Tuesday, March 9, 2021

#BlueAnon Dossier: Conspiracies Promoted by the Conspiracy-Hating Press

AP Photo/Julio Cortez

For a group that talks about them with contempt, our journalists just LOVE to spread crackpot theories.

This past Thursday, on March 4, Washington was paralyzed. The National Guard troops were placed on high-alert with their unloaded weapons, the security fencing surrounding the Capitol was fortified, and Congress suspended its daily schedule. This was all done in preparation for a renewed assault on our nation’s capital and our democracy. The reason? The devotees of Qanon — that amorphous and overhyped cabal of political zealotry — were supposedly claiming that is the true inaugural date and that a failure of a Trump swearing-in ceremony would lead to renewed violence.

The Washington Post eventually came out to sheepishly report the empty streets seen in D.C. that day revealed something completely different: ‘’A March 4 threat from militant Trump supporters proves a mirage’’. This should be an abject embarrassment for the Democrats in Congress and the members of the media, but this is Washington we are speaking about; that emotion does not exist inside the beltway.

This non-episode reveals two details on the whole Qanon issue. One is that the press is intent to use this group as a political tool to attack conservatives, presenting their crackpot theories as mainstream thought within the movement. This attempt however exposes the other issue. In order to wield this weapon, the media needs to both pay close attention to Q theories, and then they need to broadcast them. What takes place then is the press taking these conspiracies far more seriously than anyone on the right; almost anytime I have heard of a Q talking point it is being promoted by someone in the press

The result: the embarrassment of last Thursday. The press has been so enamored over these conspiracy theories that they have developed their own version — dubbed BlueAnon. The industry that strives to deride conservatives for allegedly being beholden to Q-theories is actually borderline obsessed with conspiracies themselves. Here is the significant difference — while the hated Q-hysterics derive from randos on the internet, in the case of BlueAnon it usually involves crackpot theories pushed by the mainstream media.

Thus, to illustrate just how widespread these efforts have been, here is a list of just some of the wild claims we have witnessed being delivered in the press; you know, those people who despise conspiracy theories. Beginning with the biggest:

1. RUSSIAN COLLUSION WITH THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN

This was a four-year effort we all witnessed that ended up amounting to less than the center of a doughnut. It was such a widespread and unfounded claim that it actually has subsets: 

  • 1.a) The Steele Dossier – The document that was the basis of the entire affair was entirely cooked up. Bought by Democrat interests it was so light in content that when the FISA warrant was applied for they needed to feed this to members of the press, and those reports were then deemed corroboration to justify the warrant. In other words, they proved the dossier was accurate by referencing – the dossier.
  • 1.b) The Russian Pee Tape – Springing up out of this fable was the claim that there was a video made of Donald Trump with Russian hookers who were recorded micturating on the future President. The story was widespread and endured for years, yet there was never anything approaching proof that it exists.
  • 1.c) ‘’There were dozens of convictions’’ – This is the tout when the failure of the Mueller Investigation is pointed out. True, Mueller concocted dozens of convictions and guilty pleas, but what is not acknowledged is none of them were connected to the campaign. Most convictions were against Russian hackers who will never face a charge here in the states, and all of Paul Manafort’s involved banking scams he ran before the election.

2. DONALD TRUMP WILL FIGHT TO RETAIN POWER

This is another with some layers of hysteria. The overriding theory was that President Trump would not accept an election result and fight to remain in power in tyrannical fashion.

  • 2.a) Trump Will Be A White House Squatter – After the election, there was rampant speculation that Donald Trump would refuse to leave, a rather ludicrous proposition that had many fantasizing about his being marched out in handcuffs. More than based on the election result, this was something those on the left were speculating about for at least a year, based on nothing at all.
  • 2.b) Trump Will Enforce Martial Law – Fantasies ran wild that Trump would turn tinpot-dictator and call in the military to remain in power. Even when he denied it directly the press held that up as proof.
  • 2.c) Trump Will Use Nuclear Weapons To Stay In Power – Apparently, a war is the secret to keeping himself ensconced in the Oval Office.

 

3. TRUMP COULD LITERALLY OVERTURN THE ELECTION

This was one that the press was convinced would play out last November. The gambit was to have the electoral votes in states with Republican control be decided by the legislatures, in opposition to the voters, giving him an Electoral College advantage.

