Sunday, June 7, 2020

Former Cop Brandon Tatum Delivers INCREDIBLE Response To The Current Situation!

at

As a means to breaking down Western Culture



Antonio Gramsci:

“Socialism will triumph by first capturing the culture via infiltration of schools, universities, churches and the media by transforming the consciousness of society”

Gramsci, a Marxist theorist, was also a founding member of the Communist Party of Italy.
Gramsci embraced gradualism – a policy of gradual change as a means to his end.

He recognized that this process must be lengthy, methodical and persistent – or as he put it “a long march through the institutions”.

A slow transformation from within.

Gramsci’s ideas came to the United States not through his own person, but through the Frankfurt School.

The Frankfurt School employed a technique invented by Max Horkheimer called Critical Theory – a social theory oriented toward critiquing and changing society as a whole.
The point of Critical Theory is to criticize every traditional social institution – and to specifically avoid offering any alternatives – as a means to breaking down Western Culture.

A better, alternative way is never to be offered – only criticism.

Theodor Adorno, a leader at Frankfurt School, co-wrote The Authoritarian Personality, arguing that epitome of psychological health was the “genuine liberal” - free of all groups, including family & institutions – anyone who defended traditional culture was inherently a Fascist.

The Authoritarian Personality was an attack on Western Values at its most basic core – the family.

Adorno's premise. The traditional family model – mixed with religion in a capitalist society – created an individual who was prone to racial prejudice and ultimately fascism.

The goal of the Frankfurt School was to move America gradually to the Left using the precepts of Gramsci’s Counter Hegemony and the practice of Critical Theory.

Changing the Culture of America through Gramsci’s “long march through the institutions”.

Saul Alinsky was an American democratic socialist. He is considered to be the founder of modern community organization.

In 1946, Alinsky wrote Reveille for Radicals, a text on community organizing.

In 1971, he wrote his most famous work, Rules for Radicals.
One of Alinsky’s stated goals was “radicalization of the middle class”.

To this end Alinsky suggested that “goals must be phrased in general terms like Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, Of the Common Welfare, and Pursuit of Happiness.”
Alinsky also saw that organizers must cloak their causes in morality:

“Moral rationalization is indispensable to all kinds of action, whether to justify the selection or the use of ends or means…"

Alinsky believed in change as a tool, but like Marx and his Dialectic Process, Alinsky also believed change was THE goal.

Alinsky:

“The end is what you want, the means is how you get it”

“In the beginning the organizer’s first job is to create the issues or problems.”
In a 2008 Letter to the Boston Globe, David Alinsky – Saul’s son – noted the following:

“Obama’s training in Chicago by the great community organizers is showing its effectiveness…the method of my late father always works to get the message out."
Hillary Clinton has been referred to by David Brock as "Alinsky’s Daughter".

But I think the true heritage – the lineage of the Left – leads straight back to Antonio Gramsci.

at

London statue of Winston Churchill vandalized on D-Day amid protests

A statue of Britain's most renowned leader Winston Churchill has been vandalized in London as protesters turned out to speak against racism.
The vandalism came on the anniversary of D-Day when allied forces -- partially led by Churchill -- stormed the beaches of Normandy during World War II.
Footage online showed the bottom of the statue bearing neon green graffiti that read "ACAB," which stands for "all cops are b-------."
While it's unclear who the perpetrator was, many blamed the protesters and called out the police for not doing more to protect the statue. Police eventually surrounded the statue in an apparent attempt to protect it from further defacement in Parliament Square, where thousands of protesters had gathered, according to The Sun.

Others criticized the police for not preventing the incident. Conservative commentator Darren Grimes tweeted: "The statue of Sir Winston Churchill, the man who guided our nation through its darkest hour, recognized as one of the greatest ever Britons, has been defaced. Where are the police?"
Some, however, seemed to excuse the vandalism by describing Churchill as a racist.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/churchill-statue-vandalized-d-day-london
at

FBI Pledge Allegiance to Black Lives Matter, Antifa, Nation of Islam and New Black Panthers Protesters


In a display of public unity with ‘The Movement’ writ large, FBI officials took a knee to declare their woke allegiance with the protesting mobs.  With that visible display we now have a better understanding of the motives behind a history of FBI failures.


