Monday, January 25, 2021

Founder of #WalkAway Movement, Brandon Straka, Arrested For Participation in Capitol Hill Riot


Despite the weak evidence outlined in the indictment, this looks like a case of specific DOJ and FBI targeting of political voices.   The regime will not be opposed…

Brandon Straka was the founder of the #WalkAway movement.  He was also a key organizer for the Stop the Steal group during the January 6th political protest in Washington DC.

WASHINGTON DC – A prominent activist in the Stop the Steal movement who spoke at a rally held by backers of President Donald Trump in Washington the day before the storming of the Capitol was arrested on Monday on charges that he took part in the riot.

Brandon Straka, 44, was arrested on a felony charge of interfering with police during civil disorder. The self-described founder of a movement to “walk away” from liberalism was also charged with unlawful entry into a restricted building and disorderly conduct.

An FBI agent’s affidavit used to obtain a criminal complaint against Straka describes his role as an organizer of Stop the Steal and quotes his comments at the Jan. 5 rally held at Freedom Plaza, but doesn’t indicate whether the government views those activities as context for his actions at the Capitol or part of the alleged crimes.

FBI Special Agent Jeremy Desor said that videos revealed that during the melee, Straka was part of a crowd pushing toward a Capitol doorway. Desor doesn’t contend that Straka went into the building, but says that as others tried to charge through the entrance, the activist shouted: “Go! Go!”

Desor said that as a Capitol police officer tried to make his way through the crowd with a riot shield over his head, Straka urged others to wrestle it from him.  “Take it away from him,” Straka allegedly yelled. “Take it! Take it!”  (read more)

On January 8th Facebook took down Brandon Straka’s group without warning and without any citation for the reasoning.  On January 25th the DOJ files a criminal indictment against him????…..   Curiouser and Curiouser.


Chief Justice Roberts won’t preside over Trump Senate trial




Chief Justice John Roberts won’t preside over former President Donald Trump's Senate trial, Senate sources confirmed Monday. 

Instead, Democrat Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the Senate’s president pro tempore, will oversee the proceedings against Trump, who left office on Jan. 20. 

The House on Jan. 13 passed one article impeaching Trump for inciting an insurrection against the Capitol. 

But Trump is now gone from office.

The Constitution calls on the high court’s chief justice to preside over a Senate impeachment trial of the president. Roberts presided over Trump’s 2020 impeachment trial, which lasted nearly three weeks and resulted in his acquittal. 

But Roberts is not coming this time around.

The Constitution does not outline how to impeach an ex-president.

The missing instructions have left Senate leaders in both parties to devise their own rules, including who will preside over the trial.

They have chosen Leahy, the highest-ranking senator due to his tenure. 

"Sen. Leahy is expected to preside at trial," a Senate source told the Washington Examiner. "Senators preside when the impeached is not the president of the United States."

Leahy, 80, has served in the Senate since 1975, occasionally moonlighting as an actor. He starred in such Hollywood hits as Batman Forever and other installments in the series.


Democrats’ Version of Unity...

 https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/01/democrats_version_of_unity_means_us_against_them.html


Democrats' Version of Unity Means 'Us against Them'

Crooked politicians like to divide people, because they thrive on division.  Even when they try hard to utter "unity," it is as fake as the mainstream media.  When they have two propositions in a sentence, you need only to focus on their second one.  That's all that matters.

So here we are.  President Joe Biden's inaugural address began like a speech from heaven:

"This is a great nation.  We are good people."

"So, with purpose and resolve, we turn to those tasks of our time.  Sustained by faith.  Driven by conviction.  And devoted to one another and the country we love with all our hearts."

This is the first of the two propositions.  All is good.  All is well.  All is hopeful and inspiring —  until you hammer it with the second proposition, which reveals the true motive: an indictment of a portion of our population while at the same time perpetuating a victimhood mentality of another portion.

Biden then recited what he believes to be the historic crimes of the nation that torment a subset of the American people.  Among them are "political extremism," "white supremacy," and "domestic terrorism."

It's always division.  It's always a villain-victim framework — class warfare, whether by race or political ideology.

Just like death and taxes, socioeconomic differences are certain.  They happen in any society and even within families.  God doesn't give each and every person exactly the same amount of endowment.  What He gives to each and every person is a brain to think and discern his surrounding world, which can then help him achieve his life goals.

The real problem in America is not racism, but political corruption by the ruling elites from both parties.  It's not about economic or racial injustice deliberately designed by a certain racial background to exploit other people of different racial backgrounds.  It's true that some portions of the population are still struggling socioeconomically.  However, it's due to a combination of various factors, not the least of which is the failure of the most sacred institution in human life: family.  Socioeconomic malaise in our society generally stems from the failure of families as a fundamental institution that is supposed to inculcate constructive values and traits in our and future generations.

