Friday, November 29, 2019

Several hurt in Hague stabbing attack

Several people have been hurt in a stabbing in The Hague, Dutch police have said.
The attack happened in the city's main shopping street.
Police said the emergency services were at the scene.
More follows...
https://news.sky.com/story/the-hague-several-hurt-after-stabbing-in-shopping-area-11873848

Media Bias Chart

Media Bias Chart

The AllSides Media Bias Chart offers an easy way to identify political bias in the news so you can be better equipped to navigate our polarized media landscape. The AllSides Media Bias Chart is based on our full and growing list of nearly 600 media bias ratings (note: AllSides rates only online content, not TV or radio content). Our chart helps to free you from filter bubbles so you can consider multiple perspectives and see the full picture. Learn about the different types of media bias.

The AllSides Media Bias Chart is more comprehensive in its methodology than any other media bias chart on the Web. While other media bias charts show you only the subjective opinion of the one person who made it, our Media Bias Rating Methodology is based on multi-partisan, scientific analysis and transparent methodology.

AllSides Media Bias Chart 2019

Here's how the AllSides Media Bias Chart differs from other media bias charts on the web:


  • Data is gathered from a multipartisan team — not just one biased individual. We have a patent on rating bias and use multiple methodologies, not a homogenous group or an algorithm.
  • Our research spans years — we started rating media bias back in 2012.
  • We give different bias ratings for the news and opinion sectionsfor key outlets, giving you a more accurate view.
  • Transparent methodology: we tell you how we arrived at the bias rating of each outlet. Search for any media outlet here.
  • We consider and review data and research conducted by third parties, like universities and other groups.
  • Your opinion matters: we take into account hundreds of thousands of community votes on our ratings. We know that a mixed group of experts and non-experts will provide a more accurate result, so we solicit and consider opinions of average people.
  • We don't rate accuracy or facts — just bias. Our ratings help readers to understand that certain perspectives may be missing if they read only one outlet, or outlets from only one side of the political spectrum.

Americans are more polarized than ever — if you’re like us, you see it in the news and on your social media feeds every day. Bias is natural, but hidden bias and fake news misleads and divides us. That’s why AllSides has rated the media bias of nearly 600 media outlets and writers. The AllSides Media Bias Chart shows the political bias of some of the most popular news outlets in America.

AllSides Media Bias Chart FAQ

1) Why Does the Bias of a Media Outlet Matter?
2) How Does AllSides Calculate Media Bias?
3) How Did AllSides Decide Which Media Outlets to Include on the Chart?
4) What Do the Bias Ratings Mean?
5) Does a Center Rating Mean Neutral and Unbiased?
6) Why Are Some Media Outlets On The Chart Twice?
7) Does AllSides Rate Which Outlets Are Most Factual or Accurate?
8) How Does Version 1.1 of the chart differ from Version 1.0?
9) Where Can I Learn More?
10) I Disagree With Your Media Bias Ratings. Where Can I Give You Feedback?

Why Does the Bias of a Media Outlet Matter?

The mission of AllSides is to free people from filter bubbles so they can better understand the world — and each other. Making media bias transparent helps us to achieve this, and improves our democracy long-term.

Media bias has contributed to making Americans more politically polarized than ever. When we can’t identify, understand and appreciate diverse perspectives, we can’t problem solve or compromise, and democracy suffers.

News media, social media, and search engines have become so biased and personalized that we are stuck in filter bubbles, where we’re only exposed to information and ideas we already agree with. We often end up hating the “The Other Side,” believing they’re wrong or evil.

At AllSides, we reduce the one-sided information flow by providing balanced news and nearly 600 media bias ratings. This can help us to better understand diverse perspectives and reduce hateful polarization in America. By making media bias transparent and consuming a balanced news diet, we can arm ourselves with a broader view — and decide the truth for ourselves.

How Does AllSides Calculate Media Bias?