Setting aside the optic that some members of the FBI looking more like ‘meal-team-6’, there was always a suspicion the FBI were more concerned about political correctness than actually doing the work of a federal investigative agency.  Historically the FBI has failed miserably to stop domestic terror threats; and when the investigative failures are researched there’s usually a prior connection between the attackers and the FBI.

The father of the Orlando Pulse nightclub terrorist, Omar Mateen, was a guy named Seddique Mateen (you might remember seeing him at the Hillary Clinton rally).  After Omar killed 49 people it was discovered that Seddique had been an FBI informant for over eleven years (2005 to 2016).

Similarly, after the Parkland school shooting, it was discovered the FBI was fully aware of Nikolas Cruz, yet again they had taken no action.  The exact same scenario had played out several years earlier when the FBI was warned about the Tsarnaev brothers before the Boston Marathon Bombing 2013 and yet they did nothing to stop it.

The FBI is now a political agency with police powers within the federal government.  The activity of Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, James Comey, Andrew McCabe and a host of very familiar names has shown just how important politics is within the institution.  Indeed, as we saw in the ridiculous Hillary Clinton investigation, politics was the prism for every decision; and protecting their ideological tribe was the biggest concern within the agency.

Understanding the sensitivity behind the FBI to the Muslim community; a sensitivity almost identical to the expressed position of the democrat party apparatus; it should not come as a big surprise to see FBI agents ignoring terror threats and simultaneously taking a knee to show their allegiance with Black Lives Matter.


After all, Black Lives Matter (BLM) is an assembly of political grievance activists that includes the Nation of Islam (Farrakhan) and the New Black Panther Party (NBPP).  The overall network is currently working in coordination with the ultra-violent Antifa.

When the FBI takes a knee to support BLM they are openly aligning with Antifa and the violent advocacy it carries; and not being subtle about sticking a finger in the eye of the U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr.

Once we accept the FBI is a weaponized political agency it makes sense they would only target people adverse to their political agenda; and more harshly target anyone whom they would view as a political opponent (Roger Stone).  Somehow the FBI found the motivation and resources to send more heavily armed agents to arrest 68-year-old Roger Stone than ever stepped foot in Benghazi, Libya.

This also explains why the FBI refused to deal with FBI chief legal counsel Dana Boente when his corrupt activity was discovered within an attempt to overthrow President Trump.

Severe politicization also reconciles how Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann were able to instruct over 50 FBI agents to investigate a transparently non-existent Russian collusion conspiracy for over two years; as part of a strategy to help democrats win the 2018 election.

One example within the FBI operation in 2018 was the fraudulent nonsense behind Cesar Sayoc.   You might remember: FBI Director Christopher Wray outlined during his remarks the mysterious devices consisted of PVC pipe, clocks, batteries, wiring and “energetic material that can become combustible when subjected to heat or friction”.


Indeed, in hindsight things make a lot more sense when we see the FBI take a knee to express their politics publicly, and we have two years of FBI Director Christopher Wray explaining how the FBI is an earnest group of employees who just needed a little more “bias training” to ensure their bias did not surface in their investigations.

Understanding the political prism through which all decisions are made in the FBI, also helps reconcile why FBI Director Christopher Wray would choose David Bowditch as his deputy director.

David Bowditch was the FBI official in charge of the 2015 San Bernardino terrorist attack carried out by Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik.  14 people were killed and 22 others were seriously injured.  Everything behind the attack was sketchy, and there was clearly a green card scam being run as part of the background operation.

Yes Alice, once you accept that everything the FBI does is based on their politics, then everything starts to make a lot more sense; including how those suspects were able to carry out their operations while under surveillance.

From the recent Pensacola Naval Air Station attack, to the attack in Las Vegas, to the Garland Texas terrorist event everything makes sense from the perspective the FBI are first and foremost a political operation.

