Friday, March 13, 2020

Cleaning Your Hand Extension..

I now have obtained your attention. 

For those who have not considered this, go take care of it now. 

The Proper Way to Clean Your Phone

The AP has some tips, including what not to do

Pedestrian uses her phone while wearing a face mask in Herald Square, Thursday, March 12, 2020, in New York.   (AP Photo/John Minchillo)
(Newser) – You're washing your hands countless times a day to try to ward off the coronavirus. You should also wash that extension of your hand and breeding ground for germs—your phone, per the AP. Tests done by scientists show that the virus can live for two to three days on plastic and stainless steel. The CDC recommends cleaning all "high-touch" surfaces daily, including phones, keyboards, and tablet computers. But cleaning your phone improperly can damage it. You want to avoid getting moisture inside it or scratching the surface. Don't spray cleaners directly on the phone, don't dunk it in cleaning solutions, don't spray it with compressed-air devices used to clean keyboards, and avoid rubbing it with abrasive materials. Here is AP's how-to: 
  • Start by turning off the phone and unplugging all cables. Your phone shouldn't be charging as you clean.
  • You can use Clorox wipes or wipes with 70% alcohol to wipe down your phone. Apple, which has cautioned against using household cleaners on its phones, says to do that “gently.” AT&T has further recommended wringing out disinfectant wipes before using them on a phone.
  • You can also use soft cloths to clean the phone, like a microfiber cleaning cloth or the cloths used to clean your glasses. Google says you can dip the cloth in soap and water, as long as you're careful not to get moisture in the phone. AT&T says paper towels work, too. You can spray them with disinfectant. Again, don't spray the phone itself.

3 Signature Trump Policies That Preemptively Addressed The Coronavirus Crisis



The global pandemic that began in Wuhan is the top story in the world right now. Contagion, fear, and even panic abound. The story touches on several issues President Donald Trump has made a part of his personal platform, especially our reliance on foreign imports. Yet his reaction has been the opposite of what we would expect.

Should we panic? No, we should not. But there are reasonable steps we should take to help contain this outbreak, and more steps to avoid some of these problems in the future, and Trump would do well to promote them.

During the credit crisis of 2008-2009, Barack Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, cynically remarked, “You never let a serious crisis go to waste.” Trump should remember what brought him to the White House and remind people that our dependence on goods from the Third World has hamstrung our response to the crisis. Instead of proclaiming that the disease is no threat to us, he should tell people the truth: In a time of global health crisis, we’ve outsourced a huge chunk of our medical industry to the country where most of these diseases originate.

Made in China

We still don’t know what drugs will help people afflicted with the COVID-19 strain of Wuhan coronavirus, but whatever it is, it’s likely to be made in China. That’s because the drugs we use most frequently are made there.

Politico reported on this last year, before the Wuhan outbreak was widely known. The numbers it cites are staggering: In 2018, “China accounted for 95 percent of U.S. imports of ibuprofen, 91 percent of U.S. imports of hydrocortisone, 70 percent of U.S. imports of acetaminophen, 40 to 45 percent of U.S. imports of penicillin and 40 percent of U.S. imports of heparin, according to Commerce Department data. In all, 80 percent of the U.S. supply of antibiotics are made in China.”

Antibiotics won’t help with a virus — almost nothing will, directly — but anti-inflammatories such as ibuprofen and acetaminophen do relieve some of the symptoms. In a pandemic, will China allow drugs to be exported, or will it keep them for its own people? The answer is obvious. Federal officials moved recently to exempt imports of medical gowns, protective masks, and other health-care products from tariffs, but we should question why they are manufactured in China in the first place.

Even beyond supply issues, quality control is uncertain in countries that lack the rule of law. Again, according to the 2019 Politico article, “A single factory in China made the active pharmaceutical ingredient for a common blood pressure medicine, valsartan, that was found to contain a cancer-causing chemical that has been used to make liquid rocket fuel.”

These factories cut corners to save costs at the expense of quality, and they receive state subsidies to do so. Trump’s signature issue has been fighting unfair trade with unfree nations. Why drop the issue now when events are proving him right?