Politicians and political activists love to muddy the water.  As such, they take advantage of the situation by offering a wrong diagnosis and even worse solutions.  "Your suffering," they say, "is because of the injustice committed by another group of people."  There are villains out there, those who are different from you.

Having preached that wrong diagnosis, they then come up with a cunning solution: to give power to crooked politicians.  The result?  The problem still exists and may even be getting worse, but the crooked politicians stay in power for decades with lavish lifestyles.

How to overcome these evils — "political extremism," "white supremacy," and "domestic terrorism"?

True to himself as a longtime career politician (47 years in public office, mind you), Biden offered a non-solution solution: "unity is the path."

Quiz: How do you contradict yourself in one sentence or speech?  Ask a politician.  When you continually for decades disparage a group of people as villains and describe another group as victims, there is no unity in it.  It's all about revenge!

Don't take my word for it.  Take a look at this article on Thursday (Jan. 21) at the New York Times, amplifying the calls of people who think President Joe Biden's plan for unity needs to include "healing [that] requires holding perpetrators accountable."

"Mr. Biden should not pitch unity to those who oppose shared political power, they say, but should unite the country in defeating those who stand in the way," the author wrote.

And another, which comes from Dr. Jalane Schmidt, an activist and associate professor of religious studies at the University of Virginia who said:

We have a whole major political party that, too large of a section of it, supports undemocratic practices, voter suppression, and the coddling of these conspiracy theories.

So healing? Unity? You can't do that with people who don't adhere to basic democratic principles.

Their basic message is the same.  Unity is only with their ilk, but it's payback time for others.

It's power and revenge.  This is not surprising because the underlying theology of the left and the Democratic Party has been social justice, not true redemption and salvation.  The underpinning of that theology is socioeconomic class warfare, which essentially divides rather than unites people from diverse racial, ideological, and socio-economic backgrounds.  Politicians, especially the corrupt ones, will thrive under such circumstances.  For them, government is an all-encompassing solution, and the state is the only player.

It's no wonder that the left is not a big supporter of Jewish and Christian ideologies, which are rooted in individual empowerment through redemption granted by God and people's genuine connection with others.  In this framework, God's grace is an all-encompassing solution upon which all individual liberty and dynamics of human relationship are based.  Equipped with God's grace, each individual is a player in this world that can go about his business to pursue and create his own destiny within the confinement of God's commandments.  Because the God of the universe is the creator and the giver of life, all lives, not just some, matter.  In this case, the currency of life, as Martin Luther King said, is "character," which is inspired by people's relationship with God, not skin color.

Only through this ideological paradigm can we build and promote real unity.  Unfortunately, the left's message of unity is all about the former: "us against them," rooted in social justice theology, with race as currency.

Shama Tobin established Republic Report as a conservative counter to the left-leaning Drudge Report.  Check out the website at www.dailyrepublicreport.com.

Image: tomaszmichalkania via PixabayPixabay License.


Sarah Huckabee Sanders: The Trump defender enters political race

 

Known to millions around the world for her staunch defence of Trump from the press briefing room, now it's her turn to speak for herself.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders is back in the political game, announcing on Monday that she's running for the Republican nomination to be the governor of Arkansas in the 2022 election.

In true Trumpian fashion, his former White House press secretary broke the news in a video posted on Twitter.

Calling the job of governor the "last line of defence" against a federal government now in Democratic control, Sanders emphasised public safety, law enforcement and perceived censorship of conservative views in her eight-minute announcement.

"As governor, I will defend our right to be free of socialism and tyranny, your Second Amendment right to keep your family safe and your freedom of speech and religious liberty," she said. "Our state needs a leader with the courage to do what's right, not what's politically correct or convenient."

During her two-year tenure as White House press secretary, Sanders developed a reputation as an outspoken, and sometimes combative, voice for the Trump administration. 

 

 

She was cheered at Trump rallies and jeered by liberals, including serving as the butt of jokes at Michelle Wolfe's controversial 2018 White House Correspondents' Association dinner address and being denied service at a central Virginia restaurant because of the administration's gay-rights policies.

"I was the first White House press secretary to require Secret Service protection because of a credible violent threat against me," she said in her announcement. "We've seen violence in our streets, at a Congressional baseball practice and our Capitol. This is not who we are as Americans. To remain free, we must have law and order and resolve our differences peacefully."