One other event also takes on a remarkable amount of clarity now (watch):





at

Denial of Truth Allows Easier Trespass


In order for devout leftist ideologues, and their allies in the media, to continue advancing their ideology they must pretend not to know things.  Denial of truth allows easier trespass.  Never is this more true than in the hoax behind “social distancing.”

We were told we could not bury our lost family members or have funerals or memorial services because the COVID-19 infection spread was based on proximity.

We were told that science and doctors were the experts who would guide the rules and regulations.  Those voices would shut down livelihoods; but we were guaranteed only the best science and health advice, not politics, was the reason.


It was all a lie.


Those same voices now say:

“As public health advocates, we do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission. We support them as vital to the national public health and to the threatened health specifically of Black people in the United States.” (link)

The manipulation of COVID-19, and all of the decisions within the weaponized fear of the virus, was entirely based on politics and ideology.  As soon as those health ideologues  needed to assemble large protest gatherings, they immediately dispatched the rules used against others.


We were told social distancing was required to prevent the spread of the virus; businesses needed to close; large gatherings had to be cancelled; sporting events totally shut down; concerts and movie theaters must remain cancelled and closed.

We were told it was necessary to stay locked-down and distant from your friends and family because the COVID-19 virus was dangerous and infections would escalate.

The decision today to advocate for and allow large protest gatherings proves all of that disinformation was a hoax.  It was not about the virus, it was indeed all about control.

This is an especially painful realization for those who could not hold funerals to bury their family members; however, it is also a wake-up call to everyone else to re-evaluate just how far the political left is willing to go in order to advance their ideology.

Today these voices pretend not to know what they have demanded for the past three months.

Today these voices pretend not to know the pain felt by people who were not permitted to grieve with their family or provide comfort for the afflicted.

Today these voices pretend not to know the economic hardship their scheme and hoax has brought down upon millions of Americans; ordinary good people who have seen their livelihoods destroyed at the altar of weaponized leftist ideology.

In hindsight the Tik-Toc dancing and gleeful celebrations within the medical community, while the hoax was being perpetrated, are a sickening reminder of those who would laugh in our faces while destroying our lives.

It was all a manipulative lie.





Let’s hope the vast majority of Americans will remember this in November….


at

Leftist/Jihadist Common Goal: 'This S--t Won’t Ever Stop Unless We F--kin’ Take It All Down'


Article by Robert Spencer in "PJMedia":

Urooj Rahman is a housing attorney for Bronx Legal Services who is currently in legal trouble for tossing a Molotov cocktail at a NYPD cruiser during the recent riots in New York City. She is also a committed activist for the Palestinian jihad, having published agitprop spreading false claims of Palestinian victimhood. Despite the hot water she is in now, however, she has a bright future as an ideological leader of both the Left and the Islamic jihad. In an interview before her attack, she enunciated the common goal of both movements: “This s–t won’t ever stop unless we f–kin’ take it all down.”

In both the interview and during her attack, Rahman kept a Palestinian keffiyeh close to her face. Her sartorial choice was not incidental. With her attempted torching of the police cruiser (her Molotov cocktail didn’t light), she brought Palestinian jihad tactics to the riots in the U.S. She also revealed the congruence between the ideology of the Left in America today and that of jihadists, not just the Palestinians, but all over the world.

Regarding Israel, the goal of the Palestinian jihad is and always has been to “f–kin’ take it all down.” That is the meaning of the increasingly common slogan “From the River to the Sea, Palestine Will Be Free.” If “Palestine” must be “free” from the Jordan River all the way to the Mediterranean Sea, the Palestinian cause is not about ending “occupation,” or stopping “settlements,” or anything that the establishment media tells us about it. It is, rather, about destroying Israel altogether, as The Palestinian Delusion documents in detail. Until that goal is attained, as Urooj Rahman elegantly put it, “This s–t won’t ever stop.”

The same thing can be said of the jihad all around the world. As The History of Jihad shows, for 1,400 years the goal of Islamic jihad activity has essentially been “This s–t won’t ever stop unless we f–kin’ take it all down.” While there were occasional periods in which jihad violence against non-Muslim states grew less active and virulent, these pauses were not occasioned by a general rejection in the Islamic world of the idea that jihad must be pursued, or by reform of Islamic doctrine. The doctrine always remained; the wherewithal to put it into practice ebbed and flowed.

