Saturday, February 15, 2020

Clowns: Times Square Billboard...


Clowns: Times Square Billboard 
Mocks the 'Circus' 
the Democratic Party Has Become

"Do you really trust these clowns?" So asks a new billboard going up on New York City's Times Square this weekend. The video broadcast on the billboard was exclusively provided to PJ Media. The video ad mocks leaders in the Democratic Party by putting their heads on the bodies of clowns at a circus.

The "DC Clowns" circus show features "Crazy Joe Biden," "Bernie Socialist Sanders," "Nervous Nancy Pelosi," "Shifty Adam Schiff," "Wacky Elizabeth Warren," "Lil Jerry Nadler," and "Clueless Chuck Schumer."

The Committee to Defend the President, a super PAC supporting President Donald Trump, launched the ad as part of a $40,000 ad buy.

"From the Democrats making fools of themselves on the campaign trail to those who foolishly sought to impeach President Trump, the Democratic Party is now a circus of epic proportions," PAC Chairman Ted Harvey told PJ Media. "The Committee to Defend the President will continue to expose their foolishness and support President Trump, as he prepares to serve Americans for a second term."

While it may seem undignified to mock the Democrats in this fashion, many of the figures in this ad have indeed beclowned themselves many times over.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, for instance, rushed the impeachment of President Donald Trump, insisting that the House of Representatives had no time to defend its subpoenas against the president's executive privilege in court. This led the House to add a second impeachment article — "obstruction of Congress." Law professor Jonathan Turley famously calledimpeaching the president on these grounds an "abuse of power." Yet weeks later when the House had passed the articles of impeachment, the very same Nancy Pelosi refused to send them over to the Senate, delaying the very process she insisted must be rushed to prevent Trump from threatening the 2020 election.

In a similar vein, House impeachment managers Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) argued that Trump's executive privilege was an impeachable offense — when they had vociferously defendedformer President Barack Obama's executive privilege after Attorney General Eric Holder was held in contempt of Congress for refusing documents in the "Fast & Furious" scandal.

Joe Biden has beclowned himself over and over and over on the campaign trail, from his infamous Silver Star story fabrication to his calling a New Hampshire voter a "lying dog-faced pony soldier." He began the New Hampshire Democratic debate last Friday by conceding he would likely lose, and then he shamefully skipped town on the night of the primary, leaving his campaign staff and volunteers in the lurch as he rushed down to South Carolina. I'm not sure "crazy" is a sufficiently offensive moniker.

As for Elizabeth Warren, it is certainly both "wacky" and clownish to present yourself as Native American for years, even getting touted by Harvard and published in a Cherokee cookbook, and then to insist you never received "any benefit" from the ruse whatsoever. Warren's pie-in-the-sky "plans" for government takeovers of whole industries also received much-deserved derision last year.

Bernie Sanders may be the greatest clown of all. He's more eloquent than Joe Biden and far more authentic than Elizabeth Warren, but his victory would represent the Soviets finally winning the Cold War against the U.S. While he firmly rejects the label now, he once didn't mind being called a communist. He infamously honeymooned in the Soviet Union in the 1980s and worked with various Marxist political parties during his time as mayor of Burlington, Vermont. He endorsed Socialist Workers Party candidates for president in the 1980s when that party was pointing to Soviet-aligned countries like Nicaragua and Cuba as inspirations for U.S. policy. His support for this party prompted an FBI investigation.

Democrats are terrified of having Bernie at the top of the ticket, but a Sanders nomination would be a fitting capstone for the Democratic Party's increasing clownishness.

While Americans should be terrified of this party, Jack Dunphy pointedout that it's healthy to have a laugh at some of the absurdity.




Media Will Never Understand The Country So Long As They Keep Hating Trump Voters



The mainstream media will spend a lot of effort this year reporting on Trump voters, but very little effort trying to understand or empathize with them.

I’ve spent much of the past two weeks in Iowa and New Hampshire covering the Democratic presidential nominating contests—hours upon hours of talking with Democratic voters, meeting with volunteers and activists, going to campaign rallies and field offices, and generally immersing myself in the chaos and consternation of the Democratic primary.

Because I work for a right-of-center publication, that means talking to people all day long who fundamentally disagree with me about politics, and often much else. In some cases, I know that my views are repugnant to the person I’m talking to, and that if they knew what I thought they would openly despise me, maybe call me a bigot. Maybe worse.

But because my job is to report on the Democratic primary, the onus is on me to be generous and empathetic with Democratic voters. I want to know what they think, and why, and it doesn’t matter whether I agree with them. It actually doesn’t matter what I think at all, even if I find some of their views repugnant. That means I have to defer to them, I have to be respectful, I have to be patient.

The thing is, once you begin doing this, even for a little while, you find it’s easy. If you really listen and take people at their word, it’s not that hard to see where they’re coming from, how their experiences and circumstances inform their politics and worldview. Before long, being generous and empathetic toward them comes naturally, even if you still disagree with their politics.