Our media bias ratings are based on multi-partisan, scientific analysis. Our methodologies include blind surveys, editorial reviews, third party data, and community feedback. Visit our AllSides Media Bias Rating Methodology page to learn more.

How Did AllSides Decide Which Media Outlets to Include on the Chart?

We took into account whether the source was a top outlet in terms of traffic according to Pew Research Center, as well as whether or not it was featured on other media bias charts floating around the Web.

But popularity isn’t our only metric — we also include outlets that are good representations a certain perspective or ideology. For example, Jacobin magazine is included because it represents socialist thought, while Reason magazine is included because it represents libertarian thought.

What Do the Bias Ratings Mean?

These are subjective judgements made by people across the country. Learn our rough approximation for what the media bias ratings mean:

Does a Center Rating Mean Neutral and Unbiased?

A Center media bias rating does not always mean neutral, unbiased or reasonable, just as "far Left" and "far Right" do not always mean "extreme" or "unreasonable." A Center bias rating simply means the source or writer rated does not predictably show opinions favoring either end of the political spectrum — conservative or liberal. Sometimes, a media outlet with a Center rating misses important perspectives, leaving out valid arguments from the left or right.

While it may be easy to think that we should only consume media from Center outlets, AllSides believes Center is not necessarily the answer. By reading only Center outlets, we may still encounter bias and omission of important issues and perspectives. For this reason, it is important to consume a balanced news diet. Learn more about what an AllSides Media Bias Rating of Center rating means here.

You can think of our bias ratings as points of view, each providing pieces of the puzzle, so that we may have a more holistic view.

Why Are Some Media Outlets On The Chart Twice?

The AllSides Media Bias Chart differs from other media bias charts on the Web because we often make a distinction between the source’s news content and its Opinion/Editorial content. This is true for prominent and widely-read media outlets, such as the Wall Street Journal or the New York Times. The distinction helps readers to contextualize the differences in bias between news content and opinion page content.

For example, on this chart you will see The New York Times Opinion is rated as a Left media bias, while the New York Times (News Only) is rated Lean Left. Fox News Opinion content has a Right media bias, while Fox News (News Only) is Lean Right. And so on.

When rating an Opinion page, AllSides takes into account the outlet's editorial board and its individual opinion page writers. The editorial board’s bias is weighted, and affects the final bias rating by about 60%.

For example, the New York Times has a range of individual Opinion page writers, who have a range of biases. Yet The New York Times Editorial Board has a clear Left media bias. We take into account both the overall biases of the individual writers and the Editorial Board, and give the New York Times Opinion Page a final media bias rating of Left.

We also provide individual media bias ratings for each Opinion page writer. See how we did it for the New York Times Opinion page writers

Does AllSides Rate Which Outlets Are Most Factual or Accurate?

AllSides does not rate outlets based on accuracy or factual claims — this is a bias chart, not a credibility chart. We disagree with the idea that the more extreme an outlet is, the less credible it necessarily is. There’s nothing wrong with having bias or an opinion — there is something wrong with ignoring the other side.

How Does Version 1.1 of the chart differ from Version 1.0?


Where Can I Learn More?

Visit the AllSides Media Bias Ratings page and search for any outlet for a full summation of our research and how we arrived at the rating. 
Visit our company FAQ for more information about AllSides.

I Disagree With Your Media Bias Ratings. Where Can I Give You Feedback?

You can vote on whether or not you agree with our media bias ratings directly on our Media Bias Ratings page, or contact us.

Charlotte NC a new Liberal Frontier

Prosecutors drop gun charges over and over. Some suspects go on to kill.