Although non-Muslim scholars and analysts routinely insist that Islam is a religion of peace and jihad is a spiritual struggle, Islamic scholars have stated otherwise throughout the history of Islam. In his book War and Peace in the Law of Islam, Majid Khadduri, an Iraqi scholar of Islamic law of international renown, says this about jihad: “The state which is regarded as the instrument for universalizing a certain religion must perforce be an ever expanding state. The Islamic state, whose principal function was to put God’s law into practice, sought to establish Islam as the dominant reigning ideology over the entire world….The jihad was therefore employed as an instrument for both the universalization of religion and the establishment of an imperial world state.”

Or more succinctly and pungently: “This s–t won’t ever stop unless we f–kin’ take it all down.”

This is not a new idea. The twelfth-century Maliki jurist Ibn Rushd stated: “Muslim jurists agreed that the purpose of fighting with the People of the Book…is one of two things: it is either their conversion to Islam or the payment of jizyah.” Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee, assistant professor on the Faculty of Shari’ah and Law of the International Islamic University in Islamabad, states that Ibn Rushd “leaves no doubt that the primary goal of the Muslim community, in the eyes of its jurists, is to spread the word of Allah through jihad, and the option of poll-tax [jizya] is to be exercised only after subjugation” of non-Muslims.

Or here again, “This s–t won’t ever stop unless we f–kin’ take it all down.”

Meanwhile, the Left’s anti-Americanism, and determination to “f–kin’ take it all down,” has been on abundant display in the recent riots. In Urooj Rahman, this Leftist and jihadist aspiration is embodied in a single person.

When she was arrested, Rahman was wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with the slogan “THE STRUGGLE CONTINUES REGARDLESS.” The Arabic word for “struggle” is, of course, jihad.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2020/06/06/leftist-jihadist-common-goal-this-s-t-wont-ever-stop-unless-we-f-kin-take-it-all-down-n502503
at

Economic Rebound Antithetical To The Class Warfare Plan


Anger  Games

The media apoplexy over stunningly positive economic news is directly related to how much damage a positive economy does to the Antifa/BLM strategy to divide our nation through class warfare.  A thriving Main Street economy is antithetical to the objective.

A thriving Main Street means an expanding U.S. middle-class.  As the middle-class expands it becomes more difficult to organize outrage based on division.


Part of the reason why limo-liberal elites have been successful politicians through the years is the outcome of their economic policy inherently creates a wider gap between the haves and have-nots.  This divide allows politicians to control apportioning.

Exploiting the gap, essentially exploiting class warfare as a political strategy, is the fuel that drives identity politics. Ergo all progressive economic policies, the offshoring of jobs; the policies that support Wall Street and globalism etc; are designed to weaken the U.S. middle-class while making rich people more affluent, and poor people more dependent.

The ruling elites deny this fundamental truth, but the rust-belt did not create itself.  The erosion of the U.S. manufacturing base -and Main Street- was an outcome of policy. Republicans and Democrats participated in this process.  Democrats claim, falsely, to be champions of the middle-class; but their narrative is refuted by the actual results of their policy.  Both parties are deep in the pockets of Wall St multinationals.

Many people call for a third party in politics without realizing President Trump represents the first second party DC has seen in decades.  That’s why he is opposed by both wings of the same legislative bird.

Through dependency the political elites begin their role to decide who gets what part of their limited and controlled economic pie.  Economic intervention, supported by both wings, in the spending process is what has allowed political interests to retain control.
Main Street and the freedom within the free market is a problem for command and control economic systems.  Wall St global financial systems, controlled by a limited number of large institutional multinationals, are much easier to control.

Remember the catch phrase “too big to fail” in the banking system?  The DC ruling class said a small group of banks controlled too much wealth.  So they instituted ‘banking reform’.  The result was even fewer banks that were even bigger.  The outcome was the exact opposite of what they said was the purpose.  Their policy made the problem worse.

