Monday, January 13, 2020

3D Chess — How President Trump Put Everything Together, From Fracking to Iranian Freedom



Despite frantic denials by the left and more than a few on the right, President Trump is indeed playing 3D Chess. Everyone else, on the other hand, is still trying to figure out how to open the box the checkers came in. Think about it. Right now we have the leftist naysayers (and even a few conservatives) decrying every decision President Trump has made regarding Iran. However, eight-and-a-half hours ahead of Eastern Standard Time, Iranians are demonstrating against their own government, calling for the resignation of the Mullahs now leading their nation.

Here is the best part: Government stooges evidently believed that forcibly bussing folks into downtown Tehran, would demonstrate the wild popularity of the government and its national hero (what’s left of him still remains at ambient temperature). Instead, there have been massive and widespread protests against the government. It gets better. The aforementioned stooges, as is their usual procedure, spread large American and Israeli flags on the ground for people to walk upon and spit on while screeching “Death To America!” and “Death To The Zionists!” Much to the surprise of those stooges and the vast majority of the political left in the United States, the overwhelming majority of folks present refused to walk on either flag. Instead, they booed and shouted “Shame on You!” to the (obviously) government agents striding across them. My good friend and colleague Betsy Vaughn has an outstanding piece on this with all the details.

Opinion: 3D Chess -- How President Trump Put Everything Together, From Fracking to Iranian Freedom
Screen shot: https://twitter.com/HeshmatAlavi/status/1216343324283539457

Here is the sad part. The left, in the form of House Speaker Pelosi, Minority Leader Schumer and the rest of the usual suspects, along with their enablers from the Fourth Estate, insist on referring to Soleimani as a “national hero” while shrieking warnings that President Trump is pushing us into an all-out war with Iran.

How did we get here? There were a lot of moves…some apparent and others, not so much. I can’t get into each of them, as Red State requires its authors to be pithy in their prose. Besides, I would likely miss several of the moves that are even today, quite invisible. The theme I’d like you, gentle reader, to keep forefront in your mind, is that success begets success and while he appears to some to be a bellicose buffoon, Donald J. Trump is dumb…dumb like a fox.

Let’s review some of the outwardly unrelated items the President has ticked off of his campaign list. He has

Cut regulation. Especially in the oil industry (fracking). Result: We are now a net energy exporter and this has helped spur economic growth while totally eliminating our dependence on foreign oil.

Cut taxes. Result: Huge economic growth and consumer confidence.

100 Miles of new wall built. Result: Fewer successful attempts at border penetration.

Gotten NATO partners to not only start ponying up their treaty-required share of costs, but also has them contributing assets in the Syria battlespace. They have also agreed to take a larger role in helping the United States prevent Iranian development of nuclear weapons. That’s a recent development resulting from our effort at removing a bad actor from the terrorist force pool.

Pardoned a number of military members who had been railroaded in the Military Justice System (UCMJ). He followed that up with a public (via Twitter) direct order countering an obviously retributive action contemplated by an Admiral who obviously hadn’t gotten the message. This would bring the U.S. Military back under the control of the Commander in Chief.

Put Iran On Notice. Finally, after showing tempered restraint at previous Iranian provocations, he made the right call and ordered our valiant warriors (yes, Democrats and Obama holdovers in DOD, he can give orders) to terminate a known and declared state-sponsored terrorist, with extreme and public prejudice.

Some time ago, I knocked out a short piece about Trump having a laser pointer and is using it on his cats…the Democrats and their enablers the press.

This is over half of what has been going on for the first three years of the Trump Presidency. President Trump says and does numerous “outrageous” things, that get the left stirred up over a 72-96 hour news cycle. Inevitably, things turn out such that he was exactly correct in what he said/did. Then he starts it all over again with an early morning tweet. As time has gone on, the left has gotten so frustrated that they are frothing-at-the-mouth, insanely angry. That frustration and anger, along with their rabid hatred, gets them to say and do politically stupid things.

Meanwhile, and not so publicly, President Trump has gone about undoing decades of bogus regulations that serve little purpose but to provide a reason to keep an army of bureaucrats on the public payroll. He regularly sends judicial nominees over to the Senate, which has become, in the words of the far-left online publication Slate, (emphasis mine) “a judicial confirmation machine.”

