Monday, January 11, 2021

Orwell Was Right – Facebook Will Remove Content With ‘Stop The Steal’ Phrase


“It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words” … “The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect.”

― George Orwell

In the latest effort to ensure the totalitarian interests of the authoritarian state are never questioned, Facebook has announced no phrases will be allowed that call into question the legitimacy of the installed JoeBama leadership.  This is absolutely Orwellian:

(Reuters) – Facebook Inc said on Monday it was treating the next two weeks as a “major civic event” and would remove certain content containing the phrase “stop the steal” from its social media platforms.

“With continued attempts to organize events against the outcome of the US presidential election that can lead to violence, and use of the term by those involved in Wednesday’s violence in DC, we’re taking this additional step in the lead up to the inauguration”, the company said in a blog post.  (read more)

The need to have extreme control is a reaction to fear.


Parler Sues Amazon, Asks Court to Reverse Illegal 'Death Blow'

 

Article by Tyler O'Neil in PJMedia
 

Parler Sues Amazon, Asks Court to Reverse Illegal 'Death Blow'

On Monday, Parler filed a lawsuit against Amazon, accusing the company of breaching its contract and violating a century-old antitrust law by promoting Twitter at its competitor’s expense. Amazon had removed Parler from its servers on Monday morning, claiming the conservative social media platform refused to remove posts advocating violence at the Capitol riots last Wednesday.

Due to Amazon’s removal, “Parler will be offline for a financially devastating period,” the lawsuit claims. It alleges that Amazon applied a double standard, breaking its contract with Parler over a small number of posts while preserving its ties with Twitter, where threats of violence reached into the thousands on Friday.

Amazon acted just as conservatives were flocking from Twitter to Parler, following Twitter’s ban of President Donald Trump’s accounts.

“Given the context of Parler’s looming threat to Twitter and the fact that the Twitter ban might not long muzzle the President if he switched to Parler, potentially bringing tens of millions of followers with him, AWS moved to shut down Parler,” the lawsuit alleges.

Oddly, Amazon leaked the story of Parler’s termination to BuzzFeed more than an hour before it bothered to inform Parler itself. BuzzFeed reported that AWS would remove Parler at 11:59 p.m. Pacific time Sunday night, in an article published at 6:07 p.m. Pacific on Saturday. Amazon did not email Parler about the termination until 7:19 p.m. Pacific, “meaning AWS leaked the letter to BuzzFeed before sending it to Parler.”

Parler’s contract with AWS stipulated that AWS must give notice 30 days before the termination of a contract.

AWS’s “death blow … could not come at a worse time for Parler—a time when the company is surging with the potential of even more explosive growth in the next few days.”

Yet “worse than the timing is the result—Parler has tried to find alternative companies to host it and they have fallen through. It has no other options. Without AWS, Parler is finished as it has no way to get online,” the lawsuit notes.

A delay of “even one day” in the court granting a restraining order and forcing Amazon to resurrect Parler’s account “could also sound Parler’s death knell as President Trump and others move on to other platforms. It is no wonder, then, that competitor Twitter’s CEO has heartily endorsed efforts to remove Parler from the public sphere.”

The lawsuit argued that AWS engaged in a clear double standard by attacking Parler. “By pulling the plug on Parler but leaving Twitter alone despite identical conduct by users on both sites, AWS reveals that its expressed reasons for suspending Parler’s account are but pretext,” it claims.

The lawsuit notes that Amazon claimed to find 98 examples of posts that clearly encourage and incite violence on Parler. “However, the day before, on Friday, one of the top trends on Twitter was ‘Hang Mike Pence,’ with over 14,000 tweets. … And earlier last week, a Los Angeles Times columnist observed that Twitter and other social media platforms are partly culpable for the Capital [sic] Hill riot, by allowing rioters to communicate and rile each other up.”

“Yet these equivalent, if not greater, violations of AWS’s terms of service by Twitter have apparently been ignored by AWS,” the lawsuit notes, bitterly.

Parler brings three claims against Amazon. It accuses AWS of violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act by “contracting or conspiring to restrain trade or commerce.” It accuses AWS of breach of contract “by not providing thirty days’ notice before terminating its account.” Finally, it accuses Amazon of “tortious interference with a contract or business expectancy.” By terminating Parler’s contract, “AWS will intentionally interfere with the contracts Parler has with millions of its present users, as well as with the users it is projected to gain this week.”

Parler has over 12 million users under contract, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit asks the Washington State district court to issue a temporary restraining order and an order forcing AWS to maintain Parler’s account until further notice from the court. It also seeks treble damages for the egregious attack on Parler’s ability to do business.

The lawsuit appears to be on firm footing, and it seeks an order as soon as possible. Stay tuned for more news on this.