I’ve been thinking about this, and about many conversations I had with people in Iowa and New Hampshire, in the face of a mainstream political press whose core ethos seems to be a seething contempt for the tens of millions of Americans who support Trump. The establishment media have no desire, and put forth no effort, to understand people with whom they disagree, and are therefore incapable of the generosity and empathy that good reporting requires.

Media Hate Trump Voters, and Don’t Even Try to Hide It

This isn’t the only reason so many Americans distrust the media, but it’s a big one. Trump supporters know exactly what the media think of them, in part because the media are constantly proclaiming it.

Consider an article that ran this week in Vox about Trump’s Monday night rally in Manchester, New Hampshire. At one point the crowd, responding to Trump’s complaint about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi mumbling behind his back during his State of the Union address, began chanting “Lock her up!” as they did for Hillary Clinton in 2016.

For anyone who’s ever been to a Trump rally, chants like this aren’t something to take all that seriously. I’ve been to more than a dozen Trump rallies, and from what I can tell most people are there for a good time, which accounts for the generally joyous and positive atmosphere at these things. Trump’s rambling monologues and inevitable jabs at the press pen, like the chants, are all part of the harmless fun—politics as a WWE spectacle rather than an actual blood sport.

Not for Vox’s Aaron Rupar: “The moment was a cruel reminder that even if Clinton has temporarily faded out of view, Trump and his fans seem to enjoy the pipe dream of imprisoning progressive women — in this case, for the imaginary crime of speaking quietly.”

Imagine the hostility and disdain you must have for Trump supporters to conclude from what amounts to a joke at a rally that Trump supporters literally want to imprison leftist women. It’s beyond parody.

So was a recent CNN segment featuring former GOP strategist Rick Wilson and someone named Wajahat Ali breaking into bad southern accents and mocking the president’s “credulous Boomer rube demo” while host Don Lemon keeled over in a fit of unrestrained giggling.

“Donald Trump’s the smart one, and y’all elitists are dumb!” drawled Wilson. Ali, not wanting to be left out, chimed in with, “You elitists with your geography and your maps and your spelling!”

It was the perfect example of what James Carville touched on in a recent interview with Vox, a follow-up to his rant on MSNBC about how Democrats need to wake up and stop talking about things that alienate most voters. Carville cited a series of tweets by New York Times columnist Benyamin Appelbaum, who criticized LSU for canceling classes for the National Championship and then said, do the “Warren/Sanders ‘free public college’ proposals include LSU, or would it only apply to actual schools?”

To this, Carville replied:
You know how f-cking patronizing that is to people in the South or in the middle of the country? First, LSU has an unusually high graduation rate, but that’s not the point. It’s the g-dd-mn smugness. This is from a guy who lives in New York and serves on the Times editorial board and there’s not a single person he knows that doesn’t pat him on the back for that kind of tweet. He’s so f-cking smart.

Appelbaum doesn’t speak for the Democratic Party, but he does represent the urbanist mindset. We can’t win the Senate by looking down at people. The Democratic Party has to drive a narrative that doesn’t give off vapors that we’re smarter than everyone or culturally arrogant.

Carville’s right that Appelbaum doesn’t speak for the Democratic Party, but he does speak for the mainstream media.

As we move further into the 2020 cycle, you’re going to see a lot more of this sneering contempt for Trump voters from the media, especially for voters in rural and exurban areas. When you do, know that of all the reporters and pundits traveling the country to cover the election, very few are doing the relatively easy work of trying to understand and empathize with the people they’re writing about.

The media wasn’t interested in why so many people were drawn to Trump four years ago, and despite all that’s happened since then, they still aren’t interested. That’s why so much of the political reporting you’ll see this year will be flat and colorless, lacking any real insight or nuance, and dripping with a condescension bordering on hatred.

Sources Tell Hannity: Those who engaged in ‘premeditated fraud on FISA…They’re about to see their worlds rocked”

 Sources Tell Hannity: Those who engaged in 'premeditated fraud on FISA...They're about to see their worlds rocked"
Article by Elizabeth Vaughn in "RedState":

Friday’s announcement that the DOJ will not charge former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe for lying to investigators on four occasions, three times under oath, left many of us in a state of shock, especially as the four prosecutors’ handling the Roger Stone case insist he deserves a seven to nine year prison sentence. When one compares the FBI and the Mueller team’s harsh treatment of General Flynn, George Papadopoulos and others to the passes given to the likes of McCabe, Hillary Clinton and James, it’s become clear that America operates under a two-tiered system of justice. It’s hard to conclude otherwise.

Republicans were provoked further after McCabe appeared on CNN and said, “As glad as I am that the DOJ decided to do the right thing today, it is an absolute disgrace that they took two years and put my family through this experience for two years before they finally drew the obvious conclusion.”