Close the Border

Trump also campaigned on controlling American borders. His 2020 opponents, meanwhile, have fallen over each other to proclaim that illegal entry into the United States will barely be a crime when they’re in charge, just a civil offense like jaywalking or parking illegally.

To its credit, the Trump administration moved quickly on this point, banning foreigners who had recently been to China from entering the United States in late January, and President Trump announcing March 11 a travel ban from most of Europe. Unfortunately, the Chinese government concealed the 2019 outbreak long enough that the contagion had already spread to the rest of the world.

A travel ban is a quarantine writ large, and sounds to most of us like an eminently reasonable policy — but not to Bernie Sanders, who said he would refuse to close the border even if it was shown to stop the spread of the virus. Border closures are something “we don’t want to do,” Sanders said Monday. “We have a president who has promulgated xenophobic, anti-immigrant sentiment from before he was elected.” Sanders may be willing to die to avoid sounding xenophobic, but most Americans are not.

Embrace Your Inner Germaphobe

Beyond trade issues, Trump’s reaction to the virus has sometimes been puzzling. In an effort to reassure people about the state of the economy, he risks downplaying the potential harm to a dangerous extent.

Trump was well known to be a germaphobe before he became president. In his 1997 book, “The Art of the Comeback,” Trump wrote, “One of the curses of American society is the simple act of shaking hands, and the more successful and famous one becomes the worse this terrible custom seems to get. I happen to be a clean hands freak. I feel much better after I thoroughly wash my hands, which I do as much as possible.”

Thoroughly washing one’s hands with soap and water is the top piece of advice medical experts at the CDC and around the world are offering people trying to avoid the Wuhan flu. It would be easy for Trump to promote this message. Not only is it actual good advice, but it is something he actually believes and has been saying for decades.

A president telling investors not to panic will never stop investors from panicking, if that is what they want to do. But a calm message about personal hygiene would help and might actually save some lives. The president should stop worrying about the markets, which he cannot control, and use his bully pulpit to convince his fellow Americans to touch each other less.

From border control and foreign goods to deadly germs, this is a crisis Trump is uniquely positioned to handle responsibly. Instead of downplaying the problem, he should admit the truth and talk calmly about the things we can do now and in the future to prevent dire results. It makes good sense, and it also happens to be good politics. Barack Obama would not waste the crisis, and neither should Trump.


Amid Ongoing Fight FISA Will Lapse – McConnell Hopes to Assemble Vote Next Week, But Trump May Veto



The House Rules Committee previously released the text of proposed changes to FISA (full pdf).  The “deal” is intended to reauthorize the FISA “business records provision”, the “roving wiretap” provision, the “lone wolf” provision, and the more controversial bulk metadata provisions [Call Detail Records (CDR)], all parts of the Patriot Act.  However, key Senators and President Trump say not enough being done to change it.


The current FISA authorities expire on March 15th; it looks like they will lapse as Mitch McConnell tries to regroup for a possible vote next week.  McConnell was forced to delay consideration past the expiration date after Senators Mike Lee (R), Rand Paul (R) and  Ron Wyden  (D) said they would object.

WASHINGTON DC – President Trump told Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) on Thursday that he does not support a House-passed surveillance bill— raising fresh questions about the fate of the legislation.
A spokesman for Lee confirmed the conversation and that the president told the Utah Republican that he does not support the House legislation. Officials speaking for the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Lee and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) have been working to kill the House bill, including urging Trump to veto it if it reaches his desk, over concerns that it does not go far enough to reform the court associated with the Freedom Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). (read more)

The House legislation, negotiated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Republican leader Kevin McCarthy, supports the requests of AG Bill Barr and would renew several provisions the FBI claims vital to fighting terrorism.

The House legislation updates the three expiring surveillance provisions, including one that permits the FBI to obtain secret court orders to collect “business records” on subjects in national security investigations. The main purpose of this section is researching Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) violations. Using the FISA process for anyone suspected of FARA violations is a bucket of deep state horse-poo. It’s essentially an excuse for surveillance of anyone in DC.

Another provision, known as the “roving wiretap” provision, permits surveillance on subjects even after they’ve changed phones. So long as the subjects are “foreign” that’s no big deal. However, if the account owner of the phone is an American…. well, you can see the problem. Again, more sketchy stuff from the DOJ.