4. REMOVING TRUMP BY INVOKING THE 25TH AMENDMENT

This had been a long-running fever dream from the left. The idea was that it could be proven Trump was mentally deficient enough to have him forced from office. That Joe Biden exhibited true mental deficiencies while on the campaign trail was not a concern.

5. THE PENCE PARDON GAMBIT

Another two-parter that ran this January. It involved Donald Trump stepping down before the inaugural so that Mike Pence would be installed briefly as President.

(Note – Adding to the crackpot nature of things, at no time was Donald Trump accused of any crime for which he needed a pardon.)

6.THE JANUARY 6 RIOT WAS AIDED BY THE FACT THAT SOME CAPITOL POLICE LET RIOTERS INSIDE

It was beginning to sound like some serious deep state shenanigans when it was tabled that the reason the rioters stormed the Capitol was because they had allies within the local police force opening the doors for them.

7. MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD WERE A THREAT FOR SECRETLY BEING PART OF THE INSURRECTION GROUPS

We Rep. Steven Cohen suggesting that members of the Guard are mostly male and thus Trump supporters, and could end up being a threat like other military members who have killed world leaders in the past.

8. THE PENTAGON WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL GUARD DELAY IN PROTECTING THE CAPITOL

We can thank CNN’s Asha Rangappa for this gem, as Jeff Charles mentioned previously.

While the press was in full-blown outrage over the President and many Republicans questioning the election results and curious over possible mismanagement with vote tallies and ballot machines, they preferred that we ignore there had been numerous outrages from them about prospective scams the Republicans were engaged in ahead of the election.

9. THE POSTMASTER GENERAL WAS FOLLOWING TRUMP’S ORDERS TO DERAIL MAIL-IN VOTING

People actually protested outside his home in outrage, lack of evidence not a concern.

10. THE PRESIDENT WAS STEALING MAILBOXES OR LOCKING THEM UP AS A SIGN OF VOTER SUPPRESSION

Hey now, they had pictures of this taking place and everything. Proven!  

11. PRESIDENT TRUMP ORDERED POSTAL SORTING MACHINES TO BE DECOMMISSIONED AHEAD OF THE ELECTION

These dramatic images circulated in the press when they were in fact older machines scheduled to be replaced, or they were magazine sorters that were no longer needed. The result was there was enough outrage that for optics the postmaster halted all switchovers of the machines — meaning the surge in mail-in ballots would be handled on outdated equipment.

12. THE ACCEPTABLE CLAIMS OF VOTER FRAUD

After the election, it was considered an outrage to question any voting results. Unless, of course, there were accusations that Republicans were engaged in committing the fraud – then there was quiet contemplation over the claims.

To close out this installment let us harken back to the infectious month of October, when President Trump was found to have contracted the COVID-19 virus. Or did he?!?!

13. PRESIDENT TRUMP ”CLAIMS’’ HE CAUGHT COVID IN ORDER TO PROMOTE HIS VACCINE AHEAD OF THE ELECTION

Michael Moore and others said the ”claim’’ of a positive result was so the President would either win over voters, or to even promote his impending vaccine rollout.

14. TRUMP IS FAKING HIS RECOVERY AND WILL BE DOWN FOR WEEKS

So said the doctors who were not treating him.

15. THE PRESIDENT WAS FAR MORE ILL THAN HIS TEAM OF DOCTORS WERE TELLING US

Following a press conference by his doctors at Walter Reed the press ran with a wild story he was far sicker than explained. This was based on an anonymous email sent out to the press. This meant after a year of telling us to obey the science on the pandemic they were choosing to now ignore medical professionals in order to run with an unproven claim. This led to hostility and even calls to defund Walter Reed hospital — over a bogus story.

 

(This is the start of a series of pieces detailing numerous tinfoil hat theories the media have been pimping out to the public. If you have other examples, toss them in the comments section and they could be included in future installments.)


at

Biden’s Handlers Panic at the Prospect of Him Being Asked a Question



A video clip from Joe Biden’s visit to a hardware store in DC shows Biden’s handlers in the background panicking at the prospect of him being asked a question.

The clip shows Biden, who is wearing two face masks, appearing distracted as he waves to some people on a higher level while meeting with the store owner.

As the owner tries to address Biden again, Biden’s handlers suddenly become agitated and one is repeatedly heard saying, “come on press, let’s go, we’re gonna move out.”

“Let’s go you guys, come on let’s go,” she repeats herself as one of the reporters tries to ask Biden about “the crisis at the border.”

