President Obama was well known for his diplomatic blunders, stumbles and curt demeanor with many foreign dignitaries including Queen Elizabeth II. Unsurprisingly it appears the JoeBama administration is picking up right where Obama left off.
Japanese Prime Minister Joshihide Suga was the first world leader to visit the White House since Biden’s installation, and the poor form began with no-one greeting the head of the Japanese government upon arrival. When you consider the leftist narrative about stopping Asian hate, there is a rather ironic aspect to this visit and snub.
Once Prime Minister Suga was inside the White House he was shunned for the greeting by his diplomatic peer, Joe Biden. Instead, Kamala Harris was dispatched to deliver introductory remarks. Beyond the inappropriate form, the subtle message of Kamala Harris being the acting head of the executive branch was on display.
Once PM Suga and Joe Biden sat down things got worse. By the time they both attended the Rose Garden joint press conference, Biden was calling Japanese Master’s Champion Hideki Matsuyama “a boy”. Biden said: “I know how proud you are of the people of Japan are. And you’ve got a Japanese boy coming over here, and guess what, he won the Masters.“
WATCH:
Biden looks completely lost…. watch him, it’s quite remarkable how lost he is:
After the media blew up a story about Russian military putting bounties on American troops in an effort to shape a Russian collusion narrative against the administration of President Trump, the U.S. intelligence community now says that story was likely false.
(Via Daily Beast) – [O]n Thursday, the Biden administration announced that U.S. intelligence only had “low to moderate” confidence in the story after all. Translated from the jargon of spyworld, that means the intelligence agencies have found the story is, at best, unproven—and possibly untrue.
[…] According to the officials on Thursday’s call, the reporting about the alleged “bounties” came from “detainee reporting” – raising the specter that someone told their U.S.-aligned Afghan jailers what they thought was necessary to get out of a cage. Specifically, the official cited “information and evidence of connections to criminal agents in Afghanistan and elements of the Russian government” as sources for the intelligence community’s assessment. (read more)
Pushing Back at the “Redcoats” Who Are Next Door to Us
As
Big Tech tightens its censorship noose around conservative
communication, it becomes even more critical that patriots stay informed
and connected. If farmers and shopkeepers in the 1770s could devise
ways to communicate around the superior British Army to win the
Revolutionary War, certainly conservatives in 2021 can be just as
creative devising ways to circumvent our own “Redcoats” – Big Tech.
Here are just to examples of how Americans during the Revolutionary War circumvented Redcoat censorship:
Writing in code: Patriots used letters to represent other letters that spelled out secret messages.
Mask letters:
Correspondence looked and read like normal letters, but its true
message appeared when a shaped template was placed over the full letter.
Patriots
must push back at woke insanity beyond typing “fr*ud” or “By-den” to
avoid Big Tech censorship detection. Posting angry comments online and
then watching Major League Baseball while sipping Coca-Cola and wearing
Nike sneakers is not going to stop the Democrat Party’s march to
Marxism.
Every conservative must do something! Whatever
your something is, be the catalyst that promotes conservative values
and pushes back against tyranny. This is one woman’s story.
It
started in the summer of 2020 when Joe Biden was hiding in his basement
and Donald Trump was holding triumphant rallies. Raucous online debates
raged on a neighborhood social media site with neighbors yelling at neighbors.
Biden supporters shouted, “Orange Man Bad” and Trump supporters
screamed “Dementia Man Bad.” Accounts were temporarily disabled but it
seemed to conservatives that it happened to them more often, usually
after posting pro-Trump or pro-Christian/faith comments.
Annoyed
with the hypocrisy, one member started a public group just for Trump
supporters. However, accounts continued to be temporarily disabled as
trolls visited and then complained about patriotic comments.
Frustrated,
the public group morphed into a private group. But lacking the time or
ability to vet hundreds of people, conservative accounts continued to be
disabled as trolls enjoyed reporting people of faith, especially Trump
supporters.
“Trumplicans”
regularly contacted the company asking why their account was disabled.
The standard response was that their comment didn’t adhere to “community
guidelines.”
Community guidelines in Bejing? Moscow? Tehran? Hong Kong?
Besides
the belief that there is an overarching anti-conservative bias on this
neighborly site, woe to the person who goes against its liberal
manifesto with a comment that:
Refers to COVID-19 as the Communist China Wuhan Party Virus.