The third provision “lone wolf” allows agents to monitor subjects who don’t have ties to international terrorism organizations. This is where any American can be suspected, accused, and with no oversight have secret surveillance authorized by the secret court. The surveillance is retroactive; meaning the warrant allows the DOJ/FBI to find evidence to support the application for the warrant.  Sketchy.

I find myself in alignment with Rand Paul who says the laws should be changed so that *ONLY* foreigners can be targeted by FISA, and for all investigative issues involving Americans the DOJ/FBI should be forced to go to a traditional Title-3 Court to ask for a search warrant or surveillance. This approach is a more reasonable assurance for Fourth Amendment protection.

(Via Associated Press) […] Republicans had been aggressively seeking changes to the law since the Justice Department’s investigation into Trump’s campaign and Russia, while many Democrats already had concerns about government surveillance.
At the behest of those Republicans, the House compromise takes aim at some of the missteps the Justice Department has acknowledged making during the Russia investigation. Applications under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to eavesdrop on a former Trump campaign aide were riddled with omissions and missteps, according to an inspector general report.
The measure would require that officers responsible for FISA applications certify that the department has been advised of any information that could undercut or contradict the premise of the surveillance. In the Russia investigation, some of the information the FBI omitted from its applications cut against the idea that former Trump adviser Carter Page was a Russian agent, the watchdog found.
Page has denied that and was never charged with wrongdoing.
The bill also would institute criminal penalties and other sanctions for making false statements to the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which issues warrants to the FBI to eavesdrop on people it has probable cause to believe are agents of a foreign power. It would require the attorney general to approve in writing of an investigation if the target of the surveillance is a federal candidate or official.
Attorney General William Barr was involved in the negotiations with the White House and Congress, and he said Wednesday that he supports the bill.
“It is of the utmost important that the Department’s attorneys and investigators always work in a manner consistent with the highest professional standards, and this overall package will help ensure the integrity of the FISA process and protect against future abuses going forward,” Barr said.
But Barr’s support does not guarantee that Trump is on board. The president kept Congress guessing with a Thursday tweet that did not indicate how he would act. (more)

.


FCC Commissioner Calls Out Adam Schiff Over His Secret Subpoenas, May Take Action



During the House impeachment proceedings, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) released a report which included the phone records that included calls made or received by Rep. Devin Nunes(R-CA), journalist John Solomon, Rudy Giuliani and others. The records in the report didn’t contain the content of the conversations but included who called who called who and how long the call lasted.

The belief was that the records were obtained through subpoena to the phone companies of records related to Giuliani and Lev Parnas, with the obvious purpose meant to try to impugn the people whose records were included without reason or cause.

What made it especially troubling was Schiff wouldn’t explain who was subpoenaed or how, and if it was a Congressional subpoena straight to the companies, it was a troubling abuse of power.

Now, as Kim Strassel at the Wall Street Journal is reporting, the FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr is calling Schiff out over what he believes are abuses of his subpoena power and Carr wants answers. Strassel called it an “incredible abuse” with Schiff publishing call records of his political rivals including Nunes, even the president’s attorney, Rudy Giuliani. Schiff even smeared Nunes during a press conference with the records, trying to suggest that Nunes was somehow “complicit.”

While Carr acknowledged that there might be instances in which Schiff could subpoena call records, Carr said the problem was that Schiff did this in secret, without giving the people whose records were grabbed the opportunity to respond or fight the request. 

If that’s allowed that a tremendous abuse of power if members of Congress can just demand phone records from the phone company about any American without any court and without any check. 
Carr sent Schiff’s House Intel Committee a formal letter not only calling out their prior actions, but indicating that Schiff/the Committee may still be getting people’s records.




Carr points out in his letter that Schiff isn’t allowed to get the records from the phone company without consent from the citizen or in accordance with the law, that there has to be judicial review. Nor did they establish any legitimate legislative purpose in subpoenaing the records. 

Moreover, as Carr notes, the recent decision involving the subpoena to former White House Counsel Don McGahn has now established that the subpoena power of the Congress as to such things might be questionable, without a court check on possible abuse of power.