The reporters dutifully follow orders and stop asking questions.

Biden has yet to hold a proper press conference or address the nation in any meaningful way since winning the presidency.

His handlers’ desperation to keep him away from reporters is unsurprising given Biden struggles to complete sentences and forgets the name of the Pentagon and his own Defense Secretary.

However, this is merely a continuation of the Biden campaign, when Uncle Joe was largely kept in a basement away from the general public and real journalists.


at

Report: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation linked to Chinese company found to have mined Americans data

 

OAN Newsroom

UPDATED 9:14 AM PT – Tuesday, March 9, 2021

Bill Gates has reportedly been linked with a Chinese company U.S. officials are now calling a national security risk for nearly a decade. According to reports Monday, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has worked extensively with BGI Genomics since 2012, which was formerly known as the Beijing Genomics Institute.

Back in 2012, the billionaire’s foundation established a memorandum of understanding with the Chinese firm to “bring genomics research” to the global society. This occurred as U.S. Intelligence officials said the company used COVID-19 test kits supplied to the U.S. government to “collect, store and exploit bio-metric information.”

“They are the ultimate company that shows connectivity to both the communist state as well as the military apparatus,” stated Will Evanina, former director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center. “Current estimates are that 80 percent of American adults have had all of their personally identifiable information stolen by the Communist Party of China.”

 

 

 China’s communist government has reportedly been heavily invested in the company, which raised $300 million from investors last month.

 

 

https://www.oann.com/report-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-linked-to-chinese-company-found-to-have-mined-americans-data/ 

 

 


 

 

Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our
W3P Homepage

 

at

‘Blue Anon’ Strikes a Nerve—Naturally, Big Tech Is Trying to Censor It

Urban Dictionary, a popular online slang lexicon,
apparently doesn’t like terms that punch Left.


A new term has entered the political lexicon in recent months, and it appears to have left-wing activists sputtering with rage.

Conservatives on social media have been using “Blue Anon” to describe Democrats who believe in various government-sanctioned conspiracy theories, leading some on the Left to attempt to censor the potent term.

The very first sighting of “Blue Anon” on Twitter was in August 2018, according to the pseudonymous Twitter user “Max Nordau.”

Aaron Maté, a left-wing investigative journalist, and the Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway helped popularize the term two years later.

In the wake of the rigged 2020 election, and the storming of the Capitol, Democrats and their allies in the corporate media have sought to pigeonhole the Republican Party as the party of conspiracy theorists.

In a series of tweets last month, Nordau used the term “Blue Anon” to frame the left as the most prolific conspiracy theorists.

Since then, mocking left-wing conspiracy theorists with the term “Blue Anon” has become a popular pastime on Twitter.

Over the weekend, the following definition of “Blue Anon” was submitted to Urban Dictionary by . . . , well, me, under the name of “Mrs. Tibbs.”

Conservatives on Twitter naturally reacted with shock and delight that this subversive message against the liberal establishment was allowed on Urban Dictionary’s platform. The term “Blue Anon” quickly became a “top definition” on the platform, and trended on Twitter.

By Sunday morning, however, the term “Blue Anon” had been removed from Urban Dictionary, most likely falling victim to a mass flagging campaign.

It is also possible that someone within the company objected to the definition and had it deleted, or someone powerful from outside of the company demanded its deletion.

Urban Dictionary allows many controversial terms and definitions on its platform, including very lewd and profane entries, as well as those that contain politically derogatory definitions.

Google also appeared to be censoring the term, according to James Lindsay, a math Ph.D., founder of New Discourses, and bestselling co-author of Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identity—And Why This Harms Everybody.

After Blue Anon was removed from Urban Dictionary, Lindsay and many other users posted the definition on Twitter:

On Monday, the dam seemed to break, and 14 Blue Anon entries emerged on Urban Dictionary, most of them similar or identical to the original post. The original post by “Mrs. Tibbs,” however, was still missing.

American Greatness has asked the platform to explain why the original post was removed. We have yet to receive a reply.


at

Watch This – Will President Marbles Make it To The End of This Year?


Serious question: will Joe Biden make it to the end of the year before his worsening jibberish collapses his facade and the media initiate the shift to Kamala Harris?

Before answering, watch this video from today.  Biden cannot remember the name of the Pentagon, or the name of his Defense Secretary, Lloyd Austin.  Instead, he rambles through an incoherent mess of mumbled words as he attempts to exit the speech.