Conservative cable hosts and their guests on Friday night found McCabe’s exoneration inexplicable and left many wondering if those who plotted against candidate and then President Donald Trump will ever see justice.

Sean Hannity offered some hope to those of us who have lowered our expectations. His sources are telling him, “It’s real. Those that did the premeditated fraud on FISA, they’re about to see their worlds rocked.

Investigative journalist Sara Carter, a guest on the panel, chimed in to say, “That’s what I’m hearing too.”

Excerpts from Hannity’s remarks:
Apparently, if you’re a Trump-hating bureaucrat, you can perjure yourself or lie to the FBI with zero consequences.
Or can you?
If Comey or Hillary Clinton or Quid Pro Joe or any prominent Democrat or deep state official, seems [inaudible], it’s about to change, I think.
But breaking tonight, this could all be changing very soon. We are now beginning to see something very large unfold…McCabe dismissal, it’s a declination to prosecute on one specific issue…
I’m reading the tea leaves and my sources are confirming…that the Attorney General, Bill Barr, is now focused on something much bigger, much deeper, that could have far deeper, far ranging ramifications, serious ramifications. Because, as we speak, the Durham/Barr criminal probe is underway. I’ve been told by my sources it has gone deep, it has gone wide, it has gone far and that the evidence they are accumulating is overwhelming and incontrovertible.
According to reports, this investigation is scrutinizing the actions of Brennan…(puts up photos of Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein, Yates and Dana Boente, the former acting assistant attorney general for the National Security Division of the DOJ).
Durham has spent weeks in Italy and Great Britain. That would indicate to me the outsourcing of and intelligence gathering and spying on Americans to circumvent American law is in play. I am told that this evidence that we already have is about premeditated fraud on a FISA court. Nobody else in the media got that story right. We got it right on this program. The evidence is proven. It’s a slam dunk…Barr has already confirmed that the FISA applications were fraudulent…and that spying happened…
I believe tonight…that the Durham/Barr probe will deal a devastating blow to the deep state…I am cautiously optimistic that real justice will be done and the decks are being cleared…Looks like a five-alarm fire over at the Justice Department and we should know in short order…well, you know, meaning a few months.
  

(Listen to Hannity’s full remarks in the video below.)  

https://youtu.be/xk8GzmeQwLo

  Former acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker appeared on the show and said:

I see what you see. I was there when some of this was happening. I take a little more of the belief that Bill Barr is going to bring people to justice. And I think that those that did this, those that intentionally lied to the FISA Court, using the dossier as the sole basis for obtaining what the Court says were warrants that would not have been issued but for the fact of these made-up facts. I think we will see people brought to justice, and I think Bill Barr and John Durham are working on that as we speak and I think that we should have a lot of faith in them.

Hannity then described Hillary’s actions and asked Whitaker if he would have been exonerated had he done the same thing. Whitaker replied, “That is de facto obstruction. If you had done something wrong, like, say, hidden documents that are classified on a home brew server.”

He reminded Hannity that, following Comey’s exoneration of Hillary, he had written an op-ed in USA Today. I said, “I’m a reasonable prosecutor. I wouldn’t have let her off the hook. I think this is a case that needed to be brought.”

It’s easy to forget that John Durham is even conducting an investigation. He and his team are professionals. Unlike the Mueller team or Adam Schiff’s impeachment panel, they don’t leak.

So, while it feels as if no progress is being made, we know that Durham has expanded his investigation twice and that it shifted into a criminal probe in October, shortly after he and Barr returned from two trips to Rome and London. We also learned in December that Durham had requested all of former CIA Director John Brennan’s communications from his time there. That leak more likely came from the CIA than from Durham’s investigators.

And, last week, The New York Times published an article which told us what we’d already learned in December. My colleague, Nick Arama posted on this story here. The Times reported:

Trump administration officials investigating the government’s response to Russia’s election interference in 2016 appear to be hunting for a basis to accuse Obama-era intelligence officials of hiding evidence or manipulating analysis about Moscow’s covert operation, according to people familiar with aspects of the inquiry.
Mr. Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result — and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal, the people said.

We can be sure that whatever new information was included in this article has been gleaned from leaks of the “resistance” and has been deliberately spun to promote their narrative.

As frustrating as it is, we just have to wait a few months longer for some answers. As Whitaker says, have a little faith in Bill Barr and John Durham.

https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2020/02/15/its-official-america-has-a-two-tiered-system-of-justice/ 

U.S. State Dept. will evacuate American citizens...