Yes, please. It’s about time. Carr mentions substantial fines in his letter but their may be further action that could be taken.


Tom Cotton Launches New Ad Attacking Joe Biden On China In Ohio



Arkansas Republican Rep. Tom Cotton’s Political Action Committee (PAC), the Republican Majority Fund, is airing a new attack ad about Democratic presidential frontrunner Joe Biden in Ohio five days before the state’s primary on Tuesday.

The ad goes after the former vice president for being “weak on China,” where his scandal-ridden son, Hunter Biden, has conducted questionable business while Joe Biden voted to give the east Asian giant special trade status as a Delaware senator.

The ad begins by condemning China’s record on human rights and aggressive history of cyberwarfare.

“They run concentration camps. They forced the abortions of millions of babies. They brutally crack down on protesters. They hack America’s networks. They have stolen millions of our jobs,” a narrator says to dark images depicting Chinese abuses. “China is the greatest threat to our national security and our values. Career politician Joe Biden is weak on China.”


The new ad is part of a five-figure buy that will air in regions of the state hardest hit by manufacturing job losses. The ad will also play digitally in swing states across the country as part of Cotton’s effort to elect conservative veterans and aid in President Donald Trump’s re-election this fall.

“Throughout his career, almost every time he got the chance, Joe Biden took China’s side and American workers are still suffering for it,” Cotton told The Federalist. “Last year, Joe Biden claimed that China is ‘not competition for us’ and last month, he opposed President Trump’s travel ban on China as ‘xenophobic.’ Whatever the issue, Biden can be relied on to take China’s side.”

The attack ad targeting Biden on China in regions hollowed out by trade deals comes on the heels of Biden becoming the presumptive nominee after another series of major wins on Tuesday over his last standing rival in the race, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard remains in the race but has yet to capture a single state contest.

Biden’s wide victories in Mississippi, Idaho, Missouri, and Michigan have narrowed the path for Sanders to reach the 1,991 delegates required to clinch the nomination. Sanders’ loss in Michigan spells more trouble for the Vermont senator, who must prove he can capture critical Rust Belt states against Trump this fall.

Cotton’s Biden attack ad airing in Ohio might play to Sanders’s benefit in the state’s primaries next week as Sanders has targeted Biden on trade. It looks mathematically unlikely at this point that Sanders can overcome the delegate gap over Biden to win the nomination in Milwaukee. Biden currently leads Sanders with 838 delegates to Sanders’s 691.

If Not for the FBI’s PC Willful Ignorance...


If Not for the FBI's PC Willful Ignorance, at Least 70 People Wouldn't Have Been Killed

As if participating in the failed deep state coup against President Trump weren’t enough, the FBI has covered itself in glory once again. A new report released Wednesday documents how the feds missed opportunities to stop at least six lethal terror attacks on American soil. The report focuses on failures of “oversight” and “procedure,” but itself becomes part of the problem, in failing to note that the Bureau’s troubles go much deeper.

According to the Washington Times, those six attacks killed 70 people, and each of their perpetrators “had been on the FBI’s radar.” Nonetheless, “agents quickly closed the cases after concluding they were not national security threats, Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz said in the report.”

The attackers, according to the Times, included these jihad terrorists:
⦁ Omar Mateen, who killed 49 people at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, in 2016.
⦁ Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who killed three people at the Boston Marathon in 2013.
⦁ Nidal Hasan, who massacred 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009.
⦁ Esteban Santiago, who killed five people in a 2017 attack at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport.

Santiago was a convert to Islam who said that he committed his murders in the service of the Islamic State (ISIS).

Horowitz observed that “the FBI has acknowledged that various weaknesses related to its assessment process may have impacted its ability to fully investigate certain counterterrorism assessment subjects, who later committed terrorist acts in the United States.”

Of course it did, because the FBI is still institutionally committed to ignoring, downplaying, or denying the motivating ideology behind jihad terrorism. Failing to investigate suspected jihadis is all part of the same willful ignorance. The bureau doesn’t want to appear “Islamophobic” by scrutinizing these people too closely; such scrutiny would abet the impression that there is something about Islam that incites some believers to violence, and the feds have already ruled out that possibility.