 
In 2012, Mario McGill and several other armed men broke into a Charlotte home and shot a man in the leg, police said.
The next year, McGill was accused of firing a gun near a woman’s feet.
And the year after that, police said, he slammed the same woman to the ground and pointed a handgun at her.
Prosecutors dismissed all three cases, saying the evidence was weak.
McGill was used to that.
From late 2007 to 2014, Mecklenburg prosecutors dismissed nine consecutive weapons charges against him, records show.
He was free on Jan. 5, 2015. That was the day McGill shot and killed Robert Miller, a childhood friend.
Lisa Miller says she’s unsure why McGill killed her 26-year-old son at a west Charlotte apartment complex. But she believes Mecklenburg County’s justice system is sending a dangerous message to those who commit crimes with guns.
“It says if they get off one time, they can continue to get off,” Miller said. “They’re taking people from their families. And it doesn’t have to be that way.”
Robert Miller.jpg
Murder victim Robert Miller
Cases like McGill’s have contributed to an alarming statistic: From 2014 through 2018, Mecklenburg prosecutors dismissed 68 percent of weapons charges, a higher rate than any other urban county in North Carolina, a Charlotte Observer investigation found.
Statewide, prosecutors dismissed about half of all weapons charges during the five-year period.




Thank goodness Charlotte is too far to visit, I could never tolerate the insane Liberals there.

The investigation found:
▪ More than half of the roughly 300 people charged with murder in Mecklenburg County since 2015 had prior weapons charges.
For 28 murder suspects, a conviction on an earlier weapons charge — rather than a dismissal — would have put them behind bars at the time of the killing.
▪ Prosecutors regularly dismiss serious charges — including armed robbery. From 2014 through 2018, Mecklenburg prosecutors dropped 57 percent of all robbery charges — a rate higher than any other urban county in North Carolina and almost twice as high as Wake County.
▪ Former prosecutors said they had little choice but to plea bargain or dismiss most charges. That’s because prosecutors shoulder heavy caseloads and operate in a state-funded court system that is so overburdened that less than 1 percent of felony cases go to trial.

The idiot Sheriff in Charlotte is a Black Bo Jangles dancing for the Rich White Liberals who love the Diversity of watching young Black man kill each other!

Did Virginia Democrats Waken

Did Virginia Democrats Awaken a ‘Sleeping Giant’ 

With Their Anti-Gun Agenda?

Did Virginia Democrats Awaken a ‘Sleeping Giant’ With Their Anti-Gun Agenda?

There’s that famous quote by the late Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto. 

“I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve,” who reportedly wrote this in his diary following the attacks on Pearl Harbor. For decades, the United States tried to maintain a policy of neutrality concerning foreign wars and twice that disposition yanked us into two global conflicts. America’s industrial might was unleashed and millions of men were mobilized to fight a two-front war in what became mankind’s most destructive conflict. Now, there was no sneak attack in the Old Dominion the elicited this response, but the security blanket and quasi-apathy pro-Second Amendment voters felt was torched after the 2019 elections. The results have appeared to have awakened an electoral sleeping giant: pro-gun rights voters. 

The Trump presidency has led to many squishy GOP voters in the suburbs voting for Democrats. This development, coupled with the Virginia GOP being unable to find candidates who could win statewide and leaving nearly 25 percent of state senate races without a Republican opponent, led to disaster on election night. Virginia Republicans only had a two-seat majority in the House of Delegates and a one-seat majority in the state senate. For the first time in two decades, the Democrats control all in Richmond.

Over the summer, they gave away their playbook with that special session pitch that was torpedoed by Republicans. Yet, their agenda includes magazine limits, universal background checks, a ban on so-called assault weapons, and a mandatory date to turn such firearms over to authorities. Gun confiscation is on the docket. With that in mind, scores of Virginia counties are now declaring themselves Second Amendment sanctuaries at an unprecedented rate. Stephen Gutowski of the Washington Free Beacon interview Philip Van Cleave of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, a state-based pro-gun rights advocacy organization, who said a “sleeping giant” has been awakened with the latest election results:

"I've never seen anything like this, and I've been doing this for over 20 years," he told the Free Beacon. "It's a sleeping giant that had been pretty much not paying attention to politics, and now they're awake, and now they're flooding these sanctuary county hearings. Flooding them."
Sparked by Democrats' capture of the Virginia legislature three weeks ago, the sanctuary movement has already passed resolutions similar to VCDL's model in nearly a quarter of the state's counties. The movement could give newly elected Democrats from more moderate jurisdictions pause when considering new gun control bills—especially the confiscation plan supported by Governor Ralph Northam (D.). The sanctuary proposals could also set up a showdown between state and local officials if the former adopt new gun bans or a confiscation scheme.
[…]
"It's sending a huge message to the General Assembly that a lot of the state does not want more gun control, certainly none of the crap that they're pushing that does nothing but affect law abiding citizens," he said. "It doesn't do anything for criminals."
[…]
"They're gonna go ‘whoa, hey, if I vote for that bill you won't have a Democrat delegate in this county for the next decade,'" Van Cleave said. "All we have to do is turn a few Democrats and these bills aren't going to go anywhere."
[…]
Van Cleave said he expects a majority of the state's counties to adopt a sanctuary policy in the coming months, and his group plans to target Virginia's sheriffs and commonwealth attorneys as well.
"It's part of a multiple prong approach," he said. "A lot of sheriffs, and even chiefs of police, are going to be watching what localities do. Some of the sheriffs have said, ‘if my locality does this then I'm going to go along with it.' Then, if we get commonwealth attorneys to say ‘I'm not prosecuting this stuff,' well, that closes the loop at least in the county."

Van Cleave and the VCDL are effective. They are aggressive. And there’s no doubt he will keep fighting in the trenches until a more gun-friendly legislature is sworn in during the next election cycle. Even then, the work isn’t done. The GOP used to have a supermajority in the House of Delegates. That flipped in less than a decade. 

So far, 15 of the states 95 counties have become Second Amendment sanctuary counties. This is going to be a long slog, and it serves as a reminder that threats to the Second Amendment came from anywhere, even in states that were once thought to be reliably Republican. You can never let your guard down against the anti-gun Left. They have scored some state-based wins. They will continue on that path. Fix bayonets, load those magazines, and dig in because this fight has only just begun in Virginia. 

Thankful for...


I Am Thankful For Many Things, 

Especially The Things That Make Stupid People Sad

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
I Am Thankful For Many Things, Especially The Things That Make Stupid People Sad
Source: AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

On this special day, we should reflect upon the blessings we enjoy, and I enjoy nothing quite as much as stupid people who are miserable. There are a lot of stupid people who are miserable right now, and this is good. The misery stupid people cause themselves should disincentivize future stupidity – with luck, America will be burdened with less stupidity because of it. Think of it as natural selection of people who aren’t stupid.

But there are other things to be thankful for besides the pain dummies cause themselves as a result of their own dumbness. There are good things happening out there, though the media and the elite want to conceal them. You see them if you look – in the world, in our country, in your personal life.

There’s a lot to be thankful for, and it is right and proper that we be thankful. So, without further ado, here is what we should be especially thankful for at Thanksgiving 2019:

The Continuing Humiliation of the Fredocons: You know, it becomes clearer with every “Oh well, I never!” and every lame recitation of their liberal elite masters’ talking points about how the latest Deep State weasel’s testimony is a “bombshell” that these losers are never getting back the petty power and prestige they once possessed. The way to understand Never Trump is to see that it is solely and entirely the pathetic attempt of a bunch of has-beens and never-wases to reverse their firing as the leaders of the conservative movement by actual conservatives. Every day, these Vichy righties become less relevant and more pathetic, and thereby less likely to ever be in a position where they can lead us to failure and defeat as they did for the two decades before we fired them in favor of Donald Trump. Thanks!

Donald Trump: Imagine, if you will, living under the cold, smarmy dictatorship of Stumbles McMyturn. We knew about the staggering incompetence of our garbage elite – Iraq, Wall Street, girl Ghostbusters – but we never really understood the full extent of the corruption and rot until after the inauguration. We’ve seen a Deep State determined to undermine the will of the voters because the faculty lounge consensus at Harvard feels that promoting American interests is gauche. We’ve seen our intelligence agencies, which can’t do their actual job, meddling in domestic politics. We’ve seen formerly respected law enforcement agencies and the DoJ shamelessly push a dual-track justice system that protects the connected and persecutes the elite’s political enemies. Under Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit, this would have escalated; under Trump, the festering abscess that is our ruling caste has been exposed to the sunlight. She would have continued to marginalize and oppress us. Donald Trump stopped her, and probably saved this country from the violent conflict her tyranny would have provoked. Thanks!