Amazon also faces at least one lawsuit for excluding conservative and Christian nonprofits from its charity program, Amazon Smile, relying on the scandal-plagued far-left smear factory the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The SPLC has long pressured Big Tech companies to blacklist conservative organizations that the SPLC falsely smears as “hate groups” and lists along with the Ku Klux Klan. A similar bias may be at work in this situation.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2021/01/11/breaking-parler-sues-amazon-asks-court-to-reverse-illegal-death-blow-n1331525 


Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


First Lady Melania Trump: Our Path Forward

 

Like all of you, I have reflected on the past year and how the invisible enemy, Covid-19, swept across our beautiful country. All Nations have experienced the loss of loved ones, economic pain, and the negative impacts of isolation.

As your First Lady, it has been inspiring to witness firsthand what the people of our great Nation will do for one another, especially when we are at our most vulnerable.

With nearly every experience I have had, I found myself carrying many individual’s stories home with me in my heart.

Most recently, my heart goes out to: Air Force Veteran, Ashli Babbitt, Benjamin Philips, Kevin Greeson, Roseanne Boyland, and Capitol Police Officers, Brian Sicknick and Howard Liebengood. I pray for their families comfort and strength during this difficult time.

 

 

I am disappointed and disheartened with what happened last week. I find it shameful that surrounding these tragic events there has been salacious gossip, unwarranted personal attacks, and false misleading accusations on me – from people who are looking to be relevant and have an agenda. This time is solely about healing our country and its citizens. It should not be used for personal gain.

Our Nation must heal in a civil manner. Make no mistake about it, I absolutely condemn the violence that has occurred on our Nation’s Capitol. Violence is never acceptable.

As an American, I am proud of our freedom to express our viewpoints without persecution. It is one of the paramount ideals which America is fundamentally built on. Many have made the ultimate sacrifice to protect that right. With that in mind, I would like to call on the citizens of this country to take a moment, pause, and look at things from all perspectives.

I implore people to stop the violence, never make assumptions based on the color of a person’s skin or use differing political ideologies as a basis for aggression and viciousness. We must listen to one another, focus on what unites us, and rise above what divides us.

 

 

It is inspiring to see that so many have found a passion and enthusiasm in participating in an election, but we must not allow that passion to turn to violence. Our path forward is to come together, find our commonalities, and be the kind and strong people that I know we are.

Our country’s strength and character have revealed themselves in the communities that have been impacted by natural disasters and throughout this terrible pandemic that has affected all of us. The common thread in all of these challenging situations is American’s unwavering resolve to help one another.  Your compassion has shown the true spirit of our country.

As I said over the summer, it is these defining moments that we will look back and tell our grandchildren that through empathy, strength, and determination, we were able to restore the promise of our future. Each of you are the backbone of this country. You are the people who continue to make the United States of America what it is, and who have the incredible responsibility of preparing our future generations to leave everything better than they found it.

 

 

It has been the honor of my lifetime to serve as your First Lady. I want to thank the millions of Americans who supported my husband and me over the past 4 years and shown the incredible impact of the American spirit. I am grateful to you all for letting me serve you on platforms which are dear to me.

Most importantly, I ask for healing, grace, understanding, and peace for our great Nation.

Every day let us remember that we are one Nation under God. God bless you all and God bless the United States of America.

Sincerely,

 

 Melania Trump

 

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/first-lady-melania-trump-path-forward/ 

 

 


 

 

 

Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our
W3P Homepage

Trump Administration to Designate Cuba a State Sponsor of Terror


Article in NewsMax
 

Trump Administration to Designate Cuba a State Sponsor of Terror

The Trump administration will place Cuba back on the list of state sponsors of terrorism on Monday, according to two senior State Department officials, reversing an Obama-era decision and making it harder for President-elect Joe Biden to quickly revive diplomatic ties with Havana.

Secretary of State Michael Pompeo is expected to indicate he’s designating Cuba because the country continues to harbor American fugitives including Joanne Chesimard, convicted of killing a New Jersey state trooper in 1973, and refuses a Colombian extradition request for National Liberation Army members linked to a 2019 bombing that killed 22.

Cuba joins only Syria, Iran and North Korea -- nations more widely condemned for fomenting terrorism -- on the U.S. list. Cuba had originally been put on the list in 1982 but was removed by President Barack Obama in 2015 as he sought to improve economic and diplomatic relations with the Caribbean nation.

Biden has indicated he wants to revive the Obama-era policy of easing economic and travel restrictions in hopes that closer ties and more capitalism will pave the way for democratic change in Cuba. That strategy could include reducing restrictions on travel, investment and remittances for the island nation that are perceived to disproportionately hurt Americans and ordinary Cubans.

Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. labeled Cuba part of a “Troika of Tyranny” with Nicaragua and Venezuela. His moves were popular with Cuban-Americans in Florida, a state Trump won in his re-election bid with the help of Cuban-American refugees, Venezuelan-Americans and other anti-Communist Latino voters.