BREAKING
Fear and Boredom Aboard the Quarantined Coronavirus Cruise Ship
U.S. State Department to evacuate Americans and their families aboard the Diamond Princess
About 380 people will be offered seats on two evacuation flights from Japan back to the U.S. - CDC official
Some may quarantine at Travis Air Force Base in California, while others may be transferred to Lackland Air Force Base in Texas
TOKYO—The pools, hot tubs and bars of the Diamond Princess emptied out on Feb. 5, when authorities quarantined the luxury cruise ship at a Yokohama dock. Instead of overflowing buffets, staff in surgical masks deliver boxed meals and snacks, about 11,000 a day.
Life has taken a turn for the nearly 3,500 passengers and crew aboard the $500 million vessel who entered a second week under quarantine for the coronavirus disease.
“I can’t wrap my head around the fact that I could die from this cruise,” said Gay Courter, a 75-year-old American novelist confined to a cabin with her husband. “I go look outside and there’s people in white hazmat suits.”
The only trips ashore are for those infected with the coronavirus, 218 so far, or people with other serious ailments. Of the disembarked passengers sick with the virus, eight are in serious condition, authorities said. Outside of China, the biggest outbreak is on the Diamond Princess.
The nearly 2,400 passengers who remain are largely trapped in their cabins. Health workers in masks and body suits knock on doors to ask selected passengers, including the elderly, to open wide for a throat swab. Used bedsheets and towels go into bags for incineration.
Anxiety and boredom appear the most common symptoms aboard what amounts to a floating petri dish. Aun Na Tan, of Melbourne, Australia, her husband, a 19-year-old son, and a daughter, 16, are stuck in a windowless cabin with two bunk beds. While the teens practice handstands, Ms. Tan said, “my husband is trying to learn.”
Shipboard entertainers have been assigned to record trivia quiz shows and origami-making for passengers to join along on cabin TVs. The magician recorded a performance, and a room steward demonstrated how to make a bed.
Coralie Williamson, 57, and her husband, Paul Williamson, 62, from Queensland, Australia, take turns reading from a book they brought, “The Resilience Project: Finding Happiness Through Gratitude, Empathy and Mindfulness.”
The couple had booked passage with a last-minute deal: A 250-square-foot cabin with a balcony was marked down to about $1,240 for the 15-day cruise that started in Yokohama, traveled south toward Vietnam and returned.
Their shared book, by Hugh van Cuylenburg, a former volunteer teacher in India, recounts the optimistic attitude among his underprivileged students. “It is helping us stay positive and express gratitude,” Mrs. Williamson said.
Ellis Vincent, a 76-year-old retired airline executive from Sydney, Australia, said he has spent more time than customary conversing with his wife while cooped up inside. She has an excellent memory, he said: “She is able to bring up every transgression I’ve ever had. I believe she is not finished.”
The operator of Diamond Princess, Princess Cruises, told passengers they would be refunded for the trip. Jan Swartz, the president of Princess Cruises, said last week the company was working closely with health authorities.
The shipboard contagion offers an opportunity to study the virus, said Michael Ryan, executive director of the World Health Organization’s Health Emergencies Program. He also acknowledged Thursday that “it’s a difficult thing for anybody to live in a closed environment like that.”
Japanese authorities on Friday arranged for 11 passengers to leave the ship and stay in government housing until the scheduled end of the ship’s two-week quarantine on Feb. 19. The passengers allowed to disembark were 80 and older and had met other conditions, including testing negative for the virus.
The total of laboratory-confirmed cases of the coronavirus, named Covid-19, reached 64,437 in China and 24 other countries. There have been 1,384 deaths, all but three in China. The U.S. confirmed its 15th case on Thursday.
Anxiety on the Diamond Princess over who will be next also infects the ship’s crew. Some were diagnosed with the virus and taken to hospitals. Those working received thermometers and were instructed to remain in their room if they had a fever. They were also given hand sanitizer, masks and gloves.
One waitress who had been delivering box meals sought help after she got a cough. “I realized it’s better to test for the virus,” the woman said. She tested positive and was taken to a hospital this week.
A waiter from Mumbai who worked with the woman was worried. “I feel like slowly the whole ship will be testing positive,” he said.
SET SAIL
When the Diamond Princess set off from Yokohama on Jan. 20, there weren’t widespread worries about the virus. In Wuhan, the Chinese provincial capital at the center of the outbreak, people went about their workaday lives.
Passengers aboard the 116,000-ton ship, operated by Princess Cruises, expected nothing less than a pleasant East Asia trip, including stops in Hong Kong and the isles of Vietnam’s Ha Long Bay.
A day before embarking, an 80-year-old man from Hong Kong developed a cough. He had crossed into mainland China’s Guangdong province 10 days earlier. Hong Kong health officials said he boarded the ship with two daughters and visited the ship’s sauna and restaurants.
The news gave passengers their first inkling of how serious a turn the virus had taken. The Hong Kong man, whose name hasn’t been released by authorities, left the ship early and, five days later, he went to the hospital.