While the House of Representatives debates articles of impeachment against Donald Trump on Wednesday, the Senate will confirm 13 of the president’s judicial nominees. The continued churn of Trump’s judicial confirmation machine ensures that the impact of his soon-to-be-tainted presidency will be felt for decades.

How does all of this tie together? Is it just dumb luck? Let’s review: At this point, President Trump is in the position of watching the Iranian people defend U.S. and Israeli flags, while celebrating the Trump-directed death of a mass murderer of Iranians, while the leftists in the United States have put themselves in the position of appearing to support the Iranian government and that same mass murderer.

Let’s put it together:

The Iranian People: They see a tough, focused leader who is decisive. He is also measured. He took no lethal action when our drone was shot down. After all, it was only equipment. But when a U.S. citizen was murdered by terrorist action and our embassy was overrun and occupied, that was a different story. They also see a possible Paladin.

Europe: They now see a tough negotiator who is dealing from a position of strength. After all, as I’ve noted previously, due to our newfound energy independence, the United States no longer has quite as much reason to risk our blood and treasure in Southwest Asia. Europe is another matter. They need Southwest Asia far more than we do. Again, more leverage for the President to insist on them putting more skin in the game.

The Military: They initially saw a political neophyte whose trust they could play upon. They tried him with the Gallagher affair and got put in their Constitutional place. During this latest Iranian episode, they gave him a range of options, one of which they obviously considered a “throw-away option”with which to respond, Trump, the man of action, took that one. Once again he demonstrated he was willing to do what it takes to take bad actors off the battlefield.

And most importantly, The American People: They are adding all of this up. Donald J. Trump came down the escalator and made a number of promises to the American People. He promised to fix the economy, fix immigration (Build The Wall!), get us out of endless wars, and Make American Great Again! Pundits recounting the initial phase of the war in Iraq, like to use the phrase “20 Days to Baghdad.” That’s incorrect. it was 2 years—and 20 days. It took the better part of two years, just to prepare the battlefield and get all the stuff and all the people where they needed to be, in order to achieve that 20-day success.

President Donald J. Trump has done the same thing. Through highly visible public statements and actions, along with many, well-below-the-radar initiatives, he has assembled a machine that has Iranians declaring, “America and Israel are not our enemies, but the Mullahs are.” Meanwhile, the leftists in the United States are seen as supporting murderers. He’s put all the pieces in place over 36 months to achieve a huge objective in what seems like one week. At home, he’s built a burgeoning economy and as he promised, built at this point 200 miles of wall. He gets stuff done. he does his best to do what most politicians don’t, keep his campaign promises. How do you believe that will play out in November?

Man who shot church gunman gets highest Texas civilian honor

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Gov. Greg Abbott on Monday gave Texas’ highest civilian honor to a 71-year-old man who shot and killed an armed attacker at a church in December.
Abbott gave Jack Wilson the Governor’s Medal of Courage during a ceremony in Austin, calling him a hero for stopping the shooter at a church in the small town of White Settlement.
Wilson, a firearms instructor who trained the West Freeway Church of Christ’s volunteer security team, shot the attacker once in head after he opened fire with a shotgun in the church’s sanctuary. Wilson’s single shot quickly ended the attack in which two parishioners, killed 64-year-old Anton “Tony” Wallace and 67-year-old Richard White, were killed.
“When events arise, you’re going to do one of two things. You’re either going to step up and do what’s right or walk away. And I’m not one to walk away,” Wilson said in accepting the medal at the Texas Governor’s Mansion.

Wages Soar Fastest Among Those With...


Wages Soar Fastest among Those with the Least



A bipartisan plan to erase barriers to equity ownership would be productive and beautiful.


It’s an article of liberal faith: Thanks to President Donald Trump’s $1.5 trillion Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the prosecco is popping on Wall Street, while the unsold Pepsi gathers dust on Main Street, where Americans are too poor to buy soft drinks.

“Workers are delivering more, and they’re getting a lot less,” former vice president Joe Biden told the Brookings Institution last summer. “There’s no correlation now between productivity and wages.”

Americans “are sick and tired of the income and wealth inequality that sees the rich getting much richer,” Senator Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) told CapitalAndMain.com last month.

Wages have largely stagnated,” the campaign website of Senator Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) complains, while “fundamental changes in our economy have left millions of working families hanging on by their fingernails.”