His administration had been mulling the terrorism-sponsor move for months. Two senior State Department officials, who asked not to be identified discussing internal deliberations, said politics played no role in the decision to re-designate Cuba and said several administrations -- including Obama’s -- had made policy decisions about the island late in their presidencies.

The officials said the process of getting Cuba back on the list was a lengthy one and if the U.S. had wanted to play politics, it would have re-designated Cuba before the November presidential election, not after.

The administration had signaled as far back as May that it might restore the designation on Cuba. That was when officials announced Cuba was back on a separate list of nations not cooperating fully with U.S. counterterrorism efforts over its refusal to extradite the National Liberation Army members.

According to the State Department, state sponsors of terror are countries that have “repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism.” One of the officials said there is legal precedent dating back to the presidency of George H. W. Bush for keeping a country on the list for harboring terrorists even if it isn’t actively supporting terrorist acts.

Cuba and the U.S., enemies after the late Fidel Castro took power in 1959, established diplomatic relations in 2015 when Obama was president and Biden was vice president. The U.S. eased a five-decade trade embargo and took other steps toward normalization, although a complete end to U.S. restrictions would require an act of Congress.

Despite nascent openings and increasing foreign investment since the 1990s, Cuba’s economy remains heavily controlled by the government and the military.

During Trump’s term, he opened the door for lawsuits against companies benefiting from property confiscated by the government in Cuba, prohibited educational trips and cruises there and limited direct flights. Biden could move to take Cuba off the terrorist list, but a formal review could delay the process by several months and rekindle debate about Cuba’s Communist leaders.

https://www.newsmax.com/headline/cuba-state-sponsor-terror/2021/01/11/id/1005089/





Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


Questions for Democrats

 

Article by M.W. Gail in The American Thinker
 

Questions for Democrats

Now that the steal is complete, President Biden is coming into office on January 20, 2021. That said, I’m going to need some help from my Democrat friends with some questions from a former Deplorable.

1. Do I have to accept the election results, or can I cry for four years, claiming election interference?

2. Who do I contact to see if Republicans are boycotting the inauguration, as the Democrats did for President Trump?

3. Can I borrow the #NotMyPresident hashtag or is that reserved for President Trump?

4. Am I entitled to see Biden’s tax returns to learn how his income jumped dramatically in one year? (I mean, we all know the how and the why. Just looking for the proof.)

5. Am I allowed to trash talk anything that Biden says, without repercussion, because I’m just expressing myself and can I hang a decapitated Biden head in effigy or is that verboten?

6. Is there a sign-up somewhere for riots, do organizers call me, or how does that work, since I didn’t get my way?

7. Will Soros pay me if I troll Democrat sites or does that only work one-way?

8. Speaking of Soros trolls, are businesses targeted because they support Biden, or do I just pick a business that has something I want to take home for free?

9. By the way, does all the free stuff your party has promised just come straight away, or do I have to quit my job first?

10. Where are the safe spaces? Is there a map or something? I may need to go cry for a little while (because of how stupid our country has become). Can I also get a kitty to pet? It helps calm me down.

11. When my 401K crashes, will President Biden make up for that in give-a-ways or am I just screwed?

12. Since socialism is what you just voted in if my neighbor has something I want, do I just take it or do I have to let him know I’m taking it? (Personally, I have had my eye on the brand spanking new Mercedes SUV, a couple of doors down, at the house with the Biden sign in its yard.)

13. When gas hits the Obama high-water mark of six bucks a gallon (or more), is there an EBT card for that? Maybe a check from Soros?

14. I have seen the gatherings of conservatives protesting the election results, but something is wrong because nothing is getting destroyed. Did you guys go to a class for that, or could you provide some pointers on how to do it right, please?

15. The conservative gatherings were dubbed super spreader events by the Democrat media, yet the Democrats’ protests and election gatherings were not and are not. Did you guys secretly come out with the vaccine?

16. So, now that Biden was selected, er, elected, is every death now on him, or is it still Trump's fault?

17. Lastly, during Biden's State of the Union Address, is Nancy Pelosi going to tear up the speech on national television, or does she only do that with President Trump?

Thanks in advance for clearing up my confusion, comrades. As a good future socialist, I want to make sure that I toe all of the politically correct lines coming our way soon and work to be a shining example of globalism. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/01/questions_for_democrats_.html





Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


Joe Biden pledges to defeat the NRA

 

OAN Newsroom

UPDATED 7:15 AM PT – Monday, January 11, 2021

Joe Biden’s agenda for increased gun control has hit peak intensity after he made his intentions clear to turn Americans’ right to purchase firearms into an over-regulated nightmare, all while opulent politicians are free to keep their armed security.

In a blanket statement Friday, the former vice president vowed to “defeat the NRA” and fulfill the radical left’s gun control wish list. As a so-called solution to gun violence, he has vowed to pass even more background check requirements as well as a ban on so-called assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.