During a shore excursion, a stranger at a Hong Kong subway station stopped Mrs. Williamson and suggested she wear a medical mask. “It got me worried,” she said. Mrs. Williamson and her husband looked but couldn’t find any in nearby stores.
Cruise passengers walked onto a disinfectant mat, then went through a thermal-imaging camera to detect higher-than-normal temperatures. People suspected of having a fever were pulled aside and asked if they had recently been to China. The new inspection procedure caused hours of delay.
The mood among passengers soon turned from impatience to worry. “People started hearing that an older person had disembarked and had tested positive,” said Rebecca Frasure, 35, from Forest Grove, Ore. “People started to think, ‘Wow, this is a big deal.’ ”
Mr. Vincent, the retired airline executive, had hoped to visit the site of the World War II Battle of Okinawa. He and his wife, he said, “ended up going to the quarantine hall and turning right around and getting back on the ship.”
Late that day, Hong Kong’s health authority announced that the 80-year-old Hong Kong man who left the cruise early had the coronavirus disease.
Japanese officials said a formal notification didn’t arrive until the next day, Feb. 2. If it had come earlier, the Diamond Princess might have been refused entry to Japan, said Kenichi Hoshino, a health ministry official. Another cruise ship, the Westerdam, headed for Japan later that week was denied access and stayed at sea until receiving permission to dock Thursday in Cambodia.
From Okinawa, the Diamond Princess, with 2,666 passengers and 1,045 crew, headed for Yokohama and another immigration inspection. Ship passengers said they didn’t get any special precautions on the last leg of the trip.
OPEN BAR
Diamond Princess revelers crowded the captain’s farewell cocktail hour after sunset on Feb. 2. They drank free beer and wine in the ship’s atrium, which rose three decks. Guests filled seats in the Princess Theater for a production of the musical “Bravo.” Lines of diners stretched past buffet tables.
Kazunori Oishi, who formerly headed infectious-disease surveillance at Japan’s National Institute of Infectious Diseases, said it was a ripe environment for the virus to spread. Delays in recognizing the danger “created a lot of occasions for close contact,” said Dr. Oishi, especially the eating, drinking and conviviality that is common in the close confines of a cruise ship.
On the evening of Feb. 3, the Diamond Princess arrived in Tokyo Bay. Japanese health officials met the ship. They took the temperature of passengers and later collected throat swabs from those suspected of having the virus.
The next day, Feb. 4, passengers mingled without restrictions or warnings, said Mr. Vincent, the retired airline executive. “We could eat where we want, we could go where we want.”
Early the next morning, everything changed. Around 6:30 a.m. a captain’s announcement startled passengers. He ordered them to stay in their cabins. Shortly after, he said that 10 people had tested positive for the virus. Then he announced that everyone on board was under quarantine for two weeks. The only exception was one nobody wanted: a positive test for the virus.
Quarantine officers first entered the ship without full body suits, and one contracted the virus.
Over the following days, dozens of people a day tested positive. A parade of ambulances ferried them to hospitals. As fear spread, some passengers called for everyone on board to be tested. Japan rejected the request, citing logistical hurdles.
With many elderly people under stress, other medical problems emerged. Mr. Vincent’s wife, Kimberly Vincent, 73, learned that a friend on the ship suffered a stroke and was taken to a hospital.
Tadashi Chida, a retired university professor in his 70s, organized an impromptu group, the Emergency Support Network for Those Living Under Quarantine on the Diamond Princess. The group submitted two sheets of handwritten demands to a health ministry official aboard the Diamond Princess.
Among other things, they asked for faster refills for people who were running out of their medical prescriptions. They also asked for clean sheets. Both demands were met a few days later. More than 100 doctors, pharmacists and nurses are now on the Diamond Princess every day.
Passengers have since been allowed stroll the deck for an hour in limited groups. They have been told to stay at least 6 feet from others.
Mrs. Williamson said she and her husband weren’t interested. “We’d rather stay in our cabins and exercise and not expose ourselves,” she said.
Meals are still being prepared on the ship. When the food arrives, the Williamsons have to put on a protective mask before opening the door. “Every time service comes around, we say, ‘Wait, wait, wait,’ and go to put on our mask,” Mrs. Williamson said.
Kent Frasure’s wife, Rebecca Frasure, was among 41 people on board diagnosed with the virus on Feb. 7. She remains in an isolation ward of a Tokyo hospital. Mr. Frasure, 42, has tested negative. He is anxious for the couple to be reunited and worries the quarantine may stretch longer than two weeks.
“If this goes past Feb. 19, there will be panic, Mr. Frasure said. “Then it will be, ‘Are we ever going to get off the boat?’ ”
Not all shipboard amenities have disappeared. The Valentine’s Day box dinner included teriyaki shrimp and heart-shaped chocolate mousse.
“The pastry chef is my hero,” said Mrs. Courter, the American novelist on board. “I think he thinks he can sedate us with chocolate, which, you know, is not a crazy idea.”
Miho Inada, Rachel Yeo and Betsy McKay contributed to this article. 
Graphics by Roque Ruiz and Elbert Wang.