Links an article that quotes experts claiming masks are useless.
Posts that fraud took place in the 2020 Presidential election resulting in Joe Biden stealing the presidency.
Says Joe Biden shows early signs of dementia.
Shares information about an upcoming pro-Trump or Recall Gavin Newsom rally.
Calls people illegally entering the United States illegal aliens.
Believes Dr. Martin Luther King’s dream that all lives matter.
Disabled
– Disabled – Disabled – Disabled …. and in what appears an effort to
further strangle conservative voices, the media site began banning the
loudest pro-Trump, pro-Christian/faith users for one year.
Pushing
back against liberal/progressive socialist insanity, this particular
social media member started an email newsletter so she could write what
would otherwise get her banned from the neighborhood site. The short weekly Trump Neighbors, which
premiered in December, features commentary, upcoming local events, and
rallies (including those she organizes and promotes), along with
political news and contact info (for reaching politicians and CEOs).
Within a short time, most of the private group members were receiving
the newsletter, together with hundreds of other conservatives desperate
to stay connected with fellow patriots. Readership grew as the
newsletter was forwarded to like-minded family, friends, co-workers, and
neighbors.
Her
timing was good because the censoring site was moving even more to its
Marxist left. A conservative friend passed on to the woman an email from
one of the more active volunteers in the neighborhood group who had
taken on the responsibility for policing the neighborhood social media
site. This is that message, although the identifying features have been
removed:
Content
made in opposition, or as a retort, to support for racial equality is
counterproductive and harmful to neighbors of color. We ask that members
be mindful of engaging constructively in discussions of issues related
to racial equality. While members are free to disagree in civil ways
about the policies or tactics advocated by equality movement organizers
and supporters, posts and comments intended to undermine their core
messages of equality and tolerance are prohibited.
For these reasons:
Content
promoting All Lives Matter is prohibited when it’s used to criticize or
diminish the idea of racial equality, or the Black Lives Matter
movement.
Content
promoting Blue Lives Matter is prohibited when it’s used to criticize
or diminish the idea of racial equality, or the Black Lives Matter
movement. This slogan is permitted if the content is honoring,
celebrating, or thanking the police for work done in a community, though
we strongly encourage alternate ways of showing appreciation for police
officers given the slogan’s controversial origins.
Content promoting White Lives Matter is prohibited on ***, as it is most commonly associated with white supremacist groups.
See our Hate & Terror Groups policy for more information.
In
the years leading to America’s Revolutionary War, Benjamin Franklin
referred to Colonial soldiers fighting the British Army for their
independence as “patriots.” Today’s patriots are fighting a
technological army that prefers totalitarianism instead of freedom,
election cheating instead of election integrity, and some lives matter
instead of all lives matter.
One
local newsletter won’t change the Democrat Party’s stampede to Marxism.
But it can most definitely help the noble cause when combined with the
affirmative actions of millions of other conservative patriots across
the country who are doing something more than just posting on Facebook,
Twitter, etc. and screaming at the television.
Patriots
in 2021 must think like their forebears in the 1770s and view Big Tech
and woke corporations as “Redcoats.” From boycotts to buy-cotts; from
writing letters and emails to making phone calls; from joining
organizations to attending rallies and other imaginative ways – patriots
must peacefully push back against tech and corporate authoritarian
insanity or soon we will become the Marxist States of America.
What are you doing to save the United States of America from Marxism?
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi took an apparent jab at Joe Biden while pushing him to accept more refugees into the U.S.
While speaking to reporters Thursday,
Pelosi dropped subtle hints for Biden to raise the current cap of
refugees allowed into the U.S. She claimed it was the White House’s
moral responsibility to take them in.
“So we have to recognize our moral responsibility as we see other
countries take in refugees,” stated the House Speaker. “I think right
now we have, well it’s a very few thousand, and we have to increase that
number.”
Under the Trump administration, the cap was cut to 15,000 from the
previous cap of 85,000. Pelosi strongly opposed this move at the time.
In February, Biden vowed to restore and increase that cap to 125,000.
However, human rights groups are hammering Biden while noting he has not
kept his word.
Britain’s favorite Frenchman, Michel Barnier, is in the Calais region
today where he will address a conference about his part in Brexit and
perhaps give a further indication as to his presidential aspirations.