This comes in spite of strongly increasing gun violence in American cities that already have these measures in place.

 

 

Specifically, Democrat-led Chicago wrapped up 2020 with more than 4,000 shooting victims and 769 gun-related homicides. According to a police report, the city saw more bloodshed in one year in over two decades as well as a 139 percent surge of murder in July 2020 compared with July 2019.

Meanwhile, Chicago boasted some of the strictest gun control measures in the country. This includes a ban on most semi-automatic rifles and high capacity magazines as well as a requirement of heavy background checks, a firearm owners identification card requirement, waiting periods, gun owner licensing and many more regulatory measures.

Regardless, Biden has continued to pose increased gun restrictions as a so-called solution despite stacks of evidence that assert it’s counter-productive to ending gun violence.

In an interview with Anderson Cooper, Biden was probed about whether he would come for Americans’ guns if he was elected to the White House.

“Bingo, you’re right…if you have an assault weapon, the fact of the matter is, they should be illegal. Period,” he stated.
“I would institute a national buyback program and I would make sure that is what we do, to get them off the street.”

Furthermore, at a campaign rally in South Carolina last February, he criticized the protection of lawful commerce in Arms Act, which protects gun manufacturers from being held liable for crimes committed with guns they produced.

“We passed a bill in 2007 that exempted, exempted gun manufacturers from being sued…the only industry that in America, that is exempt,’ said Biden. “Well, I got news for ya gun manufacturers: I’m coming for you and I’m gonna take you down.”

 

 

 

He added, the first thing he will do as president is work to get rid of that measure and strongly increase gun control across the board. Meanwhile, President Trump has warned about the growing efforts of the radical left to disarm American citizens.

“They attack the Second Amendment every single day while employing armed guards,” he stated. “And let me tell you, I am the only thing standing in the way of you and your Second Amendment. It’s under siege.

While it is evident that violent crime is a problem that needs to be addressed, recent statistics show that increased gun control has failed to solve the problem.

 

 

https://www.oann.com/joe-biden-pledges-to-defeat-the-nra/ 

 

 


 

Death of Capitol Police Officer After Protest May Not Be as Initially Reported



The death of Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick was a tragedy.

But as it turns out, the facts originally reported about his death may not have been accurate.

The initial story implied that he died from an attack by protesters at the Capitol, it was even reported that he was hit with a fire extinguisher. Apparently though, the facts as of this moment are not there to confirm that claim. Yet that has gone everywhere as “facts.”

Indeed, according to ABC, they are reporting that Sicknick’s death may have been “driven by a medical condition.”

According to sources familiar with the matter, authorities believe Sicknick’s death was driven by a medical condition. They’re also investigating reports that he was attacked with a fire extinguisher or another item at the Capitol, sources said. So far, reports of an attack haven’t been confirmed and authorities are hoping to locate video or other imagery from the scene.

He did not die until after he had returned to his office where he collapsed and was later taken to the hospital where he died around 9:30 p.m.

Sicknick’s family said in a statement, “Many details regarding Wednesday’s events and the direct causes of Brian’s injuries remain unknown and our family asks the public and the press to respect our wishes in not making Brian’s passing a political issue.”

Agreed. Now his death may have been been related to interactions with the protesters, but we should wait until the evidence is in. People are being whipped up based on unconfirmed or outright false reports, in a highly charged political climate.

Meanwhile, folks on the left on Twitter are spreading a video which they allege is Sicknick being beaten to death by Trump supporters, after his family asked people not to make his passing political. It isn’t him and it’s not entirely clear what the video shows. This is just vile and wrong to make false claims about his death.

Officer Liebengood, who is mentioned there, committed suicide.

Sicknick was a 42-year-old military veteran who had wanted to be a police officer his entire life and had worked for the Capitol Police for 12 years. We should condemn anyone who had a hand in his death.

Recognize that here is a man who dedicated his life to law enforcement. Honor his service and his memory. Don’t use his death for a political point.


#FreeSpeechMonday and Deplatforming Amerika

 

Article by Kevin McCullough in Townhall
 

#FreeSpeechMonday and Deplatforming Amerika

Wouldn’t it be interesting if say Monday the futures for Apple, Amazon, Google and Twitter suddenly had market whiplash?

The technology conglomerates in recent days have acted exclusively like editorial outlets. They have committed direct fiduciary negligence against their stock holders. And they seem to have forgotten that, to at least some degree, the people they are mistreating now are also the ones that helped drive their success on the Nasdaq this year. 

In fact, in a year when the average American had great economic success last January and February—many of us had to scrap and claw for most of the rest of the year to get to even. Sadly, there remain many who have not gotten back to square one. 