Dogs: Be thankful for dogs, especially ones that try to rip the gonads off cowardly jihadi terrorists. Thanks!

Twitter: Imagine a marketplace of ideas where you can talk to thousands of other people just by typing in a few characters on your computer or phone. We all have beefs with Twitter, and too often its lefty functionaries put their soft, spindly fingers on the scales for their leftist pals, but the fact is that Twitter has created a forum for exposing liberal foolishness as well as communicating with, and organizing, fellow conservatives that has made our conservative populist rebellion possible. We isolated the gatekeepers by breaking down their walls. And it infuriates them. Thanks!

The Impeachment Schiffshow: Trump was always getting impeached. The thing is, the Democrats could have done it in a manner that appeared at least superficially fair. But instead they gave it to that weirdo Adam Schiff, whose googly eyes make him look like some sort of second-tier anime sidekick, and he has predictably turned it into a disaster. When after two weeks of testimony by bow-tied dorks, foreign-born schoolmarms who were totally “I’m with Her,” and the sausage soldier, the American people have chosen to respond with a significant increase in support for the president. Way to go, dummies. Thanks!

Economic Prosperity: You might not have heard about it, but we’re in a boom – though it is not the kind of boom the elite prefers because normal people are sharing in the benefits. The people hurt most by the greed and self-service of our globalist elite are finally getting their cut of the good times, and it’s magnificent. Unemployment for blue collar workers and minorities is the lowest in the history of ever, but hey – Trump tweeted something mean so we need to go back to malaise because of principles or something. Thanks!

The Senate and Cocaine Mitch: It’s weird to think anything positive about the Senate, but damned if it has not been a bulwark of freedom, as opposed to a Bulwark of otherwise unemployable cruise-shillin’ losers, by punching out judge after Constitution-reading judge under the stern guidance of the Murder Turtle. And if rumors about the condition of RBG, one of the few liberals I respect (for her toughness), are true, the Senate will soon provide the means to enshrine a pro-freedom majority on the SCOTUS for the first time in living memory. Just brace yourself for the chaos that will ensue. Thanks!

Chick Fil-A’s Cowardice: It pained me to see what had been a stalwart and independent voice of conscience cravenly submit to the left. Their spines turned out to be as boneless as their chicken patties. Of course, anyone with even the tiniest bit of wokeness could have seen what would (and instantly did) happen. As soon as the poultry purveyors groveled, the professional LGBTQ+X&#z8 malcontents started with more demands. This is why the only proper response to leftist agitators is to tell them to go Weekly Standard themselves. And while I despise Chick Fil-A for betraying the Salvation Army to curry favor with people who will always hate it, I am glad that I no longer have to eat there. I understand the sour grapes thing, but this is absolutely true – I had a chicken biscuit, which I used to love, the prior Saturday morning, and I thought, “You know, this really isn’t very good anymore.” I would have kept showing solidarity, but now I don’t have to. Chick Fil-A, take your mediocre grub and shove it up your Bulwark. Thanks, jerks!

The Salvation Army: I’m not a member of this church, but I am a supporter, and the fact that Chick Fil-A thought that by abandoning the charity organization that helps more  Please help the SA help others through my friend Hugh Hewitt’s Red Kettle drive. Conservatives properly want to get government out of the “helping” people business, so we need to be sure we’re doing our part to help those truly in need. The best way to say “Thanks” is by giving someone else something to be thankful for.
Thanks!

Thanksgiving Proclamation/ A Day Late

George Washington’s Thanksgiving Proclamation: 

What a Different Era

His words and humility stand in stark contrast to the politicians of our time.

George Washington’s Thanksgiving Proclamation: What a Different Era
(This story was originally published by Intellectual Takeout on November 22, 2017.)
Thanksgiving is a quintessential American holiday. It is a holiday that in many ways requires some sense of the supernatural – whether we care to acknowledge it or not. Below you will find our first President’s proclamation of Thanksgiving in which his sense of the hand of Providence upon the American Republic is quite clear. Indeed, his mixing of church and state, of belief and practice is undeniable.

When you read it, consider the tone, humility, and outlook of President George Washington and ask yourself if any of our current leaders match him. It is, for me, a breath of fresh air, a reminder that while our Founders had many sins, they were at the same time driven to seek the good, the true, and the beautiful. They were deeply rooted in Western Civilization and understood the symbiosis between belief and practice.

For those who would argue that the Founders believed in a firm separation between church and state, a division of belief and practice, this document is a challenge. Here we have the first president, a man who served his country in humility, helped steer her course, and intimately understood the type of government they were creating, assigning a day through government proclamation to be one “devoted by the People of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being, who is the beneficient Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be…” President Washington even gives thanks to the Almighty for the Constitution!

Taking our cue from our first President, on this Thanksgiving we shouldgive thanks and, furthermore, take the time to refresh both our spirits and minds. Godspeed!

Thanksgiving Proclamation
New York, 3 October 1789
(Bold is added by the author.)
By the President of the United States of America. a Proclamation.

Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor—and whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint Committee requested me “to recommend to the People of the United States a day of George Washington Praying Thanksgivingpublic thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.”

Now therefore I do recommend and assign Thursday the 26th day of November next to be devoted by the People of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being, who is the beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be—That we may then all unite in rendering unto him our sincere and humble thanks—for his kind care and protection of the People of this Country previous to their becoming a Nation—for the signal and manifold mercies, and the favorable interpositions of his Providence which we experienced in the course and conclusion of the late war—for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty, which we have since enjoyed—for the peaceable and rational manner, in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national One now lately instituted—for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed; and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and in general for all the great and various favors which he hath been pleased to confer upon us.

and also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations and beseech him to pardon our national and other transgressions—to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually—to render our national government a blessing to all the people, by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed—to protect and guide all Sovereigns and Nations (especially such as have shewn kindness unto us) and to bless them with good government, peace, and concord—To promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the encrease of science among them and us—and generally to grant unto all Mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as he alone knows to be best.

Given under my hand at the City of New-York the third day of October in the year of our Lord 1789.
Go: Washington
Source: “Thanksgiving Proclamation, 3 October 1789,” Founders Online, National Archives, last modified June 29, 2017,

London Bridge: At least one killed in stabbing attack

A number of people are believed to have been injured after a stabbing at London Bridge, police have said.
The Met Police said they were called to a stabbing at a premises near the bridge just before 14:00.
The force said it had detained a man. London Ambulance Service has declared a "major incident".
The BBC's John McManus, at the scene, said he had seen a group of men in a fight on the bridge. Police then arrived and shots were fired, he said.
British Transport Police said London Bridge station was currently closed and no trains would be stopping there.
Police have advised people near the scene to follow directions from officers on the ground.

McManus told the BBC News channel: "Just a few minutes ago I was walking across London Bridge on the south bank to the north bank of the bridge.
"There appeared to be a fight going on on the other side of the bridge, with several men attacking one man.
"Police then quickly arrived, including armed police, and then a number of shots were fired at this man."

A video has emerged showing police officers aiming guns at a white lorry that jack-knifed across London Bridge.
The footage shows several officers surrounding the vehicle before moving to the rear to check its container.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50604781

Why Is Black Friday...


Why Is Black Friday Called Black Friday?

Despite the holiday’s popularity, most people have no idea why Black Friday is called Black Friday.

I’ve never understood Black Friday. Hoards of people scrambling to buy stuff on the busiest shopping day of the year? It sounds dreadful. Instead of lazing in gratitude with a belly full of turkey and pie, people descend on stores in the wee hours to consume more.

No thanks.

Still, there’s no denying Black Friday is a big deal. Last year 165 millionAmericans—half the population—shopped on the weekend of Black Friday, according to the National Retail Federation. Shoppers spent a record $6.22 billion in online sales alone. Total sales usually range from $50 to $60 billion.

Despite the holiday’s popularity, most people have no idea why Black Friday is called Black Friday.

When I started researching for this article, I was a bit fuzzy on Black Friday’s origins myself. Turns out I wasn’t the only one. My wife had no idea. I asked one wicked smaht friend. He was clueless. One young person I asked said he’d heard Black Friday stemmed from the slave trade. (For the record, that’s a myth.)

So what’s the truth? And why do so few people know the origins of a popular holiday?

First, this isn’t the only Black Friday. Several historical events were dubbed Black Friday, including the Panic of 1869, which involved the Grant Administration releasing a large supply of gold to spite speculators trying to corner the market. That’s the official version, anyway. All you really need to know is that gold prices tanked, fortunes were lost.

That has nothing to do with Thanksgiving or shopping, but it’s one reason people are confused about Black Friday. The bigger reason though is the origins of this Black Friday are organic and hazy. In fact, there are at least three competing explanations for why we call Black Friday “Black Friday.”

Black Friday as National Hooky Day

The first record we have of anyone referring to the day after Thanksgiving as “Black Friday” is found in an obscure magazine from the 1950s. It was a reference to Americans playing hooky—skipping work—on Friday so they’d have a four-day weekend.

The article, titled "What to Do about Friday After Thanksgiving," appeared in Factory Management and Maintenance, a periodical for engineers and factory managers. It talked about the problem of people not showing up for work after Turkey Day.
"Friday-after-Thanksgiving-itis" is a disease second only to the bubonic plague in its effects. At least that's the feeling of those who have to get production out, when the "Black Friday" comes along. The shop may be half empty, but every absentee was sick—and can prove it. What to do? Many companies have tried the standard device of denying Thanksgiving Day pay to employees absent the day before and after the holiday. Trouble is, you can't deny pay to those legitimately ill. But what's legitimate? Tough to decide these days of often miraculously easy doctors' certificates.

Basically, Black Friday was the 1950s equivalent of Monday after the Super Bowl. Everyone just called in sick. As a result, productivity tanked. Nobody really knew what to do about it, which is probably why many companies just started giving workers the day off.

Black Friday as Chaos and Exploitation


I’d never heard the hooky version of Black Friday. I’d always assumed that the name had something to do with the holiday’s craziness. Something like this…

If you think I’m joking, consider that since 2006, a dozen people have diedduring the shopping craze and more than a hundred have been injured. When people assume this is why we call the holiday Black Friday, they’re not exactly wrong.

Since everyone was playing hooky in the 1950s (see item #1), I guess they had to do something. For many Americans, this meant buying stuff. This turned Black Friday into one of the busiest shopping days of the year—the busiest in some cities, including Philadelphia.

Not long after the phrase “Black Friday” appeared in Factory Management and Maintenance, Philadelphia law enforcement started to use the term Black Friday to refer to the floods of shoppers who descended on the city between Thanksgiving and the Army-Navy football game on Saturday.

In this narrative, Black Friday is chaos, consumerism, traffic congestion, and worker exploitation.
This was creating all kinds of headaches for cops, and we see in this origin story the first seeds of labor discontent associated with the holiday. The long hours and high stress strained public resources. Cops were forbidden from taking off.

"It was a double whammy," Bonnie Taylor-Blake, a neuroscience researcher at the University of North Carolina, told CNN in 2014. "Traffic cops were required to work 12-hour shifts, no one could take off and people would flood the sidewalks, parking lots and streets. The cops had to deal with it all and coined the term."