The EU’s chief Brexit negotiator was described in yesterday’s Le Figaro as
the man who can ‘unite the right’ and in doing so present a credible
alternative to Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen in 2022.
Barnier presides over a political initiative called Patriotes et européens and he explained its concept to Le Figaro: ‘Patriot
and European, this means that I believe in the force of the nations,
the respect of national identities and France as a country of influence
at the head of the European nations.’
What Barnier and a great many of the political class in France fail to
understand is the shift in attitude towards the EU in the last year.
There is the manner in which COVID has exposed the incompetency and
disunity at the heart of the EU, and undoubtedly Brexit has shown
the Euroskeptic French that it is possible to escape the tyranny of the
EU. Protracted, as 17.4 million Britons will testify, but possible with
enough determination.
But there’s another reason why the French have fallen out of love
with the EU, and that’s Germany. Last November a German journalist for Die Zeit caused
something of a stir in France when she ridiculed the country’s handling
of coronavirus (this was before Germany’s own confused response to a
second wave), dubbing France ‘Absurdistan’.
Increasingly, however, the French people are realizing that the real
absurdity is believing Germany still values France and is committed to
the EU project. The French people might be coming to this realization,
but the political class retains an ardent faith in the Franco-German
relationship, rather like those in Westminster who quaintly believe
Britain enjoys a ‘special relationship’ with the USA.
The current affairs magazine Marianne recently devoted an issue to this delusion entitled
‘How Germany has fleeced France’, chronicling the ways —
agriculturally, militarily and industrially — that Germany has exploited
France in recent decades. In 1980 France’s GDP per capita was 5
percent inferior to Germany’s; today it is 13 percent.
In a radio interview, editor Natacha Polony said
that she wasn’t surprised by the angry reaction her magazine received:
‘We have an elite who are so in thrall to our German neighbors that the
moment anyone legitimately defends our national interests, the elite cry
“Germanophobia”.’
Marianne was just the latest publication to question what
exactly France gains from its ‘partnership’ with Germany. Last year,
when France dispatched a naval force to the Mediterranean to assist
Greece in their clash with Turkey, it was noted that Germany did not
support its European allies. ‘In the European team,’ said Le Figaro at the time, ‘Germany is at once the captain and a player who scores against its own side when it’s in its interest.’
Examples abound: the 2015 migrant crisis, the Nord Stream 2 pipeline and Germany’s refusal
in 2012 to agree to a merger between Dutch airspace conglomerate EADS
NV and Britain’s BAE Systems to create the world’s biggest aerospace and
defense group. France was enthusiastic but Germany pulled the plug
because it feared that it would be bad for German industry.
Last month the conservative magazine, Valuers Acteullesdescribed
Germany as the ‘tyrant of the EU’, a reaction sparked by Germany’s
decision to implement border checks in eastern France after a spike in
COVID cases. It listed examples of how Angela Merkel has mastered the
art of acting in her country’s own interest, particularly when it comes
to China. The magazine mocked Emmanuel Macron for his naivety in
believing France means anything to Germany, a country that ‘prostitutes
its industry to the best customer’.
Macron has always been starry-eyed in the presence of Merkel, never
more so than in January 2019 when he signed a treaty in Aachen with the
German chancellor. The official blurb proclaimed that the treaty would
deepen cooperation between the two powers in foreign affairs, defense,
development and security. But it was attacked by right-wing politicians
such as Marine Le Pen and Nicolas Dupont-Aignan. The latter, who allied
with Le Pen in the 2017 election, accused the president of having been
taken for a ride by Merkel. ‘Berlin has been hooked on the US military
since 1945 and has never honored its commitment to spend two percent of
its GDP on military spending,’ he said.
‘France has invested hundreds of billions of euros more than Germany in
its armed forces…what will Germany offer in return to France outside
bouquets of flowers for November 11? Nothing.’
Two and a half years later Dupont-Aignan’s opinion has gone
mainstream — this will pose a problem for Macron ahead of next year’s
election. Marine Le Pen was trounced by Macron in the 2017 presidential
debate but she produced the best line of the evening in declaring: ‘France will be led by a woman. Either me or Madame Merkel.’
Macron entered the Elysée believing that he and Merkel would be the
power couple of Europe but ‘Mutti’ always does what’s best for Germany.
So instead of spending his days bashing Britain over Brexit, Macron should break free from his toxic relationship with Germany. It’s harming him and his country.