Trump administration to send ...


Trump administration to send border patrol officers to sanctuary cities

The Trump administration will begin sending 100 border patrol officers to so-called sanctuary cities to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). 

A senior official with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) told NBC News that the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers were being deployed to work with ICE from February to May to “enhance integrity of the immigration system, protect public safety, and strengthen our national security.” 

The decision to deploy the officers comes as Trump administration officials hammer sanctuary cities, which limit cooperation between local authorities and immigration enforcement officers.

The decision can extend the scope of CBP’s enforcement authority. The agency typically detains people along the border and at other entrances into the country and has broad powers within 100 miles of a border. Meanwhile, ICE conducts immigration raids in non-border parts of the country.

Acting ICE Director Matthew Albence confirmed the cooperation to The Hill, saying in a statement that in "jurisdictions where we are not allowed to assume custody" of immigrants from jail, their immigration officers were "forced to make at-large arrests" of immigrants who had been "released into communities." 

"When sanctuary cities release these criminals back to the street, it increases the occurrence of preventable crimes, and more importantly, preventable victims," he said. 

A DHS spokesperson added to The Hill that the cooperation will help ICE, which "does not have sufficient resources to effectively manage the sustained increase in non-detained cases which is exacerbated by the rise of sanctuary jurisdictions."

A senior DHS official told NBC News that the cities targeted in the deployment were New York City, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Houston, Boston, New Orleans, Detroit and Newark, N.J. 

President Trump has long railed against sanctuary cities, accusing them of enacting policies that allow criminals to remain in the country. 

“Democrats must change the Immigration Laws FAST. If not, Sanctuary Cities must immediately ACT to take care of the Illegal Immigrants - and this includes Gang Members, Drug Dealers, Human Traffickers, and Criminals of all shapes, sizes and kinds. CHANGE THE LAWS NOW!” he tweeted last year.
Democrats must change the Immigration Laws FAST. If not, Sanctuary Cities must immediately ACT to take care of the Illegal Immigrants - and this includes Gang Members, Drug Dealers, Human Traffickers, and Criminals of all shapes, sizes and kinds. CHANGE THE LAWS NOW!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 14, 2019



Finally, President Trump Moves to Gain Control of the White House Personnel System and His Administration



Earlier, I posted a story on a speech by former White House Chief of Staff and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly in which he revealed that he was basically opposed to President Trump and his agenda and yet took a job in his administration anyway, apparently seeing himself as some sort of fail-safe device.

This is an example of a larger problem and an ongoing critique of the Trump administration which runs something like this: he hired the guy, he knew what he was getting. Or as the TDS sufferers like to say, ‘he hires only the best people.’ (I really, really loathe those people.)


Not to dunk on Chuck Ross or anything, but that is a very superficial view of the situation. Unlike a George Bush (either of them), Donald Trump arrived in Washington, D.C. with no connections to the DC policy establishment. In fact, he arrived after a bruising primary and general election that left him alienated from the GOP establishment. The GOP establishment might not have called his supporters “a basket of deplorables” but they nodded their heads and chuckled when they heard it. The same establishment had gotten rich and fat off illegal immigrant labor and outsourcing American jobs to wherever. They were used to keeping the GOP base in line with promises and crumbs (George W. Bush had GOP majorities for 6 of his 8 years, how much did they accomplish in regards to slowing illegal immigration or reducing abortion?) while delivering zero. When Trump arrived in Washington he was reliant upon the very same people who had opposed his election to staff his administration.

Some hard-core NeverTrumpers were hired in an attempt to placate factions in the GOP. Some cabinet secretaries, like, for instance, James Mattis and Rex Tillerson, pressed to retain Obama appointees or bring in registered Democrats with whom they had worked into senior policy positions. The head of the White House personnel office overseeing the hiring of political appointees went to an “end of the world party” when Trump dispatched Ted Cruz in Indiana. A guerrilla war was fought against the Administration by using the security clearance process to force out many of Trump’s most loyal followers.