Though the term was mostly used in Philly, some New Yorkers were also complaining about “Black Friday.” A report from 1961 mentions New Yorkers waiting in traffic “through 13 changes of a single traffic light” and bus drivers on strike.

In this narrative, Black Friday is chaos, consumerism, traffic congestion, and worker exploitation.

Black Friday as Merchants Getting into the Black


It’s no surprise retailers hated this big shopping day associated with such dark imagery. Let’s face it, the term Black Friday sounds rather ominous.

To solve this problem, some stores out east got together in the early 1960s to rebrand Black Friday “Big Friday.” Great idea, right? Well, it didn’t take.

In fact, nearly a quarter century later, Philadelphia department stores were still resisting the term, which media had attached to.

"Black Friday is a phrase that's sinful and it's disgusting,” one local department store chairman told the Inquirer in 1985. "Why would anyone call a day, when everyone is happy and has smiles on their faces, Black Friday?”

Though the term was not yet popularized nationally, the phrase had taken on a life of its own. Perhaps realizing they were stuck with the Black Friday label, stores began to talk about Black Friday putting them “in the black.” (Historically, stores recorded losses in red ink and profits in black ink.)

This explanation suited retailers and matched their reality.

“It’s a misnomer, but 20, 30 years ago, people did view Black Friday as the day that retailers started to be ‘in the black’ after a year of not being in the black,” Ray Hartjen, a retail analytics expert at RetailNext, told Vox. “All the volume through the holiday season made them profitable retailers.”

The earliest known reference to Black Friday as a day when stores are finally making profits comes from a 1981 Philadelphia Inquirer article.
How the day got its name is a matter of debate. Shoppers contend that it is derived from the enormous crowds that make shopping somewhat unpleasant. But merchants say it has to do with the fact that the level of sales before Christmas can mean the difference between losses for the year—or red ink on a retailer's ledger—and profits—or black ink.

In the late 1980s and 1990s, as more and more retailers began to see Black Friday as the season when they finally covered their expenses—rent, payroll, benefits, legal fees, taxes, etc.—they began to embrace the name, giving rise to its popularity.

The Black Friday Debate


The historical narratives of Black Friday compete with one another today in large part because they are part of a larger political narrative.

Some see Black Friday as a day when greedy corporations exploit workers for long hours to profit from the consumer hoards. Others see Black Friday as a day when businesses make a killing by offering blowout deals, and consumers get to buy the next greatest thing.

In recent years, retailers raised the stakes by opening stores earlier and earlier.

In 2003, stores like Walmart, Kmart, and (the recently bankrupt) Sears offered pre-dawn sales for the first time. That same year Black Friday became the most profitable shopping day of the year in the US for the first time ever, according to the International Council of Shopping Centers.

Encouraged, retailers began opening earlier and earlier. What started as 5 a.m. openings became 2 a.m., and then midnight. In 2011 many stores opened on Thanksgiving for the first time.

Barbara Kahn, a marketing professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and author of The Shopping Revolution, told Vox that Black Friday “creep” is the natural outcome of free-market competition.

Consumerism may be vulgar, but it beats hunger and poverty seven days a week.
“When someone is offering 50 percent discounts from 10 to 11 on Friday, you can offer 51 percent from 9 to 10 on Friday,” said Kahn. “That competitive response will cause the creeping behavior—it getting earlier and earlier—because you want [customers] to buy from you instead of the competition.”

Basically, retailers are competing with one another to offer the best deals before their competition. Many see low prices and high profits as a win-win, but others see workers pressured into working the holiday season.

Whether one sees Black Friday as good or bad will depend on the person. People who view the world through the lens of exploitation and see consumerism as decadent or crass probably won’t like it. People who love good deals or appreciate the benefits of free-market capitalism likely will view Black Friday differently.

I may never step into a department store on Black Friday, but I know enough history to be grateful to live in a country so rich and free that literally half the population rushes out to buy stuff—after eating a massive feast.

Consumerism may be vulgar, but it beats hunger and poverty seven days a week.