Instead of prioritizing resources to confront the menace posed by America’s foreign adversaries the IC is devoting most of its time to pursuing Americans on the political Right.
The freshly reelected Republican senator from Nebraska had kind words this week for Joe Biden’s intelligence chiefs. “The American people are blessed to have an [intelligence community] as serious as ours,” Senator Ben Sasse said during Wednesday’s Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. He called the group, which included FBI Director Christopher Wray and CIA Director William Burns, “heroes” and wanted a chance to “say thank you” in front of the American people.
Sasse, who is supposed to act as a fierce skeptic not a fawning cheerleader of the world’s most powerful intelligence apparatus, singled out Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines for praise. “Your opening statement . . . was incredibly strong,” Sasse swooned.
Haines, the top deputy to former CIA Director John Brennan during the Obama Administration, undoubtedly marveled at winning such a groveling endorsement from a sitting Republican senator—or perhaps she internally laughed at winning over yet another reliable GOP dupe. (In fairness, most Republicans on the committee joined in Sasse’s praise for Haines.)
But Senate Republicans should have been outraged rather than starry-eyed over Haines’ opening statement as well as her conduct in office since taking the reins of the intelligence community the day after Joe Biden’s inauguration. Haines is wasting no time accelerating the weaponization of a sprawling organization that is supposed to identify threats to the homeland by foreign actors, not target Americans with the wrong political views.
Another Collusion Conspirator
It’s a practice, however, that Haines perfected as a trusted aide to Barack Obama; her fingerprints are all over the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion storyline and, as part of Brennan’s inner circle, Haines at least knew of—if she did not partially approve—the unleashing of insidious government surveillance tools against Trump and his campaign.
“Domestically, lone actors and small cells with a broad range of ideological motivations pose a greater immediate threat” than ISIS and al-Qaeda, Haines said in her opening statement to the committee. “We see this threat manifest itself in individuals who…commit terrorist acts for ideological goals stemming from other influences, such as racial bias and antigovernment sentiment, which we refer to as Domestic Violent Extremism or DVE. DVE is an increasingly complex threat that is growing in the United States.”
Instead of prioritizing resources to confront the menace posed by America’s foreign adversaries, which is her job, Haines is devoting most of her time to pursuing Americans on the political Right. Her first official missive as Biden’s DNI didn’t raise alarm over China or North Korea or Iran—it warned that Americans represent a “heightened threat” to the homeland this year.
“Newer sociopolitical developments—such as narratives of fraud in the recent general election, the emboldening impact of the violent breach of the U.S. Capitol, conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and conspiracy theories promoting violence—will almost certainly spur some DVEs to try to engage in violence this year,” Haines claimed in her March report. “Domestic violent extremists are U.S.-based actors who conduct or threaten activities that are dangerous to human life in violation of the criminal laws of the United States or any state; appearing to be intended to intimate or coerce a civilian population; . . . or affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.”
That terrifying scale of violence, Haines suggested, could come from those involved in the January 6 protests on Capitol Hill; apparently not one for subtlety, Haines even included a sketch of the Capitol building in her report. (In a recent NPR interview, Haines referred to the events of that day as an “assault on our own democracy.”)
Overstepping Authority
But there is a slight—major?—problem with Haines’ alert; she clearly exceeded the boundaries of her authority. Haines’ definition of a DVE, per her report, is “an individual based and operating primarily in the United States without direction or inspiration from a foreign terrorist group or other foreign power.” Haines’ purview, however, is solely vested in gathering intelligence related to bad actors allied with hostile regimes beyond our shores, not Trump-supporting veterans from Virginia.
Fortunately, Biden’s intel chiefs did not find the same fawning audience in House Republicans that they found in their Senate Republican counterparts.
During a separate hearing Thursday morning, Haines, Wray, and NSA Director Paul Nakasone were blasted by GOP members of the House Intelligence Committee for abusing their authority to advance the Democrats’ political agenda. Representative Chris Stewart (R-Utah) asked each official whether he or she was statutorily empowered to spy on Americans with “no foreign nexus”; each answered no.
“It’s very clear the IC has no authority to turn your tools or your resources on American citizens,” Stewart scolded. Holding up a copy of Haines’ report, Stewart asked her if she used intelligence community resources to draft the document in violation of an executive order clearly limiting the IC’s reach to “foreign security threats.”
