitter.

Let’s just break this down for a moment, shall we? So Harry Windsor (who is not a prince in this country because we don’t do royalty) has a problem with the First Amendment. Perhaps that should have been predictable since he comes from a nation without any such assured freedoms. Of course, he never had to worry about anyone squelching his own speech since he came from one of the most pampered, privileged and affluent families on the planet.

He claims that he doesn’t want to “start going down the First Amendment route” (which he believes is “bonkers”) because it’s a subject he “doesn’t understand,” only having been here a short time. Not for nothing, Harry, but if you don’t understand it, perhaps you shouldn’t be commenting on it in the first place. And if the goal you are setting for yourself is to find “loopholes” in the First Amendment to silence Americans, perhaps we should be rethinking your visa situation.

Harry Windsor is a guest in this country and we generally expect our guests to be a bit better behaved. I understand he needs to find a job because his family is cutting him off from his royal riches, but he should also keep in mind that we don’t owe him any sort of bowing and scraping. He’s taken up residence in the nation that kicked his country’s ass precisely so we could be assured of those constitutional rights.

Further, the project he’s supposedly embarking on in his new position is seriously problematic to begin with. Is Harry’s commission going to take responsibility for what passes as accurate information and disinformation? We’ve already seen how Twitter and Facebook handle such questions. You can be shut down and silenced on those platforms for saying “controversial” things such as the idea that the human race is comprised of two genders. Suggesting that Israel has the right to defend itself against terror attacks or even simply exist can similarly see you branded as a disinformation agent.

Is this foreigner really the guy to put in charge of such a project? Particularly when he admits that he’s completely unfamiliar with and befuddled by the concept of free speech, I’m guessing that he’s really not up for the job.

With that said, I’ll offer another possible career path for Harry Windsor. Maybe you should just go back home where you belong. And take Meghan Markle with you. I’m sure there’s some nonprofit operating in England who would love to have an ex-royal on the payroll just for the prestige it might bring in Great Britain. 

https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2021/05/17/dear-prince-harry-go-home-n390412 






Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


There Is No Way To ‘Fix’ The Equality Act. It’s Identity Politics Or Equality Before The Law, And Republicans Must Choose

 


Article by Joy Pullmann in The Federalist


There Is No Way To ‘Fix’ The Equality Act. It’s Identity Politics Or Equality Before The Law, And Republicans Must Choose

There can be no compromise with those whose political program requires erasing American citizens' constitutionally guaranteed rights to freely speak and freely worship. 
 

On May 15, Fox News reported that three Republican senators would like to write caveats into the Equality Act that might give them the political cover to vote for the bill to criminalize free speech and Christianity in the United States.

“Representatives from the offices of Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C.; Rob Portman, R-Ohio and Susan Collins, R-Maine, met with groups including the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), Concerned Women for America, the Family Research Council and American Principles Project, sources said.”

FRC President Tony Perkins says that wasn’t his group’s goal for the meetings at all. Orthodox faith groups don’t want to be bamboozled into appearing to support a “compromise” on a bill that legally advantages LGBT people to make Christians second-class American citizens and punish free speech, both constitutionally protected rights.

 

The goal of these discussions, Fox’s sources claim, is to essentially pass a federal law that secures legal preferences for LGBT people while making carve-outs for religious groups. The Equality Act and its weaker competitor,  The Fairness For All Act, both would permanently enshrine in federal law President Biden’s executive orders that transgender and de-gender everything the federal government touches, which by now is most of society.

The point of this maneuver is obvious: to fool the religious Americans who largely vote Republican into continuing to do so while Republicans actively undermine their interests and the Constitution.

Pretending a “compromise” is possible here is a fool’s errand in more ways than one. Fundamentally, it’s foolish because it’s not possible to both uphold the U.S. Constitution and the identity politics regime. The two are fundamentally irreconcilable, as Christopher Caldwell explains in detail. The only option is to choose which master Americans will be forced to serve: Ordered freedom or sexual chaos.

The libertarian-minded — or those who use libertarian-sounding arguments to provide cover for Republicans to collude with Democrats in destroying the Constitution — have always proclaimed they don’t care what people do in their personal lives. That’s been a strawman this whole time, and this discussion illuminates that fact.

Percentage-wise, essentially none of the modern LGBT legal enterprise has been about simply protecting what a tiny minority of people do in private. For one thing, natural rights don’t stop being legally enforceable once you enter a private domain. One’s natural right to life, for example, is justly protected also in the privacy of one’s home.

For another thing, none of LGBT political efforts have been about private matters. They have been about public matters, such as whether the state grants marriage certificates or will assign children to a certain home, or will allow people to manufacture children to order that they cannot generate with their own bodies.

Statistically speaking, nobody wants gay people forced to die alone without their families, or denied health insurance or a place to sleep at night. There are legal solutions to all such things that don’t involve erasing women’s sports and forcing Christian churches to be bankrupted by lawsuits from anti-religious cranks with axes to grind.