President Trump’s America First agenda is specifically a benefit to Main Street and the middle class.  In the banking sector treasury policy and targeted deregulation focused on creating more community banks and credit unions to benefit Main Street.  That’s exactly what happened. By focusing on Main Street, Trump and Mnuchin fixed what the uniparty congress did not. [Arguably, congress purposefully and willfully did not.]  Smaller, more nimble, banks are now positioned to assist small and medium Main Street businesses.

President Trump’s domestic and global political opposition recognize that his trade and economic policies have reversed much of their control.  There are trillions at stake, that’s the financial motive for the opposition.  However, a lack of control over the economic outcome; meaning President Trump creating more pies; means not only do they lose control over the money, they also lose control through diminished political power.

America-First is a program focused on Main Street and it expands the middle class.  That is why during President Trump’s first term the wealth gap actually started to narrow for the first time in decades.   The wage growth for line-level or blue collar workers was/is rising faster than the supervisory wages.  This is a uniquely trumpian effect from a return to economic policies that benefit Main Street USA workers.

More jobs means the value of labor to do those jobs increases.  This economic path is against the interests of coastal elites and the politicians they pay to retain the wealth gap.


It is much harder to create outrage over a wealth gap when the workforce is seeing increased wage growth. In that scenario, the voices who live on the fuel of class warfare are ignored.

All of the current U.S. antagonism is dependent on the class struggle.  If the police are defunded only the wealthy will have access to police.

The same process is true for healthcare, housing and a host of economic measures.  If a person can independently afford to access these sectors, those who construct the system of controlling, dividing and apportioning the benefits become irrelevant.

The media outrage over the positive economic data today is indicative of their concern the economy will quickly rebound; and that means diminished influence for the politicians the media are in position to support.

The current protest movement is reliant upon the class struggle as the primary narrative underpinning the need for protest leadership.  Abundance is against their interests.

When the economy was shut-down by the COVID virus, it was an unnatural economic event.  Everything inside the U.S. economy including: the number of workers; the growth in wage rates; the availability of jobs; the lack of inflation; the expansion of investment, was the strongest in our history.  However, when everything was stalled all of that positive architecture, the policy that created the outcome, did not go away.

U.S. economic conditions were being driven by internal economic activity that was no longer as dependent on global drivers.  When the underlying economic strength is domestic, it makes sense the economy can restart much faster because the activity is not dependent on outside global stimulus.  In essence, the USA can rebound much faster because we are NOT dependent on the restart of other global economies.  Again, another uniquely positive attribute that is enhanced by ‘America-First’ policies.

China, Obama, Pelosi and Schumer can, and did, attempt to throw a COVID wrench in the expanding U.S. economy.  However, they cannot undo the foundation President Trump had already established.  Those America-First policies will again work in our favor; and yes, when President Trump says he “can do it again” his confidence is based on that underlying foundation.

Trump may not articulate it, but he knows the U.S. economic independence he has already achieved through three years of advanced policy to benefit Main Street.  He knows the trade agreements, the cutting of regulation, the unleashing of energy development and the weight of tariffs on imports all mean the best place for investment is inside the U.S.A.

That fundamental structure did not change, and is not going to change.

A recent example – Remember the previously mentioned policy focus on deregulated community banks and credit unions to assist Main Street?  The success and efficiency of the Paycheck Protection Program for small and medium business was a direct result of that earlier policy.  Even in crisis the America-First foresight pays dividends.

The far left is hoping to curtail the strength of the economy; that’s why the blue state governors are fighting against reopening.  However, the organized protests of thousands of people gathering together have made their best COVID shutdown arguments moot.

The professional grievance operators have a very narrow window to achieve their objective, and that desperation is starting to show in how severe they are pushing to create division before the economy restarts. Every social justice protest movement has been activated and Antifa footsoldiers are attempting to sow chaos.

The next funeral for George Floyd is was held in North Carolina.  Then the grievance tour travels to Texas for a full day viewing on Monday, and final funeral on Tuesday.  With the COVID nonsense collapsing at the same time the currency of the race-card is exhausting, what are they going to do after that?