Haines tap-danced around the question, insisting her office merely received, and did not collect, the domestic-based intelligence. But Stewart was having none of it. “Your analysts helped prepare, you did an analysis on this.” The American people, Stewart warned, “should be deeply troubled” by intelligence agencies turning their sights on Americans.
Representative Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the committee’s ranking member, denounced the group for “characterizing wide swaths of American citizens, particularly Republicans and conservatives, as politically suspect, politically violent, and deserving of government surveillance.” He warned any attempt to abuse their authority will be met with “severe repercussions” by Republican lawmakers and the American people.
But Nunes, once again, will be fighting not just the Democrats, the news media, and the administrative state but members of his own party. As they made clear in their shameful performance this week, Senate Republicans have no plan to protect Americans—many of whom support the GOP—from an unbridled intelligence community hell-bent on exacting revenge for the election of Donald Trump nearly five years ago.
“The politicization of the intelligence community, and its use as a weapon by the Democrats to harass their political opponents, threatens Americans’ security and civil liberties, and plays into the very foreign disinformation campaigns that the Democrats claim threaten our democracy,” Nunes told me through a spokesman on Thursday.
Over the past several years, sadly, it’s become almost impossible to tell who poses the biggest threat to our democracy—foreign adversaries or our own government. Tens of millions of Americans undoubtedly would argue it’s the latter.
Article posted by Trackman in Tex's Place blog site on Disqus
TRUMP WON! MATTHEW S DEPERNO IS ABOUT TO PROVE IT IN COURT
Michigan attorney Matthew S. DePerno strikes silicone gold in Antrim
county court—Dominion’s CEO, John Poulos, lied to the legislature under
oath that his machines were not designed to connect to internet—but
looky here!
I’m pretty sure Attorney DePerno just sank the Marxist’s Titanic.
This
could be a Franz Ferdinand moment—an incident that holds much greater
power than the initial event—like Bosnian terrorist Gavrilo Princip
shooting the Archduke and unknowingly kicking off World War 1.
Not
only did DePerno prove false CCP-owned Dominion Voting Systems’ claims
of no connectivity he has the receipts where Antrim County bought 17 of
their external communications devices to make sure of it—and he’s got
the modems in the motherboards of the inspected machines used in the
fraud to prove it.
From Exhibit 6 of DePerno’s brief (link is below) the court learned that Antrim County’s machines (all made by Dominion or Subsidiaries):
ES&S
(Election Systems & Software) DS200 voting machine was found to
have a Telit LE910-SV1 Modem Chip installed on its motherboard
Chip
utilized a commercial Verizon SIM card with an Access Point Name (APN)
configuration specific to the ES&S DS200 provisioning.
To
translate, this means that anything with a sim card (like every
cellphone on the planet) or small devices planted—oh, let’s say like
under the light switch plates as were found in Fulton County,
Georgia—could transmit the count and allow access to change the results
via the external relay device.
In
short, Sheryl Guy, the elected clerk of Antrim County, Michigan tried
to steal the election for the Democrats, on orders from above.
It
was easy to figure out. Antrim County is about as Democrat as a Fourth
of July parade (which for non-U.S. readers means ‘not at all’ as Dems
hate America), and regular citizen, Bill Bailey, wanted to know how Guy
did it, so he sued her and the Attorney General of the State, the head
rigger.
Antrim county is Trump country—he won by 62% in 2016
Sheryl
Guy, the good little Marxist she is, has lied to the court, admittedly
destroyed evidence to prevent discovery, delayed since November trying
to ride out the clock—and shown a willingness to break any law in to aid
her Marxist masters in the Attorney General’s office—defendants Dana
Nessel, the AG and her consorts, Heather S. Meingast and Erik A. Grill.
In
spite of all this criminal activity, the unstoppable Mr. DePerno has
caught Sheryl Guy—who dismissed the case without authority, even though
she was a material witness in it—and The Democrat Party, foreign actors,
plus corrupt attorneys with national standing like Marc Elias—best
known for creating the Russia Hoax to be used by Hillary Clinton’s
campaign against then-candidate, Donald J. Trump using foreign spies.
Even
better, DePerno may have put Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer in such a
spotlight—worldwide—that he may have to follow the law in this case,
which would be a refreshing change from what we’ve seen thus far.
Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer—hero or hound? We’ll know soon.