 

 

Unlike many former presidential aides, Sanders' departure came with Trump's blessing - and a prediction that a future political career could be in the cards.

"She is a very special person with extraordinary talents, who has done an incredible job!" Trump wrote. "I hope she decides to run for Governor of Arkansas - she would be fantastic."

If elected, Sanders would follow in the footsteps of her father, Mike Huckabee, who served two terms as governor in the early 2000s (and ran for president twice, including against Trump in 2016). His political legacy and connections in the state could be an important boost for Sanders, who is seeking elective office for the first time.

 

 

To secure the nomination, she'll have to defeat two men, the current lieutenant governor and attorney general, who have already won statewide races.

Arkansas, like much of the US south, has moved from solidly Democratic to Republican in recent decades, although it took the state somewhat longer than the rest of the region to get there. It had a Democratic governor, Mike Beebe, from 2007 to 2015 and two Democratic senators as recently as 2010.

Trump, however, carried the mostly rural state by 26.92% in 2016 and 27.62% in 2020 - one of the few states where he improved his margin during his re-election campaign (Florida being the most notable case).

That suggests it could be fertile ground for Sanders' blend of Trumpian politics and in-state political pedigree. And it's not impossible to imagine a 2022 win in Arkansas as a springboard back into national politics. The Little Rock governor's mansion was the gateway to the White House for Bill Clinton, after all.

 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55801305?xtor=AL-72-%5Bpartner%5D-%5Bbbc.news.twitter%5D-%5Bheadline%5D-%5Bnews%5D-%5Bbizdev%5D-%5Bisapi%5D&at_custom4=2629A9FC-5F40-11EB-B5C9-26E54744363C&at_custom2=twitter&at_campaign=64&at_medium=custom7&at_custom3=%40BBCWorld&at_custom1=%5Bpost+type%5D 

 

 


 

Biden faces backlash after crushing border wall developments

 

OAN Newsroom

UPDATED 10:18 AM PT – Monday, January 25, 2020

Joe Biden recently discussed immigration on the southern border with the president of Mexico. On Friday, Biden spoke with Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador to outline his plan to reduce immigration by addressing its root causes.

Part of the new administration’s goal is to increase “lawful alternative immigration pathways.” Biden’s efforts includes a drastic overhaul of President Trump’s immigration policies, including stopping construction on the southern border wall.

“If President Biden says that a wall is no longer being built, that’s what he means,” stated the Mexican president. “In four years, zero.”

Meanwhile, Republicans are slamming Biden’s decision to halt progress on the border wall. Specially, House Minority Leader Kevin McMarthy (R-Calif.)  accused Biden of putting illegal immigrants before Americans.

“That is why I was disappointed to see within hours of assuming office, the new administration was more interested in helping illegal immigrants than helping our own citizens,” stated the Republican leader. “These are the wrong priorities at the wrong time; Americans need our help at home and that’s where our focus must remain.”

Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) took to Twitter to express her disappointment in Biden’s executive order, noting the wall helped prevent human trafficking and strengthened national security.

 

https://www.oann.com/biden-faces-backlash-after-crushing-border-wall-developments-2/ 

 

 


 

 

 

Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our
W3P Homepage

Mitt Romney Shares His Picks...

 Mitt Romney Shares His Picks for the Future of the GOP, and Laughter Abounds

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Mitt Romney made the rounds on the Sunday shows this morning. As expected, he was pressed on impeachment and took the opportunity to bash Donald Trump. At one point on Chris Wallace’s show, the host said it sounds like he’s going to vote to convict Trump, and Romney still couldn’t just be upfront, instead choosing to say he wants to hear the defense first. Yeah, I’m sure that’s going to change his mind.

Regardless, another topic also came up regarding who the future of the GOP will be over the next several years. Romney mentioned some names, and be warned, you may want to stop sipping your coffee before reading them. Here we go.

I’m trying to think of three worse names to put out there as the future of the party than Chris Christie, Larry Hogan, and Ben Sasse. Christie and Hogan are northeastern moderates who lack just about everything needed to bring the GOP voter base back to the table. Hogan, specifically, is pro-abortion, pro-gun control, and pro-crony capitalism. He’s like Mitt Romney if Mitt Romney stopped going to the gym. Meanwhile, Ben Sasse is the consummate do-nothing, rattling off statements from his office while never accomplishing anything of value. To the extent that any senator should be considered the new standard-bearer (I’m much more drawn to executive experience), a back-bencher like Sasse is not that person.