Personnel, as they say, is policy. It makes no difference what Trump wishes to do if he doesn’t have the people in place to vigorously follow through and make sure things happen.
The current White House has also welcomed other never-Trumpers into the executive branch for political positions, which number about 4,000 and are filled by each presidential administration. They range from senior officials, whose nominations require Senate confirmation, to policy professionals, lawyers and speechwriters. In past administrations, a candidate’s allegiance to the president was vetted and considered a plus, if not a must. So why is the Trump White House filling any of these spots with people who have been openly (or privately) hostile to the president?
Retired Army Col. Douglas Macgregor summed up the absurdity of the situation on Fox News. “I think President Trump lost control of the whole appointment process in staffing the government shortly after the election,” he said. “He ended up appointing large numbers of people who subsequently brought in their friends, almost all of whom were opposed to Donald Trump and his agenda.”
Indeed, the appointment of never-Trumpers was aggressively championed and insisted upon by some senior Cabinet members. Some candidates were directly approved by the president himself, while others were proposed by White House political staffers as compromise picks with Cabinet secretaries. Many others slipped in because, despite their anti-Trump sentiments, they had not revealed — or were not asked about — their views in public. Some of the appointments appear to have been downright disastrous. Although many never-Trumpers hired early in the president’s term have departed, others have been elevated or reshuffled as new never-Trumpers continue to enter the administration’s ranks.
Among Trump supporters, there’s long been skepticism of the PPO, and the nearly three-year-old messages are likely to amplify concerns of anti-Trump bias within his administration.
Fear about a bias toward establishment picks emerged in 2017, when Trump selected DeStefano to lead the PPO. He had worked as an aide to former House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, before leading Data Trust. Eyebrows raised with appointees with views at odds with some of Trump’s, such as former national security adviser H.R. McMaster, former foreign policy adviser Dina Powell, and Venezuela envoy Elliott Abrams.
“They have slow-walked pro-Trump people to the point that they drop out or lose interest,” a Trump ally close to the White House told the Washington Examiner. “They don’t like the pro-Trump crowd. They like to bring in Bushies.”
A former White House official said DeStefano, 39, set the tone for the PPO with an “us versus them” mentality, often referring to Trump backers as “the MAGA people.”
The official said: “He’s always complaining about how ‘the MAGA people’ are coming after him. But wait, aren’t you supposed to be a MAGA person? Johnny is constantly disparaging the president. He’s always making these jokes that the president is erratic, is irrational.”

This, by the way, is not unique to Trump. Historically, party outsiders have failed or been co-opted by the system because, just like Trump, they arrive with a popular mandate but because they are outsiders, and threatening outsiders at that, the formal and informal levers of power are often out of their reach because they can’t put enough of their supporters in mid-level policy positions. When results don’t materialize, the reformer is turfed out by the voters and we all go back to the way it was.

The inability of President Trump to gain positive control over the selection of personnel who would carry out his policies has, just as much as the Russia Hoax, helped rob him of three years of progress.

The problem of organizational loyalty is not a new one. In the Royal Navy of the Napoleonic Wars era,  the prime threat facing that service was mutiny. Most of the sailors were not happy with their lot, there was no end in sight to the war, pay was irregular, discipline was harsh, life was hard. Once a mutiny took off, it tended to spread like wildfire (see the Spithead and Nore Mutinies that involved dozens of warships). To act as a deterrent to potential mutineers there was a detachment of marines but one of the most inspired strategies employed was to allow a captain assuming command to bring ‘followers’ with him. A captain of a ship-of-the-line could bring upwards of 40 officers and petty officers with him. This provided the captain with a cadre of loyalists who not only knew how he operated but who would act in his interests. If the impeachment process has impressed one fact upon President Trump it seems to be that he now clearly understands the importance of vetted loyal staff in key positions.

In May, the head of the White House personnel office left. A Trump loyalist, John McEntee, who was forced out by John Kelly, has been given the job of filling positions in the administration with pro-Trump people. Hope Hicks, a trusted adviser, has returned after an absence. The NSC is being pared down. While it was undoubtedly overstaffed, it was clearly overstaffed with openly anti-Trump Democrats from CIA and State and Defense. The current cabinet secretaries seem to be taking marching orders from the White House rather than from the entrenched bureaucrats or progressive interest groups.

If Trump is reelected this year, then he will be well-positioned to smoothly transition into a second term strongly supported by an administration fully staffed with people loyal to Trump’s agenda. If the worst happens, then this move is a sure contender for a winner of the Too Little Too Late Award.

Lisa Page Posts Pic Celebrating that Andrew McCabe Got Off

 View image on Twitter
 Article by Nick Arama in "RedState":

Many people were upset yesterday over the decision by the the Justice Department, specifically Assistant U.S. Attorneys out of the D.C. office, not to prosecute former FBI official Andrew McCabe.

The DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz had made a criminal referral for McCabe after the IG determined that McCabe had repeatedly lied about having authorized a subordinate to share information with a reporter for an article about the FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation. McCabe was fired from the FBI as a result. 

Many saw it as another example of a “two-tiered” system of justice, especially coming on the heels of controversy over an initial sentence recommendation of a 7-9 year sentence for Trump friend Roger Stone for a first offense non-violent crime. People associated with Trump? Gone after for anything and everything, arrested with guns drawn at 6 a.m. in the morning, locked up in solitary, given the harshest sentences versus Democrats or people viewed as being against Trump, let off without any prosecution, even with clear evidence.

However, while many on the right were disturbed, there were those who were celebrating that he got off. 

Infamous former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, known for her biased messages against the president with her married lover FBI official Peter Strzok, tweeted out congratulations to McCabe, as she held a glass of wine and wore a shirt with the words, “I am done being quiet.”


Cheers, Andy.

 People noted her gloating that he got away with lying. 

You have to admire the cocky nature of these people. They know what they did, and who they did, and they know that they get away with it.