86
judges have proven themselves so compromised, blackmailed or just
corrupt that only a handful have stood true enough to law to even look
at the evidence. This judge did, so he gets a pass—for now.
The evidence is so overwhelming, real Americans are going public rather than trusting a court with it, so we’ll see
Courts,
unlike Congress, which has long rated somewhere between STDs and very
tight shoes at a Catholic wedding, are also now sinking in stature. It’s
a race to the bottom, as we learn corrupt judges are the rule as well.
Public
trust in government overall, in fact, has sunk to 17% in the United
States—a phenomenal number—but one well earned. They’re scoundrels to
the man and woman it seems.
Middle
class ne’er-do-wells get a backer in their home community, run for
Congress and go the DC. They ride that wild pony for a few years taking
bribes and getting inside deals, becoming exorbitantly rich.
Take
for example House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, daughter of a Baltimore mayor
who had to quit the 1954 election for governor because his ties to the
Mob (the Piracci gang) were exposed—and she’s now worth $200+ million.
Or
Diane Feinstein, whose chauffeur of twenty years was outed as a Chinese
spy when Trump took office—but like Pelosi, their husbands and staffers
are shareholders in Dominion— and both are mysteriously worth hundreds
of millions. Funny how that happens, no?
The Courageous Sidney Powell outed them on national TV with Maria Bartiromo
The headlines read, “Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein both financially tied to Dominion Voting Systems”.
That’s
part of what put us on the Dominion case back in November, the week
after the election. If these two scuzbuckets were involved with the
company, it had to be rotten—and the CCP bought Dominion Voting Systems
just a month before the election—making them even richer!
Sidney
then put the hammer down on the Corruptocrats, telling Maria, “They had
this all planned, Maria. They had the algorithms. They had the paper
ballots waiting to be inserted if and when needed. And notably,
President Trump’s vote in the blue states went up enormously. That’s
when they had to stop the vote count and go in and replace votes for
Biden and take away Trump votes.”
This is a catfight Sidney Powell is now winning
‘After
Sidney threw down the gauntlet against the crooks on national TV,
Bartiromo responded by pointing out that new reports have linked Nancy
Pelosi’s longtime chief of staff, along with Dianne Feinstein’s husband
Richard Blum to Dominion Voting Systems, the company behind the voting
software that the Democrats used to try to steal the election for Joe
Biden.’ (Ibid)
Dominion sued her for $1.3 billion to shut her up and she just laughed—“great! Now I can get ‘discovery’ and go after them”
Powell
says this is absolutely correct. They tried to not only use Dominion
to steal the election, but to make more money in the process.
“Well,
obviously they [the Pelosis and Feinsteins] have invested in it for
their own reasons and are using it to commit this fraud to steal votes,”
Powell stated.
No time to read the whole brief? Here’s the takeaway
They’ve
been lying to us for months saying that there was no way to hook these
machines to the internet despite all evidence to the contrary.
Attorney
DePerno told the court, “Antrim County purchased USB external motions
[sic] (likely 17) that allowed their machines to connect to the
internet. We reveal that Antrim County had at least one connection to
Taiwan and Germany,” (page 3 of brief).
Remember
the German server switching votes via SCYTL we reported about last year
and updated after the Italian government was brought down because of
it?
We
caught a lot of heat from that reporting, but our sources were
solid—just ahead of the curve—and now the evidence is exposed within the
machine itself.
DePerno
also has the Telit modem chips designed to communicate with any SIM
card from these machines and these external rigs which were purchased
from Dominion and its subsidiary Election Systems and Software.
These
external communications repeaters were designed to be hidden nearby
(like in a light switch, as were found in Fulton County, Georgia) to
allow interface from any place on the planet to fix the vote.
Those are now indisputable facts, and the evidence is finally before a court of law.
Pictures
of Dr. Frank have been removed from the internet for his own safety and
he is being guarded since the release of his evidence—and once you see
it, you’ll know why.
And there is more
Dr.
Douglas G. Frank, PhD (whose data is in Exhibit 3 of the brief) has
proven beyond any doubt that not only the Marxists in Michigan, but all
of the fraud states, used their respective census data to program an
algorithm into the voting machines to prescribe what vote-fixing was
needed—but within the range of believability—based on actual census
numbers for each State.