One thing these three all have in common is the sudden backbone they get when it’s time to go after their own party. Sasse was always good for an angry letter about Trump, while Hogan waddled to the podium often to express his discontent. Perhaps that’s why Romney likes them so much? You know who doesn’t like that, though? Republican voters don’t like that. They are sick and tired of seeing their own attack each other while giving Democrats a pass. If for no other reason than that alone, all three of the names Romney mentioned are completely disqualified.

As I’ve said before, the GOP has a choice to make. They can overreact to Trump’s tenure and swing back toward the Bush wing of the party, which includes figures like Larry Hogan, or they can pay attention to what their voters actually want. If they do the former, they aren’t gonna win 2022, much less 2024. But the stubbornness of the establishment knows no limits, so it wouldn’t surprise me at all if they try to push Hogan, Christie, and Sasse as the next generation of leadership. If they are smart, though, they won’t even entertain listening to what Romney has to say on this matter.


Guess Who Opposed Mail-In Voting...

 Guess Who Opposes Mail-In Voting in an Upcoming Election?

Guess Who Opposes Mail-In Voting in an Upcoming Election?

Despite the media's constant assurances that it's nearly impossible to commit voter fraud by mail, it seems billionaire Jeff Bezos and officials at Amazon disagree with that assertion. 

The online retailer is urging the National Labor Relations Board to reconsider a decision allowing 6,000 Amazon employees at the company's warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama, to vote by mail in an upcoming unionization vote. Amazon is seeking to postpone the election while the Labor Relations Board reviews the decision. 

According to a representative of the company who spoke to CNN, Amazon believes in-person voting is "the best approach to a valid, fair and successful election" because in-person voting allows "associates to verify and cast their vote in close proximity to their workplace." What a concept. 

"Amazon provided the NLRB with a safe, confidential and convenient proposal for associates to vote onsite which is in the best interest of all parties -- associate convenience, vote fidelity, and timeliness of vote count," Amazon spokeswoman Heather Knox said in the statement to CNN. "We will continue to insist on measures for a fair election, and we want everyone to vote, so our focus is ensuring that's possible."

Democrats pushed hard for mail-in-voting and other measures ahead of the November elections. The use of mail-in voting appears to have undermined confidence in the integrity of the results, as nearly 40 percent of likely voters believe that mail-in voting led to unprecedented fraud in the last election cycle, according to a poll.

Amazon came under fire earlier this week after sending a congratulatory letter to President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris. In the letter, the company volunteered its considerable resources to help the Biden administration with vaccine distribution efforts. Critics accused the company of playing politics, noting the company's failure to make such an offer during the Trump presidency. 


The River of Forgetfulness


Before we are all reprogrammed, remember for a bit longer that the reset of memory and truth is not just a political agenda, but a holistic effort to redefine our past, present, and future. 



Riotous rogue Trump supporters who broke into the Capitol on January 6 were properly and widely condemned by conservatives. They were somewhat reminiscent of the mobs of fanatic leftists and union members that a decade ago stormed the Wisconsin state capitol at Madison, or the unpunished hundreds of rioters who created havoc on Washington, D.C. streets during the Trump 2016 inauguration. We expect the Capitol stormers will be punished, and not in the lax fashion of the latter two groups that were not. 

Within a few days, the talking points were finalized that all of Donald Trump’s supporters deserved blame for the violence. That riot, the Trump defeat, and the loss of the Senate have greenlighted left-wing talk of “deprogramming,” “de-Baathification,” “re-educating,” and “reprogramming” half the country to ensure they think correctly and act properly from now on—the exact methodology of such brain rinsing apparently to be announced later. 

So we are beginning a great reprogramming of America. The construction of Trump and all of his supporters as abettors, terrorists, seditionists, and traitors is certainly proving useful. After the Capitol conundrum, we have seen over the past two weeks a coordinated and synchronized effort by Amazon, Twitter, and Google to destroy Parler, a small conservative-friendly rival to their social media and internet monopolies. More of such humanitarian taking care of business will follow—all as preemption for the most leftwing agenda in a half-century now rolling out. 

Round-up Time

Silicon Valley’s continued use of social activism to mask 19th-century robber-baron monopolization of its markets remains diabolically brilliant. After all, those who have rings in their noses, and wear tie-dye and flip-flops cannot have anything in common with either John D. Rockefeller, Jay Fisk,  or Big Brother, right? 

Don’t we remember how hipster Apple idealists once fought stodgy Microsoft? Or how liberal techies at Microsoft earlier took on dour, big blue, coat-and-tie IBM and “print” media? Surely, good Harvard drop-out tech revolutionaries cannot possibly have become bad, trillion-dollar corporate cartels? 