But not so for Tim Cook, Jeff Bezos, Larry Page and “Jack.” Nope. For these ringwraiths there would come no sacrifice, just a lot of money and a record year. Add Zuckerberg to the mix and these companies kept the Nasdaq above water almost all by themselves for 2020.

Power corrupts though, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Big Tech seems to believe that they are above us minions. They pour money into elections—wrongfully attached to conditions on how the election is carried out. When the plebs speak up, they turn a deaf ear. No one holds them accountable.

You certainly can’t have a president in office who calls attention to all that they are going to rig all of life against a consumer—much less a little election engineering. And at the first sign that “their people” are poised to have unchecked power—even for only two years—the five of you shred the Constitution, attack the one who’s kept things honest, and put a knife to the throat of the everyday American.

What America has turned into—Amerika—in the last 72 hours resembles the technological equivalent of Cuba, China, and the old Soviet Union. 

Most recently when Venezuela was finally able to get the people just hooked long enough on government dependency Chavez/Maduro et al figured out ways to keep it from ever returning it to the hands of the people.

Amerika will be harder to control because of Ameri-c-ans. Close to 80 million believe that the past pair of elections weren’t anything close to fair, free or transparent. And all 80 million condemned the 58 people arrested who tore up our beloved Capitol this week.

Rumor has it that even that big tax hikes are on the way. As such tech stock may not be all that attractive—especially if Joe Biden keeps his word to print up to $10 trillion additional paper dollars this year. 

But make no mistake, as shareholders—either independently or through our 401k mutual funds—we are not required to keep faith in companies that willfully take actions that undermine our fiscal good.

One smallish Twitter account that got deplatformed this week with only 150k followers had driven 210 million impressions for them in the final 60 days of 2020. Rush Limbaugh’s platform was six times that size. Add Levin, Team Trump, Don Jr, Lou Dobbs, dozens more and even the two POTUS accounts and you’re looking at billions of impressions, the traffic that goes with them, and hence the profitability. 

Not only that you are essentially giving your competitors that “value” as well. 

It’s a great wager to be sure, but what if shareholders suddenly realize that they don’t have to put up with activist CEOs who appear to be working counter to the interest of their own fiduciary obligations? 

Wouldn’t putting that money even into the two commodities (gold/silver) that beat the Nasdaq in 2020 make more sense? 

So what if Monday rolled around and the great #FreeSpeechSellOff went down? What if the five headless horsemen suddenly were reminded that they aren’t free to rid the earth of opinions they simply don’t care for?

What if...

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2021/01/10/freespeechmonday-and-deplatforming-amerika-n2582886 


Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


The Lib-Fascist Purge


Article by Kurt Schlichter in Townhall
 

The Lib-Fascist Purge

I’m not sure which is my favorite aspect of this disgraceful and dangerous festival of bans, gagging, and silencing that the Establishment embarked upon last week after it finally discovered one kind of riot it didn’t approve of. Maybe it was the journalists cheering censorship. Maybe it was True Conservatives™ like that geek from National Review giving censorship a soft, girlish thumbs-up – perhaps if the libs shut down the competition then people will sign up for NR’s cruises again. Ahoy! Or maybe it was the ACLU trying to balance the realization that having corporations not totally control what people say is bad with the imperative that Orange Man Bad.

So many beclownings to choose from. 

Oh wait, I forgot the promiscuous use of terms like “insurrectionist” and “sedition,” coming after four years of putting “treason” out on the street to work the corners. Well, if standing up to the fascist Establishment is those things now, you’ll find they just don’t carry the stigma the Establishment is hoping for anymore. In Orwellian America, the meaning of words change as needed. “Capitalism” has changed too – if this Chi Com-smooching corporatist oligarchy is “capitalism,” then I’m something else.

They want to impeach the president too, and certainly a few GOP invertebrates will go along with it. The idea is not to hold him accountable for some imagined “incitement” – being lectured about fomenting mobs by that withered hag Maxine Waters, whose mess I had to clean up when I mobilized for the LA riots (excuse me, “LA Rebellion”), is almost too funny – but to humiliate you, to try and tar him historically, and to bar him from running again.

As usual, they are stupid. No one’s getting humiliated since this gambit will fail in the Senate, the certain vote of Mitt (R?-Miracle Whip) in solidarity with the people who accused him of wanting to reimpose slavery notwithstanding. It won’t tar Trump historically – I was never one for the “History’s gonna judge you harshly if you don’t embrace my policy preferences” flex anyway, but Trump’s amazing term cries out for a fresh take in the future by a historian not terrified that his history department is going to fire him for thinking unapproved thoughts.

And barring Trump from running? Say, wouldn’t people concerned with democracy leave the evaluation of Trump’s behavior and suitability for future office to the voters? Yes – next question. 