 Well, not exactly, because Trump is still their president. 


Definitely bookmarking this tweet.
Gloating always comes before the fall. (Jussie Smollett knows what I'm talking bout.)


Oh, and Lisa? Just another small point. 

The DOJ letter saying they wouldn’t be going ahead with prosecution of McCabe referred solely to the findings of the IG report. The Durham report is still coming, and both you and he may hear more from that.

https://www.redstate.com/nick-arama/2020/02/15/lisa-page-posts-pic-celebrating-that-andrew-mccabe-got-off/ 

Deep State using NYTimes to spin...

Deep State using NYTimes to spin Durham’s investigation into a witch hunt against Obama intel officials



Another planted story aimed at discrediting the Durham probe must mean he's getting closer to the truth

Posted on February 14, 2020 


(TNS) More evidence that U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal investigation into the origins of the “Spygate” ‘Russian collusion’ hoax is making some people very nervous was evident Friday in a story published by The New York Times that was obviously planted by the deep state.

The crux of the planted Times story was evident in the first paragraph: To discredit Durham’s findings as nothing more than a Trump-inspired partisan witch-hunt against the god king Barack Obama.

The lede:
Trump administration officials investigating the government’s response to Russia’s election interference in 2016 appear to be hunting for a basis to accuse Obama-era intelligence officials of hiding evidence or manipulating analysis about Moscow’s covert operation, according to people familiar with aspects of the inquiry.
Translation: ‘The bad orange man, who’s been lying all along about Russian collusion, wants his Justice Department to provide him with manufactured evidence he can use to pin the story on his predecessor.’

The Times continues:

Since his election, President Trump has attacked the intelligence agencies that concluded that Russia secretly tried to help him win, fostering a narrative that they sought to delegitimize his victory. He has long promoted the investigation by John H. Durham, the prosecutor examining their actions, as a potential pathway to proving that a deep-state cabal conspired against him.

Questions asked by Mr. Durham, who was assigned by Attorney General William P. Barr to scrutinize the early actions of law enforcement and intelligence officials struggling to understand the scope of Russia’s scheme, suggest that Mr. Durham may have come to view with suspicion several clashes between analysts at different intelligence agencies over who could see each other’s highly sensitive secrets, the people said.
Mr. Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result — and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal, the people said.

Translation No. 2: This planted story is an attempt to convince Americans that Trump is doing what he is accusing Obama of doing — because Durham is obviously getting closer to the truth:
But officials from the F.B.I. and the National Security Agency have told Mr. Durham and his investigators that such an interpretation is wrong and based on a misunderstanding of how the intelligence community functions, the people said. National security officials are typically cautious about sharing their most delicate information, like source identities, even with other agencies inside the executive branch.

Of course ‘officials’ would say that Durham’s hunch is ‘wrong.’
More:
Mr. Durham’s questioning is certain to add to accusations that Mr. Trump is using the Justice Department to go after his perceived enemies, like Mr. Brennan, who has been an outspoken critic of the president. Mr. Barr, who is overseeing the investigation, has come under attack in recent days over senior Justice Department officials’ intervention to lighten a prison sentencing recommendation by lower-level prosecutors for Mr. Trump’s longtime friend Roger J. Stone Jr.

And there you have it: This is all just an act of revenge by President Trump. There’s really nothing to his allegations, and there never has been. This Durham probe is the president going on a ‘witch hunt.’ Spygate was all on the level, you see, and anyway, Russia, Russia, Russia.

We get these planted stories in wholly compromised outlets like the Times, CNN, and the Washington Post generally when officials are getting close to findings or actions that will be injurious or criminally actionable against deep state actors who are not so much loyal to Obama as they are opponents of a president — Trump — whom they see as an interloping fool challenging their supremacy.

We already know that Durham’s probe has turned into a criminal investigation, meaning at some point last fall, he found evidence suggesting that lawbreaking occurred at some level, and directly in regards to the government’s counterintelligence probe into Trump’s 2016 campaign.
We already know that there were serial (criminal) abuses of the FISA court.

And in January, as we reported, we discovered that Durham’s investigation had widened to include examination of a trove of “post-election documents.” Specifically:

From her new perch at CBS News, ace national security and investigative reporter Cathrine Herridge reported late last week that Durham, appointed directly by Attorney General William Barr, was onto a “strong paper trail” of documents that surfaced in the first several months following the president’s inauguration in January of 2017.

As reported by fellow ace investigative correspondent Sara A. Carter, “The documents, which are being kept close hold, were hinted at by Attorney General William Barr in an interview he did with NBC in December and reported on by CBS News Friday.”

Carter notes that the documents “span a time period from January, 2017 until May 2017, just before the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller.”

Now, suddenly, a ‘story’ in the Times claiming that Durham’s probe has turned into an excuse to falsely accuse Obama-era intelligence officials of improperly targeting the Trump campaign.
Coincidence? There is no such thing in Washington.