Serious Big Brother was never coming to America kicking and screaming in a suit and in a mile-long tie, but rather eagerly welcomed in with jeans and sneakers without socks. The First Amendment could always survive a crude, inebriated Joe McCarthy, but not so easily a social justice ex-barista, doing vanity selfies about diversity, egged on by the “progressive” media, while saving the planet, and “reining” in a hurtful, racist media.

Constitutional nihilists do not put up leaders with garish comb-overs and orange tans. Better to unconstitutionally use the FBI to surveil your enemies, catalog the communications of the press, and weaponize the IRS, when led by a “constitutional law professor” and an icon of the marginalized. 

Trump, as Public Enemy No. 1, was banned from Twitter for life and barred from most other social media indefinitely. So were many conservatives, some high-profile, some you’ve never heard of. Implicitly, we are asked to forget that “correct” rioters and looters this summer often coordinated their attacks on Facebook and bragged of them in real-time on Twitter.  

There are now social media categories of “good” bad and “bad” bad, depending on the age, flags, insignia, look, and fashion of the thugs. Good mobs hate Trump agendas, bad ones do not. Good “white” people who are programmed correctly vote for Biden; bad “white” people who voted for Trump need deprogramming. Again, how that would proceed presumably is under discussion.

The high-brow New York Times runs good fashion hype on the cool violent Antifa look; the low-brow New York Post of course does not run bad glamor encomia to the crazed violators of the Capitol. 

Meanwhile, foreign terrorist leaders like Ayatollah Ali Khamenei tweeted freely their death threats to Israel. In Internet wokespeak, to call for the death of millions is a mere statistic. 

Lest We Forget

We are expected to forget that for over 90 summer days, there was utter havoc in dozens of American cities. Downtowns were ravaged. Stores were looted. Arson was customary. More than 700 police were injured and spat upon. In all, those “mostly peaceful” protests did billions of dollars in damage, leaving thousands of business owners bankrupt, and at least three-dozen people dead.  

In other words, the visuals were the same old, same old we had seen during the violent 2017 Inauguration Day protests in Washington, the rioting in Ferguson and Baltimore, in New York during the final stages of the Occupy Wall Street take over, and the WTO violence over two decades ago in Seattle—with one major exception. This time the authorities saw far more election-year political advantage in defending the violence than in suppressing it, and so made the necessary adjustments, at least until Election Day.

The mayors of the targeted cities like Portland, Seattle, Chicago, and Minneapolis contextualized and supported the mayhem (“block party” and “summer of love”). They cared little for the thousands of lives that were wrecked by the destruction.

Joe Biden excused Antifa as a mere “idea” (a presidential ante facto impeachable offense?)—largely because millions of his supporters condoned or explained away the violence, and they said so publicly. The New York Times architect of the “1619 Project,” Nikole Hannah-Jones boasted at the height of the unrest, “Destroying property, which can be replaced, is not violence.” She’s lucky none of the oppressed took her literally or seriously enough to storm the New York Times. One wonders what is the further utility of BLM and Antifa after the Biden election, and whether erstwhile dead-ender “protestors” may now be recategorized as “rioters” given the suddenly bad optics.

Kamala Harris recklessly warned America that the protests, which were increasingly turning more violent, would and should continue. And that sentiment is precisely why Harris helped to bail out arrested street activists instead of raising funds for injured police. 



We are to forget all that because destroying the downtowns of major cities (mere “brick and mortar”) was then accepted tit-for-tat social justice. It was certainly not sedition, insurrection, and treason to try to torch a federal courthouse or incinerate police precincts with all their occupants inside. Slinging around an illegal “assault weapon,” if you were Seattle rapper Raz Simone, was almost cool and neat, even if four people were shot, and two killed in his “autonomous zone.” 

When the violence spread to the nation’s capital, a church near the White House was torched. Mobs threatened to enter the White House grounds. When the president raised the issue of employing federal troops in extremis, he was declared a near insurrectionary himself. 

Dozens of retired generals and admirals virtue signaled that Trump’s mention of federal troops was tantamount to plotting a coup. But we are to forget all that now because there were recently 30,000 troops in Washington—as if Jubal Early had risen from the dead with a Confederate Army. 

No retired or active general has warned us of a dangerous militarization of the nation’s capital that has no parallel since the Civil War. Were there so many troops in Washington because we learned our lessons from exempting the violence and rioting that we saw during the 2017 Inauguration when over 200 people were indicted for, and then excused from, felony rioting charges after hundreds of businesses were looted, vandalized, and destroyed? 

Are deprogrammed Americans asked to forget that all leaders should not suggest that violent resistance to the law is acceptable? 

When Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) railed at the doors of the Supreme Court amid a throng of furious pro-abortion protestors, called out the judges in session by name, and threatened and warned them that they were to reap a whirlwind and that they would have no idea of what might soon “hit” them, he later shrugged that he was speaking Brooklynese, the sort of rough patois he grew up with—as opposed, we must suppose, to Donald Trump’s Queens rough talk? Is Schumer to lead the Senate trial of Trump because he has the most congressional experience in threatening public officials while revving up a mob? 

What are we to do when everyone from Senator Jon Tester (D-Mt.) to Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J) to then-Vice President Joe Biden warned us that the only way to deal with Trump was either to get in his face or punch him or physically assault him? After deprogramming, are we to shout that Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) ignited violence, but Representative Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) wisely turned down the temperature?

For over a year, mobs and rioters have destroyed or defaced thousands of American monuments, and not just those of Confederate generals. We have witnessed attacks on everything from the Lincoln Memorial to statues of Frederick Douglass and Miguel de Cervantes

In fear, officials have removed iconic statues such as those of Theodore Roosevelt and Christopher Columbus. And in a manner worthy of Soviet Trotskyization, names and references have been wiped out from the collective American memory with no consistency or logic, with no vote of a city council, much less by public referenda. 

The Wilson Center at Princeton is now history; the Wilson Center at the Smithsonian is not—at least so far in this round of collective madness. Father Junipero Serra is no longer worthy of a small Stanford University named mall, even as Stanford itself is named after a 19th-century railroad tycoon who wrote racist diatribes, but without the compensating vows of penury of the now-banned priest. The logic of the Left? Canceling a long-dead Franciscan priest is not quite the same as changing the prestigious brand name on a ticket-to-success diploma. 

The only consistent logic in this massive hysterical iconoclasm is that names or statues that can easily be virtue-signaled away are canceled; and those in a strictly cost-to-benefit analysis that cannot, are not. So we offer sacrificial lambs to the mob to save more profitable or important pigs. 

The Waters of Lethe 

We are asked to be washed in the waters of obliviousness to forget that for four years the American public was subject to the greatest political hoax and scandal in American history. 

Candidate Hillary Clinton hired a foreign national, disguised by the firewalls of the DNC, Perkins-Coie, and Fusion GPS, to compile dirt on rival candidate Donald Trump. Then her minions used her lifelong government contacts to seed the made-up file by Christopher Steele among the highest echelons of the Obama Administration, the Justice Department, FBI, and CIA—with absolute impunity. 

We are asked to forget that the FBI deliberately doctored court evidence to greenlight unlawful surveillance, and lost or destroyed evidence and even the phone records of rogue FBI agents.

We are asked to forget that it is illegal for a foreign national like Christopher Steele to work for an American presidential candidate, much less to use his work to seek the destruction of a president-elect’s transition and presidency. 

We are asked to forget that good old Joe Biden has a long history of racial insensitivity, to such a degree his current vice president once denounced him for befriending segregationists in the Senate and opposing bussing. In the spirit of unity, we are asked to forget that Biden’s “Corn Pop” stories were racist to the core, that his “put y’all back in chains” trope was rank racial condescension, that his remarks about “clean” blacks and donut shop  owners were racist, and that his more recent slurs directed at black interviewers such as “Are you a junkie?” and “you ain’t black” were racist.  

We are now treated to Hollywood calls for unity. And that is all fine and good. But we are to forget that these ecumenicists for four years have boasted, in word and video, of beating the president up, of burning him alive, of decapitating him, of blowing him up, of shooting him, of torturing his children, of stabbing him. So that was then, this is now, the new age of unity and love?

We are to forget that even daring to voice worry about the sanctity of the 2020 election is in itself seditionary. We are to be deprogrammed to wipe away all memory that for years members of Congress and democratic grandees—including former president Jimmy Carter—described Trump as an illegitimately elected president. We are to forget that Hillary Clinton said repeatedly that she was robbed of her actual “victory,” and advised Joe Biden “never” to concede if he lost.  

We are to forget that the Left sued to nullify the 2016 election on grounds that voting machines were fraudulent. Hollywood stars ran commercials urging the electors to become insurrectionaries and to undermine their constitutional mandates. 

We are to forget how for years Stacey Abrams was feted by elected officials as the “real” governor of Georgia, as she insisted that she had been “cheated” out of her real victory. We are to forget that Democrats once warned that massive mail-in and early-voting might be subject to fraud. And let us be reprogrammed to forget too how Democrats sued and harangued to undermine the existing voting protocols passed by state legislatures, so that 100 million votes might be cast before Election Day.  