Regardless, besides it being malicious, it’s kind of dumb. No more Trump candidacy? Yeah, go ahead and throw the GOP in that briar patch. Right off, Trump starts with about 50% of people hating his guts, and everyone of them will vote. That’s not to say he could not win the GOP primary. He would, especially up against the likes of tiresome, two-faced Jeb! floppelganger Nikki! Haley. In the last week, she flip-flopped from “Trump will be judged harshly by history” (there’s that hack cliché again) to “Silencing people, not to mention the President of the US, is what happens in China not our country. #Unbelievable.” How about #NeverNikki! instead? Regardless, you gotta admire her flexibility, since, like Kamala grooving on Willie Brown, albeit figuratively, Nikki! does what she thinks she has to do to scramble up the ladder. Also, Trump would beat Tom Cotton because of Cotton’s newfound support from the New York Times, which recently fully embraced his idea of turning the Army on political protesters.

No, Trump would likely be the nominee if he wanted to be (an open question), but his chances in the general are slim. With ~50% of folks against him to start, he’s got to run the table even in a fair election (Yeah, right, “fair”…what’s that knock on my door? The FBI? Wants to interrogate me for daring to question the fairness of an election?). A successful impeachment takes the Trump factor and its attendant risks out of the equation but leaves him as kingmaker and motivator. But they get the feels, so the hell with strategy. Like I said, they’re stupid.

And evil. 

You know they hate you, right? Really and truly, and they want you silenced, disenfranchised, and dead if necessary. That woman the federal cop shot on video in the Capitol, capped for trespassing, was expendable and so are you. Now, one might be accused of “whataboutism” for this next part, but whataboutism is a moral necessity that highlights the lies that form the foundation of our garbage Establishment, and therefore it must be constantly and loudly practiced. What about all those people killed on video whose deaths sparked riots? Now, the initial read on the shooting seems bad, but being the wacky nonconformist rebel I am, I’ll wait until all the facts are in to make a final judgment and just say at present that the shooting looks questionable. But no one will ask the questions. The cop will be cleared and will never, ever be charged, and even if President Biden’s* U.S. Attorney in the forthcoming State of D.C. were to file charges (LOL, sometimes I even make myself laugh), let’s just say I put the chances of a D.C. jury convicting at about O.J. level.

Standard Status: Double.

So, the Establishment has decided to address the grievances of people who feel disenfranchised, silenced, and subjected to double standards with much more disenfranchisement, silencing, and double standards. Seems like an on-brand move for the most corrupt, unwise, and incompetent – yet remarkably arrogant – ruling caste America has ever known. Good plan – deny them the right to pick their 2024 president, clap like trained seals as corporate overlords cut off their ability to express themselves, and continue to treat their own supporters well and dissenters much, much worse. That’s sustainable. Say, let’s put out this blazing fire with this handy can of gasoline.

Yeah, they are having fun for now. While the supine GOP is tweeting hack cliches about Muh Not Who We Are, the left is trying to tighten the noose. But we’re woke. Rasmussen puts Trump’s popularity at 51%, rising after the riots. We aren’t blaming Trump for the riots. And we sure aren’t rolling over for these bastards.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2021/01/11/the-libfascist-purge-n2582903 


Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


Crazy 2020 is Dead! Long Live Crazier 2021!

Hang on. It is going to be Mr. Toad’s wild scary ride for all of 2021.


The proper conservative response to last Wednesday’s violent entry into the Capitol and vandalism, as well as assaults on law-enforcement, is to identify the guilty parties and ensure they are arrested.

Such deterrence will prevent any future devolution from legal popular protests into thuggery. No constitutional republic can tolerate its iconic heart stormed, breached, and defiled.

Is Some Violence Worse than Others?

Of course, there is no such thing as “good” or “acceptable” violence of either Trump supporters or of the Antifa and BLM sort.

Yet the latter were largely exempt from any consequences for most of the summer—despite Joe Biden’s demagogic implication that the now multibillion-dollar funded BLM was treated harshly in comparison to the rogue Trump rioters.

Do we remember the authorities’ exemptions given to “warlord” Raz Simone and his armed thugs who, with absolute impunity, took over a Seattle “autonomous zone” known as CHOP or CHAZ, where four shootings and two deaths followed? Who exactly destroyed or vandalized thousands of state and federal public monuments—some in Washington, D.C.—and burned and looted hundreds of buildings with impunity?

Those who wrongly demanded to defund the police, now rightly deplore the lack of a Capitol police presence. Their only consistency is their own perceived political self-interest.

Biden himself rarely if ever, without exceptions, outright condemned the atrocious violence of Antifa and indeed contextualized it as an “idea”—a disincarnate entity that apparently could magically also burn and loot. 

Again, his inaugural call for unity was quickly superseded by his surreal accusations that the police were racist in not quelling the violence. Yet the problem at the Capitol was not that security was racially selective, but that there was not much security at all. And the lapse was probably not by design as much as sheer incompetence.