Eventually the media will have to stop pretending not to notice the dementia.



at

15 Insane Things In Democrats’ H.R. 1 Bill To Corrupt Elections Forever

Here are just some of the unconstitutional, absurd, nakedly partisan, and crime-indulging provisions that 220 House Democrats voted for.



On Wednesday, House Democrats passed an 800-page bill that would mandate insecure voting processes and subject voting tallies to partisan manipulation. It’s a slap in the face to the half of Americans, including many Democrats, who believe the 2020 election was riddled with fraud and errors, largely due to the rapid expansion of mail-in balloting and other suspensions of state election laws.

“It is difficult to imagine a legislative proposal more threatening to election integrity and voter confidence,” write 20 Republican attorneys general in a Thursday letter about the ridiculously named For The People Act of 2021, or H.R. 1. Democrats have made the bill their top priority this Congress to permanently cement their current unified control of the federal government. 

The bill “would (among other things) implement nationwide the worst changes in election rules that occurred during the 2020 election; go even further in eroding and eliminating basic security protocols that states have in place; and interfere with the ability of states and their citizens to determine the qualifications and eligibility of voters, ensure the accuracy of voter registration rolls, secure the fairness and integrity of elections, and participate and speak freely in the political process,” says a Heritage Foundation analysis.

H.R. 1 broadcasts Democrats’ goals for unending electoral dominance through openly rigged voting processes. It would engineer an unconstitutional federal takeover of state elections for national office. No surprise, then, that Joe Biden says he will sign this legislation if it reaches his desk.

Here are just some of the unconstitutional, absurd, nakedly partisan, and crime-assisting provisions in this bill that 220 House Democrats voted for and every House Republican voted against.

1. Openly Breaks the Constitution

As the attorneys general note, “Under both the Elections Clause of Article I of the Constitution and the Electors Clause of Article II, States have principal—and with presidential elections, exclusive—responsibility to safeguard the manner of holding elections.” This bill would instead unconstitutionally give Congress primacy over state elections, in numerous ways. 

Yet the Constitution expressly affords the states, not Congress, the power to determine how presidential electors are selected. Mandating mail-in voting, requiring states to accept late ballots, overriding state voter ID laws, and mandating that states conduct redistricting through unelected commissions all violate states’ constitutional authority in conducting elections.

2. Set Up Star Chambers to Intimidate Judges

The bill would establish a “Commission to Protect Democratic Institutions” that would have the power to force judges to testify before a panel of unelected federal bureaucrats. According to the bill on page 389, the commission, or any member or subcommittee of the commission, may “hold hearings and sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, receive such evidence, and administer such oaths as the Commission considers advisable.”

This commission, the Heritage analysis finds, “would be given the authority to compel judges to testify and justify their legal decisions, threatening their independent judgment and subjecting them to political pressure and harassment.”

3. Mandate Mail-in Ballots, 10-Day Delay in Results

Rather than reject the 2020 electoral chaos caused by bureaucrats suspending state election laws to further unreliable mail-in voting and suspend legal deadlines for mailed ballots, H.R. 1 would mandate this electoral chaos forever. 

The bill mandates universal mail-in balloting and requires states to wait ten days after election day for any outstanding tranches of ballots to be suddenly discovered in Democrat-run strongholds — oops, I mean, allow all ballots to arrive. The Heritage report notes that “no-fault absentee ballots” “are the tool of choice for vote thieves.”

Besides a recipe for chaos and partisan election manipulation, this is unconstitutional. The attorneys general note that “The exclusivity of state power to ‘define the method’ of choosing presidential electors means that Congress may not force states to permit presidential voting by mail or curbside voting.”

4. Eliminate Voter ID Election Security

“Perhaps most egregious is the Act’s limitations on voter ID laws,” write the attorneys general. “Fairly considered, requiring government-issued photo identification at the polls represents nothing more than a best practice for election administration.”

After a brief overview of this history of bipartisan support for voter ID laws, the letter continues: “Voter ID laws remain popular, with thirty-five states requiring some form of documentary personal identification at the polls. Yet the Act would dismantle meaningful voter ID laws by allowing a statement, as a substitute for prior-issued, document-backed identification, to ‘attest[] to the individual’s identity and . . . that the individual is eligible to vote in the election.’ This does little to ensure that voters are who they say they are. Worse, it vitiates the capacity of voter ID requirements to protect against improper interference with voting rights.”