These grim, lachrymose myths cannot mask this incredibly upbeat fact: The sparkling wine is flowing on Wall and Main streets, and it’s running more rapidly on Main, where take-home pay is expanding the most among those with the least.

Never mind the liberal lies. Hard data reveal this reality. The Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank’s monthly Wage Growth Tracker shows that Americans are making more money, particularly those who have been forgotten for decades.

Between November 2018 and November 2019, overall median wage growth climbed 3.6 percent, a healthy pace that should lift spirits, too. Those in the bottom 25 percent saw wages advance 4.5 percent, while the top 25 percent lagged, with pay rising just 2.9 percent. This is the 180-degree exact opposite of what Democrats relentlessly bellow. They have equal access to the Atlanta Fed’s website. This confirms their rank dishonesty.
  • When it comes to race, wage growth for whites was a tick behind, at 3.5 percent, while non-whites charged ahead at 4.3 percent.
  • In terms of age, the young and the restless rule. Those ages 16 to 24 saw wages climb 8.4 percent. Americans 25 to 54 enjoyed 3.9 percent higher paychecks. And the typically higher-income 55-plus crowd was behind the curve, with 2.5 percent wage growth.
  • Bachelor’s degrees generated 3.7 percent wage boosts for those who held them. But those who went no further than high-school graduation also savored 3.7 percent higher pay. Those with associate degrees saw their checks grow just 3.2 percent.
  • While those in finance and business services scored 4.1 percent higher salaries, workers in manufacturing, construction, and mining were in a photo finish with them at 4.0 percent.
  • While job stayers earned 3.2 percent more money, job switchers scored an extra 4.3 percent.
  • Interestingly enough, those with low, medium, and high skills all shared 3.6 percent wage increases, matching the nationwide bonus.

For further sanguine results of Trumponomics, see Sentier Research’s analysis of the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey. Sentier clocked U.S. median household income last November at $66,043 — $5,070 higher than this key metric’s position when President Trump was inaugurated on January 20, 2017: $60,973. This 8.3 percent increase in middle-class income in less than three years crushes the two-term, eight-year performances of Obama ($1,043, up 1.7 percent) and G. W. Bush (an emaciated $401, or a paltry 0.7 percent boost).

Today’s Employment Situation also is encouraging. As the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported at 8:30 a.m., the unemployment rate remains steady at 3.5 percent, maintaining the lowest joblessness level since 1969 — Richard Nixon’s first year in office. Employers created 145,000 new jobs last month, a healthy, if not breathtaking, number. And 2.9 percent wage growth, from December 2018 to December 2019, lags the Atlanta Fed’s figures but still approximates the 3 percent mark that seems to trigger warmth and toastiness. Scarlett O’Hara’s words should soothe any naysayers here: “Tomorrow is another day.”

Democrats should stop loathing Trump long enough to show some love for the poor people they claim to represent. Democrats should stop lying to themselves and the country about low-income wages lagging those of the affluent. This is not happening. Democrats should acknowledge the wonders that Trump and Republicans have done via tax reduction, regulatory relief, and a pro-business tone in Washington.

Then, Democrats should make this challenge to Republicans. The 55 percent of Americans who are in the stock markets, per Gallup, are seeing their portfolios soar, as the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq break records. Since Trump’s victory, these markets have rocketed 53 percent, 58 percent, and 77 percent, respectively, as of Thursday’s highest-ever closing bells.

But the 45 percent of Americans who own no stocks — directly or as part of 401(k)s or IRA accounts — are missing this bonanza.

Democrats should ask Republicans to work with them to make it as easy as possible for those not invested in the stock market to buy in. A bipartisan plan to erase barriers to equity ownership would be productive and beautiful.

Conversely, Democrats can keep weeping among themselves as their have-not base actually grows richer more swiftly than the haves the Democrats love to hate.


Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor of National Review Online,
 and a senior fellow with the London Center for Policy Research.

A Fair Senate Impeachment Trial? That’s What They’re Afraid Of



Mitch McConnell will not abide by the kangaroo court rules Adam Schiff used in the House and Nancy Pelosi seeks to impose on the Senate.

On January 7, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) wrote her Democratic colleagues to explain her strategy and to respond to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-Ky.) announcement that he would not negotiate impeachment trial procedures with the House. Instead, McConnell simply plans to use the procedures employed in the Clinton impeachment. Pelosi responded by writing:
Sadly, Leader McConnell has made clear that his loyalty is to the President and not the Constitution. Leader McConnell has insisted that the approach under consideration is identical to those of the Clinton trial and that “fair is fair.” This is simply not true. This process is not only unfair but designed to deprive Senators and the American people of crucial documents and testimony. Under the Clinton trial, witnesses were deposed.
I encourage you to review the attached document from Leader Schumer, which exposes Leader McConnell’s misleading claims about the Clinton trial process that are being used to justify the GOP’s decision to cover up witnesses and documentation that would fully expose the President’s wrongdoing.

That attachment sets forth six alleged “differences” between the Clinton impeachment circumstances and those of the Trump impeachment. All six basically boil down to one key concern that at the time of the Clinton Senate trial, “witnesses had already testified under oath in the grand jury and their testimony was available to the Senate. Everyone knew what they were going to say—because they had already said it.”

In contrast, Democrats have yet to hear from former National Security Advisor John Bolton, acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, Mulvaney advisor Robert Blair, and Office of Management and Budget official Michael Duffey, because they “refused to testify in the House even though they were deeply involved in the events in question.”

It’s an intellectually dishonest argument. The House abandoned all efforts to use the courts to compel the testimony of these witnesses. As I noted earlier:
The House Democrats have had their discovery. They had access to subpoenas and voluntary cooperation from witnesses. The White House turned over documents and published the transcript of President Trump’s July 25 call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky. No mas. Democrats voluntarily abandoned court assistance in enforcing subpoenas. By issuing articles of impeachment, the Democrats declared that they’re ready for trial.

McConnell echoed the same during a speech on the floor. “It’s not a constitutional crisis for a House to want more information than a president wants to give up,” McConnell said. “That’s not a constitutional crisis! It’s a routine occurrence. Separation of powers is messy—by design. Here’s what should have happened . . . either the president and Congress negotiate a settlement or the third branch of government, the judiciary, addresses the dispute between the other two.”

“Nobody made Chairman Schiff do this,” McConnell said of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s (D-Calif.) decision to forego court assistance to overcome the president’s lack of cooperation with the probe.

“In Nixon, the courts were allowed to do their work. In Clinton, the courts were allowed to do their work,” McConnell said.

“Fair” Is Foul

But, mind you, the process will only be deemed fair if the Democrats but notthe Republicans get witnesses in the Senate trial. So, for example, Adam Schiff won’t be called as a witness (even though he claimed to have secret information about the case). Democrats oppose forcing the whistleblower to testify because of some unwritten rule requiring his identity to remain secret.

Meanwhile, Joe Biden indicated he intended to refuse to comply with any subpoena to testify in the Senate trial—claiming there is “no legal basis” for such a subpoena. He later clarified, “I am just not going to pretend that there is any legal basis for Republican subpoenas for my testimony in the impeachment trial. That is the point I was making yesterday and I reiterate: this impeachment is about Trump’s conduct, not mine.”

Schiff recently took to Twitter in a lame attempt to embarrass McConnell with old footage of him speaking on what should happen in Bill Clinton’s Senate trial 20 years ago.

“There have been 15 impeachments in the history of this country,” McConnell tells Larry King in the two-decade-old interview, and in “13 impeachments there were witnesses. It’s not unusual to have a witness in a trial. It’s certainly not unusual to have a witness in an impeachment trial.”

Schiff failed to gather evidence for his own case (not that any such evidence even existed). The House impeached the president without enough evidence to prove its case. Now they’re trying to shift blame to the Senate for their malpractice.

In fact, there is nothing inconsistent between McConnell 20 years ago and McConnell today. Witnesses are fine if the process leads you there, McConnell says in both instances. But the Democrats don’t know what these witnesses will say. They want to use the Senate floor as a quasi-grand jury instead of trying a case based upon an established record. And, of course, they want to place off limits any witness who might corroborate the president’s defense that the Bidens’ shenanigans did indeed warrant investigation.

McConnell will not abide by the kangaroo court rules Schiff used in the House and Pelosi seeks to impose on the Senate. If witnesses are to be called, McConnell recently told Sean Hannity in a telephone interview, the Senate will not tolerate them only being witnesses for the House managers. The president has already made clear that he intends to call Joe and Hunter Biden as well as Adam Schiff to prove his innocence.

I wish to remind readers of an observation I made in May 2018: “But there won’t be a trial in the Senate. The Get Trump crowd can’t win a fair fight. They can’t put up the goods when called upon to do so.” If I’m wrong about the trial in the Senate, I won’t be wrong about their inability to deliver the goods.

Trump Administration Tells China Not to Buy Iranian Oil or More Sanctions.



Even if you hate Donald Trump, you have to admire his willingness to take on the Chinese. Name another U.S. administration that constantly would tell them to do X or you are gonna get Z.

The latest case in point:

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin announced on Sunday that the United States has asked China and some of our European allies to stop buying any oil from Iran to cut off any trickle of income to the regime in control there. If they don’t, then they will get hit by the sanctions hammer.

From Fox News
“We’ve cut off probably over 95% of the oil revenues, so there’s a very small amount of oil revenues, and you’re right, a component of that, a big component of that is China,” Mnuchin said. “I sat down with the Chinese officials. They flew in a delegation to meet with us and the State Department to talk about this. They’ve cut off all of the state companies from buying oil, and we’re working closely with them to make sure that they cease all additional oil activities.”

This carrot and stick approach that Trump is using is most impressive, yet it is the most confusing thing to those of his detractors who would have loved any other President to stand up to China. Telling China to stop purchasing oil from Iran while also in negotiations on huge trade deals in the U.S. that could affect our economy is a big gamble.

Doing it in an election year is pretty brave/crazy depending on where you fall on the I love/hate POTUS #45 scale.

After years of tough talk with China, we are now seeing it in action. We won’t be able to tell how everything shakes out until all is settled — possibly years from now — but it is interesting to see as we move through it at the moment. (cont.)

Individual Freedom Is Bigger Than...

No, George Will, 

Individual Freedom Is Bigger Than Market Choice

No, George Will, Individual Freedom Is Bigger Than Market Choice

There was a time when I read George Will religiously. My parents gave me a volume of his columns for Christmas when I was thirteen, if I remember. He was my introduction to Aristotle and Edmund Burke, to James Madison and Alexis DeTocqueville. Will was a teacher as well as a commentator in his writing, and I learned much from him. And back then, he was still a conservative.

Times change. These days Will spends his columns sneering at Donald Trump and the rural, “non-college-educated” working class, bashing pro-worker trade policies and pro-family tax reforms. And in today’s installment, he dismisses my call to revive American community as an affront to capitalism and—wait for it—individual liberty! It must be hard being so angry all the time. 

Will’s fulminations are typical of a certain set of Clinton and Bush-era commentators who call themselves “conservative” but sound more like a cartoon version of libertarianism. Will shrugs at the decline of the working class and the loss of the communities that sustain them. He celebrates instead the “spontaneous order of a market society,” by which he apparently means woke capital, offshoring, and the growing corporatist alliance between big government and big business. 

Will advises working families displaced by lost jobs and neighborhoods to shut up and move, like the Joad family in Steinbeck’s “Grapes of Wrath.” Packing up all their belongings and abandoning their family farm demonstrated the Joads’ “dignity,” Will opines. Interesting. He might want to re-read Steinbeck. 

Or Edmund Burke. Will casts himself as a champion of individual liberty, but his reduction of individual freedom to market choice—the right to buy cheap stuff from China—wouldn’t have made any sense to Burke. (Or the American founders. Or the voters who cast their ballots for Donald Trump.) 

Burke understood that individual freedom is formed by culture and community, and you have to work to defend both. The “little platoons,” Burke said—home and church, school and neighborhood—are where we grow, where we learn to love, where we find the strength and support to make something of our lives. And they are where we forge the common bonds that sustain our national sense of purpose. 

The problem today is that our little platoons are faltering under relentless pressure from the “global economy” that Will loves and China exploits and the ceaseless denigration of cultural elites. 

Statistics tell us we face an epidemic of loneliness and isolation across all segments of our society. Deaths of despair are soaring. Suicides, drug overdoses, and alcoholism together claim more lives now than ever in our history. And Americans’ participation in civic groups and social gatherings continues to decline, even as whole neighborhoods and towns wither. 

As the little platoons fade, so too does our sense of individual agency and national belonging. More Americans report feeling powerless and unheard than ever before. Burke would have understood why. Without the fellowship of our shared communities, “no one generation [can] link with the other,” Burke said. “Men would become little better than the flies of summer.” 

There are many causes of this crisis, including faulty economic and trade policy that has favored the highly educated “front row” over the working class for decades, and a conception of freedom pushed relentlessly by academia and cultural leaders that denigrates community, church, and home. 

Will is offended I would broach any of these subjects. He purports not to recognize the facts I describe. He really ought to get out more. The “individualism” he lauds as a theory is in fact much more than that. It is a way of life that needs defending. It’s a shame he won’t defend it any longer. 

YouTube blocks links to...

YouTube blocks links to texts of Virginia anti-gun Bills

YouTube is now blocking links to the State of Virginia Legislative Information System (LIS).  On Saturday, the YouTube channel Guns & Gadgets posted a video titled “Virginia Anti-Gun Bills To Be Heard Jan 13,” wherein the proprietor discussed the 10 bills that will come before the Virginia legislature beginning January 13.  In the video’s description, he listed LIS links to the text for each bill.  As of 1 a.m. Sunday morning, YouTube was blocking the links with the following warning:

Does the State(sic)*** of Virginia know that YouTube suspects their site of “malware, phishing attempts, or disturbing content?”  The anti-gun bills are certainly disturbing, but probably not in the way that YouTube intended to convey.

What we are witnessing is an attack by the media on the citizens of Virginia.  Media oligarchs don’t want you to see the laws that politicians are about to pass.  We can ask, “Why bother having sunshine laws, when the oligarchy will attempt to block the sunshine?”  Remember, the virulent left has a strategy.  As Nancy Pelosi said, “...we have to pass the bill so that you can, ah, find out what is in it…”

On Friday, the Virginia legislature voted to ban firearms in the Capitol building and in the legislative offices of the Pocahontas building.  In a case of guns for us but not for thee, Sen. Amanda Chase (R-11th) has worn a gun on the Senate floor, but suddenly the majority of Democrat lawmakers are worried about their safety if law abiding Virginia citizens are allowed into the building with holstered firearms, as they have been allowed in the past. 

The gun ban was designed and passed as a preemptive strike on lawful citizens to disarm them before Lobby Day on Jan. 20, when at least 100 bus loads of citizens will arrive at the Capitol to confront Democrat lawmakers over their anti-gun agenda.  The gun ban is a perfect expression of why we have the second amendment.  

Lawmakers seek their own safety at the expense of the citizenry, and genuinely believe that law abiding citizens are the unsafe elements of society.  The Second Amendment exists to secure our own rights and our own safety against the very tyrants who believe we are the unsafe ones.  Listen to House Speaker Eileen Filler-Corn (D-41st) : 
Our focus here is to keep everybody safe, said Filler-Corn. These are policies and rules that should have passed a long, long time ago and we’re excited and pleased that we’re moving forward now with the goal of keeping everybody safe.
Have you ever noticed how liberal regressive politicians who are openly suborning the Constitution and going backwards in history are always “excited and pleased” and are “moving forward” and “keeping everybody safe?”   The vulgarity of their verbiage is insufferable.

The Democrats’ hypocrisy is on full display in SB 70, a bill to require universal background checks on all firearm transfers. On Lobby Day, all of the thousands of firearm owners who may show up carrying firearms will already have passed a background check, and many will have gone through the legal process to get a concealed carry permit.  

And yet, despite all background checks and legalities, the liberal regressive Democrats have banned these gun owners from entering the Capitol building with guns. Why are they banned?  They are banned because safety checked gun owners make Democrats feel unsafe.

We have to ask, if the Democrats fear for their safety in the presence of verified safe gun owners, why do they believe that even more of the same background checks are going to make anyone else safe?

On Lobby Day, the Capitol grounds will probably be the safest place in Virginia.  On Lobby Day, the Capitol building likely will be protected by thousands of law-abiding gun owners legally carrying firearms for their own protection and the protection of the crowd.  Meanwhile, inside the Capitol building, Democrat lawmakers will be huddling in fear behind Capitol police while they confront disarmed, safety checked gun owners --  because, well, those patriots just scare them.

What we are seeing is the same preemptive, flip-the-script, political tactics that laid the path for the Antifa riot in Charlottesville.  A week before the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, former Gov. Terry McAuliffe warned people to stay away from Charlottesville, and former University of Virginia President Theresa Sullivan warned people to avoid the rally.  In both of their public statements they sought to delegitimize their political opponents as unsafe, when in reality they were the unsafe political voices.  

In reality, it was the police, the public safety officer of the State of Virginia, and the Governor himself who let a riot happen, and who then blamed it on their opponents.  The investigative report by former U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy laid blame for the violence on Police Chief Al Thomas, who denied it.  The same game is playing out right now, with lawmakers delegitimizing their political opponents, and media oligarchs preparing cover for whatever happens next.

If you want to read them, here are the bills that YouTube is suppressing:
SB 69 One Handgun a Month  (another one)
SB 70 Universal Background Checks  (another one)
SB 240  Red Flag Bill
SB 505  Bans Guns in Government Buildings       

James G. Robertson is a University of Virginia alumnus and occasional blogger.

*** The author clearly has never seen Virginia stationary and lacks some knowledge.
Virginia is a Commonwealth ie The Commonwealth of Virginia.


Democrats become first national party to hate the nation they wish to lead

 Image result for cartoons about the modern "democrat" party

 Article by Eric Utter in "The American Thinker":

Democrats have now officially become the first national political party to actually detest the country they wish to lead.

Democrats have openly sided with America's enemies and even sympathize with the world's most heinous terrorists rather than take the side of the president of the United States, as can be seen by their reaction to the death of Iranian mega-terrorist Qassem Soleimani.

Barack Obama must have succeeded in "fundamentally" transforming the country, because, in days of yore, this would have universally been considered a priori treason.  I honestly believe, if Democrats had their way, American flags would have been ordered to fly at half-staff out of respect and appreciation for the bloodthirsty Iranian general whose death they thought would make Trump look bad.  Democrats and their supporters are so crazy, they applaud white supremacists if they dis Trump, as Joy Behar on ABC's The View did recently.  Many in the media immediately said Trump's drone strike on Soleimani would quite possibly cause World War III to break out.  Some give the impression that they would prefer to have their characterization of the strike as "reckless" be proven correct, even if it meant death and destruction on a massive scale.  That's reckless.  And sick.

Former donkey party greats such as Andrew Jackson, Harry Truman, JFK, and even liberal Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan would be shocked and appalled at what the party they once led has become.  The party is now the bastion of full-fledged socialists, anti-Semites, transgender-worshipers, and God-haters.  It respects no moral code or law, abhors tradition, the Founders — and those who have the temerity to live in rural areas of "fly-over country" (i.e., the "deplorables") — and is actively aiding and abetting the abolition of American history.  It tolerates no dissent from its political correctness and is aggressively attempting to strip Americans of their constitutionally guaranteed rights — and babies from their lives as it ironically tries to invent a "right" to abortion.

There is an old saying, that something or someone is "as American as Mom, baseball, and apple pie."  The Democrats are rapidly rewriting that phrase to better suit their Depraved New World.  It will likely read, "as American as non-binary, childless attraction units, soccer, and tofu."

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/democrats_become_first_national_party_to_hate_the_nation_they_wish_to_lead.html 

McCord is The Key – Devin Nunes Discusses Sketchy Issues Surrounding ICIG Michael Atkinson and Origination of the “Whistle-blower” Complaint

credit: sundance at CTH

House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes appears with Maria Bartiromo to discuss two very important issues.  The first is the origination of the “whistle-blower” complaint and new issues surrounding Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson.  The second important subject is the background of newly installed FISA Court monitor, David Kris, to oversee the FBI reform promises.

CTH has some explosive new information which has been shared with Mr. Nunes on both issues; but we start with the interview and ICIG Michael Atkinson.




Since our original research into Atkinson, there have been some rather interesting additional discoveries.

The key to understanding the corrupt endeavor behind the fraudulent “whistle-blower” complaint, doesn’t actually originate with ICIG Atkinson. The key person is the former head of the DOJ National Security Division, Mary McCord.

Prior to becoming IC Inspector General, Michael Atkinson was the Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General and Senior Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General of the National Security Division, Mary McCord.


It is very safe to say Mary McCord and Michael Atkinson have a working relationship from their time together in 2016 and 2017 at the DOJ-NSD. Atkinson was Mary McCord’s senior legal counsel; essentially her lawyer.