Very
damn clever and even more clever of Dr. Frank to catch them. Even if
they take him out, however, they can’t go back and change the 2010
census numbers or the voter registrations and ballot counts that track
them in 99% statistically, so this evidence will bring them down.
The
‘kick-out’ rate was then set on the Dominion machines as high as 70%
(though ‘rejected ballots’ are usually less than 1% in non-rigged
elections).
This allowed political operatives to adjudicate those
ballots in bulk to match the algorithm set from the State’s last
census—and mark up a win for the Bolsheviks up and down the ballot, no
matter what the voters had to say about it.
In
fact, we can prove now that Senatorial candidate, John James, the
African American veteran and businessman running in Michigan was robbed
of his seat, just like his friend and supporter, Donald Trump.
Trump’s
victory on November 3rd of 2020 was so overwhelming and beyond anything
their ‘experts’ said could happen, that it broke the algorithm(s)—and
John James was actually running ahead of Trump, he was so popular!
That’s how massive the fraud was to cover up their wins.
The
only choice was to shut down the counting immediately in all the fraud
states (which was unprecedented) to give time to truck in fake ballots
—as was caught on camera in Detroit—or drag them out from under tables
—as was also caught on camera in Fulton County, Georgia, both occurring
the day after the election to be scanned into the Dominion machines.
This
allowed the illegal post-election ballots to be ‘adjudicated’—adding
enough Biden votes and switching enough Trump votes to Biden—to make the
algorithm work, though in many places—like Detroit— that required
putting far more votes than there were voters in places where Trump’s
win was by a landslide.
As
an example, one of the epicentres of fraud set up by Mark Zuckerberg
in Detroit, Michigan; had 71 precincts with more votes than voters—once
an impossibility in America.
Maybe the Marxist pundits can explain that one the next time they say, “No evidence of fraud.”
But
the Marxists and their media hacks, as well as Facebook and Twitter not
only continue to say ‘Move on. Nothing to see here,’ but ban anyone of
us who speak about the fraud in which they heavily participated from
their propaganda sites.
Well
apparently, there is much more to see, and thanks to courageous
attorneys like Matthew DePerno and Sidney Powell, it is finally before
the public where the Marxists/Media/Big Tech moguls can’t spin it or ban
it.
As we have reported, Joe Biden got batted around by both the Chinese and Vladimir Putin in separate incidents, making one wonder if Biden was going to be able to respond appropriately to the threats that both China and Russia were posing around the world. That weakness already seemed to be encouraging China and Russia to make aggressive moves.
Now it’s good that Biden responds to Russian provocations. Assuming they’re real, unlike the Russian bounties story. But the problem is that his response has been the typical Joe Biden we’ve seen in other things: mixed and incoherent. He put out that declaration, which as we said, had issues, but at least it did have sanctions and did expel diplomats.
But in the meantime, as the NY Post notes, Biden said he would be sending two destroyers to the Black Sea to deliver a message to Putin about not making moves on Ukraine, after Russia had massed thousands of troops on their border with Ukraine.
Putin warned the U.S. to stay away “for their own good.” What did Biden do then? He blinked and decided not to send the ships, an incredibly weak move, making it look like he was caving to Putin, perhaps the worst possible thing he could do. Putin was putting him to the test and he failed it badly.
Now Putin, believing Biden to be all talk and no action, just announced he’s going to close the Kerch Strait, beginning next week until October to block any foreign warships out, including the United States. So if we wanted to help Ukraine through that avenue, now we can’t. An exceedingly bad move by Biden.
“We have no desire to be in an escalating war with Russia,” the Daily Mail quoted a senior administration official as saying, who added that the White House doesn’t want things “spinning out of control.”
“We do not seek a downward spiral. We can and think we can avoid that,” the official said.
They think sanctions will be enough. But sanctions wouldn’t stop Putin from moving into Ukraine if he wants to do so soon and now we’ve lost that way to check him. If he does move into Ukraine, we will be up a creek without a paddle trying to live up to our commitments that we have made to that country.
President Obama was well known for his diplomatic blunders, stumbles and curt demeanor with many foreign dignitaries including Queen Elizabeth II. Unsurprisingly it appears the JoeBama administration is picking up right where Obama left off.
After the media blew up a story about Russian military putting bounties on American troops in an effort to shape a Russian collusion narrative against the administration of President Trump, the U.S. intelligence community now says that story was likely false.