5. Register Millions Of Criminally Present Foreign Citizens to Vote 

By forcing states to automatically and duplicatively register all people to vote through government outposts such as motor vehicles, state universities, and welfare agencies, H.R. 1 would register millions of illegal migrants to vote in the United States. According to their own reports on surveys, millions of illegally present foreign citizens vote in the United States, and overwhelmingly for Democrats. Democrats including President Barack Obama have worked to prevent states from enforcing laws against foreign citizens voting in U.S. elections.

This bill would essentially create de facto voting rights for the tens of millions of non-citizens inside the United States. Under this bill, states must automatically register every adult and are legally prohibited from inspecting or checking whether anyone who votes is legally eligible to do so.

The bill also bans courts from enforcing any legal penalties on any foreign citizens who illegally vote in the United States (Section 1015). This bill’s provisions would thus allow anyone inside the United States to vote in its elections with no consequences, even if they are not citizens and have demonstrated contempt for our nation by breaking our laws to take advantage of our freedoms (for as long as they last).

6. Explode Opportunities for Election Cheating

“Adding to the threat of increased voter fraud, the Act would mandate nationwide automatic voter registration and Election Day voter registration,” write the attorneys general. “Such systems would provide too many opportunities for non-citizens and others ineligible to vote to register and cast fraudulent ballots before officials can take preventive action.”

Allowing people to register the same day they vote in 2020 contributed to suspiciously high — near or even above 100 percent — percentages of registered voters reportedly casting ballots in many precincts, often in key locations.

The bill would also “Prevent election officials from checking the eligibility and qualifications of voters and removing ineligible voters,” notes the Heritage analysis. It would require every ballot to be considered legitimate from the get-go, effectively banning provisional ballots.

Those are currently used, for example, when a voter shows up at the polls and records say he already voted or he is registered using incorrect information such as the wrong address. Under this bill, he could still vote without the error being cleared up, and with a regular, not provisional, ballot.

The bill would also eliminate any requirements that a witness sign an absentee ballot, and send absentee ballots for life to everyone who has ever used one. It would also effectively ban matching signatures on absentee ballots to government records of the voter’s signature, such as from a driver’s license record (Section 307).

Therefore, the bill eliminates almost every safeguard meant to protect against fraud and give voters confidence in election results.

7. Prevent Cleaning Up Voter Rolls

If the bill passes into law, “States could not use a combination of voter inactivity and unresponsiveness to maintain voter lists but may instead remove illegitimate voter registrations only where officials obtain some other unspecified ‘objective and reliable evidence that the registrant is ineligible to vote,'” write the 20 state attorneys general. “This attack on reliable methods that states have been using to maintain voters lists without specifying any reasonable permissible alternatives belies any actual interest in preventing voter fraud. The objective, rather, seems to be to prevent meaningful voter list maintenance altogether.”

Moreover, the bill threatens anyone, such as a local election official or poll watcher, who might undertake any questioning of any voter or attempts to establish his or her eligibility to vote. Section 1071 says: “It shall be unlawful for any person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, to corruptly hinder, interfere with, or prevent another person from registering to vote or to corruptly hinder, interfere with, or prevent another person from aiding another person in registering to vote.” The maximum penalty for this would be up to five years in prison.

8. Unleash Mobs on Political Donors

If passed, the bill would require that political speakers and nonprofit organizations publish the identities of their donors. This would create blacklists for leftist activists to target to prevent their political opponents from the opportunity to speak in public, note the attorneys general.

In addition, the bill would require massive compliance costs for “candidates, citizens, civic groups, unions, corporations, and nonprofit organizations,” says the Heritage Foundation. “Many of these provisions violate the First Amendment, protect incumbents, and reduce the accountability of politicians to the public; its onerous disclosure requirements for nonprofit organizations would subject their members and donors to intimidation and harassment.”

Even the leftist American Civil Liberties Union expressed concern about these provisions in a letter to top House Democrats. These sections of H.R. 1 “could harm political advocacy and expose non-profit donors to harassment and threats of violence should their support for organizations be subject to forced disclosure,” the ACLU wrote.

9. Gerrymander Districts to Favor Democrats

The bill would establish a commission of unelected national bureaucrats to decide where the political boundaries for various districts will be, rather than state elected officials.