We are to forget because calling for symmetry and standards is now “Whataboutism,” the new charge of relativism from the relativist Left that for decades has said that prior injustice justifies present injustice. In sum, the deprogramming Left seeks to wash all memory away. In the cosmic quest for equity, justice, and diversity, there can be no fake absolute standards. For the Left, the moral ends are simply too exalted to worry about the means of obtaining them. Violence for equity is nonviolence. Rioting, arson, and looting in the service of justice is justice for the marginalized.  

Before we are all reprogrammed, remember for a bit longer that the reset of memory and truth is not just a political agenda, but a holistic effort to redefine our past, present, and future, to change not just what we think but how we think—or do not think.  

This desire to wash all memory away was the secret, after all, to Joe Biden’s virtual candidacy. The implicit promise was always just to vote for nothingness and then all the acrimony, all the rioting, all the fires and looting, all the media craziness, all the cancel culture, all the Twitter wars, all the hysteria would simply vanish with the disappearance of our Emmanuel Goldstein—and a new, undefined but far better world would take its place. And then at last you too could forget the past, and thereby come to love what you’ve become in the present.

The Arrival of the Ministry of Truth Is At Hand

 


“Smith, Winston Smith.”
The Arrival of the Ministry of Truth Is At Hand
 
Biden's Recent Action to Rescind the Past
Makes It Clear Where He Is Headed.

 
By Pem Schaeffer
23 January 2021

Every now and again, the cosmos align in a rare way, and my mind begins to chase after them, if only briefly. This is one of those moments, and it is not a happy one; in fact quite the opposite – one as troubling as any I can remember in my 78 years. We “celebrated” a major event in our democracy, and it was immediately followed by a discouraging (among many others) Presidential Order. Within hours, I had two related messages from scholars I revere and trust via email, and then an item in my USPS mailbox, which heaped mental Round-Up on what remained of my flagging optimism. I shall clarify the details momentarily.

But first, a moment of personal privilege. In moments like these, my mind did begin a chase, and it found a recollection of the famous Sean Connery scene, where all tuxed out, and just having lit a cigarette (when they still seemed debonair), he introduced himself as “Bond, James Bond,” a cinematic moment that will live forever if there is such a thing.

Sadly, my mind took that image and reworked it to a disheveled looking worker drone, introducing himself as “Smith, Winston Smith” with a despair made worse by his shabby coveralls. Smith is the protagonist in George Orwell's Novel 1984, and if your memories of it have faded, worry not. I will shortly use the item from my mailbox to refer you to the core details of Winston's plight and his attempt at finding escape with Julia.

Here is the sequence of events that brought me (and us) to this tragic point:

On September 17, 2020, America's Constitution Day, a gathering of notable scholars took place in the National Archives. It was broadcast live; I don't know if you saw it or not, but I did, and it was a magnificent and uplifting assemblage of patriots discussing the history of our founding, and how it had come under attack. I would suggest you see if you can find the video, but I worry it has been removed from the internet in the last few days. 

Following the scholarly discussion, President Trump announced that he was chartering a 1776 Commission to re-establish the beauty and nobility of the founding, and how it should be taught. Given the widespread attempts to eradicate our history and replace it with a 1619 Project sponsored by the New York Times, I was exhilarated by the events of the day.

Fast forward to January 20, 2021, when Joseph Biden was Inaugurated President. Later that day, one of the 17 Executive Orders he approved, almost all to reverse Trump Administration actions, “rescinded” the creation of the 1776 Commission the past September. My heart sunk. I instinctively assumed that they barely had time to gather and collaborate on any lasting work. I was, thankfully, to be pleasantly surprised.

I did a bit of searching and discovered that they had issued an initial report, dated January 21, 2021.....just a few days ago. Watching TV last night, I heard that Biden had not only rescinded the creation of the commission; he had rescinded their report issued that day. In essence, he declared it 'disappeared,' and in the process, took a major step down the path of rendering our actual history gone....down the memory hole. (It had taken only an instant for the usual suspects to declare it a racist diatribe of epic proportion.) The “Thought Police” have their new leader, and he's issued his first edict mere hours after ascending.

Fortunately, I had already downloaded the report. I have not yet read it, but it is high priority in my reading stack. It wouldn't surprise me if it has been disappeared from the internet by the Ministers of big tech, who must now approve all submissions that seek to be posted there. The remainder of this column will provide two links to it; if neither works, contact me by email and I will send it to you.

As soon as I saw Biden's action, I thought of preparing an item to run on Rip McIntosh's service, but when I checked my email, Victor Davis Hanson, an eminent scholar and member of the now-defunct commission, had already posted an essay on it which Rip had already posted, and you may find here  https://conta.cc/3qJYlzc .

Then before the blink of an eye, I had an email from Hillsdale College President Larry Arnn, who was the Chair of the panel at its September 17th meeting, and then Chair of the Commission as it prepared its report. Arnn is a brilliant scholar of History, and especially our founding and its documents. Here is Larry Arnn's email:


Dear Friend of Hillsdale College,

I was proud last year to accept President Trump’s appointment to chair the President’s Advisory 1776 Commission. Also appointed to the Commission was Victor Davis Hanson, the Wayne and Marcia Buske Distinguished Fellow in History here at Hillsdale. Matthew Spalding, dean of our Van Andel Graduate School of Government in Washington, D.C., served as the Commission’s executive director.


The Commission issued its 1776 Report this past Monday. The report calls for a return to the unifying principles stated in the Declaration of Independence. It quotes the greatest Americans, black and white, men and women, in devotion to these principles. It acknowledges the many ways we have fallen short of them even as it celebrates, following Abraham Lincoln, the influence for good that they exercised to the benefit of all. It acknowledges the way we fall short of them today and argues that it is only by returning to them that our current evils can be corrected. It calls for a civics education that fosters reverence for these principles, beginning with an accurate and honest teaching of American history. It is not a partisan document.

The Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, and other publications have made positive note of the report. The New York Times, the Washington Post, and other mainstream media organizations condemned the report, almost entirely for things it does not say. On Wednesday, the 1776 Commission was abolished by one of President Biden’s first executive orders.

I invite you to read the report here: https://info.hillsdale.edu/1776-commission

I think the report will endure because it speaks of principles that are fixed and enduring. Since 1844, Hillsdale College has taught and defended these principles. We will continue to do so, come what may. At a time of such deep division in our country, these principles offer the only hope of uniting all Americans.

==========================================

I could not imagine two more informed scholars and advocates for compiling a truly worthy history of the American founding, aided by a distinguished cadre of fellow learned minds who have a passion for the origins of our nation.

Then, dum-da-dum-dum, the final shoe dropped in this cosmic alignment. My latest issue of Imprimis, published by Hillsdale, arrived yesterday. This one happens to be written by Arnn, and the issue is dated December 2020. The title of Arnn's presentation is Orwell's 1984 and Today. I don't know about you, but I had “read” the book in high school more than 60 years ago. For some reason, a year or two ago (mostly the use of “Orwellian” in numerous articles, I think), I decided I needed to read it again, so I ordered a copy that would not fall apart in my hands.

Sometime last summer, I decided to take in on. I got in about 20% of the way, and couldn't sustain my attention. Arnn's Imprimis discourse, which you can find here: https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/orwells-1984-today/, changed all that. Keep in mind that he wrote it well before the cancellation by Biden of the 1776 Commission, and its report issued just before the guillotine fell.

As I read Professor Arnn's discourse, I saw Orwell's theory in an entirely new light.....one where Biden had summarily ordered the Commission’s existence and its report “down the memory hole.” The review of the main concept of the novel was chilling in a way I never anticipated. As they say, “timing is everything,” and reading Imprimis in the aftermath of Biden's ascension to the Presidency, and his immediate and sweeping action to eliminate the history of Trump's actions and achievements was chilling, to say the least.

Add to the mix the repetitive mention by various and sundry “sources” that Trump voters (“cultists”) need to be “deprogrammed,” which is to say reprogrammed. And the clear intimation by Rep. AOC that she would like to head a new “Ministry of Truth” charged with discerning what should appear in the media and what shouldn't, and you have a revelation of what lies ahead. 

We’re going to have to figure out how we rein in our media environment so that you can’t just spew disinformation and misinformation,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) told her Instagram followers this week. “It’s one thing to have differing opinions but it’s another thing entirely to just say things that are false. So that’s something that we’re looking into.

Both are entirely in keeping with Orwell's conceptualization, and Arnn's prescient warnings before the great cancellation and abolition of America's historical record became official.

I urge you all to read Arnn's Imprimis item immediately, followed by the 1776 Report referenced above. They should be more than enough to drive you to read or reread 1984. If you need a new copy, you better order it immediately, before it goes down the Amazon cancellation hole, and disappears from library shelves. 

The time has come to be afraid, very afraid. 
If we aren't “careful,” the elites in the Inner and Outer Parties (the Swamp of the Trump era) could soon issue orders declaring us all Winston's and Julia's. And we will be forced to embrace the revealed “truths” that Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength.

This may seem alarmist as you read it, but I submit that the events of recent months and the writings referred to herein, argue that it is not. Feel free to let me know if you agree.