The president-elect’s demeanor and furor certainly were not compatible with his media image as the supposedly angelic uniter of the country. Within 24 hours he had gone from blasting the police authorities as racists to the old reductio ad Hitlerum trope of comparing a few Republican senators to Nazi propogandist Joseph Goebbels, in a hysterical rant that descended into incoherent numerology about the bombing of Dresden. I’m sure Xi Jinping and Ayatollah Khamenei were impressed by his historical recollections.

Would that summer candidate Biden had just once said a word on behalf of the victims of Antifa/BLM—over 700 injured law enforcement officers, billions of dollars in damage, and dozens killed over a summer of hateful violence that also wrecked the lives of thousands of struggling small business owners and their employees. What Kamala Harris said about the violent summer protests was appalling, and she was most worried about bailing out those arrested for street violence. Somehow a summer of hate and destruction earned BLM $10 billion in corporate gifting. Did anyone suggest that CEOs were subsidizing violence by crassly buying protection?

One might add that the D.C. police shooting of an unarmed white female military veteran fortunately did not precipitate the sort of unhinged looting and arson seen a few months ago. And so far, police authorities, to their credit, have had no hesitation in immediately releasing the names and photos of the suspect Capitol intruders. But then again, that was a deterrent modus operandi that also might have curbed Antifa and BLM violence earlier, had it been as well implemented widely against such miscreants.

In the 24 hours after the initial outrage of the unchecked violence in the Capitol, a weird cancel mob quickly formed. Democrats were demanding senators resign who voted against the legitimacy of the electors.

Lawyers who defended Trump were hounded and their firms leveraged to fire them. Book deals of suspect senators were cancelled. Resignations were the order of the day.

One would have never remembered that leftist protestors were once with impunity beating on the doors of the Supreme Court to get in during and after the Kavanaugh hearings, as others stormed into the halls of Congress and bullied senators. Still others this June lit up a church in their “largely peaceful” efforts to enter the White House grounds. Very few Democratic senators then called for calm and to take a step back.

Multimillionaire Michelle Obama, who seems seldom to allow a serious crisis to go to waste, was calling for the complete weaponization of social media and the permanent banning of Trump. A scared Mark Zuckerberg seemed to agree. The multibillionaire had infused $350 million of his private money into key preselected precincts to up voting turnout in a way the Left in the old days would have called the dark money that undermines democracy.

The Chinese Model

A day after Michelle Obama’s call, Trump coincidentally was indeed Twitter banned “for life” along with a number of conservatives, and “indefinitely” cancelled from Facebook. Trump followers fleeing to alternate social media sites discovered that their apps could be blocked by Apple and Google.

Amazon joined in blocking the servers of one of these, again coincidentally. The Left and a few terrified Republicans planned to impeach Trump even if out of office, sort of like those grotesque stories of those who hang, decapitate, or chop up the corpses of the dead.

The trillion-dollar social media monopolies, on cue from the Obamas and the Left, are now making the necessary adjustments for a hard left-wing, controlled presidency and Congress.

Soon in calmer times, antitrust lawyers will be suing Big Tech for its efforts to destroy its business rivals and ideological opponents as a textbook case of corporate market rigging. 

In the 19th century, “progressives” sought to curb the power of monopolies and trusts on the logic that the proverbial people had only the railroads or telegraphs to travel or communicate, and should be freed from their octopus “tentacles.” The railroad argument, “Ride a horse if you don’t like us” never washed.

Now progressives enlist social media monopolies to ensure that they alone can control, censor, and cancel incorrect communications over the publicly owned airspace. “Just email or use your cell phone, if you don’t like us” won’t wash either. Progressives are no longer the watchdogs breaking up trusts. They are the trusts breaking up watchdogs.

Soon we may see all alternate social media emasculated, those with conservative views deplatformed, and the United States becoming essentially a closed society. How can we resist China when we become China—the model of efficiency in the mind of many progressives, some of whom praise their control of the social media and their solar and wind energy authoritarianism.

2021 Worse than 2020?

As a day-late, dollar-short, now contrite Trump was belatedly calling for calm, and finally a peaceful transition and unity, the Wall Street Journal also belatedly wanted Trump to resign now and leave a few days early. Would he do a public perp walk out of the Oval Office, so that in “Game-of-Thrones” fashion the mob could throw trash and feces at him?

Some of Trump’s cabinet members apparently virtue gabbed to the media that they had considered removal of Trump by the 25th Amendment. Time will tell whether that was a wise career move or performance art, given incoming Joe Biden does not seem always alert.

Even a few White House appointees resigned early to illustrate to the nation their utter shock at the uncouthness of the president that they had gladly served for months or years. How odd that so many appointees willingly joined the Trump team who would never have been appointed again to much of anything before 2017, then enjoyed their tenure, and then when fired or resigned over their policy recommendations, suddenly lectured the nation, in their newfound moral superiority, for voting for a supposedly now evil Donald Trump.

There will be about another week of this ritually hating Trump through impeachment or removal, and then he will leave office quietly.

The Impending Revolution

Attention will turn to President Biden, and whether there will be an end to the Senate filibuster, the nine-justice Supreme Court, the Electoral College, and a 50-state union—and an entire remake of the United States as we knew it.

The Left will need this new monopoly on information as dissent grows. No wonder then, in a few hours of national panic, it took care of the family business as Michael Corleone once put it. After all, who could be bothered by a plague, stalled state vaccinations, a recession, and a country torn apart by an election that saw 100 million votes cast before election day?

The central question of Biden’s first months hinges on whether the media and his handlers can shield a President Biden from cross examination, as they did so well with candidate Biden. Wiser leftist heads no doubt squashed talk of 25th Amendment removal of Trump, given the fear of Biden “senior moments” in the months ahead and perhaps even someday a request for a Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test result.

Who knows, maybe even Yale psychiatrist Dr. Bandy X. Lee, on the invitation of Vice President Kamala Harris, can return for a cameo congressional appearance with more talk of “interventions” to remove a supposedly confused president.

In general, it is always a lousy idea to destroy the institutions that might protect one later in extremis. But the Left did just that in the Trump years.

So we will see in six months how smart it was in 2019 to impeach a first-term president over a phone call inquiring about Biden, Inc, or to fund a special counsel with a $40 million budget, politically warped FBI investigators, and a partisan legal dream team over a hoax—especially given in the next year the possible exposure of the ten-percent, likely untaxed take for the “big guy”.

As for Trump, there was a road, a far better road for him, not taken. He likely knew by the second week in December, when the electors were chosen, that his flurry of month-long lawsuits, recounts, and objections would not lead to either a new national election or the disqualification of votes in 4-5 key states. The kraken of Sidney Powell was already a crawdad, and the fantasies of Lin Wood were increasingly perverse.

So Trump erred in pressing his unrealistic claims of winning the election and thereby giving his supporters expectations that the irregularities in the voting would translate into a Trump second term. Again, fairly or not, legally or illegally, rightly or wrongly, that simply was never going to happen. To insist that it would was to mislead his most loyal base. And the disconnect from the finality of November 3, may have contributed to a Republican Senate lost in Georgia, and, for now, has clouded his legacy of real achievement.

Meanwhile for a few final days his enemies will still replay the now tired celebrity arguments of Winter 2017 about how best to remove the then newly inaugurated Trump (e.g., blowing him up, beheading, stabbing, incinerating, punching and shooting) as if just letting him ride off signals their own defeat. Kathy Griffin popped up retweeting the decapitated head of Donald Trump—apparently without worry of a Twitter ban.

But meanwhile, the country in 2021—worn out by riot, arson, looting, plague, lockdown, recession, and election fatigue— is facing a number of existential crises that will only accelerate in the months ahead.

The Trump haters must concede that his caricatured Operation Warp Speed gave the states millions of COVID-19 vaccinations in just 10 months. Yet many Trump hating governors for some reason can’t use their stocks to just vaccinate the people and save thousands of lives. How sad that the hated Trump did get vaccines within the promised year into the hands of the beloved governors, who conducted their own Operation Turtle when it came to vaccinating their own residents.

The national debt will soon exceed $28 trillion. No major political leader of either party offers any sort of blueprint on how to reach a balanced budget, much less an eventual reduction of the debt without sending the economy into recession or worse.

We are still in a recession. But we have already exhausted stimulatory medicine with de facto zero interest, a massive federal budget deficit and unsustainable national debt.

No doubt once the public is unlocked and unleashed, pent-up demand will spur some kind of a recovery. But whether the uptick is sustainable on a pile of borrowed money remains to be seen.

China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia see Trump’s increases in the defense budget, the once robust 2019 economy, and his deterrent unpredictability as ancient history. They too are taking care of business and clamping down on their own while the world watches the American meltdown.

They savor the likelihood of slashes in the Pentagon budget, a predictably accommodating 78-year-old and often confused commander-in-chief Biden, and a reset return to the 2016 world of the Iran Deal, unquestioned Chinese mercantilism, North Korea promiscuous missile testing, and Russian hacking and bullying of its neighbors.

Let us hope they are weaker than they boast and Biden is stronger than he seems. 

So February through April could be an iffy period. Biden likely will allow his own hatred of Trump to lead to a renunciation of what have been largely successful policies overseas.

Given Trump’s last two weeks, the Left will seek process, not just policy, changes, in a manner not seen since 1932 or 1964. It wants to “cleanse” those with whom it disagrees and destroy rather than defeat them. It is quickly consolidating the means of public communication and corporate culture, made easier by a COVID stricken, quarantined, and financially strapped population. For now there is nothing to stop them.

So hang on. It is going to be Mr. Toad’s wild scary ride for all of 2021.