A classic Alinsky agitator, President Obama and his global allies have a goal to exploit the current economic conditions to once again push divisive class warfare.  However, the economic conditions are rebounding faster than he/they are able to exploit…

…There is a collective desperation showing amid their alliance.


at

Healing, Not Hatred



A video recap of President Trump’s earlier remarks 
on the tragic death of George Floyd.




at

Are States Going To Prosecute Their Rioters? It Depends


Article by Anders Hagstrom in "The Daily Caller":

Footage of violent riots and rampant looting is coming out of nearly every major city in the U.S., but states vary wildly in their efforts to prosecute those responsible for the unrest.

While local police have had no issues arresting those engaging in violence, some jurisdictions have declined to prosecute them. Others, however, such as Texas and Missouri, are taking a far more strict approach and partnering with the federal government to press charges.

Arguably the most relaxed reaction to rioters came out of St. Louis, Missouri, where local prosecutor Kim Gardner refused to charge nearly 40 people arrested for rioting.

“In a stunning development, our office has learned that every single one of the St. Louis looters and rioters arrested were released back onto the streets by local prosecutor Kim Gardner,” Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt tweeted Wednesday.


Eric Schmitt ✔ @Eric_Schmitt
In a stunning development, our office has learned that every single one of the St. Louis looters and rioters arrested were released back onto the streets by local prosecutor Kim Gardner. 

 https://twitter.com/i/status/1268195075953176576


 Gardner’s brazen move led Republican Missouri Gov. Mike Parson to announce a partnership with U.S. attorneys to prosecute the state’s rioters, most of whom were arrested in St. Louis.

“Those who seek to use these protests to destroy property and commit acts of violence, including those who come to Missouri from out of state, will be held accountable for their actions by federal and state authorities,” Schmitt said in a news release, according to Fox4. “Those acts of destruction and violence will not be tolerated.”

The partnership has already brought results in the state, with authorities pressing federal charges against two people this week. One man was charged with distributing information on explosives and other destructive devices. The second man was charged with intent to organize a riot.

Police in Chicago have arrested more than 1,500 protesters as well, but nearly 80% of them were charged with disorderly conduct, according to a local ABC affiliate. 


Of the 1,500, police only referred 235 to the prosecutors office for serious felony consideration, most of them gun cases. The office reportedly authorized 88% of the cases.

Some of the defendants have been tracked down thanks to social media. One case in Chicago arose from footage of a man dressed as the Joker movie character setting fire to a police vehicle. A tattoo on the man’s neck connected him to one South Side Chicago resident Timothy O’Donnell, 31. O’Donnell has now been charged with arson.

Prosecutors in California say footage of incidents will be the primary factor in whether rioters, looters and arsonists are ultimately charged and convicted for their crimes. The FBI has also issues a nationwide request for photos and videos that can lead to the arrest of rioters.

As it stands, there is no shortage of video evidence of crimes being committed all across the country, but it can take time for authorities to find the evidence on social media or news broadcasts and connect it to a local suspect.

“It’s going to be a while,” one California police officer told the San Diego Union-Tribune. “We are hopeful.”)

Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has taken a similar approach to Missouri, partnering with the federal district attorneys in his state to prosecute violent rioters, especially those who are coming from out of state.

“Texans must be able to exercise their First Amendment rights without fear of having agitators, including those coming from out-of-state, hijack their peaceful protest,” Abbott and the U.S. attorneys said in a joint statement. “Today’s announcement will ensure there are harsh consequences for those breaking the law and that they will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

The federal-state partnerships come as U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr has made it a federal priority to prosecute those who cross state lines to participate in protests.


Out-of-state protesters were responsible for inciting much of the violence and looting at the original demonstrations in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Other cities across the country have experienced similar trends.