Nobody supports extreme caricatures like police bursting into gay men’s homes at night while they sleep peacefully. That didn’t even happen to known homosexuals in the “bad old” “repressive” Victorian days of Oscar Wilde, who was actually prosecuted because his sexual appetite started consuming children. He lived under an avowedly Christian regime and he was allowed to groom and molest minors with frankly mild consequences.

And some sort of revival of Victorian morality is nowhere near imminent. Anyone who thinks otherwise lives in the Upside Down. So all this “Handmaids Tale” hysteria about the “religious right’s” hatred for gay people is, quite frankly, a giant smear job designed to foment hatred.

Yes, there are inconsiderate and insensitive people in every group, but as a mass Christians love gay and transgender people just like we do every other sinner on the planet, which is every single person who exists, including ourselves. It’s part of our religion to do that, okay?

Kindness and goodwill are not the issue here, the issue is legalized discrimination designed to end Americans’ constitutionally protected rights to freely associate, speak, and worship. It is a question of which of two irreconcilable sexual regimes Americans will live within, and which is best for the whole of us. The more we can be distracted into arguing about alleged bigotry and meanness, the less we focus on this paramount question. For some that is a goal, and it’s worth pondering why.

Furthermore, if any side of this dispute has been invading privacy, it has been the LGBT activist side. LGBT activists aggressively use state power to invade others’ privacy, such as in forcing men into women’s showers and sports teams, conscripting people to bake cakes and express messages with flowers, and making people unemployable for privately disagreeing with their theology.

All Christians ask of LGBT representatives is what they claim to want from us: that we be allowed to live freely in accord with our beliefs. It seems that is too much for those using the LGBT issue to achieve larger goals of erasing what remains of Americans’ constitutional protections.

Enshrining legal preferences for same-sex masturbation, politically selected racial groups, biological sex, and the rest of the identity politics mess of pottage creates a direct and unresolvable conflict with the American Constitution’s promise of representative self-government with the sole legitimate purpose of securing our natural rights.

Why do natural rights matter? Because, like the description of humankind as male and female, they truthfully reflect and befit human nature and our ordered cosmos. To attempt to sidestep the truths they reflect is to war against human nature itself, like LGBT ideology. To do that makes people unhappy, no matter how much soma you hand out to try to make them feel otherwise.

When social conflict includes deliberately fomented sexual chaos that makes the majority incapable of living a coherent and self-governing life, you don’t have a country any more, you have an asylum. The more people feel as if they are living in an asylum, the less they will commit to ensuring its continued existence.

“Accommodation” of LGBT demands has already made religious and science-believing Americans second-class citizens. Passing any federal sexual orientation and gender preference law like the Equality Act would only increase legal discrimination in the United States against those who maintain centuries-old religious traditions.

I recently discussed with a long-time military officer who worked for years at the Pentagon the new U.S. military and intelligence agency ads promoting extremist identity politics. He told me it’s now difficult for Christians to be promoted even to low-ranking officer positions due to their religious and scientific commitments about what male and female are. Making a generalship is now completely out of the question. Last week’s ousting of Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier over his opposition to Marxism — an official U.S. government position! — only accents this reality.

In other words, because of its support for LGBT ideology, the U.S. military de facto discriminates against Christians. This is an open secret in the ranks. It’s not any kind of secret if you, like I, have occasionally read military press materials in the past decade. The U.S. military expends huge amounts of taxpayer resources to affirm and promote destructive identity politics. Making taxpayers pay for transgender treatments is only the tip of this existential threat to our nation that prioritizes PR over effectiveness and politicizes the military.

This same institution of glass ceilings and “don’t ask don’t tell” policies for Christians in the military is rapidly rolling out across other sectors of public life. If Democrats’ policies and cultural norms expand, Christian health professionals will also face systemic institutionalized discrimination. Christian educators and students already do. The end of creating and amplifying “protected classes” is government-enforced social Balkanization. I shouldn’t have to point out how deeply dangerous this is.

What we need is not further legalized discrimination against politically selected classes of people, but an end to legal preferences for “protected classes” altogether. Protected classes are at odds with the moral and political commitments the United States has no identity without: equality before the law, free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of conscience, free assembly, and the acknowledgment that there is a God, and He is not our government. The United States needs to scrape off these legal barnacles, and quickly, because they’re taking down a ship that carries 330 million people’s lives.

Especially in an era in which abominations like critical race theory have made the racism, sexism, and religious bigotry of identity politics fully apparent, Republicans must abandon these horrific political principles that work to dissolve the very country they desire to lead. There can be no compromise with those whose political program requires erasing American citizens’ constitutionally guaranteed rights to freely speak and freely worship.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/05/17/there-is-no-way-to-fix-the-equality-act-its-identity-politics-or-equality-before-the-law-and-republicans-must-choose/ 


 


Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage