Saturday, November 16, 2019
Better Served if...
More No Firsthand Knowledge
Marie Yovanovitch Testifies
She Has No Firsthand Knowledge of Trump's Ukraine Phone Call or Delay in Aid
Adam Schiff Does Not Like It When A Republican Woman Speaks Without His Permission
How many times can Adam Schiff say “the Gentlewoman is NOT recognized”? He clearly has NO interest in letting Republicans have any say in the impeachment hearings. Watch him interrupt us multiple times and refuse to yield for our parliamentary questions👇👇 pic.twitter.com/DnudgOe5Ed— Elise Stefanik (@EliseStefanik) November 15, 2019
“The gentlewoman is not recognized,” Schiff asserted again and again.
The House Intelligence Committee chairman’s conduct exposes a flagrant double-standard. If Stefanik were a Democrat, the liberals and media would be screaming with allegations of sexism.
He told an elected female member of Congress to be quiet and then allowed a male staffer to speak instead of her. https://t.co/sMrzweKOVe— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) November 15, 2019
On the Republican's time, Adam Schiff silences a female member of Congress who tries to question a female witness. So, when you hear the narrative that Republican men bullied a female witness, don't buy it.— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) November 15, 2019
Clearly @RepAdamSchiff is threatened by @EliseStefanik speaking at all.— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) November 15, 2019
Nunes just yielded time to @RepStefanik, and Schiff just told her she's not allowed to speak. He's done that repeatedly today to her. Stefanik noted this was the 5th or 6th time today Schiff told Republicans they weren't allowed to ask questions.— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) November 15, 2019
The Albany Times Union’s managing editor touted that moment, provoking a response from Stefanik.
“Sad when the editor of the @timesunion spouts off about what everyone who was in the room knows was a sexist remark just because I was the only young woman at the table and it was wrongly assumed I was staff,” Stefanik wrote on Twitter, adding that multiple members of both parties approached her about how it was “disgusting to witness.”
Sad when the editor of the @timesunion spouts off about what everyone who was in the room knows was a sexist remark just because I was the only young woman at the table and it was wrongly assumed I was staff 👇 Multiple R and D Members told me how this was disgusting to witness. https://t.co/2LaH0W3lQn— Elise Stefanik (@EliseStefanik) November 8, 2019
Elise Stefanik: “The One Woman Impeachment Wrecking Crew”
Thanks to Stefanik, we learned that Comey deliberately bypassed standard operating procedure and kept Congress in the dark on the so-called “investigation” of Donald Trump.
Elise Stefanik has an uncanny ability to strip away the BS and get to the nub of the matter.
Not that it did any good.
When Elise Stefanik finally had some time to ask questions, she once again stripped away the BS and exposed the non-witness as a liar.
In her opening statement, Yovanovitch made this claim:
”I have never met Hunter Biden, nor have I had any direct or indirect conversations with him. And although I have met former Vice President Biden several times over the course of our many years in government, neither he nor the previous Administration ever raised the issue of either Burisma or Hunter Biden with me.”
Then when Stefanik finally had a chance to question the disgruntled former ambassador, she got Yovanovitch to admit the opposite.
Without even realizing it, Stefanik got Yovanovitch to acknowledge that her opening statement was a lie.
The “previous Administration” absolutely “raised the issue” of Burisma and Hunter Biden with her.
Ironic, isn’t it? Elise Stefanik got Yovanovitch to contradict her own sworn testimony on the very same day Roger Stone was found guilty of lying to Congress.
Stefanik also hammered Adam Schiff as if she was the one wielding the gavel. And it was absolutely Schadenfreuderrific.
I know you are rightly not bothering to watch this but you should definitely listen @EliseStefanik when Schifff finally allowed her to speak. Listen and learn what a sham this is. Retweet please. #EliseStefanik#ImpeachmentSham #AmbassadorYovanovich #Schiff pic.twitter.com/i333o1d5te
— Heather Champion (@winningatmylife) November 15, 2019
Just look at his face. Deep in that lizard brain of his, Adam is already trying to figure out how to spin this during his next appearance on CNN and MSNBC.
It’s a wonder his eyes weren’t bugging out of his head.
In fact, the very same media outlets that couldn’t get enough of Elizabeth Warren being “silenced” by Mitch McConnell are cheering over Schiff repeatedly shutting down Stefanik’s attempts to question the non-witness. Because, of course they are.
Contrast CNN mocking a rotating story on Fox homepage today vs CNN homepage during 2017 confirmation battles. pic.twitter.com/dOXmPW74Vo
— Watchdog (@LibWatchdog) November 15, 2019
No group of people is more sexist than women of the Left: pic.twitter.com/N1Ol061BFE
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) November 15, 2019
Elise Stefanik is tearing the impeachment narrative to shreds. That’s bad for Adam Schiff. But it is doubly bad for the corporate news media that is fully invested in taking out Donald Trump by banging the impeachment drums.
That’s why, despite Republicans like Stefanik exposing the sheer stupidity of having a disgruntled former ambassador who witnessed absolutely nothing being cast in the role of “star witness,” the media is acting as if Yovanovitch’s testimony was a game-changer.
And while the media blusters and cheers pretending that “this time we got him!” most people outside of the media bubble who aren’t dyed-in-the-wool ResistanceLOL know this sham impeachment isn’t going well for Adam Schiff and the Democrats.
Trump’s approval numbers continue to climb; and his campaign continues to haul in contributions from small-money donors.
Meanwhile, every day Republicans are given an opportunity to tell a national audience about the actual corruption vis-à-vis Ukraine: Joe Robinette Biden – something Julie Kelly pointed out in her column yesterday: Impeachment Inquiry is bad for Biden.
Every witness thus far has acknowledged the concerns the Obama State Department had over Hunter Biden’s dealings with Burisma. And who was one of the Republicans getting that information from the witnesses?
Elise Stefanik.
As Sean Davis of the Federalist said yesterday on Twitter, Stefanik is “a one-woman impeachment wrecking crew.”
Is it any wonder Adam Schiff and his media handmaids want to shut her up?
Ruling Class, Here’s Your Warning
“Sundance” at the popular website “Conservative Treehouse” has posited that the ruling class plan that Americans are about to watch unfold inside the Beltway basically involves a three-step process: (1) the House votes for impeachment, (2) the Senate holds a six toeight-week trial and votes to convict and remove the President, and (3) Vice President Pence becomes President, and Nikki Haley, fresh off a scripted book tour plan to increase her visibility and acceptability, gets the appointment to serve as vice president.
The troublesome Trump will be done away with, order will be restored, and the Vindmans of D.C. can resume their rightful place as the determiners of American government policy, foreign and domestic. Enough ‘Republicans’ will be bought off by Pence’s seeming conservatism and Haley’s professed loyalty to Trump (at least as compared to John Kelly and Rex Tillerson) to quell any resistance from the knuckle-dragging far right.
Sundance has a pretty good record of reading the political tea leaves in this coup era, so it’s pretty jolting to get his read in such explicit terms.
If Sundance is right as to the plan, we’d like to interject right now a blunt warning to the ruling class elite from both parties who might lend their support, or withhold their resistance, to such a plan: borrowing from the truly impactful words once uttered by Bush 41 – “this will not stand.”
The ruling class has swallowed the lies that the Beltway and its Pravda media and its Big Tech allies control the news cycle; that Lawfare sophists control the definition of fairness, due process, and justice; that a controlling majority of Americans think history began the day before yesterday, and accordingly will accept their plan with a shrug of the shoulders and go back to their meaningless, uninspired, disengaged lives. Sure, a few might feel more than a shrug of the shoulders, and some may cling to their guns and Bibles and offer those silly ‘thoughts and prayers’, but in the end, they can be counted on to move on.
Ain’t gonna happen.
We’ve previously chronicled the accumulating resentments from the Obama regime that elected Donald Trump to the Presidency. The fire stoked by those resentments has not subsided, and Coup #1, the Russia Collusion fraud, and Coup #2, the Ciaramella/Pajama Boy whistleblower fraud, have thrown the highest-octane gasoline imaginable on that fire. The ruling class has no idea how hot and nationwide that fire is.
Adam Schiff apparently has enough Pravda sycophants around him to make him think his orchestrated show trial is winning hearts and minds across the country. He is out of his mind.
Secret testimony, selective leaking, manipulatively edited transcripts, posturing about the nonexistent sacredness of whistleblower anonymity (after an Obama administration that terrorized whistleblowers), and all the while whistling past the manifest corruption of the Biden family as if Americans can’t see it -- Schiff’s fraud has exceeded the capacity of the English language to convey its depravity and moral bankruptcy. “Disgusting, disgraceful, egregious, unconscionable, abominable” -- these are level 2 or 3 words for a level 10 travesty.
So what will it mean to say “this will not stand”?
There’s a spirit and power in American ideals that cannot long be mocked by men and women, no matter how credentialed or clever they might be.
And here’s a word -- which seems to be to the ruling class like garlic to a vampire -- that explains the spirit and power of these ideals: they are divine. You may fight against them if you want, and your fight may cause catastrophe for a while, but you will not win. Slavery couldn’t possibly be reconciled with American ideals, and America’s first Civil War stands as the example of what happens when the ruling classes try to deny or sidestep or outrun or overrule these divine ideals.
We most often speak of these ideals in the vernacular of the Declaration of Independence -- all men (and women) created equal; all endowed by their Creator with unalienable rights, including the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But here’s a formulation of one of those divine ideals in different terms: it is the right of we the people to ‘self-government under God.’
The individual, as Ayn Rand put it, is the smallest minority on earth, and in America, the individual is sovereign, free. The government doesn’t exist to rule him; he governs himself, and the government’s job is to protect his right to do so. He doesn’t stand for a tyrannical mob telling him what he can do with his life, how much of what he earns he can keep, what his carbon footprint can be, what his food and drink shall be, what temperature his thermostat can be set to, what and where and from whom he shall obtain healthcare. He owes faithfulness and obedience to the God of the Bible, to live as best he can in accord with the ideal of loving his neighbor as himself, but he doesn’t need legislators to tell him how to do that.
And he sure as hell doesn’t stand still to have King George in the 1700s or the Deep State in the 2000s tell him who the President of the United States of America can or cannot be.
Most Americans know the nation as they have understood it is fundamentally at risk in 2019. They are smarter than the ruling class believes; they know no matter how loudly Pravda screams to the contrary, this war in 2019 is not about the icky personality of Donald Trump. It’s about the future of a divinely inspired idea called America. Taking down Trump is a proxy for taking down America; it’s about taking down the idea of individual freedom and self-government; ultimately, it’s about taking down the idea of God.
Ain’t gonna happen.
Ruling class, you’ve been warned.
Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/11/ruling_class_heres_your_warning.html#ixzz65SgK2YyV
William Barr: Democrats' investigations into Trump are political harassment meant to 'sabotage' his presidency
AG Bill Barr Speaks About The Damage to Our Nation From The “Resistance”
More specifically, AG Barr discusses how, in the Trump-era, the resistance movement has abdicated their legislative power and responsibility in favor of a politically motivated intent to harm the constitutional executive power.
Does being a political opponent of an administration make you immune from investigation?
One other point to get out of the way at the outset - the last 3 years establish that it is 100% ok for an administration to conduct an investigation of its political opponent. The Obama administration did exactly that in its investigation of Trump as a co-conspirator in the Russian interference with the 2016 election. So, presiding over an investigation into a political opponent is totally legit and beyond question. The only distinction that can be drawn is that it's ok to preside over it, you just cannot request it.
All of that out of the way, the only remaining issue is whether using presidential power to demand an investigation, a totally legitimate exercise of power, does not extend to ordering investigations into political opponents - immunity.
How far would this immunity extend? Is it just to people running against you? Would it extend to someone who posts everyday about how horrible of a president you are? Could a president order an investigation into that political opponent? If he did would it be impeachable?
How about Michael Avenatti? He was a personal and litigious opponent of the president and even floated the idea of running against him. He is being investigated and prosecuted. If Trump had ordered it, could he be impeached?
Is the distinction that Avenatti did it while Hunter Biden didn't?
None of this follows logically. If everything about the facts alleged was precisely the same except instead of Burisma and Hunter, it was Bill Gates and Microsoft, would impeachment be on the table?
Lots of questions and no answers. Do you have any?
1 . . . 2 . . . 3 . . . GO!
Whatever Happened to Teaching History?
The latest NAEP survey finds that proficiency levels for fourth-, eighth- and 12th-grade students are in the 20, 18 and 12th percentile, respectively.
Part of this, I suspect, is the way the subject is taught. History is boring to many students. It was boring to me in high school and college. Who wants to read about a bunch of dead white men one cannot view on video, or even in high-resolution photographs?
I asked David M. Rubenstein about this. Rubenstein has so many titles and accomplishments, including co-founder and co-executive chairman of the private equity firm, the Carlyle Group, and chairman of the Board of Trustees for the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.
His new book, The American Story: Conversations with Master Historians, is a series of interviews with contemporary writers, including Jon Meacham, Doris Kearns Goodwin, David McCullough, Robert Caro and Jay Winik. All have written highly readable biographies that metaphorically raise America's Founders and other important historical figures from the dead, making readers feel they are in the same room where they speak to us today.
Why does Rubenstein think U.S. history has taken a back seat to every other subject? He replied: “To some extent it started after Sputnik in 1957 when people were concerned that our science and technology were not as good as the Soviets ... then when China came along as an economic and technological threat ... the emphasis on STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) became a bigger deal. Also, I think parents said to their children ‘make sure you study something that will get you a job when you graduate.’ All of this made history go down and therefore we don't teach it very much.”
Rubenstein tells me this is not in his book, but something he finds shocking: “Today you can graduate from any college in the United States without having to take an American history course and you can graduate as a history major in 80 percent of the colleges and not have to take an American history course.”
As if this were not stunning enough, he adds: “A recent survey revealed that if one is foreign born and wishes to become a citizen, you have to be a resident for five years. It used to be 14. After five years you take a test. Ninety-one percent of the people pass. The same test was given to native-born citizens in all 50 states by the Woodrow Wilson Foundation. A majority failed in every state, except Vermont. This shows you how bad the situation has gotten.”
Rubenstein says when history is taught it is more about world civilizations than American history. While he says he doesn't think learning about other countries is a bad idea, “it's good to know your own history. I do find as I travel around the world that people know more about American history than people in the United States do.”
While he won't comment on the role political correctness has played in the spinning of American history, the stories one hears coming from public schools and universities seems to confirm that the facts of America's past are being revised to reflect a liberal and contemporary view. That is because some of the Founders owned slaves and explorers like Christopher Columbus are said to have wrecked a society of indigenous people and these “stains” can never be washed away, or at least seen in the context of their major achievements.
David Rubenstein's interviews are a thrilling trip to the past and ought to be required reading for anyone who cares about America's future because, as Shakespeare wrote, “What's past is prologue.”
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/cal-thomas/2019/11/14/whatever-happened-teaching-history
The Origins of the Thought Police
The Origins of the Thought Police—
and Why They Scare Us
In a sense, "1984" is largely a book about the human capacity to maintain a grip on the truth in the face of propaganda and power.
We do not destroy the heretic because he resists us: so long as he resists us we never destroy him. We convert him, we capture his inner mind, we reshape him.
Who Are These Thought Police?
The Origins of the Thought Police
The anarchists were still in virtual control of Catalonia and the revolution was still in full swing ... It was the first time that I had ever been in a town where the working class was in the saddle,
[E]very wall was scrawled with the hammer and sickle ... every shop and café had an inscription saying that it had been collectivized.
...I saw newspaper reports which did not bear any relation to the facts, not even the relationship which is implied in an ordinary lie. I saw great battles reported where there had been no fighting, and complete silence where hundreds of men had been killed. I saw troops who had fought bravely denounced as cowards and traitors, and others who had never seen a shot fired hailed as the heroes of imaginary victories; and I saw newspapers in London retailing these lies and eager intellectuals building emotional superstructures over events that had never happened.
More Prophetic Than He Knew?
The New Thought Police?
Lying to Congress – Marie Yovanovitch Was Prepped by Obama Administration About Issues With Hunter Biden and Burisma
Contrary to her opening statement, former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch later admitted under questioning that Obama-Biden officials prepared her to answer questions about Hunter Biden's role on the board of Ukrainian gas company Burisma during her 2016 confirmation hearing. pic.twitter.com/GrGOxThFyC
— Trump War Room (Text TRUMP to 88022) (@TrumpWarRoom) November 15, 2019