The Horowitz report won’t lead to the fixing of the problem, either. It makes scant mention of Islam and jihad, and makes no attempt whatsoever either to identify or explain the importance of the motivating ideology behind jihad terror attacks. This problem goes back to the early years of the Obama administration, and is the result of Obama’s deliberately chosen policy. On October 19, 2011, Farhana Khera of Muslim Advocates wrote a letter to John Brennan, who was then the assistant to the president on national security for Homeland Security and Counter-Terrorism. The letter was signed not just by Khera, but by the leaders of virtually all the significant Islamic groups in the United States: 57 Muslim, Arab, and South Asian organizations, many with ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Muslim American Society (MAS), the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Islamic Relief USA; and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).

The letter denounced what it characterized as U.S. government agencies’ “use of biased, false and highly offensive training materials about Muslims and Islam,” as well as supposedly biased trainers (including me), and demanded that all such materials be removed, although the letter didn’t even attempt to prove that any of the objectionable material was actually inaccurate.

Brennan assured Khera that all her demands would be met. He detailed other specific actions being undertaken, including “collecting all training materials that contain cultural or religious content, including information related to Islam or Muslims.” In reality, this material wouldn’t just be “collected”; it would be purged of anything that Farhana Khera and others like her found offensivethat is, any honest discussion of how Islamic jihadists use Islamic teachings to justify violence. And so it has been in the FBI and other agencies ever since.

This is what has led to the failure of the intelligence community, and a great many of the procedural errors upon which the report does focus: agents in all too many cases simply didn’t know what to look for, or how to understand the significance of the information they did have. Unless and until this is corrected, these failures of oversight and procedure will continue, no matter what safeguards are put into place.

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 19 books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book is The Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.

Trump to Declare National Emergency to Speed Virus Response

 Image result for pictures of president trump
 Article by Jennifer Jacobs, Saleha Mohsin and Jenny Leonard in "Bloomberg News":

President Donald Trump plans to declare a national emergency on Friday over the coronavirus outbreak, invoking the Stafford Act to open the door to more federal aid for states and municipalities, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The president said he will hold a news conference at 3 p.m. in Washington. Trump spoke Friday with Emmanuel Macron, the French president tweeted, about the pandemic, and agreed to organize a video conference with world leaders on Monday to coordinate research efforts on a vaccine and treatments and work on how to respond to the economic fallout.

Trump is under increasing pressure to act as governors and mayors nationwide step up actions to mitigate the spread, closing schools and canceling public events. Declaring a national emergency would allow the government to marshal additional resources to combat the virus, and also marks a symbolic turning point for the president, who has repeatedly compared the coronavirus to the seasonal flu and insisted that his administration had the outbreak under control.

U.S. stocks struggled to hold onto gains on Friday. The S&P 500 rose less than 1% in mid-day trading after climbing 6% at the open, following stocks’ worst day since 1987. Treasury yields increased as the Federal Reserve said it was buying $37 billion of bonds across maturities

Senate Democrats have urged Trump to invoke the Stafford Act and other disaster declaration requests they say would free up more than $42 billion in funding for states available in the Disaster Relief Fund.

An emergency declaration would allow a state to request a 75% federal cost-share for expenses that include emergency workers, medical tests, medical supplies, vaccinations, security for medical facilities, and more, according to a letter Democrats sent the president earlier this week.

Only a few emergency declarations for public health threats have been made since the 1960s, and only two have targeted disease outbreaks, when President Bill Clinton in 2000 declared emergencies in New York and New Jersey in response to the West Nile Virus.

https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-declare-national-emergency-speed-151931686.html

Trudeau says government will warn against international travel and tighten border to stop spread of COVID-19


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the federal government will warn Canadians against international travel and is considering tightening the border to some international travellers.
During an interview with Radio-Canada's Montreal morning show on Friday, Trudeau said the government is not closing the door to any idea and is assessing the situation on a day-to-day basis.
Asked if the government will close the Canadian border, Trudeau said: "We are in the midst of looking at this."
"We're in the midst of evaluating day-to-day what to do," he said.
"As you've seen, there are recommendations not to travel outside of Canada. We're in the midst of co-ordinating with the Americans, obviously, on our borders, on our actions. We'll continue to evaluate what we can do and how we can keep Canadians in security and we won't close the door on any idea."

Trudeau is in self-isolation at home as his wife, Sophie, has tested positive for COVID-19.
Trudeau also said the government is looking at a set of common national guidelines to limit the spread of the coronavirus across the country.
On CBC Radio's The Current, Trudeau said the government will make a recommendation to Canadians not to travel internationally right now. An announcement on that will likely come later today, he said.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-covid-19-1.5496367

Coronavirus Is Officially...


Coronavirus Is Officially A Pandemic, 
But What Does That Mean?

After weeks of battling SARS-CoV-2, what does this new categorization actually mean? More importantly, how is it going to change your life?

World Health Organization (WHO) Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus officially declared coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 a pandemic on March 11. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated its Pandemic Preparedness Resources. But after weeks of battling SARS-CoV-2, what does this new categorization actually mean? More importantly, how is it going to change your life?

First, it is vital to understand what a pandemic is. A pandemic is defined as “the worldwide spread of a new disease.” While it can be argued that we knew the spread of coronavirus was global weeks ago, specifics about the geographic spread (not the deadliness) of the virus did not previously qualify it for pandemic status. Experts use the term pandemic when epidemics are advancing in multiple locations on multiple continents at the same time.

What also makes a pandemic classification different from other diseases and illnesses that we see all over the world, such as cancer or dementia, is that it’s infectious. That means it can be spread directly or indirectly from person to person. As of today, the COVID-19 viral disease has been noted in at least 114 countries, infecting more than 120,000 people and killing more than 4,000.

During the WHO’s Feb. 26 mission briefing, the coronavirus had not yet caused a sustained and intensive community transmission. Nor had there been large-scale casualties attributed to the virus above and beyond other viruses.

As Tedros pointed out in that morning’s briefing, the “WHO has already declared a public health emergency of international concern – our highest level of alarm. Using the word pandemic carelessly has no tangible benefit, but it does have significant risk in terms of amplifying unnecessary and unjustified fear and stigma, and paralyzing systems.” He said using the word pandemic at that time two weeks ago “may also signal that we can no longer contain the virus, which is not true. We are in a fight that can be won if we do the right things.”

However, on Wednesday morning Tedros noted that “in the past two weeks, the number of cases of COVID-19 outside China has increased 13-fold, and the number of affected countries has tripled.”

The last time the WHO declared a pandemic was in 2009, when the novel influenza A (H1N1) virus emerged. The virus was first detected in the United States, but quickly spread around the world. Like coronavirus today, when the (H1N1)pdm09 virus began to circulate, few people had any existing immunity.

What makes the H1N1 pandemic different from the coronavirus pandemic in the population response is that many people over the age of 60 were found to have antibodies against the H1N1 virus, but young people were highly susceptible. The opposite has been true with coronavirus SARS-Cov-2, to which older individuals have been the most susceptible.

But the lessons learned from H1N1 should not be forgotten, particularly because it coincided with season flu, and the flu vaccine offered little cross-protection. Further, by the time monovalent (H1N1)pdm09 vaccine was produced, it was not readily available until well after the peak of the outbreak, and a second wave had already taken its place. During that 2009-2010 period, an estimated 60.8 million cases were detected in the United States, resulting in more than 12,000 deaths.

What is the difference between an epidemic and a pandemic? There are many ways to describe the level of disease occurrence, and epidemiological terminology and classifications often get conflated in public dialogue. But there are well defined definitions and classifications for disease measurements.

What makes the classification system hard to understand, and difficult for the WHO and CDC to define, is that diseases change over time. They become more or less widespread, more or less deadly, and thus, the classifications are constantly in flux.

A nice synopsis of the difference on VeryWell Health explains:
  • Epidemic is a term that is often broadly used to describe any problem that has grown out of control. An epidemic is defined as “an outbreak of a disease that occurs over a wide geographic area and affects an exceptionally high proportion of the population.”

  • An epidemic is an event in which a disease is actively spreading. In contrast, the term pandemic relates to geographic spread and is used to describe a disease that affects a whole country or the entire world.

For more information on how the WHO tracks, defines, and determines what becomes a pandemic, the WHO has a public “Stages of A Flu Pandemic” list that can be used as a guide.
  • Phase 1: no viruses circulating among animals have been reported to cause infections in humans.
  • Phase 2: an animal influenza virus circulating among domesticated or wild animals is known to have caused infection in humans, and is therefore considered a potential pandemic threat.
  • Phase 3: an animal or human-animal influenza reassortant virus has caused sporadic cases or small clusters of disease in people, but has not resulted in human-to-human transmission sufficient to sustain community-level outbreaks. Limited human-to-human transmission may occur under some circumstances, for example, when there is close contact between an infected person and an unprotected caregiver. However, limited transmission under such restricted circumstances does not indicate that the virus has gained the level of transmissibility among humans necessary to cause a pandemic.
  • Phase 4: is characterized by verified human-to-human transmission of an animal or human-animal influenza reassortant virus able to cause “community-level outbreaks.” The ability to cause sustained disease outbreaks in a community marks a significant upwards shift in the risk for a pandemic. Any country that suspects or has verified such an event should urgently consult with WHO so that the situation can be jointly assessed and a decision made by the affected country if implementation of a rapid pandemic containment operation is warranted. Phase 4 indicates a significant increase in risk of a pandemic but does not necessarily mean that a pandemic is a forgone conclusion.
  • Phase 5: is characterized by human-to-human spread of the virus into at least two countries in one WHO region. While most countries will not be affected at this stage, the declaration of Phase 5 is a strong signal that a pandemic is imminent and that the time to finalize the organization, communication, and implementation of the planned mitigation measures is short.
  • Phase 6: the pandemic phase, is characterized by community level outbreaks in at least one other country in a different WHO region in addition to the criteria defined in Phase 5. Designation of this phase will indicate that a global pandemic is under way.

To learn more about pandemics, the current state of SARS-Cov-2 and COVIS-19, and track changes in real time, please see the following sites:
Nicole Fisher is a Senior Contributor at The Federalist, the founder and CEO of HHR Strategies, a health and human​ ​rights​ ​focused advising firm. She is also a senior policy advisor on Capitol Hill and expert on health ​reform, technology​ and brain health -​ specifically as they impact vulnerable populations.

Main Street Strong – U.S. Weekly Jobless Claims “Unexpectedly Drop”


The stock market is not the U.S. economy.  The stock market is an investment instrument.
Yes, the downstream consequences from coronavirus mitigation efforts means there is likely going to be temporary, very specific, fluxes within the Main Street economy.  Entertainment, hospitality and leisure are likely to see the strongest initial impacts. However, as noted by the release of weekly jobless claims the U.S. economy is very strong.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The number of Americans filing for unemployment benefits unexpectedly fell last week as employers continued to hold on to their workers.
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 4,000 to a seasonally adjusted 211,000 for the week ended March 7, the Labor Department said. Jobless claims are the most timely labor market indicator. They have declined for two straight weeks.
Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims rising to 218,000 in the latest week. (link)
The cancellations of large public gatherings, events and venues will have some impact on independently employed workers and ancillary businesses connected to them.  That’s the purpose of the extended and targeted administration effort for financial assistance in very specific sectors.   However, in the aggregate the Main Street economy is still very strong.
Numerous pundits fail to understand the difference between strong financials in the banking sector (Main St), and the downturn experienced in the stock market (Wall St).  Cue the audio visual demonstration:
The stock market is Wall Street, an investment instrument.  The banking sector has strong liquidity and is more connected to Main Street.  The banks are stable; this is not a financial crisis.   Consider this analogy:
You own a modest home with a $200k mortgage.   The home fits your needs; you maintain it; you take good care of your home as do your neighbors.  All is well.
Tomorrow you find out the city council approved a permit for a railroad to run behind your neighborhood.  The value of your home drops 25 percent on the news of the permit.
Nothing about the home has changed.  Everything is just as comfortable for you next week as it was in all preceding weeks.  Other than a pending rail line everything is the same.
A month later you find out the city withdrew the railroad permit because the railroad company changed their mind.  The value of your home returns to where it was before the news of the permit surfaced.   See how that happened?
Now replace the railroad permit with the coronavirus.
Keep yourself and those you love well maintained.
This too shall pass…

GO PLACIDLY amid the noise and the haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence. As far as possible, without surrender, be on good terms with all persons.
Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others, even to the dull and the ignorant; they too have their story.