McCord was the senior intelligence officer who accompanied Sally Yates to the White House in 2017 to confront then White House Counsel Don McGahn about the issues with Michael Flynn and the drummed up controversy over the Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak phone call.


Additionally, Mary McCord, Sally Yates and Michael Atkinson worked together to promote the narrative around the incoming Trump administration “Logan Act” violations. This silly claim (undermining Obama policy during the transition) was the heavily promoted, albeit manufactured, reason why Yates and McCord were presumably concerned about Flynn’s contact with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. It was nonsense.

However, McCord didn’t just disappear in 2017 when she retired from the DOJ-NSD. She resurfaced as part of the Lawfare group assembly after the mid-term election in 2018.

THIS IS THE KEY.

Mary McCord joined the House effort to impeach President Trump; as noted in this article from Politico:
“I think people do see that this is a critical time in our history,” said Mary McCord, a former DOJ official who helped oversee the FBI’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and now is listed as a top outside counsel for the House in key legal fights tied to impeachment. “We see the breakdown of the whole rule of law. We see the breakdown in adherence to the Constitution and also constitutional values.”
“That’s why you’re seeing lawyers come out and being very willing to put in extraordinary amounts of time and effort to litigate these cases,” she added. (link)

Former DOJ-NSD Head Mary McCord is currently working for the House Committee (Adam Schiff) who created the impeachment scheme.

Now it becomes critical to overlay that detail with how the “whistle-blower” complain was organized.  Mary McCord’s former NSD attorney, Michael Atkinson, is the intelligence community inspector general who brings forth the complaint.

The “whistle-blower” had prior contact with the staff of the committee.  This is admitted.  So essentially the “whistle-blower” almost certainly had contact with Mary McCord; and then ICIG Michael Atkinson modified the whistle-blower rules to facilitate the outcome.

There is the origination.   That’s where the fraud starts.

The coordination between Mary McCord, the Whistle-blower and Michael Atkinson is why HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff will not release the transcript from Atkinson’s testimony.

It now looks like the Lawfare network constructed the ‘whistle-blower’ complaint aka a Schiff Dossier, and handed it to allied CIA operative Eric Ciaramella to file as a formal IC complaint.  This process is almost identical to the Fusion-GPS/Lawfare network handing the Steele Dossier to the FBI to use as the evidence for the 2016/2017 Russia conspiracy.

Atkinson’s conflict-of-self-interest, and/or possible blackmail upon him by deep state actors who most certainly know his compromise, likely influenced his approach to this whistleblower complaint.   That would explain why the Dept. of Justice Office of Legal Counsel so strongly rebuked Atkinson’s interpretation of his responsibility with the complaint.

In the Justice Department’s OLC opinion, they point out that Atkinson’s internal justification for accepting the whistleblower complaint was poor legal judgement.  

[See Here]  I would say Atkinson’s decision is directly related to his own risk exposure:


Michael Atkinson was moved from DOJ-NSD to become the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) in 2018. What we end up with is a brutally obvious, convoluted, network of corrupt officials; each carrying an independent reason to cover their institutional asses… each individual interest forms a collective fraudulent scheme inside the machinery of government.

Michael Atkinson and Mary McCord worked together in 2016/2017 on the stop-Trump surveillance operation (FISA application via DOJ-NSD).  Then, following the 2018 mid-term election, in 2019 Mary McCord and Michael Atkinson team up again on another stop-Trump operation, each in a different position, and -working with others- coordinate the House impeachment plan via the ‘whistle-blower’ complaint.

While Devin Nunes is focused on the false statements of ICIG Michael Atkinson, the key is the contact between the ‘whistle-blower’ (Eric Ciaramella) and the House Intelligence Committee via Mary McCord.

There’s a very strong likelihood this entire impeachment construct was manufactured out of nothing.

National Security Council resistance member Alexander Vindman starts a rumor about the Trump-Zelenskyy phone call, which he shares with CIA operative Eric Ciaramella (a John Brennan resistance associate).  Ciaramella then makes contact with resistance ally Mary McCord in her role within the House.  McCord then helps Ciaramella create a fraudulent whistle-blower complaint via her former colleague, now ICIG, Michael Atkinson….

…And that’s how this entire Impeachment operation gets started.