“At least when legislatures draw boundary lines voters may punish egregious behavior at the next election; not so with government-by-commission, which trades accountability for mythical expertise and disinterest,” complain the Republican attorneys general about this provision. “The republican form of government inherently rejects the idea that elites have some unique capacity to discern and implement the best policies. The American tradition instead embraces political accountability as the best way to advance the public interest. With respect to political redistricting, no ideal, perfectly balanced congressional boundaries exist, so we should let the people decide, through their elected officials, where to place them.”

10. Make Vote Hacking Easier

The bill’s mass forced voter registration of every person with a record in various state databases comprises “a recipe for massive voter registration fraud by hackers and cyber criminals,” the Heritage analysis finds. Government databases are notorious for breaches of private information by cybercriminals and foreign countries. This would also create numerous duplicate voter registrations that the bill bans state and local officials from cleaning up, potentially assisting individuals in voting multiple times.

11. Let Former Felons Vote Before They’ve Completed Their Sentences

The Heritage analysis says this bill would also “Require states to restore the ability of felons to vote the moment they are out of prison regardless of uncompleted parole, probation, or restitution requirements. Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment gives states the constitutional authority to decide when felons who committed crimes against their fellow citizens may vote again. Congress cannot override a constitutional amendment with a statute.”

12. Help 16- and 17-Year-Olds Vote Illegally

H.R. 1 “would also require states to allow 16-year-olds and 17-year-olds to register; when combined with a ban on voter ID and restrictions on the ability to challenge the eligibility of a voter, this would effectively ensure that underage individuals could vote with impunity,” says the Heritage analysis.

In Section 1091, the bill establishes a federal pilot program in public schools to register 12th graders to vote. This is a blatant attempt to push elections Democrat, as polls have shown for decades the younger people are, the more likely they are to vote Democrat.

13. Bans Keeping the Records Necessary for an Election Audit or Recount

In Section 1502, the bill would ban state and local officials from preserving the record of paper ballots that make trustworthy post-election recounts and audits possible. It states: ‘‘The voting system shall not preserve the voter-verified paper ballots in any manner that makes it possible, at any time after the ballot has been cast, to associate a voter with the record of the voter’s vote without the voter’s consent.”

14. Mandates Ballot Drop Boxes

In Section 1907, H.R. 1 would mandate that, beginning 45 days before an election, “In each county in the State, each State shall provide in-person, secured, and clearly labeled drop boxes at which individuals may, at any time during the period described in subsection (b), drop off voted absentee ballots in an election for Federal office.” This allows for the anonymous submission of absentee ballots outside of mail.

It is also a recipe for massive fraud, given that in 2020, when mail-in balloting was massively expanded, more than 26 million ballots were requested and never returned. Since this bill also requires all votes to be presumed valid, anyone could gather up any number of ballots that this law also requires to be mailed to all people listed in every government database, fill them out, and dump them in.

Tens of millions would be available for ventures like these. This bill would also legalize “ballot harvesting,” or authorizing one individual to collect such ballots and turn them in by the barrel.

Even if not one partisan in the entire United States is unscrupulous enough to take advantage of this big cheating opportunity, the mere existence of this possibility would seriously erode public confidence in elections. That should be reason enough for any honest person to oppose it.

15. Giving U.S. Territories Extra Democrat Seats in Congress and the Electoral College

H.R. 1 would form a commission to consider granting five U.S. territories voting rights, but not statehood. This is an open attempt to rig Congress and the presidency in favor of Democrats.

If these territories are granted House, Senate, and Electoral College seats, they could add as many as 10 senators and 18 new Electoral College votes, all almost assuredly filled with Democrats. Notice that at the current construction of the Senate, when a 60-vote majority is needed to pass most items of importance, this plan would give Democrats that insurmountable 60-vote majority to do whatever they want with no obstacles.

Since these remote islands are all welfare states that have chosen to remain dependent on U.S. taxpayer largess rather than developing self-government, they would be poor partners for the existing states, to say the least. Like usual, Democrats don’t even want to challenge them to self-governance. They just want to use them as dependents to expand their political power.

There’s a lot more in this bill, such as that its only limits on voting appear to be regarding absentee ballots for U.S. soldiers. This massive list is not a comprehensive examination.

It should suffice, however, to reveal how insane today’s Democrat Party is that every single House Democrat, save one, voted for this bill. This is a voting bill that only totalitarians seeking a uniparty nation could love.


at