Avoid loud and aggressive persons; they are vexatious to the spirit. If you compare yourself with others, you may become vain or bitter, for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself.

Enjoy your achievements as well as your plans. Keep interested in your own career, however humble; it is a real possession in the changing fortunes of time.

Exercise caution in your business affairs, for the world is full of trickery. But let this not blind you to what virtue there is; many persons strive for high ideals, and everywhere life is full of heroism.

Be yourself. Especially do not feign affection. Neither be cynical about love; for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment, it is as perennial as the grass.

Take kindly the counsel of the years, gracefully surrendering the things of youth.

Nurture strength of spirit to shield you in sudden misfortune. But do not distress yourself with dark imaginings. Many fears are born of fatigue and loneliness.

Beyond a wholesome discipline, be gentle with yourself. You are a child of the universe no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here.

And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should. 

Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be. And whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life, keep peace in your soul. With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world.
Be cheerful. Strive to be happy.

China hints at denying Americans life-saving coronavirus drugs

State-run media hints it could cut off US meds, plunge America into 'mighty sea of coronavirus'

 Article by Barnini Chakraborty in "Fox News":

 
Now that the number of new people infected with the coronavirus in China is slowing down, the country's Communist Party is ratcheting up threats against the West, with a particularly nasty warning about access to life-saving drugs aimed at the United States.

In an article in Xinhua, the state-run media agency that's largely considered the mouthpiece of the party, Beijing bragged about its handling of COVID-19, a virus that originated in the city of Wuhan and has spread quickly around the world, killing nearly 5,000 people and infecting thousands more. The article also claimed that China could impose pharmaceutical export controls which would plunge America into "the mighty sea of coronavirus."

The disturbing threats made during a global pandemic as well as the scary consequences if that threat becomes real highlight just how tight China's grip is on the global supply chain. Already, the Food and Drug Administration has announced the first drug shortage related to the coronavirus. Though it did not disclose which drug was in short supply, the FDA did say it could not access enough raw components needed because they are made in China.

That doesn't come as a surprise to Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla, who told Fox News on Thursday that America is "dangerously reliant" on China for the production of critical goods, including parts for technologies needed to fight COVID-19.

Though the United States is a global leader in research, much of the manufacturing of life-saving drugs has moved overseas. The last American manufacturing plant to make a key component in penicillin shuttered in 2004. Since then, Chinese pharmaceuticals companies have moved in and taken over, supplying between 80 percent and 90 percent of U.S. antibiotics, 70 percent of acetaminophen and about 40 percent of heparin, according to Yanzhong Huang, a senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations.

If China makes good on its threat to cut off the United States, Rubio believes the results could be crippling.

The number of confirmed coronavirus cases worldwide on Thursday went up to 124,518, up from 118,162 cases the day before. In China, there are 80,980 confirmed cases. Italy saw a 22.7 percent jump to 12,462 from 10,149. Iran is hovering close to a 12 percent increase while cases in Qatar jumped 991 percent to 262 cases from 24. In the United States, there are more than 1,300 confirmed cases spread across 44 states and the District of Columbia.

As the rest of the world scrambles to contain the virus and protect its citizens, China has been busy casting itself in the role of global hero going so far as to demand a thank you for containing the virus as long as it did.

"We should say righteously that the U.S. owes China an apology, the world owes China a thank you," an editorial in Xinhua read.

Rubio said Beijing's comments should concern all Americans and that China is keenly aware that in a moment of crisis "they can threaten to cut us off from our pharmaceutical supplies, they could trigger a domestic problem here that would make it difficult or us to confront them."

"It's a tremendous amount of leverage," Rubio said.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/chinese-deny-americans-coronavirus-drugs