President Donald Trump has pinned the blame on Antifa, an anarchist protest group that has been extremely active in inciting violence at the protests. Trump is currently seeking to declare the group a terrorist organization, though it is unclear how such a designation would affect a domestic group.

https://dailycaller.com/2020/06/06/states-prosecute-rioters-looters/

at

You gullible saps


“An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last.” – Winston Churchill


Patriot Retort

Yesterday I mentioned that the push to “Defund the Police” has been a part of the Black Lives Matter agenda for years.  It’s one of the reasons that I roll my eyes in disgust at all the gullible saps who embrace the #BlackLivesMatter hashtag as a way to signal their virtue and prove they are “allies.”

Yeah, you’re allies of an organization that wants to strip your community of law enforcement, you gullible saps.

This is why I refuse to bend a knee and why I have nothing but contempt for those suckered by the Black Lives Matter movement.

Just as Antifa is not the “anti-fascists” they claim to be, Black Lives Matter is not what it claims to be.

And all you gullible saps who grovel and scrape and beg for forgiveness for crimes you didn’t commit are aligning yourself with an organization that seeks to sow chaos and anarchy.

You are surrendering to a radical Left movement that hates you, the country, our free market economy, and an ordered, civil society.
Great work, guys!

Yesterday, after the feckless mayor of DC had “BLACK LIVES MATTER” painted on the street in front of the White House, the DC chapter of Black Lives Matter attacked her on Twitter saying, “This is performative and a distraction from her active counter organizing to our demands to decrease the police budget and invest in the community. Black Lives Matter means Defund the police.” (Emphasis mine)

You understand?

Black Lives Matter means defund the police.

You hear that you gullible saps with your Black Lives Matter Facebook profile pictures posting selfies of you kneeling with your fist in the air?

Yesterday on Twitter, after President Trump mentioned George Floyd in his press conference, the disgusting junior Senator from California tweeted out “@realDonaldTrump, keep George Floyd’s name out of your mouth until you can say Black Lives Matter.”

Now, let’s set aside the Jerry-Springeresque “keep his name out of your mouth” retort, or, for that matter Kamala believing she has the right to dictate when the President can and cannot say George Floyd’s name.

Instead, consider that this woman, who never met a black man she didn’t want to prosecute, is demanding a President who supports law enforcement utter the phrase “Black Lives Matter” when, as BLM admits, “Black Lives Matter means defund the police.”

Is Kamala Harris a gullible sap?

No, she’s just a pandering piece of crap desperate to be chosen as Joe Biden’s running mate.  And she thinks sucking up to Black Lives Matter will get her there.

The fact is, I’m glad President Trump doesn’t say “Black Lives Matter.”  It’s refreshing to have a leader who doesn’t kneel to an anarchist mob hell-bent on destroying the fabric of our society as a way to pander to black voters.

You know, like this guy does:



Or these these Democrat Senators do:



Black Lives Matter sounds innocuous and agreeable, doesn’t it?  I mean who doesn’t believe that black lives matter?  But in reality, it is a weaponized phrase used by an insidious and destructive movement.


Maybe the gullible saps reflexively bending a knee to this radical group that wants them defenseless and afraid should stop and think about what they’re supporting.

You know, it is possible to hold to the truth that the value of a life is not determined by skin color without bending a knee to a radical movement that wants to tear the country apart.

And if you’re afraid of what might happen to you if you don’t bend a knee, take that as a gigantic clue that this is not a peaceful and well-meaning movement.

As Jesse Kelly said the other day, “A movement that can bring every major American city to a halt and put every major corporation on its knees is not an oppressed movement. It’s the movement calling the shots.”

And a lot of the reason it is able to “call the shots” is because gullible saps are tripping all over themselves to bend a knee and surrender as a way to appease the mob.

But as Winston Churchill once said, “An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last.”

When a radical group holds an irrational hatred for you, nothing you do will ever convince them that you should be spared from their violence.

So who exactly are you gullible saps trying to convince?

My guess is, you’re trying to convince your fellow gullible saps who, like you, are too afraid to stand up to this kind of hate-fueled anarchy.

If Black Lives Matter gets what it wants, you won’t be spared.  Your community won’t be spared.  The country won’t be spared.

And no amount of “But I’m an ally! Look at my Black Lives Matter profile picture!” is going to change that.

at